COMPARISON OF ISOFLURANE AND SEVOFLURANE FOR SHORT-TERM ANESTHESIA IN MEERKATS (SURICATA SURICATTA)-ARE THERE BENEFITS THAT OUTWEIGH COSTS?

Meerkats ( Suricata suricatta ) are routinely anesthetized with isoflurane in zoo and field settings. Twenty healthy adult meerkats of mixed age and sex held in the Zoological Society of London's collection were anesthetized with 4% isoflurane by face mask for routine health examinations. The procedure was repeated 5 mo later in the same group of animals utilizing sevoflurane at 5% for induction, and again 3 mo later with sevoflurane at 6.5% for induction to approximate equipotency with isoflurane. The speed and quality of induction and recovery were compared between the two volatile anesthetic agents. There was no statistically significant difference in the speed of induction across any of the anesthetic regimes. There was a significant difference in recovery times between isoflurane and 6.5% sevoflurane (427 ± 218 and 253 ± 65 sec, respectively [mean ± SD]). Under the conditions of this study, sevoflurane at 6.5% induction dose resulted in better quality induction and recovery than sevoflurane at 5% induction or isoflurane. The mean heart and respiratory rates during anesthesia were higher using 5% sevoflurane for induction but there was no significant difference in either rate between isoflurane and sevoflurane used at a 6.5% induction dose. This study suggests that sevoflurane at a dose of 6.5% for induction and 4% for maintenance is a safe and effective anesthetic agent in healthy adult meerkats. Rapid return to normal behavior after anesthesia is important in all zoo species but particularly so in animals with a complex social and hierarchical structure such as meerkats. For this species, the advantage afforded by the speed of recovery with sevoflurane may offset the cost in certain circumstances.

[Xenon and sevoflurane anti stress activity comparative assessment during elective anaesthesia in pediatric patients].

UNLABELLED: Research objective was to compare Xenon and Sevoflurane anti stress activities during elective anaesthesia in Pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of anaesthesia in 42 patients in age from 1 to 18 years were analyzed. The clinical sings, BIS-index, Somatotropinum hormone and Cortisol levels in patient's blood were studied. RESULTS: Xenon and Sevoflurane provide sufficient level of sedation, analgesia and do not cause Somatotropinum hormone and Cortisol levels increase. CONCLUSION: Xenon and Sevoflurane have the same high anti stress activity However Xenon anaesthesia is characterized by more stable haemodynamics.

Assessment of maxillary and infraorbital nerve blockade for rhinoscopy in sevoflurane anesthetized dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of maxillary and infraorbital nerve blocks for prevention of cardiovascular and qualitative responses to rhinoscopy, as well as response to skin clamping after assigned nerve block placement. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled cross-over experimental study. ANIMALS: Eight random-source mixed breed dogs > 1 year old and weighing between 13 and 22 kg. METHODS: Within three anesthetic episodes, separated by at least 3 days, dogs were assigned to receive either 1 mL lidocaine 2% maxillary nerve block (ML); 0.5 mL lidocaine 2% infraorbital nerve block (IOL); or equal amounts of saline for maxillary or infraorbital nerve block combined as control treatment (S). Monitoring included temperature, respiratory rate, end-tidal CO2 , ECG, heart rate (HR), systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (SAP, DAP, MAP). Posterior (pR) and anterior rhinoscopies (aR) were performed and scored. Differences from baseline for outcome parameters HR, SAP, DAP, MAP were analyzed using repeated-measures anova, and results reported as mean ± SD. Binary scores for rhinoscopy were analyzed using logistic regression, and odds ratio was reported. RESULTS: Changes from baseline for HR and SAP were significant for all treatments, besides ML for pR. Difference in changes from baseline among treatments was statistically significant for HR during pR with ML < S, and for SAP, DAP and MAP in right and left aR with ML < S and IOL > ML, except for DAP in left aR with only IOL > ML. Analysis of the binary score showed that the probability of a response for S and IOL treatments was nearly triple that of the ML treatment. None of the dogs, regardless of the treatments applied, responded to skin clamping. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cardiovascular parameters do not seem to reflect the occurrence of adverse reactions during rhinoscopy. The maxillary nerve block is superior to the infraorbital nerve block, as applied in this study, in preventing adverse reactions during posterior rhinoscopy.

Should sevoflurane be used in the electrophysiology assessment of accessory pathways?

Sevoflurane has been shown to significantly prolong the action potential duration and the QTc interval. Despite this, clinical studies have shown only minor clinical effects on accessory pathway properties under general anaesthesia with sevoflurane compared with conscious sedation with midazolam. This case demonstrates significant prolongation of accessory pathway effective refractory period (APERP) under general anaesthetic with sevoflurane compared with propofol.

Sevoflurane modulation of Ca2+ regulation in skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles from young and mature rabbits.

INTRODUCTION: Developmental differences in splice variants of the two key sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium regulatory proteins, ryanodine (RyR1), and sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium pump (SERCA1) have been linked to various neuromuscular disorders, but not malignant hyperthermia (MH). However, it is unclear whether an age-related difference in volatile anesthetic-mediated SR calcium function exists that could add to our current understanding of the clinical presentation of MH syndrome and provide insight into molecular mechanisms for general anesthesia that may have other physiologic and/or pathophysiologic significance. Therefore, the effects of sevoflurane on intracellular calcium regulation in isolated SR membrane vesicles from the skeletal muscle of healthy young rabbits were compared to their adult counterpart using an established in vitro model with the assumption that exposure to sevoflurane would elicit a weaker response in the young SR. METHODS: Through dual wavelength spectroscopy of Ca(2+): Arsenazo III difference absorbance, the effects of sevoflurane on SR Ca(2+) uptake rate and release in heavy and light fraction SR membrane vesicles isolated from the white muscle of anesthetized, postweaned (age = 6 weeks, n = 5) and adult (age = 6 months, n = 5) male New Zealand rabbits were examined. RESULTS: The adult group showed a 50% increase in Ca(2+) uptake rate from control at both subclinical and clinically relevant anesthetic concentrations, whereas in the SR from the younger animals, Ca(2+) uptake rate was not altered by any concentration of sevoflurane. The sensitivity of both the low and high affinity Ca(2+)-binding sites on RyR1 was increased by sevoflurane to the same extent in the SR vesicles from the young and mature adult rabbits. Interestingly, a greater potency of sevoflurane for the high affinity-binding site was identified, and this was independent of age. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the sensitivity of the SR to sevoflurane-mediated Ca(2+) uptake may be increased with maturity, while an analogous developmental effect on RyR1 is less probable. Nonetheless, this study shows for the first time that a potent inhalational agent such as sevoflurane can influence the high affinity SR calcium-binding site by lowering the extraluminal concentration of calcium necessary to trigger calcium release. While this may not be of consequence when inhaled anesthetics are administered to normal children or adults, it may have life-threatening consequences in carriers of RyR1 mutations.

Assessment of cardiac troponin I and C-reactive protein concentrations associated with anesthetic protocols using sevoflurane or a combination of fentanyl, midazolam, and sevoflurane in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To report serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations in dogs anesthetized for elective surgery using two anesthetic protocols. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical study. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs presenting for elective ovariohysterectomy or castration. METHODS: The dogs were randomized into two groups. All dogs were premedicated with glycopyrrolate (0.011 mg kg(-1)) and hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg(-1)) i.m. approximately 30 minutes prior to induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia in dogs in group 1 was induced with propofol (6 mg kg(-1)) i.v. to effect and in dogs in group 2 with diazepam (0.2 mg kg(-1)) i.v. followed by etomidate (2 mg kg(-1)) i.v. to effect. For maintenance of anesthesia, group 1 received sevoflurane (adjustable vaporizer setting 0.5-4%) and group 2 received a combination of fentanyl (0.8 microg kg(-1) minute(-1)) and midazolam (8.0 microg kg(-1) minute(-1)) i.v. plus sevoflurane (adjustable vaporizer setting 0.5-4%) to maintain anesthesia. Serum cTnI and CRP concentrations were measured at baseline and 6, 18, and 24 hours post-anesthetic induction. Biochemical analysis was performed at baseline. Lactate was obtained at baseline and 6 hours post-anesthetic induction. Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were measured intra-operatively. RESULTS: Baseline serum cTnI and CRP concentrations were comparable between groups. A significant difference in serum cTnI or CRP concentrations was not detected post-operatively between groups at any time point. Serum CRP concentrations were significantly increased post-anesthetic induction in both groups, which was attributed to surgical trauma. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There was no significant difference in serum cTnI and CRP concentrations between anesthetic protocols. Further investigation in a larger number of dogs is necessary to confirm the current findings.

Cost analysis of three anesthetic regimens under auditory evoked potentials monitoring in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cost analyses of different anesthetic techniques have not been investigated in Taiwan. We compared propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), sevoflurane (SEVO) and desflurane (DES) anesthesias for cost and outcome under A-line auditory evoked potentials (AEP) monitoring. METHODS: We studied 90 consecutive female patients (ASAI-II) scheduled to undergo elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. The study was prospective, randomized, and single-blind in design. All patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: i.e. groups TIVA, SEVO and DES. The A-line auditory evoked potential index (AAI) was maintained between 15-25. At the start of skin closure, the applied anesthetic was discontinued, and time of recovery from anesthesia was thenceforth reckoned until spontaneous opening of eyes and extubation. The costs of drugs were counted in New Taiwan (NT) dollars. RESULTS: The total cost was significantly higher in the SEVO and DES groups than in the TIVA group (NT 1,243, 1028, and 889, respectively) (P < 0.001). In addition, the cost of the principal anesthetic drug was significantly higher in the SEVO than in the DES and TIVA groups (NT 756, 530, and 468, respectively) (P < 0.01). Faster recovery was seen in the TIVA group than in the DES group and SEVO group (8.2, 13.7, 16.2 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). Incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain were not significantly different among 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of TIVA with propofol was less than SEVO or DES anesthesia and moreover, propofol TIVA offered benefit of faster recovery in our study.

Mg2+ dependence of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum induced by sevoflurane or halothane in skeletal muscle from humans susceptible to malignant hyperthermia.

BACKGROUND: In normal resting muscle, cytosolic Mg(2+) exerts a potent inhibitory influence on the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) release channel (ryanodine receptor, RyR1). Impaired Mg(2+)-regulation of RyR1 has been proposed as a causal factor in malignant hyperthermia (MH). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cytosolic Mg(2+) on SR Ca(2+) release induced by halothane or sevoflurane in normal (MHN) and MH susceptible (MHS) human skeletal muscle fibres. METHODS: Samples of vastus medialis muscle were obtained from patients under investigation for MH susceptibility. Single fibres were mechanically skinned and perfused with solutions mimicking the intracellular milieu. Changes in [Ca(2+)](i) were detected using fura-2 fluorescence after application of equimolar halothane or sevoflurane. RESULTS: In MHN fibres, concentrations of sevoflurane or halothane as high as 10 mM typically failed to induce SR Ca(2+) release at physiological free [Mg(2+)] (1 mM). However, when [Mg(2+)] was decreased to 0.4 mM, SR Ca(2+) release occurred in 51% (16/33) and 6% (2/33) of MHN fibres after the addition of 1 mM halothane or 1 mM sevoflurane, respectively. Further decreases in [Mg(2+)] increased the proportion of responsive fibres. In the presence of 0.1 mM [Mg(2+)], Ca(2+) release occurred in all fibres (33/33) after the introduction of 1 mM halothane or 1 mM sevoflurane. In MHS fibres, 1 mM halothane or 1 mM sevoflurane-induced Ca(2+) release in 54% (7/13) or 15% (2/13) of fibres, respectively, at 1 mM Mg(2+). A decrease in [Mg(2+)] to 0.2 mM Mg(2+) was sufficient to render 100% of MHS fibres (13/13) responsive to 1 mM halothane or 1 mM sevoflurane. CONCLUSIONS: In both MHS and MHN fibres (i) halothane is a more potent activator of SR Ca(2+) release than sevoflurane and (ii) as with halothane, the efficacy of sevoflurane-induced SR Ca(2+) release exhibits a marked dependence on cytosolic [Mg(2+)]. The marked potentiation of SR Ca(2+) release after a moderate reduction in cytosolic [Mg(2+)] suggests that conditions which cause hypomagnesaemia will increase the probability and possibly severity of an MH event. Conversely, maintenance of a normal or slightly increased cytosolic [Mg(2+)] may reduce the probability of MH.

[Assessment of health risk of sevoflurane and isoflurane exposure among surgical staff: a problem for employers]. / Ocena ryzyka zwiazanego z narazeniem personelu medycznego na dzialanie sewofluranu i izofluranu, wziewnych srodków anestetycznych--problem dla pracodawców.

Sevoflurane and isoflurane are polyfluorinated anesthetics used during surgical treatment of both adults and children. They are usually applied as mixtures with oxygen or dinitrogen monoxide. An assessment of health risk of exposure to these inhalant anesthetics poses a serious problem for employers, mostly due to the fact that maximum admissible concentrations (MAC) for these compounds have not been established. Consequently, there is no obligation to measure their air concentration in the workplace. However, the employer is responsible for determining whether or not a given hazardous agent is present in the work environment. The setting of MAC values for sevoflurane and isoflurane has recently been considered by the Expert Group for Chemical Hazards that proposed to accept 55 mg/m3 (7 ppm) and 32 mg/m3 (4 ppm), respectively as MAC values in assessing workplace hazards. These exposure levels should protect the surgical staff from adverse neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, and irritant effects.

Assessment of the relationship of bispectral index values, hemodynamic changes, and recovery times associated with sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bispectral index (BIS) values in pigs during anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane-fentanyl or propofol-fentanyl as a predictor of changes in hemodynamic parameters and duration of recovery from anesthesia. ANIMALS: 12 pigs. PROCEDURE: Pigs were randomly allocated to undergo 1 of 2 anesthetic regimens. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg/kg, i.v.); 6 pigs were administered sevoflurane via inhalation (1 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] at a fresh gas flow rate of 3 L/min; group I), and 6 were administered propofol (11 mg/kg/h, i.v.; group II). All pigs received fentanyl (2.5 mg/kg, i.v., q 30 min). After abdominal surgery, pigs were allowed to recover from anesthesia. Cardiovascular variables and BIS values were recorded at intervals throughout the procedure; duration of recovery from anesthesia was noted. RESULTS: No correlation was established between arterial blood pressure and BIS and between heart rate and BIS. Mean BIS at discontinuation of administration of the anesthetic agent was greater in group-II pigs (65.2 +/- 10.6 minutes) than in group-I pigs (55.8 +/- 2.9 minutes). However, recovery from anesthesia was significantly longer in group II (59.80 +/- 2.52 minutes) than in group I (9.80 +/- 2.35 minutes). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In swine anesthetized with sevoflurane or propofol and undergoing abdominal surgery, the BIS value derived from an electroencephalogram at the end of anesthesia was not useful for predicting the speed of recovery from anesthesia. Moreover, BIS was not useful as a predictor of clinically important changes in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in those anesthetized pigs.

Sevoflurane: an ideal agent for adult day-case anesthesia?

Sevoflurane has several properties which make it potentially useful as a day case anaesthetic. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol, awakening from sevoflurane is faster compared to isoflurane, faster or similar compared to propofol and comparable (in the majority of studies) to desflurane. Subsequent recovery and discharge is generally similar following all agents. Sevoflurane may also be used to induce anaesthesia, which is generally well-received and causes less hypotension and apnoea compared to propofol. When used as a maintenance anaesthetic, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after sevoflurane is comparable to other inhaled anaesthetics, but this complication appears more common after inhaled inductions. The tolerability and low solubility of sevoflurane facilitate titration of anaesthesia and may reduce the need for opioid analgesia, which in turn may limit the occurrence of nausea and vomiting.

Assessment of halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia in spontaneously breathing rats.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia in spontaneously breathing rats. ANIMALS: 16 healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats. PROCEDURE: 8 rats were anesthetized with halothane and 8 with sevoflurane. Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined. Variables were recorded at anesthetic concentrations of 0.8, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5 times the MAC of halothane and 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, and 1.75 times the MAC of sevoflurane. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SEM) MAC for halothane was 1.02 +/- 0.02% and for sevoflurane was 2.99 +/- 0.19%. As sevoflurane dose increased from 1.0 to 1.75 MAC, mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased from 103.1 +/- 5.3 to 67.9 +/- 4.6 mm Hg, and PaCO2 increased from 58.8 +/- 3.1 to 92.2 +/- 9.2 mm Hg. As halothane dose increased from 0.8 to 1.5 MAC, MAP decreased from 99 +/- 6.2 to 69.8 +/- 4.5 mm Hg, and PaCO2 increased from 59.1 +/- 2.1 to 75.9 +/- 5.2 mm Hg. Respiratory rate decreased in a dose-dependent fashion from 88.5 +/- 4.5 to 58.5 +/- 2.7 breaths/min during halothane anesthesia and from 42.3 +/- 1.8 to 30.5 +/- 4.5 breaths/min during sevoflurane anesthesia. Both groups of rats had an increase in eyelid and pupillary aperture with an increase in anesthetic dose. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An increase in PaCO2 and a decrease in MAP are clinical indicators of an increasing halothane and sevoflurane dose in unstimulated spontaneously breathing rats. Increases in eyelid aperture and pupil diameter are reliable signs of increasing depth of halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Decreasing respiratory rate is a clinical indicator of an increasing dose of halothane.

Propofol and sevoflurane in subanesthetic concentrations act preferentially on the spinal cord: evidence from multimodal electrophysiological assessment.

BACKGROUND: Animal experiments in recent years have shown that attenuation of motor responses by general anesthetics is mediated at least partly by spinal mechanisms. Less is known about the relative potency of anesthetic drugs in suppressing cortical and spinal electrophysiological responses in vivo in humans, particularly those, but not only those, connected with motor responses. Therefore, we studied the effects of sevoflurane and propofol in humans using multimodal electrophysiological assessment. METHODS: We studied nine healthy volunteers in two sessions during steady state sedation with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 microg/l (targeted plasma concentration) propofol or 0.2 and 0.4 vol% (end-tidal) sevoflurane. Following a 15-min equilibration period, motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral (H-reflex, F-wave) stimulation were recorded, while electroencephalography and auditory evoked responses were recorded in parallel. RESULTS: At concentrations corresponding to two thirds of C(50 awake), motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation were reduced by approximately 50%, H-reflex amplitude was reduced by 22%, F-wave amplitude was reduced by 40%, and F-wave persistence was reduced by 25%. No significant differences between sevoflurane and propofol were found. At this concentration, the Bispectral Index was reduced by 7%, and the middle-latency auditory evoked responses were attenuated only mildly (N(b) latency increased by 11%, amplitude P(a)N(b) did not change). In contrast, the postauricular reflex was suppressed by 77%. CONCLUSIONS: The large effect of both anesthetics on all spinal motor responses, compared with the small effect on electroencephalography and middle-latency auditory evoked responses, assuming that they represent cortical modulation, may suggest that the suppression of motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation is largely due to submesencephalic effects.

Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: comparisons between sevoflurane and propofol using fentanyl as a co-induction agent. A pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway using sevoflurane or propofol plus fentanyl. We evaluated the haemodynamic changes and cost of induction of anaesthesia in both groups. METHODS: Sixty patients were equally and randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1). Patients in the sevoflurane group were induced with 8% sevoflurane and those in the propofol group with propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1). Conditions for insertion were graded on a three-point scale using six variables. Overall, conditions were assessed as excellent, satisfactory or poor based on the total score in each group. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded for 6 min after mask insertion. The financial cost of induction in both groups was calculated. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) time taken from induction to successful laryngeal mask insertion was significantly shorter with propofol (68.70 +/- 22.60 s) compared with sevoflurane (149.83 +/- 55.25 s). Excellent or satisfactory conditions were observed in 30 (100%) patients in the propofol group and in 29 (96.66%) in the sevoflurane group. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were significantly lower in the propofol group. The cost of sevoflurane used was 3.95 euros +/- 1.48 (Rs 216.23 +/- 64.66) (P < 0.05) compared with that of propofol, which was 3.23 euros +/- 0.65 (Rs 141.00 +/- 28.20). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a faster induction with propofol-fentanyl, conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway were similar in both groups. Haemodynamic stability was better with sevoflurane-fentanyl. The propofol-fentanyl combination was more cost-effective.

Sevoflurance: approaching the ideal inhalational anesthetic. a pharmacologic, pharmacoeconomic, and clinical review.

Sevoflurane is a safe and versatile inhalational anesthetic compared with currently available agents. Sevoflurane is useful in adults and children for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia in inpatient and outpatient surgery. Of all currently used anesthetics, the physical, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of sevoflurane come closest to that of the ideal anesthetic (200). These characteristics include inherent stability, low flammability, non-pungent odor, lack of irritation to airway passages, low blood:gas solubility allowing rapid induction of and emergence from anesthesia, minimal cardiovascular and respiratory side effects, minimal end-organ effects, minimal effect on cerebral blood flow, low reactivity with other drugs, and a vapor pressure and boiling point that enables delivery using standard vaporization techniques. As a result, sevoflurane has become one of the most widely used agents in its class.

Cost comparison of sevoflurane with isoflurane anesthesia in arthroscopic menisectomy surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the "real world" cost of sevoflurane compared with isoflurane in balanced general anesthesia for daycare arthroscopic menisectomy, we prospectively investigated perioperative drug requirement and expense as well as recovery time. METHODS: Following intravenous induction, 40 consenting adult patients randomly received either sevoflurane- or isoflurane-based anesthesia with a standardized gas inflow rate of 3 l x min. Recovery was assessed in the postanesthetic recovery room (PARR) in a double-blind manner at 15 min intervals using the Aldrete scoring system until patients met discharge criteria. RESULTS: Patient demographics, anesthetic duration, volatile potency and adjunct drug requirements were similar in the two groups. Total perioperative drug cost per patient was CAN$38.10+/-10.13 (mean +/- SD) for the sevoflurane group and $23.87+/-6.59 for the isoflurane group (P<0.01). Although the nonvolatile drug cost was comparable between the two groups, the volatile drug cost per patient was $19.40+/-8.80 for sevoflurane and $4.50+/-1.90 for isoflurane (P<0.01). This four-fold sevoflurane-to-isoflurane cost difference was the product of two ratios, both based on the volume of liquid anesthetic: the ratio of consumption, 2.1; and the ratio of institutional price, 2.1. Intraoperative hemodynamic response, time until discharge from the PARR and incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: When used to maintain equipotent balanced general anesthesia for daycare arthroscopic menisectomy, volatile consumption and cost were greater for sevoflurane compared with isoflurane. Nonvolatile perioperative drug cost and recovery times were similar, however, in the two groups.

Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Office-based surgery is becoming increasingly popular because of its cost-saving potential Both propofol and sevoflurane are commonly used in the ambulatory setting because of their favorable recovery profiles. This clinical investigation was designed to compare the clinical effects, recovery characteristics, and cost-effectiveness of propofol and sevoflurane when used alone or in combination for office-based anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred four outpatients undergoing superficial surgical procedures at an office-based surgical center were randomly assigned to one of three general anesthetic groups. In groups I and II, propofol 2 mg/kg was administered for induction followed by propofol 75-150 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (group I) or sevoflurane 1-2% (group II) with N2O 67% in oxygen for maintenance of anesthesia In group m, anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in combination with N2O 67% in oxygen. Local anesthetics were injected at the incision site before skin incision and during the surgical procedure. The recovery profiles, costs of drugs, and resources used, as well as patient satisfaction, were compared among the three treatment groups. RESULTS: Although early recovery variables (e.g., eye opening, response to commands, and sitting up) were similar in all three groups, the times to standing up and to be "home ready" were significantly prolonged when sevoflurane-N2O was used for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The time to tolerating fluids, recovery room stay, and discharge times were significantly decreased when propofol was used for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Similarly, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the need for rescue antiemetics were also significantly reduced after propofol anesthesia. Finally, the total costs and patient satisfaction were more favorable when propofol was used for induction and maintenance of office-based anesthesia CONCLUSION: Compared with sevoflurane-N2O, use of propofol-N2O for office-based anesthesia was associated with an improved recovery profile, greater patient satisfaction, and lower costs. There were significantly more patients who were dissatisfied with the sevoflurane anesthetic technique.

Echocardiographic assessment of ventricular performance following induction with two anesthetics.

Echocardiographic studies were made of 20 healthy patients scheduled for minor surgical procedures to determine whether this technique could be used routinely in the operating room and to evaluate the effects of halothane and enflurane on left ventricular performance. Thirteen minutes following induction of anesthesia with halothane in ten patients (mean end-tidal halothane concentration 0.93 per cent), mean arterial blood pressure, left ventricular (LV) diastolic dimension, LV fractional shortening, mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening and systolic thickening of the posterior LV wall were significantly decreased. LV systolic dimension was increased significantly. These data indicate that halothane caused decreased contractility in the presence of a decreased afterload. Twelve minutes following induction of anesthesia with enflurane in ten patients (mean delivered enflurane concentration 2.4 per cent), mean arterial blood pressure and LV systolic and diastolic dimensions were decreased, while heart rate was increased significantly, indicating that enflurane caused vasodilatation and may have had some depressant effect on contractility. Echocardiography is a non-invasive, safe and relatively rapid method that can be used in the perioperative period to assess cardiac function and to evaluate the effects of pharmacologic agents on the heart.