Lymphatic endothelium-specific hyaluronan receptor LYVE-1 is expressed by stabilin-1+, F4/80+, CD11b+ macrophages in malignant tumours and wound healing tissue in vivo and in bone marrow cultures in vitro: implications for the assessment of lymphangiogenesis.

Lymphangiogenesis is a novel prognostic parameter for several cancers that is preferentially quantified by immunohistochemistry of the lymphatic endothelium-specific hyaluronan receptor LYVE-1. Recently, the specificity of LYVE-1 was challenged by serendipitous observations of LYVE-1 expression in rare tissue macrophages. As expression of the hyaluronan receptor-like molecule stabilin-1 is shared by sinusoidal endothelium and macrophages, a thorough analysis of LYVE-1 expression was performed using macrophage-specific markers in vivo and in vitro. In murine tumour models and excisional wound healing, LYVE-1 expression occurred in a subset of CD11b(+), F4/80(+) tissue macrophages that preferentially co-expressed stabilin-1. Upon comparison of single- and double-labelling immunofluorescence, it became apparent that LYVE-1(+) macrophages mimic sprouting and collapsed lymphatic vessels. In vitro, LYVE-1 expression was induced in 25-40% of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages upon exposure to B16F1 melanoma-conditioned medium and IL-4/dexamethasone. By FACS analysis, 11.5% of bone marrow-derived macrophages were LYVE-1(+), stabilin-1(+) double-positive, while 9.9% were LYVE-1(+), stabilin-1(-) and 33.5% were LYVE-1(-), stabilin-1(+). Northern and western analyses confirmed expression of LYVE-1 mRNA and protein in bone marrow-derived macrophages. In the light of the current debate about true endothelial trans-differentiation versus endothelial mimicry of monocytes/macrophages, LYVE-1(+), stabilin-1(+) non-continuous endothelial-like macrophages will require further developmental and functional analyses. In conclusion, the findings imply that LYVE-1 staining must be supplemented by double labelling with macrophage markers in order to differentiate clearly between LYVE-1(+) lymphatics and LYVE-1(+) tumour-infiltrating macrophages. This improved approach will help to clarify the prognostic significance of lymphangiogenesis in malignant tumours.

Assessment of neutrophil activation in whole blood by flow cytometry.

Flow cytometry methods currently used for measuring neutrophil activation involve sample manipulation, which may result in cellular depletion and artifactual activation. To design a new methodology for measurement of neutrophil activation with minimal sample manipulation. Oxidative burst and CD 11b neutrophil expression were simultaneously assessed by a new no-lyse no-wash technique and a standard lyse-method in 10 pediatric patients with recurrent infections and two patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). The new technique was based on nucleic acid staining to discriminate erythrocytes and debris without requiring physical separation. Both methods served equally to confirm or eliminate the diagnosis of CGD and leukocyte adhesion deficiency type 1. The values of baseline CD11b and oxidative burst obtained using the lysis method were significantly higher than those obtained by the no-lyse no-wash method. After activation, the lysis method resulted in higher neutrophil depletion (41%vs. 19%, P = 0.03). When compared with standard methods, neutrophil activation assessment by a no-lyse no-wash method resulted in lower neutrophil depletion and differences in oxidative burst and CD11b neutrophil values.

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plus citrate-theophylline-adenosine-dipyridamole (EDTA-CTAD): a novel anticoagulant for the flow cytometric assessment of platelet and neutrophil activation ex vivo in whole blood.

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is the anticoagulant recommended for full blood counts, citrate is recommended for coagulation and platelet studies, and citrate-theophylline-adenosine-dipyridamole (CTAD) inhibits platelet activation. Because the combination of EDTA and CTAD (E/C) is better than EDTA or CTAD alone for measuring platelet parameters on the ADVIA 120 Haematology System, we investigated whether it also offers advantages for the flow cytometric assessment of platelet and/or neutrophil activation and platelet-leucocyte aggregate formation ex vivo. Blood from healthy subjects was collected into E/C or citrate, kept at room temperature or at 4 degrees C, and analysed 0 to 360 min later in the ADVIA 120 and by immunofluorescent flow cytometry. Platelet count, mean platelet volume, number of platelet clumps, mean platelet component, numbers of CD62P(+) platelets and platelet-leucocyte aggregates, and expression of CD11b on neutrophils changed little over 360 min in blood with E/C kept at 4 degrees C. In contrast, one or more parameter changed when blood was kept with E/C at ambient temperature or with citrate at either temperature. The use of E/C in in vitro and in vivo studies is illustrated. Platelet and neutrophil activation status ex vivo can be reliably assessed if blood is collected into E/C, held at 4 degrees C, and analysed within 6 h.