Formulation of Saxagliptin Oral Films: Optimization, Physicochemical Characterization, In-Vivo Assessment, and In-Vitro Real-Time Release Monitoring via a Novel Polyaniline Nanoparticles-Based Solid-Contact Screen Printed Ion-Selective Electrode.

Oral dispersible films have received broad interest due to fast drug absorption and no first-path metabolism, leading to high bioavailability and better patient compliance. Saxagliptin (SXG) is an antidiabetic drug that undergoes first-path metabolism, resulting in a less active metabolite, so the development of SXG oral dispersible films (SXG-ODFs) improves SXG bioavailability. The formula optimisation included a response surface experimental design and the impact of three formulation factors, the type and concentration of polymer and plasticiser concentration on in-vitro disintegration time and folding endurance. Two optimised SXG-ODFs prepared using either polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose were investigated. SXG-ODFs prepared with PVA demonstrated a superior rapid disintegration time, ranging from 17 to 890 s, with the fastest disintegration time recorded at 17 s. These short durations can be attributed to the hydrophilic nature of PVA, facilitating rapid hydration and disintegration upon contact with saliva. Additionally, PVA-based films displayed remarkable folding endurance, surpassing 200 folds without rupture, indicating flexibility and stability. The high tensile strength of PVA-based films further underscores their robust mechanical properties, with tensile strength values reaching up to 4.53 MPa. SXG exhibits a UV absorption wavelength of around 212 nm, posing challenges for traditional quantitative spectrophotometric analysis, so a polyaniline nanoparticles-based solid-contact screen-printed ion-selective electrode (SP-ISE) was employed for the determination of SXG release profile effectively in comparison to HPLC. SP-ISE showed a better real-time release profile of SXG-ODFs, and the optimised formula showed lower blood glucose levels than commercial tablets.

Cost-Effectiveness of Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 Inhibitors Added to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China.

Purpose: Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, including linagliptin, alogliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin, are used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in China. This study assessed the economic outcomes of different DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin in the Chinese context. Materials and Methods: In this study, the validated Chinese Outcomes Model for T2DM (COMT) was conducted to project economic outcomes from the perspective of Chinese healthcare service providers. Efficacy and safety, medical expenditure, and utility data were derived from the literature, which were assigned to model variables. The primary outputs of the model included the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probability sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the potential uncertainties of parameters. Results: Of the five competing strategies, alogliptin 25 mg strategy yielded the most significant health outcome, which associated with improvements in discounted QALY of 0.007, 0.014, 0.011, and 0.022 versus linagliptin 5 mg, saxagliptin 5 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg and vildagliptin50 mg, respectively. The sitagliptin 100 mg strategy was the cheapest option. The ICER of alogliptin 25 mg against sitagliptin 100 mg strategy was $6,952 per additional QALY gained, and the rest of the strategies were dominated or extended dominated. The most influential parameters were the cost of DPP-4 inhibitors and their treatment efficacy. Conclusions: These results suggested that alogliptin was a preferred treatment option compared with other DPP-4 inhibitors for Chinese patients whose T2DM are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin Versus Saxagliptin Treatment as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy as Add-on to Metformin for Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term cost effectiveness of dapagliflozin (DAPA) and saxagliptin (SAXA) separately or together in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled by metformin (MET). METHODS: Five head-to-head randomised controlled trials of the efficacy of DAPA and SAXA in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients were found by searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from inception to October 2019. The lifetime disease progression and long-term effectiveness of therapy in patients were projected by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcome Model 2 (UKPDS OM2) in three T2DM therapeutic groups: DAPA + SAXA, DAPA and SAXA. Each group used DAPA and/or SAXA as an add-on therapy to MET. The study took the perspective of Chinese healthcare service providers. Univariate, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) value of the DAPA + SAXA, SAXA and DAPA groups were 11.28, 11.26 and 11.45 years, respectively. The total costs were US$27,954.84, US$23,254.46 and US$25,608.49, respectively. DAPA was dominant over DAPA + SAXA. The DAPA + SAXA group presented an estimated QALY gain of 0.02 and a total cost increase of US$4700.39 over the SAXA group, with an incremental cost of US$217,530.10 per QALY. Compared with the SAXA group, the DAPA group had a QALY gain of 0.19 years and a total cost increase of US$2354.04, for an incremental cost of US$12,191.97 per QALY. The pharmacoeconomic results were robust to univariate, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DAPA + SAXA or SAXA, DAPA appears to be a cost-effective therapy as add-on to MET for Chinese patients whose T2DM is insufficiently controlled by MET.

[Efficacy of Saxagliptin for Blood Glucose Control in Hemodialysis Patients with Diabetes].

Studies on the drug saxagliptin (marketed in Japan since 2013) suggest favorable efficacy in hemodialysis patients, but included small sample sizes. Noting that some hemodialysis patients at our medical institution had been switched to saxagliptin 2.5 mg from treatment with other dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, we decided to evaluate the effects of switching to saxagliptin on blood glucose control in these patients. The study included 11 patients. Before switching drugs, six of the patients used teneligliptin 20 mg and five used linagliptin 5 mg. Mean glycated albumin (GA) from before to 4 months after switching tended to increase in the previous users of teneligliptin 20 mg (18.4±3.0% to 19.5±2.7%) and tended to decrease in the previous users of linagliptin 5 mg (18.8±3.3% to 17.7±1.4%). Lack of a substantial change in GA when the previous users of teneligliptin 20 mg and linagliptin 5 mg were switched to saxagliptin 2.5 mg indicates that these three agents might have comparable antihyperglycemic profiles when used in patients on hemodialysis. Future research following from this pilot study must evaluate the risk of cardiac failure and incidences of adverse events in a larger population, to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of switching to saxagliptin.

Role of endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 enhanced by vildagliptin in the glycaemic and energy expenditure responses to intraduodenal fat infusion in type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin on glycaemic and energy expenditure responses during intraduodenal fat infusion, as well as the contribution of endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) signalling, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 15 people with T2DM managed by diet and/or metformin (glycated haemoglobin 49.3 ± 2.1 mmol/mol) were studied on three occasions (two with vildagliptin and one with placebo) in a double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion. On each day, vildagliptin 50 mg or placebo was given orally, followed by intravenous exendin (9-39) 600 pmol/kg/min, on one of the two vildagliptin treatment days, or 0.9% saline over 180 minutes. At between 0 and 120 minutes, a fat emulsion was infused intraduodenally at 2 kcal/min. Energy expenditure, plasma glucose and glucose-regulatory hormones were evaluated. RESULTS: Intraduodenal fat increased plasma GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), insulin and glucagon, and energy expenditure, and decreased plasma glucose (all P < 0.05). On the two intravenous saline days, plasma glucose and glucagon were lower, plasma intact GLP-1 was higher (all P < 0.05), and energy expenditure tended to be lower after vildagliptin (P = 0.08) than placebo. On the two vildagliptin days, plasma glucose, glucagon and GLP-1 (both total and intact), and energy expenditure were higher during intravenous exendin (9-39) than saline (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In well-controlled T2DM during intraduodenal fat infusion, vildagliptin lowered plasma glucose and glucagon, and tended to decrease energy expenditure, effects that were mediated by endogenous GLP-1.

Novel univariate spectrophotometric determination of the recently released solid dosage form comprising dapagliflozin and saxagliptin via factorized response spectra: Assessment of the average content and dosage unit uniformity of tablets.

Dapagliflozin (DPF) and saxagliptin (SXG) are currently co-formulated in a tablet dosage form which is prescribed to improve glycemic control. The absorption spectra of DPF and SXG were highly overlapped which completely hindered their simultaneous estimation at their λmax 224 nm and 209 nm, respectively. Thus, in this work three smart and simple univariate spectrophotometric methods were originally established and validated for the first time in order to quantitatively estimate DPF and SXG in bulk forms and in combined pharmaceutical formulation without the requirement for any initial separation or treatment. These methods are; factorized zero order method (FZM), factorized derivative method (FDM) and factorized ratio difference method (FRM). These methods were capable of determining DPF and SXG over the range of 2.5-50.0 µg/mL and 2.5-60.0 µg/mL, respectively. All the developed methods are based on a novel and unique approach for the spectral recovery of unresolved spectra named; factorized response spectrum (FRS). The exclusivity of the FRS originates from its ability to completely resolve the cited drugs in the mixture and retrieve their original spectra. Selectivity of all proposed methods was assessed by comparing the obtained results of the mixture analysis with those of the pure powdered drugs. Validation of the newly developed methods was applied as recommended by the ICH demonstrating acceptable accuracy and precision. In general, these methods could be effectively employed for the routine quality control investigation of bulk materials and available market formulations.

Comparative Assessment of the Effectiveness of Noncompetitive NMDA Receptor Antagonists Amantadine and Hemantane in Morphine Withdrawal Syndrome Model.

Activities of noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists (aminoadamantane derivatives) were assessed in random-bred rats with modeled morphine withdrawal syndrome. A single intraperitoneal injection of hemantane (10 or 20 mg/kg) significantly and dose-dependently moderated some behavioral symptoms (teeth-chattering, ptosis, and vocalization) and reduced total score of morphine withdrawal syndrome. In morphine-abstinent rats, hemantane partially prevented the decrease in the thresholds of tactile sensitivity, but had no effect on locomotor activity and body weight loss. Under conditions of morphine withdrawal, intraperitoneal injection of amantadine (10 or 20 mg/kg) decreased motor activity and promoted body weight loss in parallel with the development of mechanical allodynia, but had no effect on the total withdrawal score. Comparison of aminoadamantane derivatives by behavioral and physiological parameters demonstrated the advantage of hemantane during morphine abstinence indicating the need of its study as a promising anti-addiction remedy.

[Assessment of the antiviral activity of 2HCl*H-His-Rim compound compared to the anti-influenza drug Arbidol for influenza caused by A/duck/Novosibirsk/56/05 (H5N1) (Influenza A virus, Alphainfluenzavirus, Orthomyxoviridae).]

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of influenza virus strains with drug resistance to antiviral drugs requires finding new compounds, potential direct-acting inhibitors. Аdamantane compounds drugs used since the 1960s have lost their activity the resulting due to resistance. Only neuraminidase inhibitors such as zanamivir and oseltamivir have been approved by WHO for influenza treatment. The Russian pharmaceutical drug Arbidol (Umifenovirum) is actively used in Russia. This drug is used to treat influenza in Russia, China and most post-Soviet republics. This work presents a new derivative of aminoadamantane - dichlorohydrate L-histidyl-1-adamantayl ethylamine (2HCl*H-His-Rim), which showed a high level of inhibition of strains of influenza virus A in vitro. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of antiviral properties of the new synthetic low-molecular inhibitor of influenza A virus replication and Arbidol drug pharmacy. METHODS: The compound 2HCl*H-His-Rim was obtained by classical peptide synthesis methods. It was identified by methods of mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy (IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Its antiviral properties have been studied in vitro for monolayer of cells Vero-E6 infected with a high-virulent strain of A/duck/Novosibirsk/56/06 (H5N1) influenza virus at various injection schemes of the investigated compounds. THE RESULTS: The antiviral activity of the 2HCl*H-His-Rim compound against the highly pathogenic strain of the influenza A/H5N1 virus was slightly higher than for the known pharmacy drug arbidol. DISCUSSION: The difference in antiviral activity of these two compounds is explained by different mechanisms of action on the viral particle. CONCLUSION: The 2HCl*H-His-Rim compound can be recommended as a candidate for preclinical and clinical trials in order to obtain an etiotropic antiviral drug based on it, due to its high efficacy and economic and synthetic availability. The synthetic compound 2HCl*H-His-Rim acts on influenza A virus variants resistant to Rimantadine and Amantadine.

Risk Assessment in Patients With Diabetes With the TIMI Risk Score for Atherothrombotic Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Improved risk assessment for patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk is needed. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) predicts a gradient of risk in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) but has not been evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CV event rates were compared by baseline TRS 2°P in 16,488 patients enrolled in SAVOR-TIMI 53 (Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53) with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk or established CV disease. Calibration was tested in the diabetes cohort from the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) Registry. RESULTS: TRS 2°P revealed a robust risk gradient for the composite of CV death, MI, and ischemic stroke in the full trial population, with 2-year event rates of 0.9% in the lowest- and 19.8% in the highest-risk groups (Ptrend < 0.001). A clear risk gradient was present within the subgroups of all coronary artery disease (CAD), CAD without prior MI, CAD with prior MI, peripheral artery disease, and prior stroke (Ptrend < 0.001 for each), with consistent risk relationships across subgroups. The C-statistic (0.71 for CV death and 0.66 for the composite end point) was consistent in each subgroup. There was close calibration with the type 2 diabetes cohort from the REACH Registry (goodness-of-fit P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The expanded TRS 2°P provides a practical and well-calibrated risk prediction tool for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Concordance with prescribing information dosage recommendations for dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) whose initial dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4-i) dosage was concordant with prescribing information (label) recommendations in the United States. METHODS: Adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who initiated a DPP4-i (linagliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin) between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2014 were identified using electronic medical records and administrative claims, with index date being the date of first observed DPP4-i treatment. Patients were required to have chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b, 4 or 5 (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [eGFR] value <45 ml/min/1.73 m2) during the 12 month pre-index period. Patients were classified as concordant or not concordant based on whether the first prescribed dose was consistent with label recommendations. Demographics, clinical characteristics, resource use and costs during pre-index were evaluated by DPP4-i concordance status. RESULTS: Of the 492 patients (323 sitagliptin, 57 saxagliptin, 112 linagliptin), 36.2% were prescribed doses that were not concordant with label recommendations (44.9% for sitagliptin, 57.9% for saxagliptin and 0% for linagliptin [which does not require dosage adjustment]). Concordant patients were slightly older (mean age 71 years vs. 68, p = .01) but had similar gender distribution (55% vs. 60% female, p = .31) compared to those who were not concordant. They had lower general health status (Charlson Comorbidity Score 2.6 vs. 2.2, p = .03), and had similar pre-index all-cause total costs ($25,245 vs. $21,972, p = .68) and lower pre-index T2DM-related costs ($1618 vs. $1922, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: More than a third of DPP4-i patients with CKD stage 3b or higher were prescribed doses not concordant with DPP4-i label dosage recommendations.

Healthcare costs among adults with type 2 diabetes initiating saxagliptin or linagliptin: a US-based claims analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare costs of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after initiation of saxagliptin or linagliptin, two antidiabetic medications in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor medication class. METHODS: Patients with T2D who were at least 18 years old and initiated saxagliptin or linagliptin (index date) between 1 June 2011 and 30 June 2014 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. All-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related costs (T2D diagnosis on a medical claim and/or an antidiabetic medication claim) were measured in the 1 year follow-up period. Saxagliptin and linagliptin initiators were matched using propensity score methods. Cost ratios (CRs) and predicted costs were estimated from generalized linear models and recycled predictions. RESULTS: There were 34,560 saxagliptin initiators and 18,175 linagliptin initiators identified (mean ages 57 and 59; 55% and 56% male, respectively). Before matching, saxagliptin initiators had significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs than linagliptin initiators (mean = $15,335 [SD $28,923] vs. mean = $20,069 [SD $48,541], p < .001) and significantly lower diabetes-related total healthcare costs (mean = $6109 [SD $13,851] vs. mean = $7393 [SD $26,041], p < .001). In matched analyses (n = 16,069 per cohort), saxagliptin initiators had lower all-cause follow-up costs than linagliptin initiators (CR = 0.953, 95% CI = 0.932-0.974, p < .001; predicted costs = $17,211 vs. $18,068). There was no significant difference in diabetes-related total costs after matching; however, diabetes-related medical costs were significantly lower for saxagliptin initiators (CR = 0.959, 95% CI = 0.927-0.993, p = 0.017; predicted costs = $3989 vs. $4159). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with T2D initiating treatment with saxagliptin had lower total all-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related medical costs over 1 year compared with patients initiating treatment with linagliptin.

Assessment of the Risk of Hospitalization for Heart Failure With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, Saxagliptin, Alogliptin, and Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Using an Alternative Measure to the Hazard Ratio.

BACKGROUND: Saxagliptin statistically significantly increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure compared with placebo in the clinical trial of SAVOR-TIMI 53. Neither the reason why only saxagliptin among several dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors increased the risk, nor the clinical implication of the result has been explained. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of hospitalization for heart failure associated with DPP-4 inhibitors by using an alternative measure to the hazard ratio. METHODS: We used the difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) between DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular events, including hospitalization for heart failure associated with DPP-4 inhibitors. Three randomized clinical trials with cardiovascular events as a primary end point-EXAMINE (alogliptin), SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin), and TECOS (sitagliptin)-were reevaluated by estimating the RMSTs for the DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo based on the reconstructed individual patient data for each time-to-event outcome from publicly available information. RESULTS: The differences of RMSTs (DPP-4 inhibitors minus placebo) for hospitalization for heart failure were -4 days [-6, -2] in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 (720 days follow-up), -3 days [-9, 3] in the EXAMINE (900 days follow-up), and 1 day [-5, 7] in the TECOS (1440 days follow-up). There were no substantial differences in the risk of other cardiovascular outcomes between DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: There are no substantial clinically relevant differences in the risk of cardiovascular events, including hospitalization for heart failure, between 3 of the DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo.

Dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The projected rise in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) could develop into a substantial health problem worldwide. Whether dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues are able to prevent or delay T2DM and its associated complications in people at risk for the development of T2DM is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues on the prevention or delay of T2DM and its associated complications in people with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting blood glucose, moderately elevated glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or any combination of these. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; PubMed; Embase; ClinicalTrials.gov; the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; and the reference lists of systematic reviews, articles and health technology assessment reports. We asked investigators of the included trials for information about additional trials. The date of the last search of all databases was January 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration of 12 weeks or more comparing DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues with any pharmacological glucose-lowering intervention, behaviour-changing intervention, placebo or no intervention in people with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, moderately elevated HbA1c or combinations of these. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors read all abstracts and full-text articles and records, assessed quality and extracted outcome data independently. One review author extracted data which were checked by a second review author. We resolved discrepancies by consensus or the involvement of a third review author. For meta-analyses, we planned to use a random-effects model with investigation of risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for effect estimates. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence using the GRADE instrument. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven completed RCTs; about 98 participants were randomised to a DPP-4 inhibitor as monotherapy and 1620 participants were randomised to a GLP-1 analogue as monotherapy. Two trials investigated a DPP-4 inhibitor and five trials investigated a GLP-1 analogue. A total of 924 participants with data on allocation to control groups were randomised to a comparator group; 889 participants were randomised to placebo and 33 participants to metformin monotherapy. One RCT of liraglutide contributed 85% of all participants. The duration of the intervention varied from 12 weeks to 160 weeks. We judged none of the included trials at low risk of bias for all 'Risk of bias' domains and did not perform meta-analyses because there were not enough trials.One trial comparing the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin with placebo reported no deaths (very low-quality evidence). The incidence of T2DM by means of WHO diagnostic criteria in this trial was 3/90 participants randomised to vildagliptin versus 1/89 participants randomised to placebo (very low-quality evidence). Also, 1/90 participants on vildagliptin versus 2/89 participants on placebo experienced a serious adverse event (very low-quality evidence). One out of 90 participants experienced congestive heart failure in the vildagliptin group versus none in the placebo group (very low-quality evidence). There were no data on non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, health-related quality of life or socioeconomic effects reported.All-cause and cardiovascular mortality following treatment with GLP-1 analogues were rarely reported; one trial of exenatide reported that no participant died. Another trial of liraglutide 3.0 mg showed that 2/1501 in the liraglutide group versus 2/747 in the placebo group died after 160 weeks of treatment (very low-quality evidence).The incidence of T2DM following treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg compared to placebo after 160 weeks was 26/1472 (1.8%) participants randomised to liraglutide versus 46/738 (6.2%) participants randomised to placebo (very low-quality evidence). The trial established the risk for (diagnosis of) T2DM as HbA1c 5.7% to 6.4% (6.5% or greater), fasting plasma glucose 5.6 mmol/L or greater to 6.9 mmol/L or less (7.0 mmol/L or greater) or two-hour post-load plasma glucose 7.8 mmol/L or greater to 11.0 mmol/L (11.1 mmol/L). Altogether, 70/1472 (66%) participants regressed from intermediate hyperglycaemia to normoglycaemia compared with 268/738 (36%) participants in the placebo group. The incidence of T2DM after the 12-week off-treatment extension period (i.e. after 172 weeks) showed that five additional participants were diagnosed T2DM in the liraglutide group, compared with one participant in the placebo group. After 12-week treatment cessation, 740/1472 (50%) participants in the liraglutide group compared with 263/738 (36%) participants in the placebo group had normoglycaemia.One trial used exenatide and 2/17 participants randomised to exenatide versus 1/16 participants randomised to placebo developed T2DM (very low-quality evidence). This trial did not provide a definition of T2DM. One trial reported serious adverse events in 230/1524 (15.1%) participants in the liraglutide 3.0 mg arm versus 96/755 (12.7%) participants in the placebo arm (very low quality evidence). There were no serious adverse events in the trial using exenatide. Non-fatal myocardial infarction was reported in 1/1524 participants in the liraglutide arm and in 0/55 participants in the placebo arm at 172 weeks (very low-quality evidence). One trial reported congestive heart failure in 1/1524 participants in the liraglutide arm and in 1/755 participants in the placebo arm (very low-quality evidence). Participants receiving liraglutide compared with placebo had a small mean improvement in the physical component of the 36-item Short Form scale showing a difference of 0.87 points (95% CI 0.17 to 1.58; P = 0.02; 1 trial; 1791 participants; very low-quality evidence). No trial evaluating GLP-1-analogues reported data on stroke, microvascular complications or socioeconomic effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no firm evidence that DPP-4 inhibitors or GLP-1 analogues compared mainly with placebo substantially influence the risk of T2DM and especially its associated complications in people at increased risk for the development of T2DM. Most trials did not investigate patient-important outcomes.

Health-related quality-of-life implications of cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A subanalysis from the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR)-TIMI 53 trial.

BACKGROUND: The impact of cardiovascular complications on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been clearly established. Using EQ5D utility data from SAVOR-TIMI 53, a large phase IV trial of saxagliptin versus placebo, we quantified the impact of cardiovascular and other major events on HRQoL. METHODS: EQ5D utilities were recorded annually and following myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Utilities among patients experiencing major cardiovascular events were analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics (including EQ5D utility), and compared to those not experiencing major cardiovascular events. Mean utility decrements with standard errors (SE) were estimated as the difference in utility before and after the event. FINDINGS: The mean EQ5D utility of the sample was 0.776 at all time points, and did not differ by treatment. However, mean baseline and month 12 utilities among those with a major cardiovascular event were 0.751 and 0.714. Mean utilities were 0.691 within 3months of, 0.691 3-6months after, and 0.714 6-12months after, a major cardiovascular event. Cardiovascular event-specific utility decrements were 0.05 (0.007) for major cardiovascular events over the same time periods. Decrements of 0.051 (0.012; myocardial infarction), 0.111 (0.022; stroke), 0.065 (0.014; hospitalization for heart failure) 0.019 (0.024; hospitalization for hypoglycemia) were estimated; all coefficients were statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: Consistent with clinical outcomes reported elsewhere, saxagliptin did not improve HRQoL. Cardiovascular complications were associated with significantly decreased HRQoL, most substantial earlier after the event. FUNDING: BMS/AZ.

Cost-effectiveness of vildagliptin for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Brazil; findings and implications.

INTRODUCTION: Vildagliptin is an inhibitor of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4, indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, combined or not with metformin. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vildagliptin in the Brazilian context. Areas covered: Using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Lilacs and CRD, six studies were selected for the economic models. This study utilised cost data in the Brazilian health system to provide the context. Expert commentary: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an epidemic disease and represents a challenge for all health care systems. Although guidelines clearly define first-line treatment, there are several other promising treatments. Vildagliptin is one of them, resulting in a mean lifetime increase of 0.31 years compared to metformin alone and 1.19 more life years compared to other metformin combinations. Considering observational data, life years with dual vildagliptin-containing treatments were 0.37 more compared to other dual treatments. However, its high cost versus generic metformin and its unclear safety profile weakens its subsequent cost-effectiveness. Consequently, the incorporation of vildagliptin or its combination with metformin is currently not recommended for the Brazilian Health Care System. This may change as more data becomes available.

Adherence, Persistence, and Health Care Costs for Patients Receiving Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are among the newer, yet more established, classes of diabetes medications. OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence, persistence, and health care costs among patients taking DPP-4 inhibitors. METHODS: Claims were extracted from Humana Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) or commercial plans for patients aged > 18 years with ≥ 1 prescription filled for a DPP-4 inhibitor between July 1, 2011, and March 31, 2013. The first prescription claim for a DPP-4 inhibitor established the index date and index medication; 12-month pre-index and post-index data were analyzed. The Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI) was used to assess a level of baseline diabetes-related comorbidities. Adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%) and persistence (< 31-day gap) measures were compared before and after, adjusting for DCSI, pre-index insulin, age, and gender. Post-index costs (in 2013 U.S. dollars) were compared using general linear modeling (GLM) to adjust for pre-index costs, DCSI, pre-index insulin, age, and gender. RESULTS: Based on study criteria, 22,860 patients with MAPD coverage (17,292 sitagliptin, 4,282 saxagliptin, and 1,286 linagliptin) and 3,229 patients with commercial coverage (2,368 sitagliptin, 643 saxagliptin, and 218 linagliptin) were included. For MAPD patients, the mean age was 70-72 years, and females represented 50%-52% of patients. For commercial patients, mean age was 55-56 years, and females represented 44% of patients. Clinical indicators for patients on linagliptin showed a higher comorbidity level than sitagliptin or saxagliptin cohorts (MAPD DCSI 3.0 vs 2.4 and 2.2, P < 0.001; commercial DCSI 1.2 vs. 0.9 and 0.9, P < 0.001); a higher use of pre-index insulin (MAPD 22% vs. 15% and 14%, P < 0.001; commercial 18% vs. 11% and 10%, P = 0.003); and higher mean pre-index costs (MAPD $14,448 vs. $11,818 and $10,399, P < 0.001; commercial $13,868 vs. $9,357 and $8,223, P = 0.016). For the MAPD cohort, the unadjusted PDC was lower for linagliptin patients (67%) compared with saxagliptin (72%) or sitagliptin (72%) patients (P < 0.001). Significant differences were still seen when adjusted for covariates. Linagliptin patients were more likely to be nonpersistent (73%) than those on saxagliptin (65%) or sitagliptin (67%; P < 0.01 for adjusted and unadjusted comparisons). For the commercial population, there were no significant differences in mean PDC between the 3 groups (linagliptin 70%, saxagliptin 72%, and sitagliptin 74%; P = 0.096). Dichotomized comparisons of nonpersistence were significantly different (linagliptin 65%, saxagliptin 62%, and sitagliptin 57%; P = 0.010), although upon adjustment using a Cox proportional hazard model, no significant differences were found. When controlling for other factors, post-index adjusted health care costs were similar between the medication cohorts (MAPD: sitagliptin = $13,913, saxagliptin = $13,651, and linagliptin = $13,859; commercial: sitagliptin = $11,677, saxagliptin = $12,059, and linagliptin = $11,163; all P > 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: For MAPD and commercial populations, baseline patient demographics were similar between the 3 DPP-4 inhibitor groups, but the linagliptin group may have had more complex patients (higher pre-index costs, higher DCSI, and more use of insulin). For the MAPD population, patients on linagliptin were less adherent and persistent than patients taking sitagliptin or saxagliptin for all unadjusted and adjusted comparisons. For the commercial population, which was notably smaller, these differences were in the same direction, but not all were statistically significant. When controlling for baseline factors, 12-month post-index direct medical health care costs were similar between index DPP-4 inhibitors. DISCLOSURES: No external funding was provided for this research. The project was done as part of internal work by Humana employees. Rascati received no compensation. None of the authors have any financial disclosures or conflicts of interests to report. Worley and Everhart are employees of Comprehensive Health Insights, a subsidiary of Humana, and Meah is an employee of Humana. Discussion of the adherence and persistence data was presented as a poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus Conference, October 2015. Cost data were presented as a poster at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 18th Annual European Congress, November 2015. Study concept and design were contributed by Rascati, Worley, and Meah, along with Everhart. Rascati took the lead in data collection, assisted by Meah, and data interpretation was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was written primarily by Rascati, along with Worley, Everhart, and Meah, and revised by Rascati, Everhart, and Worley, with assistance from Meah.

Cost-Effectiveness of Saxagliptin versus Acarbose as Second-Line Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes in China.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the long-term cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin+metformin (SAXA+MET) versus acarbose+metformin (ACAR+MET) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on MET alone. METHODS: Systematic literature reviews were performed to identify studies directly comparing SAXA+MET versus ACAR+MET, and to obtain diabetes-related events costs which were modified by hospital surveys. A Cardiff Diabetes Model was used to estimate the long-term economic and health treatment consequences in patients with T2DM. Costs (2014 Chinese yuan) were calculated from the payer's perspective and estimated over a patient's lifetime. RESULTS: SAXA+MET predicted lower incidences of most cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia events and fatal events, and decreased total costs compared with ACAR+MET. For an individual patient, the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with SAXA+MET was 0.48 more than ACAR+MET at a cost saving of ¥18,736, which resulted in a cost saving of ¥38,640 per QALY gained for SAXA+MET versus ACAR+MET. Results were robust across various univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: SAXA+MET is a cost-effective treatment alternative compared with ACAR+MET for patients with T2DM in China, with a little QALYs gain and lower costs. SAXA is an effective, well-tolerated drug with a low incidence of adverse events and ease of administration; it is anticipated to be an effective second-line therapy for T2DM treatment.

Bioequivalence and food effect assessment for vildagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination tablets relative to free combination of vildagliptin and metformin in Japanese healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of vildagliptin/metformin fixeddose combination (FDC) tablets (50/250 mg and 50/500 mg) to free combinations of vildagliptin and metformin and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vildagliptin and metformin following administration of 50/500 mg FDC tablets. METHODS: Two openlabel, randomized, single-center, singledose, 2-period crossover studies were conducted in Japanese healthy male volunteers. Participants were administered vildagliptin/ metformin FDC tablets (study I: 50/250 mg, study II: 50/500 mg) or their free combinations under fasted condition. Food effect (standard Japanese breakfast: fat, 20 - 30% with ~ 600 kcal in total) was assessed during an additional period in study II (50/500 mg). PK parameters (AUC, C(max), t(max), t(1/2)) were calculated for vildagliptin and metformin. RESULTS: In both studies, vildagliptin/metformin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to their respective free combinations. Administration of FDC tablets after meals had no effect on vildagliptin PK parameters. The rate of absorption of metformin decreased when administered under fed condition, as reflected by a prolonged t(max) (3 hours in fasted state vs. 4 hours in fed state) and decrease in C(max) by 26%, however, the extent of absorption (AUC(last)) was similar to that in the fasted state. CONCLUSIONS: Vildagliptin/metformin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to their free combinations. Food decreased the C(max) of metformin by 26%, while AUC(last) was unchanged, consistent with previous reports. No food effect was observed on the C(max) or AUC(last) of vildagliptin. Thus, food had no clinically relevant effects on the PK of metformin or vildagliptin.

Does the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin reduce HbA1c to a greater extent in Japanese patients than in Caucasian patients?

BACKGROUND: Previous work suggests that Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may respond more favorably to a DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitor than Caucasians. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily [bid]) between Japanese and Caucasian populations. METHODS: This analysis pooled data from 19 studies of drug-naïve patients with T2DM who were treated for 12 weeks with vildagliptin 50 mg bid as monotherapy. The pool comprised Japanese patients (n=338) who had been treated in Japan and Caucasian patients (n=1,275) who were treated elsewhere. Change from baseline (Δ) in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 12 weeks (in millimoles per mole) versus baseline HbA1c (both in percentage National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program units [NGSP%] and millimoles per mole) for each population was reported. Universal HbA1c in millimoles per mole was calculated from either the Japanese Diabetes Society or the NGSP% HbA1c standards. RESULTS: At baseline, mean values for Japanese and Caucasian patients, respectively, were as follows: age, 59 years and 56 years; % male, 69% and 57%. The average HbA1c was reduced from 7.90% to 6.96% (Japanese Diabetes Society) and from 8.57% to 7.50% (United States National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program), while HbA1c was reduced from 63 mmol/mol to 53 mmol/mol and from 70 mmol/mol to 58 mmol/mol in Japanese and Caucasians, respectively. ΔHbA1c increased with increasing baseline in both populations. The slopes were the same (0.41, r (2)=0.36; and 0.41, r (2)=0.15), and the intercepts were 15.4 mmol/mol and 17.2 mmol/mol, respectively. In Japanese patients, mean ΔHbA1c was greater by 1.7 mmol/mol (0.2% NGSP HbA1c) at any given baseline HbA1c than in Caucasians (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: The present pooled analysis suggests that Japanese patients respond better to vildagliptin treatment compared with Caucasians. However, when glycemic control was corrected by using the same glycemic standard, the difference in HbA1c reduction between these populations was not clinically meaningful.

Seguridad y eficacia de vildagliptina en el tratamiento de pacientes adultos mayores con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus tipo 2, con riesgo de hipoglicemia y limitantes para uso de insulina (con alto grado de dependencia), sin control metabólico adecuado (según HBA1C) a pesar de tratamiento con metformina a dosis máxima y glibenclamida / Safety and efficacy of vildagliptin in the treatment of elderly patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, with risk of hypoglycemia and limitations of insulin use (with a high degree of dependence), without adequate metabolic control

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) ha recibido la solicitud de evaluar el uso de vildagliptina para su uso en pacientes adultos mayores con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus tipo 2, con riesgo de hipoglicemia y limitantes para uso de insulina (con alto grado de dependencia), sin control metabólico adecuado (según HBA1c) a pesar de tratamiento con metformina a dosis máxima y Glibenclamida dentro del sistema de EsSalud, indicación actualmente no contemplada en el petitorio de medicamentos. Generalidades: La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM-2), forma que representa el 90-95% de los casos de diabetes. Es una enfermedad metabólica crónica que se caracteriza por la pérdida paulatina de la capacidad de secretar insulina a nivel de las células beta del páncreas así como por el aumento progresivo de la resistencia a la insulina, lo cual hace que los pacientes mantengan y eventualmente sufran las consecuencias de mantener niveles elevados de glucosa en su sangre. Como tal la DM-2 constituye una seria amenaza para la salud pública tanto a nivel mundial como en el Perú donde se prevé que pronto se convertirá uno de los principales contribuyentes a la carga de enfermedad en el país. Su incidencia en el Perú se encuentra en aumento. Tecnología Sanitaria de Interés: Los Inhibidores de DPP-4: Los inhibidores de DPP-4 son hipoglicemiantes orales que actúan como inhibidores reversibles de las enzima DPP-4 (dipeptidil peptidasa 4, EC 3.4.14.5), una enzima que está implicada en la inactivación de las hormonas incretinas GLP-1 (péptido similar al glucagón 1) y GIP (polipéptido insulinotrópico dependiente de la glucosa), ambas a su vez implicadas en la regulación fisiológica de la homeostasis de la glucosa. Descubiertos hace ya más de una década, a la fecha en el mercado internacional se disponen de más de ocho diferentes inhibidores de DPP-4. METODOLOGÍA: Estrategia de Búsqueda: El protocolo de esta revisión sistemática fue preparado y revisado con el equipo técnico de IETSI. Las siguientes fuentes han sido revisadas y consultadas: Medline/Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Trip Database, The Cochrane Library, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) del Reino Unido, The National Guideline Clearinghouse (NCG) de los Estados Unidos, The International Diabetes Federation (IFD). RESULTADOS: uego de revisar un total de 837 documentos resultados de nuestra búsqueda bibliográfica, logramos filtrar 61 estudios relevantes para nuestra pregunta PICO de interés (Tabla 1), de los cuales sólo 8 fueron finalmente seleccionados para nuestro análisis toda vez que constituían estudios relevantes que resumían la mejor evidencia disponible (5 ensayos clínicos, 1 meta-análisis y una guía clínica) sobre la eficacia y seguridad atribuible al uso de un inhibidor de DPP-4 en regímenes de terapia doble (combinado con metformina) o triple (combinado con metformina y una sulfonilurea) comparados con metformina más una sulfonilurea en el manejo de pacientes con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus de tipo 2. CONCLUSIONES: A la fecha no se puede recomendar el uso de inhibidores de DPP-4 como una alternativa tan o más eficaz y segura a la terapia combinada con metformina y una sulfonilurea, ya sea en regímenes de terapia doble (como reemplazo de la sulfonilurea) o triple (como un tercer hipoglicemiante oral adicional a este esquema de tratamiento) en el manejo de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 con mal control metabólico no tributarios de manejo con insulina. La evidencia disponible sugiere que el uso de inhibidores de DDP-4 en un régimen doble (metformina más un inhibidor de DPP-4) si bien es una alternativa de tratamiento que se asocia con un riesgo igual o menor de eventos adversos que la terapia combinada con metformina y una sulfonilurea, no ofrece mayor beneficio en términos de eficacia; mientras que por el contrario, en el caso de la terapia triple (metformina más una sulfonilurea y un inhibidor de DPP-4) si bien sí constituye una alternativa de tratamiento más eficaz que la terapia combinada con metformina y una sulfonilurea se asocia con un mayor riesgo de eventos adversos asociados al tratamiento, y en particular con un mayor riesgo de eventos hipoglicémicos. Asimismo a la fecha, poco se sabe con respecto la seguridad del uso de inhibidores de DPP-4 al largo plazo, en cualquier régimen de tratamiento, desconociéndose en particular cuál puede ser impacto en el riesgo cardiovascular de los pacientes al largo plazo. En consecuencia, no podemos recomendar el uso de ningún inhibidor de DPP-4 en regímenes de terapia dual o triple, en el tratamiento de pacientes adulto mayores de 60 años con diagnóstico de DM-2, con riesgo de hipoglicemia y limitantes para uso de insulina (con alto grado de dependencia*), sin control metabólico adecuado (según HbAl c) con metformina a dosis máxima y Glibenclamida por cuanto no se disponen de evidencias suficientes para sobrepesar los beneficios con respecto a los riesgos al largo plazo que su uso pueda tener.