Prescribing trends of glaucoma drugs in six major cities of China from 2013 to 2017.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prescribing trends of glaucoma drugs in six major cities of China from 2013 to 2017. METHODS: A descriptive analysis using pharmacy prescription data was conducted. Outpatient prescription data was extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project. Prescribing patterns, trends of visits, and corresponding expenditures for glaucoma medications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 84297 ambulatory prescriptions were included in the current study. Visits by glaucoma patients increased from 13808 in 2013 to 20060 in 2017. Over the same period, the yearly expenditure for glaucoma drugs increased from 2.33 million to 3.95 million Chinese Yuan (CNY). Among all the six classes of glaucoma drugs (prostaglandin analogues, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α-receptor agonists, ß-receptor antagonists, cholinergic agonists and fixed combinations), ß-receptor antagonists were the most commonly prescribed in 2013, accounting for 34.3% of patients, but gradually decreased to 27.1% in 2017. Prostaglandin analogues became the most frequently prescribed drugs in 2017, accounting for 30.2% of the visits. Prostaglandin analogues are the most expensive and yielded a total expenditure of 2.34 million CNY in 2017, followed by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α-receptor agonists, ß-receptor antagonists, fixed combinations, and cholinergic agonists. Combination therapy became increasingly prescribed in 2017. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma prescribing practices exhibited substantial changes over the study period. The number of glaucoma prescriptions continuously increased from 2013 to 2017, leading to increased prescription costs. These findings implied a similar trend observed in previous studies, as well as recommendations in the appropriate guidelines.

Young Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and/or Disruptive Behavior Disorders Are More Frequently Prescribed Alpha Agonists Than Stimulants.

Objective: To examine medication prescribing patterns for preschool-aged children with diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or disruptive behavior disorder (DBD). Secondary objectives included determining if prescription patterns varied by gender, insurance type, or comorbid diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional chart review was completed for children ages 2-5 years who were treated at an academic medical center between 2013 and 2016 with a diagnosis of ADHD and/or DBD. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact and chi-square tests and Cochran-Armitage trend analysis. Results: Of the 966 children who met inclusion criteria, 343 (35.5%) were prescribed ADHD medications. For 2-, 3-, and 4-year olds, the most commonly prescribed medication was an alpha agonist (AA), while for 5-year olds, methylphenidate (MPH) was most commonly prescribed. With advancing age, an increasing number of children were prescribed a stimulant medication and a decreasing number of children were prescribed an AA (p < 0.001). Children were more often prescribed an MPH formulation (48.2%) compared with amphetamine-based stimulants (26.8%). Children without ASD were more likely to be prescribed a stimulant medication (72.1%) when compared with children with ASD (37.0%, p < 0.0001). Children with private insurance were more likely to be prescribed an extended-release stimulant medication when compared with Medicaid patients (34.3% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.004). Conclusion: Both stimulants and nonstimulants are being prescribed regularly in very young children, even before the age of four at an academic medical center. AAs were the most commonly prescribed medication for children 2, 3, and 4 years of age with diagnoses of ADHD, DBD, and ASD. Insurance type, comorbid diagnosis of ASD, and age of child were found to be significantly associated with prescribing a nonpreferred medication.

Fifteen Minute Test May Save 15% or More on Rosacea Treatment.

Rosacea is a common inflammatory skin condition that impacts a large portion of fair-skinned populations. The redness associated with rosacea can be a significant challenge. Brimonidine sulfate and oxymetazoline HCL were both recently approved by the FDA for the management of facial redness. These agents, however, are costly, and not all patients respond to the medication. Herein, we describe a clinical pearl that helps to optimize patient selection for the medications. This saves the patient and the health care system both time and money. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(5):692-693.

Role of Topical Oxymetazoline for Management of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea.

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize topical oxymetazoline's pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, cost, and place in therapy for persistent redness associated with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches of MEDLINE (1975 to September 2017), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1975 to September 2017), and Cochrane Database (publications through September 2017) using the terms rosacea, persistent redness, α -agonist, and oxymetazoline. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Results were limited to studies of human subjects, English-language publications, and topical use of oxymetazoline. Relevant materials from government sources, industry, and reviews were also included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data support the efficacy of oxymetazoline for persistent facial redness. Little study beyond clinical trials cited in the drug approval process has been conducted. Current data suggest that oxymetazoline is similar in safety and efficacy to brimonidine. Head-to-head comparisons of topical α-agonists for erythema caused by rosacea are needed. CONCLUSION: The topical α-agonist, oxymetazoline, is safe and effective for reducing persistent facial redness associated with erythematotelangiectatic subtype of rosacea. Health care practitioners selecting among treatments should consider not only the subtype of rosacea but also individual patient response, preference, and cost.

Tizanidina para o tratamento do espasmo muscular doloroso / Tizanidine for the treatment of painful muscle spasm

TECNOLOGIA: Tizanidina (Sirdalud®). INDICAÇÃO NA BULA: Espasmo muscular doloroso associado à distúrbios estáticos e funcionais da coluna (síndromes cervical e lombar) e após cirurgia, como por exemplo, de hérnia de disco intervertebral ou de osteoartrite do quadril. Também é indicado para a espasticidade decorrente de distúrbios neurológicos, tais como: esclerose múltipla, mielopatia crônica, doenças degenerativas da medula espinhal, acidentes cerebrovasculares e paralisia cerebral. PERGUNTA: Tizanidina é eficaz e segura para o tratamento do espasmo muscular doloroso? EVIDÊNCIAS: Foram incluídas duas revisões sistemáticas e um ensaio clínico randomizado. Uma revisão sistemática sugere que baclofeno e tizanidina têm eficácia semelhante em pacientes com espasticidade e que tizanidina está associada a maior frequencia de boca seca, enquanto baclofeno com maior fraqueza. Além disso, tizanidina foi eficaz em comparação com o placebo em pacientes com espasticidade (principalmente associada a esclerose múltipla, dor nas costas ou dor no pescoço). Outra revisão sistemática indicou que tizanidina não apresenta diferença na eficácia para baclofeno e diazepam. Em comparação com placebo, tizanidina reduziu o tônus muscular em até 34%. Os eventos adversos associados à tizanidina (que ocorreram em 60 a 88% dos pacientes) foram principalmente sonolência e boca seca, e com menor frequência, alteração nas enzimas hepáticas. O ensaio clínico randomizado demonstrou que tizanidina é eficaz contra placebo e possui eficácia comparável a tiocolchicósido no tratamento da dor lombar aguda associada a espasmos musculares. CONCLUSÕES: Com base em evidências derivadas de estudos de baixa qualidade, tizanidina demonstrou ser eficaz em comparação com o placebo e não apresenta diferença em termos de eficácia para outros comparadores ativos, como baclofeno e diazepam. O principal evento adverso associado ao medicamento foi boca seca. O medicamento não apresenta registro na EMA. Estudos mais robustos são necessários para confirmar a eficácia da tizanidina dentro da sua indicação clínica.(AU)

Noradrenaline is as Effective as Terlipressin in Hepatorenal Syndrome Type 1: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a functional renal failure occurring in end stage liver disease, which is associated with poor prognosis. Terlipressin has been shown to be effective in treatment of HRS. More recently, it was suggested that noradrenaline, an alpha-adrenergic drug may be also effective in HRS. We aimed to compare the efficacy of noradrenaline versus terlipressin in treatment of HRS type 1. METHODS: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis and HRS type 1 were enrolled and randomised into 2 groups- Group A received intravenous noradrenaline infusion (0.5-3 mg/h) and group B received intravenous terlipressin (0.5-2 mg/6h) for 2 weeks. Intravenous albumin (20 g/day) was given to both groups. RESULTS: Out of 55 cirrhotics screened, 41 were randomised into group A (n=21) or group B (n=20). Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. HRS reversal was seen in 47.6%(10/21) patients in group A, and 45% (9/20) patients in group B (p=1.00). In both groups, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine from baseline (group A- 3.1±1.4 mg/dl to 2.2±1.3 mg/dl, p=0.028; group B- 3.4±1.6 mg/dl to 2.3±1.3 mg/dl, p=0.035). Both the groups showed a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (group A- 77.3±8.6 mmHg to 103.4±8.3 mmHg, p=0.0001; group B- 76.8±11.6 mmHg to 100±9.4 mmHg, p=0.0001). Noradrenaline was associated with fewer adverse events and was significantly cheaper than terlipressin. Lower baseline MELD score was an independent predictor of response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Noradrenaline is as effective and safe as terlipressin in the treatment of HRS type 1.

Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Pharmacologic strategies for the mother and infant.

Opioid use in pregnancy has increased dramatically over the past decade. Since prenatal opioid use is associated with numerous obstetrical and neonatal complications, this now has become a major public health problem. In particular, in utero opioid exposure can result in neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) which is a serious condition characterized by central nervous system hyperirritability and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. The present review seeks to define current practices regarding the approach to the pregnant mother and neonate with prenatal opiate exposure. Although the cornerstone of prenatal management of opioid dependence is opioid maintenance therapy, the ideal agent has yet to be definitively established. Pharmacologic management of NAS is also highly variable and may include an opioid, barbiturate, and/or α-agonist. Genetic factors appear to be associated with the incidence and severity of NAS. Establishing pharmacogenetic risk factors for the development of NAS has the potential for creating opportunities for "personalized genomic medicine" and novel, individualized therapeutic interventions.

Safety, Feasibility, and Hemodynamic Effects of Mild Hypothermia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The TAVR-CHILL Trial.

The safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic effects of mild hypothermia (MH) induced by transnasal cooling were studied in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MH is a common therapy following cardiac arrest and seems to have favorable effects in myocardial infarction and on hemodynamic stability. In TAVR, hemodynamic instability is common during rapid pacing. Twenty subjects undergoing TAVR were randomized 1:1 to hypothermia or normothermia. Hemodynamic endpoints were mean arterial blood pressure and required dosage of vasoactive and inotropic drugs. Patients were followed up at 6 months. All patients in the MH group (n=10) reached the target temperature of 34°C before first rapid pacing. Tympanic and urinary bladder temperature remained significantly lower in the MH group during the procedure. No adverse effects of cooling were observed. Mean arterial pressure was higher in the MH group (90±20 mm Hg) than in the control group (71±13 mm Hg) at the start of the procedure, at first rapid pacing (94±19 vs. 80±16 mm Hg), and at balloon aortic valvuloplasty (90±17 vs. 73±14 mm Hg). Less norepinephrine was administered to the hypothermia group. Transnasal cooling during TAVR was safe and well tolerated. We observed a more stable hemodynamic profile in the MH group, indicated by higher blood pressure and lower levels of vasoactive drugs required. A larger study of patients with severe ventricular dysfunction is required to more comprehensively investigate the hemodynamic effects of transnasal cooling in TAVR.

Assessment and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: part 2.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral disorder of childhood. In part 1 of this article, information regarding primary care assessment of ADHD was presented. Part 2 focuses on best practice guidelines for treatment once the diagnosis has been established. For most children, successful treatment of ADHD requires a multicomponent approach comprised of patient and family psychoeducation, use of medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (eg, stimulants) and/or behavioral interventions, and management of any psychiatric comorbid conditions. Furthermore, as ADHD is a chronic illness, primary care physicians will need to frequently reassess their patients and make treatment adjustments as needed.

[Dexmedetomidine]. / Dexmedetomidin.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-receptor agonist with sedative, analgetic and anxiolytic effects. It is chemically related to clonidine and has been an authorized drug in Europe since September 2011. Dexmedetomidine enables a level of sedation in which mechanically ventilated patients may be woken by verbal stimulation (Richmond agitation sedation scale RASS 0--3). In this respect dexmedetomidine achieves the same desired effect as propofol and midazolam; however, in direct comparison to a sedation regime with benzodiazepines, dexmedetomidine reduces the prevalence, duration and severity of delirium in intensive care. Patients sedated by dexmedetomidine can statistically be extubated earlier and an influence on duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been shown. Daily therapy costs are approximately 5 times higher than those of propofol but an objective standpoint in relation to clinical cost efficiency is unattainable.

Estudo sobre os fatores relacionados a interrupção do tratamento do glaucoma / Study of the factors related to stop the treatment of glaucoma

OBJETIVO: Identificar causas relacionadas com a não aderência ao tratamento do glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto e sugerir meios para posteriormente minimizá-las. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado um questionário a pacientes portadores de glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto no Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle, escolhidos aleatoriamente, para avaliação dos fatores relacionados com a interrupção do tratamento. Para isso, utilizou-se uma análise univariada, pelo teste exato de Fisher, e considerou estatisticamente significativo p<0,05. RESULTADOS: A partir do questionário, identificou-se dois subgrupos, um que já havia interrompido o tratamento e outro que nunca o havia interrompido, compostos por 25 e 11 pacientes respectivamente. Estes grupos foram comparados entre si e todos os parâmetros analisados. O custo dos medicamentos (p=0,001) e o fator esquecimento (p=0,007) foram estatisticamente relevantes para a interrupção do tratamento da doença. As demais variáveis testadas não obtiveram significância estatística. CONCLUSÃO: O custo dos medicamentos e o fator esquecimento foram os fatores mais importantes para interrupção do tratamento.

The objective was to identify causes related to noncompliance of primary open-angle glaucoma and suggest ways to minimize them later. A questionnaire was given to patients with primary open angle glaucoma in Hospital Gaffrée Guinle, chosen randomly, to assess factors related to discontinuation of treatment. For this we used a univariate analysis by Fisher's exact test and considered statistically significant p <0.05. From the questionnaire, we identified two sub-groups, who had stopped treatment and another who had never stopped for 25 compounds and 11 patients respectively. These groups were compared, and all parameters examined. The cost of drugs (p = 0.001) and forgetting factor (p = 0.007) were statistically significant for discontinuation of treatment of disease. The other variables tested did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The cost of drugs and forgetting to take medication were the factors most important to withholding treatment.

Update on the role of alpha-agonists in glaucoma management.

Glaucoma is the second most common cause of world blindness (following cataract) with estimated cases reaching 79.6 million by 2020. Although the etiology of glaucoma is multi-factorial, intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable factor in glaucoma management proven to alter the natural course of the disease. Among various classes of IOP-lowering medications currently available, alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists are used either as monotherapy, as second-line therapy, or in fixed combination with beta-blockers. Non-selective adrenergic agonists such as epinephrine and dipivefrin are infrequently used today for the treatment of glaucoma or ocular hypertension, and have been replaced by the alpha-2-selective agonists. The use of apraclonidine for IOP reduction in glaucoma or OHT is limited due to a high rate of follicular conjunctivitis. The alpha-2-selective agonist in use today is brimonidine. The brimonidine-purite formulations are preferred to brimonidine-benzalkonium chloride (BAC) formulations due better tolerability while maintaining similar efficacy. Brimonidine is also effective when used in combination with a beta-blocker. Using brimonidine-timolol fixed combination (BTFC) as first-line therapy has an added potential for neuroprotection. This would be a valuable strategy for glaucoma treatment, for patients who are intolerant of prostaglandin analogs, or for patients where prostaglandin analogues are contraindicated as first-line therapy, such as in patients with inflammatory glaucoma.

Assessment of clonidine effect as premedicative drug on kidney function.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of oral clonidine as a premedicative drug on 24-hour urine output, urine specific gravity, plasma renin activity as well as serum and urine electrolytes levels. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out on 60 women aged 20-40 years old undergoing repair of cystocoele-rectocoele perineorraphy under general anaesthesia in Asali Hospital in 2004 in Khorramabad, Iran. Subjects were randomly divided into two equal groups of 30 each. Group I and group II received clonidine tablet at the dose of 5 microg/kg and placebo tablet, respectively, 90 minutes before induction of general anesthesia. In this study, blood and urine samples were taken for laboratory measurements prior as well as 6 hours after taking the tablets. Differences between the two groups were compared through Mann-Whitney u-test, chi2 test and t-student test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no significant changes before and after receiving tablets in urine and blood Na and K as well as urine specific gravity in group II (P > 0.05). Group I had higher urine Na and K level (P = 0.001), however, no differences had been shown in blood Na and K level (P > 0.05). Urine specific gravity was lower in group I after receiving tablet (P < 0.009). A significant increase in 24-hour urine output (P = 0.001) and a marked decrease in plasma renin activity was seen in group I (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that clonidine is a safe premedicative drug in anaesthesia and does not change the serum electrolytes levels.

Pediatric safety of tizanidine: clinical adverse event database and retrospective chart assessment.

BACKGROUND: Tizanidine is an imidazoline with central alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist activity at both spinal and supraspinal levels, which is indicated as a short-acting drug for the management of spasticity. Despite being used in pediatric populations, there is no adequate information or well controlled studies to document the safety and efficacy of tizanidine in this group. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of tizanidine in the pediatric population. We compared spontaneous adverse event reports in the Acorda Therapeutics worldwide clinical adverse event database for children (< or = 16 years; n = 99) and adults (>16 years; n = 1153) who had received tizanidine and for whom at least one adverse event was reported, and performed a retrospective chart review of the safety of tizanidine in children (< or = 16 years; n = 76) at a large US pediatric neurology practice. Causality of adverse events in our worldwide clinical adverse event database were neither assessed nor assigned by the company. RESULTS: When adverse events from the clinical adverse event database were collapsed into the 25 Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; version 9.0) organ system classes, five classes were more frequent in adults (general disorders and administration site conditions [p = 0.0006], hepatobiliary disorders [p = 0.0031], nervous system disorders [p = 0.0108], skin and subcutaneous disorders [p = 0.0063], and vascular disorders [p = 0.0029]), while one class was more frequent in children (psychiatric disorders [p < 0.0001]). The most common adverse event classes in children were psychiatric disorders (52.5%) followed by nervous system disorders (29.3%), and gastrointestinal disorders (16.2%), whereas the most common adverse event classes in adults were nervous system disorders (42.4%), general disorders and administration site conditions (28.6%), and gastrointestinal disorders (21.3%). Serious adverse events were substantially less frequent in children than adults (19.2% vs 45.9%) in the clinical adverse event database. In the pediatric practice chart review, the incidence of adverse events in the MedDRA psychiatric disorders class was very similar (52.6%) to that for children in the clinical adverse event database, while the next most common classes were gastrointestinal disorders (14.5%), and nervous system disorders (13.2%). There were three deaths in children across the databases, including one from accidental exposure and two from cardiac events; the relationship of cardiac events in relation to tizanidine or other causes was difficult to assess with the limited available information.The major causes of death in adults were related to suicide or overdose. Minor, transient liver transaminase increases were occasionally reported; the effect of tizanidine could not be ruled out. CONCLUSION: The overall safety of tizanidine in the pediatric group appeared good; however, the adverse event profile differed from that in adults. This difference most likely reflects the off-label use of tizanidine as adjunctive treatment for attention disorders and autism. The frequency and nature of adverse events in adults were consistent with the tizanidine prescribing information as reported for its approved indication, i.e. management of spasticity.

An updated focused review of dexmedetomidine in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recent comparative studies regarding the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in adults. DATA SOURCES: Articles evaluating safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine were identified from an English-language MEDLINE search (1996-July 2009), with a focus on data published since our previous review in 2007 to the present. MeSH terms included dexmedetomidine, medetomidine, alpha2-agonist, and sedation. References from selected articles were also reviewed for additional material. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Experimental and observational English-language studies that focused on the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of dexmedetomidine in humans were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS: Dexmedetomidine is an 2-agonist used for sedation during procedures and in critical illness. Compared with placebo, use of dexmedetomidine during procedures was associated with decreased use of rescue midazolam and a similar degree of sedation compared with various agents used during surgery or for procedures. Use of long-term (>24 h) dexmedetomidine sedation is comparable to sedation with benzodiazepines in critically ill patients. In a Phase 4 study, dexmedetomidine was safe in dosages up to 1.4 microg/kg/hour for greater than 24 hours and did not produce rebound tachycardia or hypertension when abruptly discontinued. One small randomized controlled trial demonstrated decreased incidence of delirium, the primary endpoint, with dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam or propofol for sedation after cardiac valve surgery. Many, but not all, studies suggest that dexmedetomidine has a promising role in prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill patients when delirium was studied as a secondary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine is an alternative for procedural sedation and can be used long-term (>24 h) in critically ill patients, in dosages up to 1.5 microg/kg/hour. More studies are needed to better define the role of dexmedetomidine in preventing and treating delirium.

Attenuation of hemodynamic responses following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation -- comparative assessment of clonidine and gabapentin premedication.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to compare the effect of clonidine and gabapentin premedication in modifying the hyperdynamic response following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-five ASA I-II patients of both sexes (37 males (49.3%), 38 females (50.7%)) 18 to 45 years (mean 32.8 +/- 8.65 yr.) were randomly allocated into three equal groups (25 each). Group-1 received 0.2 mg clonidine, Group-2 received placebo and Group-3 received 900 mg gabapentin, 120 minute before operation. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were measured before induction of anesthesia, before laryngoscopy, and 1, 3, 5, 10 min after intubation. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that the heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure significantly differed between groups (p<0.001, p = 0.003, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). The highest rates of heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were in the placebo group and in one minute after laryngoscopy, and the lowest rate were in the gabapentin group at the time of 1, 3, 5 and 10 after laryngoscopy, except that the lowest rate of heart rate in 10 min after laryngoscopy was in clonidine group. CONCLUSION: The data propose that both clonidine and gabapentin have effective role in blunting hyperdynamic responses after laryngoscopy, more so with gabapentin.