Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment.

BACKGROUND: Endoluminal functional impedance planimetry and panometry assesses secondary peristalsis in response to volumetric distention under sedation. We hypothesize that impedance planimetry and panometry can replace high-resolution manometry in the preoperative assessment prior to anti-reflux surgery. METHODS: Single institution prospective data were collected from patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery between 2021 and 2023. A 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) assessed planimetry and panometry prior to surgery under general anesthesia at the start of each case. Panometry was recorded and esophageal contractile response was classified as normal (NCR), diminished or disordered (DDCR), or absent (ACR) in real time by a single panometry rater, blinded to preoperative HRM results. FLIP results were then compared to preoperative HRM. RESULTS: Data were collected from 120 patients, 70.8% female, with mean age of 63 ± 3 years. There were 105 patients with intraoperative panometry, and 15 with panometry collected during preoperative endoscopy. There were 60 patients (50%) who had peristaltic dysfunction on HRM, of whom 57 had FLIP dysmotility (55 DDCR, 2 ACR) resulting in 95.0% sensitivity. There were 3 patients with normal secondary peristalsis on FLIP with abnormal HRM, all ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). No major motility disorder was missed by FLIP. A negative predictive value of 91.9% was calculated from 34/37 patients with normal FLIP panometry and normal HRM. Patients with normal HRM but abnormal FLIP had larger hernias compared to patients with concordant studies (7.5 ± 2.8 cm vs. 5.4 ± 3.2 cm, p = 0.043) and higher preoperative dysphagia scores (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Impedance planimetry and panometry can assess motility under general anesthesia or sedation and is highly sensitive to peristaltic dysfunction. Panometry is a novel tool that has potential to streamline and improve patient care and therefore should be considered as an alternative to HRM, especially in patients in which HRM would be inaccessible or poorly tolerated.

EndoFLIP assessment of pyloric sphincter in children: a single-center experience.

Background: Gastrointestinal complaints are common in children with neurodisabilities, vomiting, retching and poor feed tolerance are frequently reported. Endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is used to assess compliance and distensibility of the pylorus and can predict response to Botulinum Toxin in adult with gastroparesis. We aimed to review pyloric muscle measurements using EndoFLIP in children with neuromuscular disabilities and significant foregut symptoms and to assess the clinical response to intrapyloric Botulinum Toxin. Methods: Retrospective review of clinical notes of all children who underwent pyloric EndoFLIP assessment in Evelina London Children's Hospital from March 2019 to January 2022. EndoFLIP catheter was inserted at the time of endoscopy via existing gastrostomy tract. Results: A total of 335 measurement from 12 children were obtained, mean age 10.7±4.2 years. Measurements (pre and post Botox) were obtained with 20, 30 and 40 mL balloon volume. Diameter (6.5, 6.6), (7.8, 9.4) and (10.1, 11.2), compliance (92.3, 147.9), (89.7, 142.9) and (77, 85.4) mm3/mmHg, distensibility (2.6, 3.8), (2.7, 4.4) and (2.1, 3) mm2/mmHg and balloon pressure was (13.6, 9.6), (20.9, 16.2) and (42.3, 35) mmHg. Eleven children reported clinical symptom improvement after Botulinum Toxin injection. Balloon pressure was positively correlated to diameter (r=0.63, P<0.001). Conclusions: Children with neurodisabilities who present with symptoms suggestive of poor gastric emptying do have a low pyloric distensibility and poor compliance. EndoFLIP via existing gastrostomy tract is quick and easy to perform. Intrapyloric Botulinum Toxin appears to be safe and effective in this cohort of children leading to clinical and measurements improvement.

Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. However, none of these diagnostic tools evaluate the pylorus itself. Our study demonstrates the successful measurement of pyloric distensibility in patients with DGCE after esophagectomy and in those without it. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between May 2021 and October 2021, we performed a retrospective single-centre study of all patients who had an oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and underwent our post-surgery follow-up programme with surveillance endoscopies and computed tomography scans. EndoFlip™ was used to perform measurements of the pylorus under endoscopic control, and distensibility was measured at 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml balloon filling. RESULTS: We included 70 patients, and EndoFlip™ measurement was feasible in all patients. Successful application of EndoFlip™ was achieved in all interventions (n = 70, 100%). 51 patients showed a normal postoperative course, whereas 19 patients suffered from DGCE. Distensibility proved to be smaller in patients with symptoms of DGCE compared to asymptomatic patients. For 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml, the mean distensibility was 6.4 vs 10.1, 5.7 vs 7.9 and 4.5 vs 6.3 mm2/mmHg. The differences were significant for all three balloon fillings. No severe EndoFlip™ treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Measurement with EndoFlip™ is a safe and technically feasible endoscopic option for measuring the distensibility of the pylorus. Our study shows that the distensibility in asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy is significantly higher than that in patients suffering from DGCE. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the general use of EndoFlip™ measurement of the pylorus after esophagectomy.

A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.

Swallowing impairment is a highly prevalent and clinically significant problem affecting people and dogs. There are myriad causes of swallowing impairment of which gastroesophageal reflux is the most common in both species. Similarities in anatomy and physiology between humans and canines results in analogous swallowing disorders including cricopharyngeus muscle achalasia, esophageal achalasia, hiatal herniation, and gastroesophageal reflux with secondary esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility. Accordingly, the diagnostic approach to human and canine patients with swallowing impairment is similar. Diagnostic procedures such as swallowing fluoroscopy, high-resolution manometry, pH/impedance monitoring, and endolumenal functional luminal imaging probe can be performed in both species; however, nasofacial conformation, increased esophageal length, and the difficulty of completing several of these procedures in awake dogs are inherent challenges that need to be considered. Human patients can convey their symptoms and respond to verbal cues, whereas veterinarians must rely on clinical histories narrated by pet owners followed by comprehensive physical examination and observation of the animal eating different food consistencies and drinking water. Dogs may also be unwilling to drink or eat in the hospital setting and may be resistant to physical restraint during diagnostic procedures. Despite the species differences and diagnostic challenges, dogs are a natural animal model for many oropharyngeal and esophageal disorders affecting people, which presents a tremendous opportunity for shared learnings. This manuscript reviews the comparative aspects of esophageal anatomy and physiology between humans and canines, summarizes the diagnostic assessment of swallowing impairment in both species, and discusses future considerations for collaborative medicine and translational research.

Assessment of pyloric sphincter distensibility and pressure in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that pyloric distensibility is altered in 30-50% of gastroparetic patients but the number of diabetic patients included in prior reports has been small. The aim of the present study was to assess pyloric sphincter measurements in diabetic patients with gastroparesis and to determine whether diabetes characteristics were correlated to pyloric disfunction. METHODS: Pyloric distensibility and pressure were measured using EndoFLIP® system in 46 patients with diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) and compared with 21 healthy volunteers (HV), and 33 patients with idiopathic gastroparesis (IGP). Altered pyloric distensibility was defined as the measurement below 10 mm2 /mmHg at 40 ml of inflation. In diabetic patients, blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, duration, complications, and treatments were collected. KEY RESULTS: Mean pyloric distensibility at 40 ml of inflation was lower in DGP and IGP groups with, respectively, 10.8 ± 0.9 mm2 /mmHg and 14.8 ± 2.2 mm2 /mmHg in comparison with the HV group (25.2 ± 2.3 mm2 /mmHg; p < 0.005). 56.5% of patients had a decreased pyloric distensibility in the DGP group, 51.5% of patients in the IGP group, and 10% of patients in the HV group. No correlation was found between pyloric sphincter measurements and diabetes characteristics, including blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, diabetes mellitus type, neuropathy, or GLP1 agonists intake. CONCLUSION AND INTERFERENCES: Pyloric sphincter distensibility and pressure were altered both in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Pyloric sphincter distensibility was not correlated to diabetes parameters.

Assessment of anal sphincter distensibility following the STARR procedure: a pilot study.

Aim: The STARR (Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection) procedure consists of a surgical correction of symptomatic rectocele refractory to medical treatment, involving anal dilatation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the STARR procedure on anal distensibility using EndoFLIP® device.Methods: All female patients with a minimal rectocele of 3 cm and with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) refractory to medical treatment were included prospectively. Patients with previous anal incontinence were not included. Wexner, ODS and Kess scores were recorded. Endoanal ultrasounds and EndoFLIP® measurements were performed pre-surgery and 3 months following the STARR procedure. The distensibility index (DI) at 40 mL of inflation at rest was the primary study endpoint.Results: Seven patients (median age: 52.5, range: 44-62) were included between 2014 and 2017. The DI after surgery was the same as the pre-surgery DI. No patient developed symptoms of faecal incontinence or urge to defecate in the three months following the STARR procedure. All patients reported an improvement in their ODS and Kess scores three months after the STARR procedure. No anal sphincter defects were detected by endoanal ultrasound.Conclusion: Anal dilatation did not appear to alter anal distensibility in patients with a normal anal function before the STARR procedure.

Evaluación intraoperatoria de la distensibilidad de la unión gastroesofágica en fundoplicatura antireflujo / Intraoperative assessment of the distensibility of the gastroesophageal junction in antireflux fundoplication

Introducción: La alteración de la distensibilidad de la unión gastro esofágica (UGE) es un factor etiológico para la enfermedad de reflujo gastroesofágico. El incremento de la distensibilidad permite el reflujo de contenido gástrico incrementa las relajaciones transitorias del esfínter, el número de reflujos y la exposición al ácido. Ha sido descrito que la UGE puede ser calibrada en el acto operatorio utilizando sonda balón, que permite una medida en tiempo real de la capacidad, diámetro y presión de la UGE. Objetivos: evaluar la utilidad de la medida de la distensibilidad de la UGE como predictor de éxito en fundoplicatura laparoscópica (FPL) mediante el uso de la sonda Endoflip ® (Crospon) utilizada intra operatoriamente en pacientes sometidos a FPL como tratamiento anti reflujo practicando mediciones antes y después de la plicatura. Materiales y métodos: La FP se realizó según técnica de Toupet. Se tomaron medidas de distensión del balón con llenado de 40 ml de solución salina 0,2% a) después de la inducción de la anestesia b) después de la reparación de la crura y c) al finalizar el arropado. Los datos fueron analizados por t students. P<0,05 fue considerado significativo. Resultados: Fueron evaluados 9 pacientes, el promedio de edad fue de 45,2; en todos los pacientes existía indicación de cirugía, todos presentaban hernia hiatal. La FPL redujo el promedio de distensibilidad de la UGE de 52,8 mm2/mmHg a 29,8 mm2/mmHg (p=0,0021, (43,5%). Conclusión: Este método permite tomar decisiones en cirugía de la UGE donde el valor objetivo de la distensibilidad puede definir el éxito de la cirugía y evitar eventos adversos post operatorios.

Introduction: The altered distensibility of the gastro esophageal junction (GEJ) is recognized as a primary pathophysiologic factor in the development of gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The increase in GEJ distensibility allows reflux of large volumes of gastric contents into the esophagus, increases transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and increases the number of reflux and esophageal exposure to acid. Moreover, other pathologies with functional obstruction of the GEJ as achalasia have very little distensibility. Recently was reported that GEJ can be calibrated during surgery using balloon catheter, allowing real-time measurement of capacity, diameter and GEJ pressure during surgery. Objectives: To review the usefulness of the measurement of the distensibility of the GEJ as a predictor of success in laparoscopic fundoplication (LP) using Endoflip® commercial catheter, used intra-operatively in patients undergoing LP anti reflux surgery practicing measurements before and after plication. Material and Methods: The Toupet Fundoplication (TFP) was performed under standard technique, balloon distension measurements were taken, filling with 40 ml of 0.2% saline solution as specified by the manufacturer: a) after induction of anesthesia and once the pneumo peritoneum was stabilized b) After repairing the crura of the diaphragm and c) after the wrapping. Data was analyzed by students t P <0.05 and was considered significant. Results: A total of 9 patients (6 men), age average was 45.2 (32-72), all patients had previous functional and endoscopic studies and surgical indication existed, they all had a diagnosis of hiatal hernia, they all signed informed consent. No patient had postoperative complications. The Toupet Fundoplication (TFP) significantly reduced average GEJ distensibility to 40 ml of 52.8 to 29.8 mm2/mmHg mm2/mmHg (p = 0.0021, which represents a reduction of 43.5%). Conclusion: This method allows the gastro surgical team to make decisions on GEJ surgery in which the target value of distensibility can define the success of the surgery and avoid postoperative adverse events.