Out-of-pocket costs and affordability of upper limb prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Given the funding policies in the Department of Veterans Affairs, the affordability of prostheses may be less of a concern among Veterans as compared to civilians. OBJECTIVES: Compare rates of out-of-pocket prosthesis-related payments for Veterans and non-Veterans with upper limb amputation (ULA), develop and validate a measure of prosthesis affordability, and evaluate the impact of affordability on prosthesis nonuse. STUDY DESIGN: Telephone survey of 727 persons with ULA; 76% Veterans and 24% non-Veterans. METHODS: Odds of paying out-of-pocket costs for Veterans compared with non-Veterans were computed using logistic regression. Cognitive and pilot testing resulted in a new scale, evaluated using confirmatory factor and Rasch analysis. Proportions of respondents who cited affordability as a reason for never using or abandoning a prosthesis were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty percent of those who ever used a prosthesis paid out-of-pocket costs. Veterans had 0.20 odds (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.30) of paying out-of-pocket costs compared with non-Veterans. Confirmatory factor analysis supported unidimensionality of the 4-item Prosthesis Affordability scale. Rasch person reliability was 0.78. Cronbach alpha was 0.87. Overall, 14% of prosthesis never-users said affordability was a reason for nonuse; 9.6% and 16.5% of former prosthesis users said affordability of repairs or replacement, respectively, was a reason for abandonment. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket prosthesis costs were paid by 20% of those sample, with Veterans less likely to incur costs. The Prosthesis Affordability scale developed in this study was reliable and valid for persons with ULA. Prosthesis affordability was a common reason for never using or abandoning prostheses.

Phantom limb syndrome: Assessment of psychiatric and medical comorbidities associated with Phantom pain in 44,028 below knee amputees.

INTRODUCTION: Phantom limb syndrome is a debilitating complication after extremity amputation that poses significant challenges to recovery. This study aims to examine the relationship between phantom limb syndrome and mental and physical comorbidities, including a comparison between phantom limb pain and phantom limb syndrome without pain in below knee amputees. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent below knee amputation of the lower extremity in the PearlDiver database, as identified using CPT codes. Analysis was carried out to evaluate the absence or presence of phantom limb syndrome. Matched bivariate analysis accounting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and region was used to assess whether the presence of pain in phantom limb syndrome patients was associated with increased comorbidity. RESULTS: In total, 44,028 patients with below knee amputation were examined: 95% (42,493 patients) did not develop phantom limb syndrome while 4.8% (1,535 patients) of patients did develop phantom limb syndrome. Phantom limb syndrome was significantly associated with increased odds of coexistent major depressive disorder (OR = 1.86, p <0.0001), generalized anxiety disorder (OR = 2.14, p = 0.04), posttraumatic stress disorder (OR = 1.7, p <0.0001), suicidal ideation (OR = 1.62, p <0.0001), obesity (OR = 1.28, p = 0.0007), osteoarthritis (OR = 1.53, p <0.0001), osteoporosis (OR = 1.64, p <0.0001), and low back pain (OR = 2.31, p <0.0001). Analysis of patient cohorts of phantom limb syndrome with pain and those without pain did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the presence of pain and any dependent variable. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation of over 44,000 patients with below knee amputation revealed that patients with phantom limb syndrome exhibit significantly higher rate of psychiatric comorbidities compared to those without documented phantom limb pain. Suicidal ideation, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder were especially common, and consequently a multi-disciplinary approach to management is essential.

Psychometric Assessment of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale for People With Lower-Limb Amputation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the psychometric properties of the 25- and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scales (CD-RISC25, CD-RISC10) for people with lower-limb amputation (LLA) in middle age or later, and (2) describe relationships of the CD-RISC with biopsychosocial, sociodemographic, and health variables. METHODS: Participants were included if their most recent LLA was 1 or more years prior, if they were independently walking with a prosthesis, and if they were between 45 and 88 years of age (N = 122; mean = 62.5 years of age [SD = 8]; 59.5 [mean = 58] months since LLA; 88.5% male; 82.0% with dysvascular etiology; 68.0% with unilateral transtibial LLA). Psychometric analyses included assessment of skewness, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and agreement between versions. Correlation analyses were used to determine associations between the CD-RISC with disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, life-space, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, social support, sociodemographic, and health variables. Additionally, quartiles of participants were identified using CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 scores and compared using ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons for disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, and life-space. RESULTS: Skewness, floor, and ceiling effects of both CD-RISC versions were acceptable. Both versions of the CD-RISC were internally consistent (CD-RISC25: α = .92; CD-RISC10: α = .89). The CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 were highly correlated with disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy (r = 0.52-0.67). CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 quartile differences, especially the lowest quartile, were identified for disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, and life-space. CONCLUSION: The CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 have acceptable psychometric properties for use with people who have LLA. CD-RISC scores are associated with clinically relevant biopsychosocial measures targeted by physical therapist intervention following LLA. IMPACT: The CD-RISC may be an appropriate tool to measure resilience following LLA.

User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.

OBJECTIVE: Considering the high rejection rates of upper limb prostheses, it is important to determine which prosthesis fits best the needs of each user. The introduction of the multi-grip prostheses hands (MHP), which have functional advantages but are also more expensive, has made prosthesis selection even harder. Therefore, we aimed to identify user opinions on factors determining prosthesis choice of persons with major unilateral upper limb defects in order to facilitate a more optimal fit between user and prosthesis. METHODS: A qualitative meta-synthesis using a 'best-fit framework' approach was performed by searching five databases (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019126973). Studies were considered eligible if they contained qualitative content about adults with major unilateral upper limb defects experienced in using commercially available upper limb prostheses and focused on upper limb prosthesis users' opinions. Results of the meta-synthesis were validated with end-users (n = 11) in a focus group. RESULTS: Out of 6247 articles, 19 studies were included. An overview of six main themes ('physical', 'activities and participation', 'mental', 'social', 'rehabilitation, cost and prosthetist services' and 'prosthesis related factors') containing 86 subthemes that could affect prosthesis choice was created. Of these subthemes, 19 were added by the focus group. Important subthemes were 'work/school', 'functionality' and 'reactions from public'. Opinions of MHP-users were scarce. MHPs were experienced as more dexterous and life-like but also as less robust and difficult to control. CONCLUSION: The huge number of factors that could determine upper limb prosthesis choice explains that preferences vary greatly. The created overview can be of great value to identify preferences and facilitate user-involvement in the selection process. Ultimately, this may contribute to a more successful match between user and prosthesis, resulting in a decrease of abandonment and increase of cost-effectiveness.

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Reintegration to Normal Living Index in Amputees.

In our country, outcome measures are needed to evaluate the results of occupational therapy in amputees. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the RNLI. The Turkish version of the RNLI was applied to 120 amputees. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively. Criterion validity was assessed using Short Form 36 (SF-36). The Turkish version of the RNLI presented reliable results in repeated assessments (ICC = .88), and the internal consistency of the RNLI was high (Cronbach's α coefficient = .89). A statistically significant relationship was found between RNLI and SF-36 (p < .05). The Turkish RNLI is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the level of reintegration to normal living for amputees.

Balance-confidence is associated with community participation, perceived physical mobility, and performance-based function among individuals with a unilateral amputation.

OBJECTIVE: To explore relationships between balance-confidence and: 1) community participation; 2) self-perceived mobility; and 3) performance-based physical function among individuals with a lower-limb amputation using a prosthetic. Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Setting: Outpatient, multidisciplinary amputee clinic. Participants: Patients (n = 45) using a prosthesis, aged ≥ 18 years, with a unilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputation of ≥1 year, were included. Methods: Participants completed the following self-report measures: Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC); Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ); Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI); and two performance-based measures (i.e. Timed Up and Go and 6 Minute Walk Test). Linear regression modeling was used to explore relationships between balance-confidence (i.e. ABC) and self-report (i.e. CIQ and LCI) and performance-based measures (p ≤ 0.0125). Results: After controlling for potential covariates (i.e. age, sex, and body mass index), balance-confidence explained 47.4% of the variance in CIQ (p = 0.000), 53.0% of the variance in LCI (p = 0.000), 20.3% of the variance in Timed Up and Go (p = 0.001), and 18.2% of the variance in 6 Minute Walk Test (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Lower balance-confidence is associated with less community participation, lower self-perceived mobility, and poorer performance among patients with a unilateral lower-limb amputation.

Impacto funcional y psicosocial del uso de prótesis de bajo costo en impresión 3D en amputado unilateral de antebrazo: estudio de un caso / Functional and psychosocial impact of the use of low cost 3D prosthesis in a subject with unilateral forearm amputation: case report

Introducción: Los pacientes que presentan una amputación a nivel transradial cuentan con oferta reducida de dispositivos protésicos (gancho y mano cosmética). Postulamos que disponer de nuevos sistemas protésicos 3D de bajo costo y la experiencia de su uso, permitirá aumentar las opciones para mejorar funcionalidad, actividad y participación. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto funcional y psicosocial del uso de mano protésica manufacturada con impresión 3D. Método: Se seleccionó un paciente Teletón con amputación transradial de antebrazo izquierdo nivel tercio medio, 15 años de edad, con consentimiento informado. Se tomó molde en yeso y confeccionó prótesis 3D fabricada en acrilonitrilo butadieno estireno (ABS) y ácido poli-láctico (PLA); el pulgar tiene dos articulaciones y los demás dedos tres articulaciones. La prótesis la constituyen también el antebrazo y muñeca. El usuario recibió cuatro sesiones de entrenamiento con la prótesis en el lapso de un mes. Las evaluaciones con pauta de funcionalidad de mano Bilan 400 points modificada, índice funcional de las extremidades superiores (UEFI) y escala del impacto psicosocial de la asistencia tecnológica (PIADS), se aplicaron previo al ingreso, a tres y once meses de seguimiento. Resultados: La funcionalidad de mano mostró un incremento de alrededor de 30% con ambos instrumentos. En medición PIADS, competencia, autoestima y adaptabilidad, variaron de ningún efecto de la asistencia tecnológica, hasta el máximo de 3 puntos para adaptabilidad en el seguimiento a 11 meses. Conclusión: Este estudio de caso destaca potenciales beneficios del uso de prótesis de extremidad superior en el desempeño funcional y calidad de vida.

Introduction: The range of prosthetic devices (hooks and cosmetic hands) is limited for transradial amputation patients. Having new low-cost 3D prosthetic systems available, as well as experience on how to use them, will increase the options for better functionality, activity and participation. Objective: To assess functional and psychosocial impact of the use of 3D printed prosthetic hand. Method: A 15 year-old Teleton patient was selected with a middle third transradial amputation of the left forearm; informed consent was obtained. A plaster mold was taken and a 3D prosthesis was made using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polylactic acid (PLA); the thumb had two articulations and the other fingers had three articulations. The prosthesis comprised also forearm and wrist. The user attended four prosthetic training sessions in a month. Modified Bilan 400 points scale for hand functionality, upper extremity functional index (UEFI) and the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS) were applied before admittance, and then at three and eleven months of follow up. Results: Hand functionality showed an increase of approximately 30% with both measuring instruments. In case of PIADS, competence, self-esteem and adaptability varied, from no effect of technology assistance, to the maximum of 3 points in adaptability at the eleven-month follow up. Conclusion: This case study highlights potential benefits of using upper limb 3D prosthesis on daily functional performance and quality of life.

Health concerns of veterans with high-level lower extremity amputations.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to identify health concerns of veterans with high-level lower extremity amputations. METHODS: Through a cross-sectional study, general practitioners, an orthopedic specialist, psychologists, psychiatrists, physiotherapist and prosthetists examined 100 veterans using a short-form health-related quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) that assessed their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and life satisfaction (SWLS) after hip disarticulation or hemi-pelvectomy amputations. The assessment tool was designed to gather statistically useful information about their health needs. RESULTS: The means of the Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS), SWLS, ADL and IADL were 48.58 ± 29.6, 33.33 ± 22.0, 19.30 ± 7.7, 48.10 ± 10.5 and 5.08 ± 1.8, respectively. Somatization, depression, and anxiety were the most prevalent disorders; among the veterans who were visited by psychiatrists, 11.6% had a history of hospitalization in a psychiatry section, and 53.2% had a psychiatric visit. Regardless of their injury in battle, 34% of veterans were hospitalized. Hearing problems were common, and about four-fifths of the participants suffered from at least one orthopedic condition. Neuroma (49%) was the most common stump-related complication during orthopedic evaluations, though the prevalence of phantom pain was 81% during the pain assessment. A total of 87% of the participants had a history of wearing a prosthesis, but only 29% wore a prosthesis at the time of the present study. The Canadian-type of prosthesis was uncomfortable and not useful (27%) and excessively heavy (10%) according to the amputees. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding veterans' characteristics and special needs are important to make sure that enough facilities and services are afforded to them. These findings emphasize the importance of paying close attention to different dimensions of health in veterans and can help health providers identify health needs and make regular assessments.

Patient Experience of Recovery After Major Leg Amputation for Arterial Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To date, studies of vascular amputees primarily examine quantitative outcomes following limb loss. Less is known about the patient's perspective after major lower limb amputation. Here, we define and describe the postamputation recovery period. METHODS: Qualitative study using purposive, maximum variation sampling on the variables of amputation level and times since surgery. We first conducted structured interviews with 20 participants (median age: 65 years, range: 45-88 years; 85% male; below knee amputation n = 14; above knee amputation n = 6; median time from amputation to interview = 16 months, range: 4-51 months). Findings were validated via a focus group with 5 amputees. Data were coded, analyzed, and interpreted by 2 reviewers. RESULTS: All participants expressed the desire to have an active role in the decision to undergo amputation, even while acknowledging that limb salvage options were exhausted. Following amputation, participants described a 6-month recovery period when they learned to modify daily activities to accommodate their new functional and psychological needs. Participants defined recovery as when they had regained functional independence, which was described as a level of mobility that allowed them to perform daily activities with minimal assistance. Concerns that participants felt were poorly addressed included uncontrolled pain, feeling unprepared to live with an amputation, and questions about prosthetics. Two of the 5 focus group participants stated a preference for amputation earlier in the treatment course. CONCLUSIONS: Postamputation recovery has an early (up to 6 months) and late phase (after 6 months) and concludes when amputees regain what they perceive as independence. Patients desire to participate in amputation decision-making; in this study, some would have preferred amputation earlier in their clinical course. Attention to the domains that impact quality of life, and fostering a shared decision-making process, are opportunities to enhance postamputation recovery.

Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to identify factors associated with completion of the VA home study of the DEKA Arm. Design and methodological procedures used: Differences between groups were examined using chi-square and t-tests. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting completion was generated and odds ratios (OR) for significant variables calculated. Post-hoc analysis was performed to plot the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Participants who completed were more likely to be prosthesis users at study onset (p = .03), and less likely to have a history of musculoskeletal problems (p = .047). There were no statistically significant differences between groups who completed and those who did not in gender, race, veteran status, age, body mass index (BMI), weight, height, musculoskeletal pain at baseline, satisfaction with current prosthesis, type of prosthesis, or months of prosthesis use. Two variables, prosthesis use and history of musculoskeletal problems were significant at p < .10. The area under the curve (AUC) accuracy index was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: We considered completion of the home use study a reasonable proxy for participant willingness to adopt the device; and believe that findings can be extrapolated to guide DEKA Arm prescription recommendations. Participants most likely to complete the study were already using a personal prosthesis, and without pre-existing musculoskeletal problems. Implications for rehabilitation Data from the VA Study of the DEKA Arm were analysed to determine which factors were associated with likely successful adoption of the DEKA Arm. Participants most likely to complete the study were those who already using a personal prosthesis, and those without pre-existing chronic or re-occurring musculoskeletal problems. This information may be useful when attempting to identify and target the most appropriate candidates for DEKA Arm prescription.

Iodine-Starch test for assessment of hyperhidrosis in amputees, evaluation of different methods of application.

PURPOSE: Hyperhidrosis is a common problem for amputees. The iodine-starch test is frequently used to assess hyperhidrosis, but a method for its application has not been described for amputees. METHODS: We performed an unblinded comparison of the iodine-starch test using various methods to protect the prosthesis in 10 prosthetic limb users with hyperhidrosis. RESULTS: Plastic wrap produced a diffuse pattern of sweating in 70% of subjects. Forty percent had complaints about this method, and 50% experienced leakage of iodine stain onto prosthetic liners. The prosthetic sheath produced a focal or multifocal reaction in 100% of subjects after 10 min of ambulation. Eighty percent had minor leakage onto the liner, and complaints were noted in 10%. The proportion that experienced diffuse sweating was significantly higher in the plastic wrap condition (p = 0.016; difference in proportions = 70%; 95% confidence interval = 32-100%). The prosthetic sock was tested in four subjects and all had at least mild complaints; three had minor leakage onto the liner. Repeated complaints and lack of stain prevention led to discontinuation with this method. CONCLUSIONS: Of the three methods, the sheath produces a focal or multifocal reaction after 10 min of ambulation and tends to cause less subject complaints. It should be the preferred method to apply the iodine-starch test to amputees. Implications for rehabilitation Hyperhidrosis is a common problem in amputees which negatively affects quality of life. The iodine-starch test is commonly used to guide treatment decisions for hyperhidrosis, but a preferred method for applying it in amputees has not been described. This study describes different methods for applying the iodine-starch test. A prosthetic sheath covering should be the preferred method for the iodine-starch test in amputees.

Enclosure utilisation and activity budgets of disabled Malayan sun bears (Helarctos malayanus).

Captive bears are housed in environments that differ greatly from their natural habitat, restricting their ability to perform normal species-specific behaviours. This may be detrimental to welfare, with disabled individuals at particular risk. The effect of physical disability on behaviour and enclosure utilisation was assessed in 12 adult Malayan sun bears (Helarctos malayanus) using 10min interval scan sampling. Amputees spent less time performing locomotor behaviours than able-bodied bears, used their enclosures less evenly, but did not exhibit obvious stereotypies. This was possibly due to the increased energy demands of locomotion, or residual pain in amputated limbs. Amputees spent less time grooming, but did not differ in time spent climbing compared with non-amputees. Partially sighted bears did not differ from able-bodied controls in enclosure use or behaviour. Age was positively correlated with stereotypical behaviour, and negatively correlated with maintenance and resting. Medication use was associated with more resting and grooming, and reduced stereotypy. The findings suggest that enclosures for amputees can be smaller than those for able-bodied bears, but should still contain a variety of climbing structures. Partially sighted bears fare well in enclosures designed for able-bodied bears, not requiring any special provision.

Analysis of selected factors determining quality of life in patients after lower limb amputation- a review article.

The amputation of the lower limb is a crippling procedure, which impairs both physical and mental aspect of the patient's life and therefore, it is important to provide these patients with comprehensive health care. Patients and their families must change their lives and reorganize them, which is undoubtedly associated with a decrease in the quality of life. The aim of this study was to analyze various determinants of quality of life in patients after lower limb amputation and their impact on the physical, mental and social aspect of life. Based on the available literature, this paper discusses certain factors determining quality of life, including the presence of phantom pain and stump pain, the way patients move, independence in daily activity, occupational activity, and access to rehabilitation. Analysis of the impact of particular factors on quality of life in people after lower limb amputation may contribute to the improvement and introduction of new paradigms regarding care provided for amputees.

Patient Experiences of Life Years After Severe Civilian Lower Extremity Trauma With Vascular Injury.

OBJECTIVE: Severe lower limb trauma with arterial injury is often devastating for the individual. Many studies describe how to manage these injuries when they occur. Short-term functional outcome is quite well described, but the patients are often young, and their suffering is physical, mental, and social from a lifelong perspective. The aim of this study was to report patient experiences of their lives several years after their accidents, and to explore mechanisms of how to improve management. METHOD: The Swedvasc registry was searched for participants from 1987 to 2011, living in the region of Uppsala, Sweden. Some amputated participants were added from the Walking Rehabilitation Center. There were five reconstructed patients with an intact limb, and three with amputations. In depth interviews were conducted and systematically analyzed, using A Giorgi's descriptive phenomenological method. RESULTS: Eight patients participated, five with reconstructed and three with amputated limbs. Life affecting functional impairments were described by all patients. The patients undergoing amputation had received more structured follow up and support through the Walking Rehabilitation Center. The satisfaction with the cosmetic result was poorer than expected. All patients had developed strategies of how to cope with their impairments and stated they now lived "normal lives." CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial physical, psychological, and cosmetic impairments years after severe lower limb trauma, the participants described life as "normal" and mainly satisfactory. Transition to the new situation could have been facilitated by more frequent and continuous follow up after discharge from hospital, in particular among the non-amputated patients who tend to be lost to follow up. Findings also indicate that family members have to be acknowledged, strengthened, and supported.

Trauma-related amputations in war and at a civilian major trauma centre-comparison of care, outcome and the challenges ahead.

The Afghanistan conflict has resulted in a large number of service personnel sustaining amputations. Whilst obvious differences exist between military and civilian trauma-related amputations both settings result in life changing injuries. Comparisons offer the potential of advancement and protection of the knowledge gained during the last 12 years. This paper compares the military and civilian trauma-related amputee cohorts' demographics, management and rehabilitation outcomes measures. The UK military Joint Theatre Trauma Registry and a civilian major trauma centre database of trauma-related amputees were analysed. 255 military and 24 civilian amputees were identified. A significant difference (p>0.05) was seen in median age (24, range 18-43, vs. 48, range 24-87 years), mean number of amputations per casualty (1.6±SD 0.678 vs. 1±SD 0.0), mean ISS (22±SD 12.8 vs. 14.7±SD 15.7) and gender (99% males vs. 78%). Rehabilitation outcome measures recorded included the Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine score where the military group demonstrated significantly better scores (91% Grade E+ compared to 19%). Differences in patients underlying physiology and psychology, the military trauma system and a huge sustained investment in rehabilitation are all contributing factors for these differing outcomes. However the authors also believe that the use of a consultant-led MDT and central rehabilitation have benefited the military cohort in the acute rehabilitation stage and is reflected in the good short-term outcomes.

Delivery of cosmetic covers to persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputations in an outpatient prosthetic practice.

BACKGROUND: Limb loss negatively impacts body image to the extent that functional activity and societal participation are affected. Scientific literature is lacking on the subject of cosmetic covering for prostheses and the rate of cosmetic cover utilization by cover type, gender, amputation level, and type of healthcare reimbursement. OBJECTIVES: To describe the delivery of cosmetic covers in lower limb prostheses in a sample of people with lower extremity amputation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional design METHODS: Patient records from an outpatient practice were reviewed for people who received a transtibial or transfemoral prosthesis within a selected 2-year period. RESULTS: A total of 294 records were reviewed. Regardless of the amputation level, females were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more likely to receive a cover. Type of insurance did not affect whether or not a cover was used, but Medicare reimbursed more pull-up skin covers. CONCLUSION: There were differences regarding cosmetic cover delivery based on gender, and Medicare reimbursed for more pull-up skin covers at the transtibial level than other reimbursors did. This analysis was conducted in a warm, tropical geographic region of the United States. Results may differ in other parts of the world based on many factors including climate and local views of body image and disability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cosmetic covering rates are clinically relevant because they provide insight into which gender is utilizing more cosmetic covers. Furthermore, it can be determined which type of covers are being utilized with greater frequency and which insurance type is providing more coverage for them.

ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION.

INTRODUCTION: Lower extremity amputation is a surgical procedure resulting in important anatomical, functional, psychological, and social consequences that can influence the quality of life of these patients. The aim of this research was to compare the quality of life of patients with lower extremity amputation and people without amputation taking into account gender differences as well as the amputation level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a cross-sectional study which included 56 subjects. The patients from the experimental group underwent prosthetic rehabilitation treatment at the Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina. The experimental group included 28 patients (21 male, 7 female) with lower extremity amputation, their average age being 65.36±13.64. The control group consisted of 28 age and gender matching subjects without amputation. Research ANd Development (RAND) 36--Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) was used to measure the quality of life. RESULTS: The results showed that patients with lower extremity amputation scored lower than the control group on all SF-36 variables (p<0.05). None of the SF-36 variables differed between the genders (p>0.05). Seventeen (61%) patients were with transfemoral, and 11 (39%) with transtibial level of amputation. The patients with transtibial amputations scored higher on physical functioning and general health status variables (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The patients with lower extremity amputations have numerous limitations compared to the control group, regardless of gender, while the patients with lower level of amputation have a higher level of physical functioning.

A systematic review of functional and quality of life assessment after major lower extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: When judging the success or failure of major lower extremity (MLE) amputation, the assessment of appropriate functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes is paramount. The heterogeneity of the scales and tests in the current literature is confusing and makes it difficult to compare results. We provide a primer for outcome assessment after amputation and assess the need for the additional development of novel instruments. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for all studies using functional and QOL instruments after MLE amputation. Assessment instruments were divided into functional and QOL categories. Within each category, they were subdivided into global and amputation-specific instruments. An overall assessment of instrument quality was obtained. RESULTS: The initial search revealed 746 potential studies. After a review of abstracts, 102 were selected for full review, and 40 studies were then included in this review. From the studies, 21 different assessment instruments were used 63 times. There were 14 (67%) functional measures and 7 (33%) QOL measures identified. Five (36%) of the functional instruments and 3 (43%) of the QOL measures were specific for MLE amputees. Sixteen instruments were used >1 time, but only 5 instruments were used >3 times. An additional 5 instruments were included that were deemed important by expert opinion. The 26 assessment instruments were rated. Fourteen of the best-rated instruments were then described. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of instruments used to measure both functional and QOL outcomes make it difficult to compare MLE amputation outcome studies. Future researchers should seek to use high-quality instruments. Clinical and research societies should endorse the best validated instruments for future use in order to strengthen overall research in the field.

"Look and feel your best": representations of artificial limb users in prosthetic company advertisements.

PURPOSE: Artificial limbs (prosthetics) are considered important for keeping the person physically active and avoiding an array of negative health outcomes associated with non-use. Increasingly, the potential users of these limbs are the focus of commercial prosthetic company advertisements. It has been argued that it is important to examine such media representations, not least because people's beliefs regarding health and illness are often forged from the discourses and constructions available to them in such material, but because these representations mediate individual lived experience. METHOD: This article provides a thematic analysis, drawing upon discourse analysis and semiotics, of textual-pictorial representations of artificial limb users in the advertisements of prosthetic companies. The data set was comprised of advertisements that appeared over a 2-year period in inMotion, an international magazine produced and distributed by a major amputee advocacy group. RESULTS: The findings indicate that dominant societal constructions of work, gender and family are drawn on in depicting artificial limb users. These offer generally positive representations that draw on socially pervasive stereotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings are discussed in relation to literature concerning the experience and meaning of prosthesis use, and the implications for health professionals working with this group are set out. Implications for Rehabilitation People who lose a limb are increasingly being exposed to advertisements from prosthetic companies. Such advertisements have the potential to foster unrealistic expectations regarding rehabilitation following amputation. Healthcare professionals need to be mindful of how these advertisements mediate lived experience and impact on rehabilitation when planning personal care plans.

Mental health and social participation skills of wheelchair basketball players: a controlled study.

The aim of this study was to assess differences in psychological well-being, symptomatic psychological disorders and social participation, between competitive wheelchair basketball participants and those non-participants. Forty-six wheelchair participants, 24 Basketball players (aged 35.60 ± 7.56) and 22 non-players (aged 36.20 ± 6.23), completed three validated self-report questionnaires: Participation Scale (PS), Psychological Well-Being Scale [PWBS] and Symptom Checklist 90 R [SCL-90-R]. ANOVA showed significant overall differences between the two groups. The social restriction score, evaluated by PS, was significantly higher in the non-basketball participants (p=0.00001) than the basketball participants. The PWB Scale showed significant differences in all 6 dimensions: positive relations with others, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life and self-acceptance (p<0.01), and autonomy (p<0.05), with better scores in the basketball participants. The SCL-90-R scores were significantly lower for the basketball group in the following 6 symptomatic dimensions: depression, phobic anxiety, and sleep disorder (p<0.01), somatization, interpersonal sensitivity and psychoticism (with p<0.05). It was concluded that competitive wheelchair basketball participants showed better psychological well-being and social skills than those non-participants.