Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 18(1): e0011932, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38295107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination program in all sixty-three endemic districts of Nepal was based on annual mass drug administration (MDA) using a combination of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole for at least 5 years. The MDA program was started in the Parsa district of the Terai region and at least six rounds of MDA were completed between 2003 and 2017 in all filariasis endemic districts of Central Nepal. Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) report indicated that circulating filarial antigen (CFA) prevalence was below the critical value i.e., ≤ 2% in selected LF endemic districts of Central Nepal. Based on the TAS report, antigen-positive cases were found clustered in the foci of those districts which were considered as "hotspots". Hence the present study was designed to assess microfilaremia in hotspots of four endemic districts of Central Nepal after the MDA program. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The present study assessed microfilaremia in hotspots of four endemic districts i.e. Lalitpur and Dhading from the hilly region and Bara and Mahottari from the Terai region of Central Nepal. Night blood samples (n = 1722) were collected by finger prick method from the eligible sample population irrespective of age and sex. Community people's participation in the MDA program was ensured using a structured questionnaire and chronic clinical manifestation of LF was assessed using standard case definition. Two districts one each from the hilly region (Lalitpur district) and Terai region (Bara district) showed improved microfilaria (MF) prevalence i.e. below the critical level (<1%) while the other two districts are still over the critical level. There was a significantly high prevalence of MF in male (p = <0.05) and ≥41 years of age group (p = <0.05) community people in the hotspots of four endemic districts. People who participated in the previous rounds of the MDA program have significantly low MF prevalence. The upper confidence limit of MF prevalence in all hotspots of four districts was above the critical level (>1%). Chronic clinical manifestation of LF showed significant association with the older age group (≥41 years) but not with sex. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed LF transmission improved in hotspots of two districts while continued in others but the risk of LF resurgence cannot be ignored since the upper confidence level of MF prevalence is over 1% in all the hotspots studied districts. High MF prevalence is well correlated with the number of MDA rounds but not with the MDA coverage. Community people involved in MDA drug uptake in any previous and last rounds have significantly less MF infection. Hence it is recommended that before deciding to stop the MDA rounds it is essential to conduct the MF survey at the hotspots of the sentinel sites.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Animais , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Nepal/epidemiologia , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Microfilárias , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Wuchereria bancrofti
2.
Int J Public Health ; 68: 1605510, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36846154

RESUMO

Objective: This study assessed the coverage of albendazole (ALB) in mass drug administration (MDA) programs implemented before (2019) and during the (2020 and 2021) COVID-19 pandemic in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Methods: Standardized questionnaires were administered to 1,127 children across three peri-urban communities to ascertain if they received and swallowed ALB across the years. Reasons, why ALB was not received, were documented and analyzed in SPSS. 20.0. Results: In 2019, the medicine reach was between 42.2%-57.8%, however, during the pandemic, the reach significantly reduced to 12.3%-18.6%, and increased to 28.5%-35.2% in 2021 (p < 0.000). About 19.6%-27.2% of the participants have missed 1 MDA, while 26.9%-37.8% and 22.4%-32.8% have missed 2 and 3 MDAs, respectively. The majority who did not receive ALB (60.8%-75%) claimed drug distributors never came, while about 14.9%-20.3% mentioned they did not hear about MDA. However, individual compliance towards swallowing was above 94% across the study years (p < 0.00). Conclusion: These results highlight the need to explore the perceptions of those who have consistently missed MDAs, and also understand the health-system-related issues including those imposed by the pandemic affecting MDA.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Helmintíase , Criança , Humanos , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Helmintíase/tratamento farmacológico , Helmintíase/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Pandemias , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis
3.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(2): e0010231, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) has been targeted for global elimination as a public health problem since 1997. The primary strategy to interrupt transmission is annual mass drug administration (MDA) for ≥5 years. The transmission assessment survey (TAS) was developed as a decision-making tool to measure LF antigenemia in children to determine when MDA in a region can be stopped. The objective of this study was to investigate potential sampling strategies for follow-up of LF-positive children identified in TAS to detect evidence of ongoing transmission. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Nippes Department in Haiti passed TAS 1 with 2 positive cases and stopped MDA in 2015; however, 8 positive children were found during TAS 2 in 2017, which prompted a more thorough assessment of ongoing transmission. Purposive sampling was used to select the closest 50 households to each index case household, and systematic random sampling was used to select 20 households from each index case census enumeration area. All consenting household members aged ≥2 years were surveyed and tested for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) using the rapid filarial test strip and for Wb123-specific antibodies using the Filaria Detect IgG4 ELISA. Among 1,927 participants, 1.5% were CFA-positive and 4.5% were seropositive. CFA-positive individuals were identified for 6 of 8 index cases. Positivity ranged from 0.4-2.4%, with highest positivity in the urban commune Miragoane. Purposive sampling found the highest number of CFA-positives (17 vs. 9), and random sampling found a higher percent positive (2.4% vs. 1.4%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, both purposive and random sampling methods were reasonable and achievable methods of TAS follow-up in resource-limited settings. Both methods identified additional CFA-positives in close geographic proximity to LF-positive children found by TAS, and both identified strong signs of ongoing transmission in the large urban commune of Miragoane. These findings will help inform standardized guidelines for post-TAS surveillance.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Animais , Antígenos de Helmintos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Haiti/epidemiologia , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Prevalência , Wuchereria bancrofti
4.
Lymphat Res Biol ; 20(3): 319-324, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34619046

RESUMO

Background: Anecdotal evidence collected by a community organization suggested high prevalence of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in Sitapur district, Uttar Pradesh. Village volunteers subsequently conducted a line listing in 13 villages of Pisawan block and recorded 261 cases of known LF complications, namely hydrocele and lymphedema. This being far higher than official projections, a block-wide cluster survey was conducted to estimate the disease burden more accurately. Methods: Cluster sampling techniques were applied, and 41 clusters selected within Pisawan block. Survey teams comprising one woman and man interviewed member of all households in the cluster, recording details of individuals suffering from hydrocele or lymphedema within them. Age and gender were noted, as well as duration of symptoms and details of any treatment availed. Results: A total of 1851 patients (1256 males and 595 females) were reported to have lymphedema, hydrocele, or both in the 6931 households surveyed. This equates to a prevalence rate of 4.95% (with 9.75% margin of error) in Pisawan block. With these calculations, an estimated 11,049 + 1077 patients with LF complications in Pisawan block, Sitapur, UP in 2016. Conclusions: The high prevalence rate of LF complications in Pisawan block is disconcerting, especially considering India's commitment to eliminate LF by 2020. Compliance with Mass Drug Administration (MDA) must be improved. Furthermore, the Morbidity Management and Disability Prevention (MMDP) component of the National Programme for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (PELF) must be strengthened so that such patients can lead a productive life.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Linfedema , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Filariose Linfática/diagnóstico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Prevalência
5.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(3): e0009002, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many countries will not reach elimination targets for lymphatic filariasis in 2020 using the two-drug treatment regimen (diethylcarbamazine citrate [DEC] and albendazole [DA]). A cluster-randomized, community-based safety study performed in Fiji, Haiti, India, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea tested the safety and efficacy of a new regimen of ivermectin, DEC and albendazole (IDA). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To assess acceptability of IDA and DA, a mixed methods study was embedded within this community-based safety study. The study objective was to assess the acceptability of IDA versus DA. Community surveys were performed in each country with randomly selected participants (>14 years) from the safety study participant list in both DA and IDA arms. In depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGD) assessed acceptability-related themes. In 1919 individuals, distribution of sex, microfilariae (Mf) presence and circulating filarial antigenemia (CFA), adverse events (AE) and age were similar across arms. A composite acceptability score summed the values from nine indicators (range 9-36). The median (22.5) score indicated threshold of acceptability. There was no difference in scores for IDA and DA regimens. Mean acceptability scores across both treatment arms were: Fiji 33.7 (95% CI: 33.1-34.3); Papua New Guinea 32.9 (95% CI: 31.9-33.8); Indonesia 30.6 (95% CI: 29.8-31.3); Haiti 28.6 (95% CI: 27.8-29.4); India 26.8 (95% CI: 25.6-28) (P<0.001). AE, Mf or CFA were not associated with acceptability. Qualitative research (27 FGD; 42 IDI) highlighted professionalism and appreciation for AE support. No major concerns were detected about number of tablets. Increased uptake of LF treatment by individuals who had never complied with MDA was observed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IDA and DA regimens for LF elimination were highly and equally acceptable in individuals participating in the community-based safety study in Fiji, Haiti, India, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea. Country variation in acceptability was significant. Acceptability of the professionalism of the treatment delivery was highlighted.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Profissionalismo , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(2_Suppl): 46-53, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32618249

RESUMO

Community-wide administration of antimalarial drugs in therapeutic doses is a potential tool to prevent malaria infection and reduce the malaria parasite reservoir. To measure the effectiveness and cost of using the antimalarial drug combination dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAp) through different community-wide distribution strategies, Zambia's National Malaria Control Centre conducted a three-armed community-randomized controlled trial. The trial arms were as follows: 1) standard of care (SoC) malaria interventions, 2) SoC plus focal mass drug administration (fMDA), and 3) SoC plus MDA. Mass drug administration consisted of offering all eligible individuals DHAP, irrespective of a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) result. Focal mass drug administration consisted of offering DHAP to all eligible individuals who resided in a household where anyone tested positive by RDT. Results indicate that the costs of fMDA and MDA per person targeted and reached are similar (US$9.01 versus US$8.49 per person, respectively, P = 0.87), but that MDA was superior in all cost-effectiveness measures, including cost per infection averted, cost per case averted, cost per death averted, and cost per disability-adjusted life year averted. Subsequent costing of the MDA intervention in a non-trial, operational setting yielded significantly lower costs per person reached (US$2.90). Mass drug administration with DHAp also met the WHO thresholds for "cost-effective interventions" in the Zambian setting in 90% of simulations conducted using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on trial costs, whereas fMDA met these criteria in approximately 50% of simulations. A sensitivity analysis using costs from operational deployment and trial effectiveness yielded improved cost-effectiveness estimates. Mass drug administration may be a cost-effective intervention in the Zambian context and can help reduce the parasite reservoir substantially. Mass drug administration was more cost-effective in relatively higher transmission settings. In all scenarios examined, the cost-effectiveness of MDA was superior to that of fMDA.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/economia , Artemisininas/economia , Erradicação de Doenças/economia , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Quinolinas/economia , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Artemisininas/administração & dosagem , Artemisininas/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Custos de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Falciparum/economia , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Plasmodium falciparum/efeitos dos fármacos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Zâmbia/epidemiologia
7.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(6): e0008301, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32479495

RESUMO

Achieving elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem requires a minimum of five effective rounds of mass drug administration (MDA) and demonstrating low prevalence in subsequent assessments. The first assessments recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) are sentinel and spot-check sites-referred to as pre-transmission assessment surveys (pre-TAS)-in each implementation unit after MDA. If pre-TAS shows that prevalence in each site has been lowered to less than 1% microfilaremia or less than 2% antigenemia, the implementation unit conducts a TAS to determine whether MDA can be stopped. Failure to pass pre-TAS means that further rounds of MDA are required. This study aims to understand factors influencing pre-TAS results using existing programmatic data from 554 implementation units, of which 74 (13%) failed, in 13 countries. Secondary data analysis was completed using existing data from Bangladesh, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ghana, Haiti, Indonesia, Mali, Nepal, Niger, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, and Uganda. Additional covariate data were obtained from spatial raster data sets. Bivariate analysis and multilinear regression were performed to establish potential relationships between variables and the pre-TAS result. Higher baseline prevalence and lower elevation were significant in the regression model. Variables statistically significantly associated with failure (p-value ≤0.05) in the bivariate analyses included baseline prevalence at or above 5% or 10%, use of Filariasis Test Strips (FTS), primary vector of Culex, treatment with diethylcarbamazine-albendazole, higher elevation, higher population density, higher enhanced vegetation index (EVI), higher annual rainfall, and 6 or more rounds of MDA. This paper reports for the first time factors associated with pre-TAS results from a multi-country analysis. This information can help countries more effectively forecast program activities, such as the potential need for more rounds of MDA, and prioritize resources to ensure adequate coverage of all persons in areas at highest risk of failing pre-TAS.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Saúde Pública , Fatores de Risco
8.
BMC Med ; 18(1): 149, 2020 06 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552743

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration and mass-screen-and-treat interventions have been used to interrupt malaria transmission and reduce burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Determining which strategy will reduce costs is an important challenge for implementers; however, model-based simulations and field studies have yet to develop consensus guidelines. Moreover, there is often no way for decision-makers to directly interact with these data and/or models, incorporate local knowledge and expertise, and re-fit parameters to guide their specific goals. METHODS: We propose a general framework for comparing costs associated with mass drug administrations and mass screen and treat based on the possible outcomes of each intervention and the costs associated with each outcome. We then used publicly available data from six countries in western Africa to develop spatial-explicit probabilistic models to estimate intervention costs based on baseline malaria prevalence, diagnostic performance, and sociodemographic factors (age and urbanicity). In addition to comparing specific scenarios, we also develop interactive web applications which allow managers to select data sources and model parameters, and directly input their own cost values. RESULTS: The regional-level models revealed substantial spatial heterogeneity in malaria prevalence and diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity, indicating that a "one-size-fits-all" approach is unlikely to maximize resource allocation. For instance, urban communities in Burkina Faso typically had lower prevalence rates compared to rural communities (0.151 versus 0.383, respectively) as well as lower diagnostic sensitivity (0.699 versus 0.862, respectively); however, there was still substantial regional variation. Adjusting the cost associated with false negative diagnostic results to included additional costs, such as delayed treated and potential lost wages, undermined the overall costs associated with MSAT. CONCLUSIONS: The observed spatial variability and dependence on specified cost values support not only the need for location-specific intervention approaches but also the need to move beyond standard modeling approaches and towards interactive tools which allow implementers to engage directly with data and models. We believe that the framework demonstrated in this article will help connect modeling efforts and stakeholders in order to promote data-driven decision-making for the effective management of malaria, as well as other diseases.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/economia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Humanos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos
9.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(4): e0008153, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302298

RESUMO

The World Health Organization's Neglected Tropical Disease Roadmap has accelerated progress towards eliminating select neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). This momentum has catalyzed research to determine the feasibility of interrupting transmission of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) using community-wide mass drug administration (MDA). This study aims to identify potential gender-specific facilitators and barriers to accessing and participating in community-wide STH MDA, with the goal of ensuring programs are equitable and maximize the probability of interrupting STH transmission. This research was conducted prior to the launch of community-wide MDA for STH in Comé, Benin. A total of 10 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted separately among 40 men, 38 women, and 15 community drug distributors (CDDs). Salient themes included: both men and women believe that community-wide MDA would reduce the financial burden associated with self-treatment, particularly for low income adults. Community members believe MDA should be packaged alongside water, sanitation, and other health services. Women feel past community-wide programs have been disorganized and are concerned these distributions will be similar. Women also expressed interest in increased engagement in the implementation of future community-based public health programs. Men often did not perceive themselves to be at great risk for STH infection and did not express a high demand for treatment. Finally, the barriers discussed by CDDs generally did not align with gender-specific concerns, but rather represented concerns shared by both genders. A door-to-door distribution strategy for STH MDA is preferred by women in this study, as this platform empowers women to participate as health decision makers for their family. In addition, involving women in planning and implementation of community-wide programs may help to increase treatment coverage and compliance.


Assuntos
Helmintíase/tratamento farmacológico , Helmintíase/prevenção & controle , Helmintíase/transmissão , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Benin/epidemiologia , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Helmintíase/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saneamento , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Solo/parasitologia , Água/parasitologia
10.
PLoS One ; 15(2): e0228469, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074112

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The decision-making process for malaria control and elimination strategies has become more challenging. Interventions need to be targeted at council level to allow for changing malaria epidemiology and an increase in the number of possible interventions. Models of malaria dynamics can support this process by simulating potential impacts of multiple interventions in different settings and determining appropriate packages of interventions for meeting specific expected targets. METHODS: The OpenMalaria model of malaria dynamics was calibrated for all 184 councils in mainland Tanzania using data from malaria indicator surveys, school parasitaemia surveys, entomological surveillance, and vector control deployment data. The simulations were run for different transmission intensities per region and five interventions, currently or potentially included in the National Malaria Strategic Plan, individually and in combination. The simulated prevalences were fitted to council specific prevalences derived from geostatistical models to obtain council specific predictions of the prevalence and number of cases between 2017 and 2020. The predictions were used to evaluate in silico the feasibility of the national target of reaching a prevalence of below 1% by 2020, and to suggest alternative intervention stratifications for the country. RESULTS: The historical prevalence trend was fitted for each council with an agreement of 87% in 2016 (95%CI: 0.84-0.90) and an agreement of 90% for the historical trend (2003-2016) (95%CI: 0.87-0.93) The current national malaria strategy was expected to reduce the malaria prevalence between 2016 and 2020 on average by 23.8% (95% CI: 19.7%-27.9%) if current case management levels were maintained, and by 52.1% (95% CI: 48.8%-55.3%) if the case management were improved. Insecticide treated nets and case management were the most cost-effective interventions, expected to reduce the prevalence by 25.0% (95% CI: 19.7%-30.2) and to avert 37 million cases between 2017 and 2020. Mass drug administration was included in most councils in the stratification selected for meeting the national target at minimal costs, expected to reduce the prevalence by 77.5% (95%CI: 70.5%-84.5%) and to avert 102 million cases, with almost twice higher costs than those of the current national strategy. In summary, the model suggested that current interventions are not sufficient to reach the national aim of a prevalence of less than 1% by 2020 and a revised strategic plan needs to consider additional, more effective interventions, especially in high transmission areas and that the targets need to be revisited. CONCLUSION: The methodology reported here is based on intensive interactions with the NMCP and provides a helpful tool for assessing the feasibility of country specific targets and for determining which intervention stratifications at sub-national level will have most impact. This country-led application could support strategic planning of malaria control in many other malaria endemic countries.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Simulação por Computador , Malária/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Planejamento Estratégico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Organizações de Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Organizações de Planejamento em Saúde/normas , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Malária/economia , Malária/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/normas , Controle de Mosquitos/economia , Controle de Mosquitos/métodos , Controle de Mosquitos/organização & administração , Controle de Mosquitos/normas , Parasitemia/economia , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Prevalência , Instituições Acadêmicas/economia , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Planejamento Estratégico/economia , Planejamento Estratégico/normas , Tanzânia/epidemiologia
11.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(12): e0007924, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31841516

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trachoma is a contagious infection of the eye by specific strains of the bacteria Chlamydia trachomatis. It is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is a cornerstone of World Health Organization (WHO)'s global effort to eliminate trachoma by 2020. This coverage survey was aimed to assess trachoma post-mass drug administration (MDA) coverage among six selected districts of East Wollega, Horo Guduru Wollega, and West Shewa zones in2017. METHODS: A community based cross-sectional coverage survey was conducted. The sample size was calculated automatically using Coverage Survey Builder (CSB) tool in microsoft excel. Thirty segments were selected per each selected districts of the three zones. A separate Results Entry Form for each district surveyed was completed, saved and uploaded directly into the online Coverage Survey Analysis Tool to estimate the surveycoverage and the program reach along with the corresponding 95% confidence limits and design effects. EPI-INFO 7.0 and SPSS version 20 was used for further analysis of survey data. RESULT: A total of 1,747 households were surveyed, out of which 10,700 individuals were interviewed. Most respondents (95.1%) stated that they heard about trachoma MDA and most of them replied that they got the information from health workers. Program reach ranged between 89.5% in Jimma Geneti district and 94.8% in Dirre Hinchini district. The most common mentioned reasons for not having taken azithromycin included not knowing about the campaign, fear of side effects and being absent during the MDA campaign. CONCLUSION: In this survey, four of the six districts met the target threshold (i.e. 80%) for effective coverage; Ambo rural and Jimma Geneti did not meet the target threshold.Therefore, programmatic improvements should be made for the future campaign to reach the expected thresholds while the campaign in four of the six districts should be encouraged.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Tracoma/tratamento farmacológico , Tracoma/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 685, 2019 Oct 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31590663

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is endemic in the uMkhanyakude district of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The South Africa Department of Health (DoH) has decided to implement a schistosomiasis preventive mass drug administration program in all affected parts of the country. Quality management is part of the strategic objectives of the treatment program. We conducted a risk assessment and developed guidelines for the quality management of a schistosomiasis preventive treatment program for children aged 5 years and below in the uMkhanyakude District of KwaZulu-Natal. METHODS: We conducted a scenario planning exercise by interviewing 10 child health experts from the uMkhanyakude Health District to establish potential risks associated with a planned schistosomiasis preventive control treatment program for children aged 5 years old and below. The risks were analyzed using a modified Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). An FMEA table was produced to guide the quality management of the planned schistosomiasis preventive control treatment program for children aged 5 years and below in the uMkhanyakude Health District. RESULTS: We identified potential risks, failure modes and possible failure corrective/preventive measures in the following activities that would be part of the mass treatment of children aged 5 years and below infected with schistosomiasis in the uMkhanyakude District. These included enrolment of children into the treatment program; general health checks; weight and height measurements; administration of drugs; reporting of side effects and monitoring and evaluation. CONCLUSION: We were able to use FMEA guide quality management and identify potential risks associated with the planned schistosomiasis preventive treatment program for children aged 5 years old and below in the uMkhanyakude District of KwaZulu-Natal. The FMEA for this program will be useful to the quality management of schistosomiasis preventive treatment programs for this age group in other similar settings.


Assuntos
Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Esquistossomose/prevenção & controle , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , África do Sul/epidemiologia
13.
Malar J ; 18(1): 255, 2019 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31357997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malaria transmission is high in western Kenya and the asymptomatic infected population plays a significant role in driving the transmission. Mathematical modelling and simulation programs suggest that interventions targeting asymptomatic infections through mass testing and treatment (MTaT) or mass drug administration (MDA) have the potential to reduce malaria transmission when combined with existing interventions. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the study site, capacity development efforts required, and lessons learned for implementing a multi-year community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of MTaT for malaria transmission reduction in an area of high transmission in western Kenya. METHODS: The study partnered with Kenya's Ministry of Health (MOH) and other organizations on community sensitization and engagement to mobilize, train and deploy community health volunteers (CHVs) to deliver MTaT in the community. Within the health facilities, the study availed staff, medical and laboratory supplies and strengthened health information management system to monitor progress and evaluate impact of intervention. RESULTS: More than 80 Kenya MOH CHVs, 13 clinical officers, field workers, data and logistical staff were trained to carry out MTaT three times a year for 2 years in a population of approximately 90,000 individuals. A supply chain management was adapted to meet daily demands for large volumes of commodities despite the limitation of few MOH facilities having ideal storage conditions. Modern technology was adapted more to meet the needs of the high daily volume of collected data. CONCLUSIONS: In resource-constrained settings, large interventions require capacity building and logistical planning. This study found that investing in relationships with the communities, local governments, and other partners, and identifying and equipping the appropriate staff with the skills and technology to perform tasks are important factors for success in delivering an intervention like MTaT.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Participação da Comunidade/métodos , Malária/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Quênia , Voluntários/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Soc Sci Med ; 228: 51-59, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30875544

RESUMO

Recent global commitments to shift responsibility for Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) control to affected countries reflect a renewed emphasis on sustainability, away from aid-dependency. This calls for a better understanding of how domestic stakeholders perceive investments in different strategies for NTD control. Soil transmitted helminths (STH) are among the NTDs targeted for elimination as a public health problem by international agencies through mass drug administration, provided periodically to at-risk population groups, often using drugs donated by pharmaceutical companies. This study was conducted in Kenya at a time when responsibilities for long running STH programmes were transitioning from external to national and sub-national agencies. Following an initial assessment in which we identified key domestic stakeholders and reviewed relevant scientific and government documents, the perspectives of stakeholders working in health, education, community engagement and sanitation were investigated through semi-structured interviews with national level policymakers, county level policymakers, and frontline implementers in one high-STH burden county, Kwale. Our conceptual framework on sustainability traced a progression in thinking, from ensuring financial stability through the technical ability to adapt to changing circumstances, and ultimately to a situation where a programme is prioritised by domestic policymakers because empowered communities demand it. It was clear from our interviews that most Kenyan stakeholders sought to be at the final stage in this progression. Interviewees criticised long-term investment in mass drug administration, the approach favoured predominantly by external agencies, for failing to address underlying causes of STH. Instead they identified three synergistic priority areas for investment: changes in institutional structures and culture to reduce working in silos; building community demand and ownership; and increased policymaker engagement on underlying socioeconomic and environmental causes of STH. Although challenging to implement, the shift in responsibility from external agencies to domestic stakeholders may lead to emergence of new strategic directions.


Assuntos
Pessoal Administrativo/psicologia , Solo/parasitologia , Desenvolvimento Sustentável/tendências , Pessoal Administrativo/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Helmintos/efeitos dos fármacos , Helmintos/parasitologia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/economia , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Doenças Negligenciadas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Negligenciadas/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Desenvolvimento Sustentável/economia
15.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(3): e0007077, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30856166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Seasonal epidemics of bacterial meningitis in the African Meningitis Belt carry a high burden of disease and mortality. Reactive mass vaccination is used as a control measure during epidemics, but the time taken to gain immunity from the vaccine reduces the flexibility and effectiveness of these campaigns. Targeted reactive antibiotic prophylaxis could be used to supplement reactive mass vaccination and further reduce the incidence of meningitis, and the potential effectiveness and efficiency of these strategies should be explored. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from an outbreak of meningococcal meningitis in Niger, caused primarily by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C, is used to estimate clustering of meningitis cases at the household and village level. In addition, reactive antibiotic prophylaxis and reactive vaccination strategies are simulated to estimate their potential effectiveness and efficiency, with a focus on the threshold and spatial unit used to declare an epidemic and initiate the intervention. There is village-level clustering of suspected meningitis cases after an epidemic has been declared in a health area. Risk of suspected meningitis among household contacts of a suspected meningitis case is no higher than among members of the same village. Village-wide antibiotic prophylaxis can target subsequent cases in villages: across of range of parameters pertaining to how the intervention is performed, up to 220/672 suspected cases during the season are potentially preventable. On the other hand, household prophylaxis targets very few cases. In general, the village-wide strategy is not very sensitive to the method used to declare an epidemic. Finally, village-wide antibiotic prophylaxis is potentially more efficient than mass vaccination of all individuals at the beginning of the season, and than the equivalent reactive vaccination strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Village-wide antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered and tested further as a response against outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis in the Meningitis Belt, as a supplement to reactive mass vaccination.


Assuntos
Quimioprevenção/métodos , Surtos de Doenças , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Meningite Meningocócica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Simulação por Computador , Feminino , Administração de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Meningite Meningocócica/microbiologia , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo C/isolamento & purificação , Níger/epidemiologia , População Rural , Adulto Jovem
16.
Health Educ Res ; 34(3): 300-309, 2019 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30805648

RESUMO

Lymphatic filariasis (LF), a neglected tropical disease is targeted for elimination globally by 2020. National Health Policy of India set the goal by 2017 and annual single-dose mass drug administration (MDA) with anti-filarial drugs is in operation in endemic districts since 2004. Performance and effectiveness of MDA was diverse across the nation and prevalence of infection continues above threshold level in 50% of endemic districts which requires alternative strategies. National programme aims at achieving >65% consumption for transmission control. Post 10 rounds of MDA in an endemic district of Kerala state, a three-arm study identified determinants in gap in outreach and consumption, based on which context-dependent intervention using social group work and networking (SGWN) was implemented and impact assessed. A spill over effect with overall increase in coverage and consumption rates irrespective of arms apparently is due to inclusive improvement in MDA programme whereas, significant relative improvement in intervention arm reflects effectiveness of SGWN strategy. Though reduction in microfilaria prevalence in all arms was observed, it was significant between intervention and comparison arm. This study highlights need for context-dependent communication strategy to improve MDA for accelerating LF elimination by the targeted 2020.


Assuntos
Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Esquema de Medicação , Doenças Endêmicas , Filaricidas/administração & dosagem , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Rede Social
17.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 12(4): e0006328, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29649260

RESUMO

AUTHOR SUMMARY: Designing and implementing effective programs for infectious disease control requires complex decision-making, informed by an understanding of the diseases, the types of disease interventions and control measures available, and the disease-relevant characteristics of the local community. Though disease modeling frameworks have been developed to address these questions and support decision-making, the complexity of current models presents a significant barrier to on-the-ground end users. The picture is further complicated when considering approaches for integration of different disease control programs, where co-infection dynamics, treatment interactions, and other variables must also be taken into account. Here, we describe the development of an application available on the internet with a simple user interface, to support on-the-ground decision-making for integrating disease control, given local conditions and practical constraints. The model upon which the tool is built provides predictive analysis for the effectiveness of integration of schistosomiasis and malaria control, two diseases with extensive geographical and epidemiological overlap. This proof-of-concept method and tool demonstrate significant progress in effectively translating the best available scientific models to support pragmatic decision-making on the ground, with the potential to significantly increase the impact and cost-effectiveness of disease control.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Esquistossomose/tratamento farmacológico , Interface Usuário-Computador , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Integração Comunitária/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Modelos Teóricos , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Estações do Ano
18.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 12(1): e0006166, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29346377

RESUMO

Current control strategies for soil-transmitted helminths (STH) emphasize morbidity control through mass drug administration (MDA) targeting preschool- and school-age children, women of childbearing age and adults in certain high-risk occupations such as agricultural laborers or miners. This strategy is effective at reducing morbidity in those treated but, without massive economic development, it is unlikely it will interrupt transmission. MDA will therefore need to continue indefinitely to maintain benefit. Mathematical models suggest that transmission interruption may be achievable through MDA alone, provided that all age groups are targeted with high coverage. The DeWorm3 Project will test the feasibility of interrupting STH transmission using biannual MDA targeting all age groups. Study sites (population ≥80,000) have been identified in Benin, Malawi and India. Each site will be divided into 40 clusters, to be randomized 1:1 to three years of twice-annual community-wide MDA or standard-of-care MDA, typically annual school-based deworming. Community-wide MDA will be delivered door-to-door, while standard-of-care MDA will be delivered according to national guidelines. The primary outcome is transmission interruption of the STH species present at each site, defined as weighted cluster-level prevalence ≤2% by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), 24 months after the final round of MDA. Secondary outcomes include the endline prevalence of STH, overall and by species, and the endline prevalence of STH among children under five as an indicator of incident infections. Secondary analyses will identify cluster-level factors associated with transmission interruption. Prevalence will be assessed using qPCR of stool samples collected from a random sample of cluster residents at baseline, six months after the final round of MDA and 24 months post-MDA. A smaller number of individuals in each cluster will be followed with annual sampling to monitor trends in prevalence and reinfection throughout the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03014167.


Assuntos
Anti-Helmínticos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos Clínicos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Helmintíase/tratamento farmacológico , Helmintíase/prevenção & controle , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos/métodos , Benin , Fezes/parasitologia , Helmintíase/transmissão , Humanos , Índia , Malaui , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA