Emergency Medical Services Protocols for Assessment and Treatment of Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs) represent a growing population presenting to Emergency Medical Services (EMS), but little is known about their prehospital care. This study aimed to characterize current EMS protocols in the United States for patients with VADs. METHODS: States with state-wide EMS protocols were included. Protocols were obtained from the state EMS website. If not available, the office of the state medical director was contacted. For each state, protocols were analyzed for patient and VAD assessment and treatment variables. RESULTS: Of 32 states with state-wide EMS protocols, 21 had VAD-specific protocols. With 17 (81%) states noting a pulse may not be palpable, protocols recommended assessing alternate measures of perfusion and mean arterial pressure (MAP; 15 [71%]). Assessment of VAD was advised through listening for pump hum (20 [95%]) and alarms (20 [95%]) and checking the power supply (15 [71%]). For treatment, EMS prehospital consultation was required to begin chest compression in three (14%) states, and mechanical (device) chest compressions were not permitted in two (10%) states. Contact information for VAD coordinator was listed in a minority of five (24%) states. Transport of VAD equipment/backup bag was advised in 18 (86%) states. DISCUSSION: This national analysis of EMS protocols found VAD-specific EMS protocols are not universally adopted in the United States and are variable when implemented, highlighting a need for VAD teams to partner with EMS agencies to inform standardized protocols that optimize these patients' care.

Assessment of Temporary Warfarin Reversal in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the KVAD Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) require interruption of warfarin for invasive procedures, but parenteral bridging is associated with many complications. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) can temporarily restore hemostasis in patients undergoing anticoagulation with warfarin. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study evaluated the strategy of using variable-dose 4F-PCC to immediately and temporarily reverse warfarin before invasive procedures without holding warfarin in patients with LVADs. The duration of effect of 4F-PCC on factor levels and time to reestablish therapeutic anticoagulation post procedure were assessed. METHODS: Adult patients with LVADs and planned invasive procedures were enrolled from a single center. Warfarin was continued uninterrupted. The 4F-PCC dose administered immediately pre-procedure was based on study protocol. International normalized ratio (INR)- and vitamin K-dependent factor levels were collected before and during the 48 hours after 4F-PCC administration. The use of parenteral bridging, International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) and thromboembolic events at 7 and 30 days were collected. RESULTS: In 21 episodes of 4F-PCC reversal, median baseline INR was 2.7 (IQR 2.2-3.2). The median dosage of 4F-PCC administered was 1794 units (IQR 1536-2130). At 24 and 48 hours post 4F-PCC administration, median INRs were 1.8 (IQR 1.7-2.0) and 2.0 (IQR 1.9-2.4). Two patients required postoperative bridging. One patient experienced major bleeding within 72 hours, and 2 experienced CRNMB within 30 days. There were no thromboembolic events. Baseline and post 4F-PCC vitamin K-dependent factor levels corresponded with changes in INR values. The median time to achieve therapeutic INR post-procedure was 2.5 days (IQR, 1-4). CONCLUSION: Administration of 4F-PCC for temporary reversal of warfarin for invasive procedures in patients with LVADs allowed for continued warfarin dosing with minimal use of post-intervention bridging, limited bleeding and no thromboembolic events.

Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has significantly increased in the last years, trying to offer a therapeutic alternative to heart transplantation, in light also to the significant heart donor shortage compared to the growing advanced heart failure population. Despite technological improvements in the devices, LVAD-related mortality is still fairly high, with right heart failure being one of the predominant predictors. Therefore, many efforts have been made toward a thorough right ventricular (RV) evaluation prior to LVAD implant, considering clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic parameters. However, there is high heterogeneity regarding both which predictor is the strongest as well as the relative cut-off values, and a consensus has not been reached yet, increasing the risk of facing patients in which the distinction between good or poor RV function cannot be surely reached. In parallel, due to technological development and availability of mechanical circulatory support of the RV, LVADs are being considered even in patients with suboptimal RV function. The aim of our review is to analyze the current evidence regarding the role of RV function prior to LVAD and its evaluation, pointing out the extreme variability in parameters that are currently assessed and future prospective regarding new diagnostic tools. Finally, we attempt to gather the available information on the therapeutic strategies to use in the peri-operative phase, in order to reduce the incidence of RV failure, especially in patients in which the preoperative evaluation highlighted some conflicting results with regard to ventricular function.

Assessment of Autophagy Markers Suggests Increased Activity Following LVAD Therapy.

Left ventricular reverse remodeling in heart failure is associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, the molecular features that drive this process are poorly defined. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are the therapy associated with the greatest reverse remodeling and lead to partial myocardial recovery in most patients. In this study, we examined whether autophagy may be implicated in post-LVAD reverse remodeling. We found expression of key autophagy factors increased post-LVAD, while autophagic substrates decreased. Autolysosome numbers increased post-LVAD, further indicating increased autophagy. These findings support the conclusion that mechanical unloading activates autophagy, which may underly the reverse remodeling observed.

Mechanistic assessment and ablation of left ventricular assist device related ventricular tachycardia in patients with severe heart failure.

Aims: Left-ventricular-assist-devices (lvad) are an established treatment for patients with severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF) and reduce mortality. However, HF patients have significant substrate for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the lvad itself might be pro-arrhythmogenic. We investigated the mechanism of VT in lvad-patients in relation to the underlying etiology and provide in silico and ex-vivo data for ablation in these HF patients. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed invasive electrophysiological (EP) studies of 17 patients with VT and lvad. The mechanism of VT was determined using electroanatomical, entrainment and activation time mapping. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 70% of patients. VT originated from the lvad region in >30%. 1/6 patients with VT originating from the lvad region had episodes before lvad implantation, while 7/11 patients with VT originating from other regions had episodes before implantation. Number and time of radiofrequency (RF)-ablation lesions were not different between VTs originating from the lvad or other regions. Long-term freedom from VT was 50% upon ablation in patients with VT originating from the lvad region and 64% if ablation was conducted in other regions. To potentially preemptively mitigate lvad related VT in patients undergoing lvad implantation, we obtained in silico derived data and performed ex-vivo experiments targeting ventricular myocardium. Of the tested settings, application of 25 W for 30 s was safe and associated with optimal lesion characteristics. Conclusion: A significant percentage of patients with lvad undergoing VT ablation exhibit arrhythmia originating in close vicinity to the device and recurrence rates are high. Based on in silico and ex-vivo data, we propose individualized RF-ablation in selected patients at risk for/with lvad related VT.

Quantitative Assessment of Aortic Hemodynamics for Varying Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Graft Angles and Flow Pulsation.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) comprise a primary treatment choice for advanced heart failure patients. Treatment with LVAD is commonly associated with complications like stroke and gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding, which adversely impacts treatment outcomes, and causes fatalities. The etiology and mechanisms of these complications can be linked to the fact that LVAD outflow jet leads to an altered state of hemodynamics in the aorta as compared to baseline flow driven by aortic jet during ventricular systole. Here, we present a framework for quantitative assessment of aortic hemodynamics in LVAD flows realistic human vasculature, with a focus on quantifying the differences between flow driven by LVAD jet and the physiological aortic jet when no LVAD is present. We model hemodynamics in the aortic arch proximal to the LVAD outflow graft, as well as in the abdominal aorta away from the LVAD region. We characterize hemodynamics using quantitative descriptors of flow velocity, stasis, helicity, vorticity and mixing, and wall shear stress. These are used on a set of 27 LVAD scenarios obtained by parametrically varying LVAD outflow graft anastomosis angles, and LVAD flow pulse modulation. Computed descriptors for each of these scenarios are compared against the baseline flow, and a detailed quantitative characterization of the altered state of hemodynamics due to LVAD operation (when compared to baseline aortic flow) is compiled. These are interpreted using a conceptual model for LVAD flow that distinguishes between flow originating from the LVAD outflow jet (and its impingement on the aorta wall), and flow originating from aortic jet during aortic valve opening in normal physiological state.

Cardiac output assessment methods in left ventricular assist device patients: A problem of heteroscedasticity.

Equipoise remains about how best to measure cardiac output (CO) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). In this study, direct Fick CO was compared with thermodilution (TD) and indirect Fick (iFick) CO in 61 LVAD patients. TD and LaFarge iFick showed moderate correlation with direct Fick (R2 = 0.49 and R2 = 0.38, p < 0.001 for both), while Dehmer and Bergstra iFick showed poor correlation with direct Fick (R2 = 0.29 and R2 = 0.31, p < 0.001 for both). Absolute bias between all CO estimation techniques and direct Fick CO was lowest for TD compared to iFick methods but significant for all methods. All methods tended to overestimate CO compared to direct Fick, with greatest overestimation present in those with the lowest measured direct Fick CO. Bias and frequency of significant discrepancy were least using TD and Lafarge iFick CO estimation methods in this study, with TD CO demonstrating modestly better correlation and less heteroscedasticity compared to Lafarge.

Data-driven monitoring in patients on left ventricular assist device support.

INTRODUCTION: Despite an increasing population of patients supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), it remains a complex therapy, and patients are frequently admitted. Therefore, a strict follow-up including frequent hospital visits, patient self-management and telemonitoring is needed. AREAS COVERED: The current review describes the principles of LVADs, the possibilities of (tele)monitoring using noninvasive and invasive devices. Furthermore, possibilities, challenges, and future perspectives in this emerging field are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Several studies described initial experiences on telemonitoring in LVAD patients, using mobile phone applications to collect clinical data and pump data. This may replace frequent hospital visits in near future. In addition, algorithms were developed aiming to early detect pump thrombosis or driveline infections. Since not all complications are reflected by pump parameters, data from different sources should be combined to detect a broader spectrum of complications in an early stage. We need to focus on the development of sophisticated but understandable algorithms and infrastructure combining different data sources, while addressing essential aspects such as data safety, privacy, and cost-effectiveness.

Incremental cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation as a bridge to cardiac transplant or left ventricular assist device placement in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

Objective: Emerging literature has described using venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. We sought to identify the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ECMO used as a bridge to cardiac transplant or LVAD. Methods: Patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who received venoarterial ECMO and were bridged to either cardiac transplant (n = 7) or a HeartMate 3 LVAD (n = 6) placement were included. Markov modeling was used, comparing ECMO bridging with non-ECMO-bridged patients. Cohorts entered the model alive and at every 1-year cycle, were exposed to risk of death, and ran forward for 20 years after transplant or LVAD. Results: Patients bridged with ECMO to cardiac transplant were stratified as group 1 whereas those bridged with ECMO to LVAD were stratified as group 2. The average ECMO run was 3 days in group 1 versus 11 days in group 2. Among group 1 patients, the ICER was $246,629 but was paired with a longer life expectancy. The ICER of group 2 patients was -$107,088 and was not paired with a longer life expectancy. The average inpatient cost for group 1 was found to be $636,023 versus $769,471 for group 2 patients. The average inpatient costs for patients not bridged to ECMO who received cardiac transplant or LVAD was $538,928 and $325,242, respectively. Conclusions: Using ECMO to bridge to transplant or LVAD placement is not cost effective. However, patients bridged to transplant are paired with longer life expectancy in contrast to patients bridged to LVAD.

Left ventricular assist devices: A historical perspective at the intersection of medicine and engineering.

Over the last half-century, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has progressed from conceptual therapy for failed cardiopulmonary bypass weaning to an accepted destination therapy for advanced heart failure. The history of LVAD engineering is defined by an initial development phase, which demonstrated the feasibility of such an approach, to the more recent three major generations of commercial devices. In this review, we explore the engineering challenges of LVADs, how they were addressed over time, and the clinical outcomes that resulted from each major technological development. The first generation of commercial LVADs were pulsatile devices, which lacked the appropriate durability due to their number of moving components and hemocompatibility. The second generation of LVADs was defined by replacement of complex, pulsatile pumps with primarily axial, continuous-flow systems with an impeller in the blood passageway. These devices experienced significant commercial success, but the presence of excessive trauma to the blood and in-situ bearing resulted in an unacceptable burden of adverse events. Third generation centrifugal-flow pumps use magnetically suspended rotors within the pump chamber. Superior outcomes with this newest generation of devices have been observed, particularly with respect to hemocompatibility-related adverse events including pump thrombosis, with fully magnetically levitated devices. The future of LVAD engineering includes wireless charging foregoing percutaneous drivelines and more advanced pump control mechanisms, including synchronization of the pump flow with the native cardiac cycle, and varying pump output based on degree of physical exertion using sensor or advanced device-level data triggers.

Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and End-stage Renal Disease and Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device: Insights From the United States Renal Data System Database.

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5 and CKD stage 5 on dialysis (end-stage renal disease [ESRD]). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD and a 5% sample of patients with CKD with an LVAD (2006-2018) to determine 1-year outcomes using the United States Renal Data System database. The LVAD implantation, comorbidities, and outcomes were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th edition codes. We identified 496 patients with CKD and 95 patients with ESRD who underwent LVAD implantation. The patients with ESRD were younger (59 years vs 66 years; P < .001), had more Blacks (40% vs 24.6%, P = .009), compared with the CKD group. The 1-year mortality (49.5% vs 30.9%, P < .001) and index mortality (27.4% vs 16.7%, P = .014) rates were higher for patients with ESRD. A subgroup analysis showed significantly higher mortality in ESRD vs CKD 3 (49.5% vs 30.2%, adjusted P = .009), but no significant difference in mortality between stage 3 vs 4/5 (30.2% vs 30.8%, adjusted P = .941). There was no significant difference in secondary outcomes (bleeding, stroke, and sepsis/infection) during follow-up between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD undergoing LVAD implantation had significantly higher index and 1-year mortality rates compared with patients with CKD.

A clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device for transplant-ineligible patients: A United Kingdom perspective.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy for patients with advanced heart failure (HF) who are ineligible for heart transplantation is debated in the UK. This study develops an indirect comparison between the fully magnetically levitated HeartMate 3 (HM 3) LVAD and medical therapy (MT) to evaluate expected clinical and cost-effectiveness in the UK National Health Service (NHS) context. METHODS: We performed an economic analysis comparing the HM3 pump against the HeartMate II LVAD (MOMENTUM 3), and then another analysis comparing MT with the first- and second-generation HeartMate XVE pump LVAD and HeartMate II LVAD for the same patient population (REMATCH and ROADMAP, respectively). By bridging those 2 analyses, an indirect comparison between HM3 and MT in the form of a network meta-analysis was developed. A literature search was performed to select the most appropriate pair of studies for this purpose. Outcomes were adjusted to produce Kaplan-Meier curves for the cost-effectiveness evaluation by using a decision-analytic model. Data were extrapolated linearly over a 5-year time horizon. Uncertainty and additional scenarios were addressed by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Local costs and health utility were used from England, thereby representing the UK context. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for LVAD vs MT in transplant ineligible patients with advanced HF was estimated to be £47,361 per quality-adjusted life year gained, with a 97.1% probability of being cost-effective at £50,000. In a subgroup of patients who are inotropic therapy dependent (INTERMACS 1-3 severity profile), the ICER was £45,616, while for a population with less-ill ambulatory HF (INTERMACS profile 4-7) the ICER changed to £64,051. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that HM3 LVAD therapy in advanced HF patients ineligible for heart transplantation may be cost-effective compared to MT in the NHS UK-England context. The ICER is lowest for patients dependent on inotropic support, but exceeds the willingness to pay threshold of £50,000 in ambulatory noninotropic therapy dependent advanced HF patients.

Assessment of U.S. heart transplantation equity as a function of race: Observational analyses of the OPTN database.

Background: Racial disparities in heart transplantation (HT) outcomes are suspected but uncertain. The additional impact of a recent change in donor allocation on disparities in HT in the United States (US) is unknown. We hypothesize racial disparities in HT are present and may be worsened by new allocation practices. Methods: Cohort: Adults listed for HT before and after a heart allocation policy change (Era 1: Oct 18th, 2015 - Oct 18th, 2018, Era 2: Oct 18th, 2018-June 30, 2021). The primary outcome was the rate of HT by race (Black vs. White), assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis (compete: waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration). Final adjusted models included co-morbidities, SES and community-level Social Determinants of Health. The secondary outcome was waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration. Results: Of 17,384 waitlist candidates (Era 1: 9,150, Era 2: 8,234), Black waitlist candidates had a lower rate of HT compared to White waitlist candidates in Era 1 (adjusted HR 0·90, 95 % CI 0·84-0·97, p = 0·0053) and in Era 2 (adjusted HR 0·81, 95 % CI 0·75-0·88, p <0·0001, era race interaction p=0·056). The rate of waitlist removal for death or deterioration was similar between races in Era 1 (adjusted HR 0·92, 95 % 0·77-1·1, p = 0·38), but increased for Black candidates in Era 2 (adjusted HR 1·34, 95 % CI 1·09-1·65, p = 0·0054, era race interaction p = 0·0051). Interpretation: Both the measured rate of transplantation and rate of delisting for death or clinical deterioration have worsened for Black compared to White waitlist candidates under the new allocation system. Causes for these disparities require further study. Funding: University of Minnesota Department of Cardiology funds.

Hemodynamic Assessment of Dual Obstructive Left Ventricular Assist Device Lesions.

Obstructive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) lesions are uncommon but are being increasingly recognized, particularly with the increased use of advanced imaging modalities. While heart failure symptoms and LVAD power fluctuations have a broad differential, obstructive lesions in the LVAD circuit should be considered. We present a unique case of a patient supported on HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic Inc., Dublin, Ireland) therapy, who experienced postural dizziness with objective orthostatic hypotension and occasional ventricular tachycardia. With fluctuations in LVAD flow and power, a CT scan with three-dimensional reconstruction was obtained showing outflow graft kinking. The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for investigation and consideration of outflow graft intervention. However, intracardiac echocardiography revealed the presence of an inflow cannula obstruction with position changes and catheter interrogation involving the outflow cannula suggestive of a gradient across the kinked area as an unlikely cause for the presentation. This case highlights the importance of a thorough interrogation for obstructive lesions in the setting of heart failure symptoms, particularly postural symptoms, in a patient on LVAD therapy, even when not identified on routine echocardiography.

Validation of a Miniaturized Test Loop for the Assessment of Human Blood Damage by Continuous-Flow Left-Ventricular Assist Devices.

Despite improved hemocompatibility of left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs), assessment of blood damage remains mandatory in preclinical testing as standardized by ASTM-F1841. The most relevant test fluid is fresh, non-pooled human blood, but the limited volume of a standard donation requires significantly smaller loops than those commonly used with animal blood. In a recent study with porcine blood, we verified a miniaturized test loop with only 160 mL for the ASTM-conform paired testing of at least two LVADs and a static reference. Here, we validated this mini test loop for standardized assessment of blood damage with one 450-mL single donation of fresh human blood. Blood damage was assessed for HeartMate 3 and BPX-80 in 9 experiments with heparinized human blood for 6 hours. We analyzed plasma free hemoglobin, von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentration and collagen-binding functionality and calculated indices of hemolysis and vWF-ratios. Overall, we observed less blood damage compared to our previous study; however, the differences in mean indices of hemolysis and in mean normalized vWF-ratio between BPX-80 and HeartMate 3 were consistent for human blood. Thus, our mini test loop proved to be valid for preclinical standardized assessment of blood damage with only 450 mL of fresh human blood.

A varied approach to left ventricular assist device follow-up improves cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation improves outcomes in advanced heart failure, however, the optimal frequency of outpatient assessments to improve cost-effectiveness and potentially avert readmissions is unclear. METHODS: To test if varying the frequency of follow-up after LVAD implantation reduces readmissions and improves cost-effectiveness, a less intensive follow-up (LIFU) strategy with scheduled visits at 1 month and then every 6 months was compared to an intensive follow-up (IFU) group with scheduled visits at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and then every 3 months post-implant. We developed a decision-tree model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different follow-up schedules at 3, 6, and 12-months. The readmission rates for LIFU and IFU, along with the associated costs, were estimated using data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Databases (2015-2018). A total of 349 patients were enrolled, with 193 and 156 in the IFU and LIFU groups. RESULTS: Patients with IFU were found to have a lower risk for readmission at 3 months (HR: 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.79), but this difference diminished overtime at 6 months (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96) and 12 months (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-1.06). The incremental net benefit of IFU, when compared with LIFU, is greatest in the first 3 months and also diminishes over time (3 months: $19616, 6 months $9257, 12 months $717). CONCLUSIONS: An initial IFU strategy, followed by a period of de-escalation at the 6-month post-implant mark in lower-risk patients, may be a more cost-effective strategy to provide follow-up care while not predisposing patients to a higher risk of readmission.

Nutritional assessment and comparison of nutritional indices in predicting adverse outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative malnutrition has been correlated to postoperative complications in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We sought to determine whether nutritional risk scores could identify a subset of patients with an LVAD who were at high risk of adverse events. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing LVAD placement at a single center. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI), and nutrition risk in the critically ill (NUTRIC) score were calculated retrospectively from data abstracted from chart review. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality and other adverse events associated with LVAD implantation. We used χ2 or Fisher exact tests to compare these three indices against the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with a mean age of 57.2 ± 13.7 y and a mean body mass index of 29.3 ± 6.3 kg/m2 underwent LVAD placement between 2011 and 2019. The composite outcome at 1 y occurred in 31 (76%) patients. Preoperatively, 3 patients were identified as at high nutritional risk by the PNI score and 39 by the NRI score but none by the NUTRIC score. Most patients received nutritional interventions. The nutritional risk scores did not differ significantly between patients who experienced the composite outcome and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The NRI, NUTRIC, and PNI scores did not identify a subset of patients at high risk for the composite outcome. Further studies are needed to determine how to better assess the true nutritional risk of the LVAD population. However, until better risk stratification is available, all patients with an LVAD should be consider at high risk and given appropriate nutritional interventions.

Positron emission tomography objective parameters for assessment of left ventricular assist device infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a life-saving therapy, but it poses a substantial infection risk. Current evaluation of LVAD infection with 18F-FDG PET/CT is predominately subjective. We present qualitative and semi-quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters for early detection of LVAD infection and site localization. We retrospectively reviewed all 25 LVAD patients at our institution who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging between 2014 and 2018. LVADs were subdivided into five assessed regions: driveline exit site, subcutaneous driveline, LVAD pump, LVAD inflow, and LVAD outflow cannulae. Ultimate diagnosis of LVAD infection was determined by a multidisciplinary primary care team. Qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of PET/CT data were performed, including calculation of the standardized uptake value maximum, mean, and peak (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak, respectively), as well as metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). A total of 14 patients presented with symptoms of infection, and LVAD infection was ultimately diagnosed in 19 of the 25 cases. All cases were correctly identified on 18F-FDG PET/CT with no false positive and no false negative cases, corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The mean SUVmax range at noninfected sites was 2.5-3.4, and the range was 5.7-8.1 at infected sites, resulting in a significant difference (P < 0.01) at all LVAD regions. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful adjunctive tool for assessment of LVAD infection and infection localization, which is crucial for clinical management. A cut-off SUVmax 5 is recommended to help diagnose LVAD infection.