An assessment of the centrally acting muscle relaxant tolperisone on driving ability and cognitive effects compared to placebo and cyclobenzaprine.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Tolperisone is a centrally acting muscle relaxant under development in the United States as a treatment for acute and painful symptoms of muscle spasms. The objective of this three-way, randomized, blinded, three-period crossover study was to assess the safety and cognitive effects of tolperisone compared to placebo and the widely used muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms to receive tolperisone (150 mg), cyclobenzaprine (10 mg) or placebo 3 times per day (TID) in 3 separate study periods. Subjects completed a driving test on the Cognitive Research Corporation's Driving Simulator (CRCDS Mini-Sim), a validated driving simulator, on day 1 at time to maximum plasma concentration, on day 2 before the morning dose of study drug and on day 3 at steady state following the morning dose. Subjects were assessed on various driving parameters and on a computer-administered digit-symbol substitution test (CogScreen symbol digit coding test). The driving scenario is a monotonous 100 km highway route on which subjects are instructed to maintain speed and lane position. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The performance of subjects who had received tolperisone was not significantly different from those who had received placebo in terms of the primary end point: standard deviation of lateral position, a measure of weaving. Subjects who had received tolperisone also performed comparably to those who had received placebo on a range of secondary measures assessing driving ability, cognition and psychomotor performance. In contrast, subjects who had received cyclobenzaprine showed significant impairment compared to placebo (P < .01) on the primary end point of standard deviation of lateral position and on the majority of the secondary end points of driving ability. Despite their markedly poorer driving performance after receiving cyclobenzaprine, few subjects reported feeling unsafe to drive on day 1 (10.3%) and day 2 (3.4%). The incidence of adverse events was similar for tolperisone (36.4%) and placebo (29.0%) and was greater for cyclobenzaprine (45.4%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Subjects who received tolperisone (150 mg TID) experienced no impact on various measures of driving, self-reported sleepiness and cognition measures compared to placebo, in contrast to those who received the widely used muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine (10 mg TID).

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467].

BACKGROUND: Low back pain and its associated incapacitating effects constitute an important healthcare and socioeconomic problem, as well as being one of the main causes of disability among adults of working age. The prevalence of non-specific low back pain is very high among the general population, and 60-70% of adults are believed to have suffered this problem at some time. Nevertheless, few randomised clinical trials have been made of the efficacy and efficiency of acupuncture with respect to acute low back pain. The present study is intended to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for acute low back pain in terms of the improvement reported on the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) on low back pain incapacity, to estimate the specific and non-specific effects produced by the technique, and to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS/DESIGN: Randomised four-branch controlled multicentre prospective study made to compare semi-standardised real acupuncture, sham acupuncture (acupuncture at non-specific points), placebo acupuncture and conventional treatment. The patients are blinded to the real, sham and placebo acupuncture treatments. Patients in the sample present symptoms of non specific acute low back pain, with a case history of 2 weeks or less, and will be selected from working-age patients, whether in paid employment or not, referred by General Practitioners from Primary Healthcare Clinics to the four clinics participating in this study. In order to assess the primary and secondary result measures, the patients will be requested to fill in a questionnaire before the randomisation and again at 3, 12 and 48 weeks after starting the treatment. The primary result measure will be the clinical relevant improvement (CRI) at 3 weeks after randomisation. We define CRI as a reduction of 35% or more in the RMQ results. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to obtain further evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture on acute low back pain and to isolate the specific and non-specific effects of the treatment.

Assessment of differential blockade by amitriptyline and its N-methyl derivative in different species by different routes.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the duration of local anesthesia and/or creating greater differential blockade (i.e., selective block of pain-transmitting nerve fibers) has been attempted by modifying currently available agents. Most drugs show a different profile depending on the model or species studied. This study was designed to investigate the differential nerve-blocking properties of amitriptyline and its quaternary ammonium derivative in rats and sheep. METHODS: The Na+ channel-blocking properties of N-methyl amitriptyline were determined with the patch clamp technique in cultured GH(3) cells. Various functions (motor, nociception, proprioception-ataxia) were compared in rats (spinal and sciatic nerve blockade) and sheep (spinal blockade) with amitriptyline, N-methyl amitriptyline, lidocaine, and bupivacaine (partially from historical data). RESULTS: In vitro testing revealed N-methyl amitriptyline to be a potent Na+ channel blocker similar to amitriptyline but with a much longer duration of action. All drug concentrations tested in both the sciatic nerve model and the spinal block model produced no significant differential blockade in rats. Three of six rats in the 20-mM N-methyl amitriptyline group showed residual blockade 4 days after sciatic nerve injection. However, in the sheep spinal model, amitriptyline and in particular N-methyl amitriptyline displayed significant differential blockade at most time points. Sheep data for lidocaine and bupivacaine seemed to be more comparable to the clinical experience in humans than did rat data. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline and N-methyl amitriptyline are potent Na+ channel blockers and show greater differential blockade in sheep than in rats. This differential blockade in sheep is greater than that produced by lidocaine or bupivacaine.

Evaluating the efficacy of a combination therapy.

Standard multiple comparison techniques do not adequately address the situation in which one must demonstrate a combination therapy's superiority to both of its components. This paper proposes several alternative tests to deal with this situation, and evaluates the tests with a Monte Carlo sampling experiment that compares the actual with the nominal significance levels of the tests. Data from a clinical trial that compares the efficacy of a combination analgesic/muscle relaxant to its components and placebo in the treatment of low back pain and spasm illustrate the tests.