Interlaboratory proficiency processing scheme in CSF aliquoting: implementation and assessment based on biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we tested to which extent possible between-center differences in standardized operating procedures (SOPs) for biobanking of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples influence the homogeneity of the resulting aliquots and, consequently, the concentrations of the centrally analyzed selected Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. METHODS: Proficiency processing samples (PPSs), prepared by pooling of four individual CSF samples, were sent to 10 participating centers, which were asked to perform aliquoting of the PPSs into two secondary aliquots (SAs) under their local SOPs. The resulting SAs were shipped to the central laboratory, where the concentrations of amyloid beta (Aß) 1-42, pTau181, and albumin were measured in one run with validated routine analytical methods. Total variability of the concentrations, and its within-center and between-center components, were analyzed with hierarchical regression models. RESULTS: We observed neglectable variability in the concentrations of pTau181 and albumin across the centers and the aliquots. In contrast, the variability of the Aß1-42 concentrations was much larger (overall coefficient of variation 31%), with 28% of the between-laboratory component and 10% of the within-laboratory (i.e., between-aliquot) component. We identified duration of the preparation of the aliquots and the centrifugation force as two potential confounders influencing within-center variability and biomarker concentrations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Proficiency processing schemes provide objective evidence for the most critical preanalytical variables. Standardization of these variables may significantly enhance the quality of the collected biospecimens. Studies utilizing retrospective samples collected under different local SOPs need to consider such differences in the statistical evaluations of the data.

Human African trypanosomiasis: quantitative and qualitative assessment of intrathecal immune response.

Quantitative and qualitative techniques for assessment of the intrathecal humoral immune response in human African trypanosomiasis were compared, and their diagnostic potential for detection of the meningo-encephalitic stage of the disease was evaluated. Total and trypanosome specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM intrathecal synthesis were studied in paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples of 38 trypanosomiasis patients and in three controls using Reiber's formulae. The presence of CSF-specific oligoclonal IgG and of trypanosome-specific antibodies was determined using iso-electric focusing followed by immunoblotting and antigen-driven immunoblots. The intrathecal IgG fraction (16% positive) and oligoclonal IgG detection (24% positive) were insensitive for detection of an intrathecal humoral immune response. Trypanosome-specific IgG synthesis, reflected by the IgG antibody index (AI) (26% positive), was confirmed by the presence of oligoclonal specific IgG (47% positive), but the latter was more sensitive. Although the detection technique failed for oligoclonal IgM, the intrathecal IgM fraction (42% positive) and the IgM AI (32% positive) indicated that the meningo-encephalitic stage of the disease is characterized by a dominant intrathecal IgM response, which was higher than the IgG response. The highest combination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the meningo-encephalitic stage of trypanosomiasis was observed for quantitative IgM determinations.

External quality assessment in clinical neurochemistry: survey of analysis for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins based on CSF/serum quotients.

Participants (230) from Germany and 20 laboratories in 11 European countries took part in a newly designed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) survey distributed by INSTAND. Conventional proficiency testing for albumin, IgG, IgA, and IgM in CSF and serum, for total protein in CSF, and for oligoclonal IgG in CSF and serum was combined with evaluation and interpretation of CSF/serum quotients in quotient diagrams. The correct detection of a blood-CSF barrier dysfunction and the pattern of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis was judged. The accuracy of CSF/serum quotients and their clinically relevant interpretation was given first priority as a new concept in quality assessment. The main result of the surveys was to confirm that CSF/serum quotients of proteins represent method-independent values approaching the quality of reference values. This finding has consequences for internal quality control of CSF analysis and for accreditation bodies. The sensitivity of the methods for quantifying IgA and IgM in CSF and for detecting oligoclonal IgG fractions is discussed.