Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 25(4): 610-613, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541650

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In a real-world trial, we previously demonstrated that Huntsman at Home, a novel oncology hospital at home program, was associated with reduced health care utilization and costs. In this study, we sought to understand the impact of Huntsman at Home in specific patient subgroups defined by sex, age, area-level median income, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and current use of systemic anticancer therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study of the Huntsman Cancer Institute. Electronic Data Warehouse of patients enrolled in Huntsman at Home between August 2018 through October 2019 vs usual-care patients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 169 patients admitted to Huntsman at Home compared with 198 usual-care patients. METHODS: Five dichotomous subgroups evaluated including sex (female vs male), age (≥65 vs <65), income (≥$78,735 vs <$78,735), Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥2 vs <2), and current systemic anticancer therapy use vs no current systemic anticancer therapy. Groups were compared with patients receiving usual care. Primary outcomes included 30-day costs, hospital length of stay, unplanned hospitalizations, and emergency room visits. RESULTS: Admission to Huntsman at Home was associated with an overall reduction across all 4 health care cost and utilization outcomes. Outcomes favoring admission to Huntsman at Home achieved statistical significance (P < .05) in at least 2 of the 4 outcomes for each subgroup studied. Of the subgroups that did not achieve statistically significant benefit from Huntsman at Home admission in some outcome categories, none of these subgroups favored usual care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Admission to Huntsman at Home decreased utilization of unplanned health care and reduced costs across a wide spectrum of patient subgroups, suggesting overall consistent benefit from the service. Hospital at home models should be considered as a means by which the quality and efficiency of care can be maximized for patients with cancer.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hospitais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
2.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res ; 10(2): 104-110, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37954059

RESUMO

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) represents a substantial economic burden for patients in the United States. Patients with advanced or recurrent EC have a much poorer prognosis than patients with early-stage EC. Data on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for patients with advanced or recurrent EC specifically are lacking. Objectives: To describe HCRU and costs associated with first-line (1L) therapy for commercially insured patients with advanced or recurrent EC in the United States. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with advanced or recurrent EC using the MarketScan® database. Treatment characteristics, HCRU, and costs were assessed from the first claim in the patient record for 1L therapy for advanced or recurrent EC (index) until initiation of a new anti-cancer therapy, disenrollment from the database, or the end of data availability. Baseline demographics were determined during the 12 months before the patient's index date. Results: A total of 7932 patients were eligible for inclusion. Overall, mean age at index was 61 years, most patients (77.3%) had received prior surgery for EC, and the most common 1L regimen was carboplatin/paclitaxel (59.1%). During the observation period, most patients had at least one healthcare visit (all-cause, 99.9%; EC-related, 82.8%), most commonly outpatient visits (all-cause, 91.4%; EC-related, 68.7%). The highest mean (SD) costs (US dollars) were for inpatient hospitalization for both all-cause and EC-related events ($8396 [$15,130] and $9436 [$16,784], respectively). Total costs were higher for patients with a diagnosis of metastasis at baseline than for those without a diagnosis of metastasis. Discussion: For patients with advanced or recurrent EC in the United States, 1L therapy is associated with considerable HCRU and economic burden. They are particularly high for patients with metastatic disease. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for new cost-effective treatments for patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent EC.

3.
Afr J AIDS Res ; 21(4): 385-390, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36538539

RESUMO

Background: Globally, efforts to curtail the HIV pandemic are growing. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) and partners set the 95-95-95 targets to be achieved by 2025. Tanzania's ongoing transition from single-month ARV to longer multi-month dispensing (MMD) involves significant planning and shifts in existing resources, including health commodities, clinical staff and storage space. This study aimed at evaluating the costs and efficiency gains of rolling out MMD compared to the prior monthly dispending (MD) standard of care before the new guidelines.Methods: The analysis employed a health provider perspective utilising prior costing data collected to estimate cost of treatment for HIV/AIDS, including salaries, laboratory costs, antiretroviral drugs, other supplies and overhead costs. The projections were run from 2018 to 2030 using the Spectrum package for Tanzania.Results: Our model estimated that total treatment cost without MMD (including salaries, laboratory costs, antiretroviral drugs, other supplies, and overhead costs) is estimated to rise from USD 189 million in 2018 to USD 244 million in 2030. The introduction of a six-month MMD would lead to the total annual facility-based treatment costs being reduced to USD 205 million in 2030. When comparing MD to a six-month MMD, the total savings over the 13-year period would be USD 425 million. The introduction of six-month MMD for stable patients would reduce the average cost from USD 180 to USD 156 per patient per year if stable patients were only required to make six-monthly visit.Conclusions: The introduction of differentiated service delivery models (DSDMs) and MMD is already contributing to significant cost savings for Tanzania and will continue to do so as the country puts more stable patients on MMD. The potential gains from MMD implantation could further be harnessed if retention of treatment and viral suppression monitoring are prioritised.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida , Infecções por HIV , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Tanzânia , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/tratamento farmacológico
4.
J Interprof Care ; : 1-8, 2021 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139943

RESUMO

Our Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice (IPECP) Nexus previously reported significant reductions in Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, hemoglobin A1c levels, and patient charges. This study examines sustainability of these results over two additional years and replication in two subsequent independent patient cohorts. Participants in the sustainability cohort (N = 276) met ≥1 of the following criteria: (a) ≥3 ED visits in first or second half of the year, (b) hemoglobin A1c level ≥ 9, or (c) Length of Stay, Acuity, Comorbidities, and ER (Emergency Room) Visits (LACE) score ≥ 10. Participants in two replicability cohorts (N = 255) and (N = 160) met the same criteria, but the LACE criterion was changed to ≥3 hospitalizations in baseline years. The Nexus, housed in a family medicine (FM) residency clinic, included professionals and students from multiple disciplines. IPECP skills and interventions included communication, team building, and conflict engagement skills training, daily huddles and pre-visit planning, immediate consultations, small teamlet IPECP interactions, and weekly IPECP case conferences for complex patients. Original health improvements and charge reductions were sustained for two additional years for ED visits, hospitalizations, A1c, and patient charges, and replicated in two additional patient cohorts. The IPECP Nexus interventions were associated with Quadruple Aim outcomes while training the next generation of health care professionals.

5.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry ; 62(2): 228-233, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665152

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how behavioral health (BH) conditions affect health care costs of patients with cancer in Japan. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the magnitude of general medical claims expenditures for individuals with cancer who use or do not use BH services in Japan. METHODS: The study used a health insurance claims database for more than 3 million enrollees in Japan. All health plan enrollees (18 y or older) who had tumors without metastasis or metastatic solid tumors defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index were included in the study (n = 20,260). Measurements included total claims expenditures for BH and medical services. RESULTS: The proportion of enrollees using BH services was 12.8%. BH service users accounted for 17.7% of total health service spending. Mean annual cost of total health care services were 1.5 times higher in BH users than those with no BH use, whereas the median was 1.8 times higher. Mean annual medical cost alone for BH users was 1.3 times higher than that for non-BH users, whereas the median was 1.5 times higher. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest the importance for the Japanese medical system to address BH needs of patients with cancer and introduce fiscal efficiencies to cancer care. Strategic implementation of effective integrated care services for patients with cancer should be considered in Japan.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias , Comorbidade , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Japão , Neoplasias/epidemiologia
6.
J Med Econ ; 22(11): 1210-1220, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31456454

RESUMO

Objectives: The aim of this literature review was to provide a comprehensive report on hospital costs, and cost components, for a range of ventral cavity surgical procedures across three regions of focus: (1) Americas, (2) Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), and (3) Asia-Pacific. Methods: A structured search was performed and utilized a combination of controlled vocabulary (e.g., "Hepatectomy", "Colectomy", "Costs and Cost Analysis") and keywords (e.g. "liver resection", "bowel removal", "economics"). Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they reported hospital-related costs associated with the procedures of interest. Cost outcomes included operating room (OR) time costs, total OR costs, ward stay costs, total admission costs, OR cost per minute and ward cost per day. All costs were converted to 2018 USD. Results: Total admission costs were observed to be highest in the Americas, with an average cost of $15,791. The average OR time cost per minute was found to vary by region: $24.83 (Americas), $14.29 (Asia-Pacific), and $13.90 (EMEA). A cost-breakdown demonstrated that OR costs typically comprised close to 50%, or more, of hospital admission costs. This review also demonstrates that decreasing OR time by 30 min provides cost savings approximately equivalent to a 1-day reduction in ward time. Conclusion: This literature review provided a comprehensive assessment of hospital costs across various surgical procedures, approaches, and geographical regions. Our findings indicate that novel processes and healthcare technologies that aim to reduce resources such as operating time and hospital stay, can potentially provide resource savings for hospital payers.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Saúde Global , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Duração da Cirurgia
7.
Int J Audiol ; 57(6): 407-414, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29490519

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the cost and outcome of a community-based hearing screening programme in which village health workers (VHWs) screened children in their homes using a two-step DPOAE screening protocol. Children referred in a second screening underwent tele diagnostic ABR testing in a mobile tele-van using satellite connectivity or at local centre using broadband internet at the rural location. DESIGN: Economic analysis was carried out to estimate cost incurred and outcome achieved for hearing screening, follow-up diagnostic assessment and identification of hearing loss. Two-way sensitivity analysis determined the most beneficial cost-outcome. STUDY SAMPLE: 1335 children under 5 years of age underwent screening by VHWs. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 22 children referred completed the tele diagnostic evaluation. Five children were identified with hearing loss. The cost-outcomes were better when using broadband internet for tele-diagnostics. The use of least expensive human resources and equipment yielded the lowest cost per child screened (Rs.1526; $23; €21). When follow-up expenses were thus maximised, the cost per child was reduced considerably for diagnostic hearing assessment (Rs.102,065; $1532; €1368) and for the cost per child identified (Rs.388,237; $5826; €5204). CONCLUSION: Settings with constrained resources can benefit from a community-based programme integrated with tele diagnostics.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/economia , Testes Auditivos/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Telemedicina/economia , Audiologia/economia , Audiologia/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Testes Auditivos/métodos , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Telemedicina/métodos
8.
Clin Ther ; 39(12): 2355-2365, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29100730

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Few studies have determined the benefits of pharmacist-run clinics within a tertiary institution, and specifically on their capability to improve clinical outcomes as well as reduce the cost of illness. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-managed risk factor management clinic (RFMP) in an acute care setting through the comparison of clinical (improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin level) and cost outcomes with patients receiving usual care. METHODS: This single-center, observational study included patients aged ≥21 years old and diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who received care within the cardiology department of a tertiary institution between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. The intervention group comprised patients who attended the RFMP for 3 to 6 months, and the usual-care group comprised patients who received standard cardiologist care. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were conducted to analyze the clinical and cost outcomes. FINDINGS: A total of 142 patients with DM (71 patients in the intervention group and 71 patients in the usual-care group) with similar baseline characteristics were included. After adjusting for differences in baseline systolic blood pressure and triglyceride levels, the mean reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin level at 6 months from baseline in the intervention group was significantly lower by 0.78% compared with the usual-care group. Patients in the usual-care group had a significantly higher risk of hospital admissions within the 12 months from baseline compared with the intervention group (odds ratio, 3.84 [95% CI, 1.17-12.57]; P = 0.026). Significantly lower mean annual direct medical costs were also observed in the intervention group (US $8667.03 [$17,416.20] vs US $56,665.02 [$127,250.10]; P = 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: The pharmacist-managed RFMP exhibited improved clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs compared with usual care within a tertiary institute.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papel Profissional , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos , Singapura
9.
AJP Rep ; 6(4): e407-e416, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917307

RESUMO

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential impact to the U.S. health care system by adopting a novel test that identifies women at risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed to assess clinical and cost outcomes over a 1-year period. The use of a prognostic test to predict spontaneous preterm birth in a hypothetical population of women reflective of the U.S. population (predictive arm) was compared with the current baseline rate of spontaneous preterm birth and associated infant morbidity and mortality (baseline care arm). Results In a population of 3,528,593 births, our model predicts a 23.5% reduction in infant mortality (8,300 vs. 6,343 deaths) with use of the novel test. The rate of acute conditions at birth decreased from 11.2 to 8.1%; similarly, the rate of developmental disabilities decreased from 13.2 to 11.5%. The rate of spontaneous preterm birth decreased from 9.8 to 9.1%, a reduction of 23,430 preterm births. Direct medical costs savings was $511.7M (- 2.1%) in the first year of life. Discussion The use of a prognostic test for reducing spontaneous preterm birth is a dominant strategy that could reduce costs and improve outcomes. More research is needed once such a test is available to determine if these results are borne out upon real-world use.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA