RESUMO
Trauma-informed care (TIC) initiatives in state child welfare agencies are receiving more attention, but little empirical evidence exists as to their efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in self-reported practices and perceptions of child welfare staff involved in a multifaceted, statewide TIC intervention. Ten child welfare offices were matched and randomized to an early or delayed cohort. Staff were surveyed at Time 1 prior to any intervention, Time 2 postintervention for Cohort 1, and Time 3 postintervention for Cohort 2. The survey covered six domains: trauma screening, case planning, mental health and family involvement, progress monitoring, collaboration, and perceptions of the state's overall system performance. Linear mixed modeling assessed the effect of the intervention. Cohort by time interaction was significant for three intervention targets. We demonstrate, using a rigorous study design, the mixed results of a multimodal intervention to improve trauma-informed attitudes, practices, and system performance. TIC initiatives must account for complex, dynamic contextual factors.
Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Serviços de Proteção Infantil/educação , Proteção da Criança , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adulto , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Cross-Over , HumanosRESUMO
The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N=121 children and adolescents aged 4-17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N=121)=0.689, p=.261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register.
Assuntos
Administração de Caso , Maus-Tratos Infantis/psicologia , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/terapia , Proteção da Criança , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/etiologia , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increased psychophysiological reactivity is a hallmark intermediate phenotype of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Individuals with PTSD exhibit greater skin conductance (SC) responses to trauma scripts than trauma survivors without PTSD. However, trauma scripts require time for development and cannot be easily used in a single visit. Thus, there is a need for a low-cost, easy-to-use, SC recording protocol for PTSD assessment. METHODS: Using a mobile device (eSense) connected to a portable tablet computer, we assessed SC reactivity to a standard trauma interview (STI) in 63 participants recruited from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, approximately 1 year after trauma exposure. SC response (SCR) was calculated by subtracting the SC level (SCL) at the end of the baseline recording from the maximum SCL during the STI. RESULTS: SCL was significantly higher during the STI compared to baseline (P < .001), and individuals with PTSD showed significantly greater SCR than individuals without PTSD (P = .006). Logistic regression using SCR with PTSD diagnosis as the outcome showed an odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11-2.78). Lastly, higher SCR during the STI was also significantly associated with PTSD symptom total score controlling for demographics and trauma severity (b = 0.42, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated feasibility of the use of a mobile device for assessing psychophysiological reactivity in those with PTSD. The use of this low-cost, easy-to-use mobile device to collect objective physiological data in concert with a STI can be easily disseminated in clinical and research settings.
Assuntos
Resposta Galvânica da Pele/fisiologia , Entrevista Psicológica/métodos , Aplicativos Móveis , Monitorização Ambulatorial/métodos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Ambulatorial/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
Policymakers shape implementation and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs), whether they are developing or responding to legislation and policies or negotiating public sector resource constraints. As part of a large mixed-method study, we conducted qualitative interviews with 24 policymakers involved in delivery of the same EBP in two U.S. states. We analyzed transcripts via open and focused coding techniques to identify the commonality, diversity, and complexity of implementation challenges; approaches to overcoming those challenges; and the importance of system-level contextual factors in ensuring successful implementation. Key findings centered on building support and leadership for EBPs; funding and contractual strategies; partnering with stakeholders; tackling challenges via proactive planning and problem solving; and the political, legal, and systemic pressures affecting EBP longevity. The policymaker perspectives offer guidance on nurturing system and organizational practice environments to achieve positive outcomes and for optimally addressing macro-level influences that bear upon the instantiation of EBPs in public sector child welfare systems.