Sensor-Based Measurement Method to Support the Assessment of Robot-Assisted Radiofrequency Ablation.

Digital surgery technologies, such as interventional robotics and sensor systems, not only improve patient care but also aid in the development and optimization of traditional invasive treatments and methods. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with critical clinical relevance today. Delayed intervention can lead to heart failure, stroke, or sudden cardiac death. Although many advances have been made in the field of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA), it can be further developed by incorporating sensor technology to improve its efficacy and safety. Automation can be utilized to shorten the duration of RF ablation, provided that the interactions between the tissue and the RF tools are well understood and adequately modeled. Further research is needed to develop the optimal catheter design. This paper describes the systematic methodology developed to support robot-assisted RF CA characterization measurements. The article describes the custom instruments developed for the experiments, particularly the contact force limiter, the measurement procedure, and the evaluation of the results, as enablers for new results. The aim was to establish an objective, repeatable, robust measurement method and adjacent procedure.

Directional microwave ablation in spine: experimental assessment of computational modeling.

BACKGROUND: Despite the theoretical advantages of treating metastatic bone disease with microwave ablation (MWA), there are few reports characterizing microwave absorption and bioheat transfer in bone. This report describes a computational modeling-based approach to simulate directional microwave ablation (dMWA) in spine, supported by ex vivo and pilot in vivo experiments in porcine vertebral bodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D computational model of microwave ablation within porcine vertebral bodies was developed. Ex vivo porcine vertebra experiments using a dMWA applicator measured temperatures approximately 10.1 mm radially from the applicator in the direction of MW radiation (T1) and approximately 2.4 mm in the contra-lateral direction (T2). Histologic assessment of ablated ex vivo tissue was conducted and experimental results compared to simulations. Pilot in vivo experiments in porcine vertebral bodies assessed ablation zones histologically and with CT and MRI. RESULTS: Experimental T1 and T2 temperatures were within 3-7% and 11-33% of simulated temperature values. Visible ablation zones, as indicated by grayed tissue, were smaller than those typical in other soft tissues. Posthumous MRI images of in vivo ablations showed hyperintensity. In vivo experiments illustrated the technical feasibility of creating directional microwave ablation zones in porcine vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Computational models and experimental studies illustrate the feasibility of controlled dMWA in bone tissue.

Comparison of safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with thermal ablation versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign thyroid nodules in a propensity-matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules (TNs) often require intervention due to symptomatic or cosmetic concerns. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown promise as a treatment option, offering potential advantages without neck scars. Recently, the scarless treatment alternative of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has emerged. When surgery can be performed in a scarless manner, it remains unclear whether ablation is still the preferred treatment choice. This study aims to compare the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction of RFA and TOETVA. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on patients treated with RFA or TOETVA for unilateral benign TNs between December 2016 and September 2021. Propensity score matching was employed to create comparable groups. Various clinicopathologic parameters, treatment outcomes, and costs were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 2814 nonfunctional thyroid nodules treated during this period, 642 were benign and unilateral. A total of 121 and 100 patients underwent thermal ablation and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy, respectively. After matching, 84 patients were selected for each group. Both RFA and TOETVA demonstrated low complication rates, with unique complications associated with each procedure. Treatment time (30.8±13.6 vs. 120.7±36.5 min, P <0.0001) was shorter in the RFA group. Patient satisfaction (significant improvement: 89.3% vs. 61.9%, P <0.0001) and cosmetic results (cosmetic score 1-2: 100.0% vs. 54.76%, P <0.0001) favored TOETVA. RFA was found to be less costly for a single treatment, but the cost of retreatment should be considered. The histological diagnoses post-TOETVA revealed malignancies in 9 out of 84 cases, underscoring the significance of follow-up assessments. CONCLUSION: Scarless procedures, RFA and TOETVA, are effective for treating unilateral benign TNs, each with unique advantages and drawbacks. While RFA is cheaper for a single treatment, TOETVA offers superior cosmetic results and patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term safety and cost-effectiveness. It is crucial to remain vigilant about the possibility of malignancy despite benign cytology pre-treatment.

Editor's Choice - Short Term Cost Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation and High Ligation and Stripping for Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence.

OBJECTIVE: Superficial venous incompetence (SVI) is a common disease that causes significant quality of life (QoL) impairment. There is a need for more health economic evaluations of SVI treatment. The aim of this study was to perform a cost effectiveness analysis in patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high ligation and stripping (HL/S), and no treatment or conservative treatment with one year follow up. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial economic analysis from an ongoing trial; 143 patients (156 limbs) with GSV incompetence (CEAP clinical class 2 - 6) were included. Treatment was performed with RFA or HL/S. Follow up was performed up to one year using duplex ultrasound, revised venous clinical severity score (r-VCSS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L). RESULTS: Seventy-eight limbs were treated with RFA and HL/S respectively. No treatment or conservative treatment was assumed to have zero in treatment cost and no treatment benefit. In the RFA group, one limb had reflux in the GSV after one month and three limbs after one year. In HL/S, two limbs had remaining reflux in the treated area at one month and one year. Both disease severity (r-VCSS, p = .004) and QoL (AVVQ, p = .021 and EQ-5D-3L, p = .028) were significantly improved over time. The QALY gain was 0.21 for RFA and 0.17 for HL/S. The cost per patient was calculated as €1 292 for RFA and €2 303 for HL/S. The cost per QALY (compared with no treatment or conservative treatment) was €6 155 for RFA and €13 549 for HL/S. With added cost for days absent from work the cost per QALY was €7 358 for RFA and €24 197 for HL/S. The cost per QALY for both methods was well below the threshold suggested by Swedish National Board of Health. CONCLUSION: RFA is more cost effective than HL/S and no treatment or conservative treatment at one year follow up.

A Comparison of Venaseal Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Outcomes Within a Managed Care Organization.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency is a common medical condition that afflicts over 30 million adults in the United States. Treatment and management have changed dramatically over the past 20 years with the introduction of various endovenous therapies, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cyanoacrylate closure using the Venaseal system. In this study, we explore a direct comparison of outcomes between RFA and VenaSeal conducted by a single surgeon within a managed care organization. METHODS: Between May 2020 and December 2021, there were 87 patients undergoing 97 total procedures who were treated with either VenaSeal (n = 55) or RFA (n = 42), conducted by a single surgeon within a managed care organization. Primary outcomes included successful greater saphenous vein (GSV) closure, postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), embolization, saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) thrombosis, skin reaction (allergic or thrombophlebitis), or procedure-related emergency room (ER) and urgent care (UC) visits. Retrospective chart review was conducted to describe patient demographics, indications for treatment, treatment details (number of access sites and indication for treatment), as well as follow-up adjunctive vein procedures (sclerotherapy and stab phlebectomy). RESULTS: All patients had postprocedural ultrasound (US) performed within 7 days by the operating surgeon and mean overall patient follow-up from index procedure was 12 months; 2 patients were lost to follow-up due to death. All operations utilized intraoperative US, and SFJ thrombosis was not observed in any patient postprocedure. The average age of VenaSeal and RFA groups was 59.05 and 59.51 years, respectively. The average number of access sites during the procedure for VenaSeal and RFA was 1.56 and 1.20, respectively. Of the 55 VenaSeal treatments, 9.1% of patients reported postoperative skin reactions, and 9.1% of patients underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy (22 stabs on average). Of the 42 RFA treatments, 7.1% of RFA patients reported postoperative skin reactions, and 9.5% underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy (36 stabs on average). The percentage of patients who had postoperative UC or emergency department visits related to the procedure in the VenaSeal and RFA groups was 3.6% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both VenaSeal and RFA demonstrated effective vein closure of the GSV at 12-month follow-up, with VenaSeal demonstrating continued noninferiority to RFA. Based on our data, postoperative skin reactions do not appear to be significantly higher with VenaSeal treatment, as previously reported.

Age-stratified comparison of active surveillance versus radiofrequency ablation for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma using decision analysis.

BACKGROUND: Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas may be treated with radiofrequency ablation, active surveillance, or surgery. The objective of this study was to use mathematical modeling to compare treatment alternatives for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas among those who decline surgery. We hypothesized that radiofrequency ablation would outperform active surveillance in avoiding progression and surgery but that the effect size would be small for older patients. METHODS: We engaged stakeholders to identify meaningful long-term endpoints for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma treatment-(1) cancer progression/surgery, (2) need for thyroid replacement therapy, and (3) permanent treatment complication. A Markov decision analysis model was created to compare the probability of these endpoints after radiofrequency ablation or active surveillance for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas and overall cost. Transition probabilities were extracted from published literature. Model outcomes were estimated to have a 10-year time horizon. RESULTS: The primary outcome yielded a number needed to treat of 18.1 for the avoidance of progression and 27.4 for the avoidance of lifelong thyroid replacement therapy for radiofrequency ablation compared to active surveillance. However, as patient age increased, the number needed to treat to avoid progression increased from 5.2 (age 20-29) to 39.1 (age 60+). The number needed to treat to avoid lifelong thyroid replacement therapy increased with age from 7.8 (age 20-29) to 59.3 (age 60+). The average 10-year cost/treatment for active surveillance and radiofrequency ablation were $6,400 and $11,700, respectively, translating to a cost per progression-avoided of $106,500. CONCLUSION: As an alternative to active surveillance, radiofrequency ablation may have a greater therapeutic impact in younger patients. However, routine implementation may be cost-prohibitive for most patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinomas.

Clinical and economic outcomes of a systematic same-day discharge programme after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison between cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation.

AIMS: Same-day discharge (SDD) is feasible after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aim to compare prospectively cryoballoon (CRYO) vs. radiofrequency (RF) ablation in a systematic SDD programme. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively analysed the 617 scheduled PVI performed consecutively at our institution (n = 377 CRYO, n = 240 RF) from 1 April 2019 to 31 December 2022 within a systematic programme of SDD. The feasibility of SDD, the 10-day incidence of urgent/unplanned medical care after discharge (UUC-10), and the cost per procedure due to hospital resource use were studied. The 100 procedures performed during the previous year, in which patients were systematically hospitalized, were used as a control group. Same-day discharge was achieved in 585/617 (95%) procedures, with a significant trend towards a higher monthly SDD rate from 2019 to 2022 (P = 0.03). The frequency of SDD was similar in CRYO (356/377; 94%) vs. RF (229/240; 95%). After SDD, the UUC-10 was 66/585 (11.3%), being similar for CRYO (41/356; 11.5%) and RF (25/229; 10.9%); P = 0.8 (log-rank test). Of these, 10 patients were re-hospitalized, with an identical rate in CRYO-treated (6/356; 1.7%) and RF-treated (4/229; 1.7%) patients and owing to similar causes (4 haematomas, 4 pericarditis, and 2 symptomatic sinus node dysfunction). Same-day discharge was associated with an average savings per procedure of 63% (P < 0.001), but no differences were found between the CRYO and RF (P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: In a systematic SDD programme, feasibility (95%, increasing over time), safety (11% UUC-10, 1.7% re-hospitalizations), and savings (63% per procedure) were similar for CRYO and RF ablation procedures.

Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Comparison of Thyroid Lobectomy and Radiofrequency Ablation.

OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules has gained traction for its therapeutic effectiveness, thyroid function preservation, and minimally invasive nature. While a growing body of evidence reports positive outcomes from thyroid RFA, financial comparisons between both procedures remain limited. This analysis aims to more accurately measure the direct cost of thyroid RFA in comparison to thyroid lobectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Bottom-up financial cost analysis. SETTING: Tertiary endocrine head and neck surgery center. METHODS: Time-driven activity-based costing was utilized to obtain unit-based cost estimates. The care cycles for thyroid lobectomy and RFA were defined, and process maps were developed comprising all personnel and work in the care cycle. Time estimates were calculated for all personnel involved, and public government data were used to obtain capacity cost rates for each component of the care cycle. Consumable supply and overhead costs were obtained for both procedures, and overall costs were compared. RESULTS: For thyroid lobectomy, total personnel costs were $1087.97, consumable supplies were $942.68, and overhead costs $17,199.10. For thyroid nodule RFA performed in an office setting, the total personnel cost calculated was $379.90, consumable supplies $1315.28, and overhead $7031.20. Overall, the total cost for thyroid lobectomy was $19,229.75 compared to $8726.38 for RFA. CONCLUSION: In-office thyroid nodule RFA is associated with lower direct costs than thyroid lobectomy, and overhead is the greatest cost driver for both procedures. If clinical and patient-centered outcomes are comparable, then RFA may provide higher value for appropriately selected patients.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Barrett Esophagus and High-grade Dysplasia or Low-grade Dysplasia.

PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines recommend radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for eradication of Barrett esophagus in patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), but evidence on whether RFA provides good value for money is still sparse. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of RFA in Italy. METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate lifelong costs and consequences of disease progression with different treatments. RFA was compared with esophagectomy in the HGD group or endoscopic surveillance in the LGD group. Clinical and quality-of-life parameters were derived from a review of the literature and expert opinions, whereas Italian national tariffs were used as a proxy for costs. FINDINGS: RFA dominated esophagectomy in patients with HGD with a probability of 83%. For patients with LGD, RFA was more effective and more costly than active surveillance (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, €6276 per quality-adjusted life-year). At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €15,272, the probability of RFA being the optimal strategy in this population was close to 100%. Model results were sensitive to the cost of the interventions and utility weights used in the different disease states. IMPLICATIONS: RFA is likely to be the optimal choice for patients with LGD and HGD in Italy. Italy is discussing the implementation of a national program for the health technology assessment of medical devices, requiring more studies to prove value for money of emerging technologies.

An in silico assessment on the potential of using saline infusion to overcome non-confluent coagulation zone during two-probe, no-touch bipolar radiofrequency ablation of liver cancer.

No-touch bipolar radiofrequency ablation (bRFA) is known to produce incomplete tumour ablation with a 'butterfly-shaped' coagulation zone when the interelectrode distance exceeds a certain threshold. Although non-confluent coagulation zone can be avoided by not implementing the no-touch mode, doing so exposes the patient to the risk of tumour track seeding. The present study investigates if prior infusion of saline into the tissue can overcome the issues of non-confluent or butterfly-shaped coagulation. A computational modelling approach based on the finite element method was carried out. A two-compartment model comprising the tumour that is surrounded by healthy liver tissue was developed. Three cases were considered; i) saline infusion into the tumour centre; ii) one-sided saline infusion outside the tumour; and iii) two-sided saline infusion outside the tumour. For each case, three different saline volumes were considered, i.e. 6, 14 and 22 ml. Saline concentration was set to 15% w/v. Numerical results showed that saline infusion into the tumour centre can overcome the butterfly-shaped coagulation only if the infusion volume is sufficient. On the other hand, one-sided infusion outside the tumour did not overcome this. Two-sided infusion outside the tumour produced confluent coagulation zone with the largest volume. Results obtained from the present study suggest that saline infusion, when carried out correctly, can be used to effectively eradicate liver cancer. This presents a practical solution to address non-confluent coagulation zone typical of that during two-probe bRFA treatment.

PV Isolation Using a Spherical Array PFA Catheter: Preclinical Assessment and Comparison to Radiofrequency Ablation.

BACKGROUND: A multielectrode spherical array catheter capable of single-shot mapping and ablation has been introduced. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of circumferential, linear, and focal ablation using either microsecond pulsed field (PF) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in preclinical model. METHODS: Under general anesthesia, a 122 gold-plated multielectrode array was introduced into the left atrium. Twenty-nine canines underwent isolation of two pulmonary veins (PVs), with linear and focal left atrial ablation with both RF (n = 12) and PF (n = 17). PF was also delivered within the superior vena cava and atop the esophagus in three swine. Animals were sacrificed acutely (immediately for RF [6 of 12] and 3 days for PF [6 of 17]) and the remaining (n = 17) at 14 to 30 days. Detailed necropsy and histopathology were performed. RESULTS: All PVs were acutely (58 of 58) and durably (34 of 34) isolated and exhibited wide confluent lesions. Lesions were transmural for 97% to 100% of sections with depths of 2.5 to 3.4 mm and 2.5 to 3.5 mm in the acute and chronic cohorts, respectively. Linear and focal lesions displayed transmurality rates of 85% to 100% with depths of 3.5 millimeters to 4.2 millimeters in the acute cohort. In the chronic cohorts, linear lesions created with RF, PF+RF, and PF had no significant differences in depth (3.5 ± 1.8 mm, 4.0 ± 1.4 mm, and 3.9 ± 0.9 mm) or transmurality (83.3%, 100%, and 80%). Current of injury was seen on local unipolar electrogram immediately after PF and RF, and this occurred to a wider extent with PF. PF but not RF elicited bradycardia from ganglionated plexi stimulation. There were no instances of phrenic palsy, venous stenosis, esophageal damage, or thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential, linear, and focal mapping and ablation can be achieved with this novel catheter using both PF and RF, with excellent efficacy and safety.

Cost Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Adrenal Adenoma in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism and Hypertension: Results from the ADERADHTA Pilot Study and Comparison with Surgical Adrenalectomy.

PURPOSE: Primary Aldosteronism (PA) is increasingly considered as a common disease affecting up to 10% of the hypertensive population. Standard of care comprises laparoscopic total adrenalectomy but innovative treatment such as RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) constitutes an emerging promising alternative to surgery. The main aim of this study is to analyse the cost of RFA versus surgery on aldosterone-producing adenoma patient from the French National Health Insurance (FNHI) perspective. METHODS: The ADERADHTA study was a prospective pilot study aiming to evaluate both safety and efficacy of the novel use of adrenal RFA on the patients with PA. This study conducted on two French sites and enrolled adult patients, between 2016 and 2018, presenting hypertension and underwent the RFA procedure. Direct medical (inpatient and outpatient) and non-medical (transportation, daily allowance) costs were calculated over a 6-month follow-up period. Moreover, the procedure costs for the RFA were calculated from the hospital perspective. Descriptive statistics were implemented. RESULTS: Analysis was done on 21 patients in RFA groups and 27 patients in the surgery group. The difference in hospital costs between the RFA and surgery groups was €3774 (RFA: €1923; Surgery: €5697 p < 0.001) in favour of RFA. Inpatient and outpatient costs over the 6-month follow-up period were estimated at €3,48 for patients who underwent RFA. The production cost of implementing the RFA procedure was estimated at €1539 from the hospital perspective. CONCLUSION: Our study was the first to show that RFA is 2 to 3 times less costly than surgery. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT02756754.

Protocol for the ORION trial (RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoids are common and can significantly impact the personal and working lives of individuals. Those with more severe symptoms and those not responding to conservative management may require surgery. Current surgical techniques are associated with a degree of postoperative discomfort which may delay return to normal activity. Recurrence is lower in more radical procedures but resulting pain is higher. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a new technique that is gaining popularity and has several hypothesised benefits, including reduced pain and recurrence. However, available evidence is limited. A recent overview from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommended more research, in the form of randomised controlled trials, be carried out before further investment is made by national health services. Our aim is to assess whether RFA is at least as good in terms of recurrence as existing surgical interventions, but superior in terms of pain, for patients with symptomatic grade II and III haemorrhoids. METHODS: The RadiO fRequency ablatION for haemorrhoids (ORION) trial will be a pragmatic multicentre patient/assessor-blind parallel group-controlled trial with economic evaluation. The target sample size is 376 participants (188 per arm) and is based on two co-primary endpoints: (i) a non-inferiority design for recurrence and (ii) superiority design for pain at seven days. Participants with grade II or III haemorrhoids will be recruited in 16 National Health Service hospitals and randomised (1:1) to either RFA or surgeon's choice of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Results will inform future practice for the treatment of grade II-III haemorrhoids and provide evidence for national health services on future investments in RFA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14474552.

Cirugía por radiofrecuencia una alternativa terapéutica en la Insuficiencia Venosa Crónica / Radiofrequency surgery a therapeutic alternative in Chronic Venous Insufficiency / Cirurgia de Radiofrequência uma alternativa terapêutica na Insuficiência Venosa Crônica

La insuficiencia venosa crónica es una patología caracterizada por dificultar el retorno venoso hacia el corazón, se estima que el 90% de la población, padecerá de esta patología en algún momento de la vida, no obstante, su impacto toca la esfera socioeconómica, laboral e inclusive estética del paciente. Clínicamente se manifiesta con telangiectasias, venas varicosas e inclusive úlceras venosas por estasis, el cuadro se acompaña de dolor, cansancio, sensación de pesadez a nivel de miembros inferiores. Objetivo. Establecer los beneficios de la ablación por radiofrecuencia en el tratamiento de la insuficiencia venosa crónica estadificada de acuerdo con la CEAP (Clasificación clínica, etiológica, anatómica, fisiopatológica) en el Hospital Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social en la ciudad de Riobamba, en el período 2018-2020. Materiales y Métodos. Se presenta un estudio retrospectivo de corte transversal, realizado en 75 pacientes intervenidos con radiofrecuencia en el Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social (IESS) Riobamba, en el período 2018-2020 quienes voluntariamente decidieron participar en el estudio. Resultados. Se obtuvo que esta patología se presenta en un 68% en el sexo femenino y en un 32% en el sexo masculino, de la población total el 60% presentó sobrepeso y el 40% presentó obesidad, mediante la clasificación CEAP se categorizó en C3 al 58.7 % seguido de C2 al 32%, los pacientes de esta última categoría mostraron mejoría dentro de los 6 meses posteriores a la intervención. Conclusiones. La ablación por radiofrecuencia es una técnica quirúrgica efectiva en el tratamiento de los troncos safenos insuficientes, con excelentes resultados postquirúrgicos y en la calidad de vida del paciente.

Chronic venous insufficiency is a pathology characterized by hindering venous return to the heart, it is estimated that 90% of the population will suffer from this pathology at some point in life, however, its impact touches the socioeconomic, labor and even aesthetic sphere of the patient. Clinically it manifests with telangiectasias, varicose veins and even venous stasis ulcers, the picture is accompanied by pain, fatigue, feeling of heaviness in the lower limbs. Objective. To establish the benefits of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency staged according to the CEAP (Clinical, etiological, anatomical, pathophysiological classification) in the Hospital Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social in the city of Riobamba, in the period 2018-2020. Materials and Methods. A retrospective cross-sectional study is presented, performed in 75 patients intervened with radiofrequency at the Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social (IESS) Riobamba, in the period 2018-2020 who voluntarily decided to participate in the study. Results. It was obtained that this pathology is presented in 68% in the female sex and 32% in the male sex, of the total population 60% presented overweight and 40% presented obesity, by CEAP classification was categorized in C3 to 58.7% followed by C2 to 32%, the patients of this last category showed improvement within 6 months after the intervention. Conclusions. Radiofrequency ablation is an effective surgical technique in the treatment of insufficient saphenous trunks, with excellent post-surgical results and in the patient's quality of life.

A insuficiência venosa crônica é uma patologia caracterizada pela dificuldade de retorno venoso ao coração. Estima-se que 90% da população sofrerá desta patologia em algum momento de suas vidas; entretanto, seu impacto afeta a esfera sócio-econômica, ocupacional e até estética do paciente. Clinicamente, manifesta-se com telangiectasias, varizes e até mesmo úlceras de estase venosa, acompanhadas de dor, cansaço e uma sensação de peso nos membros inferiores. Objetivo. Estabelecer os benefícios da ablação por radiofreqüência no tratamento da insuficiência venosa crônica encenada de acordo com a CEAP (classificação clínica, etiológica, anatômica, fisiopatológica) no Hospital Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social na cidade de Riobamba, no período de 2018-2020. Materiais e métodos. É apresentado um estudo transversal retrospectivo, realizado em 75 pacientes que intervieram com radiofreqüência no Instituto Equatoriano de Seguridade Social (IESS) Riobamba, no período de 2018-2020, que voluntariamente decidiram participar do estudo. Resultados. Obteve-se que esta patologia ocorre em 68% no sexo feminino e 32% no sexo masculino, da população total 60% apresentava sobrepeso e 40% apresentava obesidade, pela classificação CEAP foi categorizada em C3 a 58,7% seguido por C2 a 32%, os pacientes desta última categoria apresentaram melhora em 6 meses após a intervenção. Conclusões. A ablação por radiofrequência é uma técnica cirúrgica eficaz no tratamento de troncos de safena insuficientes, com excelentes resultados pós-cirúrgicos e na qualidade de vida do paciente.

Three-dimensional assessment of vascular cooling effects on hepatic microwave ablation in a standardized ex vivo model.

The aim of this study was a three-dimensional analysis of vascular cooling effects on microwave ablation (MWA) in an ex vivo porcine model. A glass tube, placed in parallel to the microwave antenna at distances of 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mm (A-V distance), simulated a natural liver vessel. Seven flow rates (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 100, 500 ml/min) were evaluated. Ablations were segmented into 2 mm slices for a 3D-reconstruction. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed. 126 experiments were carried out. Cooling effects occurred in all test series with flow rates ≥ 2 ml/min in the ablation periphery. These cooling effects had no impact on the total ablation volume (p > 0.05) but led to changes in ablation shape at A-V distances of 5.0 mm and 10.0 mm. Contrary, at a A-V distance of 2.5 mm only flow rates of ≥ 10 ml/min led to relevant cooling effects in the ablation centre. These cooling effects influenced the ablation shape, whereas the total ablation volume was reduced only at a maximal flow rate of 500 ml/min (p = 0.002). Relevant cooling effects exist in MWA. They mainly depend on the distance of the vessel to the ablation centre.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis compared with intra-articular hyaluronan injections based on trial data.

BACKGROUND: Effective symptom control in painful knee osteoarthritis (OA) may improve patient quality of life. In a randomised crossover trial (NCT03381248), COOLIEF* cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) reduced pain and stiffness and improved physical function and quality of life compared with intra-articular hyaluronan (HA) injections. The present study aimed to establish the cost effectiveness of CRFA versus intra-articular HA injections for treating moderate-to-severe OA knee pain from a US Medicare perspective. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using utility data (EQ-5D) from the randomised crossover trial of CRFA versus intra-articular HA injections, which had follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients in the HA group with unsatisfactory outcomes (e.g., continued pain) at 6 months could cross over to CRFA. Economic analysis outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and cost effectiveness (cost per QALY gained). Base-case analyses were modelled on a 6-month time horizon (to trial crossover). Due to limited trial data in the HA arm beyond 6 months, scenarios explored potential outcomes to 12 months if: 1) Utility with HA persisted for a further 6 months; 2) A second HA injection was received at 6 months and achieved the same utility change for the second 6 months. In both scenarios, the CRFA arm used trial data for patients who received CRFA from baseline to 12 months. Alternative costing scenarios were also explored. RESULTS: CRFA resulted in an incremental QALY gain of 0.020 at an incremental cost of US$1707, equating to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$84,392 per QALY over 6 months, versus intra-articular HA injections. Extending the analysis to 12 months and assuming persistence in utility in the HA arm resulted in a larger utility gain for CRFA (0.056 QALYs) and a lower ICER of US$30,275 per QALY. If patients received a second HA injection, the incremental benefit of CRFA out to 12 months was reduced (QALY gain 0.043) but was offset by the costs of the second HA injection (incremental cost US$832). This resulted in an ICER of US$19,316 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: CRFA is a cost-effective treatment option for patients with OA-related knee pain considering the typical US threshold of US$100,000/QALY.

Insurance lesions: Does a second lesion make a difference?

INTRODUCTION: In radiofrequency ablation procedures for cardiac arrhythmia, the efficacy of creating repeated lesions at the same location ("insurance lesions") remains poorly studied. We assessed the effect of type of tissue, power, and time on the resulting lesion geometry during such multiple ablation procedures. METHODS: A custom ex vivo ablation model was used to assess lesion formation. An ablation catheter was oriented perpendicular to the tissue and used to create lesions that varied by type of tissue (atrial or ventricular free wall), power (30 or 50 W), and time (30, 40, or 50 s for standard ablations and 5, 10, or 15 s for high-power, short-duration [HPSD] ablations). Lesion dimensions were recorded and then analyzed. Radiofrequency ablations were performed on 57 atrial tissue samples (28 HPSD, 29 standard) and 28 ventricular tissue samples (all standard). RESULTS: With ablation parameters held constant, performing multiple ablations significantly increased lesion depth in ventricular tissue when ablations were performed at 30 W for 50 s. No other set of ablation parameters was shown to affect the width or depth of the resulting lesions in either tissue type. CONCLUSION: Multiple ablations created with the same power and time, delivered within 30 s of each other at the same exact location, offer no meaningful benefit in lesion depth or width over single ablations, with the exception of ventricular ablation at 30 W for 50 s. Given the risks associated with excessive ablation, our results suggest that this practice should be re-evaluated by clinical electrophysiologists.

Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Early Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the non-surgical management of early stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) criteria in the Canadian healthcare system. METHODS: A Markov state transition model was constructed for initial local treatment with RFA or SBRT for early stage, kidney confined, medically inoperable RCC in a hypothetical cohort. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) were then calculated to compare the two treatments. The analysis was conducted over 5-year time horizon from the perspective of a publicly funded health system in Canada. Secondary analyses were conducted to assess the effect of small versus large size (< 4 cm vs. > 4 cm) RCC on ICERs. Multiple one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis were conducted. Discounting of 1.5% per year was applied. RESULTS: Over 5 years, SBRT economically dominated RFA with a gain of 4.103 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and a cost of $16,097, compared with 3.607 QALYs at a cost of $18,324 for RFA. The ICER was $4490 CAD less per QALY for SBRT in the base case analysis (BCE). In patients with small tumors (T1a), SBRT compared with RFA was more effective and marginally more costly, resulting in an ICER of $2207 CAD per QALY gained, while for larger tumors (T1b), SBRT was less costly and more effective than RFA, resulting in an ICER of -$22904. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated significant variability in the cost-effectiveness of SBRT versus RFA when parameters were varied, with rates of distant metastasis following RFA or SBRT having the greatest implications on ICERs. CONCLUSION: Overall, SBRT used as a primary treatment for RCC shows promising effectiveness at an overall reduction in cost compared with RFA in the Canadian healthcare system. The use of SBRT appears to be cost-effective for larger tumors as well as smaller tumors. The validity of these conclusions are highly sensitive to the accuracy of local and distant progression rates reported in previous studies, and may be adjusted as the available data on SBRT and RFA continues to evolve and mature.

Economic effect between surgery and thermal ablation for patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: At present, there are still many controversies regarding the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). It is worth noting that thermal ablation has become a viable alternative for patients at high risk of surgery or those who wish to receive more active treatment than active surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the economic benefits, efficacy, and safety of thermal ablation for patients with PTMC. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for articles published from the database establishment to August 2021. All of the studies included were retrospective cohort analyses. In addition, meta-analysis was performed using the Stata15.1 versions and Review Manager5.3. Data were extracted according to the PRISMA guidelines by two professional doctors. RESULTS: A total of 7 articles (1582 patients) were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. We discovered that thermal ablation could shorten the hospitalization time (SMD, -3.82[95%CI, -5.25 to -2.40]), operation time (SMD, -5.67[95%CI, -6.65 to -4.68]), cost (SMD, -3.40 [95%CI, -5.06 to -1.75]) and reduce postoperative complications (OR, 0.07 [95%CI, 0.01 to 0.44]) than surgical treatment. In addition, our study also found that compared with surgery, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.63 to 3.73]) and metastasis rate (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.12 to 1.86]). CONCLUSION: On the premise of being safe and effective, thermal ablation has better economic benefits than surgical treatment for patients with PTMC.