Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Heart J ; 236: 22-36, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636136

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Individuals with congenital heart defects (CHDs) are recommended to receive all inpatient cardiac and noncardiac care at facilities that can offer specialized care. We describe geographic accessibility to such centers in New York State and determine several factors associated with receiving care there. METHODS: We used inpatient hospitalization data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) in New York State 2008-2013. In the absence of specific adult CHD care center designations during our study period, we identified pediatric/adult and adult-only cardiac surgery centers through the Cardiac Surgery Reporting System to estimate age-based specialized care. We calculated one-way drive and public transit time (in minutes) from residential address to centers using R gmapsdistance package and the Google Maps Distance Application Programming Interface (API). We calculated prevalence ratios using modified Poisson regression with model-based standard errors, fit with generalized estimating equations clustered at the hospital level and subclustered at the individual level. RESULTS: Individuals with CHDs were more likely to seek care at pediatric/adult or adult-only cardiac surgery centers if they had severe CHDs, private health insurance, higher severity of illness at encounter, a surgical procedure, cardiac encounter, and shorter drive time. These findings can be used to increase care receipt (especially for noncardiac care) at pediatric/adult or adult-only cardiac surgery centers, identify areas with limited access, and reduce disparities in access to specialized care among this high-risk population.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , New York/epidemiologia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Risco Ajustado/organização & administração , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Urology ; 153: 93-100, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524433

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of socioeconomic parameters on urinary stone surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing urolithiasis surgery in our community network hospital in North Carolina from 2005-2018. RESULTS: Of 7731 patients, 2160 (28%), 5,174 (67%), and 397 (5%) underwent SWL, URS, and PCNL, respectively. A higher proportion of Whites underwent URS (67%) and SWL (74%) than PCNL (56%); whereas a larger percentage of Blacks underwent PCNL (24%) than URS (20%) and SWL (15%) groups (P <.001). Private insurance payers were greater in the SWL (95%) group than URS (80%) and PCNL (81%) (P <.001). The distribution of median income was significantly different amongst the 3 surgeries with higher income classes overutilizing SWL and underutilizing PCNL compared to lower income classes (P <.001). In linear regression modeling, the proportion of SWL in a postal code was positively associated with median income (R2=0.55, P <.001); URS and PCNL were negatively associated with median income (R2=0.40, P <.001 and R2=0.41, P <.001, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression modeling, Blacks were significantly more likely to undergo PCNL than Whites (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.74 P <.050). Private insurance payers were more likely to undergo SWL (aOR 11.0, 95% CI 7.26-16.8, P <.0001) than public insurance payers. Patients in higher median income brackets are significantly less likely to undergo PCNL than those in the <$40,000 income bracket (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that socioeconomic status impacts urolithiasis surgical management, underscoring disparity recognition importance in endourologic care and ensuring appropriate surgical care regardless of socioeconomic status.


Assuntos
Litotripsia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Saúde da População Urbana , Urolitíase , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , Demografia , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Litotripsia/métodos , Litotripsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Saúde da População Urbana/etnologia , Saúde da População Urbana/normas , Saúde da População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Urolitíase/epidemiologia , Urolitíase/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg ; 11(6): 689-696, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844725

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic currently gripping the globe is impacting the entire health care system with rapidly escalating morbidities and mortality. Although the infectious risk to the pediatric population appears low, the effects on children with congenital heart disease (CHD) remain poorly understood. The closure of congenital heart surgery programs worldwide to address the growing number of infected individuals could have an unintended impact on future health for COVID-19-negative patients with CHD. Pediatric and congenital heart surgeons, given their small numbers and close relationships, are uniquely positioned to collectively assess the impact of the pandemic on surgical practice and care of children with CHD. We present the results of an international survey sent to pediatric and congenital heart surgeons characterizing the early impact of COVID-19 on the care of patients with CHD.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Administração Hospitalar , Pandemias , Criança , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Global , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
BMC Fam Pract ; 21(1): 108, 2020 06 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32532206

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treating hypertensive patients by integrating the patient-centered approach would influence the practice and outcome of treatment. Our purpose was to determine whether the implementation of a patient-centered approach in health care delivery can improve adhering to guidelines and the quality-of-care. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using secondary data from the electronic medical records of the patients treated in the two primary care outpatient settings at the Family Medicine (FM) and Social Security (SS) clinics. A key feature of the FM clinic is the incorporation of a patient-centered approach in its service delivery. Individual information regarding initial assessment and treatment at the follow-up visits was reviewed for 1 year. Comparison of adherence to treatment guidelines between the two primary care clinics was performed by using chi-square, Fisher's exact test or a t-test. To explore the difference in blood pressure and BP control between the two clinics, linear and logistic regression analysis respectively were performed with an adjustment for CV risk score in 2016 as a key confounder. RESULTS: The evidence included 100 records from each clinic, showed variation between the two primary care sites. The FM clinic had more complete records regarding family history of hypertension, assessment for secondary causes, prescription for lifestyle modification and appropriate adjustment of medication. Higher levels of blood pressure control were recorded in the FM clinic, specifically systolic pressure 2.92 mmHg (p = 0.073) and diastolic pressure 5.38 mmHg (p <  0.001) lower than those recorded in the SS clinic. There was a 2.96 times higher chance for BP goals to be achieved in patients in receipt of hypertensive care at the FM clinic (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a patient-centered approach in service delivery could improve the quality of care for hypertension patients in primary care in Thailand.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/terapia , Masculino , Anamnese/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/normas , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tailândia/epidemiologia
5.
BMC Fam Pract ; 21(1): 98, 2020 05 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32475339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary care serves all age groups and individuals with health states ranging from those with no chronic conditions to those who are medically complex, or frail and approaching the end of life. For information to be actionable and guide planning, there must be some population disaggregation based on differences in expected needs for care. Promising approaches to segmentation in primary care reflect both the breadth and severity of health states, the types and amounts of health care utilization that are expected, and the roles of the primary care provider. The purpose of this study was to assess population segmentation as a tool to create distinct patient groups for use in primary care performance reporting. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used administrative data (patient characteristics, physician and hospital billings, prescription medicines data, emergency department visits) to classify the population of British Columbia (BC), Canada into one of four population segments: low need, multiple morbidities, medically complex, and frail. Each segment was further classified using socioeconomic status (SES) as a proxy for patient vulnerability. Regression analyses were used to examine predictors of health care use, costs and selected measures of primary care attributes (access, continuity, coordination) by segment. RESULTS: Average annual health care costs increased from the low need ($ 1460) to frail segment ($10,798). Differences in primary care cost by segment only emerged when attributes of primary care were included in regression models: accessing primary care outside business hours and discontinuous primary care (≥5 different GP's in a given year) were associated with higher health care costs across all segments and higher continuity of care was associated with lower costs in the frail segment (cost ratio = 0.61). Additionally, low SES was associated with higher costs across all segments, but the difference was largest in the medically complex group (cost ratio = 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Population segments based on expected need for care can support primary care measurement and reporting by identifying nuances which may be lost when all patients are grouped together. Our findings demonstrate that variables such as SES and use of regression analyses can further enhance the usefulness of segments for performance measurement and reporting.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades/organização & administração , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Gestão de Riscos
6.
Adv Ther ; 37(5): 2344-2355, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32297282

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In Brazil, current data on the use of healthcare resources to manage individuals with overactive bladder (OAB) are lacking. This study aimed to characterize contemporary treatment and the economic burden among patients with OAB managed under the Brazilian public health system (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS]). METHODS: Population-based data from January to December of 2015 were acquired from Brazil's public health database. Adults at least 18 years of age with an ICD-10 diagnostic code for OAB within the period were included. Records of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and onabotulinumtoxinA injections were used to calculate estimates of resource use and costs (in Brazilian reals [R$]) among those with OAB (frequency [%] and mean (standard deviation [SD]) as appropriate). Patient identifiers were not available, so a record linkage methodology was used to match medical encounters to individuals. Pharmacologic management of OAB was informed by government medication purchases available from the official Brazilian government databases. RESULTS: During 2015, 26,640 patients with OAB were identified. All cohort members had at least one outpatient visit and 15,349 (57.6%) were hospitalized. Of the study cohort, 10.0% visited a general practitioner (GP), 41.3% visited a specialist, and 52.0% visited other non-medical healthcare practitioners within the year. Mean (SD) healthcare costs among the study cohort totaled R$355 (R$866) per patient per year; and were R$291 (R$654), R$27 (R$130), R$27 (R$30), and R$11 (R$17) for hospitalizations, GP, specialist, and non-medical healthcare practitioner visits per patient per year, respectively. Regional analysis of reported government medication purchases suggested that access to OAB treatments is highly limited. CONCLUSIONS: High resource use and costs were estimated among patients with OAB managed within the SUS. These data provide a snapshot of the management of patients with OAB in Brazil, with the patients seeking treatment under SUS likely representing a more burdened subpopulation.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/economia , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/epidemiologia , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/terapia
7.
Injury ; 51(2): 136-141, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Injuries remain an important public health concern, resulting in considerable annual morbidity and mortality. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the lack of appropriate infrastructure, equipment and skilled personnel compound the burden of injury, leading to higher mortality rates. As Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses remain uneconomical and inappropriate in LMICs, the Primary Trauma Care (PTC) course was introduced to provide an alternative that is both sustainable and appropriate to local resources. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in May 2019, utilising MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. All studies reporting patient related outcomes (mortality and morbidity rates) and course participant related outcomes (knowledge, confidence and skills) in LMICs were included. PRISMA guidelines were adhered to throughout. RESULTS: Nine observational studies were identified (Level 3 evidence). Six studies reported improved knowledge in injury management post-PTC course (p < 0.05). Two studies reported improvements in confidence (p < 0.05) and one on skill attainment (p < 0.0001). One study reported a reduction in mortality rates post-PTC course (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Departmental, institutional and personal improvements may occur in clinical practice as a result of formal PTC training of trauma team members in LMICs. Further high-quality research is needed to evaluate this course's effects on observed change in clinical practice and patient outcomes. This may require long-term observational and epidemiological studies to assess improvements in morbidity and mortality. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42019133986.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatologia/educação , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Cuidados de Suporte Avançado de Vida no Trauma/economia , Cuidados de Suporte Avançado de Vida no Trauma/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Currículo/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade
8.
Am J Manag Care ; 25(12): e395-e402, 2019 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31860234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify care needs among Medicaid and Medicare patients in an all-condition care management program involving case managers (CMs) and community health workers (CHWs), and to examine the relationship between intervention intensity and healthcare utilization. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal evaluation of managed care-hired CMs and CHWs based at 8 primary care sites participating in the Johns Hopkins Community Health Partnership (J-CHiP). METHODS: Patients at high risk for hospitalization were enrolled in J-CHiP. CMs provided care coordination and CHWs addressed barriers to care. Four program intensity categories were created: low CM-low CHW, low CM-high CHW, high CM-low CHW, and high CM-high CHW. We evaluated the adjusted relative risk (RR) of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and 30-day hospital readmissions pre- and post enrollment in the program using CM documentation, electronic health record data, and insurance claims. RESULTS: Among 1408 Medicaid and 2196 Medicare patients, the predominant barriers to care were lack of transportation, unstable housing, medication payment, and healthy food access. Among Medicaid and Medicare patients, high CM-high CHW and high CM-low CHW intensities were associated with a higher adjusted risk of hospitalization and 30-day hospital readmission after program implementation compared with low CM-low CHW intensity. Among patients with low CM-high CHW intensity, Medicaid patients had a higher risk of readmission (RR, 1.47; P = .016) and Medicare patients had a higher risk of ED visit (RR, 1.33; P = .001) post program implementation. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal evaluation of an all-condition, unstructured, managed care organization-led program, preprogram trajectories of healthcare utilization rates among patients increased rather than decreased after program implementation, especially among patients receiving the highest care management program intensity.


Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
Am J Manag Care ; 25(6): e173-e178, 2019 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31211549

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether a care transitions program, Bridges, differentially reduced rehospitalizations among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on insurance status and zip code poverty level. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort. METHODS: We examined data from a single health system in Delaware, collected as part of a care transitions program for patients who underwent PCI from 2012 to 2015 compared with an unmatched historical control cohort from 2010 to 2011. Socioeconomic status was assessed by insurance status and zip code-level poverty data. Patients were divided into tertiles based on the proportion of their zip code of residence living under 100% of the federal poverty level. Rehospitalization rates were analyzed by negative binomial regression and included interaction terms to examine differential effects of Bridges by insurance and poverty level. RESULTS: There were 4638 patients representing 5710 hospitalizations: 3212 in the historical control and 2498 in the Bridges cohort. Among patients with Medicaid who received the Bridges intervention, those living in the wealthiest zip codes were 15.5% less likely to be rehospitalized than patients with Medicare and 9.4% less likely than patients with commercial insurance (P = .04). However, patients with Medicaid who lived in the poorest zip codes and those with dual Medicare/Medicaid status had higher rates of rehospitalization post intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The Bridges intervention was associated with improved rehospitalization rates for Medicaid patients compared with those with Medicare or commercial insurance within Delaware's wealthier communities. Care transitions programs may differentially affect Medicaid patients based on the wealth of the communities in which they reside.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Delaware , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Estados Unidos
10.
BMJ Open ; 9(3): e024726, 2019 03 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928936

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether decentralising colposcopy services to a primary care facility in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa raises access to colposcopy. DESIGN: Before-after study comparing 2 years before and 2 years after decentralisation, using clinical records and laboratory data on cervical cytology and histology. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The proportion of all women attending Hillbrow Community Health Centre (HCHC) with an abnormal Papanikolaou (Pap) smear who had a colposcopy post-decentralisation. SETTING: Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) has provided colposcopy services for several decades. HCHC, located about 3 km away, began colposcopy services in 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Women, aged above 18 years, who had a colposcopy for diagnosis and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions following a Pap smear, from 2012 to 2016 at CMJAH or HCHC. RESULTS: Pre-decentralisation at CMJAH, 910 women had colposcopy (2012-2014). Post-decentralisation (2014-2016), 721 had colposcopy at CMJAH and 399 at HCHC, the decentralised facility. The number who had a Pap smear at HCHC and then a colposcopy rose threefold post-decentralisation (114 vs 350). Post-decentralisation, 43 women at HCHC were referred to CMJAH for colposcopy, compared with 114 pre-decentralisation. Post-decentralisation, 47.3% of women at CMJAH waited >6 months for colposcopy, while 35.5% did at HCHC (p<0.001). Across all three groups, 26.9%-30.3% of women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III lesions or carcinoma on colposcopy. The proportion of invalid specimens was similar at CMJAH and HCHC (1.8%-2.8%). Of 401 women who had an abnormal Pap smear at HCHC post-decentralisation, 267 had colposcopy (66.6%). CONCLUSION: Decentralisation can decrease the time to colposcopy and reduce the workload of tertiary hospitals. Overall, more women accessed services. Colposcopy coverage at HCHC is higher than other sites, but could be further improved. Decentralisation did not appear to undermine the quality of services and this model could be extended to similar settings in South Africa and elsewhere.


Assuntos
Colposcopia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Colposcopia/métodos , Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
11.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 72, 2019 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30823871

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) based chronic kidney disease (CKD) registries are central to population health strategies to improve CKD care. In 2015, Partners Healthcare System (PHS), encompassing multiple academic and community hospitals and outpatient care facilities in Massachusetts, developed an EHR-based CKD registry to identify opportunities for quality improvement, defined as improvement on both process measures and outcomes measures associated with clinical care. METHODS: Patients are included in the registry based on the following criteria: 1) two estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) results < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 separated by 90 days, including the most recent eGFR being < 60 ml/min/1.73m2; or 2) the most recent two urine protein values > 300 mg protein/g creatinine on either urine total protein/creatinine ratio or urine albumin/creatinine ratio; or 3) an EHR problem list diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD). The registry categorizes patients by CKD stage and includes rates of annual testing for eGFR and proteinuria, blood pressure control, use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), nephrotoxic medication use, hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization, vascular access placement, transplant status, CKD progression risk; number of outpatient nephrology visits, and hospitalizations. RESULTS: The CKD registry includes 60,503 patients and has revealed several opportunities for care improvement including 1) annual proteinuria testing performed for 17% (stage 3) and 31% (stage 4) of patients; 2) ACE-I/ARB used in 41% (stage 3) and 46% (stage 4) of patients; 3) nephrotoxic medications used among 23% of stage 4 patients; and 4) 89% of stage 4 patients lack HBV immunity. For advanced CKD patients there are opportunities to improve vascular access placement, transplant referrals and outpatient nephrology contact. CONCLUSIONS: A CKD registry can identify modifiable care gaps across the spectrum of CKD care and enable population health strategy implementation. No linkage to Social Security Death Master File or US Renal Data System (USRDS) databases limits our ability to track mortality and progression to ESRD.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Idoso , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal/métodos , Testes de Função Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidade do Paciente , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão da Saúde da População , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia
12.
J Oncol Pract ; 15(2): e110-e121, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550373

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To improve care coordination for complex cancers, it is critical to establish a more nuanced understanding of the types of providers involved. As the number of provider types increases, strategies to support cancer care coordination must adapt to a greater variety of information needs, communication styles, and treatment strategies. METHODS: We categorized providers into 11 types, using National Provider Identifier specialties. Using Medicare claims, we counted the number of unique combinations of provider types billed during preoperative, operative, and postdischarge care for colon cancer surgery and assessed how this count varies across hospitals. The study included 70,567 beneficiaries in fee-for-service Medicare A and B for 6 months before and 60 days after an admission for colectomy for colon cancer between 2008 and 2011. RESULTS: We observed 1,554 preoperative provider-type combinations, 975 operative combinations, and 1,571 postdischarge combinations. The three most common combinations in the preoperative phase were general medicine only, other medical specialists only, and general medicine and other medical specialists. In the operative phase, the three most common combinations were primary surgery, anesthesiology, and pathology; general medicine, other medical specialists, radiology, primary surgery, anesthesiology, and pathology; and other medical specialists, radiology, primary surgery, anesthesiology, and pathology. In the postdischarge phase, the three most common combinations were general medicine, general medicine and other medical specialists, and general medicine and oncology. On average, each hospital had 15 preoperative, 11 operative, and 15 postoperative combinations. High-volume, larger, teaching, urban, and noncritical access hospitals had more combinations in all phases. CONCLUSION: Many provider-type combinations are involved in colon cancer surgery care. Substantial variation exists across hospitals types, suggesting that certain hospitals need additional resources and more flexible infrastructure to coordinate care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/epidemiologia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Medicare , Modelos Teóricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
Angiol Sosud Khir ; 24(4): 11-17, 2018.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531764

RESUMO

The article deals with the analysis of retrospective and prospective studies dedicated to examining patient safety regarding epidemiology, frequency and severity of adverse events associated with rendering medical care. Electronic retrieval was carried out over the period from 1990 to 2017 using the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Collaboration, EMBASE, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Science. The carried out meta-analysis made it possible to determine that cases of doing harm (adverse events) while rendering medical care are registered in 10.6% of patients. More than 80% of adverse events occur in hospital, with more than half of them revealed in the operating room and about third in a patient ward. While rendering medical care outside hospital, more often cases of doing harm are observed due to medical errors made in the physician's office and due to the patient's behaviour at home. The majority of adverse events appeared to be associated with performing an operation, manipulation, carrying out drug therapy, late or inappropriate treatment and diagnosis. Unexpected death secondary to unfavourable events is observed in 5.3% of patients. In the structure of in-hospital mortality, the proportion of deaths associated with rendering medical care accounts for 24.9% and in the structure of overall population mortality - for 9.7%, ranking third amongst all causes.


Assuntos
Erros Médicos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Humanos , Erros Médicos/classificação , Erros Médicos/mortalidade , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Mortalidade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos
14.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 44(12): 731-740, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30064959

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health centers provide care to vulnerable and high-need populations. Recent investments have promoted use of health information technology (HIT) capabilities for improving care coordination and quality of care in health centers. This study examined factors associated with use of these HIT capabilities and the association between these capabilities and quality of care in a census of health centers in the United States. METHODS: Cross-sectional secondary data from the 2015 Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System was used to examine 6 measures of HIT capability related to care coordination and clinical decision support and 16 measures of quality (12 process measures, 3 outcome measures, 1 composite measure) for health centers in the United States. Adjusted logistic regressions were used to examine health center characteristics associated with use of HIT capabilities, and adjusted linear regressions were used to examine associations between HIT capabilities and quality of care. RESULTS: Many health centers reported using HIT for care coordination activities, including coordinating enabling services (67.3%) or engaging patients (81.0%). Health center size and medical home recognition were associated with significantly greater odds of using HIT for enabling services and engaging patients. These HIT capabilities were associated with higher overall quality and higher rates of six process measures (adult screening and maternal and child health) and hemoglobin A1c control. CONCLUSION: Use of HIT for such activities as arranging enabling services and engaging patients are underleveraged tools for care coordination. There may be opportunities to further improve quality of care for vulnerable patients by promoting health centers' use of these HIT capabilities.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/organização & administração , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Estudos Transversais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Características de Residência , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
15.
Am J Med ; 131(10): 1187-1199.e5, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29906429

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of cancer upon a patient's net worth and debt in the US. METHODS: This longitudinal study used the Health and Retirement Study from 1998-2014. Persons ≥50years with newly-diagnosed malignancies were included, excluding minor skin cancers. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed changes in net worth and debt (consumer, mortgage, home equity) at 2 and 4 years after diagnosis (year+2, year+4), controlling for demographic and clinically-related variables, cancer-specific attributes, economic factors, and mortality. A 2-year period before cancer diagnosis served as a historical control. RESULTS: Across 9.5 million estimated new diagnoses of cancer from 2000-2012, individuals averaged 68.6±9.4 years with slight majorities being married (54.7%), not retired (51.1%), and Medicare beneficiaries (56.6%). At year+2, 42.4% depleted their entire life's assets, with higher adjusted odds associated with worsening cancer, requirement of continued treatment, demographic and socioeconomic factors (ie, female, Medicaid, uninsured, retired, increasing age, income, and household size), and clinical characteristics (ie, current smoker, worse self-reported health, hypertension, diabetes, lung disease) (P<.05); average losses were $92,098. At year+4, financial insolvency extended to 38.2%, with several consistent socioeconomic, cancer-related, and clinical characteristics remaining significant predictors of complete asset depletion. CONCLUSIONS: This nationally-representative investigation of an initially-estimated 9.5 million newly-diagnosed persons with cancer who were ≥50 years of age found a substantial proportion incurring financial toxicity. As large financial burdens have been found to adversely affect access to care and outcomes among cancer patients, the active development of approaches to mitigate these effects among already vulnerable groups remains of key importance.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Declarações Financeiras/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/classificação , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Heart ; 104(17): 1424-1431, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29453329

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ischaemic heart disease is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in Sri Lanka. Acute Coronary Syndrome Sri Lanka Audit Project (ACSSLAP) is the first national clinical-audit project that evaluated patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and care provided by state-sector hospitals. METHODS: ACSSLAP prospectively evaluated acute care, in-hospital care and discharge plans provided by all state-sector hospitals managing patients with ACS. Data were collected from 30 consecutive patients from each hospital during 2-4 weeks window. Local and international recommendations were used as audit standards. RESULTS: Data from 87/98 (88.7%) hospitals recruited 2177 patients, with 2116 confirmed as having ACS. Mean age was 61.4±11.8 years (range 20-95) and 58.7% (n=1242) were males. There were 813 (38.4%) patients with unstable angina, 695 (32.8%) with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 608 (28.7%) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Both STEMI (69.9%) and NSTEMI (61.4%) were more in males (P<0.001). Aspirin, clopidogrel and statins were given to over 90% in acute setting and on discharge. In STEMI, 407 (66.9%) were reperfused; 384 (63.2%) were given fibrinolytics and only 23 (3.8%) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Only 42.3 % had thrombolysis in <30 min and 62.5% had PCI in <90 min. On discharge, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers were given to only 50.7% and 69.2%, respectively and only 17.6% had coronary interventions planned. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS, aspirin, clopidogrel and statin use met audit standards in acute setting and on discharge. Vast majority of patients with STEMI underwent fibrinolyisis than PCI, due to limited resources. Primary PCI, planned coronary interventions and timely thrombolysis need improvement in Sri Lanka.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Trombolítica/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/classificação , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Sri Lanka/epidemiologia , Tempo para o Tratamento
17.
Eur Urol ; 73(4): 491-498, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer treatment is a significant source of morbidity and spending. Some men with prostate cancer, particularly those with significant health problems, are unlikely to benefit from treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess relationships between financial incentives associated with urologist ownership of radiation facilities and treatment for prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2012. Patients were further classified by their risk of dying from noncancer causes in the 10 yr following their cancer diagnosis by using a mortality model derived from comparable patients known to be cancer-free. INTERVENTION: Urologists were categorized by their practice affiliation (single-specialty groups by size, multispecialty group) and ownership of a radiation facility. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS: Use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and use of any treatment within 1 yr of diagnosis. Generalized estimating equations were used to adjust for patient differences. RESULTS: Among men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, use of IMRT ranged from 24% in multispecialty groups to 37% in large urology groups (p<0.001). Patients managed in groups with IMRT ownership (n=5133) were more likely to receive IMRT than those managed by single-specialty groups without ownership (43% vs 30%, p<0.001), regardless of group size. Among patients with a very high risk (> 75%) of noncancer mortality within 10 yr of diagnosis, both IMRT use (42% vs 26%, p<0.001) and overall treatment (53% vs 44%, p<0.001) were more likely in groups with ownership than in those without, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists practicing in single-specialty groups with an ownership interest in radiation therapy are more likely to treat men with prostate cancer, including those with a high risk of noncancer mortality. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed treatment for prostate cancer among urologists with varying levels of financial incentives favoring intervention. Those with stronger incentives, as determined by ownership interest in a radiation facility, were more likely to treat prostate cancer, even when treatment was unlikely to provide a survival benefit to the patient.


Assuntos
Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Administração da Prática Médica/organização & administração , Neoplasias da Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Urologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Urologia/métodos , Urologia/organização & administração
18.
BMJ ; 359: j4351, 2017 Oct 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29046278

RESUMO

Objectives To examine temporal trends in sex and age specific incidence of self harm in children and adolescents, clinical management patterns, and risk of cause specific mortality following an index self harm episode at a young age.Design Population based cohort study.Setting UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink-electronic health records from 647 general practices, with practice level deprivation measured ecologically using the index of multiple deprivation. Patients from eligible English practices were linked to hospital episode statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality records.Participants For the descriptive analytical phases we examined data pertaining to 16 912 patients aged 10-19 who harmed themselves during 2001-14. For analysis of cause specific mortality following self harm, 8638 patients eligible for HES and ONS linkage were matched by age, sex, and general practice with up to 20 unaffected children and adolescents (n=170 274).Main outcome measures In the first phase, temporal trends in sex and age specific annual incidence were examined. In the second phase, clinical management was assessed according to the likelihood of referral to mental health services and psychotropic drug prescribing. In the third phase, relative risks of all cause mortality, unnatural death (including suicide and accidental death), and fatal acute alcohol or drug poisoning were estimated as hazard ratios derived from stratified Cox proportional hazards models for the self harm cohort versus the matched unaffected comparison cohort.Results The annual incidence of self harm was observed to increase in girls (37.4 per 10 000) compared with boys (12.3 per 10 000), and a sharp 68% increase occurred among girls aged 13-16, from 45.9 per 10 000 in 2011 to 77.0 per 10 000 in 2014. Referrals within 12 months of the index self harm episode were 23% less likely for young patients registered at the most socially deprived practices, even though incidences were considerably higher in these localities. Children and adolescents who harmed themselves were approximately nine times more likely to die unnaturally during follow-up, with especially noticeable increases in risks of suicide (deprivation adjusted hazard ratio 17.5, 95% confidence interval 7.6 to 40.5) and fatal acute alcohol or drug poisoning (34.3, 10.2 to 115.7).Conclusions Gaining a better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the recent apparent increase in the incidence of self harm among early-mid teenage girls, and coordinated initiatives to tackle health inequalities in the provision of services to distressed children and adolescents, represent urgent priorities for multiple public agencies.


Assuntos
Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Comportamento Autodestrutivo , Prevenção do Suicídio , Adolescente , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/diagnóstico , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/mortalidade , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/psicologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/terapia , Fatores Sexuais , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
19.
Popul Health Manag ; 20(5): 362-367, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28574810

RESUMO

A growing literature documents the substantial burden that a small proportion of high-cost, medically complex patients impose on health care systems. However, it is not clear whether high-cost patients remain costly over time. This study looks at the monthly distribution of billed charges for a cohort of high-cost, medically complex patients enrolled in an intensive care management program in a university health care system, and finds that the billing trajectory is heterogeneous and highly nonlinear, characterized by a substantial spike in billed charges prior to identification, followed by a considerable drop prior to enrollment and a sustained drop thereafter. The conclusion is that many high-cost patients experience costly events that resolve without intensive case management. These results also suggest that interventions should target only those high-cost patients with expected continued high cost and that pre-post study designs may overstate the impact of interventions for high-cost, medically complex patients.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , New Mexico
20.
J Card Fail ; 23(4): 280-285, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27940335

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has emerged as a patient-centered heart failure-specific health status measure. It currently lacks routine and widespread use in clinical practice and trials. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between KCCQ and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters and clinical outcomes, compared with the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a single-centered observational analysis of 432 patients who presented to the Heart Failure Department, completed the KCCQ, and underwent CPET. The 1-year clinical outcome assessed was a composite of mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and need for heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device. In the KCCQ, the physical limitation domain had a correlation with peak VO2 similar to NYHA (r = 0.48; P < .001; and r = -0.48; P < .001; respectively), and slightly better correlation with ventilatory threshold (r = 0.42; P < .001; and r = -0.40; P < .001; respectively). According to model validation, the KCCQ physical limitation domain and NYHA were similar predictors of peak VO2 (r2 = 0.229; and r2 = 0.227; respectively). KCCQ predicted the specified 1-year clinical outcome (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.82; P < .001) and provided incremental predictive ability when added to a model that included NYHA, with a net reclassification index of 76.1% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: KCCQ and NYHA provide similar assessment of functional capacity. KCCQ predicts 1-year clinical outcomes, providing incremental value over NYHA. These findings support its routine use in clinical care, as well as its potential to serve as a measure in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Tolerância ao Exercício , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Cardiomiopatias/complicações , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/psicologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Kansas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA