[Arterial spin labeling in assessment of interstitial fibrosis in renal allografts].

Objective: To explore the feasibility and application value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in evaluating the degree of renal fibrosis after kidney transplantation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Renal transplant recipients who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from December 2021 to December 2022 were enrolled. All participants underwent ASL scan, and the values of renal cortical renal blood flow (RBF) were measured through post-processing software. The participants were divided into different groups according to the Banff interstitial fibrosis score (ci score) of the transplanted kidneys, and then relevant indicators were compared. One-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in renal cortical RBF among the groups. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between renal cortical RBF and ci score of the transplanted kidney. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the diagnostic effectiveness of renal cortical RBF and laboratory indicators for distinguishing varying degrees of fibrosis in transplanted kidneys. The Delong test was utilized to compare the area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) were included in the study, with a mean age of (44.6±10.8) years. All patients were divided into 4 groups: ci0 group (ci score=0, 11 cases), ci1 group (ci score=1, 21 cases), ci2 group (ci score=2, 20 cases), and ci3 group (ci score=3, 8 cases). With an increase in the degree of fibrosis in the transplanted kidney, there was a corresponding decrease in the renal cortical RBF value. The differences in renal cortical RBF values among the 4 groups were statistically significant[ci0 group: (214.9±28.5) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci1 group: (181.7±29.3) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci2 group: (158.8±39.2) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci3 group: (123.1±27.2) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; F=14.02, P<0.001]. The renal cortical RBF was moderately negatively correlated with the ci score (r=-0.644, P<0.001). The AUC for discriminating between ci0 and ci1-3 of renal cortical RBF and 24-hour urine protein was 0.881 (95%CI: 0.772-0.950) and 0.680 (95%CI: 0.547-0.795), respectively. The AUC for renal cortical RBF was significantly higher than that for 24-hour urine protein (P=0.047). The renal cortical RBF can distinguish between ci0-1 and ci2-3, as well as ci0-2 and ci3, with the corresponding AUC value of 0.796 (95%CI: 0.673-0.889) and 0.900 (95%CI: 0.795-0.963), respectively. Conclusion: ASL can quantitatively assess renal blood perfusion in transplanted kidneys and demonstrates high operational efficacy in distinguishing varying degrees of fibrosis in the transplanted kidneys.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Avance® allograft for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries in the USA.

Aim: Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a debilitating condition with significant associated morbidity, and which places a substantial socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Recently, allograft has emerged as a viable surgical alternative to autograft for the treatment of PNI. This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft) compared with autograft for the peripheral nerve repair, from a US payer perspective. Methods: A Markov cohort model was developed to consider the treatment pathways followed by a patient population undergoing a single transected nerve repair with either allograft, or autograft. The marginal difference in meaningful recovery (MR) (effectiveness), and costs, between the two groups were estimated over a lifetime horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to consider the uncertainty surrounding the base-case input parameter values and their effect on the overall incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: The base-case analysis indicates that there is a small difference in the average probability of MR between the two groups (75.15% vs 70.46%; +4.69% with allograft). Allograft also results in cost savings ($12,677 vs $14,023; -$-1346 with allograft) compared with autograft. Deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that the costs of the initial surgical procedures are the main drivers of incremental cost, but that the intervention is likely to be cost saving compared with autograft regardless of the parameter variations made. Conclusion: The use of allograft with the Avance Nerve Graft has the potential to be a cost-effective alternative to autograft for the surgical treatment of PNI in the USA.

Health care costs among patients with hematologic malignancies receiving allogeneic transplants: a US payer perspective.

ABSTRACT: Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) require extensive care. Using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (2016 Q1-2020 Q2), we quantified the costs of care and assessed real-world complication rates among commercially insured US patients diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy and aged between 12 and 64 years undergoing inpatient allo-HCT. Health care resource use and costs were assessed from 100 days before HCT to 100 days after HCT. Primary hospitalization was defined as the time from HCT until first discharge date. Incidence of complications was assessed using medical billing codes from HCT date to 100 days after HCT. Among the 1082 patients analyzed, allo-HCT grafts included peripheral blood (79%), bone marrow (11%), and umbilical cord blood (3%). In the 100 days after HCT, 52% of the patients experienced acute graft-versus-host disease; 21% had cytomegalovirus infection. The median primary hospitalization length of stay (LOS) was 28 days; 31% required readmission in first 100 days after HCT. Across the transplant period (14 days pretransplant to 100 days posttransplant), 44% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit with a median LOS of 29 days. Among those with noncapitated health plans (n = 937), median cost of all-cause health care per patient during the transplant period was $331 827, which was driven by primary hospitalization and readmission. Additionally, the predicted median incremental costs per additional day in an inpatient setting increased with longer LOS (eg, $3381-$4071, 10th-20th day.) Thus, decreasing length of primary hospitalization and avoiding readmissions should significantly reduce the allo-HCT cost of care.

Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant.

BACKGROUND: In pediatric heart transplant (PHT), cardiac catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is standard for diagnosing acute rejection (AR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) but is costly and invasive. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to noninvasively identify differences in PHT patients with AR and CAV. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at three children's hospitals. Data were collected from surveillance EMB or EMB for-cause AR. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent diagnoses of AR and CAV, CMR obtained >7days from AR diagnosis, they had EMB negative AR, or could not undergo contrasted, unsedated CMR. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups: (1) No AR or CAV (Healthy), (2) AR, (3) CAV. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (median age 17years [IQR 15-19]) 10 (17%) with AR, and 11 (19%) with CAV. AR subjects had worse left ventricular ejection fraction compared to Healthy patients (p = 0.001). Global circumferential strain (GCS) was worse in AR (p = 0.054) and CAV (p = 0.019), compared to Healthy patients. ECV, native T1, and T2 z-scores were elevated in patients with AR. CONCLUSIONS: CMR was able to identify differences between CAV and AR. CAV subjects had normal global function but abnormal GCS which may suggest subclinical dysfunction. AR patients have abnormal function and tissue characteristics consistent with edema (elevated ECV, native T1 and T2 z-scores). Characterization of CMR patterns is critical for the development of noninvasive biomarkers for PHT and may decrease dependence on EMB.

Molecular monitoring of lung allograft health: is it ready for routine clinical use?

Maintenance of long-term lung allograft health in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) requires a fine balancing act between providing sufficient immunosuppression to reduce the risk of rejection whilst at the same time not over-immunosuppressing individuals and exposing them to the myriad of immunosuppressant drug side-effects that can cause morbidity and mortality. At present, lung transplant physicians only have limited and rather blunt tools available to assist them with this task. Although therapeutic drug monitoring provides clinically useful information about single time point and longitudinal exposure of LTRs to immunosuppressants, it lacks precision in determining the functional level of immunosuppression that an individual is experiencing. There is a significant gap in our ability to monitor lung allograft health and therefore tailor optimal personalised immunosuppression regimens. Molecular diagnostics performed on blood, bronchoalveolar lavage or lung tissue that can detect early signs of subclinical allograft injury, differentiate rejection from infection or distinguish cellular from humoral rejection could offer clinicians powerful tools in protecting lung allograft health. In this review, we look at the current evidence behind molecular monitoring in lung transplantation and ask if it is ready for routine clinical use. Although donor-derived cell-free DNA and tissue transcriptomics appear to be the techniques with the most immediate clinical potential, more robust data are required on their performance and additional clinical value beyond standard of care.

Cost-effectiveness of decellularised bone allograft compared with fresh-frozen bone allograft for acetabular impaction bone grafting during a revision hip arthroplasty in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: Fresh-frozen allograft is the gold-standard bone graft material used during revision hip arthroplasty. However, new technology has been developed to manufacture decellularised bone with potentially better graft incorporation. As these grafts cost more to manufacture, the aim of this cost-effectiveness study was to estimate whether the potential health benefit of decellularised bone allograft outweighs their increased cost. STUDY DESIGN: A Markov model was constructed to estimate the costs and the quality-adjusted life years of impaction bone grafting during a revision hip arthroplasty. SETTING: This study took the perspective of the National Health Service in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: The Markov model includes patients undergoing a revision hip arthroplasty in the UK. INTERVENTION: Impaction bone grafting during a revision hip arthroplasty using either decellularised bone allograft or fresh-frozen allograft. MEASURES: Outcome measures included: total costs and quality-adjusted life years of both interventions over the lifetime of the model; and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for both graft types, using base case parameters, univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic analysis. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the base case model was found to be £270 059 per quality-adjusted life year. Univariate sensitivity analysis found that changing the discount rate, the decellularised bone graft cost, age of the patient cohort and the revision rate all had a significant effect on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: As there are no clinical studies of impaction bone grafting using a decellularised bone allograft, there is a high level of uncertainty around the costs of producing a decellularised bone allograft and the potential health benefits. However, if a decellularised bone graft was manufactured for £2887 and lowered the re-revision rate to less than 64 cases per year per 10 000 revision patients, then it would most likely be cost-effective compared with fresh-frozen allograft.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction Is Associated with Significant Disability after Lung Transplantation-A Burden of Disease Analysis in 1025 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death after the first postoperative years of lung transplantation (LTx). OBJECTIVE: To assess the number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per patient with severe CLAD. METHODS: The clinical and demographic data of patients who received their lung transplantation between 2010 and 2020 in the Hanover Medical School (Germany) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1025 lung transplant patients were followed for a median of 51 months (4.25 years); the median age at transplantation was 52.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 19) years. More than a quarter of transplant patients (271/1025 or 26.4%) developed CLAD, mostly (60%) of the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) phenotype. Of the CLAD patients, 99, or 36.5%, suffered from significant disability, which on average occurred after 2 years (IQR 2.55). The survival of CLAD patients with disability after transplantation was significantly lower compared to that of patients without CLAD (median 4.04 versus 5.41 years). Adjusted to the DALY estimation approach, CLAD patients lost 1.29 life years (YLL) and lived for 0.8 years with their disability (YLD), adding up to 2.09 DALYs (range 1.99-2.72) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: CLAD after lung transplantation is a major public health problem and is associated with substantial disability and costs. Further work is needed to develop therapeutic interventions that reduce its development.

Application of platelet-rich fibrin and freeze-dried bone allograft following apicoectomy: A comparative assessment of radiographic healing.

Background: Apicoectomy conceptualizes surgically maintaining a tooth with an endodontic lesion that cannot be resolved by conventional endodontic (re-) treatment. To achieve this, continuous improvement in surgical techniques, materials and instruments is being done to enhance the outcome of periapical endodontic surgeries. The purpose of this study was to compare, radiographically, the healing kinetics of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in patients undergoing apicoectomy. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients (aged 18-40 years) were included in the study and randomly assigned to groups A or B, where they received PRF or FDBA, respectively. Following apicoectomy, PRF gel and FDBA graft were prepared and placed in the osseous defect followed by placement of PRF membrane for graft stabilization and flap closure. Radiographic follow-up was done at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months for evaluation of healing using Molven's criteria. Statistical analysis was done with Pearson's and McNemar's Chi-square tests. Results: A highly significant difference (P = 0.002) in radiographic healing was observed at 6 months. Complete healing was observed in 50% of cases in Group A whereas in Group B, none of the cases presented with complete radiographic healing. However, at the end of 12 months, complete radiographic healing was observed in both groups. Conclusion: Our data suggest that PRF accelerates bone healing as compared to FDBA and is both time and cost-efficient.

The histological assessment of new bone formation with zolendronic acid loaded bone allograft in rabbit femoral bone defect.

The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the effect of zolendronic acid (ZOL) combined with bone allograft prepared using the Marburg Bone Bank System on bone formation in the implant remodeling zone. Femoral bone defects with a diameter of 5 mm and a depth of 10 mm were created in 32 rabbits. Animals were divided into 2 similar groups: Group 1 (control), where defects were filled with bone allograft, and Group 2, where allograft was combined with ZOL. Eight animals from each group were sacrificed at 14- and 60-days post-surgery and bone defect healing was assessed using histopathological and histomorphometric analyses after 14 and 60 days. The results showed that new bone formation within the bone allograft was significantly greater in the control group than in the ZOL-treated group after 14 and 60 days (p<0.05). In conclusion, local co-administration of ZOL on heat-treated allograft inhibits allograft resorption and new bone formation in the bone defect.

Digital Nerve Injury: Assessment and Treatment.

Undertreated digital nerve injuries may result in sensory deficits and pain. Early recognition and treatment will optimize outcomes, and providers should maintain a high index of suspicion when assessing patients with open wounds. Acute, sharp lacerations may be amenable to direct repair while avulsion injuries or delayed repairs require adequate resection and bridging with nerve autograft, processed nerve allograft, or conduits. Conduits are most appropriate for gaps less than 15 mm, and processed nerve allografts have demonstrated reliable outcomes across longer gaps.

Value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality for the assessment of transplanted kidneys. This study aims to investigate the ability of conventional US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in assessing renal allograft function and prognosis. METHODS: A total of 78 consecutive renal allograft recipients were enrolled. Patients were classified as normal allograft function (n = 41) and allograft dysfunction (n = 37) groups. All patients underwent US and parameters were measured. The independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and Cox regression analysis were used. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, cortical echo intensity (EI) and cortical peak intensity (PI) were determinant US parameters for renal allograft dysfunction (p = .024 and p = .003, respectively). The combination of cortical EI and PI showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of .785 (p < .001). Of 78 patients (median follow-up: 20mo), 16 (20.5%) exhibited composite end points. Cortical PI had a general prediction accuracy with an AUROC of .691, sensitivity of 87.5%, and specificity of 46.8% at the threshold of 22.08 dB in predicting prognosis (p = .019). The combination of estimated-glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) and PI in predicting prognosis showed an AUROC of .845 with a cut-off value of .836, sensitivity of 84.0%, and specificity of 67.3% (p < .001). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that cortical EI and PI are useful US parameters for evaluating renal allograft function and e-GFR combined with PI may provide a more accurate predictor of survival.

Is Surgical Repair With Nerve Allograft More Cost-Effective Than Non-Surgical Management for Persistent Trigeminal Neuropathy? Initial Assessment With Markov Model.

PURPOSE: Persistent trigeminal neuropathy (PTN) is associated with high rates of depression, loss of work, and decreased quality of life (QoL). Nerve allograft repair can achieve functional sensory recovery in a predictable manner; however, it bears significant upfront costs. In patients suffering from PTN, is surgical repair with allogeneic nerve graft, when compared to non-surgical therapy, a more cost-effective treatment option? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was constructed with TreeAge Pro Healthcare 2022 (TreeAge Software, Massachusetts) to estimate the direct and indirect costs for PTN. The model ran for 40 years with 1-year-cycles on a 40-year-old model patient with persistent inferior alveolar or lingual nerve injury (S0 to S2+) at 3 months without signs of improvement, and without dysesthesia or neuropathic pain (NPP). The 2 treatment arms were surgery with nerve allograft versus non-surgical management. There were 3 disease states, functional sensory recovery (S3 to S4), hypoesthesia/anesthesia (S0 to S2+), and NPP. Direct surgical costs were calculated using the 2022 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and verified with standard institutional billing practices. Non-surgical treatment direct costs (follow-up, specialist referral, medications, imaging) and indirect costs (QoL, loss of employment) were determined from historical data and the literature. Direct surgical costs for allograft repair were $13,291. State-specific direct costs for hypoesthesia/anesthesia were $2,127.84 per year, and $3,168.24 for NPP per year. State-specific indirect costs included decreased labor force participation, absenteeism, and decreased QoL. RESULTS: Surgical treatment with nerve allograft was more effective and had a lower long-term cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -10,751.94, indicating surgical treatment should be utilized based on efficiency and cost. With a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000, the net monetary benefits of surgical treatment are $1,158,339 compared to $830,654 for non-surgical treatment. With a standard threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 50,000, the sensitivity analysis shows that surgical treatment would remain the preferred choice based on efficiency even if surgical costs were doubled. CONCLUSION: Despite high initial costs of surgical treatment with nerve allograft for PTN, surgical intervention with nerve allograft is a more cost-effective treatment option when compared to non-surgical therapy.

Validation of automatically measured T1 map cortico-medullary difference (ΔT1) for eGFR and fibrosis assessment in allograft kidneys.

MRI T1-mapping is an important non-invasive tool for renal diagnosis. Previous work shows that ΔT1 (cortex-medullary difference in T1) has significant correlation with interstitial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) allograft patients. However, measuring cortico-medullary values by manually drawing ROIs over cortex and medulla (a gold standard method) is challenging, time-consuming, subjective and requires human training. Moreover, such subjective ROI placement may also affect the work reproducibility. This work proposes a deep learning-based 2D U-Net (RCM U-Net) to auto-segment the renal cortex and medulla of CKD allograft kidney T1 maps. Furthermore, this study presents a correlation of automatically measured ΔT1 values with eGFR and percentage fibrosis in allograft kidneys. Also, the RCM U-Net correlation results are compared with the manual ROI correlation analysis. The RCM U-Net has been trained and validated on T1 maps from 40 patients (n = 2400 augmented images) and tested on 10 patients (n = 600 augmented images). The RCM U-Net segmentation results are compared with the standard VGG16, VGG19, ResNet34 and ResNet50 networks with U-Net as backbone. For clinical validation of the RCM U-Net segmentation, another set of 114 allograft kidneys patient's cortex and medulla were automatically segmented to measure the ΔT1 values and correlated with eGFR and fibrosis. Overall, the RCM U-Net showed 50% less Mean Absolute Error (MAE), 16% better Dice Coefficient (DC) score and 12% improved results in terms of Sensitivity (SE) over conventional CNNs (i.e. VGG16, VGG19, ResNet34 and ResNet50) while the Specificity (SP) and Accuracy (ACC) did not show significant improvement (i.e. 0.5% improvement) for both cortex and medulla segmentation. For eGFR and fibrosis assessment, the proposed RCM U-Net correlation coefficient (r) and R-square (R2) was better correlated (r = -0.2, R2 = 0.041 with p = 0.039) to eGFR than manual ROI values (r = -0.19, R2 = 0.037 with p = 0.051). Similarly, the proposed RCM U-Net had noticeably better r and R2 values (r = 0.25, R2 = 0.065 with p = 0.007) for the correlation with the renal percentage fibrosis than the Manual ROI results (r = 0.3, R2 = 0.091 and p = 0.0013). Using a linear mixed model, T1 was significantly higher in the medulla than in the cortex (p<0.0001) and significantly lower in patients with cellular rejection when compared to both patients without rejection and those with humoral rejection (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in T1 between patients with and without humoral rejection (p = 0.43), nor between the types of T1 measurements (Gold standard manual versus automated RCM U-Net) (p = 0.7). The cortico-medullary area ratio measured by the RCM U-Net was significantly increased in case of cellular rejection by comparison to humoral rejection (1.6 +/- 0.39 versus 0.99 +/- 0.32, p = 0.019). In conclusion, the proposed RCM U-Net provides more robust auto-segmented cortex and medulla than the other standard CNNs allowing a good correlation of ΔT1 with eGFR and fibrosis as reported in literature as well as the differentiation of cellular and humoral transplant rejection. Therefore, the proposed approach is a promising alternative to the gold standard manual ROI method to measure T1 values without user interaction, which helps to reduce analysis time and improves reproducibility.

Serological and histopathological assessment of galactose-deficient immunoglobulin A1 deposition in kidney allografts: A multicenter prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy is an important risk factor for kidney allograft loss. However, there is no classification system for IgA deposition in kidney allografts based on serological and histopathological evaluation of galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1). This study aimed to establish a classification system for IgA deposition in kidney allografts based on serological and histological evaluation of Gd-IgA1. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study included 106 adult kidney transplant recipients in whom an allograft biopsy was performed. Serum and urinary Gd-IgA1 levels were investigated in 46 transplant recipients who were IgA-positive and classified into four subgroups according to the presence or absence of mesangial Gd-IgA1 (KM55 antibody) deposits and C3. RESULTS: Minor histological changes without an acute lesion were observed in recipients with IgA deposition. Fourteen (30%) of the 46 IgA-positive recipients were KM55-positive and 18 (39%) were C3-positive. The C3 positivity rate was higher in the KM55-positive group. Serum and urinary Gd-IgA1 levels were significantly higher in KM55-positive/C3-positive recipients than in the other three groups with IgA deposition. Disappearance of IgA deposits was confirmed in 10 of 15 IgA-positive recipients in whom a further allograft biopsy was performed. The serum Gd-IgA1 level at the time of enrollment was significantly higher in recipients in whom IgA deposition continued than in those in whom it disappeared (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The population with IgA deposition after kidney transplantation is serologically and pathologically heterogeneous. Serological and histological assessment of Gd-IgA1 is useful for identifying cases that should be carefully observed.

A Five-Year Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Synthetic Cage Versus Allograft Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cost-utility analysis. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-analysis comparing synthetic cage (SC) versus allograft (Allo) over a five-year time horizon. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SC and Allo are two commonly used interbody choices for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Previous analyses comparative analyses have reached mixed conclusions regarding their cost-effectiveness, yet recent estimates provide high-quality evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-analysis model comparing the use of Allo versus SC was developed for a hypothetical 60-year-old patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing single-level ACDF surgery. A comprehensive literature review was performed to estimate probabilities, costs (2020 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over a five-year period. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation of 1000 patients was carried out to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefits. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate the contribution of individual parameters to uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: The use of Allo was favored in 81.6% of the iterations at a societal willing-to-pay threshold of 50,000 USD/QALY. Allo dominated (higher net QALYs and lower net costs) in 67.8% of the iterations. The incremental net monetary benefits in the Allo group was 2650 USD at a willing-to-pay threshold of 50,000 USD/QALY. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of the index surgery was the only factor which significantly contributed to uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Cost-utility analysis suggests that Allo maybe a more cost-effective option compared with SCs in adult patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Assessment of renal allograft rejection with diffusion tensor imaging.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of DTI in differentiation of renal allograft rejection from well-functioning stable allograft, using fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. METHODS: In this prospective study, 22 transplant recipients with well-functioning stable allograft (group A) and 20 patients with renal allograft rejection (group B + C) were recruited over a period of 19 months from January 2018 to July 2019. DTI-MRI was performed in all the patients, and FA and ADC values were measured in cortical and medullary regions of the transplanted kidney. On biopsy, graft rejection was classified as acute (group B) (n = 7) and chronic graft rejection (group C) (n = 13) based on the BANNF scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v.14.0. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference between group A and group B + C was noted for cortical (p < 0.001), and medullary (p = 0.003) FA values, and cortical (p = 0.020), and medullary (p = 0.046) ADC values. Cortical(p < 0.001) and Medullary(p = 0.020) FA values showed statistically significant difference between group A and group C, and cortical FA value(p = 0.012) also showed statistically significant difference between group B and group C. AUC (to differentiate between renal allograft rejection and well-functioning stable allograft) for cortical, and medullary FA values and cortical and medullary ADC values were 0.853(p < 0.001), 0.757(p = 0.004), 0.709(p = 0.021) and 0.736(p = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSION AND ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DTI is a promising functional MRI technique for the non-invasive assessment of renal allograft function. Diffusion parameters, such as FA and ADC values, can be useful in the differentiation of renal allograft rejection from well-functioning stable allograft.