Interdisciplinary assessment and diagnostic algorithm: The role of the cardiologist.

Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of developing heart failure and those with heart failure are at higher risk of developing diabetes. In patients with diabetes antidiabetic medications and the metabolic alterations of diabetes increase the risk of developing heart failure. In diabetic patients with heart failure and in those with an increased likelihood of developing the disease a stepwise approach based on the use of natriuretic peptides and echocardiography to rule out the presence of heart failure should be used. Once the diagnosis of heart failure is established it will be important to define the phenotype according to the left ventricular function and, where appropriate, use additional tests to identify possible additional underlying causes of heart failure like coronary artery disease. A multidisciplinary heart failure management programs is recommended in all patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure to enable appropriate investigations, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate agreed evidence-based therapy and care plan. The implementation of a multidisciplinary heart failure management program requires a multidisciplinary team that will have to follow the patients throughout the whole heart failure trajectory and that should consider a holistic approach to the diabetic patient with heart failure rather than focussing merely on either heart failure or diabetes.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin treatment in people with Type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.

AIM: In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, empagliflozin therapy reduced cardiovascular death by 38% compared with placebo when added to standard of care. Using the trial results, we created a discrete-event simulation model to assess lifetime health economic outcomes in people with Type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Time-dependent survival regression analysis was performed on data from EMPA-REG OUTCOME for 10 cardiovascular and renal events (e.g. stroke, heart failure hospitalization, macroalbuminuria, cardiovascular mortality) to capture event rates over time, and interaction between events. Model performance was assessed by comparing predicted and observed outcomes at 3 years. Costs in the United Kingdom (UK) and health utilities were obtained from published literature. Outcomes included cumulative event rates, life-years, costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The model predicted an 18% relative increase (by 2.1 life-years) in survival for empagliflozin (14.0 life-years) vs. standard of care (11.9 life-years), attributable to direct treatment effect on cardiovascular mortality, and to indirect effect via reductions in other events. Participants treated with empagliflozin may experience improved quality of life (1.0 QALY) and higher costs (£3737/participant), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £4083/QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results to changes in input parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Based on extrapolation of EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial data using a participant-level simulation model, empagliflozin in addition to standard of care is projected to be highly cost-effective using UK healthcare costs. The impact in other countries will vary due to differences in drug pricing and accrual of other costs. (Clinical Trial Registry No: NCT01131676).

Pharmaceutical cost and multimorbidity with type 2 diabetes mellitus using electronic health record data.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study is to estimate the frequency of multimorbidity in type 2 diabetes patients classified by health statuses in a European region and to determine the impact on pharmaceutical expenditure. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the inhabitants of a southeastern European region with a population of 5,150,054, using data extracted from Electronic Health Records for 2012. 491,854 diabetic individuals were identified and selected through clinical codes, Clinical Risk Groups and diabetes treatment and/or blood glucose reagent strips. Patients with type 1 diabetes and gestational diabetes were excluded. All measurements were obtained at individual level. The prevalence of common chronic diseases and co-occurrence of diseases was established using factorial analysis. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of diabetes was 9.6 %, with nearly 70 % of diabetic patients suffering from more than two comorbidities. The most frequent of these was hypertension, which for the groups of patients in Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) 6 and 7 was 84.3 % and 97.1 % respectively. Regarding age, elderly patients have more probability of suffering complications than younger people. Moreover, women suffer complications more frequently than men, except for retinopathy, which is more common in males. The highest use of insulins, oral antidiabetics (OAD) and combinations was found in diabetic patients who also suffered cardiovascular disease and neoplasms. The average cost for insulin was 153€ and that of OADs 306€. Regarding total pharmaceutical cost, the greatest consumers were patients with comorbidities of respiratory illness and neoplasms, with respective average costs of 2,034.2€ and 1,886.9€. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is characterized by the co-occurrence of other diseases, which has implications for disease management and leads to a considerable increase in consumption of medicines for this pathology and, as such, pharmaceutical expenditure.

Resource use and costs in high-risk symptomatic peripheral artery disease patients with diabetes and prior acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: As the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) increases there is growing concern about the associated healthcare burden. This burden has not been well-characterized in high-risk patients with concurrent diabetes and/or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The objective of this analysis was to assess comorbidities, medication use, outcomes, services and costs for 3 high-risk symptomatic PAD groups. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal analysis used the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (2005-2013). The 3 high-risk symptomatic PAD groups were (1) symptomatic PAD with/without diabetes, (2) symptomatic PAD with/without prior ACS, and (3) symptomatic PAD with/without diabetes and prior ACS. The study time frame was a period of 1-year before the earliest date of a symptomatic PAD record and 3 years post. RESULTS: In all, 16,663 symptomatic PAD patients were identified across the three risk groups. Mean age ranged from 66.4-67.4 years; the majority (55.0%-63.3%) were men. At 3 years post index, patients with symptomatic PAD and a risk factor had significantly higher use of beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins (P<0.0007), and higher rates of all-cause and symptomatic PAD-related medical services, diagnoses and procedures (P<0.05). Clopidogrel and statins were used by ≤ 41.2% and ≤ 66.7% of symptomatic PAD patients without risk, respectively, and ≤ 68.9% and ≤ 80.2% of patients with risks. All cause and symptomatic PAD-related treatment costs (P<0.0001) were higher for symptomatic PAD patients with risks versus patients without risks where annualized all-cause cost differences ranged from $7,482 to $13,504 and annualized PAD-related cost differences ranged from $605 to $1,997. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic PAD patients with diabetes and/or prior ACS have significantly higher medical resource use and costs compared to symptomatic PAD patients without these risk factors. The utilization rate of secondary prevention therapies is suboptimal; therefore, greater effort must be made to increase utilization and optimize treatment to minimize the impact of symptomatic PAD.

The fixed combination efficacy assessment in patients with secondary neovascular glaucoma and diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: To assess IOP-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (Ganfort®) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and uncontrolled secondary neovascular glaucoma (NG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (51 eyes) with uncontrolled secondary neovascular glaucoma and diabetes mellitus were enrolled in the study. All patients with an uncontrolled IOP have been proposed to switch current IOP-lowering therapy to Ganfort®. In case target IOP level was not reached filtration surgery was recommended. Ganfort® administration - once a day in the morning. RESULTS: IOP-lowering has been observed in all patients when switched to Ganfort®. Mean IOP level was almost 3-x lower versus baseline in 72.5% of patients (37 eyes). The patients achieved target IOP of 15-17 mmHg. As a result, no surgical intervention was required. Significant IOP-lowering has been observed in another group of patients (14 eyes, 27.5 %) nevertheless due to glaucoma progression, these patients are still subjected to surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: IOP-lowering fixed combination Ganfort® (Allergan) can be used in patients with secondary neovascular glaucoma and diabetes mellitus as a drug of choice to control the IOP level. Even in cases when target IOP is not achieved, Ganfort® can be administered in pre-operative period and helps to reduce postoperative complications.

Clinical assessment of delayed gastric emptying and diabetic complications using gastric emptying scintigraphy: involvement of vascular disorder.

AIM: Delayed gastric emptying, including gastroparesis, is a common complication in diabetes mellitus. The association between delayed gastric emptying and overall diabetic complications remains to be studied in detail. We analysed this association. METHODS: We performed gastric emptying scintigraphy of (99m) Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in 34 patients with diabetes to measure the gastric emptying half-times (T1/2) of the whole stomach (WS), proximal stomach (PS) and distal stomach (DS). We assessed T1/2, diabetic-related factors and complications. RESULTS: The prevalence of autonomic neuropathy was higher in the group with delayed T1/2 of the WS than in the normal group. Analysis of intima-media thickness (IMT) and ankle brachial pressure index (ABI), which are risk indicators for vascular disorder, showed that IMT of the carotid bulb was greater in the group with delayed T1/2 of the WS than in the normal group (2·41 mm [1·50-2·81] versus 1·40 mm [0·81-2·08], P = 0·015). T1/2 of the WS correlated positively with IMT of the carotid bulb (r = 0·391, P = 0·027) and negatively with ABI (r = -0·389, P = 0·028). These correlations were mainly attributed to PS and were the same in patients without autonomic neuropathy. In seven of nine patients who received scintigraphy again after diabetic treatment, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels decreased and T1/2 of the WS shortened compared with before treatment. CONCLUSION: Vascular disorder, among other cofactors such as autonomic neuropathy, could be involved in the pathophysiology of delayed gastric emptying. Medium- to long-term glycaemic control was associated with gastric emptying.

Medication adherence in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia: associated factors and strategies for improvement.

Dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus are commonly coincident, and together contribute to the development of atherosclerotic disease. Medication therapy is the mainstay of treatment for dyslipidemia. Optimal medication therapy for dyslipidemia in patients with diabetes reduces cardiovascular events but necessitates patients take multiple medications. As a result, sub-optimal adherence to medication therapy is common. Factors contributing to medication non-adherence in patients taking multiple medications are complex and can be grouped into patient-, social and economic-, medication therapy-, and health provider and health system-related factors. Strategies aimed at improving medication adherence may target the patient, health care providers, or health systems. Recent data suggest medication non-adherence contributes to racial health disparities. In addition, health literacy, cost-related medication non-adherence, and patient beliefs regarding medication therapy have all been recently described as factors affecting medication adherence. Data from within the last year support an important role for regular contact between patients and health care providers to effectively address these factors. Cost-related barriers to medication adherence have recently been addressed through examination of health system approaches to decreasing cost-related non-adherence.

The "cost" of treating to target: cross-sectional analysis of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in Australian general practice.

BACKGROUND: To describe the current treatment gap in management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in general practice as well as the associated financial and therapeutic burden of pharmacological treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health trial. This totalled 473 patients from 59 general practices with participants eligible if they had HbA1c > 7.5%. Main outcome measures included proportions of patients not within target risk factor levels and weighted average mean annual cost for cardiometabolic medications and factors associated with costs. Medication costs were derived from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule. RESULTS: Average age was 63 (range 27-89). Average HbA1c was 8.1% and average duration of diabetes was 10 years. 35% of patients had at least one micro or macrovascular complication and patients were taking a mean of 4 cardio-metabolic medications. The majority of participants on treatment for cardiovascular risk factors were not achieving clinical targets, with 74% and 75% of patients out of target range for blood pressure and lipids respectively. A significant proportion of those not meeting clinical targets were not on treatment at all. The weighted mean annual cost for cardiometabolic medications was AUD$1384.20 per patient (2006-07). Independent factors associated with cost included age, duration of diabetes, history of acute myocardial infarction, proteinuria, increased waist circumference and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment rates for cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in our participants are higher than those identified in earlier studies. However, rates of achieving target levels remain low despite the large 'pill burden' and substantial associated fiscal costs to individuals and the community. The complexities of balancing the overall benefits of treatment intensification against potential disadvantages for patients and health care systems in primary care warrants further investigation.

Associations of HbA1c and educational level with risk of cardiovascular events in 32,871 drug-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes: a cohort study in primary care.

AIMS: To explore the association of HbA1c and educational level with risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A cohort of 32 871 patients with Type 2 diabetes aged 35 years and older identified by extracting data from electronic patient records for all patients who had a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes and had glucose-lowering agents prescribed between 1999 and 2009 at 84 primary care centres in Sweden. Associations of mean HbA1c levels and educational level with risks of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality were analysed. RESULTS: The associations of HbA1c with risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were J-shaped, with the lowest risk observed for cardiovascular mortality at an HbA1c level of 51 mmol/mol (6.8%) for subjects on oral agents and 56 mmol/mol (7.3%) in insulin-treated patients. The lowest risk observed for all-cause mortality was at an HbA1c level of 51 mmol/mol (6.8%) for subjects on oral agents and 56 mmol/mol (7.3%) in insulin-treated patients. There was an increased risk for cardiovascular death [hazard ratio 1.6 (1.2-2.1), P = 0.0008] at the lowest HbA1c decile for subjects in the low education category. For subjects with higher education there was no evident J curve for cardiovascular death [hazard ratio 1.2 (0.8-1.6), P = 0.3873]. CONCLUSIONS: Our results lend support to the recent American Diabetes Association/ European Association for the Study of Diabetes position statement that emphasizes the importance of additional factors, including the propensity for hypoglycaemia, which should influence HbA1c targets and treatment choices for individual patients. (Clinical Trials Registry No; NCT 01121315).

Prasugrel.

Prasugrel is a third-generation thienopyridine which selectively inhibits the platelet P2Y(12) receptor more rapidly, more potently, and with less interindividual response variability compared with the second-generation thienopyridine clopidogrel. Large-scale phase III clinical testing showed that in high-to moderate-risk acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel translates into a greater reduction in ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, in the short and long term compared to clopidogrel. Prasugrel, however, is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, which is more pronounced in certain patient subgroups. The ideal patient population for prasugrel use are those patients without prior transient ischemic attack/stroke, <75 years of age and >60 kg in whom the greatest ischemic benefit is achieved without a significant increase in major bleeding risk. Dose modifications in specific populations or at given time-points may represent an avenue to minimize bleeding risk and therefore maximize the clinical benefit of prasugrel. Ongoing clinical studies with prasugrel will better define the safety and efficacy profiles of this agent and potentially set the basis for new indications for use.

Adding pharmacists to primary care teams reduces predicted long-term risk of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients without established cardiovascular disease: results from a randomized trial.

AIM: To determine the impact of adding pharmacists to primary care teams on predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular events in patients with Type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease. METHODS: This was a pre-specified secondary analysis of randomized trial data. The main study found that, compared with usual care, addition of a pharmacist resulted in improvements in blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, and hyperglycaemia for primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes. In this sub-study, predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular events at baseline and 1 year were calculated for patients free of cardiovascular disease at enrolment. The primary outcome was change in UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk score; change in Framingham risk score was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the 102 intervention patients and 93 control subjects: 59% women, median (interquartile range) age 57 (50-64) years, diabetes duration 3 (1-6.5) years, systolic blood pressure 128 (120-140) mmHg, total cholesterol 4.34 (3.75-5.04) mmol/l and HbA(1c) 54 mmol/mol (48-64 mmol/mol) [7.1% (6.5-8.0%)]. Median baseline UKPDS risk score was 10.2% (6.0-16.7%) for intervention patients and 9.5% (5.8-15.1%) for control subjects (P = 0.80). One-year post-randomization, the median absolute reduction in UKPDS risk score was 1.0% greater for intervention patients compared with control subjects (P = 0.032). Similar changes were seen with the Framingham risk score (median reduction 1.2% greater for intervention patients compared with control subjects, P = 0.048). The two risk scores were highly correlated (rho = 0.83; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adding pharmacists to primary care teams for 1 year significantly reduced the predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular events for patients with Type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease.

Does diabetes care differ by type of chronic comorbidity?: An evaluation of the Piette and Kerr framework.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between diabetes care and types of comorbidity, classified by the degree to which their treatment is concordant with that for diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study (fiscal year [FY] 2001 to FY 2004) of 42,826 veterans with new-onset diabetes in FY 2003. Veterans were classified into five chronic comorbid illness groups (CCIGs): none, concordant only, discordant only, both concordant and discordant, and dominant. Five diabetes-related care measures were assessed in FY 2004 (guideline-consistent testing and treatment goals for HbA(1c) and LDL cholesterol and diabetes-related outpatient visits). Analyses included logistic regressions adjusting for age, race, sex, marital status, priority code, and interaction between CCIGs and visit frequency. RESULTS: Only 20% of patients had no comorbidities. Mean number of visits per year ranged from 7.8 (no CCIG) to 17.5 (dominant CCIG). In unadjusted analyses, presence of any illness was associated with equivalent or better care. In the fully adjusted model, we found interaction between CCIG and visit frequency. When visits were <7 per year, the odds of meeting the goal of HbA(1c) <8% were similar in the concordant (odds ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.83-1.11]) and lower in the discordant (0.90 [0.81-0.99]) groups compared with the no comorbidity group. Among patients with >24 visits per year, these odds were insignificant. Dominant CCIG was associated with substantially reduced care for glycemic control for all visit categories and for lipid management at all but the highest visit category. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that diabetes care varies by types of comorbidity. Concordant illnesses result in similar or better care, regardless of visit frequency. Discordant illnesses are associated with diminished care: an effect that decreases as visit frequency increases.

Socio-economic status influences blood pressure control despite equal access to care.

OBJECTIVE: Denmark has a health care system with free and equal access to care irrespective of age and socio-economic status (SES). We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate a possible association between SES and blood pressure (BP) control of hypertensive patients treated in general practice. METHODS: We enrolled 184 general practices and 5260 hypertensive patients. The general practitioners reported information about BP and diagnosis of diabetes. Information about education, income, antihypertensive drug treatment and other co-morbidity was retrieved from relevant registers from Statistics Denmark. The outcome measure was BP control defined as BP <140/90 mmHg in general and <130/80 mmHg in diabetics. RESULTS: Patients <65 years and with an educational level of 10-12 years had increased odds ratio (OR) of BP control compared to patients with an educational level <10 years. Patients ≥65 years had increased OR of BP control if they were married/cohabiting as compared to being single, whereas education and income had no impact in this age group. Diabetics had significantly reduced odds of BP control irrespective of age, educational or income level. CONCLUSIONS: Despite equal access to care for all patients, SES had significant impact on BP control in this survey. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease also had a substantial influence irrespective of age, educational and income level.

Intensive multifactorial intervention improves modelled coronary heart disease risk in screen-detected Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare the effects of intensive multifactorial cardiovascular risk intervention with standard care in screen-detected Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty general practices randomly invited 30 950 adults without diagnosed diabetes for screening (World Health Organization, 1999). In a cluster randomized controlled trial, screen-detected cases were assigned by practice allocation to receive intensive protocol-driven cardiovascular risk management (n = 146) or standard care (n = 199) according to local guidelines. Intensive intervention was designed to achieve an HbA(1c) of 48 mmol/mol (6.5%), blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg and total cholesterol < 3.5 mmol/l. Primary outcome was modelled 5-year coronary heart disease risk (UKPDS-CHD). Analysis was via intention to treat. RESULTS: After 1.1 years 339 (98%) individuals were still participating. There were significant reductions in HbA(1c) , blood pressure and total cholesterol from baseline in both groups [mean change for total study population -27.7 mmol/mol (-0.62%), -11.64/10.01 mmHg, -1.11 mmol/l]. After adjustment for baseline and clustering, significant inter-group differences were observed in mean changes from baseline for HbA(1c) {-28.5 mmol/mol [-0.7% (1.4)] vs. -27.5 mmol/mol [-0.6% (1.6)], P = 0.001}, blood pressure [systolic -16.2 (19.6) vs. -8.4 (18.6) mmHg, P < 0.001], total cholesterol [-1.3 (1.3) vs. -1.0 (1.2) mmol/l, P < 0.001] and weight [-3.8 (5.5) vs. -2.2 (5.5) kg, P = 0.01] in favour of intensive treatment. UKPDS 5-year coronary heart disease risk was reduced by 3.2% and 2.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Intensive intervention was associated with more lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive but not hypoglycaemic medication use [odds ratios 2.5 (1.4-4.4), 5.5 (2.4-11.5), 1.6 (0.8-2.3); compared with standard care, P < 0.001, P = 0.003, P = 0.65]. Treatment satisfaction responses were superior with intensive intervention, with no increase in self-reported hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSION: Intensive intervention in patients with diabetes identified through systematic non-risk-factor-based screening significantly reduces modelled coronary heart disease risk. This is achieved predominantly with lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive treatments with no adverse effect on quality of life or hypoglycaemia.

Clinical analysis of elderly patients with elderly-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: assessment of appropriate therapy.

Patients with elderly-onset diabetes have specific characteristics. This study was designed to investigate these characteristics and to evaluate methods for appropriate control of glycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors in elderly-onset diabetes patients. A total of 155 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were divided into those diagnosed at >or= 65 years of age (elderly-onset group, 75 patients) and those diagnosed at < 60 years of age (usual-onset group, 80 patients). Differences in clinical variables, diabetic complications, diagnosed comorbidities and the use of medications were analysed. Mean glycosylated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose and fasting insulin levels were significantly lower in the elderly-onset group than in the usual-onset group. The usual-onset group showed significantly greater homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance than the elderly-onset group. Microvascular complications and insulin use were significantly more common in the usual-onset group. In conclusion, insulin resistance was less severe in elderly-onset diabetes than in usual-onset diabetes. As hyperglycaemia was relatively mild or moderate, oral hypoglycaemic agents might be effective for elderly-onset diabetes.

Secondary prevention of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease in cardiac rehabilitation: risk factors, treatment and target level attainment.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic patients who have suffered from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are at very high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Their prognosis, however, can be improved if the target values for blood pressure (BP < 130/80 mmHg) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dl), optionally < 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dl)] are achieved. It is not known what proportion of diabetic patients receives such stringent secondary prevention measures and achieves target level attainment for BP, lipids and glucose in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). METHODS: During 2003 to 2005, 11 973 diabetic (29.7%) and 28 370 non-diabetic patients (70.3%), predominantly after ACS (74 and 80%), were included in a nationwide registry. At entry and at discharge, patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy and blood pressure, lipids and blood glucose were recorded. In a mixed model approach, temporal changes between centres and within centres, respectively, were analysed. RESULTS: At discharge, a lower proportion of diabetic patients achieved normalisation of BP (in 2005: <140/90 mmHg: 78.4 vs. 82.9% in non-diabetic patients, p < 0.001) or <130/80 mmHg (45.5 vs. 49.8%), respectively. LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was more frequently attained in diabetic patients (68.2 vs. 66.5%), as was LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L (28.8 vs. 23.0%). Fasting blood glucose was not changed during the observation period, as at discharge almost a quarter of all diabetic patients exceeded the threshold value of 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dl). In 2005 at discharge, statin therapy was administered in 93% in both diabetics and non-diabetics, acetylic salicylic acid in 79% in diabetics vs. 80% in non-diabetic patients (clopidogrel: 41 vs. 45%). CONCLUSION: Generally there is room for improvement in the management of cardiac risk factors for both patients groups. In diabetic patients in CR at high risk for recurrent cardiac events, in recent years an improvement of the lipid profile has been observed. Hypertension and glycaemia are still not optimally addressed.

Preventing diabetic complications: a primary care perspective.

While controlling cardiometabolic risk factors remains central to diabetes management, substantial disease burden persists despite intensive targeting of blood glucose, blood pressure and lipids. Data from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study provide some new insights. As well as significant reduction in total cardiovascular disease events, especially among patients with marked atherogenic dyslipidaemia (low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and hypertriglyceridaemia), fenofibrate had preventive effects on microvascular outcomes, reducing laser treatment for retinopathy, progression of albuminuria, and non-traumatic amputations. These findings suggest re-evaluation of fenofibrate as an option for reducing the risk of diabetic vascular complications.

Gender-based treatment outcomes in diabetic hypertension.

BACKGROUND: In developing countries, gender-based treatment disparities in cardiovascular preventive therapy have received little attention. AIMS: To evaluate the gender-based differences in cardiovascular disease risk profile, drug prescribing pattern, and blood pressure (BP) and glycemic control rates in diabetic hypertensives treated at primary care setting in Bahrain. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective study at primary care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An audit of the medical records of 392 diabetic hypertensives (127 men, 265 women). RESULTS: BP and glycemic targets were achieved in < 10% and < 13% of diabetic hypertensives, respectively. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors monotherapy was more often prescribed in males. Apart from this, no significant differences in prescribing pattern were observed between male and female diabetic hypertensives treated with either antihypertensive mono or multidrug therapies. With the exception of insulin which was more often prescribed to females, a similar prescribing pattern and rank order of antidiabetics, either as monotherapy or combinations, was observed in both genders. The majority of diabetic hypertensives were at high cardiovascular risk. The body mass index and total cholesterol level were greater in females. Prescribing lipid-lowering drugs and aspirin were suboptimal; aspirin was more often prescribed to males. There was no gender-based difference with regard to the use of lipid-lowering drugs. CONCLUSIONS: BP and glycemic controls were suboptimal in both male and female diabetic hypertensives treated by primary care physicians. Cardiovascular disease preventive strategies have received little attention regardless of gender or other risk factors. Gender-based treatment inequities also need to be addressed.