Assessment of C-reactive Protein Level and Efficacy of Diclofenac Sodium and Mefenamic Acid in Relieving Pain in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Surgery.

AIM: To compare the efficacy of diclofenac sodium and mefenamic acid in relieving pain in mandibular impacted third molar surgery and to assess the level of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 90 patients of impacted mandibular third molars. All patients were administered with 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline, and surgical removal of impacted third molar was done following the standardized surgical procedure by a single oral surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups of 45 each. In group I, patients were prescribed 50 mg diclofenac sodium and in group II patients were prescribed 500 mg mefenamic acid for three times a day for 3 days. The CRP level was again evaluated after 3 days of analgesics. Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean VAS was 2.58 in group I and 3.46 in group II, which was statistically considerable (p < 0.05). The mean CRP level postoperatively in group I was 15.7 and after 3 days was 27.2 in group I, whereas it was 25.1 postoperatively and 31.5 after 3 days in group II. CONCLUSION: Authors found that diclofenac sodium as useful as mefenamic acid. The CRP level was raised significantly following surgery, thus reflecting that it is an indicator of inflammation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Diclofenac sodium can be used to relieve pain. The CRP level evaluation can be helpful to assess inflammation following surgery.

Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia.

BACKGROUND: Menorrhagia is a common problem, yet evidence to inform decisions about therapy is limited. In a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial, we compared the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (levonorgestrel-IUS) with usual medical treatment in women with menorrhagia who presented to their primary care providers. METHODS: We randomly assigned 571 women with menorrhagia to treatment with levonorgestrel-IUS or usual medical treatment (tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined estrogen-progestogen, or progesterone alone). The primary outcome was the patient-reported score on the Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale (MMAS) (ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating greater severity), assessed over a 2-year period. Secondary outcomes included general quality-of-life and sexual-activity scores and surgical intervention. RESULTS: MMAS scores improved from baseline to 6 months in both the levonorgestrel-IUS group and the usual-treatment group (mean increase, 32.7 and 21.4 points, respectively; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The improvements were maintained over a 2-year period but were significantly greater in the levonorgestrel-IUS group than in the usual-treatment group (mean between-group difference, 13.4 points; 95% confidence interval, 9.9 to 16.9; P<0.001). Improvements in all MMAS domains (practical difficulties, social life, family life, work and daily routine, psychological well-being, and physical health) were significantly greater in the levonorgestrel-IUS group than in the usual-treatment group, and this was also true for seven of the eight quality-of-life domains. At 2 years, more of the women were still using the levonorgestrel-IUS than were undergoing the usual medical treatment (64% vs. 38%, P<0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of surgical intervention or sexual-activity scores. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In women with menorrhagia who presented to primary care providers, the levonorgestrel-IUS was more effective than usual medical treatment in reducing the effect of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life. (Funded by the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme; ECLIPSE Controlled-Trials.com number, ISRCTN86566246.).

Assessment of acrylic bone cement as a local delivery vehicle for the application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used to reduce the inflammation and pain in patients suffering from arthritis. There is a possible use for these drugs in the treatment of inflammation associated with periodontitis. However, the propensity of NSAIDs to cause serious side effects, including gastrointestinal bleeding, has reduced their usefulness. The local application of NSAIDs can avoid these side effects by delivering low doses of drug directly to the affected site. Three NSAIDs (indomethacin, tolmetin and mefenamic acid) were incorporated into polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (PM MA) strips in a range of concentrations and their cytotoxicity, pattern of drug release and ability to suppress elevated levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in cultured human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPLF) assessed. The strips released between 10 and 30% of the total incorporated drug over 7 days, with the highest levels released by strips containing 20% w/w of drug. Strips containing 20% indomethacin and mefenamic acid released in excess of toxic levels in the first 24 h. Strips containing 20, 10 and 5% w/w NSAID significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the level of PGE2 expression by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenged cells, with only the 20% mefenamic acid strip performing significantly better than the other drugs. We conclude that local delivery of NSAIDs using PMMA as a sustained release vehicle is a possible additional tool in the treatment of periodontitis.

A device for automatic measurement of writhing and its application to the assessment of analgesic agents.

A device was developed for automatically measuring writhing in mice so as to be applied to the assessment of analgesic agents. The device was composed of a specially designed container equipped with a detector, namely, a mechanoelectro transducer for writhing. The detector was made up of units of a string, two plates, and two strain gauges. In the unit, each end of the string was connected to either of the plates to which either of the strain gauges was attached. The change in tension of the string due to writhing was converted into the mechanical strain of the plates and then the resistance change of the strain gauges. The resistance change was amplified by a Wheatstone bridge circuit that was connected to a differential amplifier, a high-pass filter, comparator(s), and a monostable multivibrator to obtain the electrical signal for writhing. Using this device, writhing was continuously measured, and evaluation of various types of analgesic agents was performed. The result suggests that this device has sufficient accuracy both for the detection of writhing and the evaluation of analgesics. It has the advantage of automatic measurement of writhing in contrast to the conventional visual observation method.

Mild analgesics and the accident and emergency department--cost and safety more important than potency?

A prospective controlled trial involving over 1000 patients did not reveal any difference between four drugs commonly used in accident and emergency departments for the relief of mild to moderate pain. There were no significant variations in therapeutic effect, side-effects or patient compliance. When considering the supply of analgesics which may be no more potent than those available without prescription from retail chemists, cost and safety are more important than analgesic effect. By restricting the choice of analgesics available, the accident and emergency department should be able to increase awareness among its staff of the actions and side-effects of a small number of prescribed drugs and to contain costs.