The impact of completion and follow-up endoleaks on survival, reintervention, and rupture.

OBJECTIVE: Endoleaks may be seen at case completion of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and the presence of an endoleak may impact outcomes. However, the clinical implications of various endoleaks seen during follow-up is not well-described. Therefore, we studied the impact of endoleaks at completion and at follow-up on mid-term outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent EVAR from 2003 to 2016 within the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare database and identified patients with endoleak at procedure completion and during follow-up, excluding those presenting with rupture. We stratified cohorts by presence of completion and follow-up endoleak subtypes. The primary outcome was 5-year survival, and secondary outcomes included 5-year freedom from reintervention and freedom from rupture. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests to analyze differences in time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS: Of 21,745 patients with completion endoleak data, 5085 (23%) had an endoleak. Compared with those without endoleak, those with type I endoleaks had lower 5-year survival (69% vs 75%; P < .001), type II endoleaks had higher survival (79%; P < .001), and types III, IV, and indeterminate were not statistically different (73%, 73%, and 75%, respectively). Freedom from reintervention for types I and III endoleaks were significantly lower than no endoleak cohort (I: 76%; P < .001; III: 72%; P < .001 vs 83%), but freedom from rupture was higher for those with type II and III endoleak (95% and 97% vs 94%; P < .001). Of 14,479 patients with detailed follow-up endoleak data, 2290 (16%) had an endoleak. Compared with those without endoleak, types I and III had significantly lower 5-year survival (I: 80%; P = .002; III: 66%; P < .001 vs 84%), but there were no differences for types II (82%) and indeterminate (77%). Those with any type of follow-up endoleak had lower 5-year freedom from reintervention (I: 70%; P < .001; II: 76%; P = .006; III: 36%; P < .001; indeterminate: 60%; P = .007 vs 84%), and lower freedom from rupture (I: 92%; P < .001; II: 91%; P = .16; III: 88%; P = .01; indeterminate: 90%; P = .11 vs 94%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients with no endoleak, those with type I completion endoleaks have lower 5-year survival and freedom from reintervention. Patients with types I and III follow-up endoleaks also have lower survival, and any endoleak at follow-up is associated with lower freedom from reintervention and freedom from rupture. These data highlight the importance of careful patient selection and close postoperative follow-up after EVAR, as the presence of endoleaks, specifically type I and III, over time portends worse outcomes.

A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak (T2EL)-related re-intervention. The data of 455 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures between January 2018 and December 2021 at our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Following the implementation of exclusion criteria, 283 patients were finally included and divided into T2EL-related re-intervention (n = 42) and non-T2EL (n = 241) groups. The overall T2EL-related re-intervention rate for 283 patients was 14.8% (42/283). Using multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for re-intervention included age (OR, 1.172; 95% CI, 1.051-1.307; P = 0.004), smoking (OR, 13.418; 95% CI, 2.362-76.215; P = 0.003), diameter of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (OR, 21.380; 95% CI, 3.060-149.390; P = 0.002), and number of patent lumbar arteries (OR, 9.736; 95% CI, 3.175-29.857; P < 0.001). The discrimination ability of this risk-predictive model was reasonable (concordance index [C-index] = 0.921; 95% CI, 0.878-0.964). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was performed on the model, and the chi-square value was 3.210 (P = 0.920), presenting an excellent agreement between the model-predicted and observed values. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified that the risk thresholds of re-intervention were a diameter of > 2.77 mm for the diameter of the inferior mesenteric artery and a proportion of < 45.5% for thrombus volume in the aneurysm sac. This novel nomogram risk assessment model for predicting the possibility of patients' T2EL-related re-interventions after EVAR should be helpful in discriminating high-risk patients. Two novel risk thresholds may imply a higher possibility of T2EL-related re-intervention after EVAR.

Racial disparities in treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery has recommended immediate transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) to a regional center when feasible. However, Black patients might be less likely to be transferred and more likely to be turned down for repair. We, therefore, examined the transfer rates, turndown rates, and outcomes for Black vs White patients presenting with rAAAs in two large databases. METHODS: We examined all rAAA repairs in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2020 to evaluate the transfer rates and outcomes for Black vs White patients. We used the National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2015 to examine the turndown rates. Mixed effects logistic regression, Cox regression, and marginal effects modeling were used to study the interaction between race, insurance status, surgery type (open repair vs endovascular aortic aneurysm repair), and hospital volume. RESULTS: We identified 4935 patients with rAAAs in the Vascular Quality Initiative (6.2% Black) and 48,489 in the National Inpatient Sample (6.0% Black). The rates of transfer were high; however, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo transfer before repair compared with White patients (49% Black vs 62% White; P = .002). The result was consistent in both crude and adjusted analyses when considering only stable patients and was not modified by insurance status, surgery type, or hospital volume. No significant differences were found in perioperative mortality (22% vs 26%; P = .098) or complications (52% vs 52%; P = .64). However, Black patients were significantly more likely to be turned down for repair (37% vs 28%; odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.9; P < .001). A significant interaction was found between race and insurance status with respect to turndown. Patients with private insurance had undergone surgery at a similar rate, regardless of race. However, among patients with Medicare or Medicaid/self-pay, Black patients were less likely than were White patients to undergo repair (Medicare, 64% vs 72%; P = .001; Medicaid/self-pay, 43% vs 61%; P = .031). Patients with Medicaid/self-pay were also less likely to undergo repair than were patients of the same race with either Medicare or private insurance (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that Black patients with rAAAs are poorly served by the current systems of interhospital transfer in the United States, because they less often undergo transfer before repair. Although the postoperative outcomes appeared similar, this finding could be falsely optimistic, because Black patients, especially the underinsured, were turned down for repair more often even after adjustment. Significant work is needed to better understand the reasons underlying these disparities and identify the targets to improve the care of Black patients with rAAAs.

[Perioperative lethality after endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: An analysis of administrative data of the AOK health insurance fund]. / Zur perioperativen Letalität des rupturierten Bauchaortenaneurysmas nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung: eine Analyse von Routinedaten der AOK Gesundheit.

OBJECTIVE: In this paper we will report the perioperative outcome after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) in Germany based on data of the AOK health insurance fund. METHODS: Anonymised data of all patients with rAAA (n = 3,227) who were treated from 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2016 were analysed, using SPSS 27 (IBM Deutschland GmbH, Ehningen, Germany). RESULTS: 41.9% (1,353/3,227) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 58.1% (1,874/3,227) with OAR. Patients ≥80 years made up 38.4% for EVAR and 32.9% for OAR (p = 0.002). The proportion of patients undergoing surgery within 24 hours after admission was significantly higher for OAR (87.8%) than for EVAR (73.0%) (p = 0.000). The perioperative lethality rate for OAR was 42.4%, and thus almost twice as high as for EVAR with 21.3% (p = 0.000). Women had higher perioperative lethality rates for both EVAR (perioperative lethality 24.6%) and OAR (perioperative lethality 51.7%) compared to men with 20.6% (EVAR) and 40.2% (OAR), respectively. With EVAR, 35.8% of the patients showed a complication-free postoperative course, with OAR it was 17.7% (p = 0.000). Blood transfusions (whole blood, red cell concentrates, and autotransfusions) were administered in 57.6% of the patients with EVAR, but in 92.3% with OAR (p = 0.000). The highest perioperative lethality was found in EVAR and OAR patients who received both surgery within 24 hours after admission and blood transfusions (perioperative lethality EVAR 36.0%, OAR 46.0%; p = 0.000). In contrast, patients who did not require blood transfusions and were treated later than 24 hours after admission had the lowest perioperative lethality with 3.2% for EVAR vs. 5.4% for OAR (p = 0.623). CONCLUSION: The data confirm the observation that the perioperative mortality of rAAA patients is lower with EVAR than with OAR. However, strict attention must be paid to the time of the intervention. The low perioperative lethality of patients who were treated later than 24 hours after hospital admission and who did not require blood transfusions indicates that cases of symptomatic AAA without rupture have also been recorded in this administrative database under the diagnosis rAAA. One point of criticism is that the decision not to adjust for the patient groups with EVAR and with OAR in order to be able to better analyse the properties of routine data includes a considerable risk of bias in the statements of this work due to confounding variables.

Mini-Surgical Access Prevents Local Complications and Reduces Costs in Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to propose a minimally invasive surgical approach to the common femoral artery in endovascular aortic repair and assess its value by a single-center retrospective study including 118 patients. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2022, all patients receiving endovascular treatment for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in our center had the anterior wall of the common femoral artery exposed, through a 2-3 cm transverse groin incision, instead of a complete surgical cutdown. We access the artery with a purse-string suture, held tight with a tourniquet. After procedure completion, we tie the purse-string closing the arteriotomy. We retrospectively analyzed the cohort of all consecutive patients treated with endovascular aortic repair in this period and recorded primary and assisted technical success, operative time, in-hospital length of stay, access failure, and access-related complications, comparing the results with the current literature. RESULTS: All procedures were successful, with no perioperative mortality. Primary technical success was achieved in 116 patients; 2 required adjunctive procedures. No access failure or access-related complications (thrombosis, groin hematoma, lymphocele, wound dehiscence, or infection) occurred. Two accesses required conversion to complete femoral artery exposure and endarterectomy. Operatory time and length of in-hospital stay were comparable to the outcomes of the major studies reporting on percutaneous access, saving the costs of the closure devices. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgical access is safe and feasible for endovascular aortic procedures. Compared to the costs of percutaneous access found in literature, it is cost-effective. It can be chosen whenever the percutaneous approach is not feasible or at a high risk of complications.

Radiographically quantified sarcopenia and traditional cardiovascular risk assessment in predicting long-term mortality after endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated radiographically quantified sarcopenia and the patient's comorbidity burden based on traditional cardiovascular risk assessment as potential predictors of long-term mortality after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: The study included 480 patients treated with standard EVAR for intact infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, aneurysm dimensions, and other preoperative risk factors were collected retrospectively. Preoperative computed tomography was used to measure psoas muscle area (PMA) at the L3 level. Patients were divided into three groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and PMA. In the high-risk group, patients had sarcopenia (PMA <8.0 cm2 for males and <5.5 cm2 for females) and an ASA score of 4. In the medium-risk group, patients had either sarcopenia or an ASA score of 4. Patients in the low-risk group had no sarcopenia and the ASA score was less than 4. Risk factors for long-term mortality were determined using multivariable analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients in the high- and medium-risk groups were older than those in the low-risk group (77 ± 7, 76 ± 6, and 74 ± 8 years, respectively, P < .01). Patients in the high-risk group had higher prevalence of coronary artery disease, pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. There were no differences in 30-day or 90-day mortality between the groups. The independent predictors of long-term mortality were age, ASA score, PMA, chronic kidney disease, and maximum aneurysm sac diameter. The estimated 1-year mortality rates were 5% ± 2% for the low-risk, 5% ± 2% for the medium-risk, and 18% ± 5% for the high-risk group (P < .01). Five-year mortality estimates were 23% ± 4%, 36% ± 3%, and 60% ± 6%, respectively (P < .01). The mean follow-up time was 5.0 ± 2.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Both ASA and PMA were strong predictors of increased mortality after elective EVAR. The combination of these two can be used as a simple risk stratification tool to identify patients in whom aneurysm repair or the intensive long-term surveillance after EVAR may be unwarranted.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography versus ultrasound-based surveillance following endovascular aortic repair of intact infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: While Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend computed tomography angiography (CTA) or ultrasound for surveillance following infrarenal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), there is a lack of consensus regarding optimal timing and modalities. We hypothesized that ultrasound-based approaches would be more cost-effective and developed a cost-effectiveness analysis to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes of various strategies. METHODS: We developed a decision tree with nested Markov models to compare five surveillance strategies: yearly CTA, yearly CDU, yearly CEU, CTA at first year followed by CDU, and CTA at first year followed by CEU. The model accounted for differential sensitivity, specificity, and risk of acute kidney injury after CTA, and was implemented on a monthly cycle with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and 3% annual discounting. RESULTS: Under base case assumptions, the CTA-CDU strategy was cost effective with a lifetime cost of $77950 for 7.74 QALYs. In sensitivity analysis, the CTA-CDU approach remained cost-effective when CEU specificity was less than 95%, and risk of acute kidney injury following CTA was less than 20%. At diagnostic sensitivities below 75% for CEU and 55% for CDU, a yearly CTA strategy maximized QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid strategy in which CTA is performed in the first year and CDU is performed annually thereafter is the most cost-effective strategy for infrarenal EVAR surveillance in patients with less than a 20% risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. If the sensitivity of CEU and CDU are at the lower end of plausible estimates, a yearly CTA strategy is reasonable. Further research should aim to identify patients who may benefit from alternative surveillance strategies.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Guidelines Negligibly Impacted Repair Rates in Male Never-Smokers and Female Smokers.

OBJECTIVE: In 2014, in addition to male smokers aged 65-75 years, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening for male never-smokers aged 65-75 years with cardiovascular risk factors (Grade C). The USPSTF evolved from a negative to neutral position on screening for female smokers aged 65-75 years (Grade I). We sought to determine whether 2014 guidelines resulted in more AAA repairs in these populations. METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative national database (2013-2018) for elective endovascular aortic repairs and open aortic repairs. We implemented difference-in-differences (DID) analysis, a causal inference technique that adjusts for secular time trends, to isolate changes in repair numbers due to the 2014 USPSTF guidelines. Our DID models compared changes in repair numbers in patient groups targeted by the USPSTF updates (intervention group) to those in unaffected, older patient groups (control), before and after 2014. The first model compared changes in repair numbers between male never-smokers aged 65-75 years (intervention group) and 76-85 years (control). The second model compared repair numbers between female smokers aged 65-75 years (intervention group) and 76-85 years (control). RESULTS: There was no significant change in male never-smokers (n = 1,295) aged 65-75 (42%) vs. 76-85 (58%) undergoing AAA repairs after guideline updates, averaged over 4.5 years (+2.4 percentage points; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -.56-5.26). However, when their primary insurer was Medicare, male never-smokers aged 65-75 years compared with 76-85 years underwent significantly more repairs over 4.5 years (+3.69 percentage points; 95% CI.16-7.22; representing a 10.4% relative increase from baseline in the proportion of male never-smokers on Medicare undergoing AAA repair). Comparing female smokers (n = 2,312) aged 65-75 (54%) vs. 76-85 (46%), there was no significant change in repairs over 4.5 years (-.66 percentage points; 95% CI -4.57-3.26). CONCLUSIONS: The USPSTF 2014 AAA guidelines were associated with modestly increased repairs in male never-smokers aged 65-75 years only on Medicare. There was no impact among female smokers. Higher-grade recommendations and improved guideline adherence may be requisites for change.

Renal Transplant Patients Undergo Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair at a Younger Age and Experience More Complications: Review of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Database.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether history of kidney transplant is a risk factor for increased complications in patients who undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. BACKGROUND: The incidence of renal failure and subsequent kidney transplant is steadily rising. Many risk factors leading to AAA overlap with those of renal disease. Due to these similarities, a rising incidence of kidney transplant patients undergoing AAA repair is expected. We surmised a notable difference in AAA surgical repair outcomes in renal transplant recipients compared to the general population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 59,836 adult patients with history of AAA repair and kidney transplant from 2008 to 2015. Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database developed for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. RESULTS: Significant differences in age, race, hospital characteristics, and complications were identified. The results suggest that patients with prior transplant generally have AAA repair at a significantly younger age (P < .001). A difference in race (P = .017), with 75% vs 87.4% non-Hispanic whites and 5% vs 1.5% Asian/Pacific Islander in the transplant and nontransplant groups, respectively, was shown. Procedures at transplant centers had significantly longer lengths of stay (P < .001) and higher total charges (P < .001). In addition, transplant recipients exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality index (P < .001) than the nontransplanted population. CONCLUSION: A history of kidney transplant significantly influences multiple aspects of care and complications regarding future AAA repair and is associated with increased in-hospital mortality index. Significant findings include increased total charges, longer lengths of stay, postoperative complications, and differences in age and race.

Plasma D-dimer as a predictor of intraluminal thrombus burden and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

AIM: Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) is presented in most abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and is suggested to promote AAA expansion. D-dimer, a breakdown product in the thrombus remodeling, may have prognostic value for AAA. This study investigated the interrelation between plasma D-dimer level, ILT volume, AAA size and progression. MAIN METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study that involved 181 patients with infra-renal AAA. They were divided into small and large AAA groups according to AAA diameter. 24 of them had repeated abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan and were divided into slow-growing and fast-growing AAA groups according to the median value of AAA growth rate. Baseline and follow-up plasma D-dimer level, maximum diameter of AAA, total infra-renal aortic volume and ILT volume were analyzed. KEY FINDINGS: Plasma D-dimer level was positively correlated with ILT volume (R = 0.382, P < 0.001) and maximum diameter of AAA (R = 0.442, P < 0.001). Increasing value of plasma D-dimer was positively associated with the accelerated growth rate of AAA (R = 0.720, P < 0.01). ILT volume showed positive correlation with maximum diameter (R = 0.859, P < 0.001) and growth rate of AAA (R = 0.490, P < 0.05). After adjusting the baseline ILT volume, the positive correlations remained to be statistically significant between plasma D-dimer level and AAA size (R = 0.200, P < 0.05), as well as increasing value of plasma D-dimer and growth rate of AAA (R = 0.642, P < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Plasma D-dimer level reflected ILT burden in AAAs. Plasma D-dimer level and ILT volume were positively correlated with AAA size. Increasing value of plasma D-dimer and baseline ILT volume could be predictors of AAA progression.

Assessment of the regional distribution of normalized circumferential strain in the thoracic and abdominal aorta using DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of the aortic wall offers the potential to improve patient-specific diagnostics and prognostics of diverse aortopathies by quantifying regionally heterogeneous aortic wall strain in vivo. However, before regional mapping of strain can be used to clinically assess aortic pathology, an evaluation of the natural variation of normal regional aortic kinematics is required. METHOD: Aortic spiral cine DENSE CMR was performed at 3 T in 30 healthy adult subjects (range 18 to 65 years) at one or more axial locations that are at high risk for aortic aneurysm or dissection: the infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA, n = 11), mid-descending thoracic aorta (DTA, n = 17), and/or distal aortic arch (DAA, n = 11). After implementing custom noise-reduction techniques, regional circumferential Green strain of the aortic wall was calculated across 16 sectors around the aortic circumference at each location and normalized by the mean circumferential strain for comparison between individuals. RESULTS: The distribution of normalized circumferential strain (NCS) was heterogeneous for all locations evaluated. Despite large differences in mean strain between subjects, comparisons of NCS revealed consistent patterns of strain distribution for similar groupings of patients by axial location, age, and/or mean displacement angle. NCS at local systole was greatest in the lateral/posterolateral walls in the IAAs (1.47 ± 0.27), medial wall in anteriorly displacing DTAs (1.28 ± 0.20), lateral wall in posteriorly displacing DTAs (1.29 ± 0.29), superior curvature in DAAs < 50 years-old (1.93 ± 0.22), and medial wall in DAAs > 50 years (2.29 ± 0.58). The distribution of strain was strongly influenced by the location of the vertebra and other surrounding structures unique to each location. CONCLUSIONS: Regional in vivo circumferential strain in the adult aorta is unique to each axial location and heterogeneous around its circumference, but can be grouped into consistent patterns defined by basic patient-specific metrics following normalization. The heterogeneous strain distributions unique to each group may be due to local peri-aortic constraints (particularly at the aorto-vertebral interface), heterogeneous material properties, and/or heterogeneous flow patterns. These results must be carefully considered in future studies seeking to clinically interpret or computationally model patient-specific aortic kinematics.

Risk Factor Assessment in a Greek Cohort of Patients With Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Environmental and genetic risk factors contribute to the etiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been associated with the pathophysiology of AAAs. A prospective, nonrandomized case-control study was undertaken to investigate the risk factors for large AAAs (≥5.5 cm) among 175 male Greek AAA patients and to compare the results with a cohort of 166 male controls free from any aortic dilatation, as confirmed by ultrasonography from an existing AAA screening program in the same region. We also assessed the potential association between 2 functional single nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes MMP9 (-1561C/T; rs3918242) and MMP13 (-77A/G; rs2252070), and the presence of large AAAs. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed AAA family history ( P = .028), hypercholesterolemia ( P < .001), and current smoking ( P < .001) as AAA risk factors. Statistical difference was reached in genotype ( P = .047) and allele ( P = .037) frequencies for rs2252070, but the results did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing. No significant differences in genotype or allele frequencies for rs3918242 were detected. In summary, AAA family history, hypercholesterolemia, and current smoking were found to be risk factors for large AAAs.

Understanding abdominal aortic aneurysm epidemiology: socioeconomic position affects outcome.

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic position (SEP) has been demonstrated to negatively influence outcome in several cardiovascular patient groups. The aim of this study was to analyse time trends of incidence of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) and ruptured AAA (rAAA), respectively, and to investigate whether SEP had any influence on the probability to present with rupture and, finally, to determine the impact of SEP on outcome. METHODS: Nationwide population-based study including all individuals with iAAA or rAAA in Sweden during 2001-2015. RESULTS: The number of individuals with an AAA was 41 222; the majority were identified as iAAA 33 254 (80.7%) and 7968 (19.3%) as rAAA. Time trends showed decreasing incidence of rAAA but increase in iAAA during the study period. Individuals with low income or low educational level were more likely to present with a rAAA rather than iAAA: OR 2.16 (95 % CI 1.98 to 2.36, p<0.001) and OR 1.33 (95 % CI 1.21 to 1.46, p<0.001), respectively. Low income was also associated with increased 90-day mortality and 1-year mortality after treatment for rAAA, OR 1.42 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.89, p=0.014) and OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.97, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: This large nationwide study showed a decreasing incidence of rAAA. Individuals with low SEP were found to have an augmented risk of presenting with rAAA rather than iAAA and, in addition, to fare worse after repair. Consequently, SEP should be regarded as a relevant risk factor that should be included in considerations for improved care flow of patients with AAA.

Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysms in Germany using health insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has emerged as standard of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Real-world evidence is limited to compare this technology to open repair (OAR). Major gaps exist related to short-term and long-term outcomes, particularly in respect of gender differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Health insurance claims data from Germany's third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, was used to investigate invasive in-hospital treatment of intact (iAAA) and ruptured AAA (rAAA). Patients operated between October 2008 and April 2015 were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 5,509 patients (4,966 iAAA and 543 rAAA) underwent EVAR or OAR with a median follow-up of 2.44 years. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics of DAK-G patients were assessed. In total, 84.6 % of the iAAA and 79.9 % of the rAAA were male. Concerning iAAA repair, the median age (74 vs. 73 years, p < .001) compared to men was higher in females, but their EVAR-rate (66.8 % vs. 71.1 %, p = .018) was lower. Besides higher age of female patients (80 vs. 75 years, p < .001), no further statistically significant differences were seen following rAAA repair. In-hospital mortality was slightly lower in males compared to females following iAAA (2.3 % vs. 3.1 %, p = .159) and rAAA (37.3 % vs. 43.1 %, p = .273) repair. Concerning iAAA repair, a higher rate of female patients was transferred to another hospital (3.7 % vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.008) or discharged to rehabilitation (6.0 % vs. 2.7 %, p < .001) compared to male patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this large German claims data cohort, women are generally older and more often transferred to another hospital or discharged to rehab following iAAA repair. Nonetheless, no significantly increased risk of in-hospital or late death appeared for women in multivariate analyses. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of recent gender-specific treatment strategies on overall outcome under real-world settings.

The costs of elective and emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparative single centre study.

AIM: Population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is being considered in New Zealand. However, there is a lack of data to support its cost effectiveness in this country. The aim of this study was to compare the hospital costs of AAA repair in emergency and elective cases over a 3-year period in a single centre in New Zealand. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of consecutive patients undergoing elective and emergency AAA repair during the study period (January 2009 to December 2011) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 169 AAA repairs were performed during the study period, of which 114 (67%) were open repairs. Sixty-four of these were open elective AAA repairs, 40 were open ruptured repairs, and 10 were open symptomatic repairs. The mean inpatient cost was $38,804 for open ruptured AAA repair and $28,019 for open elective repair, a difference of $10,785 (95%CI: $249 to $21,321; p=.045). The costs of blood products and laboratory investigations were significantly greater in the ruptured group than the elective. There was no significant difference in length of hospital admission between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ruptured AAA repairs are more expensive than elective AAA repairs, despite no difference in length of hospital stay. The estimated inpatient costs documented in this study for each type of repair can be used for cost-effectiveness analysis in New Zealand. A screening program that reduces the incidence of surgery for ruptured AAA could decrease the average inpatient cost of AAA repairs.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm refers to abdominal aortic dilation of 3.0 cm or greater. The main risk factors are age older than 65 years, male sex, and smoking history. Other risk factors include a family history of abdominal aortic aneurysm, coronary artery disease, hypertension, peripheral artery disease, and previous myocardial infarction. Diagnosis may be made by physical examination, an incidental finding on imaging, or ultrasonography. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released updated recommendations for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in 2014. Men 65 to 75 years of age with a history of smoking should undergo one-time screening with ultrasonography based on evidence that screening will improve abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality in this population. Men in this age group without a history of smoking may benefit if they have other risk factors (e.g., family history of abdominal aortic aneurysm, other vascular aneurysms, coronary artery disease). There is inconclusive evidence to recommend screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women 65 to 75 years of age with a smoking history. Women without a smoking history should not undergo screening because the harms likely outweigh the benefits. Persons who have a stable abdominal aortic aneurysm should undergo regular surveillance or operative intervention depending on aneurysm size. Surgical intervention by open or endovascular repair is the primary option and is typically reserved for aneurysms 5.5 cm in diameter or greater. There are limited options for medical treatment beyond risk factor modification. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is a medical emergency presenting with hypotension, shooting abdominal or back pain, and a pulsatile abdominal mass. It is associated with high prehospitalization mortality. Emergent surgical intervention is indicated for a rupture but has a high operative mortality rate.

Cost-effectiveness of intensive smoking cessation therapy among patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is one of the few available strategies to decrease the risk for expansion and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The cost-effectiveness of an intensive smoking cessation therapy in patients with small AAAs identified at screening was evaluated. METHODS: A Markov cohort simulation model was used to compare an 8-week smoking cessation intervention with adjuvant pharmacotherapy and annual revisits vs nonintervention among 65-year-old male smokers with a small AAA identified at screening. The smoking cessation rate was tested in one-way sensitivity analyses in the intervention group (range, 22%-57%) and in the nonintervention group (range, 3%-30%). Literature data on the effect of smoking on AAA expansion and rupture was factored into the model. RESULTS: The intervention was cost-effective in all tested scenarios and sensitivity analyses. The smoking cessation intervention was cost-effective due to a decreased need for AAA repair and decreased rupture rate even when disregarding the positive effects of smoking cessation on long-term survival. The incremental cost/effectiveness ratio reached the willingness-to-pay threshold value of €25,000 per life-year gained when assuming an intervention cost of > €3250 or an effect of ≤ 1% difference in long-term smoking cessation between the intervention and nonintervention groups. Smoking cessation resulted in a relative risk reduction for elective AAA repair by 9% and for rupture by 38% over 10 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: An adequate smoking cessation intervention in patients with small AAAs identified at screening can cost-effectively increase long-term survival and decrease the need for AAA repair.

Is population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for 1-2% of all male deaths over the age of 65 years. Early detection of AAA and elective surgery can reduce the mortality risk associated with AAA. However, many patients will not be diagnosed with AAA and have therefore an increased death risk due to the untreated AAA. It has been suggested that population screening for AAA in elderly males is effective and cost-effective. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening elderly men for AAA. METHODS: We performed a systematic search for economic evaluations in NHSEED, EconLit, Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Cinahl and two Scandinavian HTA data bases (DACEHTA and SBU). All identified studies were read in full and each study was systematically assessed according to international guidelines for critical assessment of economic evaluations in health care. RESULTS: The search identified 16 cost-effectiveness studies. Most studies considered only short term cost consequences. The studies seemed to employ a number of "optimistic" assumptions in favour of AAA screening, and included only few sensitivity analyses that assessed less optimistic assumptions. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of cost-effectiveness of AAA screening are recommended.

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in medicare beneficiaries.

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been shown to be beneficial and cost-effective for men aged 65-74. However, most screening studies have been conducted in Europe and Australia, where attendance for screening was higher than the single large U.S. study involving only veterans. The prevalence of AAA in the U.S. general population is not well defined, nor is the best method of recruitment for screening. Letters of invitation for a free screening ultrasound for AAA were sent to 30,000 randomly selected Medicare beneficiaries from the hospital referral region of three university-affiliated hospitals without restriction by age, gender, or comorbidity. Attendance for screening was calculated by age, gender, and travel distance to the screening center. Telephone calls to a random sample of nonresponders were made to determine the reason for failure to attend. Prevalence of AAA by ultrasound and known risk factors for AAA (e.g., age, gender, smoking status) were determined. The attendance rate was 7% (2,005). Attendance was greater with male gender (p < 0.01), younger age (p < 0.05), and decreased travel distance to the screening center (p < 0.05). The primary reasons for failure to attend included incorrect address or vital status, poor health, and lack of interest. Prevalence of previously undetected AAA was 2.8% in men and 0.2% in women. AAA was predicted by smoking status and male gender (p < 0.01 for each). Unselected invitation of Medicare beneficiaries for ultrasound screening for AAA results in a low attendance and low yield of AAA. The prevalence estimates from this study may not reflect the entire Medicare population given the low attendance and may reflect the healthy habits of those most interested in screening. Patients should be selected for screening based on their suitability for repair if an AAA is found as well as their risk factors for AAA. The best method of recruitment for screening of those most at risk for AAA in the United States remains to be determined.