Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0271284, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35913985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) affects four million people worldwide annually and has an estimated lifetime prevalence of 5-10% in the general population. Worldwide, there are significant heterogeneities in coping approaches of healthcare systems with PUD in prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Quantifying and benchmarking health systems' performance is crucial yet challenging to provide a clearer picture of the potential global inequities in the quality of care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the health-system quality-of-care and inequities for PUD among age groups and sexes worldwide. METHODS: Data were derived from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2019. Principal-Component-Analysis was used to combine age-standardized mortality-to-incidence-ratio, disability-adjusted-life-years-to-prevalence-ratio, prevalence-to-incidence-ratio, and years-of-life-lost-to-years-lived-with-disability-into a single proxy named Quality-of-Care-Index (QCI). QCI was used to compare the quality of care among countries. QCI's validity was investigated via correlation with the cause-specific Healthcare-Access-and-Quality-index, which was acceptable. Inequities were presented among age groups and sexes. Gender Disparity Ratio was obtained by dividing the score of women by that of men. RESULTS: Global QCI was 72.6 in 1990, which increased by 14.6% to 83.2 in 2019. High-income-Asia-pacific had the highest QCI, while Central Latin America had the lowest. QCI of high-SDI countries was 82.9 in 1990, which increased to 92.9 in 2019. The QCI of low-SDI countries was 65.0 in 1990, which increased to 76.9 in 2019. There was heterogeneity among the QCI-level of countries with the same SDI level. QCI typically decreased as people aged; however, this gap was more significant among low-SDI countries. The global Gender Disparity Ratio was close to one and ranged from 0.97 to 1.03 in 100 of 204 countries. CONCLUSION: QCI of PUD improved dramatically during 1990-2019 worldwide. There are still significant heterogeneities among countries on different and similar SDI levels.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Úlcera Péptica , Idoso , Feminino , Carga Global da Doença , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(2): 296-305, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105195

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has been decreasing over time with Helicobacter pylori eradication and use of acid-suppressing therapies. However, PUD remains a common cause of hospitalization in the United States. We aimed to evaluate contemporary national trends in the incidence, treatment patterns, and outcomes for PUD-related hospitalizations and compare care delivery by hospital rurality. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to estimate weighted annual rates of PUD-related hospitalizations. Temporal trends were evaluated by joinpoint regression and expressed as annual percent change with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We determined the proportion of hospitalizations requiring endoscopic and surgical interventions, stratified by clinical presentation and rurality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: There was a 25.8% reduction (P < 0.001) in PUD-related hospitalizations from 2005 to 2014, although the rate of decline decreased from -7.2% per year (95% CI: 13.2% to -0.7%) before 2008 to -2.1% per year (95% CI: 3.0% to -1.1%) after 2008. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (95% CI: 2.4%-2.5%). Upper endoscopy (84.3% vs 78.4%, P < 0.001) and endoscopic hemostasis (26.1% vs 16.8%, P < 0.001) were more likely to be performed in urban hospitals, whereas surgery was performed less frequently (9.7% vs 10.5%, P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, patients managed in urban hospitals were at higher risk for postoperative morbidity (odds ratio 1.16 [95% CI: 1.04-1.29]), but not death (odds ratio 1.11 [95% CI: 1.00-1.23]). DISCUSSION: The rate of decline in hospitalization rates for PUD has stabilized over time, although there remains significant heterogeneity in treatment patterns by hospital rurality.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Rurais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiologia , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Hemostase Endoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/terapia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Gástrica/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Surg Endosc ; 35(5): 2198-2205, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32394167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effective hemostasis is essential to prevent rebleeding. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) system compared to combined therapy (through-the-scope clips with epinephrine injection) as a first-line endoscopic treatment for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 95 patients from a single, tertiary center and underwent either OTSC (n = 46) or combined therapy (n = 49). The primary outcome of the present study was the efficacy of the OTSC system as a first-line therapy in patients with high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers compared to combined therapy with TTS clips and epinephrine injection. The secondary outcomes included the rebleeding rate, perforation rate, mean procedure time, reintervention rate, mean procedure cost and days of hospitalization in the two study groups within 30 days of the index procedure. RESULTS: All patients achieved hemostasis within the procedure; two patients in the OTSC group and four patients in the combined therapy group developed rebleeding (p = 0.444). No patients experienced gastrointestinal perforation. OTSC had a shorter median procedure time than combined therapy (11 min versus 20 min; p < 0.001). The procedure cost was superior for OTSC compared to combined therapy ($102,000 versus $101,000; p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the rebleeding prevention rate (95.6% versus 91.8%, p = 0.678), hospitalization days (3 days versus 4 days; p = 0.215), and hospitalization costs ($108,000 versus $240,000, p = 0.215) of the OTSC group compared to the combined therapy group. CONCLUSION: OTSC treatment is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers. OTSC confers comparable costs and patient outcomes as combined treatments, with a shorter procedure time.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemostase Endoscópica/métodos , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemostase Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Hemostase Endoscópica/economia , Hemostase Endoscópica/instrumentação , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
Am J Surg ; 216(6): 1127-1128, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30224069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While advances in diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease have led to a decrease in hospital admissions the socioeconomic distribution of these benefits is unknown. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2013 including all patients that were admitted for peptic ulcer disease. We compared the types of ulcer related complications, the rates of intervention and the outcomes based on race and insurance status. RESULTS: Of 42,046 patients admitted for peptic ulcer disease 80.25% had an ulcer related complication. Black patients had the lowest rates of bleeding and highest rates of perforation and were less likely to undergo surgery for their complication but mortality was not different from white patients. Uninsured patients also had lower rates of bleeding and higher rates of perforation and they were at increased risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other surgical conditions insurance status, not race, predicts mortality in peptic ulcer disease.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
6.
Lakartidningen ; 1152018 07 19.
Artigo em Sueco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30040110

RESUMO

Knowledge development and paradigm shift for peptic ulcer disease is described over a fifty-year period using four levels of knowledge that place demands on the healthcare organization. When medical knowledge reached a healing level, continuity became subordinate. However, accessibility to treatment became more important. An important task for future healthcare will be to define and create broader knowledge structures. Efficiency losses can occur when control instruments apply to medical problems at low levels of knowledge which are not mature for this.


Assuntos
Úlcera Péptica , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , História do Século XX , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Gestão do Conhecimento , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica/história , Úlcera Péptica/terapia
7.
Obes Surg ; 25(5): 805-11, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25381115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One of the long-term complications of laparoscopic Roux-and-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the development of marginal ulcers (MU). The aim of the present study is to assess the incidence, risk factors, symptomatology and management of patients with symptomatic MU after LRYGB surgery. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent a LRYGB from 2006 until 2011 were evaluated in this study. Signs of abdominal pain, pyrosis, nausea or other symptoms of ulcer disease were analysed. Acute symptoms of (perforated) MU such as severe abdominal pain, vomiting, melena and haematemesis were also collected. Patient baseline characteristics, medication and intoxications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with MU. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients underwent a LRYGB. Minimal follow-up was 24 months. Twenty-three patients (6.6%) developed a symptomatic MU of which four (1.1%) presented with perforation. Smoking, the use of corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was significantly associated with the development of MU. Five out of 23 patients (22%) underwent surgery. All other patients could be treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Marginal ulcers occurred in 6.6% of the patients after a LRYGB. Smoking, the use of corticosteroids and the use of NSAIDs were associated with an increased risk of MU. Most patients were managed conservatively.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Úlcera Péptica/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
8.
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek ; 173(2): 100-4, 2014.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25055546

RESUMO

An analysis of reporting and statistical data showed the considerable changes in clinical-epidemiological indices of gastric and duodenum ulcer at the period from 1998 to 2012. The prevalence of the disease and the number of primary patients decreased in 2-3 times. The reduction of the rate of perforations and ulcerous bleeding had been observed. However, the authors noted, that a tendency of frequency of occurrence increased and efficacy indices reduced in the last years. The rate of postoperative lethality raised in the cases of perforated ulcer. On this basis, the authors recommend to reconsider the existing opinion about further extension of out-patient treatment of patients with given pathology.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada , Úlcera Péptica , Adulto , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica/fisiopatologia , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/etiologia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/mortalidade , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/fisiopatologia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/cirurgia , Prevalência , Federação Russa/epidemiologia , Análise de Sobrevida
9.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 48(2): 113-8, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23685847

RESUMO

GOALS: To evaluate sources of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) at an urban US hospital and compare them to sources at the same center 20 years ago, and to assess clinical outcomes related to source of UGIB. BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest changes in causes and outcomes of UGIB. STUDY: Consecutive patients with hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia undergoing upper endoscopy with an identified source at LA County+USC Medical Center from January 2005 to June 2011 were identified retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean age of the 1929 patients was 52 years; 75% were male. A total of 1073 (55%) presented with hematemesis, 809 (42%) with melena alone, and 47 (2%) with hematochezia alone. The most common causes were ulcers in 654 patients (34%), varices in 633 (33%), and erosive esophagitis in 156 (8%), compared with 43%, 33%, and 2% in 1991. During hospitalization, 207 (10.7%) patients required repeat endoscopy for UGIB (10.6% for both ulcers and varices) and 129 (6.7%) died (5.2% for ulcers; 9.2% for varices). On multivariate analysis, hematemesis (OR=1.38; 95% CI, 1.04-1.88) and having insurance (OR=1.44; 95% CI, 1.07-1.94) were associated with repeat endoscopy for UGIB. Varices (OR=1.53; 95% CI, 1.05-2.22) and having insurance (OR=4.53; 95% CI, 2.84-7.24) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Peptic ulcers decreased modestly over 2 decades, whereas varices continue as a common cause of UGIB at an urban hospital serving lower socioeconomic patients. Inpatient mortality, but not rebleeding requiring endoscopy, was higher with variceal than nonvariceal UGIB, indicating patients with variceal UGIB remain at risk of death from decompensation of underlying illness even after successful control of bleeding.


Assuntos
Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/complicações , Esofagite/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/mortalidade , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Esofagite/terapia , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidade , Hematemese/etiologia , Hematemese/mortalidade , Hematemese/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Melena/etiologia , Melena/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/mortalidade , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/etiologia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidade , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
Voen Med Zh ; 334(2): 8-12, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23808197

RESUMO

The round-up article is devoted to the history of gastroenterology. The authors deal with a subject of aetiology, pathogenesis and treatment of diseases associated with destruction of mucous coat of GI tract. The main criteria of military-and-medical and medical-and-social assessment used in evaluation of patients with different forms of peptic ulcer are performed.


Assuntos
Medicina Militar/métodos , Úlcera Péptica/etiologia , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Gastroenterologia/história , Gastroenterologia/métodos , Gastroenterologia/normas , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Medicina Militar/história , Medicina Militar/normas , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica/patologia
11.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 47(1): 36-42, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22126650

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: There have been no reported data on the medical care cost of idiopathic peptic ulcer disease (PUD) compared with H. pylori (+) and/or NSAID (+) cases although H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers are increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct medical care costs of PUD based on whether it was H. pylori infection/from NSAIDs or idiopathic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy three patients with PUD comprising H. pylori and/or NSAID use-associated PUD (n = 145) and idiopathic PUD (n = 28) were prospectively enrolled in this study. The direct medical care costs were analyzed retrospectively for the patients with PUD during a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The recurrence rate within one year was significantly higher in idiopathic PUD than H. pylori and/or NSAID-associated PUD (p = 0.002). Direct medical care costs of idiopathic PUD ($2483.8) were higher than in patients with H. pylori and/or NSAID-associated PUD ($1751.8) resulting from longer duration of medication and higher proportion of endoscopic hemostasis and hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: More clinical research is needed to improve outcome and reduce recurrence rate and medical care costs of idiopathic PUD.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica/economia , Úlcera Péptica/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Recidiva , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 21(4): 535-44, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15899102

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of work loss associated with gastro- the relationship of work loss associated with gastro- the relationship of work loss associated with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and peptic ulcer disease (GERD) and peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in a large population of employed individuals in the United States (US) and quantify the individuals in the United States (US) and quantify the economic impact of these diseases to the employer. METHODS: A proprietary database that contained work place absence, disability and workers' compensation data in addition to prescription drug and medical claims was used to answer the objectives. Employees with a medical claim with an ICD-9 code for GERD or PUD were identified from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2000. A cohort of controls was identified for the same time period using the method of frequency matching on age, gender, industry type, occupational status, and employment status. Work absence rates and health care costs were compared between the groups after adjusting for demo graphic, and employment differences using analysis of covariance models. RESULTS: There were significantly lower (p < 0.05) prescription, and outpatient costs in the controls compared to the disease groups, although the eta-square values were very low. The mean work absence attributed to sick days was 2.8 (+/- 2.3) for controls, 3.4 (+/- 2.5) for GERD, 3.2 (+/- 2.6) for PUD, and 3.2 (+/- 2.3) days for GERD + PUD. For work loss, a significantly higher (p < 0.05) rate of adjusted all-cause absenteeism and sickness-related absenteeism were observed between the disease groups versus the controls. In particular, controls had an average of 1.2 to 1.6 days and 0.4 to 0.6 lower all-cause and sickness-related absenteeism compared to the disease groups. The incremental economic impact projected to a hypothetical employed population was estimated to be $3441 for GERD, $1374 for PUD, and $4803 for GERD + PUD per employee per year compared to employees without these diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Direct medical cost and work absence in employees with GERD, PUD and GERD + PUD represent a significant burden to employees and employers.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Úlcera Péptica/economia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/economia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Local de Trabalho
14.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 17 Suppl B: 62B-64B, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12845355

RESUMO

Medical ethics are not absolute; they change according to social attitudes, technological advances and alterations in the doctor/patient relationship. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori highlighted entrenched attitudes in academia and the pharmaceutical industry that were not always appropriate. The explosion of research that followed was ethically controlled by local research ethics committees and the system of peer review and editorial responsibility. Now that effective treatments are available, the control arm in trials of new therapy should be either placebo (giving the option of effective treatment later) or a first-line treatment; mono and dual therapy should not be employed because of the risk of inducing bacterial resistance. Ethical issues that still remain include whether always to test patients for H pylori at endoscopy and what information should be given when they test positive. The most important issue is the approach of the medical profession to the high death rate carried by H pylori infection. Peptic ulcer and gastric cancer together account for a large number of deaths worldwide, and the medical profession and public health services have not yet grappled with this problem, neither advocating universal testing and treatment nor funding or research to determine whether this approach would be effective.


Assuntos
Ética Médica , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Ética em Pesquisa , Infecções por Helicobacter/economia , Infecções por Helicobacter/mortalidade , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica/mortalidade , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Revelação da Verdade
15.
JAMA ; 286(16): 1985-93, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11667935

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Since publication in 1994 of guidelines for management of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), trends in physician practice and outcomes related to guideline application have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in process of care that occurred in a quality improvement program for patients hospitalized with PUD and to evaluate associations between in-hospital treatment of PUD and 1-year rehospitalization for PUD and mortality in a subset of these patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cohort study of 4292 sequential Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized at acute care hospitals with a principal diagnosis of PUD in 5 states (Colorado, Georgia, Connecticut, Oklahoma, and Virginia) in 1995 (baseline) and 1997 (remeasurement); outcomes were evaluated for 752 patients in Colorado. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in rates of screening for Helicobacter pylori infection, treatment for H pylori infection, screening for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, counseling about NSAID use; outcomes included rehospitalization for PUD and all-cause mortality within 1 year of discharge in Colorado. RESULTS: Screening for H pylori infection increased significantly (12%-19% increase; P<.001) in each of the 5 states. Treatment of H pylori infection increased in each state and was significantly increased for the entire group of hospitalizations examined (8% increase overall; P =.001). Despite increased screening, detection of H pylori infection was less frequent than expected in every state, (13%-24%) and did not increase in any state. Screening for and counseling about NSAIDs did not significantly increase overall or in any state. In the Colorado cohort, the proportion of patients rehospitalized was unchanged in 1995 (8.9%) and 1997 (6.8%), and 124 patients (16%) in the combined 1995 and 1997 cohorts died within 1 year. Treatment for H pylori was not associated with a reduction in rehospitalization within 1 year (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-2.36) or with a reduction in mortality (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.68-1.71). Counseling about NSAID use was associated with a decrease in risk of 1-year rehospitalization for PUD (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22-0.99) and risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement program for elderly patients with PUD resulted in increased screening for H pylori and increased treatment of H pylori infection but no change in counseling about NSAID use. However, with the low prevalence of H pylori detected, treatment of H pylori infection was not associated with a reduction in repeat hospitalization for PUD or subsequent mortality, whereas counseling about the risks of using NSAIDs was associated with a reduction in the risk of both outcomes.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Úlcera Péptica/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Acta Biotheor ; 49(2): 125-40, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11450808

RESUMO

Biology incorporated into other disciplines is often distorted, alarmingly so in some areas of medicine. Together with other forms of bias, this may have detrimental effects for patients depending on medical research for their health. A case study concerning omeprazole (Losec), one of the acid-suppressive drugs against gastric ulcers, and NSAIDs, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, confirms that distorted biology together with biased health care policies foster disasters in current biomedicine and medical practice. In our country, The Netherlands, omeprazole is presumably the most commonly used medication. NSAIDs are also used in large quantities, increasingly since they have become available as analgesic over-the-counter drugs. Unofficial and official sources tend to inform the general public that the drugs promote human health. We argue that their being used on a massive scale is actually a medical disaster. The health of many patients would be served better if the drugs they take were replaced by proper forms of diet, but the pharmaceutical industry, the most potent force affecting medication policies, appears to prevent a shift in the balance from over-medicalization towards healthy life styles. The shift should come from government agencies responsible for regulation in the medication market. Policies of these agencies are now a dismal failure.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Dietoterapia , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Indústria Farmacêutica , Omeprazol/efeitos adversos , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/economia , Artrite Reumatoide/economia , Artrite Reumatoide/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício/tendências , Dietoterapia/economia , Aprovação de Drogas , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Humanos , Países Baixos , Omeprazol/economia , Úlcera Péptica/economia , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Lancet ; 356(9246): 1965-9, 2000 Dec 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11130524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia can be managed by initial endoscopy and treatment based on endoscopic findings, or by empirical prescribing. We aimed to determine the cost effectiveness of initial endoscopy compared with usual management in patients with dyspepsia over age 50 years presenting to their primary care physician. METHODS: 422 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to initial endoscopy or usual management. Primary outcomes were effect of treatment on dyspepsia symptoms and cost effectiveness. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and patient satisfaction. Total costs were calculated from individual patient's use of resources with unit costs applied from national data. Statistical analysis of uncertainty on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was done along with a sensitivity analysis on unit costs with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. FINDINGS: In the 12 months following recruitment, 213 (84%) patients had an endoscopy compared with 75 (41%) controls. Initial endoscopy resulted in a significant improvement in symptom score (p=0.03), and quality of life pain dimension (p=0.03), and a 48% reduction in the use of proton pump inhibitors (p=0.005). The ICER was Pound Sterling1728 (UK Pound Sterling) per patient symptom-free at 12 months. The ICER was very sensitive to the cost of endoscopy, and could be reduced to Pound Sterling165 if the unit cost of this procedure fell from Pound Sterling246 to Pound Sterling100. INTERPRETATION: Initial endoscopy in dyspeptic patients over age 50 might be a cost-effective intervention.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Dispepsia/terapia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Idoso , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Esofagite/diagnóstico , Esofagite/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastropatias/diagnóstico , Gastropatias/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 95(1): 106-13, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10638567

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine quality of care for hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: Collaborating with five Peer Review Organizations, we used 1995 Medicare claim files to select samples of inpatients with a principal diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Quality of care indicators developed by content experts included percentages for ulcer patients tested for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori); biopsied patients who received tissue tests; H. pylori-positive patients who received appropriate therapy; and ulcer patients screened for preadmission nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and counseled about risks. RESULTS: Of 2,644 patients eligible for medical record review, 56% were tested for H. pylori, and 73% of those testing positive were treated appropriately; 84% of patients with endoscopic biopsies received a tissue test for H. pylori; 74% of patients were screened for preadmission NSAID use, 24% had documented counseling of NSAID use, and only 2% had documented counseling on the ulcer risk of NSAID use. Statistically significant regional variation occurred in four of six quality indicators. Outpatient records were reviewed for 529 patients to document prior outpatient H. pylori in this population; only 2% (n = 12) were tested for H. pylori in the year before admission. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve quality of care by testing for and treating H. pylori in hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease and to improve screening for NSAIDs and counseling on ulcer risks.


Assuntos
Medicare , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Péptica/microbiologia , Estados Unidos
19.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 95(1): 264-70, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10638594

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe outcomes of care for Medicare patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer disease from 1992 through 1997 and to identify factors related to cost, length of stay, and readmission rates. METHODS: General descriptive statistics were obtained from Medicare inpatient claims data by year, endoscopy grouping, diagnosis related group code, and principal diagnosis code. From abstracted clinical data, associations were derived for length of stay, readmission rates, and the following processes of care: screening or treatment for Helicobacter pylori; screening for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use; and the performance of endoscopy. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation method was used to estimate patient health status for the study. RESULTS: During the 6-yr study, there were 878,212 claims, which constituted 1.3% of the total Medicare claims. The total Medicare payment for peptic ulcer claims was estimated at $4.8 billion. The inpatient mortality rate was 4.5%. Readmission rates remained relatively constant during the study period but decreased significantly when NSAID screening was documented during the hospitalization. Admission rates, length of stay, and mortality declined progressively during the study period. A reduction in length of stay of approximately 1 day was observed when screening or treatment for H. pylori, screening for NSAID use, or the performance of endoscopy was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Peptic ulcer disease has an important impact on the Medicare population with respect to cost, recurrence, and mortality. Adherence to selected processes of care is associated with shorter length of stay and lower readmission rates.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Medicare , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Úlcera Péptica/terapia , Idoso , Endoscopia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Readmissão do Paciente , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
20.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 9(2): 175-87, 1999 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10333437

RESUMO

The patient with acute variceal bleeding requires prompt attention and is best served by an organized approach to assessment and resuscitation. Knowledge of the differential diagnosis for acute bleeding from portal hypertension is essential. Special attention is needed during resuscitation regarding endotracheal intubation, intravenous resuscitation, and management of coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia. Carefully selected patients may be triaged into outpatient, overnight observation, routine inpatient, and intensive care settings.


Assuntos
Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Ressuscitação/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Úlcera Péptica/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA