Recent Updates in Hypertriglyceridemia Management for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mounting evidence continues to support the causal role of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Substantial residual ASCVD risk remains among high-risk patients who have elevated triglycerides despite reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statin therapy. Ongoing research efforts have focused on evaluating triglyceride-lowering therapies among patients with hypertriglyceridemia. RECENT FINDINGS: The REDUCE-IT trial showed that the addition of icosapent ethyl, a highly purified form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), can reduce vascular events among statin-treated individuals with elevated triglycerides who have either clinical ASCVD or diabetes plus another risk factor. Although additional evidence for EPA has emerged from other trials, conflicting results have been reported by subsequent trials that tested different omega-3 fatty acid formulations. Randomized clinical trials have not demonstrated incremental ASCVD benefit of fibrates on background of statin therapy, but fibrates are used to help prevent pancreatitis in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. Selective inhibitors of apolipoprotein C-III (apoC3) and angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3), proteins that are involved in metabolism of TRLs by regulating lipoprotein lipase, have been tested in selected patient populations and showed significant reduction in triglyceride and LDL-C levels. Statin therapy continues to be the cornerstone of pharmacologic reduction of cardiovascular risk. High-dose EPA in the form of icosapent ethyl has been demonstrated to have cardiovascular benefit on top of statins in persons with elevated triglycerides at high ASCVD risk. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating novel selective therapies such as apoC3 and ANGPTL3 inhibitors.

Physician variation in the de-adoption of ineffective statin and fibrate therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' variation in de-adopting concurrent statin and fibrate therapy for type 2 diabetic patients following a reversal in clinical evidence. DATA SOURCES: We analyzed 2007-2015 claims data from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, real-world data asset with de-identified administrative claims and electronic health record data. STUDY DESIGN: We modeled fibrate use among Medicare Advantage and commercially insured type 2 diabetic statin users before and after the publication of the ACCORD lipid trial, which found statins and fibrates were no more effective than statins alone in reducing cardiovascular events among type 2 diabetic patients. We modeled fibrate use trends with physician random effects and physician characteristics such as age and specialty. DATA EXTRACTION: We identified patient-year-quarters with one year of continuous insurance enrollment, type 2 diabetes diagnoses, and fibrate use. We designated the physician most responsible for patients' diabetes care based on evaluation and management visits and prescriptions of glucose-lowering drugs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Fibrate use increased by 0.12 percentage points per quarter among commercial patients (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.14) and 0.17 percentage points per quarter among Medicare Advantage patients (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.20) before the trial and then decreased by 0.16 percentage points per quarter among commercial patients (95% CI, -0.18 to -0.15) and 0.05 percentage points per quarter among Medicare Advantage patients (95% CI, -0.06 to -0.03) after the trial. However, 45% of physicians treating commercial patients and 48% of physicians treating Medicare Advantage patients had positive trends in prescribing following the trial. Physicians' characteristics did not explain their variation (pseudo R2  = 0.000). CONCLUSION: On average, physicians decreased fibrate prescribing following the ACCORD lipid trial. However, many physicians increased prescribing following the trial. Observable physician characteristics did not explain variations in prescribing. Future research should examine whether physicians vary similarly in other de-adoption settings.

Cumulative non-HDL-cholesterol burden in patients with hypertriglyceridemia receiving long-term fibrate therapy: Real life data from a lipid clinic cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Though epidemiological data suggest that an elevated triglyceride (TG) level may be a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), there is still insufficient clinical evidence. This study was designed to evaluate the real-life efficacy and side effects of fibrate treatment for hypertriglyceridemia seen in a lipid clinic, as well as cardiovascular and diabetic outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients who were followed-up for a diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia at the lipid outpatient clinic of the Ege University Cardiology Department between 1997 and 2018. Data of demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from hospital records. All patients (n=240) with at least 1 year of follow-up were included in the analysis. During follow-up, patients were treated with fenofibrate, and less frequently, gemfibrozile (14 patients), at different doses according to the TG level and disease severity. RESULTS: Of the study population, 23% had CAD, 21% were diabetic, and 52% were obese. On admission, 20% were using fibrates and 17% were on statins. The mean admission lipid levels were TG: 281±194 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 115±37 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol: 43±13 mg/dL, and non-HDL cholesterol: 166±42 mg/dL. The mean length of follow-up was 5.3±4.7 years (range: 1-16 years). A total of 8 (4.3%) patients had adverse effects during follow-up (1 on statin combination and 7 on fibrates alone). The side effects observed were an elevation of liver enzymes in 3, myalgia in 2, insomnia in 1, malaise in 1, and a skin rash in 1 patient. No rhabdomyolysis or myopathy was seen. During follow-up, diabetes developed in 14 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in 14 patients. The cumulative non-HDL cholesterol level was significantly high in patients who developed diabetes or CVD. Receiver operating curve analysis indicated that a cumulative non-HDL cholesterol value of 1016 mg/dL was predictive of the development of diabetes mellitus or CVD with 85% sensitivity and 70% specificity. CONCLUSION: In real life, long-term fibrate use is effective and safe. The cumulative non-HDL cholesterol burden can be used to assess the efficacy of treatment as a simple and easily calculated method. Large studies are needed to further clarify the value of this parameter in predicting the development of both diabetes and CVD.

Effect of Combination Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy and Triglyceride-Lowering Therapy on Medical Costs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

High triglyceride (TG) levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with higher medical costs. We analyzed the economic impact of TG-lowering therapies and whether the association between medical costs and therapy differed according to TG reduction. We conducted an observational cohort study of 184,932 patients with diabetes mellitus who had a TG measurement between January 2012 and June 2013 and a second TG measurement 3 to 15 months later. We identified 4 therapy groups (statin monotherapy, TG-specific monotherapy, statin/TG-specific combination therapy, or no therapy) and stratified those groups by percent change in TG (increased ≥5%, change of ≤4.9%, decreased 5% to 29%, decreased ≥30%). We compared change in medical costs between the year before and after therapy, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 184,932 total patients, 143,549 (77.6%) received statin monotherapy, 900 (0.5%) received TG-specific monotherapy, 1,956 (1.1%) received statin and TG-specific combination therapy, and 38,527 (20.8%) received no prescription lipid agents. After covariate adjustment, statin/TG-specific agent recipients had a mean 1-year total cost reduction of $1,110. The greatest cost reduction was seen among statin/TG-specific combination therapy patients who reduced TG levels by ≥30% (-$2,859). Statin monotherapy patients who reduced TG by ≥30% also had a large reduction in adjusted costs (-$1,079). In conclusion, we found a substantial economic benefit to treating diabetic patients with statin/TG-specific combination lipid therapy compared with monotherapy of either type or no lipid pharmacotherapy. A TG reduction of ≥30% produced a particularly large reduction in 1-year medical costs.

Comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: use of propensity-score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias.

PURPOSE: Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in reducing risk of cardiovascular disease in real-world settings is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed using a large managed care claims database of patients identified with type 2 diabetes based on diagnosis codes from January 2002 through December 2003 and continuously enrolled for the entire study period, 5.5 years. A statin plus fibrate combination therapy group (patients who used statins less than 6 months and augmented with fibrates for more than 6 months) and a statin monotherapy group (patients who used statins persistently) among patients with type 2 diabetes were followed for 3 years to examine the relationship between the intervention and cardiovascular events using a multivariable logistic regression model, propensity score method, and instrumental variable approach. RESULTS: The statin plus fibrate combination therapy group of 318 and the statin monotherapy group of 9928 were identified from 75,515 diabetics. After adjusting for factors that can impact cardiovascular outcomes, the combination therapy group did not significantly experience a reduction in cardiovascular disease, as compared with the statin monotherapy group (OR = 0.77; p = 0.083). The statin plus fibrate combination therapy group was significantly associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events after propensity matching (OR = 0.53; p = 0.002). Using the physician prescribing preference instrument to adjust for unmeasured confounding, we did not find evidence that subjects in the statin plus fibrate combination therapy group versus stain monotherapy group experienced a significant reduction in cardiovascular events (p = 0.124). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a difference in effectiveness regarding cardiovascular outcomes between the statin plus fibrate combination therapy and the statin monotherapy after controlling for hidden bias.

Assessment of the use of hypolipidemic agents (HAs), mainly statins, in elderly subjects aged 80 years and more in Burgundy: analysis of 13,211 patients.

Only few studies have investigated the use of HA in elderly subjects and there are no data in very elderly subjects. We assessed the prescription of HA and analyzed the relationship between such prescriptions and frailty markers among persons aged 80 and more in an observational study. We recorded the prescriptions for 13,211 patients aged 80-109 years and affiliated to the "Mutualité-Sociale-Agricole (MSA)" of Burgundy over a 1-month period. The prescription of a HA among all included patients, and the existence of serious long-term disease(s) (LTD), polypharmacy or a prescription of cardiovascular drugs among patients receiving a HA were recorder. Among the 13,211 patients, 3412 aged 80-98 years were treated with an HA. The main HA were statins (70.4%), and fibrates were used in 27.3% of cases. Of these 3412 patients, 2250 had one or several LTD mainly coronaropathy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or peripheral artery disease. The mean number of drugs per prescription was 6.37. Among subjects treated with HA, 40% also received antiplatelets, 35.6% ß-blockers and 30% inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. For 99% of the patients, the prescription of HA was a renewal. Prescribers were mainly general practitioners (96.8%). Statins are the most widely prescribed HA even among very elderly subjects. However, after 80 years the prescription of HA, mainly statins, decreases with aging. This could be explained by polypathology, polypharmacy and the deterioration in metabolic functions which are markers of frailty. This study should encourage research into the use of statins in very elderly subjects.

Use of fibrates in the United States and Canada.

CONTEXT: Interest in the role of fibrates intensified after the publication of the negative results from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, which assessed therapy with fenofibrate plus statins. The evidence for clinical benefit in outcomes with the use of fibrates is heavily weighted on the use of the older fibrates such as gemfibrozil and clofibrate. OBJECTIVES: To examine trends in the current use of fibrates and to examine the relationship between differences in the availability and use of brand-name vs generic formulations of fenofibrate and the economic implications in the United States compared with Canada. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Population-level, observational cohort study using IMS Health data from the United States and Canada of patients prescribed fibrates between January 2002 and December 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fibrate prescriptions dispensed and expenditures. RESULTS: In the United States, fibrate prescriptions dispensed increased from 336 prescriptions/100,000 population in January 2002 to 730 prescriptions/100,000 population in December 2009, an increase of 117.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 116.0%-117.9%), whereas in Canada, fibrate prescriptions increased from 402 prescriptions/100,000 population in January 2002 to 474 prescriptions/100,000 population in December 2009, an increase of 18.1% (95% CI, 17.9%-18.3%) (P <.001). In the United States, fenofibrate prescriptions dispensed increased from 150 prescriptions/100,000 population in January 2002 to 440 prescriptions/100,000 population in December 2009, an increase of 159.3% (95% CI, 157.7%-161.0%), comprising 47.9% of total fibrate prescriptions in 2002 and 65.2% in 2009. In Canada, fenofibrate prescriptions increased from 321 prescriptions/100,000 population in January 2002 to 429 prescriptions/100,000 population in December 2009. The annual ratio of generic to brand-name fenofibrate use in the United States ranged from 0:1 to 0.09:1 between 2002 and 2008, while the ratio in Canada steadily increased from 0.51:1 to 1.89:1 between 2005 and 2008. In the United States, crude fenofibrate expenditures increased from $11,535/100,000 population/month in 2002 to $44,975/100,000 population/month in 2009, while the rates in Canada declined from $17,695/100,000 population/month in 2002 to $16,112/100,000 population/month in 2009. Fibrate expenditures per 100,000 population were 3-fold higher in 2009 in the United States compared with Canada. CONCLUSION: During the past decade, prescriptions for fibrates (particularly fenofibrate) increased in the United States, while prescriptions for fibrates in Canada remained stable.

Dyslipidemia in the elderly: should it be treated?

Elderly or older adults constitute a rapidly growing segment of the United States population, thus resulting in an increase in morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular disease-an increase that is reaching epidemic proportions. Dyslipidemia is a well established risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is estimated to account for more than half of the global cases of coronary artery disease. Despite the increased prevalence of dyslipidemia in the older adult population, controversy persists regarding the benefits of treatment in this group. Epidemiologic studies have shown that dyslipidemia is often underdiagnosed and under treated in this population probably as a result of a paucity of evidence regarding the impact of treatment in delaying the progression of atherosclerotic disease, concerns involving increased likelihood of adverse events or drug interactions, or doubts regarding the cost effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in older adults. In conclusion, despite the proven efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy in decreasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, these therapies have been underutilized in older patients.