Digital Validation in Breast Cancer Needle Biopsies: Comparison of Histological Grade and Biomarker Expression Assessment Using Conventional Light Microscopy, Whole Slide Imaging, and Digital Image Analysis.

Given the widespread use of whole slide imaging (WSI) for primary pathological diagnosis, we evaluated its utility in assessing histological grade and biomarker expression (ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67) compared to conventional light microscopy (CLM). In addition, we explored the utility of digital image analysis (DIA) for assessing biomarker expression. Three breast pathologists assessed the Nottingham combined histological grade, its components, and biomarker expression through the immunohistochemistry of core needle biopsy samples obtained from 101 patients with breast cancer using CLM, WSI, and DIA. There was no significant difference in variance between the WSI and CLM agreement rates for the Nottingham grade and its components and biomarker expression. Nuclear pleomorphism emerged as the most variable histologic component in intra- and inter-observer agreement (kappa ≤ 0.577 and kappa ≤ 0.394, respectively). The assessment of biomarker expression using DIA achieved an enhanced kappa compared to the inter-observer agreement. Compared to each observer's assessment, DIA exhibited an improved kappa coefficient for the expression of most biomarkers with CLM and WSI. Using WSI to assess prognostic and predictive factors, including histological grade and biomarker expression in breast cancer, is acceptable. Furthermore, incorporating DIA to assess biomarker expression shows promise for substantially enhancing scoring reproducibility.

Digital pathology operations at a tertiary cancer center: Infrastructure requirements and operational cost.

Whole slide imaging is revolutionizing the field of pathology and is currently being used for clinical, educational, and research initiatives by an increasing number of institutions. Pathology departments have distinct needs for digital pathology systems, yet the cost of digital workflows is cited as a major barrier for widespread adoption by many organizations. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) is an early adopter of whole slide imaging with incremental investments in resources that started more than 15 years ago. This experience and the large-scale scan operations led to the identification of required framework components of digital pathology operations. The cost of these components for the 2021 digital pathology operations at MSK were studied and calculated to enable an understanding of the operation and benchmark the accompanying costs. This paper describes the unique infrastructure cost and the costs associated with the digital pathology clinical operation use cases in a large, tertiary cancer center. These calculations can serve as a blueprint for other institutions to provide the necessary concepts and offer insights towards the financial requirements for digital pathology adoption by other institutions.

Contribution of whole slide imaging-based deep learning in the assessment of intraoperative and postoperative sections in neuropathology.

The pathological diagnosis of intracranial germinoma (IG), oligodendroglioma, and low-grade astrocytoma on intraoperative frozen section (IFS) and hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-staining section directly determines patients' treatment options, but it is a difficult task for pathologists. We aimed to investigate whether whole-slide imaging (WSI)-based deep learning can contribute new precision to the diagnosis of IG, oligodendroglioma, and low-grade astrocytoma. Two types of WSIs (500 IFSs and 832 HE-staining sections) were collected from 379 patients at multiple medical centers. Patients at Center 1 were split into the training, testing, and internal validation sets (3:1:1), while the other centers were the external validation sets. First, we subdivided WSIs into small tiles and selected tissue tiles using a tissue tile selection model. Then a tile-level classification model was established, and the majority voting method was used to determine the final diagnoses. Color jitter was applied to the tiles so that the deep learning (DL) models could adapt to the variations in the staining. Last, we investigated the effectiveness of model assistance. The internal validation accuracies of the IFS and HE models were 93.9% and 95.3%, respectively. The external validation accuracies of the IFS and HE models were 82.0% and 76.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the IFS and HE models can predict Ki-67 positive cell areas with R2 of 0.81 and 0.86, respectively. With model assistance, the IFS and HE diagnosis accuracy of pathologists improved from 54.6%-69.7% and 53.5%-83.7% to 87.9%-93.9% and 86.0%-90.7%, respectively. Both the IFS model and the HE model can differentiate the three tumors, predict the expression of Ki-67, and improve the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists. The use of our model can assist clinicians in providing patients with optimal and timely treatment options.

Explainable synthetic image generation to improve risk assessment of rare pediatric heart transplant rejection.

Expert microscopic analysis of cells obtained from frequent heart biopsies is vital for early detection of pediatric heart transplant rejection to prevent heart failure. Detection of this rare condition is prone to low levels of expert agreement due to the difficulty of identifying subtle rejection signs within biopsy samples. The rarity of pediatric heart transplant rejection also means that very few gold-standard images are available for developing machine learning models. To solve this urgent clinical challenge, we developed a deep learning model to automatically quantify rejection risk within digital images of biopsied tissue using an explainable synthetic data augmentation approach. We developed this explainable AI framework to illustrate how our progressive and inspirational generative adversarial network models distinguish between normal tissue images and those containing cellular rejection signs. To quantify biopsy-level rejection risk, we first detect local rejection features using a binary image classifier trained with expert-annotated and synthetic examples. We converted these local predictions into a biopsy-wide rejection score via an interpretable histogram-based approach. Our model significantly improves upon prior works with the same dataset with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 98.84% for the local rejection detection task and 95.56% for the biopsy-rejection prediction task. A biopsy-level sensitivity of 83.33% makes our approach suitable for early screening of biopsies to prioritize expert analysis. Our framework provides a solution to rare medical imaging challenges currently limited by small datasets.

Prior to Implementation of Digital Pathology-Assessment of Expectations among Staff by Means of Normalization Process Theory.

The Region of Southern Denmark is the first in Denmark to implement digital pathology (DIPA), starting at the end of 2020. The DIPA process involves changes in workflow, and the pathologist will have to diagnose based on digital whole slide imaging instead of through the traditional use of the conventional light microscope and glass slides. In addition, in the laboratory, the employees will have to implement one more step to their workflow-scanning of tissue. The aim of our study was to assess the expectations and readiness among employees and management towards the implementation of DIPA, including their thoughts and motivations for starting to use DIPA. We used a mixed-method approach. Based on the findings derived from 18 semi-structured interviews with employees from the region's departments of pathology, we designed a questionnaire, including questions from the normalization measure development tool. The questionnaires were e-mailed to 181 employees. Of these employees, 131 responded to the survey. Overall, they reported feeling sufficiently tech-savvy to be able to use DIPA, and they had high expectations as well as motivation and readiness for the upcoming changes. However, the employees were skeptical regarding the allocation of resources, and few were aware of reports about the effects of DIPA. Based on the findings, it seems to be important to provide not only a thorough introduction to the new intervention and the changes it will entail, but also to continue to ensure that the staff know how it works and why it is necessary to implement.

End-to-end interstitial fibrosis assessment of kidney biopsies with a machine learning-based model.

BACKGROUND: The extent of interstitial fibrosis in the kidney not only correlates with renal function at the time of biopsy but also predicts future renal outcome. However, its assessment by pathologists lacks good agreement. The aim of this study is to construct a machine learning-based model that enables automatic and reliable assessment of interstitial fibrosis in human kidney biopsies. METHODS: Validated cortex, glomerulus and tubule segmentation algorithms were incorporated into a single model to assess the extent of interstitial fibrosis. The model performances were compared with expert renal pathologists and correlated with patients' renal functional data. RESULTS: Compared with human raters, the model had the best agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.90] to the reference in 50 test cases. The model also had a low mean bias and the narrowest 95% limits of agreement. The model was robust against colour variation on images obtained at different times, through different scanners, or from outside institutions with excellent ICCs of 0.92-0.97. The model showed significantly better test-retest reliability (ICC 0.98) than humans (ICC 0.76-0.94) and the amount of interstitial fibrosis inferred by the model strongly correlated with 405 patients' serum creatinine (r = 0.65-0.67) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.74 to -0.76). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a trained machine learning-based model can faithfully simulate the whole process of interstitial fibrosis assessment, which traditionally can only be carried out by renal pathologists. Our data suggested that such a model may provide more reliable results, thus enabling precision medicine.

Colorimetrical uncertainty estimation for the performance assessment of whole slide imaging scanners.

Purpose: Whole slide imaging (WSI) scanners produce tissue slide images with a large field of view and a high resolution for pathologists to use in diagnoses. Color performance tests of these color imaging devices are necessary and can use stained tissue slides if the color truth is established using a hyperspectral imaging microscopy system (HIMS). The purpose of this study was to estimate the reproducibility uncertainty of CIELAB coordinates for a reference tissue slide measured by both the HIMS and a WSI scanner. Approach: We compared the color performances of the WSI scanner to those of the reference established by the HIMS using the International Commission on Illumination (Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage, or CIE) 1976 Δ E a b * color difference with the just noticeable color difference (JNCD, Δ E a b * ≤ 2 ), and the results from the overlap of the CIELAB coordinates' uncertainty within the error bar, with a coverage factor k = 2 . The reported uncertainty results from measurements and image registration uncertainties. Results: For the blank area common to the HIMS and the WSI average images, the color agreement was higher using the JNCD condition versus the CIELAB uncertainty overlap criterion (82% and 20% of the pixels in the images, respectively). This difference is explained by the fact that numerous pixels have CIELAB coordinates near one another but corresponding to CIELAB uncertainty values small enough not to overlap. In the colored area of the images, the JNCD condition was met for 0.19% of the pixels in the images, compared with 4.3% for the CIELAB uncertainty overlap criterion. Conclusions: The distribution of uncertainties on the CIELAB coordinates was broader for the HIMS compared with the WSI scanner. The WSI scanner had a systemic error in the color reproduction, which pointed to a potential inadequate color calibration of this device.

Comparative Assessment of Digital Pathology Systems for Primary Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing interest in whole-slide imaging (WSI) over optical microscopy (OM), limited information on comparative assessment of various digital pathology systems (DPSs) is available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive evaluation was undertaken to investigate the technical performance-assessment and diagnostic accuracy of four DPSs with an objective to establish the noninferiority of WSI over OM and find out the best possible DPS for clinical workflow. RESULTS: A total of 2376 digital images, 15,775 image reads (OM - 3171 + WSI - 12,404), and 6100 diagnostic reads (OM - 1245, WSI - 4855) were generated across four DPSs (coded as DPS: 1, 2, 3, and 4) using a total 240 cases (604 slides). Onsite technical evaluation revealed successful scan rate: DPS3 < DPS2 < DPS4 < DPS1; mean scanning time: DPS4 < DPS1 < DPS2 < DPS3; and average storage space: DPS3 < DPS2 < DPS1 < DPS4. Overall diagnostic accuracy, when compared with the reference standard for OM and WSI, was 95.44% (including 2.48% minor and 2.08% major discordances) and 93.32% (including 4.28% minor and 2.4% major discordances), respectively. The difference between the clinically significant discordances by WSI versus OM was 0.32%. Major discordances were observed mostly using DPS4 and least in DPS1; however, the difference was statistically insignificant. Almost perfect (κ ≥ 0.8)/substantial (κ = 0.6-0.8) inter/intra-observer agreement between WSI and OM was observed for all specimen types, except cytology. Overall image quality was best for DPS1 followed by DPS4. Mean digital artifact rate was 6.8% (163/2376 digital images) and maximum artifacts were noted in DPS2 (n = 77) followed by DPS3 (n = 36). Most pathologists preferred viewing software of DPS1 and DPS2. CONCLUSION: WSI was noninferior to OM for all specimen types, except for cytology. Each DPS has its own pros and cons; however, DPS1 closely emulated the real-world clinical environment. This evaluation is intended to provide a roadmap to pathologists for the selection of the appropriate DPSs while adopting WSI.

The utility of digital pathology in improving the diagnostic skills of pathology trainees in commonly encountered pigmented cutaneous lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A single academic institution experience.

Digital pathology has become an integral part of pathology education in recent years, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, for its potential utility as a teaching tool that augments the traditional 1-to-1 sign-out experience. Herein, we evaluate the utility of whole slide imaging (WSI) in reducing diagnostic errors in pigmented cutaneous lesions by pathology fellows without subspecialty training in dermatopathology. Ten cases of 4 pigmented cutaneous lesions commonly encountered by general pathologists were selected. Corresponding whole slide images were distributed to our fellows, along with two sets of online surveys, each composed of 10 multiple-choice questions with 4 answers. Identical cases were used for both surveys to minimize variability in trainees' scores depending on the perceived level of difficulty, with the second set being distributed after random shuffling. Brief image-based teaching slides as self-assessment tool were provided to trainees between each survey. Pre- and post-self-assessment scores were analyzed. 61% (17/28) and 39% (11/28) of fellows completed the first and second surveys, respectively. The mean score in the first survey was 5.2/10. The mean score in the second survey following self-assessment increased to 7.2/10. 64% (7/11) of trainees showed an improvement in their scores, with 1 trainee improving his/her score by 8 points. No fellow scored less post-self-assessment than on the initial assessment. The difference in individual scores between two surveys was statistically significant (p = 0.003). Our study demonstrates the utility of WSI-based self-assessment learning as a source of improving diagnostic skills of pathology trainees in a short period of time.

Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements.

OBJECTIVES: The Ki-67 proliferation index is integral to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) assessment. Automated Ki-67 measurement would aid clinical workflows, but adoption has lagged owing to concerns of nonequivalency. We sought to address this concern by comparing 2 digital image analysis (DIA) platforms to manual counting with same-case/different-hotspot and same-hotspot/different-methodology concordance assessment. METHODS: We assembled a cohort of GEP-NETs (n = 20) from 16 patients. Two sets of Ki-67 hotspots were manually counted by three observers and by two DIA platforms, QuantCenter and HALO. Concordance between methods and observers was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measures. For each comparison pair, the number of cases within ±0.2xKi-67 of its comparator was assessed. RESULTS: DIA Ki-67 showed excellent correlation with manual counting, and ICC was excellent in both within-hotspot and case-level assessments. In expert-vs-DIA, DIA-vs-DIA, or expert-vs-expert comparisons, the best-performing was DIA Ki-67 by QuantCenter, which showed 65% cases within ±0.2xKi-67 of manual counting. CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 measurement by DIA is highly correlated with expert-assessed values. However, close concordance by strict criteria (>80% within ±0.2xKi-67) is not seen with DIA-vs-expert or expert-vs-expert comparisons. The results show analytic noninferiority and support widespread adoption of carefully optimized and validated DIA Ki-67.

The histopathological diagnosis of atypical meningioma: glass slide versus whole slide imaging for grading assessment.

Limited studies on whole slide imaging (WSI) in surgical neuropathology reported a perceived limitation in the recognition of mitoses. This study analyzed and compared the inter- and intra-observer concordance for atypical meningioma, using glass slides and WSI. Two neuropathologists and two residents assessed the histopathological features of 35 meningiomas-originally diagnosed as atypical-in a representative glass slide and corresponding WSI. For each histological parameter and final diagnosis, we calculated the inter- and intra-observer concordance in the two viewing modes and the predictive accuracy on recurrence. The concordance rates for atypical meningioma on glass slides and on WSI were 54% and 60% among four observers and 63% and 74% between two neuropathologists. The inter-observer agreement was higher using WSI than with glass slides for all parameters, with the exception of high mitotic index. For all histological features, we found median intra-observer concordance of ≥ 79% and similar predictive accuracy for recurrence between the two viewing modes. The higher concordance for atypical meningioma using WSI than with glass slides and the similar predictive accuracy for recurrence in the two modalities suggest that atypical meningioma may be safely diagnosed using WSI.

Assessment of associations between clinical and immune microenvironmental factors and tumor mutation burden in resected nonsmall cell lung cancer by applying machine learning to whole-slide images.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether clinical factors and immune microenvironment (IME) factors are associated with tumor mutation burden (TMB) in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed TMB in surgical tumor specimens by performing whole exome sequencing. IME profiles, including PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS), stromal CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density, and stromal Foxp3 TIL density, were quantified by digital pathology using a machine learning algorithm. To detect factors associated with TMB, clinical data, and IME factors were assessed by means of a multiple regression model. RESULTS: We analyzed tumors from 200 of the 246 surgically resected NSCLC patients between September 2014 and September 2015. Patient background: median age (range) 70 years (39-87); male 37.5%; smoker 27.5%; pathological stage (p-stage) I/II/III, 63.5/22.5/14.0%; histological type Ad/Sq, 77.0/23.0%; primary tumor location upper/lower, 58.5/41.5%; median PET SUV 7.5 (0.86-29.8); median serum CEA (sCEA) level 3.4 ng/mL (0.5-144.3); median serum CYFRA 21-1 (sCYFRA) level 1.2 ng/mL (1.0-38.0); median TMB 2.19/ Mb (0.12-64.38); median PD-L1 TPS 15.1% (0.09-77.4); median stromal CD8 TIL density 582.1/mm2 (120.0-4967.6);, and median stromal Foxp3 TIL density 183.7/mm2 (6.3-544.0). The multiple regression analysis identified three factors associated with higher TMB: smoking status: smoker, increase PET SUV, and sCEA level: >5 ng/mL (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IME factors assessed were not associated with TMB, but our findings showed that, in addition to smoking, PET SUV and sCEA levels may be independent predictors of TMB. TMB and IME factors are independent factors in resected NSCLC.

Innovation in Transplantation: The Digital Era.

The international symposium entitled "Innovation in Transplantation: The Digital Era" took place on June 7 and 8, 2018 in Verona, Italy. This meeting was borne out of the productive collaboration between the Universities and Hospital Trusts of Verona and Padua in Italy, in the context of a vast regional project called Research and innovation project within the Health Technology Assessment. The project aimed to create an innovative digital platform for teleconsultation and delivering diagnostic second opinions in the field of organ transplantation within the Veneto region. This conference brought together pathologists, health informatics leaders, clinicians, researchers, vendors, and health-care planners from all around the globe. The symposium was conceived to promote the exchange of knowledge and kindle fertile discussion among the 130 attendees from 15 different countries. This article conveys the highlights of this symposium.

Multisite assessment of NIA-AA guidelines for the neuropathologic evaluation of Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathologic assessment is the current "gold standard" for evaluating the Alzheimer's disease (AD), but there is no consensus on the methods used. METHODS: Fifteen unstained slides (8 brain regions) from each of the 14 cases were prepared and distributed to 10 different National Institute on Aging AD Centers for application of usual staining and evaluation following recently revised guidelines for AD neuropathologic change. RESULTS: Current practice used in the AD Centers Program achieved robustly excellent agreement for the severity score for AD neuropathologic change (average weighted κ = .88, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.95) and good-to-excellent agreement for the three supporting scores. Some improvement was observed with consensus evaluation but not with central staining of slides. Evaluation of glass slides and digitally prepared whole-slide images was comparable. DISCUSSION: AD neuropathologic evaluation as performed across AD Centers yields data that have high agreement with potential modifications for modest improvements.

Whole slide imaging: uses and limitations for surgical pathology and teaching.

Advances in computer and software technology and in the quality of images produced by digital cameras together with development of robotic devices that can take glass histology slides from a cassette holding many slides and place them in a conventional microscope for electronic scanning have facilitated the development of whole slide imaging (WSI) systems during the past decade. Anatomic pathologists now have opportunities to test the utility of WSI systems for diagnostic, teaching and research purposes and to determine their limitations. Uses include rendering primary diagnoses from scanned hematoxylin and eosin stained tissues on slides, reviewing frozen section or routine slides from remote locations for interpretation or consultation. Also, WSI can replace physical storage of glass slides with digital images, storing images of slides from outside institutions, presenting slides at clinical or research conferences, teaching residents and medical students, and storing fluorescence images without fading or quenching of the fluorescence signal. Limitations include the high costs of the scanners, maintenance contracts and IT support, storage of digital files and pathologists' lack of familiarity with the technology. Costs are falling as more devices and systems are sold and cloud storage costs drop. Pathologist familiarity with the technology will grow as more institutions purchase WSI systems. The technology holds great promise for the future of anatomic pathology.

Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images.

The proliferative activity of breast tumors, which is routinely estimated by counting of mitotic figures in hematoxylin and eosin stained histology sections, is considered to be one of the most important prognostic markers. However, mitosis counting is laborious, subjective and may suffer from low inter-observer agreement. With the wider acceptance of whole slide images in pathology labs, automatic image analysis has been proposed as a potential solution for these issues. In this paper, the results from the Assessment of Mitosis Detection Algorithms 2013 (AMIDA13) challenge are described. The challenge was based on a data set consisting of 12 training and 11 testing subjects, with more than one thousand annotated mitotic figures by multiple observers. Short descriptions and results from the evaluation of eleven methods are presented. The top performing method has an error rate that is comparable to the inter-observer agreement among pathologists.

Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization.

BACKGROUND: Digital pathology offers potential improvements in workflow and interpretive accuracy. Although currently digital pathology is commonly used for research and education, its clinical use has been limited to niche applications such as frozen sections and remote second opinion consultations. This is mainly due to regulatory hurdles, but also to a dearth of data supporting a positive economic cost-benefit. Large scale adoption of digital pathology and the integration of digital slides into the routine anatomic/surgical pathology "slide less" clinical workflow will occur only if digital pathology will offer a quantifiable benefit, which could come in the form of more efficient and/or higher quality care. AIM: As a large academic-based health care organization expecting to adopt digital pathology for primary diagnosis upon its regulatory approval, our institution estimated potential operational cost savings offered by the implementation of an enterprise-wide digital pathology system (DPS). METHODS: Projected cost savings were calculated for the first 5 years following implementation of a DPS based on operational data collected from the pathology department. Projected savings were based on two factors: (1) Productivity and lab consolidation savings; and (2) avoided treatment costs due to improvements in the accuracy of cancer diagnoses among nonsubspecialty pathologists. Detailed analyses of incremental treatment costs due to interpretive errors, resulting in either a false positive or false negative diagnosis, was performed for melanoma and breast cancer and extrapolated to 10 other common cancers. RESULTS: When phased in over 5-years, total cost savings based on anticipated improvements in pathology productivity and histology lab consolidation were estimated at $12.4 million for an institution with 219,000 annual accessions. The main contributing factors to these savings were gains in pathologist clinical full-time equivalent capacity impacted by improved pathologist productivity and workload distribution. Expanding the current localized specialty sign-out model to an enterprise-wide shared general/subspecialist sign-out model could potentially reduce costs of incorrect treatment by $5.4 million. These calculations were based on annual over and under treatment costs for breast cancer and melanoma estimated to be approximately $26,000 and $11,000/case, respectively, and extrapolated to $21,500/case for other cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: The projected 5-year total cost savings for our large academic-based health care organization upon fully implementing a DPS was approximately $18 million. If the costs of digital pathology acquisition and implementation do not exceed this value, the return on investment becomes attractive to hospital administrators. Furthermore, improved patient outcome enabled by this technology strengthens the argument supporting adoption of an enterprise-wide DPS.

Reproducibility in the automated quantitative assessment of HER2/neu for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the emerging role of digital imaging in pathology and the application of automated image-based algorithms to a number of quantitative tasks, there is a need to examine factors that may affect the reproducibility of results. These factors include the imaging properties of whole slide imaging (WSI) systems and their effect on the performance of quantitative tools. This manuscript examines inter-scanner and inter-algorithm variability in the assessment of the commonly used HER2/neu tissue-based biomarker for breast cancer with emphasis on the effect of algorithm training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 241 regions of interest from 64 breast cancer tissue glass slides were scanned using three different whole-slide images and were analyzed using two different automated image analysis algorithms, one with preset parameters and another incorporating a procedure for objective parameter optimization. Ground truth from a panel of seven pathologists was available from a previous study. Agreement analysis was used to compare the resulting HER2/neu scores. RESULTS: The results of our study showed that inter-scanner agreement in the assessment of HER2/neu for breast cancer in selected fields of view when analyzed with any of the two algorithms examined in this study was equal or better than the inter-observer agreement previously reported on the same set of data. Results also showed that discrepancies observed between algorithm results on data from different scanners were significantly reduced when the alternative algorithm that incorporated an objective re-training procedure was used, compared to the commercial algorithm with preset parameters. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of objective procedures for algorithm training to account for differences in image properties between WSI systems.