RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is higher than in high-income countries (HICs), and poor anesthesia care is a contributing factor. Many anesthesia complications are considered preventable with adequate training. The Safer Anaesthesia From Education Obstetric Anaesthesia (SAFE-OB) course was designed as a refresher course to upgrade the skills of anesthesia providers in low-income countries, but little is known about the long-term impact of the course on changes in practice. We report changes in practice at 4 and 12-18 months after SAFE-OB courses in Madagascar and the Republic of Congo. METHODS: We used a concurrent embedded mixed-methods design based on the Kirkpatrick model for evaluating educational training courses. The primary outcome was qualitative determination of personal and organizational change at 4 months and 12-18 months. Secondary outcomes were quantitative evaluations of knowledge and skill retention over time. From 2014 to 2016, 213 participants participated in 5 SAFE-OB courses in 2 countries. Semistructured interviews were conducted at 4 and 12-18 months using purposive sampling and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Participants underwent baseline knowledge and skill assessment, with 1 cohort reevaluated using repeat knowledge and skills tests at 4 months and another at 12-18 months. RESULTS: At 4 months, 2 themes of practice change (Kirkpatrick level 3) emerged that were not present at 12-18 months: neonatal resuscitation and airway management. At 12-18 months, 4 themes emerged: management of obstetric hemorrhage, management of eclampsia, using a structured approach to assessing a pregnant woman, and management of spinal anesthesia. With respect to organizational culture change (Kirkpatrick level 4), the same 3 themes emerged at both 4 and 12-18 months: improved teamwork, communication, and preparation. Resistance from peers, lack of senior support, and lack of resources were cited as barriers to change at 4 months, but at 12-18 months, very few interviewees mentioned lack of resources. Identified catalysts for change were self-motivation, credibility, peer support, and senior support. Knowledge and skills tests both showed an immediate improvement after the course that was sustained. This supports the qualitative responses suggesting personal and organizational change. CONCLUSIONS: Participation at a SAFE-OB course in the Republic of Congo and in Madagascar was associated with personal and organizational changes in practice and sustained improvements in knowledge and skill at 12-18 months.
Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Anestesia Obstétrica/economia , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Congo/epidemiologia , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Madagáscar/epidemiologia , Pobreza/economia , Gravidez , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in caesarean sections and facilities performing caesareans over time in Tanzania and examine the readiness of such facilities in terms of infrastructure, equipment and staffing. DESIGN: Nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional surveys of women and health facilities. SETTING: Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: Women of reproductive age and health facility staff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Population-based caesarean rate, absolute annual number of caesareans, percentage of facilities reporting to perform caesareans and three readiness indicators for safe caesarean care: availability of consistent electricity, 24 hour schedule for caesarean and anaesthesia providers, and availability of all general anaesthesia equipment. RESULTS: The caesarean rate in Tanzania increased threefold from 2% in 1996 to 6% in 2015-16, while the total number of births increased by 60%. As a result, the absolute number of caesareans increased almost fivefold to 120 000 caesareans per year. The main mechanism sustaining the increase in caesareans was the doubling of median caesarean volume among public hospitals, from 17 caesareans per month in 2006 to 35 in 2014-15. The number of facilities performing caesareans increased only modestly over the same period. Less than half (43%) of caesareans in Tanzania in 2014-15 were performed in facilities meeting the three readiness indicators. Consistent electricity was widely available, and 24 hour schedules for caesarean and (less systematically) anaesthesia providers were observed in most facilities; however, the availability of all general anaesthesia equipment was the least commonly reported indicator, present in only 44% of all facilities (34% of public hospitals). CONCLUSIONS: Given the rising trend in numbers of caesareans, urgent improvements in the availability of general anaesthesia equipment and trained anaesthesia staff should be made to ensure the safety of caesareans. Initial efforts should focus on improving anaesthesia provision in public and faith-based organisation hospitals, which together perform more than 90% of all caesareans in Tanzania.
Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cesárea , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Adulto , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Anestesia Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea/métodos , Cesárea/normas , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Materna/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Materna/normas , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Gravidez , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Tanzânia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The United Nations 2015 Millennium Development Goals targeted a 75% reduction in maternal mortality. However, in spite of this goal, the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births remains unacceptably high across Sub-Saharan Africa. Because many of these deaths could likely be averted with access to safe surgery, including cesarean delivery, we set out to assess the capacity to provide safe anesthetic care for mothers in the main referral hospitals in East Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at 5 main referral hospitals in East Africa: Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, and Burundi. Using a questionnaire based on the World Federation of the Societies of Anesthesiologists (WFSA) international guidelines for safe anesthesia, we interviewed anesthetists in these hospitals, key informants from the Ministry of Health and National Anesthesia Society of each country (Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/AA/B561). RESULTS: Using the WFSA checklist as a guide, none of respondents had all the necessary requirements available to provide safe obstetric anesthesia, and only 7% reported adequate anesthesia staffing. Availability of monitors was limited, and those that were available were often nonfunctional. The paucity of local protocols, and lack of intensive care unit services, also contributed significantly to poor maternal outcomes. For a population of 142.9 million in the East African community, there were only 237 anesthesiologists, with a workforce density of 0.08 in Uganda, 0.39 in Kenya, 0.05 in Tanzania, 0.13 in Rwanda, and 0.02 anesthesiologists in Burundi per 100,000 population in each country. CONCLUSIONS: We identified significant shortages of both the personnel and equipment needed to provide safe anesthetic care for obstetric surgical cases across East Africa. There is a need to increase the number of physician anesthetists, to improve the training of nonphysician anesthesia providers, and to develop management protocols for obstetric patients requiring anesthesia. This will strengthen health systems and improve surgical outcomes in developing countries. More funding is required for training physician anesthetists if developing countries are to reach the targeted specialist workforce density of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery of 20 surgical, anesthetic, and obstetric physicians per 100,000 population by 2030.
Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Adulto , África Oriental , Anestesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/mortalidade , Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Anestesiologistas/economia , Anestesiologistas/educação , Anestésicos/economia , Anestésicos/provisão & distribuição , Lista de Checagem , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Mortalidade Materna , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades/economia , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Gravidez , Respiração Artificial/economia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Ventiladores Mecânicos/economia , Ventiladores Mecânicos/provisão & distribuiçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Marked variation across hospitals in adverse maternal outcomes in cesarean deliveries is reported, including anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs). Identification of hospital-level characteristics accounting for this variation may help guide interventions to improve anesthesia care quality. In this study, we examined the association between hospital-level characteristics and ARAEs in cesarean deliveries and assessed individual hospital performance. METHODS: Discharge records for cesarean deliveries, ARAEs, and patient characteristics in the State Inpatient Database for New York State 2009 to 2011 were identified with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The hospital reporting index was calculated as the sum of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes divided by the number of discharges. Data on hospital characteristics were obtained from the American Hospital Association and the Area Health Resources files. Multilevel modeling was used to examine the association of hospital-level characteristics with ARAEs and to assess individual hospital performance. RESULTS: The study included 236,960 discharges indicating cesarean deliveries in 141 hospitals; 1557 discharges recorded at least 1 ARAE (6.6 per 1000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-6.9). The following factors were associated with a significantly increased risk of ARAEs: Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.2), multiple gestation (aOR, 1.3), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.5), general anesthesia (aOR, 1.3), hospital annual cesarean delivery volume <200 (aOR, 2.3), and reporting index (aOR, 1.1 per 1 increase per discharge). Fifteen percent of the between-hospital variation in ARAEs was explained by the hospital annual cesarean delivery volume and 6% by the reporting index. Eight hospitals (6%) were classified as good-performing, 104 (74%) as average-performing, and 29 (21%) as bad-performing hospitals. Compared with good-performing hospitals, a 2.3-fold (95% CI, 1.7-3.0) and 5.9-fold (95% CI, 4.5-7.8) increase in the rate of ARAEs was observed in average- and bad-performing hospitals, respectively. Bringing up bad-performing hospitals to the level of average-performing hospitals would prevent 466 ARAEs (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Low cesarean delivery volume is the strongest hospital-level predictor of ARAEs in cesarean deliveries and the main determinant of between-hospital variation. Future study to identify other factors and interventions to improve performance in bad-performing hospitals is warranted.
Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Anestesia Obstétrica/tendências , Cesárea/normas , Cesárea/tendências , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , New York , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Gravidez , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this arm of the ANESCAT 2003 study was to describe the temporal distribution and types of anesthesia used in Catalonia, Spain, in 2003, along with the associated human resources used. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Data were used from a survey of 23,136 anesthetic procedures collected on 14 randomly selected days in 2003 and an individual questionnaire was completed by 765 anesthesiologists working in Catalonia. RESULTS: Anesthesia practice was divided into that associated with surgery (78.4%), obstetrics (11.3%), and other nonsurgical procedures (10.4%). Of all anesthetic procedures performed, 84.3% took place in operating theaters and 7.0% in obstetric areas. Emergency procedures accounted for 20.3% of the total. Most procedures (71.2%) were undertaken within 08:00 and 16:00 h, and the lowest number of procedures performed on workdays took place on Fridays. The median duration of anesthesia was 60 minutes. The most common technique was regional anesthesia (41.4%), with spinal block being the most widely used. There were an estimated 12.5 anesthesiologists per 100,000 inhabitants, with a median (10th-90th percentile) age of 45 (34-57) years; women made up 47.2% of that group. The mean number of standard working hours was 46 hours per week and 65% of anesthesiologists also undertook on duty shifts. Anesthesiologists spent 77% of their time performing anesthesia and the remainder in postoperative recovery and critical care units and pain clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency anesthesia represents 20% of the total workload and obstetrics and nonsurgical procedures another 20%. The use of regional anesthesia was very widespread. The population density of anesthesiologists is comparable to that of other European countries, but with a higher proportion of women.
Assuntos
Anestesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Anestesiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Mão de Obra em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Anestesia Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Agendamento de Consultas , Sedação Consciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Amostragem , Espanha , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Maternal mortality remains one of the most daunting public health problems in resource-poor settings, and reductions in maternal mortality have been identified as a prominent component of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals. The World Health Organization estimates that 515000 women die each year from pregnancy-related causes, and almost all of these deaths occur in developing countries. Evidence has shown that access to and utilization of high-quality emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is central to efforts aimed at reducing maternal mortality. We analyzed health care policies that restrict access to life-saving EmOC in most resource-poor settings, focusing on examples from rural India, a country of more than 1 billion people that contributes approximately 20% to 24% of the world's maternal deaths.
Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Mortalidade Materna , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Obstetrícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Áreas de Pobreza , Anestesia Obstétrica/normas , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/normas , Serviços de Saúde Materna/provisão & distribuição , Obstetrícia/normas , GravidezRESUMO
For nearly 50 years there has been an independent system for monitoring all maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Validation exercises suggest that about 99% of cases are successfully identified and reviewed. The analysis is published every 3 years and includes independent assessment as to whether substandard care was present. As the proportion of cases where substandard care is present remains constant at about 40-50%, it is claimed that these reports do little to improve the quality of care. Review of particular causes of deaths suggests that the regular stating of the problem areas, developing management guidelines relating to these, and re-auditing practice, almost certainly has improved standards. However, more remains to be done.