Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 49(2): 59-65, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28294585

RESUMO

SUMMARY: Background. Volumetric pollen traps are commonly used to assess pollen exposure. These traps are well suited for estimating the regional mean airborne pollen concentration but are likely not to provide an accurate index of personal exposure. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that hair sampling may provide different pollen counts from those from pollen traps, especially when the pollen exposure is diverse. Methods. We compared pollen counts in hair washes to counts provided by stationary volumetric and gravimetric pollen traps in 2 different settings: urban with volunteers living in short distance from one another and from the static trap and suburban in which volunteers live in a scattered environment, quite far from the static trap. Results. Pollen counts in hair washes are in full agreement with trap counts for uniform pollen exposure. In contrast, for diverse pollen exposure, .individual pollen counts in hair washes vary strongly in quantity and taxa composition between individuals and dates. These results demonstrate that the pollen counts method (hair washes vs. stationary pollen traps) may lead to different absolute and relative contributions of taxa to the total pollen count. Conclusions. In a geographic area with a high diversity of environmental exposure to pollen, static pollen traps, in contrast to hair washes, do not provide a reliable estimate of this higher diversity.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Alérgenos/análise , Antígenos de Plantas/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/instrumentação , Cabelo/química , Exposição por Inalação , Pólen , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/imunologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Cabelo/imunologia , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Pólen/imunologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Saúde Suburbana , Saúde da População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
2.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 83: 1-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26032632

RESUMO

Mo-CBP3 is an antifungal protein produced by Moringa oleifera which has been investigated as potential candidate for developing transgenic crops. Before the use of novel proteins, food safety tests must be conducted. This work represents an early food safety assessment of Mo-CBP3, using the two-tiered approach proposed by ILSI. The history of safe use, mode of action and results for amino acid sequence homology using the full-length and short contiguous amino acids sequences indicate low risk associated to this protein. Mo-CBP3 isoforms presented a reasonable number of alignments (>35% identity) with allergens in a window of 80 amino acids. This protein was resistant to pepsin degradation up to 2 h, but it was susceptible to digestion using pancreatin. Many positive attributes were presented for Mo-CBP3. However, this protein showed high sequence homology with allergens and resistance to pepsin digestion that indicates that further hypothesis-based testing on its potential allergenicity must be done. Additionally, animal toxicity evaluations (e.g. acute and repeated dose oral exposure assays) must be performed to meet the mandatory requirements of several regulatory agencies. Finally, the approach adopted here exemplified the importance of performing an early risk assessment of candidate proteins for use in plant transformation programs.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Alimentares/efeitos adversos , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/efeitos adversos , Modelos Moleculares , Moringa oleifera/metabolismo , Proteínas de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Sementes/metabolismo , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/química , Alérgenos/genética , Alérgenos/metabolismo , Ração Animal/efeitos adversos , Ração Animal/microbiologia , Animais , Antígenos de Plantas/química , Antígenos de Plantas/genética , Antígenos de Plantas/metabolismo , Brasil , Quitina/metabolismo , Proteínas Alimentares/química , Proteínas Alimentares/metabolismo , Digestão , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/microbiologia , Humanos , Ligantes , Fungos Mitospóricos/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Moringa oleifera/genética , Controle Biológico de Vetores/métodos , Proteínas de Plantas/química , Proteínas de Plantas/genética , Proteínas de Plantas/metabolismo , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/efeitos adversos , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/genética , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas/metabolismo , Isoformas de Proteínas/efeitos adversos , Isoformas de Proteínas/química , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Medição de Risco , Sementes/genética , Homologia de Sequência de Aminoácidos
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23802714

RESUMO

Peanut allergy affects up to 2% of consumers and is responsible for the majority of fatalities caused by food-induced anaphylaxis. Peanut-containing products must be clearly labelled. Manufacturers are not legally required to label peanut if its inclusion resulted from unintentional cross contact with foods manufactured in the same facility. However, the use of allergen advisory statements alerting consumers of the potential presence of peanut allergen has increased in recent years. In previous studies, the vast majority of foods with precautionary allergen statements did not contain detectable levels of peanut, but no data are available on Irish food products. Thirty-eight food products bearing peanut/nut allergen-related statements were purchased from multiple locations in the Republic of Ireland and analysed for the presence of peanut. Peanut was detected in at least one lot in 5.3% (2 of 38) of the products tested. The doses of peanut detected ranged from 0.14 mg to 0.52 mg per suggested serving size (0.035-0.13 mg peanut protein). No detectable levels of peanut were found in the products that indicated peanut/nuts as a minor ingredient. Quantitative risk assessment, based on the known distribution of individual threshold doses for peanut, indicates that only a very small percentage of the peanut-allergic population would be likely to experience an allergic reaction to those products while the majority of products with advisory labels appear safe for the peanut-allergic population. Food manufacturers should be encouraged to analyse products manufactured in shared facilities and even on shared equipment with peanuts for peanut residues to determine whether sufficient risk exists to warrant the use of advisory labelling. Although it appears that the majority of food products bearing advisory nut statements are in fact free of peanut contamination, advice to peanut allergy sufferers to avoid said foods should continue in Ireland and therefore in the wider European Union.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Plantas/análise , Arachis/química , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Análise de Alimentos , Contaminação de Alimentos , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/dietoterapia , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Arachis/efeitos adversos , Doces/efeitos adversos , Doces/análise , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/legislação & jurisprudência , Grão Comestível/efeitos adversos , Grão Comestível/química , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Fast Foods/efeitos adversos , Fast Foods/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Manipulação de Alimentos , Rotulagem de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Irlanda , Legislação sobre Alimentos , Limite de Detecção , Método de Monte Carlo , Medição de Risco , Sementes/efeitos adversos , Sementes/química
4.
J Agric Food Chem ; 61(24): 5624-33, 2013 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23323855

RESUMO

Food allergy represents an important food safety issue because of the potential lethal effects; the only effective treatment is the complete removal of the allergen involved from the diet. However, due to the growing complexity of food formulations and food processing, foods may be unintentionally contaminated via allergen-containing ingredients or cross-contamination. This affects not only consumers' well-being but also food producers and competent authorities involved in inspecting and auditing food companies. To address these issues, the food industry and control agencies rely on available analytical methods to quantify the amount of a particular allergic commodity in a food and thus to decide upon its safety. However, no "gold standard methods" exist for the quantitative detection of food allergens. Nowadays mostly receptor-based methods and in particular commercial kits are used in routine analysis. However, upon evaluation of their performances, commercial assays proved often to be unreliable in processed foods, attributed to the chemical changes in proteins that affect the molecular recognition with the receptor used. Unfortunately, the analytical outcome of other methods, among which are chromatographic combined with mass spectrometric techniques as well as DNA-based methods, seem to be affected in a comparable way by food processing. Several strategies can be employed to improve the quantitative analysis of allergens in foods. Nevertheless, issues related to extractability and matrix effects remain a permanent challenge. In view of the presented results, it is clear that the food industry needs to continue to make extra efforts to provide accurate labeling and to reduce the contamination with allergens to an acceptable level through the use of allergen risk management on a company level, which needs to be supported inevitably by a tailor-validated extraction and detection method.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Inspeção de Alimentos/métodos , Tecnologia de Alimentos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Alérgenos/análise , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/análise , União Europeia , Alimentos/normas , Contaminação de Alimentos/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Inspeção de Alimentos/normas , Inspeção de Alimentos/tendências , Rotulagem de Alimentos/normas , Tecnologia de Alimentos/tendências , Humanos , Legislação sobre Alimentos
5.
J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) ; 59(5): 462-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24418881

RESUMO

Miso paste (miso), a fermented soybean food, is popular in Japan and other Asian countries. However, the soybean is known to induce an allergenic response in some individuals. In the present study, we evaluated the allergenicity of various kinds of miso available in Japan. Total proteins were extracted from Amakuti-kome miso, Karakuti-kome miso, Mugi-miso and Mame-miso, and the protein profiles were analyzed. The major protein bands detected in the intact soybean extract were not present in any of the miso samples, which instead showed various low molecular weight protein bands of approximately 10-25 kDa. The existence levels of six major soybean allergens were determined by Western blotting using specific antibodies. We found that the allergen levels varied among miso and allergen types; however, allergen levels were consistently lower in miso than in the soybean extract. We obtained similar results for IgE-ELISA experiments using serum IgE from soybean allergy patients. Taken together, these results indicate that compared to soybean extract, various types of miso contain small quantities of intact soybean allergens. Additionally, several lines of evidence indicated that the allergen levels were exceptionally low in the dark-colored Karakuti-kome miso and Mame-miso, which are produced with relatively long fermentation periods, suggesting that the duration of fermentation might be a key factor in the hypoallergenicity of miso.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Antígenos de Plantas/análise , Dieta , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Alimentos de Soja/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Soja/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/química , Alérgenos/metabolismo , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/química , Antígenos de Plantas/metabolismo , Aspergillus/metabolismo , Bacillus/metabolismo , Western Blotting , Dieta/etnologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Fermentação , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/sangue , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/análise , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Japão , Peso Molecular , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/análise , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/isolamento & purificação , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/metabolismo , Pigmentação , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/química , Proteólise , Alimentos de Soja/análise , Alimentos de Soja/economia , Alimentos de Soja/microbiologia , Proteínas de Soja/análise , Proteínas de Soja/química , Proteínas de Soja/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 42(5): 178-85, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21192626

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemic asthma outbreaks are potentially a very high-risk medical situation in seaport towns where large volumes of soybean are loaded and unloaded Airborne allergen assessment plays a pivotal role in evaluating the resulting environmental pollution. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the airborne Gly m 1 allergen level in the seaport of Ancona in order assess the soybean-specific allergenic risk for the city. METHODS: Allergen and PM10 were evaluated at progressive distances from the port area. Allergen analysis was performed by monoclonal antibody-based immunoassay on the sampled filters. Daily meteorological data were obtained from the local meteorological station. For estimating the assimilative capacity of the atmosphere, an approach based on dispersive ventilation coefficient was tried. RESULTS: The allergen concentrations detected were low (range = 0.4-171 ng/m3). A decreasing gradient of the airborne allergen from the unloading area (22.1 +/- 41.2 ng/m3) to the control area (0.6 +/- 0.7 ng/m3) was detected. The concentration of the airborne Gly m 1 was not coupled with the presence of the soy-carrying ships in the port. A statistically significant relationship between airborne allergen, PM10 and local meteorological parameters quantifies the association with the atmospheric condition. CONCLUSION: Airborne Gly m 1 is part of the atmospheric dust of Ancona. The low level of this allergen seems consistent with the absence of asthma epidemic outbreak.


Assuntos
Ar/análise , Alérgenos/química , Antígenos de Plantas/química , Asma/epidemiologia , Monitoramento Ambiental , Proteínas de Plantas/química , Alérgenos/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Asma/etiologia , Asma/imunologia , Cidades , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Epidemias , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Humanos , Itália , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Plantas/imunologia , Grupos Populacionais , Medição de Risco , Glycine max/imunologia
7.
Risk Anal ; 30(1): 7-19, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20002890

RESUMO

Peanut allergy is a public health concern, owing to the high prevalence in France and the severity of the reactions. Despite peanut-containing product avoidance diets, a risk may exist due to the adventitious presence of peanut allergens in a wide range of food products. Peanut is not mentioned in their ingredients list, but precautionary labeling is often present. A method of quantifying the risk of allergic reactions following the consumption of such products is developed, taking the example of peanut in chocolate tablets. The occurrence of adventitious peanut proteins in chocolate and the dose-response relationship are estimated with a Bayesian approach using available published data. The consumption pattern is described by the French individual consumption survey INCA2. Risk simulations are performed using second-order Monte Carlo simulations, which separately propagates variability and uncertainty of the model input variables. Peanut allergens occur in approximately 36% of the chocolates, leading to a mean exposure level of 0.2 mg of peanut proteins per eating occasion. The estimated risk of reaction averages 0.57% per eating occasion for peanut-allergic adults. The 95% values of the risk stand between 0 and 3.61%, which illustrates the risk variability. The uncertainty, represented by the 95% credible intervals, is concentrated around these risk estimates. Children have similar results. The conclusion is that adventitious peanut allergens induce a risk of reaction for a part of the French peanut-allergic population. The method developed can be generalized to assess the risk due to the consumption of every foodstuff potentially contaminated by allergens.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Arachis/efeitos adversos , Arachis/imunologia , Cacau/efeitos adversos , Cacau/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Criança , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , França , Humanos , Modelos Imunológicos , Modelos Estatísticos , Método de Monte Carlo , Medição de Risco
8.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 39(3): 394-400, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19134018

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose (300IR) of a five-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablet in terms of efficacy was previously demonstrated from the first pollen season. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aim to confirm whether this dose remained optimal during the peak of the pollen season by assessing the efficacy and quality of life data. METHODS: A total of 628 subjects with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, pan-European trial. Subjects received once-daily tablets (Stallergenes, Antony, France) of 100IR, 300IR, 500IR or placebo, starting 4 months before and throughout the 2005 grass pollen season. The pollen season was defined as the first day of 3 consecutive days with a grass pollen count above 30 grains/m(3) of air, recorded using Hirst-type volumetric pollen traps, to the last day before 3 consecutive days with a pollen count below 30 grains/m(3). RESULTS: The grass pollen season lasted an average of 30 days, with a peak of 12 days. The mean treatment duration before the grass pollen season was similar in the four treatment groups (121.4+/-31.1 to 128.6+/-15.4 days in the safety population). Both the 300IR and 500IR groups had highly significant improvements in Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) vs. placebo at the peak pollen season (P=0.0005 and 0.0014, respectively), which agreed with improvements in RTSS in the primary evaluations. The average RTSS scores were slightly elevated during the peak pollen season in all treatment groups. The overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire score confirmed the optimal dosage 300IR at peak (P<0.0001) and at the end (P< or =0.0031) of the pollen season. All doses were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: At the peak pollen season, the efficacy and quality of life data for both 300IR and 500IR groups was significantly improved vs. the placebo group. These results confirm the conclusions of the primary evaluations and validate the use of 300IR tablets for clinical practice.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Plantas/administração & dosagem , Conjuntivite Alérgica/terapia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Poaceae/imunologia , Pólen/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 33(6): 296-302, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16371215

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the health and monetary consequences of treating allergy with specific immunotherapy (SIT) compared with symptomatic treatment/standard care among patients with grass pollen or mite allergy. METHODS: We performed an economic analysis based on 253 grass- and/or mite allergic patients who started SIT from 1.1.1996 to 1.1.2002 at the Allergy Unit, Aarhus University Hospital and at a specialist practice in Aarhus. Relevant data were collected before, during and after SIT treatment from the national health service based on each patient's personal identification number and medical records and from a specifically designed questionnaire. A cost-benefit analysis including direct and indirect costs before, during and after SIT was performed. In addition direct costs were related to the clinical effect (improvement in well-being) in the form of a cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: The direct cost per patient/year before SIT (equivalent to standard care) was DKK 2,580. The investment in SIT was DKK 27,545 (in present values) per patient over a 4-year period. After SIT the cost was reduced to DKK 1,072 per patient/year. In the long term, prospective introduction of SIT incurred additional present-value direct costs of DKK 13,676 per patient treated and DKK 2,784 per patient/year of improved well-being. However, when indirect costs were included in the economic evaluation SIT was shown to be net beneficial. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that SIT is associated with initial resource investments and subsequent resource savings in the long term compared with standard care. When all consequences are measured in monetary terms, and assuming that sick days are associated with a loss of productivity, this analysis suggests that SIT increases societal welfare. This conclusion also holds if there is no loss of productivity.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/uso terapêutico , Dessensibilização Imunológica/economia , Ácaros/imunologia , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Absenteísmo , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos dos fármacos , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Atividades de Lazer , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poaceae , Pólen/imunologia , Prática Privada , Rinite Alérgica Perene/economia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/economia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transporte de Pacientes/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA