Comparison of extended totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) vs intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for management of primary and incisional hernia in terms of early outcomes and cost effectiveness-a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are no randomized controlled trials comparing the eTEP with IPOM repair and this randomized study was designed to compare the two techniques in terms of early pain, cost effectiveness, and quality of life. METHOD: This was a prospective randomized trial with intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was immediate post-operative pain scores. Operative time, conversions, peri operative morbidity, hospital stay, return to daily activities, incremental cost effectiveness ratio and quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF) were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized equally. Early post-operative pain scores and seroma rates were significantly lower and with a significantly earlier return to activity in eTEP group (p value < 0.05). With negative costs and positive effects, eTEP group was 2.4 times more cost effective. CONCLUSION: eTEP repair is better in terms of lesser early post-operative pain, earlier return to activities and cost effectiveness in small and medium size defects.

A propensity-score matched analysis of ventral-TAPP vs. laparoscopic IPOM for small and mid-sized ventral hernias. Comparison of perioperative data, surgical outcome and cost-effectiveness.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic techniques have been used and refined in hernia surgery for several years. The aim of this study was to compare an established method such as laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh repair (lap. IPOM) with ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Patch Plasty (ventral-TAPP) in abdominal wall hernia repair. METHODS: Patient-related data of 180 laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs between June 2014 and August 2020 were extracted from our prospectively maintained database. Of these patients, 34 underwent ventral-TAPP and 146 lap. IPOM. After excluding hernias with a defect size > 5 cm and obtaining balanced groups with propensity-score matching, a comparative analysis was performed in terms perioperative data, surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Propensity-score matching suggested 27 patients in each of the two cohorts. The statistical evaluation showed that intake of opiates was significantly higher in the lap. IPOM group compared to ventral-TAPP patients (p = 0.001). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after lap. IPOM repair was significantly higher at movement (p = 0.008) and at rest (p = 0.023). Also, maximum subjective pain during hospital stay was significantly higher in the lap. IPOM group compared to ventral-TAPP patients (p = 0.004). No hernia recurrence was detected in either group. The material costs of ventral-TAPP procedure (34.37 ± 0.47 €) were significantly lower than those of the lap. IPOM group (742.57 ± 128.44 € p = 0.001). The mean operation time was 65.19 ± 26.43 min in the lap. IPOM group and 58.65 ± 18.43 min in the ventral-TAPP cohort. Additionally, the length of hospital stay in the lap. IPOM cohort was significantly longer (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Ventral-TAPP procedures represent an alternative technique to lap. IPOM repair to reduce the risk of complications related to intra-peritoneal position of mesh and fixating devices. In addition, our study showed that postoperative pain level, material costs and hospital stay of the ventral-TAPP cohort are significantly lower compared to lap. IPOM patients.

Assessment of ideal ratio of mesh area to number of fixation tacks in laparoscopic ventral and incisional IPOM Plus hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: To clarify the optimum mesh-tack ratio MTR (mesh area in cm2 divided by the number of fixation tacks) in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair, we compared IPOM Plus procedures with more intensive mesh fixation to those with standard mesh fixation. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 84 patients (mean hernia width 6.6 ± 4.4 cm) intraoperatively received an intensive mesh fixation I-IPOM Plus with MTR ≤ 4:1 (e.g. ,150 cm2 mesh fixed by 50 tacks) and 74 patients (mean hernia width 6.7 ± 3.4 cm) received a standard mesh fixation S-IPOM Plus with MTR > 4:1 (e.g., 150 cm2 mesh fixed by 30 tacks) at a community hospital between 2014 and 2017. Outcomes in recurrence rates, immediate and chronic postoperative pain, as well as long-term functionality of the abdominal wall were then evaluated. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up time of 34 months, a 2.3% recurrence rate in I-IPOM Plus patients and a 13.5% recurrence rate in S-IPOM Plus patients were recorded (p = 0.018). The recurrence was associated with large hernia > 10 cm (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.4) and MTR > 5 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-3.8) in the multivariate analysis. There was a positive correlation between immediate postoperative pain intensity measured on day 7 and number of fixation tacks placed (I-IPOM Plus: mean 4.5 ± 2.5 VAS versus S-IPOM Plus: mean 2.7 ± 2.0 VAS, p = 0.001). However, there were no outcome differences in terms of length of immediate postoperative pain experience, sick leave duration, chronic pain rate and long-term abdominal wall functionality between these two groups. CONCLUSION: For ventral and incisional hernia patients with multiple recurrence risk factors, a mesh-tack ratio MTR ≤ 4:1 should be applied in laparoscopic IPOM Plus procedures.

[Minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: apply or save?] / Maloinvazivnye tekhnologii v gerniologii: primenyat' nel'zya ekonomit'.

Treatment of patients with ventral hernias remains one of the most pressing problems of abdominal surgery. Surgeons are trying to find a «gold standard¼ for the treatment of this pathology. Great hopes are placed on minimally invasive techniques, however, due to their high cost, they do not yet find mass distribution in everyday practice. In our opinion, this is short-sighted. We tried to analyze the feasibility of using minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of patients with ventral hernias of various locations, from the position of clinical and economic efficiency.