Implications of Under-Reporting Medication Side Effects: Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure as a Case Example.

INTRODUCTION: Perceiving medication side effects but not reporting them to a clinician is common. Patterns of "under-reporting" and their implications are not well described. We aimed to address this gap by examining patterns of under-reporting perceived side effects of beta-blockers among patients with heart failure. METHODS: In 2016, a survey that evaluated medication-taking behavior was administered to 1114 participants (46.5% response rate) from The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort with prior adjudicated heart failure hospitalization or a heart failure Medicare claim. We examined the results of survey respondents who reported taking a beta-blocker to understand patterns of under-reporting perceived beta-blocker side effects. We defined an under-reporter as a participant who perceived experiencing a side effect from their beta-blocker but did not share it with their clinician (according to survey responses). We conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify determinants of being an under-reporter. Co-variates included age, sex, race, income, level of education, geographical location, and pill burden. We also examined whether under-reporters differed in self-reported medication adherence and willingness to take additional medication to prevent a future healthcare encounter compared to participants who reported perceived side effects to their clinicians and those who did not experience side effects. RESULTS: Among 310 respondents, 28% (n = 87) were under-reporters. Black race (odds ratio 2.11, confidence interval 1.21-3.67) and education less than college (odds ratio 2.00, confidence interval 1.09-3.67) were associated with being an under-reporter. Self-reported medication adherence was similar between groups (under-reporters: 46.3%; those who reported perceived side effects: 49.4%; those who did not experience side effects: 45.0%); under-reporters were more frequently unwilling to take additional medication to prevent a doctor's visit (18.9% vs 12.1% vs 10.8%), emergency room visit (21.6% vs 13.3% vs 9.9%), and hospitalization (17.6% vs 10.8% vs 9.0%) compared with the other groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that under-reporting perceived side effects of beta-blockers among adults with heart failure is common, is associated with Black race and low education, and may contribute to patient willingness to take additional medication to prevent future medical encounters.

Preoperative ß-Blocker Therapy and Stroke or Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative ß-blocker therapy has been associated with increased risk of stroke. However, the association between ß-blocker initiation before the day of surgery and the risk of stroke is unknown. The authors hypothesized there would be no association between preoperative ß-blocker initiation within 60 days of surgery or chronic ß-blockade (more than 60 days) and the risk of stroke in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Data on elective major abdominal surgery were obtained from the IBM (USA) Truven Health MarketScan 2005 to 2015 Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. Patients were stratified by ß-blocker dispensing exposure: (1) ß-blocker-naïve, (2) preoperative ß-blocker initiation within 60 days of surgery, and (3) chronic ß-blocker dispensing (more than 60 days). The authors compared in-hospital stroke and major adverse cardiac events between the different ß-blocker therapy exposures. RESULTS: There were 204,981 patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. ß-Blocker exposure was as follows: perioperative initiation within 60 days of surgery for 4,026 (2.0%) patients, chronic ß-blocker therapy for 45,424 (22.2%) patients, and ß-blocker-naïve for 155,531 (75.9%) patients. The unadjusted frequency of stroke for patients with ß-blocker initiation (0.4%, 17 of 4,026) and chronic ß-blocker therapy (0.4%, 171 of 45,424) was greater than in ß-blocker-naïve patients (0.2%, 235 of 155,531; P < 0.001). After propensity score weighting, patients initiated on a ß-blocker within 60 days of surgery (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.31 to 2.04; P = 0.757) or on chronic ß-blocker therapy (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.15; P = 0.901) demonstrated similar stroke risk compared to ß-blocker-naïve patients. Patients on chronic ß-blocker therapy demonstrated lower adjusted risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to ß-blocker-naïve patients (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91; P = 0.007), despite higher unadjusted absolute event rate (2.6% [1,173 of 45,424] vs. 0.6% [872 of 155,531]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, the authors observed no association between preoperative ß-blocker initiation within 60 days of surgery or chronic ß-blocker therapy and stroke.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Aldosterone Antagonists Versus Beta-Blockers as Fourth Agents in Patients With Apparent Resistant Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence exists regarding long-term effectiveness and safety of aldosterone antagonists (AAs) versus beta blockers (BBs) as fourth-line antihypertensive agents in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). We evaluated the comparative effectiveness and safety of aldosterone AA versus BB. METHODS: We conducted a real-world retrospective cohort study using IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare Supplemental claims (2007-2019). Patients with RH entered the cohort (ie, index date) when they newly initiated either AA or BB. The effectiveness outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. Safety outcomes were hyperkalemia, gynecomastia, and kidney function deterioration. Potential confounding was addressed by adjustment for baseline characteristics via stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) based on propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards regression with SIPTWs were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% CI comparing risk for outcomes between AA and BB groups. RESULTS: We identified 80 598 patients with RH (mean age: 61 years, 51% males), of which 6626 initiated AA and 73 972 initiated BB as the fourth antihypertensive agent. Among patients with RH, initiation of AA as a fourth-line antihypertensive agent did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular event risk relative to BB initiation (aHR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.50-1.19]) but did substantially increase the risk of hyperkalemia (aHR, 3.86 [95% CI, 2.78-5.34]), gynecomastia (aHR, 9.51 [95% CI, 5.69-15.89]), and kidney function deterioration (aHR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.34-1.99]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term clinical trials powered to assess major adverse cardiovascular events are necessary to understand the risk-benefit trade-off of AA as fourth-line therapy for RH.

Safety assessment of propranolol for infantile hemangioma: a study in an Asian population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of initiating and maintaining propranolol therapy for infantile hemangioma (IH) and the safety of different doses. METHODS: The retrospective analysis included 336 consecutive cases of infants with IH treated between January 2016 and October 2017. The patients were assessed in the hospital at the initiation of the therapy and later in outpatient settings during the therapy. The monitoring included blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), blood glucose, hepatic and renal function, myocardial enzymes and serum lipids. Cardiac examinations in the outpatient follow-up included electrocardiography, ultrasound echocardiography, height, weight and head circumference. RESULTS: Propranolol decreased BP and HR at the initiation of treatment. The incidences of sinus bradycardia and hypoglycemia increased with the time of administration. Mean height, weight and head circumference were not affected during the treatment. The incidence of PR prolongation was 0%-5.7%. The effect of propranolol on the cardiovascular system, metabolism and physical development was not affected by its dose. CONCLUSION: Oral propranolol is a safe treatment for IH. Serious side effects were not observed. Attention should be paid to the side effects during clinical treatment.

Association Between Beta-Blockers and Mortality and Readmission in Older Patients with Heart Failure: an Instrumental Variable Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The demographics of heart failure are changing. The rate of growth of the "older" heart failure population, specifically those ≥ 75, has outpaced that of any other age group. These older patients were underrepresented in the early beta-blocker trials. There are several reasons, including a decreased potential for mortality benefit and increased risk of side effects, why the risk/benefit tradeoff may be different in this population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the association between receipt of a beta-blocker after heart failure discharge and early mortality and readmission rates among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), specifically patients aged 75+. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We used 100% Medicare Parts A and B and a random 40% sample of Part D to create a cohort of beneficiaries with ≥ 1 hospitalization for HFrEF between 2008 and 2016 to run an instrumental variable analysis. MAIN MEASURE: The primary measure was 90-day, all-cause mortality; the secondary measure was 90-day, all-cause readmission. KEY RESULTS: Using the two-stage least squared methodology, among all HFrEF patients, receipt of a beta-blocker within 30-day of discharge was associated with a - 4.35% (95% CI - 6.27 to - 2.42%, p < 0.001) decrease in 90-day mortality and a - 4.66% (95% CI - 7.40 to - 1.91%, p = 0.001) decrease in 90-day readmission rates. Even among patients ≥ 75 years old, receipt of a beta-blocker at discharge was also associated with a significant decrease in 90-day mortality, - 4.78% (95% CI - 7.19 to - 2.40%, p < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions, - 4.67% (95% CI - 7.89 to - 1.45%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients aged ≥ 75 years who receive a beta-blocker after HFrEF hospitalization have significantly lower 90-day mortality and readmission rates. The magnitude of benefit does not appear to wane with age. Absent a strong contraindication, all patients with HFrEF should attempt beta-blocker therapy at/after hospital discharge, regardless of age.

Perioperative Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Review.

Importance: Perioperative cardiovascular complications occur in 3% of hospitalizations for noncardiac surgery in the US. This review summarizes evidence regarding cardiovascular risk assessment prior to noncardiac surgery. Observations: Preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment requires a focused history and physical examination to identify signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and severe valvular disease. Risk calculators, such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, identify individuals with low risk (<1%) and higher risk (≥1%) for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events during the surgical hospital admission or within 30 days of surgery. Cardiovascular testing is rarely indicated in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. Stress testing may be considered in patients at higher risk (determined by the inability to climb ≥2 flights of stairs, which is <4 metabolic equivalent tasks) if the results from the testing would change the perioperative medical, anesthesia, or surgical approaches. Routine coronary revascularization does not reduce perioperative risk and should not be performed without specific indications independent of planned surgery. Routine perioperative use of low-dose aspirin (100 mg/d) does not decrease cardiovascular events but does increase surgical bleeding. Statins are associated with fewer postoperative cardiovascular complications and lower mortality (1.8% vs 2.3% without statin use; P < .001) in observational studies, and should be considered preoperatively in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease undergoing vascular surgery. High-dose ß-blockers (eg, 100 mg of metoprolol succinate) administered 2 to 4 hours prior to surgery are associated with a higher risk of stroke (1.0% vs 0.5% without ß-blocker use; P = .005) and mortality (3.1% vs 2.3% without ß-blocker use; P = .03) and should not be routinely used. There is a greater risk of perioperative myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events in adults aged 75 years or older (9.5% vs 4.8% for younger adults; P < .001) and in patients with coronary stents (8.9% vs 1.5% for those without stents; P < .001) and these patients warrant careful preoperative consideration. Conclusions and Relevance: Comprehensive history, physical examination, and assessment of functional capacity during daily life should be performed prior to noncardiac surgery to assess cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular testing is rarely indicated in patients with a low risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but may be useful in patients with poor functional capacity (<4 metabolic equivalent tasks) undergoing high-risk surgery if test results would change therapy independent of the planned surgery. Perioperative medical therapy should be prescribed based on patient-specific risk.

Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events in Patients on Antidementia Medications.

OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer disease (AD) and treated with antidementia medications. METHODS: Demographics, diagnoses, and medication usage of 30 433 Medicare patients were analyzed using 2006 to 2013 claims data and a combined model of screening, ranking and stepwise logistic regressions to evaluate factors associated with composite outcomes of 6 cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Incidence rate of at least 1 cardiovascular event was 25.1%. Fifty-five factors were identified from the 10 381 candidate variables by the combined model with a c-statistic of 67% and an accuracy of 75%. Factors associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events include history of heart rhythm disorders, alteration of consciousness (odds ratio [OR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.36), and usage of ß-blockers (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.13-1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider the increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with AD with heart rhythm disorders and on ß-blockers.

Opportunities and Challenges of Claims-Based Quality Assessment: The Case of Postdischarge ß-Blocker Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: To combat the high cost and increasing burden of quality reporting, the Medicare Payment Advisory (MedPAC) has recommended using claims data wherever possible to measure clinical quality. In this article, we use a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and existing quality metrics to explore the impact of changes in quality metric methodology on measured quality performance, the association with patient outcomes, and hospital rankings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 100% Medicare Parts A and B and a random 40% sample of Part D from 2008 to 2015 to create (1) a cohort of 295 494 fee-for-service beneficiaries with ≥1 hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and (2) a cohort of 1079 hospitals with ≥11 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction admissions in 2014 and 2015. We used Part D data to calculate ß-blocker use after discharge and ß-blocker use over time. We then varied the quality metric methodologies to explore the impact on measured performance. We then used multivariable time-to-event analyses to explore the impact of metric methodology on the association between quality performance and patient outcomes and Kendall's Tau to describe impact of quality metric methodology on hospital rankings. We found that quality metric methodology had a significant impact on measured quality performance. The association between quality performance and readmissions was sensitive to changes in methodology but the association with 1-year mortality was not. Changes in quality metric methodology also had a substantial impact on hospital quality rankings. CONCLUSIONS: This article highlights how small changes in quality metric methodology can have a significant impact on measured quality performance, the association between quality performance and utilization-based outcomes, and hospital rankings. These findings highlight the need for standardized quality metric methodologies, better case-mix adjustment and cast further doubt on the use of utilization-based outcomes as quality metrics in chronic diseases.

Beta-Blocker Dose Stratifies Mortality Risk in a Racially Diverse Heart Failure Population.

Heart failure (HF) is highly prevalent and a major cause of death in the United States. The effect of HF medications on survival has been predicted by validated models studied in populations predominantly of European descent. This study aimed to identify medications associated with survival in a racially diverse HF population. Patients with HF were recruited and followed from 2001 to 2015. Data were collected from electronic health records and the Social Security Death Index. The primary analysis tested the association between medication dose and all-cause mortality, with a secondary analysis assessing the composite outcome of death or cardiac-related hospitalization. Circulating concentration of the fibrotic marker procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) was also compared with medication doses in patients with concentrations available. The study population consisted of 337 patients, of which 25.2% died and 46% were hospitalized. Increased beta-blocker (BB) dose was significantly associated with survival in the base model [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, P = 0.017] and marginally associated in the comprehensive model (HR = 0.75, P = 0.068). BB dose was also associated with decreased risk of the composite end point in the base model (HR = 0.80, P = 0.029) and to a lesser extent in the comprehensive model (HR = 0.83, P = 0.085). Furthermore, increased BB dose was inversely associated with circulating PIIINP concentration (P = 0.041). In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of BB dose escalation for survival and decreased hospitalization in patients with HF, regardless of race or HF type. It also suggests that benefits observed with high-dose BBs could be mediated, at least in part, by decreased cardiac fibrosis.

Frequency of Utilization of Beta Blockers in Patients With Heart Failure and Depression and Their Effect on Mortality.

Beta blockers reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. Early reports linking ß-blockers with depression may have limited their use in heart failure patients with co-morbid depression. Although more recent studies have challenged the association between ß-blocker therapy and depression, patient and physicians remain concerned. The goal of this study is to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of ß-blocker therapy in heart failure patients with depression. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients at a multicenter integrated healthcare system with a diagnosis of heart failure from 2008 to 2014. Among 6,915 patients with heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of <50%, 1,252 (18.1%) had a diagnosis of depression. Patients with depression were more likely to be women and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Depression was associated with decreased odds of ß-blocker treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.95; p = 0.016). During a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, 439 (35.1%) patients with depression died compared with 1,549 (27.4%) patients without depression. Depressed patients not treated with ß-blocker had higher mortality compared with nondepressed patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.4, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.7, p = 0.005). When treated with ß-blockers, their risk of mortality was attenuated (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.2, p = 0.14). In conclusion, ß-blocker therapy remains underutilized in heart failure patients with depression, and its underutilization contributes to the reduced survival rate observed in this cohort.

Comprehensive Real-World Assessment of Marketed Medications to Guide Parkinson's Drug Discovery.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease is a disorder growing in prevalence, disability, and deaths. Healthcare databases provide a 'real-world' perspective for millions of individuals. We envisioned helping accelerate drug discovery by using these databases. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess the association of marketed medications with the risk of parkinsonism in four US claims databases and to evaluate the consistency of the association of ß-adrenoreceptor modulation with parkinsonism. METHODS: The study was conducted using a self-controlled cohort design in which subjects served as their own control. The time from treatment initiation until discontinuation or end of observation was the exposed period and a similar time preceding medication was the unexposed period. Medications were studied at ingredient and class level. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) and combined IRR were calculated. RESULTS: We assessed 2181 drugs and 117,015,066 people. Diphenhydramine, isradipine, methylphenidate, armodafinil, and modafinil were associated with reduced risk for parkinsonism in at least two databases. Armodafinil, modafinil, methylphenidate, and the ß-agonist albuterol were associated with a 56%, 54%, 39%, and 17% reduction in the risk of having parkinsonism, respectively. Isradipine results were heterogeneous and no significant association was found. Propranolol was associated with a 32% increased risk, the only ß-adrenoceptor antagonist (ß-blocker) associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Armodafinil, modafinil, and methylphenidate were associated with a decreased risk of parkinsonism, as were ß-agonists. Of the ß-blockers, only propranolol was associated with increased risk. Healthcare database analyses that incorporate scientific rigor provide insight and direction for drug discovery efforts. These findings show association not causality; however, they offer considerable support to the association between ß-adrenergic receptor modulation and risk of Parkinson's disease.

Systematic assessment of prescribed medications and short-term risk of myocardial infarction - a pharmacopeia-wide association study from Norway and Sweden.

Wholesale, unbiased assessment of Scandinavian electronic health-care databases offer a unique opportunity to reveal potentially important undiscovered drug side effects. We examined the short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with drugs prescribed in Norway or Sweden. We identified 24,584 and 97,068 AMI patients via the patient- and the cause-of-death registers and linked to prescription databases in Norway (2004-2014) and Sweden (2005-2014), respectively. A case-crossover design was used to compare the drugs dispensed 1-7 days before the date of AMI diagnosis with 15-21 days' time -window for all the drug individually while controlling the receipt of other drugs. A BOLASSO approach was used to select drugs that acutely either increase or decrease the apparent risk of AMI. We found 48 drugs to be associated with AMI in both countries. Some antithrombotics, antibiotics, opioid analgesics, adrenergics, proton-pump inhibitors, nitroglycerin, diazepam, metoclopramide, acetylcysteine were associated with higher risk for AMI; whereas angiotensin-II-antagonists, calcium-channel blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, allopurinol, mometasone, metformin, simvastatin, levothyroxine were inversely associated. The results were generally robust in different sensitivity analyses. This study confirms previous findings for certain drugs. Based on the known effects or indications, some other associations could be anticipated. However, inverse associations of hydroxocobalamin, levothyroxine and mometasone were unexpected and needs further investigation. This pharmacopeia-wide association study demonstrates the feasibility of a systematic, unbiased approach to pharmacological triggers of AMI and other diseases with acute, identifiable onsets.

Safety assessment during initiation and maintenance of propranolol therapy for infantile hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND: Propranolol is an effective method of treatment for infantile hemangiomas (IH). A recent concern is a shift of the therapy into outpatient settings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of initiating and maintaining propranolol therapy for IH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 55 consecutive children with IH being treated with propranolol. The patients were assessed in the hospital at the initiation of the therapy and later in outpatient settings during and after the therapy. Each time, the following monitoring methods were used: physical examination, cardiac ultrasound (ECHO), electrocardiography (ECG), blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and biochemical parameters: blood count, blood glucose, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and ionogram. The therapeutic dose of propranolol was 2.0 mg/kg/day divided into 2 doses. RESULTS: Four children were excluded during the qualification or the initiation of propranolol; a total of 51 patients were subject to the final analysis. All the children presented clinical improvement. There was a significant reduction in the mean HR values only at the initiation of propranolol. There were no changes in HR during the course of the therapy. Blood pressure values were within normal limits. Both systolic and diastolic values decreased in the first 3 months. Bradycardia and hypotension were observed sporadically, and they were asymptomatic. Electrocardiography did not show significant deviations. The pathological findings of the ECHO scans were not a contraindication to continuing the therapy. There were no changes in biochemical parameters. Apart from 1 symptomatic case of hypoglycemia, other low glucose episodes were asymptomatic and sporadic. The observed adverse effects were mild and the propranolol dose had to be adjusted in only 6 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol is effective, safe and well-tolerated by children with IH. The positive results of the safety assessment support the strategy of initiating propranolol in outpatient settings. Future studies are needed to assess the benefits of the therapy in ambulatory conditions.

The Use of ß-Blockers for the Treatment of Periocular Hemangiomas in Infants: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature assessing the efficacy of ß-blockers for the treatment of periocular hemangioma in infants. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in May 2018 in PubMed with no date restrictions and limited to studies published in English and in the Cochrane Library database without any restrictions. The combined searches yielded 437 citations. Of these,16 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: None of the 16 studies included in this assessment were rated level I, 3 were rated level II, and 13 were rated level III. The most common treatment regimen was 2 mg/kg daily oral propranolol, but intralesional and topical ß-blockers were also used. Treatment effect was most often measured in terms of reduction in the size of the lesions, which occurred in the majority of patients. ß-Blockers were consistently shown to reduce astigmatism, but this reduction was shown to be statistically significant in only 2 series. The effect of ß-blockers on amblyopia was not adequately documented. ß-Blockers were generally well tolerated and had mild side effects (fatigue, gastrointestinal upset/diarrhea, restlessness/sleep disturbances, minor wheezing, and cold extremities). Complications severe enough to require cessation of treatment occurred in only 2 patients out of a total of 229 who received ß-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to support the safety and efficacy of both topical and systemic ß-blockers to promote regression of periocular hemangiomas. Additional research may confirm the best dosage and route of administration to maximize efficacy in reducing induced astigmatism and amblyopia associated with periocular hemangiomas while minimizing side effects.

Patient-Important Adverse Events of ß-blockers in Frail Older Adults after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the burden of adverse events caused by ß-blocker use after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in frail, older nursing home (NH) residents. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used national Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set assessments. The study population was individuals aged ≥65 years who resided in a U.S. NH for ≥30 days, had a hospitalized AMI between May 2007 and March 2010, and returned to the NH. Exposure was new use of ß-blockers versus nonuse post-AMI. Orthostasis, general hypotension, falls, dizziness, syncope, and breathlessness outcomes were measured over 90 days of follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models after 1:1 propensity score-matching of ß-blocker users to nonusers. RESULTS: Among the 10,992 NH propensity score-matched residents with an AMI, the mean age was 84 years and 70.9% were female. ß-blocker users were more likely than nonusers to be hospitalized for hypotension (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39) or experience breathlessness (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20) after AMI. With the exception of falls, other outcome estimates, though imprecise, were compatible with a potential elevated risk of orthostasis (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.96-1.35), syncope, (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.55-2.77), and dizziness (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.82-1.99) among ß-blocker users. CONCLUSIONS: Considered alongside prior evidence that ß-blockers may worsen functional outcomes in NH residents with poor baseline functional and cognitive status, our results suggest that providers should exercise caution when prescribing for these vulnerable groups, balancing the mortality benefit against the potential for causing adverse events.

ß-Blocker Use in Pregnancy and the Risk for Congenital Malformations: An International Cohort Study.

Background: ß-Blockers are a class of antihypertensive medications that are commonly used in pregnancy. Objective: To estimate the risks for major congenital malformations associated with first-trimester exposure to ß-blockers. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Health registries in the 5 Nordic countries and the U.S. Medicaid database. Patients: Pregnant women with a diagnosis of hypertension and their offspring. Measurements: First-trimester exposure to ß-blockers was assessed. Outcomes were any major congenital malformation, cardiac malformations, cleft lip or palate, and central nervous system (CNS) malformations. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders. Results: Of 3577 women with hypertensive pregnancies in the Nordic cohort and 14 900 in the U.S. cohort, 682 (19.1%) and 1668 (11.2%), respectively, were exposed to ß-blockers in the first trimester. The pooled adjusted relative risk (RR) and risk difference per 1000 persons exposed (RD1000) associated with ß-blockers were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.30) and 3.0 (CI, -6.6 to 12.6), respectively, for any major malformation; 1.12 (CI, 0.83 to 1.51) and 2.1 (CI, -4.3 to 8.4) for any cardiac malformation; and 1.97 (CI, 0.74 to 5.25) and 1.0 (CI, -0.9 to 3.0) for cleft lip or palate. For CNS malformations, the adjusted RR was 1.37 (CI, 0.58 to 3.25) and the RD1000 was 1.0 (CI, -2.0 to 4.0) (based on U.S. cohort data only). Limitation: Analysis was restricted to live births, exposure was based on dispensed medication, and cleft lip or palate and CNS malformations had few outcomes. Conclusion: The results suggest that maternal use of ß-blockers in the first trimester is not associated with a large increase in the risk for overall malformations or cardiac malformations, independent of measured confounders. Primary Funding Source: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Söderström König Foundation.

Assessment of clinical effect and treatment quality of immediate-release carvedilol-IR versus SLOW release carvedilol-SR in Heart Failure patients (SLOW-HF): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol is a non-selective, third-generation beta-blocker and is one of the cornerstones for treatment for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, due to its short half-life, immediate-release carvedilol (IR) needs to be prescribed twice a day. Recently, slow-release carvedilol (SR) has been developed. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether carvedilol-SR is non-inferior to standard carvedilol-IR in terms of its clinical efficacy in patients with HFrEF. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with stable HFrEF will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the carvedilol-SR group (160 patients) and the carvedilol-IR group (160 patients). Patients aged ≥ 20 years, with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%, N-terminal pro B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥ 125 pg/ml or BNP ≥ 35 pg/ml, who are clinically stable and have no evidence of congestion or volume retention, will be eligible. After randomization, patients will be followed up for 6 months. The primary endpoint is the change in NT-proBNP level from baseline to the study end. The secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients with NT-proBNP increment > 10% from baseline, composite of all-cause mortality and readmission, mortality rate, readmission rate, changes in blood pressure, quality of life, and drug compliance. DISCUSSIONS: The SLOW-HF trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase-IV, multicenter study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of carvedilol-SR compared to carvedilol-IR in HFrEF patients. If carvedilol-SR proves to be non-inferior to carvedilol-IR, a once-daily prescription of carvedilol may be recommended for patients with HFrEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03209180 . Registered on 6 July 2017.

Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus on ß-Blockers.

Although the use of ß-blockers may help in achieving maximum effects of intensive glycemic control because of a decrease in the adverse effects after severe hypoglycemia, they pose a potential risk for the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of ß-blockers is effective in patients with diabetes mellitus and whether its use is associated with the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia. Using the ACCORD trial (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) data, we performed Cox proportional hazards analyses with a propensity score adjustment. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a cardiovascular event during the study period, which included nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death. The mean follow-up periods (±SD) were 4.6±1.6 years in patients on ß-blockers (n=2527) and 4.7±1.6 years in those not on ß-blockers (n=2527). The cardiovascular event rate was significantly higher in patients on ß-blockers than in those not on ß-blockers (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.72; P<0.001). In patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure, the cumulative event rate for cardiovascular events was also significantly higher in those on ß-blockers than in those not on ß-blockers (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.60; P=0.03). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in patients on ß-blockers than in those not on ß-blockers (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.64; P=0.02). In conclusion, the use of ß-blockers in patients with diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events.

Assessment of the effectiveness of topical propranolol 4% gel for infantile hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors in children. Because of their benign character and natural involution, the vast majority of IHs do not require any treatment. In the past few years, topical beta blockers have been reported to be an effective treatment of superficial IHs. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of topical propranolol 4% gel for the treatment of IHs. METHODS: A retrospective study of all cases of IHs treated with topical propranolol 4% gel between 2013 and 2015 was performed. All patients were evaluated in a pediatric dermatology unit of a tertiary medical center. Epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment data, including effectiveness score and safety, were reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 63 patients with a total of 75 IHs. Of the total number of IHs, 43 (57.3%) showed a good response to treatment, 19 (25.3%) a partial response, and 13 (17.33%) poor or no response, thus 62 (82.6%) had good or partial response to treatment. Age at treatment initiation, treatment time, thickness of the superficial component, and size of the lesions were shown to predict response to therapy. Out of the entire examined group, only two patients reported minor local side effects manifested by irritation, redness, and scaling of the treated area. No systemic adverse effects were reported. LIMITATIONS: This is an uncontrolled retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Propranolol 4% gel is a safe and efficient topical therapy for IH.