Pediatric Mental Health Care and Scope-of-Practice Expansions.

To examine the association between psychologist and nurse practitioner scope-of-practice (SoP) regulations and pediatric mental health service access. A nationally representative sample of children with mental health needs was identified using 5 years of National Survey of Children's Health (2016-2020). Utilization was measured in two ways: (1) unmet mental health care needs and (2) receipt of mental health medication. Expanded SoP for psychologists and nurse practitioners was measured based on the child's state of residence and the year of the survey. The associations between both SoP expansion and both outcomes were assessed using logistic regression models adjusted for multiple covariates. The probability of having unmet mental health needs was 5.4 percentage points lower (95% CI - 0.102, - 0.006) for children living in a state with psychologist SoP expansion; however, there was no significant difference in unmet mental health needs between states with and without NP SoP expansion. The probability of receiving a mental health medication was 2.0 percentage points higher (95% CI 0.007, 0.034) for children living in a state with psychologist SoP expansion. Conversely, the probability of receiving a mental health medication was 1.5 percentage points lower (95% CI - 0.023, - 0.007) for children living in a state with NP SoP expansion. Expanded SoP for psychologists is associated with improved access to pediatric mental health care in terms of both unmet need and receiving medication. Expanded SoP for NPs, however, was not associated with unmet need and lower receipt of medication.

Scope of practice regulation in medicine: balancing patient safety, access to care and professional autonomy.

Scope of practice regulation in medicine is crucial for ensuring patient safety, access to care and professional autonomy. This paper explores the impact of scope of practice regulation on healthcare delivery, professional responsibilities and patient outcomes. It discusses the variability in standards for safe practice, the challenges in defining boundaries between medical specialties and the recent controversies in cosmetic surgery practice. The paper also examines the potential benefits and drawbacks of rigorous scope of practice regulations, including their impact on clinical innovation, flexibility and access to care. Furthermore, it delves into the implications of defensive medicine and the consequences of restrictive regulations on patient care. The author proposes implementing a proactive, national, artificial intelligence-powered, real-time outcome monitoring system to address these challenges. This system aims to cover every patient undergoing a surgical procedure and could be gradually extended to non-surgical conditions, benefiting all key stakeholders in the health system. The paper emphasises the need for a balanced approach to scope of practice regulation to avoid stifling clinical innovation and professional autonomy, while ensuring patient safety and professional accountability.

Analysis of the Caribbean Neurosurgery Workforce: Scope of Practice, Challenges, and Ways Forward.

BACKGROUND: The neurosurgical workforce in the Caribbean and surrounding countries is largely unknown due to the diversity in cultural, linguistic, political, financial disparities, and colonial history between the countries. About 45 neurosurgeons serve 16 million people in the Caribbean Community and Common Market, a trade alliance including most Caribbean nations. We aimed to understand the current scope of neurosurgical workforce in this region while highlighting any system challenges and potential solutions for upscaling the workforce. METHODS: We surveyed neurosurgeons within Caribbean countries and surrounding countries online using qualitative and quantitative methods via Qualtrics. RESULTS: Of the 38 countries within the Caribbean and surrounding countries, 26 (68%) were surveyed and of which 18 (69%) replied. In total, 172 regional neurosurgeons were identified, of which 61 (35%) replied-with a majority of general neurosurgeons (56%). Remarkably, the majority of countries failed to meet the threshold workforce density for safe health care-either expressed by full-time equivalent neurosurgeons or neurosurgical centers (see table). Most neurosurgical practices confirmed receiving or sending medical referrals. If so, most referrals took longer than 8 hours without significant difference regarding the destination. Lastly, challenges confronting neurosurgical advancement were found in the following: technology and equipment (40%), trained personnel (31%), hospital or medical center infrastructure (14%), neurosurgical education, and training (44%). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative and quantitative study exploring the current status of the neurosurgical workforce within the Caribbean and surrounding countries. Identifying resources and challenges can contribute to improving regionalized neurosurgical care.

Expanding community pharmacists' scope of practice in relation to contraceptive counselling and referral: a protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomised trial (ALLIANCE).

INTRODUCTION: Improving access to effective contraception has the potential to reduce unintended pregnancy and abortion rates. Community pharmacists could play an expanded role in contraceptive counselling and referral to contraceptive prescribers particularly when women are already attending community pharmacy to obtain emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) or to have medical abortion (MA) medicines dispensed. The ALLIANCE trial aims to compare the subsequent uptake of effective contraception (hormonal or intrauterine) in women seeking ECP or MA medicines, who receive the ALLIANCE community pharmacy-based intervention with those who do not receive the intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ALLIANCE is a stepped-wedge pragmatic cluster randomised trial in Australian community pharmacies. The ALLIANCE intervention involves community pharmacists delivering structured, patient-centred, effectiveness-based contraceptive counselling (and a referral to a contraceptive prescriber where appropriate) to women seeking either ECPs or to have MA medicines dispensed. Women participants will be recruited by participating pharmacists. A total of 37 pharmacies and 1554 participants will be recruited. Pharmacies commence in the control phase and are randomised to transition to the intervention phase at different time points (steps). The primary outcome is the self-reported use of effective contraception at 4 months; secondary outcomes include use of effective contraception and the rate of pregnancies or induced abortions at 12 months. A process and economic evaluation of the trial will also be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (#34563). An explanatory statement will be provided and written consent will be obtained from all participants (pharmacy owner, pharmacist and women) before their commencement in the trial. Dissemination will occur through a knowledge exchange workshop, peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations, social media and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001024730.

Understanding the scope of practice of physician associate/physician associate comparable professions using the World Health Organization global competency and outcomes framework for universal health coverage.

BACKGROUND: Physician Associate and Physician Associate comparable (PA/PA-comparable) professions are classified by the 2012 International Labour Classification of Occupations within ISCO group 2240 paramedical practitioners. However, to date, there is no single global framework which categorizes and/or describes their scopes of practice, or a single unifying occupational group name. In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) published its Global Competency and Outcomes Framework for Universal Health Coverage which focuses on the practice activities for health workers with a pre-service training pathway of 12-48 months, thus including many PA/PA-comparable roles. In this study we describe the similarities and differences between the SOP documents for PA/PA-comparable professions with a pre-service pathway of 12-48 months, thus excluding any extra-training and specializations, from 25 countries using the WHO Framework as a frame of reference. METHODS: SOP documents were collected from 25 countries and mapped to the WHO Framework by 3 independent reviewers. We used descriptive statistics to examine the percent agreement between the WHO Framework and SOP documents by country, as well as the ubiquity of each WHO practice activity across the examined documents. To test the hypothesis that country-specific economic indicators and healthcare workforce metrics may be linked to the presence or absence of specific SOP elements, we utilized Wilkoxon and Fisher Exact tests to examine associations between World Bank economic indicators and country specific healthcare workforce metrics and presence/absence of specific WHO Framework practice activities within each SOP. RESULTS: We identified significant heterogeneity between the WHO practice activities reported in the 25 SOP documents, particularly related to the provision of individual health services. We also identified statistically significant associations between World Bank economic indicators and country specific healthcare workforce metrics and presence/absence of the following seven practice activities relating to Individual Health, Population Health, and Management and Organization practice domains: (1) "Formulating a judgement following a clinical encounter," (2) "Assessing community health needs" (3) "Planning and delivering community health programmes," (4) "Managing public health communication," (5) "Developing preparedness for health emergencies and disasters, including disease outbreaks," (6) "Providing workplace-based learning and supervision," and (7) "Participating in evaluation and research." In each case, presence of the above practice activities was associated with lower health economic and workforce indicators, suggesting that these SOP practice activities are more common in lower income countries and countries with a smaller per-capita health workforce. CONCLUSIONS: The WHO practice activities provide an effective framework to catalogue and compare the responsibilities of PA/PA-comparable professions recorded by country specific SOP documents. This approach could also be used to compare different occupational SOPs within a country, as well as SOPs between countries. The authors propose that additional information relating to the types of procedures and the level of supervision or autonomy would enable a more comprehensive comparison of SOPs, going beyond the granularity offered by the WHO framework. At that level, the evaluation could then be used to inform gap analyses for training needs in the context of migration, or to better understand the health team skill mixes across different countries. The study also offers reflections on the importance of clarity of intended meaning within the SOP documents.

Extended scope of practice needed for Australian rural general surgeons: a review of South Australia's rural general surgical caseload and case mix.

BACKGROUND: There is a shortage of surgeons caring for the 33% of Australians residing in rural and regional areas. In order to help appreciate what rural general surgery entails and optimize training for aspiring rural surgeons, the aim of this study was to analyse the general surgical departments' procedural caseload and casemix in four rural South Australian hospitals. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-centre study involving four rural surgical centres in South Australia (Mt Gambier, Whyalla, Port Augusta, and Port Lincoln). Surgical procedures performed from 2014-2020 were extracted from departmental audits. To identify trends of surgical procedure over time, the data was divided into three time periods (Period 1: February 2014-December 2015, Period 2: January 2016-December 2017, Period 3: January 2018-March 2020). RESULTS: A total of 44 191 surgical procedures were performed, 70.2% being day procedures. 54% were endoscopic procedures, 46% were operative procedures. 60.6% of the operative procedures were general surgery procedures. 28.5% were general surgery-based subspecialty (colorectal, hepato-pancreato-biliary, upper gastrointestinal, and breast). 10.9% were non-general surgery-based subspecialty (urology, plastics, vascular, orthopaedics, head and neck, and obstetrics and gynaecology). There were no statistically significant fluctuations in procedure caseload in all aspects (endoscopic and operative procedures) over the three time periods. CONCLUSION: The majority of a rural Australian general surgeon's procedures are endoscopic. Operative procedures are mainly general surgery based. It may be beneficial to equip aspiring rural general surgeons to manage basic non-general surgery procedures (urological, vascular, and orthopaedic).

Assessing the health impacts of waste management in the context of the circular economy

The circular economy (CE) is about increasing re-use, recycling and energy recovery from existing resources, whilst minimizing disposal. This report considers the public health implications for CE transition relevant to the waste sector. The use of health impact assessment (HIA) is considered as a tool to support strategic and project level decisions about waste management policy and infrastructure. Six HIA case-studies and a literature review are presented, pointing to potential win-wins for the CE and population health. This is particularly the case when it is technically and economically feasible to transition from unsanitary landfill that releases hazardous leachate or open air burning of waste, to modern well operated and maintained energy and materials recovery practices that have greatly reduced health risk profiles. HIA that considers the wider determinants of health and health inequalities can articulate the benefits and risks, supporting more sustainable development practices.

Scope of Practice and Location of 3- Versus 4-Year Family Medicine Residency Graduates.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The John Peter Smith (JPS) Family Medicine Residency Program participated in two national experiments: Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4, 2007-2012) and the Length of Training Pilot, which began in 2013. In these experiments, JPS created optional integrated 4-year areas of emphasis (AOE). The objective of this study was to examine the career outcomes of JPS graduates differentiated by those who completed a 4-year AOE, versus traditional fourth-year fellowship, vs 3-year only. METHODS: We surveyed each graduate who started residency from 2007-2016 on their scope of practice. We also searched each graduate via Google to identify each of their practice sites and ascertain their status as a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) or Medically Underserved Area for primary care (MUA-P). RESULTS: Of the 220 residents who entered the program as interns, 70 completed an integrated AOE (31.8%), 54 completed 3 years of training with a traditional fourth-year fellowship (24.5%, 40 at JPS, 14 at another location), and 93 completed only 3 years of training (42.3%). The overall percentage of JPS graduates who work in the United States (n=201) in HPSAs or MUA-Ps is similar to national numbers (45.3% vs 43.5% for HPSAs, 35.3% vs 33.3% for MUA-Ps). Graduates of a JPS integrated AOE track were more likely to work in a HPSA or MUA-P than other graduates (81.4% vs 38.5% traditional fellowship vs 45.6% 3-year only, P<.001; US practice sites only). Graduates of sports medicine fellowships were particularly less likely to work in HPSAs/MUA-Ps than other graduates (26.1%). Graduates of integrated AOEs provided much broader scopes of cognitive and procedural services than fellowship or 3-year graduates. CONCLUSIONS: In JPS graduates, 4 years of training with an integrated AOE had a large association with serving vulnerable populations, and providing broader cognitive and procedural services.

Trends in Scope of Practice for Oral Health Care: Future Transformative Effects.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The results of this study can help key stakeholders, such as health care facilities, educational and research institutions, insurance companies, and governmental bodies, plan future activities and policies on dental practice and education.

Effects of the ACA Medicaid expansions on access and health by nurse practitioner scope of practice laws.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions increased demand for care whereas the Scope of Practice (SOP) laws for nurse procatitioners affect the supply of primary care providers. It is important to udnerstand the interaction of the demand and supply side policies on measures of access to care and health status. PURPOSE: To examine whether effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions on access to care and health status are moderated by state scope of practice (SOP) laws for nurse practitioners. METHODS: Using data from the 2011 to 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the study used a difference-in-differences design that compared outcome changes between expansion and non-expansion states and evaluated whether these changes differed by state SOP laws. DISCUSSION: Following Medicaid expansion, forgoing a needed doctor's visit due to cost declined more in expansion states with full SOP laws than states with reduced SOP laws by 3.0 percentage-points in years 1 to 3 after the expansion (p < .05). Furthermore, completing a routine checkup with a doctor increased more in expansion states with full SOP laws by 3.2 percentage-points in 4 to 6 years (p < .05). CONCLUSION: The ACA Medicaid expansions were associated with larger gains in certain access measures in states with full SOP laws.

State responses to COVID-19: Potential benefits of continuing full practice authority for primary care nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal and state governments removed the scope of practice restrictions on nurse practitioners (NPs), allowing them to deliver care to patients without restrictions. PURPOSE: To support policy makers' efforts to grant full practice authority to NPs beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript summarizes the existing evidence on the benefits of permanently removing state-level scope of practice barriers and outline recommendations for policy, practice, and research. METHODS: We have conducted a thorough review of the existing literature. FINDINGS: NP full scope of practice improves access and quality of care and leads to better patient outcomes. It also has the potential to reduce health care cost. DISCUSSION: The changes to support full practice authority enacted to address COVID-19 are temporary. NP full practice authority could be part of a longer-term plan to address healthcare inequities and deficiencies rather than merely a crisis measure.

A policy analysis of nurse practitioner scope of practice in Massachusetts.

ABSTRACT: Nurse practitioner (NP) practice has evolved since inception of the role in 1965. Educational requirements have been standardized requiring a master's degree, yet variation in NPs scope of practice exists across the United States. As the population ages and more Americans have health insurance coverage, the demand for health care continues to increase. Shortages of clinical providers and changes in hospital models of care continue to burden the health care system. Nurse practitioners have been found to provide safe, high-quality patient care and are a potential solution to ease the burden on our health care system. Nurse practitioner scope of practice restrictions limit the ability for NPs to practice independently. The purpose of this article was to analyze the advanced practice registered nurse's (APRNs) scope of practice policy in Massachusetts (MA) where APRNs just recently obtained full practice authority. Legislation to remove NP scope of practice restrictions in MA had been presented several times but was met with resistance from physician advocacy groups stating that NPs lack the education requirements to practice independently. A recent report from the MA Health Policy Commission demonstrates the impact that NPs have on lowering health care costs and servicing individuals in underserved areas of the state. During the pandemic, restrictions on NP scope of practice in MA were temporarily removed. It was realized that if NPs can practice independently during a pandemic, then they certainly are competent to practice independently at other times. A reassessment of NP scope of practice to allow for full authority should be completed nationally.

Scope of Practice of US Interventional Cardiologists from an Analysis of Medicare Billing Data.

The contemporary scope of practice of interventional cardiologists (ICs) in the United States and recent trends are unknown. Using Medicare claims from 2013 to 2017, we categorized ICs into 4 practice categories (only percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], PCI with noninvasive imaging, PCI with specialized interventions [peripheral/structural], and all 3 services) and evaluated associations with region, hospital bed size and teaching status, gender, and graduation year. Of 6,083 ICs in 2017, 10.9% performed only PCI, 68.3% PCI with noninvasive imaging, 5.7% PCI with specialized interventions, and 15.1% all 3 services. A higher proportion of Northeast ICs (vs South ICs) were performing only PCI (24.8% vs 7.3%) and PCI with specialized interventions (12% vs 3.4%), but lower PCI and noninvasive imaging (53.8% vs 71.7%) and all 3 services (9.3% and 17.6%). Regarding ICs at larger hospitals (bed size >575 vs <218), a higher proportion was performing only PCI (23.8% vs 5.2%) or PCI with specialized interventions (13.5% vs 1.7%) and lower proportion was performing PCI with noninvasive imaging (48.8% vs 78%), similar to teaching hospitals. Female ICs (vs male ICs) more frequently performed only PCI (18.9% vs 10.6%) and less frequently all 3 services (8.3% vs 15.4%). A lower proportion of recent graduates (2001 to 2016) performed only PCI (9.8% vs 13.8%) and PCI with noninvasive imaging (66.3% vs 72.6%) but a higher proportion performed all 3 services (18% vs 8.4%) than earlier graduates (1959 to 1984). From 2013 to 2017, only PCI and PCI with noninvasive imaging decreased, whereas PCI and specialized interventions and all 3 services increased (all p <0.001). In conclusion, there is marked heterogeneity in practice responsibilities among ICs, which has implications for training and competency assessments.

Dual-eligible beneficiaries and inadequate access to primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether enough primary care providers are in close proximity to where dual-eligible beneficiaries live to provide the capacity needed for integrated care models. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary data analysis using dual-eligible enrollment data and health care workforce data. METHODS: We determined the density of dual-eligible beneficiaries per 1000 population in 2017 for each of 3142 US counties. County-level supply of primary care physicians (PCPs), primary care nurse practitioners, and physician assistants was determined. RESULTS: One-third of the 791 counties with the highest density of dual-eligible beneficiaries had PCP shortages. Counties with the highest density of dual-eligible beneficiaries and the fewest primary care clinicians of any type were concentrated in Southeastern states. These areas also had some of the highest coronavirus disease 2019 outbreaks within their states. CONCLUSIONS: States in the Southeastern region of the United States with some of the most restrictive scope-of-practice laws have an inadequate supply of primary care providers to serve a high concentration of dual-eligible beneficiaries. The fragmented care of the dually eligible population leads to extremely high costs, prompting policy makers to consider integrated delivery models that emphasize primary care. However, primary care workforce shortages will be an enduring challenge without scope-of-practice reforms.

The Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Urology.

The nation's undersupply of urology services disproportionately affects Medicare beneficiaries compared to the general population. Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), most commonly nurse practitioners and physician assistants may be a vehicle to meet this need. The increased use of APPs in urology is hampered by physician discomfort with delegating responsibility to APPs. This discomfort may be compounded by complexities with billing issues and interstate variation in scope of practice regulations. To expand access to urological services while simultaneously ensuring service quality, it is imperative that urologists engage with APPs individually and as a specialty.

State policy change and organizational response: Expansion of nurse practitioner scope of practice regulations in New York State.

BACKGROUND: In January of 2015, New York (NY) implemented a new policy, Nurse Practitioners Modernization Act, which removed the required written practice agreement between physicians and experienced nurse practitioners (NPs). PURPOSE: We examined NP work environment in NY before (2012) and after (2018) the implementation of the new policy. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data on work environments were collected from NPs in NY in 2012 and 2018. Work environment was measured with the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire. In 2012, 278 and in 2018, 348 NPs completed the tool. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between the study year and work environment. FINDINGS: Controlling for individual and organizational characteristics, NPs reported significantly better work environments in 2018. Positive changes were observed both for experienced and less experienced NPs. DISCUSSION: Removing state-level policy restrictions on NPs may promote a better work environment within health care organizations.

Development and Validation of the WHO Rehabilitation Competency Framework: A Mixed Methods Study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the competencies, behaviors, activities, and tasks required by the rehabilitation workforce, and their core values and beliefs, and to validate these among rehabilitation professionals and service users. DESIGN: Mixed methods study, involving a content analysis of rehabilitation-related competency frameworks, a modified Delphi study, and a consultation-based questionnaire of service users. SETTING: Desk-based research. PARTICIPANTS: Participants who completed the first (N=77; 47%) and second (N=68; 67%) iterations of the modified Delphi study. Thirty-seven individuals participated in the service user consultation. Collectively, the participants of the mixed methods study represented a significant range of rehabilitation professions from a broad range of countries, as well as both high- and low-income settings. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: The mixed methods study resulted in the inclusion of 4 core values, 4 core beliefs, 17 competencies, 56 behaviors, 20 activities, and 62 tasks in the Rehabilitation Competency Framework. The content analysis of rehabilitation-related competency frameworks produced an alpha list of competencies, behaviors, activities and tasks ("statements"), which were categorized into 5 domains. The final iteration of the modified Delphi study revealed an average of 95% agreement with the statements, whereas the service user consultation indicated an average of 87% agreement with the statements included in the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the diverse composition of the rehabilitation workforce, this mixed methods study demonstrated that a strong consensus on competencies and behaviors that are shared across professions, specializations, and settings, and for activities and tasks that collectively capture the scope of rehabilitation practice. The development of the Rehabilitation Competency Framework is a pivotal step toward the twin goals of building workforce capability to improve quality of care and strengthening a common rehabilitation workforce identity that will bolster its visibility and influence at a systems-level.

Nurse practitioner students as an essential workforce: The lessons of coronavirus disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted the education and clinical training of nursing students. Clinical sites shut out students over low equipment supplies, physical distancing requirements, and redeployment of staff. PURPOSE AND METHODS: The purpose of this paper is to highlight a progressive solution to engage nurse practitioner students as part of the COVID-19 response given the disruption of their traditional clinical training environments so that student could continue to matriculate and graduate in a timely manner. FINDINGS: Nurse practitioner students swiftly responded and were deemed an essential part of the nursing workforce. DISCUSSION: Policy implications for advanced nursing practice and education for telehealth and simulation research moving forward is also provided.