An Effective, Reproducible, and Cost-Effective Approach for Achieving Symmetry in Bicoronal Incisions in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Craniofacial Surgery.

SUMMARY: Bicoronal incisions are frequently used for exposure and access to the craniofacial skeleton. A zigzag design is often used to camouflage the resultant scar. Often, free-hand zigzag drawings require several correction attempts to ensure symmetry because of the need for replication of multiple limbs of the bicoronal incision that need to be similar lengths, distance, and angles from each other. The authors present a novel technique using a template that rapidly and consistently achieves symmetric zigzag bicoronal incisions. The device is a hairstyling device that is inherently geometric in its design. Retrospective results of pediatric craniofacial patients from 2010 to 2018 are presented. Patients undergoing endoscopic reconstructions and patients who had prior operations at other institutions were excluded from the study. Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria, with age at surgery ranging from 3 to 207 months (mean, 17 months). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 66 months (mean, 26 months). Data collected included demographics, type of surgery, and operative outcomes, including incision-related complications. Using this dynamic hairstyling device in a novel application as a template results in a fast, effective, and easily reproducible symmetric bicoronal zigzag incision in all cases. This technique eliminates the need for adjusting the length and angles of bicoronal incisions, and it can be adapted across a variety of head sizes and shapes in both pediatric and adult populations.

Assessing the Key Predictors of an Academic Career after Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship.

BACKGROUND: As craniofacial fellowship positions outnumber the availability of academic craniofacial jobs, it is important to understand the factors associated with securing an academic position after fellowship. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of bibliometric indices and trainee demographics on the ability to obtain a full-time academic plastic surgery position on completion of a craniofacial fellowship. METHODS: Craniofacial fellowship graduates between 2009 and 2018 (n = 182) were identified. Initial job placement and demographic data were collected; bibliometric indices at fellowship completion were calculated. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association of select factors with job placement. RESULTS: Of the 48.9 percent of fellows that secured academic positions, 39.3 percent trained at five fellowship institutions. The majority of those completing residency at top institutions for academic surgery and research entered academic positions at fellowship completion. Geography influenced academic placement, as 72.7 percent of trainees in the Northeast secured academic positions. Only 20.3 percent of fellows completed dedicated postgraduate research time, but among these, 70.3 percent entered academic jobs. The h-index (OR, 1.14; p = 0.01) and total manuscripts (OR, 1.04; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with academic practice while adjusting for other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Although residency training institution, geographic location, and postgraduate research may influence academic placement, the h-index and total manuscripts represent the best predictors of academic careers after craniofacial fellowship. This information is valuable for applicants who aspire to be academic craniofacial surgeons, and for programs and educators who can use these data to identify applicants with a propensity for academics.

Distrator osteogênico mandibular / Mandibular osteogenic distractor

CONTEXTO: As anomalias congênitas ou de desenvolvimento dos ossos do crânio e da face são comuns em todas as populações e podem aparecer de forma esporádica ou como parte de uma síndrome. Entre essas anomalias, as maloclusões esqueléticas são relativamente frequentes e ocorrem devido a problemas relacionados ao desenvolvimento da mandíbula, da maxila ou de ambos, tem impacto importante no posicionamento, alinhamento e funcionamento dos componentes do sistema estomatognático e podem interferir no desempenho de outros sistemas como o digestivo, respiratório e metabólico. A micrognatia ou micrognatismo são termos que se referem a anomalias importantes do tamanho da mandíbula ou maxila para caracterizar situações clínicas nas quais esses ossos são pouco desenvolvidos (hipoplásicos) ou menores do que o padrão de normalidade. Constituem as causas mais comuns de maloclusão esquelética com uma prevalência de 1 para cada 1.500 nascidos vivos e podem ocorrer de forma esporádica ou como parte de até 469 síndromes, dentre as quais as apresentações mais comuns envolvem també

Management of Rare Craniofacial Anomalies With Soft Tissue Reconstruction on Humanitarian Missions.

In poor communities, patients may suffer from health problems requiring special management that cannot be provided locally because of lack of equipment and/or expertise. Children with craniofacial anomalies represent one of these challenging problems. Visiting medical missionary teams have attempted to address these issues for a long time. This article highlights healthcare difficulties in one of the third-world countries with personally based trials for providing free surgeries in tough situation and with hardly available diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. During 15 years, >5000 surgeries were performed in repeated missionary visits. The majority of operations were to correct post-burn complications or to repair cleft lip and/or palate. Of 33 cases of rare craniofacial anomalies, 14 patients were treated with simple soft tissue reconstruction without interference in the underlying bone deformities. This may not be optimal; however, it can give good results even with the limited resources.

Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Cost Comparison among Traditional, In-House, and Commercial Options.

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) has redefined surgery, improved precision and reduced the reliance on intraoperative trial-and-error manipulations. CASS is provided by third-party services; however, it may be cost-effective for some hospitals to develop in-house programs. This study provides the first cost analysis comparison among traditional (no CASS), commercial CASS, and in-house CASS for head and neck reconstruction. METHODS: The costs of three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning for mandibular and maxillary reconstructions were obtained from an in-house CASS program at our large tertiary care hospital in Northern Virginia, as well as a commercial provider (Synthes, Paoli, PA). A cost comparison was performed among these modalities and extrapolated in-house CASS costs were derived. The calculations were based on estimated CASS use with cost structures similar to our institution and sunk costs were amortized over 10 years. RESULTS: Average operating room time was estimated at 10 hours, with an average of 2 hours saved with CASS. The hourly cost to the hospital for the operating room (including anesthesia and other ancillary costs) was estimated at $4,614/hour. Per case, traditional cases were $46,140, commercial CASS cases were $40,951, and in-house CASS cases were $38,212. Annual in-house CASS costs were $39,590. CONCLUSIONS: CASS reduced operating room time, likely due to improved efficiency and accuracy. Our data demonstrate that hospitals with similar cost structure as ours, performing greater than 27 cases of 3D head and neck reconstructions per year can see a financial benefit from developing an in-house CASS program.

Orthognathic Surgical Outcomes in Patients With and Without Craniofacial Anomalies.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to examine hospitalization outcomes after orthognathic surgery. This study tests the hypothesis that patients with craniofacial anomalies have higher billed hospital charges, longer lengths of stay, and increased odds of development of infectious complications when compared with patients without craniofacial anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the years 2012 and 2013 was used. All patients who underwent an orthognathic surgical procedure were selected. The primary independent variable of interest was presence of a congenital cleft and/or craniofacial anomaly. The outcome variables were the occurrence of complications, billed hospital charges, and length of stay. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to examine the effect of the presence of craniofacial anomalies on outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 16,515 patients underwent an orthognathic surgical procedure in the United States. Of these patients, 2,760 had a cleft and/or craniofacial anomaly. An infectious complication occurred in 7.4% of those with a craniofacial anomaly (compared with 0.6% of those without a craniofacial anomaly). The mean billed hospital charges in those with a craniofacial anomaly was $139,317 (compared with $56,189 in those without a craniofacial anomaly). The mean length of stay in the hospital in patients with a craniofacial anomaly was 8.8 days (compared with 1.8 days in those without a craniofacial anomaly). These differences in outcomes between patients with and patients without craniofacial anomalies were significant after we adjusted for patient- and hospital-level confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a craniofacial anomaly are at higher risk of development of infectious complications, have higher hospital charges, and stay in the hospital for a longer duration after orthognathic surgery when compared with those without a craniofacial anomaly.

The Drivers of Academic Success in Cleft and Craniofacial Centers: A 10-Year Analysis of over 2000 Publications.

BACKGROUND: Cleft and craniofacial centers require significant investment by medical institutions, yet variables contributing to their academic productivity remain unknown. This study characterizes the elements associated with high academic productivity in these centers. METHODS: The authors analyzed cleft and craniofacial centers accredited by the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Variables such as university affiliation; resident training; number of plastic surgery, oral-maxillofacial, and dental faculty; and investment in a craniofacial surgery, craniofacial orthodontics fellowship program, or both, were obtained. Craniofacial and cleft-related research published between July of 2005 and June of 2015 was identified. A stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to measure outcomes of total publications, summative impact factor, basic science publications, total journals, and National Institutes of Health funding. RESULTS: One hundred sixty centers were identified, comprising 920 active faculty, 34 craniofacial surgery fellowships, and eight craniofacial orthodontic fellowships; 2356 articles were published in 191 journals. Variables most positively associated with a high number of publications were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (ß = 0.608), craniofacial surgery fellowships (ß = 0.231), number of plastic surgery faculty (ß = 0.213), and university affiliation (ß = 0.165). Variables most positively associated with high a number of journals were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (ß = 0.550), university affiliation (ß = 0.251), number of plastic surgery faculty (ß = 0.230), and craniofacial surgery fellowship (ß = 0.218). Variables most positively associated with a high summative impact factor were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (ß = 0.648), craniofacial surgery fellowship (ß = 0.208), number of plastic surgery faculty (ß = 0.207), and university affiliation (ß = 0.116). Variables most positively associated with basic science publications were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (ß = 0.676) and craniofacial surgery fellowship (ß = 0.208). The only variable associated with National Institutes of Health funding was craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowship (ß = 0.332). CONCLUSION: Participation in both craniofacial surgery and orthodontics fellowships demonstrates the strongest association with academic success; craniofacial surgery fellowship, university affiliation, and number of surgeons are also predictive.

Analysis of Practice Settings for Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship Graduates in North America.

OBJECTIVE: In North America, the number of craniofacial surgery fellowship graduates is increasing, yet an analysis of practice settings upon graduation is lacking. We characterize the practice types of recent graduates of craniofacial fellowship programs in the United States and Canada. DESIGN: A 6-year cohort of craniofacial fellows in the United States and Canada (2010-2016) were obtained from craniofacial programs recognized by the American Society of Craniofacial Surgery. Practice setting was determined at 1 and 3 years of postgraduation, and predictors of practice setting were determined. RESULTS: A total of 175 craniofacial surgeons were trained at 35 fellowship programs. At 1 year of postgraduation, 33.6% had an academic craniofacial position and 27.1% were in private practice (p = 0.361). A minority of graduates pursued additional fellowships (16.4%), nonacademic craniofacial positions (10.0%), academic noncraniofacial positions (5.7%), and international practices (7.1%). At 3 years of postgraduation, the percentage of graduates in academic craniofacial positions was unchanged (34.5% vs 33.6%, p = 0.790). The strongest predictors of future academic craniofacial practice were completing plastic surgery residency at a program with a craniofacial fellowship program (odds ratio = 6.78, p < 0.001) and completing an academic craniofacial fellowship program (odds ratio = 4.48, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of craniofacial fellowship graduates practice academic craniofacial surgery. A strong academic craniofacial surgery background during residency and fellowship is associated with a future career in academic craniofacial surgery. These data may assist trainees choose training programs that align with career goals and educators select future academic surgeons.

A low-cost method of craniofacial distraction osteogenesis.

AIM: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective treatment modality for the correction of craniofacial deformities. The cost of these devices is significant and may preclude routine use of these distractors in developing countries. Hence, distraction osteogenesis was performed using medical equipment that was readily available in any hospital at minimal cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2013, a retrospective study was performed on infants and neonates who underwent primary distraction for craniofacial abnormalities. Midface or mandibular distraction was performed because of respiratory impairment and/or globe exposure. The apparatus used included Steinmann pins, stainless steel wires, attachment bolts, orthopaedic pulleys, string and intravenous bags for weights. For midface distraction, a transzygomatic pin was inserted, and a transmandibular pin or a cerclage wire was inserted into the mandible through the symphysis or body of the mandible and connected to the pulley system. RESULTS: Distraction osteogenesis was performed on five patients - three mandibular distractions (Pierre Robin sequence) and two transfacial distractions (Apert syndrome/Pfeiffer syndrome type III). The mean age, duration of distraction and duration of consolidation at the time of distraction was 60.5 days, 18.6 days and 16.4 days, respectively. The mean length of distraction achieved was 12 mm. Common complications observed were pin loosening, pressure necrosis of the skin and uneven pull. A major disadvantage was the longer hospital stay required. CONCLUSION: The African method of distraction is effective, easy and cost effective and could be used in third-world hospitals where surgical expertise or expensive distraction sets are not freely available.

Study of Treatment Expense of Patients with Congenital Malformations of Craniofacial in Srinagarind Hospital between 2010 and 2014.

Objectives: To report the treatment expenses of the congenital malformations of craniofacial of in-patients of Srinagarind Hospital between 2010 and 2014 Material and Method: The expenses of congenital malformations of craniofacial in-patients of Srinagarind Hospital were studied by analyzing the actual amount charged and the reimbursement of treatment expenses. Results: One thousand eight hundred forty five in-patients were treated 2,144 times. The average treatment was about once or twice per person. Male patients were 54.1% and female were 45.9%. About 84% of the patients were under the universal coverage, with an average Relative Weight (RW) between 2010 and 2014 of 1.6988, 1.7059, 1.4847, 1.4165, and 1.5096, respectively. The average of the RW and the treatment expenses differentiated by the patients' eligible medical expenses for self-paid, Government or State Enterprise Officer (OFC), Social Security Scheme (SSS), and universal coverage (UC) were 1.0398, 1.1596, 1.2759, 1.3477, respectively. The average RW calculated under diagnosis-related group (DRG) for each patient was 1.3148. The estimated RW of OFC at 13,378 and UC at 9,600 baht per RW were 18,081, 14,535, 14,259, and 17,118 baht, for an average of 16,842 baht. The average of the treatment expenses charged by the hospital to the OFC was 14,535 baht and to the UC was 17,118 baht for each treatment. The treatment expense under DRG was lower than the cost under the hospital charge by 2,051,072 baht. Conclusion: The present study analyzed the treatment expense by patients' eligible medical expenses between 2010 and 2014. The universal coverage and government or state enterprise officer's charges were reimbursed to the hospital under DRG system for 32,257,000 baht while the hospitals actual charges were 34,308,072 baht. This indicated that Srinagarind Hospital must set up the fund to support congenital malformations of craniofacial patients for a minimum sum of 410,214 baht per year. This is likely to increase in the future.

Optimizing Hybrid Occlusion in Face-Jaw-Teeth Transplantation: A Preliminary Assessment of Real-Time Cephalometry as Part of the Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution Workstation for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aesthetic and functional outcomes surrounding Le Fort-based, face-jaw-teeth transplantation have been suboptimal, often leading to posttransplant class II/III skeletal profiles, palatal defects, and "hybrid malocclusion." Therefore, a novel technology-real-time cephalometry-was developed to provide the surgical team instantaneous, intraoperative knowledge of three-dimensional dentoskeletal parameters. METHODS: Mock face-jaw-teeth transplantation operations were performed on plastic and cadaveric human donor/recipient pairs (n = 2). Preoperatively, cephalometric landmarks were identified on donor/recipient skeletons using segmented computed tomographic scans. The computer-assisted planning and execution workstation tracked the position of the donor face-jaw-teeth segment in real time during the placement/inset onto recipient, reporting pertinent hybrid cephalometric parameters from any movement of donor tissue. The intraoperative data measured through real-time cephalometry were compared to posttransplant measurements for accuracy assessment. In addition, posttransplant cephalometric relationships were compared to planned outcomes to determine face-jaw-teeth transplantation success. RESULTS: Compared with postoperative data, the real-time cephalometry-calculated intraoperative measurement errors were 1.37 ± 1.11 mm and 0.45 ± 0.28 degrees for the plastic skull and 2.99 ± 2.24 mm and 2.63 ± 1.33 degrees for the human cadaver experiments. These results were comparable to the posttransplant relations to planned outcome (human cadaver experiment, 1.39 ± 1.81 mm and 2.18 ± 1.88 degrees; plastic skull experiment, 1.06 ± 0.63 mm and 0.53 ± 0.39 degrees). CONCLUSION: Based on this preliminary testing, real-time cephalometry may be a valuable adjunct for adjusting and measuring "hybrid occlusion" in face-jaw-teeth transplantation and other orthognathic surgical procedures.

A model for interprofessional health care: lessons learned from craniofacial teams.

Seventy-six years ago, Herbert K. Cooper, DDS, DSc, LHD, FACD, created the first interprofessional health care team in response to the frequency of craniofacial anomalies and related speech and hearing deficits in Lancaster, Pa. His experiences and those from subsequent "medical-dental-nursing-pharmacy allied health professions" craniofacial teams inform and provide "best practices" for the future of interprofessional education. This paper revisits the genesis of craniofacial teams and highlights successes, challenges and cost benefits applicable today.

Scalable, sustainable cost-effective surgical care: a model for safety and quality in the developing world, part I: challenge and commitment.

BACKGROUND: With an estimated backlog of 4,000,000 patients worldwide, cleft lip and cleft palate remain a stark example of the global burden of surgical disease. The need for a new paradigm in global surgery has been increasingly recognized by governments, funding agencies, and professionals to exponentially expand care while emphasizing safety and quality. This three-part article examines the evolution of the Operation Smile Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center (GCCCC) as an innovative model for sustainable cleft care in the developing world. METHODS: The GCCCC is the result of a unique public-private partnership between government, charity, and private enterprise. In 2009, Operation Smile, the Government of Assam, the National Rural Health Mission, and the Tata Group joined together to work towards the common goal of creating a center of excellence in cleft care for the region. RESULTS: This partnership combined expertise in medical care and training, organizational structure and management, local health care infrastructure, and finance. A state-of-the-art surgical facility was constructed in Guwahati, Assam which includes a modern integrated operating suite with an open layout, advanced surgical equipment, sophisticated anesthesia and monitoring capabilities, central medical gases, and sterilization facilities. CONCLUSION: The combination of established leaders and dreamers from different arenas combined to create a synergy of ambitions, resources, and compassion that became the backbone of success in Guwahati.

Scalable, sustainable cost-effective surgical care: a model for safety and quality in the developing world, part II: program development and quality care.

BACKGROUND: The Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center (GCCCC) is committed to free medical and surgical care to patients afflicted with facial deformities in Assam, India. A needs-based approach was utilized to assemble numerous teams, processes of care, and systems aimed at providing world-class care to the most needy of patients, and to assist them with breaking through the barriers that prohibit them from obtaining services. METHODS: A team of international professionals from various disciplines served in Guwahati full time to implement and oversee patient care and training of local counterparts. Recruitment of local professionals in all disciplines began early in the scheme of the program and led to gradual expansion of all medical teams. Emphasis was placed on achieving optimal outcome for each patient treated, as opposed to treating the maximum number of patients. RESULTS: The center is open year round to offer full-time services and follow-up care. Along with surgery, GCCCC provides speech therapy, child life counseling, dental care, otolaryngology, orthodontics, and nutrition services for the cleft patients under one roof. Local medical providers participated in a model of graded responsibility commiserate with individualized skill and progress, and gradually assumed all leadership positions and now account for 92% of the workforce. Institutional infrastructure improvements positioned and empowered teams of skilled local providers while implementing systemized perioperative processes. CONCLUSION: This needs-based approach to program development in Guwahati was successful in optimization of quality and safety in all clinical divisions.

Craniofacial surgery in a tertiary care center in India.

Craniofacial surgery, one of the newest subspecialties of plastic surgery, has taken roots in India. The author, after having trained with Dr Ian Jackson at USA, started this facility in Chandigarh at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in 1995. The hospital caters to a population of approximately 100 million. To date, approximately 1000 major craniofacial procedures have been performed. A wide spectrum of cases belonging to congenital and acquired craniofacial deformities have been managed and followed up over a long period. The pattern of these deformities is different from those seen in the Western world. The complication rate has been comparable to any craniofacial unit in the developed countries. We have suggested ways to augment the existing facilities in India.

Scalable, sustainable cost-effective surgical care: a model for safety and quality in the developing world, part III: impact and sustainability.

BACKGROUND: The Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center (GCCCC) utilizes a high-volume, subspecialized institution to provide safe, quality, and comprehensive and cost-effective surgical care to a highly vulnerable patient population. METHODS: The GCCCC utilized a diagonal model of surgical care delivery, with vertical inputs of mission-based care transitioning to investments in infrastructure and human capital to create a sustainable, local care delivery system. Over the first 2.5 years of service (May 2011-November 2013), the GCCCC made significant advances in numerous areas. Progress was meticulously documented to evaluate performance and provide transparency to stakeholders including donors, government officials, medical oversight bodies, employees, and patients. RESULTS: During this time period, the GCCCC provided free operations to 7,034 patients, with improved safety, outcomes, and multidisciplinary services while dramatically decreasing costs and increasing investments in the local community. The center has become a regional referral cleft center, and governments of surrounding states have contracted the GCCCC to provide care for their citizens with cleft lip and cleft palate. Additional regional and global impact is anticipated through continued investments into education and training, comprehensive services, and research and outcomes. CONCLUSION: The success of this public private partnership demonstrates the value of this model of surgical care in the developing world, and offers a blueprint for reproduction. The GCCCC experience has been consistent with previous studies demonstrating a positive volume-outcomes relationship, and provides evidence for the value of the specialty hospital model for surgical delivery in the developing world.