A cost analysis of orthodontic space closure and implant treatment in patients missing maxillary lateral incisors with a long-term perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies within orthodontics present both economic and clinical findings. Missing maxillary lateral incisors is a frequently occurring anomaly. The treatment alternatives most used are orthodontic space closure and prosthetic replacement of the missing tooth. Our aim is to compare the total societal costs of orthodontic space closure (SC) and implant therapy (IT) in patients missing maxillary lateral incisors. METHODS: Records of 32 patients treated with SC (n = 18) or IT (n = 14) due to missing maxillary lateral incisors were retrieved from the archives. Direct costs and indirect costs in the short- and long-term were analysed using a cost analysis with a societal perspective up of to 12 years post-treatment. RESULTS: Comparing cases treated with SC and IT, the difference in direct short-term costs for treatment is €735.54, whereas SC is the least costly. There is no difference between SC and IT in short-term parent loss of productivity, long-term loss of productivity, costs for transportation, or direct long-term costs. A difference was found between SC and IT-in favour of SC-when comparing patients' loss of productivity (P = 0.007), short-term societal costs (P < 0.001), long-term societal costs (P = 0.037), and total societal costs (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: There is a limited number of patient records. Local factors such as subsidies, urban versus rural areas, taxes, etc. can influence monetary variables, so the transferability to other settings may be limited. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with SC have a lower total societal cost compared to patients treated with IT. There was a difference in productivity loss for patients between SC and IT; however, concerning other indirect parameters and direct long-term costs, there was no difference between the two treatments.

Camouflaging the permanent maxillary canine to substitute an absent lateral incisor - part 1: assessment and management.

There remains debate as to whether, when there is a missing maxillary lateral incisor, space should be orthodontically opened to allow for prosthetic replacement or closed to camouflage the canines to substitute the absent lateral incisor by recontouring and simple restorative procedures. Each case presents its own features which will help decision making. Treatment planning these cases is multifactorial in nature and the decision ultimately depends on factors such as the malocclusion; inter-arch and intra-arch relationship; and canine properties (size, colour and shape). The ideal treatment is the most conservative one that satisfies the individual's aesthetic and functional requirements. Often, but not always, it is therefore space closure with camouflaging of the canines as lateral incisors. Multidisciplinary planning and delivery of care is essential and 'mandatory' in the delivery of optimal outcomes. The first part of this two-part series will discuss the principles of assessment, diagnosis and management. The second part will discuss the challenges encountered and possible solutions.

Prevalence and management of patients with hypodontia: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Hypodontia is one of the most common anomalies in dentistry. Hypodontia has a negative impact on oral health-related quality of life with patients best seen in a multidisciplinary clinic to improve treatment outcomes. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of hypodontia and its association with other dental anomalies, as well as malocclusion, and to investigate the treatment planned for patients attending the clinic and whether the type of missing teeth affected the proposed treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of consecutive patients attending the hypodontia clinic at a dental hospital between February and November 2020. A total of 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Data collected included the following: age/sex; number and type of missing teeth; pre-treatment occlusion; presence of other dental anomalies; and planned treatment. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (55% female; age range = 7-41 years; mean age = 18 years) were included. Of the cohort, 47% had a class I skeletal relationship and participants were significantly less likely to have a class III skeletal or incisor relationship; 45% had another dental anomaly with the most common being microdontia. Space opening was the preferred treatment option for those managed by orthodontic treatment with resin-bonded bridges most likely to be used for restoration of spaces, 86%. CONCLUSION: Lower second premolars were the most commonly missing teeth. Participants were significantly less likely to have a class III incisor or skeletal relationship than class I or II. Space opening was the favoured approach for orthodontic treatment, particularly for maxillary lateral incisors.

Full Coverage Crowns and Resin-bonded Bridge Combination for Missing Mandibular Anterior Teeth.

Most often the anterior teeth and those that are visible when a patient speaks or smiles are chosen for esthetic restorations. The mandibular anterior fixed bridge often presents problems to the dentist due to the size of the natural teeth and their visibility. In addition, due to high cost factor, many patients are not able to afford fixed partial denture for missing anterior teeth. This article describes a cost effective technique for the restoration of missing mandibular anterior teeth by fabrication of full coverage crowns and resin-bonded fixed bridge combination.

Cost-Effective Management of Patients with Unilateral Congenitally Missing Second Maxillary Premolars.

Two case presentations are utilized to review the cost-effective treatment options in patients with unilateral congenitally missing second maxillary premolars. Once diagnosed, the dentist can either preserve or remove the respective primary molar. Preservation will lead to a tooth-size discrepancy. To limit the size of the second primary molar to the dimension of the contralateralpremolar, and to allow the preservation of alveolar bone, removal of its mesio-distal aspect should be performed. Later on, the primary molar may become infraoccluded or lost, and it will be necessary to do a coronal built-up or a prosthetic replacement respectively. Any type ofprosthetic replacement will significantly increase the total cost of treatment. Clinicians should aim for ideal occlusion and profile and take into account other orthodontic problems and propose the most appropriate treatment plan for each patient.

Limitations of a method used for adolescent assessment of smile aesthetics.

AIMS: To establish whether adolescent orthodontic patients with hypodontia have a preference between the aesthetic outcomes of two treatment strategies for lateral incisor agenesis. MATERIALS/METHODS: Standardized photographs of pre-orthodontic patients with missing lateral incisors were manipulated to produce images that represented space opening and tooth replacement in the lateral incisor space and space closure with canine substitution into the lateral incisor space. Adolescent orthodontic patients with hypodontia were recruited to assess the aesthetics of the images. A control group of subjects without tooth agenesis was recruited. Each examiner undertook two tests to assess the smile aesthetics of the images: (1) rating attractiveness using visual analogue scale (VAS) and (2) choice of preference between pairs of images. RESULTS: Difficulties experienced with image manipulation and poor intra-examiner reliability of the VAS make interpretation of the results challenging. Care should be taken if findings are used to aid clinical decisions, as the validity of the main findings is questionable. Results suggest that although adolescents perceive a difference in the aesthetic result of space opening and space closure for missing lateral incisors, the impact on the smile attractiveness is not clinically significant. When forced to choose between the aesthetics of space opening or space closure, the majority of examiners chose space opening with tooth replacement. No difference was found in smile ratings or preferences between adolescents with hypodontia and those with no missing teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The methods used in this study may not be reliable for adolescent assessment of aesthetics.

Assessment of a condition-specific quality-of-life measure for patients with developmentally absent teeth: validity and reliability testing.

OBJECTIVES: This article describes the process of validity and reliability testing of a condition-specific quality-of-life measure for patients with hypodontia presenting for orthodontic treatment. The development of the instrument is described in a previous article. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust & Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The child perception questionnaire was used as a standard against which to test criterion validity. The Bland and Altman method was used to check agreement between the two questionnaires. Construct validity was tested using principal component analysis on the four sections of the questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman method. Cronbach's alpha was used to test internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: Overall the questionnaire showed good reliability, criterion and construct validity. This together with previous evidence of good face and content validity suggests that the instrument may prove useful in clinical practice and further research. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the newly developed condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaire is both valid and reliable for use in young patients with hypodontia.

The orthodontic-restorative interface: 2. Compensating for variations in tooth number and shape.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this second article in this series of two is to outline a variety of methods which may be used to compensate for variations in tooth shape and number using a combination of orthodontic and restorative approaches. It will also provide an overview of other areas of patient care which necessitate a multi-disciplinary orthodontic/restorative approach. The article will highlight the importance of combined planning from the outset and the close relationship between the different specialties, which must be maintained throughout treatment. The methods of compensating for variations in tooth number and shape will often require contributions from both orthodontist and restorative dentist. It is important that both disciplines are involved in the assessment and treatment planning process so that they know what will be expected of them during the patient's care. Treatment planning in isolation may lead to care being delivered which is below the optimum standard which can be achieved. The orthodontist and restorative dentist are likely to liaise with the patient's general dental practitioner so that he/she can provide the restorative treatment in some cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Great improvements in aesthetics and function may be obtained using an interdisciplinary approach for patients who have variations in tooth number and shape.

The orthodontic-restorative interface: 1. Patient assessment.

UNLABELLED: The first article in this series of two aims to outline the assessment of patients for whom a combined orthodontic-restorative approach would be beneficial. In particular, it will concentrate on the assessment of patients who have hypodontia and tooth size discrepancies. The importance of the aesthetic assessment for these cases will be highlighted. Variations in tooth number and tooth size discrepancy often require a combined treatment planning approach from the orthodontist and restorative dentist. The referring general dental practitioner has a key role in recognizing that this approach may be required and highlighting this in the initial patient referral. It is likely in the more straightforward cases that the GDP will be providing the restorative treatment and so an increased understanding of these cases would be beneficial. In the second paper, treatment options will be presented. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For patients who require a combined orthodontic/restorative approach, it is important that orthodontic and restorative disciplines liaise closely in the assessment and treatment planning process so that optimal care may be planned.

Orthodontics and its interactions with other dental disciplines.

Preservation or alteration of the natural dentition to an optimal state of health, function, comfort, and esthetics remains the primary goal of dentistry. However, referral of patients by general dentists to orthodontic specialists may be complex as it involves the interaction of the two dental professionals and the patient. Because there is a marked variation in referral rates between the dentists and many patients may be referred inappropriately, a clear understanding of what is known about current orthodontic treatment possibilities, limitations and inherent risks is necessary. The purpose of this article is to outline the existing orthodontic therapeutic possibilities for adjunctive dental work and to emphasize the importance of teamwork among the general dentist, the orthodontic specialist and possibly other dental specialists during treatment planning.

Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.

An emerging technology that encompasses computed tomography, cone-beam computed tomography, and interactive software applications has slowly progressed and evolved into a necessary tool for diagnosis, treatment planning, and delivery of dental implant and associated restorative and surgical procedures. The integration of these innovative tools is helping to define new methods for appreciating anatomy, improving accuracy, and enhancing presurgical prosthetic planning to achieve true restorative-driven implant dentistry. This article will demonstrate how computed tomography combined with interactive virtual treatment-planning software applications can empower clinicians with enhanced diagnostic capabilities for implant receptor-site assessment, generating new paradigms that eventually may supersede older methods of presurgical planning for dental implant reconstruction.

Counselling patients with hypodontia.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this article is to outline the implications that a diagnosis of severe hypodontia can have on a family. This should help dentists to provide effective counselling for such patients. We will discuss the dental, psycho-social, medical, functional, educational and financial implications that this diagnosis can bring. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hypodontia is a common clinical condition encountered by general dental practitioners, so effective counselling of patients affected by this condition will help a family prepare for the implications of this diagnosis and help to improve patient satisfaction.

Modern restorative management of patients with congenitally missing teeth: 1. Introduction, terminology and epidemiology.

The management of patients with congenitally missing teeth can be a challenge and, in many cases, requires multidisciplinary care. In this four-part series, a contemporary approach to managing this group of patients is discussed. This first paper examines the terminology, epidemiology and restorative challenges that such patients can exhibit.

The management of ectodermal dysplasia and severe hypodontia. International conference statements.

An international conference on ectodermal dysplasias and hypodontia, held in London in 2004, featured a session devoted to the management of the ectodermal dysplasias and severe hypodontia. This paper presents a set of statements prepared by an international specialist panel, including representatives of patient support groups, who presented and subsequently debated a series of papers on this subject. The following topics were explored: potential roles of patient support groups; core care standards, including the roles and composition of medical and dental multidisciplinary teams for treating these conditions; the format of a baseline data set for patients with an ED; and priorities for research in ectodermal dysplasias, with particular regard to laboratory and clinical studies, and research methodology. The statements are intended to form an international framework for developing patient care pathways, and collaborative research in this field.

A costs analysis of dental treatment for ectodermal dysplasia.

OVERVIEW: Dental treatment modalities for ectodermal dysplasia (ED) vary markedly depending on the clinical manifestations, but to date there have been no studies exploring the potential economic impact of ED. On the basis of anecdotal and clinical reports, the authors postulate that costs of dental treatment for this condition can have a substantial financial impact on patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the authors' pilot study was to develop an economic model for various treatment modalities for ED with severe hypodontia. METHODS: The authors first used a comprehensive review of the literature and expert consensus to establish a treatment modalities model for ED. Next, they completed chart reviews to validate the model with sample treatment and costs information. Using these data, they then constructed a model of treatment options and associated costs. RESULTS: The sample included 24 patients with ED who had severe hypodontia. Forty-two percent were female; patients' ages ranged from 4 years, 11 months to 31 years, 1 month. Forty-two percent had dental insurance coverage, while more than one-half paid for services out of pocket. An estimated 84 percent had undergone prosthodontic treatment, 37 percent orthodontic treatment and 19 percent implant surgery. Depending on the age of the patient and types of dental treatment, there was a broad variation in costs. This ranged from $2,038 to $3,298 for those who had received prosthodontic treatment only; it ranged from $12,632 to $41,146 for those who had received a combination of prosthodontic, orthodontic and implant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Dental treatment for ED had a marked financial impact on patients and their families and varied depending on the type and duration of treatment.

Orthodontic treatment timing: a survey of orthodontists.

There has been much debate with respect to the ideal time to initiate orthodontic treatment. Recent clinical trials have tested the effects of early orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to understand orthodontists' perspectives on the best time to initiate treatment, factors that preclude early treatment, and experiences with compliance or adherence problems among their younger patients. Questionnaires were distributed to 335 practicing orthodontists throughout the United States. Respondents were first asked to indicate the best stage to initiate orthodontic treatment for 41 different types of occlusal deviations. They were then asked what conditions might preclude early orthodontic treatment. After one reminder, 137 questionnaires (41%) were returned. The sample consisted of practitioners with 3 to 52 years of experience and represented 46 different orthodontic training programs; 19% were female. The majority (92%) were in private practice. Among the 41 conditions listed, orthodontists would most likely treat 21 in the early mixed dentition, especially anterior crossbites (> 76%); 13 in the late mixed dentition, especially deepbite (> 60%) and mandibular inadequacy (> 59%); and 4 in either stage. Only two conditions would be treated in later stages (maxillary midline diastema, 43%; and congenitally missing teeth,39%). One third would postpone treating mandibular prognathism until adulthood. Patient variables that precluded treatment were behavior (98%) and compliance (96%) problems. Finances (76%) and family disruptions (57%) were less important deterrents to treatment. Orthodontists' experience with Phase I treatment influenced their decisions (p < 0.01). Orthodontists who have been in practice longer were more likely to treat temporomandibular joint sounds (p < 0.003) and deviations in opening (p < 0.002) than less experienced orthodontists; the latter were more likely to refer such patients to temporomandibular disorder specialists. These findings suggest that early orthodontic intervention is the norm, but practice characteristics affect treatment timing.

Hypodontia in 9-year-old Norwegians related to need of orthodontic treatment.

The present study reports on the prevalence of hypodontia in a Norwegian population and classifies children with hypodontia according to need of orthodontic treatment. Orthopantomograms of 1953 children (960 girls and 993 boys) at the age of 9 were available for examination. Of the boys registered with hypodontia of second premolars at the age of 9, 11.3% showed late mineralization between the ages of 9 and 12. Only 2.9% of the girls showed late mineralization. The corrected prevalence of hypodontia, excluding third molars, in the girls was 7.2%, in the boys 5.8%, and in both sexes combined 6.5%, the difference between sexes not being statistically significant. Of the children with hypodontia, 86.6% lacked only one or two permanent teeth. The most frequently missing teeth were the mandibular second premolars, the maxillary second premolars, and the maxillary lateral incisors, in that order. Classification of children with hypodontia according to need of orthodontic treatment showed that about two-thirds had hypodontia only of single posterior teeth with a moderate need of treatment. About one-third had hypodontia involving anterior teeth, and only 3.1% had hypodontia of two or more teeth in the same quadrant with a great need of treatment.