Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment for Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients in Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effective pharmacological treatment in adult kidney transplant recipients from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS: A decision tree model for the induction phase and a Markov model for the maintenance phase were built. A review of the clinical literature was conducted to extract probabilities, and the life-years were used as the outcome. Costs were calculated using the administrative databases. The evaluating treatment schemes are organized by groups of evidence with direct comparisons. RESULTS: In the induction phase, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin+ methylprednisolone is dominant, more effective, and less expensive, compared with basiliximab+methylprednisolone. In the maintenance phase, azathioprine (AZA) is dominant in contrast to mycophenolate mofetil (MFM) both with cyclosporine (CIC)+ corticosteroids (CE); CIC is dominant relative to sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) (both with MFM+CE or AZA+CE), and TAC is dominant compared with SIR (in addition with MFM+CE or mycophenolate sodium [MFS]+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to MFS and everolimus, and SIR is more effective MFM but it does not exceed the threshold (in sum with TAC+CE); MFS and MFM are dominant relative to everolimus, and SIR is more effective than MFM, but it does not exceed the threshold (in addiction with CIC+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to TAC (in sum with SIR+CE), and CIC+AZA+CE is dominant in relation to TAC+MFM+CE. CONCLUSIONS: The base-case results for all evidence groups are consistent with the different sensitivity analyses.

Epidemiology, clinical features and management of autoimmune hepatitis in Switzerland: a retrospective and prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Swiss Autoimmune Hepatitis Cohort Study is a nationwide registry, initiated in 2017, that collects retrospective and prospective clinical data and biological samples from patients of all ages with autoimmune hepatitis treated at Swiss hepatology centres. Here, we report the analysis of the first 5 years of registry data. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients with autoimmune hepatitis have been enrolled, 30 of whom were diagnosed before 18 years of age and composed the paediatric cohort. Paediatric cohort: median age at diagnosis 12.5 years (range 1-17, interquartile range (IQR) 8-15), 16 (53%) girls, 6 (32%) with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, 8 (27%) with autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis, 1 with primary biliary cholangitis variant syndrome, 4 (15%) with inflammatory bowel disease and 10 (41%) with advanced liver fibrosis at diagnosis. Adult cohort: median age at diagnosis 54 years (range 42-64, IQR 18-81), 185 (71%) women, 51 (20%) with primary biliary cholangitis variant syndrome, 22 (8%) with primary sclerosing cholangitis variant syndrome, 9 (4%) with inflammatory bowel disease and 66 (32%) with advanced liver fibrosis at diagnosis. The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 5.2 years (IQR 3-9.3 years). Treatment in children: 29 (97%) children were initially treated with corticosteroids, 28 of whom received combination treatment with azathioprine. Budesonide was used in four children, all in combination with azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil was used in five children, all of whom had previously received corticosteroids and thiopurine. Treatment in adults (data available for 228 patients): 219 (96%) were treated with corticosteroids, mostly in combination with azathioprine. Predniso(lo)ne was the corticosteroid used in three-quarters of patients; the other patients received budesonide. A total of 78 (33%) patients received mycophenolate mofetil, 62 of whom had previously been treated with azathioprine. Complete biochemical response was achieved in 13 of 19 (68%) children and 137 of 182 (75%) adults with available follow-up data. All children were alive at the last follow-up, and none had undergone liver transplantation. Five (2%) adults underwent liver transplantation, two of whom had a fulminant presentation. Four (2%) adults with autoimmune hepatitis died (two from liver-associated causes). CONCLUSION: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis in Switzerland had clinical features similar to those in other cohorts. The proportion of patients diagnosed with primary biliary cholangitis variant syndrome was higher than expected. Autoimmune hepatitis was managed according to guidelines, except for the use of budesonide in a small proportion of paediatric patients. The outcomes were excellent, but the findings must be confirmed over a longer follow-up period.

Cost-Effectiveness of Tacrolimus Compared With Cyclosporine for Immunosuppression Therapy in Patients Who Underwent Heart Transplant in Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatment in maintenance therapy for adult heart transplant recipients from the Colombian health system perspective. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree model with a 1-year time horizon. A review of the clinical literature was performed to extract probabilities of health events and acute rejections avoided were used as the health outcome. Costs were calculated from the base-case approximation and were obtained from administrative databases in Colombia (Sistema de Información de Precios de Medicamentos 2020 and Suficiencia 2012-2019), and the prices were adjusted to US dollar 2021. RESULTS: Two evaluation results were presented. The first evaluates the tacrolimus + azathioprine + corticosteroid (TAC) scheme compared with cyclosporine + azathioprine + corticosteroid (CAC), in which the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicates that 1 additional rejection avoided has a cost of US dollar $5461.09 which, compared with the cost-effectiveness threshold in the base case, indicates that the TAC scheme is not a cost-effective (CE) strategy with respect to the CAC scheme. The second result shows the comparison of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (TMC) with cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid (CMC) in which TMC was found to be a dominant alternative to CMC. CONCLUSIONS: The tacrolimus-based immunosuppression scheme is not CE in its TAC scheme, versus CAC, and is dominant in its TMC scheme, versus CMC, sensitivity analyses show that tacrolimus could become a CE alternative in any scheme used against higher cost-effectiveness threshold.

Real-world treatment utilization and economic implications of lupus nephritis disease activity in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with approximately 40% of patients with SLE developing LN. Even with treatment, 10%-30% of patients will progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although many studies have assessed the clinical value of low disease activity in LN, the economic implications are less defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment utilization and health care costs associated with active disease, low disease activity, and ESRD in patients with LN. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Optum pharmacy and medical claims data from 2015 to 2019 was performed and included patients with a diagnosis of SLE (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision codes 710.0 or M32, respectively) and additional prespecified criteria for LN. Total health care payer costs for medical and pharmacy services and treatment utilization for commonly prescribed medications were determined for periods of low disease activity, active disease, or ESRD. RESULTS: A total of 21,251 patients (mean age 60.3 years; 87% female; 55% White patients and 18% Black patients) with a mean follow-up period of 30.6 months were included; the majority of patients had active disease (67.3%), followed by low disease activity (51.3%), and ESRD (10.5%). Glucocorticoids were used 2 times more often and mycophenolate mofetil was used 4 times more often in patients with active disease vs low disease activity. Glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus were more commonly used in patients with ESRD vs those with low disease activity. Mean medical costs were $4,777 per month in active disease and $18,084 per month in ESRD vs $2,523 per month in low disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment burden and costs are high for patients with active disease and ESRD in LN. Treatments that allow patients to achieve and maintain low disease activity may help improve patient outcomes and reduce medication use and overall health care costs. DISCLOSURES: Maria Dall'Era and Kenneth Kalunian are consultants of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Eric Turowski, Vanessa Birardi, Neil Solomons, Simrat Randhawa, and Paola Mina-Osorio are employees and stockholders of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Michael Eaddy is a former employee of Xcenda, LLC. Augustina Ogbonnaya and Eileen Farrelly are employees of Xcenda, LLC, which was contracted by Aurinia Pharmaceuticals to assist in the conduct of this study and the writing of this manuscript. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals provided funding for this study and the preparation of the manuscript. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals had a role in writing the report and decision to submit for publication.

Cost-Utility of Immunosuppressive Therapy Post-Renal Transplantation in Saudi Arabia: The Saudi Ministry of Health Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease is ranked fourth among the top 10 causes of death in Saudi Arabia. Renal transplantation has been recognized as the treatment of choice compared with long-term dialysis to maintain graft survival and prolong a patient's healthy living. Immunosuppressants (ISs) must be administered lifelong. The choice between IS therapies can be challenging because of the similarity in efficacy with some differences in adverse events profile. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of different IS regimens in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A 25-year Markov model was developed based on a previously published study from the Saudi Ministry of Health payer perspective. Efficacy parameters were driven from the literature, whereas cost data were estimated from the Ministry of Health database. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to test the base-case model results' robustness. RESULTS: All comparators resulted in 6.2 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) except for Advagraf® treatment (5.5 QALYs). Generic tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) will cost 70 701.45 US dollars ($) (Saudi riyal 265 130.44) per patient to gain 6.2 QALYs over 25 years' time horizon. In the improved adherence scenario, Envarsus® plus generic MMF generated 9.6 QALYs with a cost of $59 849 per patient. Monte Carlo simulation results have shown that generic tacrolimus is still the cheapest treatment option compared with other treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis suggested that all IS options are not cost-effective strategies relative to the willingness-to-pay threshold of $20 000. Nevertheless, Envarsus plus generic MMF regimen could become the most cost-effective regimen at different willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Rituximab vs Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Importance: There is an increasing body of literature that supports the use of rituximab as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in pemphigus vulgaris. However, the cost of rituximab is substantial compared with conventional agents, and there are limited health economic data to justify its use. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars relative to mycophenolate mofetil as a first-line steroid-sparing agent for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cost-utility analysis over a 24-month time horizon was conducted from the perspective of the Australian health care sector using a modeled cohort of treatment-naive adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate disease progression following first-line treatment with rituximab biosimilars or mycophenolate mofetil. The simulated cohort transitioned between controlled disease, uncontrolled disease, and death. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from available published literature. Cost data were primarily obtained from published government data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Primary outcomes were the changes in cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over the 24 months. Interventions: Rituximab biosimilars and mycophenolate mofetil. Results: The simulated cohort of treatment-naive patients had a mean age of 50.8 years, a female-to-male ratio of 1.24, and moderate to severe disease as classified by the Harman criteria. First-line rituximab biosimilars were associated with a cost reduction of AU$639 and an improvement of 0.07 QALYs compared with mycophenolate mofetil, resulting in an ICER of -AU$8818/QALY. Rituximab biosimilars were therefore more effective and less costly compared with mycophenolate mofetil. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that rituximab biosimilars remained cost-effective across a range of values for cost, utility, and transition probability input parameters and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cost-utility analysis, rituximab biosimilars were cost-effective compared with mycophenolate mofetil for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Further investigation into its cost-effectiveness over a longer time horizon is necessary, but the favorable results of this study suggest that the high acquisition costs of rituximab biosimilars may be offset by its effectiveness and provide economic evidence in support of its listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for pemphigus vulgaris.

Trends in actual medication use for child-onset systemic lupus erythematosus using the Japanese health insurance database 2009-18.

OBJECTIVES: Immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay of treatment for child-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). Since epidemiological data on Japanese cSLE patients are not available, we evaluated the trends in how treatment choices have changed over time in Japan. METHODS: Using the Japanese health insurance database provided by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd, we identified cSLE patients and evaluated changes in the use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications and maximum daily doses of prednisolone from 2009 to 2018. RESULTS: Of 182 cSLE patients, 86% were female, and the median age was 14 years. Oral prednisolone was used in more than 97% of cSLE patients during the study period, and the median of the maximum daily dose in each patient decreased over time. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was used less frequently after 2016, while mycophenolate mofetil and hydroxychloroquine were used frequently after 2016. The use of mizoribine reduced after 2014, whereas the other immunosuppressive medications showed no significant change over time; the use of biological agents was very limited. CONCLUSIONS: Oral prednisolone was the mainstay of treatment for cSLE, and the maximum daily dose has reduced over the past decade. The most frequently prescribed immunosuppressive therapy has shifted to mycophenolate mofetil over time.

Utilization of Mycophenolic Acid, Azathioprine, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporin, Sirolimus, and Everolimus: Multinational Study.

Background: Organ transplantations are difficult, complicated and very expensive interventions. In order to preserve the transplanted organs, it is necessary to provide medical care to the patients in terms of immunosuppression. According to the guidelines, the first-line therapy choices for achieving immunosuppression after transplantation are tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid, azathioprine, sirolimus, everolimus" and corticosteroids. The aim of our study was to examine the utilization of this drugs in Montenegro and to compare the results with the ones from Finland, Croatia, and Serbia. Methods: In our investigation we used Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) methodology. Prices per DDD of drugs are presented in euros (€). Results: In all observed countries, there is a positive trend in the consumption of all 6 drugs during the analyzed period. The prices per DDD of these drugs generally show a negative trend. Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in Montenegro recorded the largest reduction in the price per DDD. Price per one DDD of tacrolimus decreased from €13.28 in 2009 to €5.11 in 2019, thus by about 260%, and as regards mycophenolic acid, the price per one DDD decreased from €9.59 in 2009 to € 3.36 in 2019, thus by almost 300%. Conclusion: Despite the reduction in the price per DDD, drugs that are used as immunosuppressants are showing increasing costs from year to year. Since these drugs are expensive, they participate in a significant percentage in the budget for medicines in each country.

Better Understanding the Disparity Associated With Black Race in Heart Transplant Outcomes: A National Registry Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Black heart transplant recipients have higher risk of mortality than White recipients. Better understanding of this disparity, including subgroups most affected and timing of the highest risk, is necessary to improve care of Black recipients. We hypothesize that this disparity may be most pronounced among young recipients, as barriers to care like socioeconomic factors may be particularly salient in a younger population and lead to higher early risk of mortality. METHODS: We studied 22 997 adult heart transplant recipients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from January 2005 to 2017 using Cox regression models adjusted for recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics. RESULTS: Among recipients aged 18 to 30 years, Black recipients had 2.05-fold (95% CI, 1.67-2.51) higher risk of mortality compared with non-Black recipients (P<0.001, interaction P<0.001); however, the risk was significant only in the first year post-transplant (first year: adjusted hazard ratio, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.60-3.31], P<0.001; after first year: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.54-1.29]; P=0.4). This association was attenuated among recipients aged 31 to 40 and 41 to 60 years, in whom Black recipients had 1.53-fold ([95% CI, 1.25-1.89] P<0.001) and 1.20-fold ([95% CI, 1.09-1.33] P<0.001) higher risk of mortality. Among recipients aged 61 to 80 years, no significant association was seen with Black race (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.97-1.29]; P=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Young Black recipients have a high risk of mortality in the first year after heart transplant, which has been masked in decades of research looking at disparities in aggregate. To reduce overall racial disparities, clinical research moving forward should focus on targeted interventions for young Black recipients during this period.

Dupilumab en dermatitis atópica no controlada con terapia tópica / Dupilumab in atopic dermatitis not controlled with topical therapy

CONTEXTO: La dermatitis atópica (DA) es una enfermedad cutánea inflamatoria pruriginosa crónica comúnmente asociada a un nivel sérico elevado de inmunoglobulina E (IgE) y antecedentes personales o familiares de atopia. La misma describe un grupo de trastornos que incluyen eczema, asma y rinitis alérgica. La sensibilización a alérgenos del medio ambiente o de los alimentos también están asociados con el fenotipo de la dermatitis atópica pero no parecen ser un factor causante, sin embargo, podrían contribuir en un subgrupo de pacientes con enfermedad grave. La DA se observa con mayor frecuencia en niños, con ligera preponderancia al sexo femenino, pero también afecta a adultos. A nivel mundial se estima que la prevalencia de DA en niños, realizada por Estudio Internacional de Asma y Alergias en la Infancia (ISAAC, su sigla del inglés International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood) en 2009, oscila entre el 0,9 al 22,5%.2 Mientras que existen limitados datos sobre la prevalencia en adultos, ya que en la mayoría de los casos se basan em información de cuestionarios autoadministrados, que estiman que la misma ronda del 2 al 5 %.1,3 Em Argentina algunos centros de salud de las provincias de Córdoba, Rosario, Salta y Neuquén estimaron una prevalencia del 6,4% en la población de 6 a 7 años (0,9% para las DA graves) y del 7,2% en la población de 13 a 14 años (1,2% para las DA graves). TECNOLOGÍA: Dupilumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal IgG4 humanizado que inhibe las respuestas inducidas por las citocinas interleucina-4 e interleucina-13, incluida la liberación de citocinas proinflamatorias, quimiocinas e IgE. OBJETIVO: Dupilumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal IgG4 humanizado que inhibe las respuestas inducidas por las citocinas interleucina-4 e interleucina-13, incluida la liberación de citocinas proinflamatorias, quimiocinas e IgE. MÉTODOS: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados a las políticas de cobertura del uso de dupilumab en dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa no controlada con terapia tópicas. RESULTADOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas, en buscadores genéricos de internet, y financiadores de salud. Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS), evaluaciones económicas, guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y políticas de cobertura de diferentes sistemas de salud. CONCLUSIONES: No se identificaron estudios que comparen directamente dupilumab frente a otras opciones terapéuticas sistémicas (ciclosporina A, metotrexato, azatioprina y micofenolato mofetilo) em dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa no controlada con terapias tópicas, como primera línea de tratamiento sistémico. Evidencia de baja calidad, proveniente de una comparación indirecta, sugiere que dupilumab mejoraría desenlaces relacionados con la calidad de vida frente a azatioprina, mientras no habría diferencias para la calidad de vida y prurito frente a ciclosporina A y metotrexato, en adultos con dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa no controlados con terapias tópicas, como primera o segunda opción de tratamiento sistémico. Evidencia de alta calidad muestra que dupilumab combinado con corticosteroides tópicos em pacientes adultos con dermatitis atópica severa que no responden a terapias tópicas y no controlados, intolerantes o con contraindicación a ciclosporina A (segunda opción de tratamento sistémico), mejora de manera clínicamente relevante las puntaciones de las escalas de respuesta clínica y de calidad de vida a los cuatro meses de seguimiento, comparado a placebo. Evidencia de baja calidad proveniente de una comparación indirecta mencionada anteriormente em pacientes adultos con dermatitis atópica severa que no responden a terapias tópicas como primera o segunda opción de tratamiento sistémico, sugiere que dupilumab mejoraría desenlaces relacionados con la calidad de vida y prurito frente azatioprina, mientras no habría diferencias para la calidad de vida y prurito frente a ciclosporina A y metotrexato. Evidencia de baja calidad sugiere que dupilumab combinado con corticosteroides tópicos en pacientes adultos con dermatitis atópica severa que no responden a terapias tópicas y no controlados, intolerantes o con contraindicación a ciclosporina A y a otras terapias sistémicas disponibles, mejoría de manera clínicamente relevante las puntaciones de las escalas de respuesta clínica y de calidad de vida a los cuatro meses de seguimiento comparado a otras terapias sistémicas disponibles. Una guía de práctica clínica y dos consensos de expertos de Latinoamérica contempla el uso de dupilumab en dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa, al igual que otras alternativas, en quienes el tratamiento tópico no es suficiente y donde otros tratamientos sistémicos no han respondido o no son adecuados. Un consenso de expertos de Europa lo incluye en dermatitis atópica severa no controlados con terapias tópicas, mientras que otros dos consensos de Canadá y Australasia lo mencionan como una opción en enfermedad de moderada a severa. Ningúno de los países de Latinoamérica relevados da cobertura a la tecnología en la indicación evaluada, mientras que, dentro de los países de altos ingresos relevados, cinco dan cobertura y uno no la menciona. En tres estudios de costo-efectividad proveniente de países de altos ingresos que comparan dupilumab contra cuidado estándar en adultos con dermatitis atópica de moderada a severa no controlados con terapias tópicas, resultó no costo-efectivo para los umbrales establecidos por esos países. Se considera una tecnología de alto costo.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 11 de agosto de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on August 11, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referentes ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 14 artigos e 5 protocolos.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 7 de julho de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on July 7, 2020

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referente ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 17 artigos.

Cost effectiveness of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Thailand: Economic evaluation and budget impact analysis.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory condition of the central nervous system. The extent of disability depends on the severity of the disease and the number of relapses. Although azathioprine is currently the main treatment for patients with NMOSD in Thailand, patients often relapse during its use. Hence, it is argued that there are other drugs that would be more effective. The purpose of this study is to evaluate, from a societal perspective and from the economic impact on Thailand's healthcare system, the cost utility of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab in patients resistant to azathioprine. The Markov model with a one-year cycle length was applied to predict the health and cost outcomes in patients with NMOSD over a lifetime. The results showed that rituximab exhibited the highest quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains among all the options. Among the rituximab-based treatments, the administration of a rituximab biosimilar with CD27+ memory B cell monitoring proved to be the most cost-effective option. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of 160,000 Thai baht (THB), or 5,289 US dollar (USD), per QALY gained, the treatment exhibited the highest probability of being cost effective (48%). A sensitivity analysis based on the adjusted price of a generic MMF determined that the treatment was cost effective, exhibiting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -164,653 THB (-5,443 USD) and a 32% probability of being cost effective. The calculated budget impact of treating patients resistant to conventional therapy was 1-6 million THB (33,000-198,000 USD) for the first three years, while after the third year, the budget impact stabilized at 3-4 million THB (99,000-132,000 USD). These data indicate that, in Thailand, treatment of drug resistant NMOSD with a rituximab biosimilar with CD27+ memory B cell monitoring or treatment with a generic MMF would be cost effective and would result in a low budget impact. Therefore, the inclusion of both the rituximab biosimilar and a generic MMF in the National Drug List of Essential Medicine for the treatment of NMOSD may be appropriate.

The Prevalence and Causes of Non-adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications in Patients with Lupus Nephritis Flares.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis is one of the major manifestations of SLE. Poor adherence to medications is an important cause of not achieving treatment targets. METHODS: We assessed patients' adherence to immune-suppressive medications in patients with Lupus nephritis using the Morisky, Green, and Levine (MGL) Adherence Scale. The aim was to study the effect of non-adherence on the occurrence of renal flares. RESULTS: We recruited 104 patients with lupus nephritis. Sixty-six patients had flares of LN. There was a high prevalence of non-adherence to medications (n=68). Patients who were non-adherent to treatment had more renal flares (p= 0.02). Duration of lupus since diagnosis was significantly higher in patients who had renal flares. Using regression analysis, non-adherence to medications was associated with 3.7 higher risk of developing a single renal flare and 4.9 higher risk of developing more than one renal flare. Causes of non-adherence were medications side effects in 43% of patients, financial issues in 31% or forgetfulness in 26%. CONCLUSION: Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications has a high prevalence in patients with lupus nephritis and is correlated with the number of renal flares.

Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus for the treatment of moderate-to-severe lupus nephritis in China.

Aim: Therapy for lupus nephritis (LN) requires treatment with immunosuppressive regimens, often including intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine. Additionally, tacrolimus (original form or generic) is recommended to treat LN patients in Asia, including China. However, the cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus therapy has not previously been assessed. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus in the treatment of moderate-to-severe LN versus standard therapies in China. Materials & methods: This cost-effectiveness model combined a decision-tree/Markov-model structure to map transitions between health states during induction and maintenance treatment phases. Induction with tacrolimus, IVCY or MMF, was followed by tacrolimus, MMF or azathioprine maintenance. Results: According to the model, during induction, complete remission rates were higher with tacrolimus versus IVCY (relative risk 1.40 vs IVCY [deterministic sensitivity analysis minimum 0.92, maximum 2.13]) and time to response was shorter. Relapse rates were lower with tacrolimus versus azathioprine or MMF during maintenance. Tacrolimus induction and maintenance was the most cost-effective regimen, incurring the lowest total costs (CN¥180,448) with the highest quality-adjusted life-years. Conclusion: The model demonstrated that tacrolimus use in both induction and maintenance therapy may be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment for LN in China.

Update on the clinical assessment and management of thyroid eye disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To offer an update on advances and controversies in the assessment, investigation and treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED), a disfiguring orbital autoimmune disease, which can manifest with diplopia and threaten not only sight - but also life. RECENT FINDINGS: Developments in biomarkers and imaging are helping to tailor the management of patients. Emerging therapies target different pathways in the disease and are informed by studies into TED pathogenesis: the last 2 years has, for example, seen the culmination of a two-decade long bench-to-bedside story in which an original focus on the IGF1 receptor has translated into an effective treatment for proptosis in thyroid eye disease. Whether this will result in a real-world reduction in TED-related morbidity will depend on access; commercial pricing decisions may preclude widespread adoption of novel therapies. SUMMARY: Thyroid eye disease research is enjoying a renaissance with advances in both monitoring and treatment coupled with a renewed emphasis on a holisitic approach, which includes aesthetic care for patients; this is perhaps the most exciting time to be part of the international thyroid eye disease community in decades - for physicians, surgeons and patients. The commercial window for break-through drugs are narrowing with an array of new therapeutic agents in the pipeline over the coming decade.

Impact of induction immunosuppression on patient survival in heart transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in the current allocation era.

BACKGROUND: The practice of induction therapy with either rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) or interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA) is common among heart transplant recipients. However, its benefits in the setting of contemporary maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus/mycophenolic acid (TAC/MPA) are unknown. METHODS: We compared post-transplant mortality among three induction therapy strategies (r-ATG vs IL2-RA vs no induction) in a retrospective cohort analysis of heart transplant recipients maintained on TAC/MPA in the Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) database between the years 2006 and 2015. We used a multivariable model adjusting for clinically important co-morbidities, and a propensity score analysis using the inverse probability weighted (IPW) method in the final analysis. RESULTS: In multivariable IPW analysis, r-ATG (HR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.05-1.46, P = 0.01) remained significantly associated with a higher mortality. There was a trend toward having a higher mortality in the IL2-RA (HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.00-1.24, P = 0.06) group. Subgroup analyses failed to show a patient survival benefit in using either r-ATG or IL2-RA among any of the subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSION: In this contemporary cohort of heart transplant recipients receiving TAC/MPA, neither r-ATG nor IL2-RA were associated with a survival benefit. On the contrary, adjusted analyses showed a significantly higher mortality in the r-ATG group and a trend toward higher mortality in the IL2-RA group. While caution is needed in interpreting treatment effects in an observational cohort, these data call into question the benefit of induction therapy as a common practice and highlight the need for more studies.

Azathioprine and Mycophenolate Mofetil Adherence Patterns and Predictors Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are immunosuppressants frequently used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We studied longitudinal patterns and predictors of adherence to AZA and MMF in a nationwide US SLE cohort. METHODS: In the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (2000-2010) database, we identified patients with SLE who initiated AZA or MMF (no use in the prior 6 months) with ≥12 months of continuous follow-up. We dichotomized adherence at 80%, with ≥24 of 30 days per month considered adherent. We used group-based trajectory models to estimate monthly adherence patterns and multivariable multinomial logistic regression to determine the association between demographic, SLE and utilization-related predictors, and the odds ratios (OR) of belonging to a nonadherent versus the adherent trajectory, separately for AZA and MMF. RESULTS: We identified 2,309 AZA initiators and 2,070 MMF initiators with SLE. Four-group trajectory models classified 17% of AZA and 21% of MMF initiators as adherent. AZA and MMF nonadherers followed similar trajectory patterns. African American race (OR 1.67 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20-2.31]) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.58 [95% CI 1.06-2.35]) increased odds of AZA nonadherence; there were no significant associations between race/ethnicity and MMF nonadherence. Male sex and polypharmacy were associated with lower odds of nonadherence to both medications; lupus nephritis was associated with lower odds of nonadherence to MMF (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.55-0.99]). CONCLUSION: Adherence to AZA or MMF over the first year of use was rare. Race, sex, and lupus nephritis were modestly associated with adherence, but the magnitude, direction, and significance of predictors differed by medication, suggesting the complexity of predicting adherence behavior.