Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmaceut Med ; 37(1): 37-52, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36611111

RESUMO

Problematic gambling has been suggested to be a possible consequence of dopaminergic medications used mainly in neurological conditions, i.e. pramipexole and ropinirole, and possibly by one antipsychotic compound, aripiprazole. Patients with Parkinson's disease, restless legs syndrome and other conditions potentially treated with dopamine agonists, as well as patients treated for psychotic disorders, are vulnerable patient groups with theoretically increased risk of developing gambling disorder (GD), for example due to higher rates of mental ill-health in these groups. The aim of the present paper is to review the epidemiological, clinical, and neurobiological evidence of the association between dopaminergic medications and GD, and to describe risk groups and treatment options. The neurobiology of GD involves the reward and reinforcement system, based mainly on mesocorticolimbic dopamine projections, with the nucleus accumbens being a crucial area for developing addictions to substances and behaviors. The addictive properties of gambling can perhaps be explained by the reward uncertainty that activates dopamine signaling in a pathological manner. Since reward-related learning is mediated by dopamine, it can be altered by dopaminergic medications, possibly leading to increased gambling behavior and a decreased impulse control. A causal relationship between the medications and GD seems likely, but the molecular mechanisms behind this association have not been fully described yet. More research is needed in order to fully outline the clinical picture of GD developing in patient groups with dopaminergic medications, and data are needed on the differentiation of risk in different compounds. In addition, very few interventional studies are available on the management of GD induced by dopaminergic medications. While GD overall can be treated, there is need for treatment studies testing the effectiveness of tapering of the medication or other gambling-specific treatment modalities in these patient groups.


Assuntos
Jogo de Azar , Doença de Parkinson , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas , Humanos , Jogo de Azar/induzido quimicamente , Jogo de Azar/epidemiologia , Jogo de Azar/terapia , Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 108(6): e275-e282, 2023 05 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36494095

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Dopamine agonist (DA)-induced impulse control disorder (ICD) represents a group of behavioral disorders that are increasingly recognized in patients with prolactinoma. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the genetic component of the underlying mechanism of DA-induced ICD. METHODS: Patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist (cabergoline) treatment were included in the study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who developed ICD due to DA and patients who did not. Patients were evaluated for polymorphisms of the DRD1, DRD3, COMT, DDC, GRIN2B, TPH2, OPRK1, OPRM1, SLC6A4, SLC6A3, HTR2A genes. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients with prolactinoma using cabergoline, 20 were diagnosed with ICD. When patients with and without ICD were compared according to genotype frequencies, OPRK1/rs702764, DRD3/rs6280, HTR2A/rs6313, SLC6A4/rs7224199, GRIN2B/rs7301328, TPH2/rs7305115, COMT/rs4680, DRD1/rs4532 polymorphisms significantly increased in patients with DA-induced ICD. CONCLUSION: Our results show that multiple neurotransmission systems affect DA-induced ICD in patients with prolactinoma.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Prolactinoma , Humanos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Prolactinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Prolactinoma/genética , Cabergolina , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/genética , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/genética , Proteínas da Membrana Plasmática de Transporte de Serotonina
3.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 25(9): 727-736, 2022 09 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35639870

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The dopaminergic partial agonism of the so-called third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine) is hypothesized to cause impulse control disorders (ICDs). Relevant warnings by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were posted on aripiprazole (2016) and brexpiprazole (2018). Our study investigated the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and the pharmacodynamic CHEMBL database to further characterize TGA-induced ICDs. METHODS: We downloaded and pre-processed the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System up to December 2020. We adapted Bradford Hill criteria to assess each TGA's -and secondarily other antipsychotics'-causal role in inducing ICDs (pathological gambling, compulsive shopping, hyperphagia, hypersexuality), accounting for literature and disproportionality. ICD clinical features were analyzed, and their pathogenesis was investigated using receptor affinities. RESULTS: A total of 2708 reports of TGA-related ICDs were found, primarily recording aripiprazole (2545 reports, 94%) among the drugs, and gambling (2018 reports, 75%) among the events. Bradford-Hill criteria displayed evidence for a causal role of each TGA consistent across subpopulations and when correcting for biases. Significant disproportionalities also emerged for lurasidone with compulsive shopping, hyperphagia, and hypersexuality, and olanzapine and ziprasidone with hyperphagia. Time to onset varied between days and years, and positive dechallenge was observed in 20% of cases. Frequently, co-reported events were economic (50%), obsessive-compulsive (44%), and emotional conditions (34%). 5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor type 1a agonism emerged as an additional plausible pathogenetic mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: We detected an association between TGAs and ICDs and identified a new signal for lurasidone. ICD characteristics are behavior specific and may heavily impact on life. The role of 5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor type 1a agonism should be further explored.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Dopamina , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hiperfagia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperfagia/tratamento farmacológico , Cloridrato de Lurasidona , Olanzapina , Farmacovigilância , Quinolonas , Receptores de Serotonina , Tiofenos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 11: 579606, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193096

RESUMO

Background: Dopamine agonists (DA) are the first line therapy for prolactinoma and symptomatic hyperprolactinemia; use as an adjuvant treatment for acromegaly and Cushing's disease is rare. Some patients develop de novo psychiatric symptoms or have exacerbation of pre-existing conditions during DA therapy. A practical, clinically sensitive depression and impulse control disorders (ICD; particularly hypersexuality and gambling disorders) detection tool is important for identifying at risk patients. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) are sensitive in identifying impulsivity and depression. Objective: Detail use of the BIS-11 and PHQ-9 as screening tools for depression and ICD in patients with pituitary disease at a high-volume academic pituitary center. Methods: DA-treated and naïve patients with pituitary disease were included. Patients with a known history of depression or psychiatric disorder were excluded. PHQ-9 standardized interpretation criteria were utilized to classify depression severity. For BIS-11, threshold was established based on previous studies. Statistical analysis was with SPSS version 25. Results: Seventy-six DA-treated and 27 naïve patients were included. Moderate and moderately severe depression were more prevalent in DA-treated patients; severe depression only found in DA-treated patients. A normal BIS-11 score was noted in 76.69%; higher scores (not significant) were noted in DA-treated patients. There was a positive correlation between higher BIS-11 and PHQ-9 scores; higher in DA-treated patients (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) than DA-naïve patients. Patients with BIS-11 scores ≥60 were younger and received lower cumulative DA doses compared to patients with BIS scores <60. There was no association between male sex and BIS-11 ≥60 and male sex did not increase the odds of increased scores (OR = 0.66, CI95% 0.25-1.76, p = 0.41). No significant difference was found for macroadenoma, prolactin levels, testosterone levels, hypogonadism, testosterone replacement in men, and increased impulsivity or depression scores. Conclusion: Use of PHQ-9 and BIS-11 is practical for routine screening of depression and ICD during outpatient pituitary clinic visits for patients with pituitary disease both naïve to treatment and during DA therapy. We recommend close follow-up after initiation of DA therapy for younger patients, regardless of dose.


Assuntos
Adenoma/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo/patologia , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/patologia , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/tratamento farmacológico , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Adenoma/patologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Transtorno Depressivo/induzido quimicamente , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 15(9): 1225-1232, 2019 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538593

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Published literature documents increased risk for psychiatric adverse events (P-AEs) following dopamine agonist (DA) initiation for treatment of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). We examined the association between DA initiation and subsequent new-onset P-AEs among patients with a new diagnosis of RLS who had no history of psychiatric disorder or DA use. METHODS: Selected were adults (age 18 years or older) enrolled through United States employer-sponsored plans and Medicare Advantage from 7/1/2008-12/31/2014, with ≥ 2 years of claims data preceding their first RLS diagnosis ("preindex period"). Excluded were those with psychiatric diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] 290-319) or DA use during the preindex period, and those with possible secondary RLS. Patients who initiated (DA+) versus did not initiate (DA-) DAs were matched 1:1 on age at index RLS diagnosis, sex, geographic region, and employment status, and preindex period comorbid illness burden and number of non-DA drug fills. Using a validated ICD-9-based severity-of-illness psychiatric disorder classification system, we compared likelihoods of new-onset P-AEs between matched pairs during parallel follow-up periods. RESULTS: Identified were 889 matched pairs. Compared with their DA- counterparts, DA+ patients were nearly two times more likely to experience development of any P-AE (odds ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.24, P < .0001); and similarly more likely to experience the development of a severe (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.86, P = .04), moderately severe (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.29, P = .004), or mild (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12-2.65, P = .01) P-AE. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to DA- matched control patients, patients in whom RLS was newly diagnosed and who initiated de novo DAs demonstrated significantly increased risk for subsequent development of P-AEs of any severity. CITATION: Hankin C, Lee D, Garcia-Borreguero D, Wang Z. Increased risk for new-onset psychiatric adverse events in patients with newly diagnosed primary restless legs syndrome who initiate treatment with dopamine agonists: a large-scale retrospective claims matched-cohort analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(9): 1225-1232.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Mentais/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Medicare , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos
6.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 234(22): 3279-3297, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28889207

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Hyperprolactinemia is a highly prevalent adverse effect of many antipsychotic agents, with potentially serious health consequences. Several guidelines have been developed for the management of this condition; yet, their concordance has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this paper were (1) to review current clinical guidelines; (2) to review key systematic evidence for management; and (3) based on our findings, to develop an integrated management recommendation specific to male and female patients who are otherwise clinically stabilised on antipsychotics. METHODS: We performed searches of Medline and EMBASE, supplemented with guideline-specific database and general web searches, to identify clinical guidelines containing specific recommendations for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia, produced/updated 01/01/2010-15/09/2016. A separate systematic search was performed to identify emerging management approaches described in reviews and meta-analyses published ≥ 2010. RESULTS: There is some consensus among guidelines relating to baseline PRL screening (8/12 guidelines), screening for differential diagnosis (7/12) and discontinuing/switching PRL-raising agent (7/12). Guidelines otherwise diverge substantially regarding most aspects of screening, monitoring and management (e.g. treatment with dopamine agonists). There is an omission of clear sex-specific recommendations. Systematic literature on management approaches is promising; more research is needed. An integrated management recommendation is presented to guide sex-specific clinical response to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Key aspects include asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia monitoring and fertility considerations with PRL normalisation. CONCLUSION: Further empirical work is key to shaping robust guidelines for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. The integrated management recommendation can assist clinician and patient decision-making, with the goal of balancing effective psychiatric treatment while minimising PRL-related adverse health effects in male and female patients.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Hiperprolactinemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperprolactinemia/diagnóstico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperprolactinemia/terapia , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prolactina/sangue , Fatores Sexuais
7.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 28(10): 1597-614, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27373317

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) have become a widely recognized non-motor complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) in patients taking dopamine replacement therapy (DRT). There are no current evidence-based recommendations for their treatment, other than reducing their dopaminergic medication. METHODS: This study reviews the current literature of the treatment of ICDs including pharmacological treatments, deep brain stimulation, and psychotherapeutic interventions. RESULTS: Dopamine agonist withdrawal is the most common and effective treatment, but may lead to an aversive withdrawal syndrome or motor symptom degeneration in some individuals. There is insufficient evidence for all other pharmacological treatments in treating ICDs in PD, including amantadine, serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and opioid antagonists (e.g. naltrexone). Large randomized control trials need to be performed before these drugs can be routinely used for the treatment of ICDs in PD. Deep brain stimulation remains equivocal because ICD symptoms resolve in some patients after surgery but may appear de novo in others. Cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to improve ICD symptoms in the only published study, although further research is urgently needed. CONCLUSIONS: Further research will allow for the development of evidence-based guidelines for the management of ICDs in PD.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/etiologia , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/terapia , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia
8.
Drug Saf ; 34(4): 329-38, 2011 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21417505

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of the ergot-derived dopamine receptor agonists (cabergoline and pergolide) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac valvulopathy. Pergolide was withdrawn from the US market in 2007 because of the risk of valvular heart disease, while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) required a reduction in the maximum daily dosage of cabergoline and pergolide from 6 mg/day to 3 mg/day in 2008. In Japan, the package inserts of both drugs were revised in April 2007 to request that physicians conduct periodic ultrasonic cardiography (UCG) examinations for patients taking cabergoline or pergolide. Also, through face-to-face communication with medical representatives of drug companies, physicians were informed that use of cabergoline and pergolide has increased the risk of valvulopathy. However, cabergoline and pergolide have remained in wide use, even following the regulatory actions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of actions, including the package insert revision in April 2007, to encourage periodic UCG. METHODS: Data on monthly claims (January 2005-October 2008) covering 330 000 patients were obtained from a Japanese database vendor. We selected patients ≥40 years of age with Parkinson's disease. The impact of the regulatory action on the proportion of patients with Parkinson's disease prescribed cabergoline or pergolide was assessed by segmented regression analysis and by a statistical model of the rates of UCG examination in patients taking/not taking cabergoline or pergolide before and after the action. We also compared the use of cabergoline and pergolide before and after the action with that of other antiparkinson drugs. RESULTS: Of 574 patients with Parkinson's disease, the proportion of patients prescribed cabergoline or pergolide did not decrease but rather tended to increase after the action when analysed by segmented regression analysis (p = 0.13). Similarly, the proportion of the prevalent and incident users of cabergoline or pergolide did not change between two 19-month periods before and after the action. The adjusted rates of UCG examination per person-year before and after the action were both 0.02 in those not prescribed cabergoline or pergolide, but 0.02 before the action and 0.09 after the action in those taking either drug. The excess UCG examination rate of cabergoline or pergolide attributable to the action was 0.08 per person-year (95% CI 0.03, 0.11). While 1 of 49 (2%) patients taking cabergoline or pergolide had a UCG up to 19 months before the action, 9 of 36 (25%) patients taking cabergoline or pergolide had a UCG up to 19 months after the action. Annual sales from 2004 to 2008 were 195, 195, 170, 110 and 75 billion yen, respectively, and the number of valvulopathy events, including incompetence of aortic/mitral/tricuspid valves and cardiac valve disease, per annual sales from 2004 to 2008 were estimated at 0.23, 0.03, 0.08, 0.25 and 0.19 per billion yen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following the actions in April 2007, no decrease in the use of cabergoline or pergolide occurred, although more patients administered the drug underwent a UCG. However, those undergoing a UCG represented one-quarter of the total number prescribed cabergoline or pergolide. To mitigate the risk, additional risk management tools such as patient registration may be needed to secure careful clinical examination (including UCG examination, if necessary) for cardiac function.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Regulamentação Governamental , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Legislação de Medicamentos , Cabergolina , Bases de Dados Factuais , Agonistas de Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Ergolinas/administração & dosagem , Ergolinas/efeitos adversos , Ergolinas/uso terapêutico , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Japão , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Pergolida/administração & dosagem , Pergolida/efeitos adversos , Pergolida/uso terapêutico , Análise de Regressão , Ultrassonografia
9.
Sleep Med ; 12(5): 440-4, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21239226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic disease, which is managed with palliative medications that are likely to be required for a patient's lifetime. It is, therefore, important to know the long-term consequences of these treatments. Currently, the most commonly prescribed treatment for RLS is one of the dopamine (DA) agonists. Most of what we understand about efficacy and side effects of the DA agonists are, however, derived from relatively short-term studies. This is particularly a problem since these medications produce in some patients a significant increase or augmentation of RLS symptoms known to occur during the first 2 years of treatment and perhaps even later in treatment. The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy (10-year) for commonly used RLS medication types: dopaminergic agonists and opioids. METHODS: Records of all RLS patients treated in one tertiary care center with pramipexole, pergolide or methadone during the years 1997-2007 were reviewed. The duration and reason for any discontinuation of treatment and medication doses were recorded. RESULTS: Annual rates for discontinuing treatment persisted for up to 10 years of treatment and were fairly constant after the first year at 9% for pramipexole, 8% for pergolide, and 0% for methadone. Similarly, annual augmentation rates were fairly constant after the first year and persisted for up to 10 years at 7% for pramipexole, 5% for pergolide, and 0% for methadone. The percentage continuing on the treatment medication for over 5 years was 58% for pramipexole and 35% for pergolide. CONCLUSIONS: The DA agonists appear to have a limited period of clinical utility for many patients. Severe augmentation, while not common in any 1 year, can develop even after years on the medication. Methadone, in contrast, shows neither augmentation nor major problems with continued efficacy after the first year of treatment.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Benzotiazóis/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Metadona/administração & dosagem , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Benzotiazóis/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estudos Longitudinais , Metadona/efeitos adversos , Pergolida/administração & dosagem , Pergolida/efeitos adversos , Pramipexol , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Clin Ther ; 32(2): 221-37, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20206780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of dopamine agonists (DAs) for the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) has been assessed in numerous randomized clinical trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the reporting quality of published RCTs according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and to synthesize the study results in terms of efficacy and tolerability to inform the clinical management of RLS. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched for English-language RCTs that assessed the effects of DAs in RLS. Quality of reporting was measured using the proportion of 17 CONSORT checklist items included in each study. The 2 primary outcomes were pooled mean change from baseline in International RLS (IRLS) Study Group rating scale score (Deltamu) (95% CI) and relative risk (RR) (95% CI) of response based on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale score. The pooled proportions of adverse events (PAEs) (95% CI) were also estimated. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs (N = 2848 patients) were included. Two of the 17 CONSORT checklist items were reported in 7 studies (39%) and 9 of the 17 items were reported in all 18 studies (100%). The differences in the IRLS scores and RR for CGI-I were significantly greater with pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine, and cabergoline compared with placebo. Results for heterogeneity were nonsignificant. The difference in Deltamu (95% CI) was significant with pramipexole (-6.63 [-9.15 to -4.10]) versus ropinirole (-3.64 [-4.76 to 2.51]) (P = 0.04). The difference between pramipexole and rotigotine was nonsignificant. The pooled PAEs (95% CI) for pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine were 4.8% (2.0% to 8.7%), 10.2% (2.6% to 22.1%), and 7.6% (1.3% to 18.5%), respectively. In the trial of sumanirole, the PAE value was 2% (0% to 5.4%). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings from the meta-analysis, DAs were significantly more efficacious in the treatment of RLS compared with placebo.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Agonistas de Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Efeito Placebo , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
CNS Drugs ; 23(2): 157-70, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19173374

RESUMO

Dopamine dysregulation syndrome (DDS) is a relatively recently described iatrogenic disturbance that may complicate long-term symptomatic therapy of Parkinson's disease. Patients with DDS develop an addictive pattern of dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) use, administering doses in excess of those required to control their motor symptoms. The prevalence of DDS in patients attending specialist Parkinson's disease centres is 3-4%. Amongst the behavioural disturbances associated with DDS are punding, which is a complex stereotyped behaviour, and impulse control disorders (ICDs), such as pathological gambling, hypersexuality, compulsive shopping and compulsive eating. We review the risk factors and potential mechanisms for the development of DDS, including personality traits, potential genetic influences and Parkinson's disease-related cognitive deficits. Impulsive personality traits are prominent in patients developing DDS, and have been previously associated with the development of substance dependence. Candidate genes affecting the dopamine 'D(2)-like' receptor family have been associated with impulsive personality traits in addition to drug and nondrug addictions. Impaired decision making is implicated in addictive behaviours, and decision-making abilities can be influenced by dopaminergic medications. In Parkinson's disease, disruption of the reciprocal loops between the striatum and structures in the prefrontal cortex following dopamine depletion may predispose to DDS. The role of DRT in DDS is discussed, with particular reference to models of addiction, suggesting that compulsive drug use is due to progressive neuroadaptations in dopamine projections to the accumbens-related circuitry. Evidence for neuroadaptations and sensitization occurring in DDS include enhanced levodopa-induced ventral striatal dopamine release. Levodopa is still considered the most potent trigger for DDS in Parkinson's disease, but subcutaneous apomorphine and oral dopamine agonists may also be responsible. In the management of DDS, further research is needed to identify at-risk groups, thereby facilitating more effective early intervention. Therefore, an increased awareness of the syndrome amongst treating physicians is vital. Medication reduction strategies are employed, particularly with regard to avoiding rapidly acting 'booster' DRT formulations. Psychosocial treatments, including cognitive-behavioural therapy, have been beneficial in treating substance use disorders and ICDs in non-Parkinson's disease patients, but there are currently no published trials of psychological interventions in DDS. Further studies are also required to identify factors that can predict those patients with DDS or ICDs who will derive benefit from surgical interventions such as deep brain stimulation.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Dopamina/metabolismo , Doença Iatrogênica , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Cognição , Humanos , Recompensa , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Síndrome
12.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 35(2): 173-8, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18574930

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pergolide is an ergot derived dopamine agonist that is widely used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Studies have found an association between pergolide and valvular heart abnormalities although there is still much to be learned about the clinical significance of the valvular changes, who is at risk, and whether there is duration of exposure effect. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long term risk of hospital admissions for valvular heart disease (VHD) or congestive heart failure (CHF, a clinically overt outcome of VHD) in new users of pergolide compared to new users of levodopa. The secondary objective was to assess whether there are any characteristics that can predict who is at higher risk of developing this outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. SUBJECTS: Ontario residents aged 66 and older, newly started on treatment with either pergolide or levodopa. OUTCOMES: Admission to hospital with the most responsible diagnosis of congestive heart failure or valvular heart disease. RESULTS: The risk for admission for valvular heart disease or congestive heart failure were higher in those with 1-4 years exposure to pergolide compared with no exposure to pergolide (VHD: hazard ratio 2.4, p = 0.04; CHF: hazard ratio 1.6, p = 0.02). No such pattern was found with exposure to levodopa. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that treatment with pergolide is associated with a higher risk of hospital admission for valvular heart disease or congestive heart failure and that this risk is greater in those with 1-4 years exposure than in those with less exposure. We did not find an increased risk beyond four years.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Pergolida/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Administração de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Ontário , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico
14.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 109(4): 350-3, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17307289

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ergot derivatives on cardiac valves in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Echocardiography was performed on 46 PD patients who used either pergolide or cabergoline (MonoPD) or both (MixPD) for a minimum of 1 year and 49 age-matched healthy controls. Valvular regurgitation was graded as mild, moderate and severe. MonoPD and MixPD groups were compared with regard to demographic features, drug profile and valvulopathy. RESULTS: The PD group had a mean age of 63 years, agonist duration of 3.8 years and agonist equivalent dose of 3.5mg/day. Moderate regurgitation in all three valves was significantly more common in the PD group than the controls. Severe valvular regurgitation was not observed in either group, with the exception of one PD patient. The frequency of valvulopathy and doses of agonists did not differ between MixPD and MonoPD groups. CONCLUSION: PD patients on dopamine ergot agonists are prone to moderate valvular regurgitation more than age-matched controls. However, the frequency of valvulopathy was similar in patients who used either one or more agonists.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Ergolinas/efeitos adversos , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Pergolida/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Cabergolina , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ecocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Ergolinas/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pergolida/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/diagnóstico
15.
Prescrire Int ; 15(85): 173-6, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17128523

RESUMO

(1) The restless legs syndrome consists of unpleasant sensory and motor symptoms of varying intensity in the lower limbs. Symptoms occur at rest, seated or lying down, are more intense in the evening and at night, and are relieved by moving the limb. This syndrome does not cause serious physical complications. When sleep disturbances occur, non drug methods should be tried first. (2) Ropinirole is a dopaminergic agonist initially marketed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. It is the first drug to be approved for restless legs syndrome in France. (3) Three double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trials with similar designs showed minimal differences on a composite rating scale. After 12 weeks of treatment, ropinirole led to an improvement of about 3 points on a 40-point scale compared with placebo. (4) A 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trial and including patients who had "responded" to ropinirole showed a lower relapse rate in the group that continued to use ropinirole (32.6%) instead of switching to placebo (57.8%). However, we do not know if this was because of continued drug efficacy or a rebound effect in the placebo group. (5) The adverse effects of ropinirole in patients with restless legs syndrome had already been observed in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, and included nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, a sudden urge to sleep, syncope, hypotension, and hallucinations. (6) An increase in the severity of restless legs symptoms, typically seen with levodopa, was not evaluated in clinical trials of ropinirole. Some cases have nevertheless been reported. They describe the appearance of symptoms increasingly early in the evening, then in the afternoon, or as a rebound effect in the morning or the latter part of the night. Their intensity increases and can affect other parts of the body. (7) In practice, ropinirole has a negative risk-benefit balance in restless legs syndrome, which is a minor health disorder.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Agonistas de Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Aprovação de Drogas , França , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Neurol ; 253 Suppl 4: IV22-8, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16944353

RESUMO

In the past few years, major advances have been made in the field of restless legs syndrome (RLS). New tools have been developed to assess the presence and severity of RLS and its complications. Furthermore new concepts of the phenotype are emerging.With a high likelihood a slight dopaminergic hypofunction contributes essentially to the pathophysiology of most phenotypes of RLS. Dopaminergic substitution either with L-DOPA or with dopamine agonists ameliorates symptoms in the large majority of patients. Too high of doses of either type of drug may be involved in the development of augmentation caused by treatment-induced alterations in dopaminergic neurotransmission. Dopaminergic agents are currently the agents of first choice to treat RLS, and large multicenter trials support the evidence of efficacy. Very careful tailoring of the dose is required to avoid the development of treatment complications, specifically augmentation.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/diagnóstico , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
18.
Prescrire Int ; 15(82): 54-7, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16604736

RESUMO

(1) When patients with Parkinson's disease who are taking levodopa develop motor fluctuations that do not respond to dose adjustments, the standard treatment is the addition of bromocriptine, a dopaminergic agonist. Evaluation of entacapone fails to show whether the risk-benefit balance of this catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor is at least as favourable as that of bromocriptine. (2) Tolcapone, another COMT inhibitor, is back on the French market after being withdrawn because of serious hepatic effects. The summary of product characteristics (SPC) specifies that tolcapone must only be used when entacapone treatment fails or is poorly tolerated. (3) Renewal of marketing authorisation was based on one clinical trial in which about half the patients were probably not resistant to entacapone. No difference in efficacy was found between tolcapone and entacapone. There is no firm evidence that tolcapone is effective in a significant number of patients in whom entacapone fails. (4) Placebo-controlled trials show that first-line treatment with tolcapone 100 mg to 200 mg 3 times a day reduces the duration of motor freezing ("off") periods, but the global impact of tolcapone on parkinsonism appears to be limited. (5) Unblinded randomised controlled trials have failed to show that tolcapone is more effective than bromocriptine or pergolide. There are no trials assessing the use of tolcapone in combination with dopamine agonists. (6) Adverse effects were frequent during clinical trials. They were mainly neurological and gastrointestinal, and differed from those associated with bromocriptine. In 1988, shortly after worldwide marketing of tolcapone, 3 cases of fatal fulminant hepatitis were reported among about 60 000 patients who had taken this drug. Some countries, including European Union member states, withdrew marketing authorisation. Other countries, including the United States, left tolcapone on the market but required stringent monitoring of liver function. Due to a lack of transparency on the part of both the manufacturer and the health authorities, we do not know if these measures reduced the risk of severe hepatitis. In the trial versus entacapone, one of the 75 patients treated with tolcapone 300 mg/day had an abnormal increase in serum transaminase activity. (7) In practice, tolcapone has a negative risk-benefit balance.


Assuntos
Benzofenonas/efeitos adversos , Nitrofenóis/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Antiparkinsonianos/administração & dosagem , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Benzofenonas/administração & dosagem , Benzofenonas/uso terapêutico , Bromocriptina/administração & dosagem , Bromocriptina/efeitos adversos , Bromocriptina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Agonistas de Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Hepatite/etiologia , Humanos , Nitrofenóis/administração & dosagem , Nitrofenóis/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
CNS Drug Rev ; 11(3): 253-72, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16389293

RESUMO

Dopamine agonists have become indispensable in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In every-day practice, however, the decision to select the best compound for an individual patient is rendered difficult because of the large number of substances available on the market. This review article provides a closer look at the experimental and clinical studies with ropinirole published so far. Ropinirole is a non-ergoline dopamine agonist which has been proven to be effective in both, monotherapy and combination therapy of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. In addition to ameliorating bradykinesia, rigor, and tremor, ropinirole facilitates the daily life and improves depressive moods of patients with Parkinson's disease. The long-term complications of levodopa are avoided, and problems commonly associated with levodopa treatment are reduced. Ropinirole appears to have a neuroprotective effect. In addition to Parkinson's disease, ropinirole has also been used successfully in the treatment of restless legs syndrome.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/farmacologia , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacologia , Indóis/farmacologia , Animais , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/química , Antiparkinsonianos/economia , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacocinética , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/química , Agonistas de Dopamina/economia , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacocinética , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Interações Medicamentosas , Humanos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/química , Indóis/economia , Indóis/farmacocinética , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Tremor/tratamento farmacológico
20.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 111(10-11): 1375-446, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15480844

RESUMO

Forty years after its introduction by Birkmayer and Hornykiewicz (1961), L-DOPA-based therapy of Parkinson's disease remains the central pillar in the management of the disorder. Nevertheless, it is not unproblematic, and dopamine receptor agonists play increasingly important roles in antiparkinsonian therapy. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of these agents are briefly reviewed and followed by a detailed summary of available literature concerning controlled trials in Parkinson's disease. It is concluded that there is little unequivocal evidence to suggest that any of the major dopamine receptor agonists should be invariably preferred in the therapy of Parkinson's disease; their application must be based on the needs and responses of individual patients.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacocinética , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacologia , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacocinética , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacologia , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA