Immunohistochemistry utilization in the diagnosis of melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The use of immunohistochemical (IHC) stains in dermatopathology is commonplace; however, little is known regarding utilization trends in melanoma diagnosis. Current Medicare local coverage determinations (LCDs) state that most pigmented lesions, including melanoma, can be diagnosed using H&E alone. METHODS: Histopathology reports for all biopsy-proven melanomas excised between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018, at a single dermatology clinic, were identified with the following parameters abstracted: laboratory/dermatopathologist rendering the diagnosis, whether IHC was performed, type/number of stains utilized, presence/depth of invasion, and melanoma subtype. The association of characteristics with IHC utilization was evaluated using χ2 test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty six eligible melanomas were identified. IHC was employed in 228 (64%) of the diagnoses. Invasive melanoma was diagnosed in 199 cases (55.9%) while 157 (44.1%) were identified as melanoma in situ (MIS). Of the 228 that utilized IHC, 117 were performed on invasive melanoma (58.8%) and 111 were performed on MIS (70.7%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a higher IHC usage for the diagnosis of melanoma than previously reported. Existing LCDs regarding IHC utilization in melanoma do not reflect the current state of practice. Further investigation regarding IHC utilization and the development of appropriate-use criteria for melanoma IHC is necessary.

Expression of soluble adenylyl cyclase in lentigo maligna: use of immunohistochemistry with anti-soluble adenylyl cyclase antibody (R21) in diagnosis of lentigo maligna and assessment of margins.

CONTEXT: Soluble adenylyl cyclase (sAC) is an enzyme that generates cyclic adenosine monophosphate, a signaling molecule involved in regulating melanocyte functions. R21, a mouse monoclonal antibody against sAC, shows a striking pan-nuclear staining in lentigo maligna, indicating possible utility for diagnosis and margin assessment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate R21 in the diagnosis and evaluation of margins in lentigo maligna. DESIGN: Thirty one re-excision specimens for lentigo maligna were evaluated for R21 expression using previously published protocol. In addition, 153 cases including 41 lentigo malignas, 30 non-lentigo maligna-type melanomas, 38 lentigos, and 44 nevi were evaluated using a modified stringent protocol to eliminate all nonmelanocyte staining. RESULTS: The sensitivity of nuclear staining with R21 in lentigo maligna was 87.8%. Nuclear expression of sAC was observed in 40% of other melanomas and 2.3% of benign nevi. R21 did not stain nuclei of resting melanocytes but was observed in 28.9% of melanocytic hyperplasias. These cases were easily distinguished from lentigo maligna in routine sections. R21 staining facilitated extent of the lesion in resection margins. In cases examined under the less stringent conditions, interpretation was facilitated by comparing R21 and Mart1/Melan A staining. Greater than 9 pan-nuclear staining melanocytes within one high-power field along with a pan-nuclear sAC/Melan A ratio greater than 0.5 was consistent with a positive margin whereas 5 or less pan-nuclear staining melanocytes along with a sAC/Melan A ratio of less than 0.3 constituted a negative margin. CONCLUSION: R21 is a useful diagnostic adjunct in the diagnosis and evaluation of margins in re-excision specimens in lentigo maligna.

Immunohistochemical dual staining as an adjunct in assessment of mitotic activity in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The mitotic rate was introduced as a major prognostic criterion for the staging of thin (≤1.0 mm) melanoma by the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging and Classification (seventh edition). The detection of a single mitotic figure changes the tumor stage in thin melanoma. We sought to address the value of a dual staining to facilitate the determination of the mitotic rate and to assign the mitotic activity to melanocytes. METHODS: The mitotic rate of melanoma cells was determined by dual phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3)/Melan-A immunohistochemistry. Results were compared with PHH3 staining alone and conventional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides of 15 melanomas with a tumor thickness <1.0 mm. RESULTS: PHH3 staining clearly labeled cells in the mitotic cell cycle. The mitotic rate in the PHH3/Melan-A dual stain was equal to that derived by H&E staining. Time required for counting mitotic figures was significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of mitotic rate with an immunohistochemical dual stain is faster (mean 63.0%) and more reliable than evaluation by routine H&E staining alone. Dual staining immunohistochemistry may be a useful additional tool to standardize the determination of mitotic rate and may be helpful in evaluation of challenging cases.