Relationship between anticholinergic load and self-perceived health in a population aged 44 years or older / Relação entre carga anticolinérgica e autopercepção de saúde em população com mais de 44 anos

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between anticholinergic load (ACL) and self-perceived general health in adults in a medium-sized municipality in southern Brazil. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on 2015 data from a medium-sized municipality in southern Brazil. All respondents aged 44 years or older who reported using drugs in the 2 weeks before the interview were included (n = 662). The Anticholinergic Drug Scale was used to measure the ACL. Self-perceived health was categorized as positive self-perception (PSP) or negative self-perception (NSP). Crude and adjusted Poisson regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between ACL and self-perceived health. RESULTS: NSP was found in 50.91% of 662 respondents. Significant ACL, older age, lower economic status, lower education, polypharmacy, and depression correlated with a higher frequency of NSP. Individuals with significant ACL had a prevalence of NSP of 1.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.02 ­ 1.58), and each additional ACL level represented a 6.10% higher chance of worse self-perceived health, regardless of confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: An association was found between significant ACL and NSP, with an effect dependent on ACL level

OBJETIVO: Investigar a relação entre carga anticolinérgica (CAC) e autopercepção de saúde em adultos de um município de médio porte do sul do Brasil. METODOLOGIA: Trata-se de um estudo transversal com dados de 2015, realizado em um município de médio porte do sul do Brasil. Todos os entrevistados com 44 anos ou mais que relataram uso de drogas nas duas semanas anteriores à entrevista foram incluídos (n = 662). A Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) foi utilizada para medir a CAC. A autopercepção da saúde foi categorizada em autopercepção positiva (APP) ou autopercepção negativa (APN). Análises de regressão de Poisson bruta e ajustada foram realizadas para investigar a associação entre CAC e autopercepção de saúde. RESULTADOS: Entre os 662 participantes, a CAC foi encontrada em 50,91% dos respondentes. CAC significativa, idade avançada, situação econômica mais baixa, menor escolaridade, polifarmácia e depressão foram correlacionados com maior frequência de APN. Indivíduos com CAC significativo apresentaram prevalência de APN de 1,27 (intervalo de confiança de 95%: 1,02 ­ 1,58), e cada nível adicional de CAC representou uma chance 6,10% maior de pior autopercepção de saúde, independentemente de fatores de confusão. CONCLUSÕES: Encontrou-se associação entre ACL significativo e APN, com efeito dependente do valor do CAC

Assessment and comparison of anticholinergic exposure in older adults at a Basic Health Unit in Porto Alegre / Avaliação e comparação da exposição anticolinérgica em idosos de uma Unidade Básica de Saúde de Porto Alegre

Objectives: To estimate the anticholinergic burden in geriatric patients using two scales and to assess the degree of agreement between them. Methods: Data from an observational study conducted in a primary health care service were used. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Belgian Scale Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale and the Brazilian Scale of Medicines with Anticholinergic Activity. The cumulative anticholinergic burden score was classified using a categorical approach: Brazilian scale (0: none; 1 ­ 2: low; ≥ 3: high) and Belgian scale (0: none; 0.5 ­ 1.5: low; ≥ 2: high). The degree of agreement between the two instruments was obtained through Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: A total of 374 older people were included, most of them female and aged between 60 and 69 years. At least one potentially inappropriate drug with anticholinergic activity was used by 60.70% of patients according to the Brazilian scale and 32.89% by the Belgian scale. On average, 20.85% were under high anticholinergic exposure. Overall, on both scales, the most commonly recurrent medications were those indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Agreement between the scales was moderate (Kappa = 0.43). Conclusions: A high percentage of older adults was exposed to drugs with an anticholinergic burden, posing risks to health and quality of life. Consensus is needed on how anticholinergic burden is calculated by these scores, as well as standardization of the list of included drugs.

Objetivos: Estimar a carga anticolinérgica em idosos com base em duas escalas e avaliar o grau de concordância entre estas. Metodologia: Foram utilizados dados de um estudo observacional realizado em um serviço de atenção primária. A carga anticolinérgica foi avaliada pela escala belga Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale e da Escala Brasileira de Medicamentos com Atividade Anticolinérgica. A pontuação da carga anticolinérgica cumulativa foi classificada utilizando uma abordagem categórica: escala brasileira (0: nenhuma, 1 ­ 2: baixa, ≥ 3: alta) e escala belga (0: nenhuma, 0,5 ­ 1,5: baixa, ≥ 2: alta). O grau de concordância entre as duas ferramentas foi obtido por meio do coeficiente Capa de Cohen. Resultados: Foram incluídos 374 idosos, a maioria do sexo feminino e com idade entre 60 a 69 anos. O uso de pelo menos um medicamento potencialmente inapropriado com atividade anticolinérgica foi verificado em 60,70% dos idosos com a aplicação da escala brasileira e em 32,89% com a escala belga. Em média, 20.85% estavam sob alta exposição anticolinérgica. De modo geral, os medicamentos mais recorrentes, para ambas as escalas, foram os indicados para o tratamento de transtornos psiquiátricos. A concordância entre as escalas foi moderada (Capa = 0,43). Conclusão: Um percentual elevado de idosos estava exposto a medicamentos com carga anticolinérgica, representando riscos para a saúde e a qualidade de vida. É necessário um consenso sobre como calcular a carga anticolinérgica nos diferentes escores, bem como a padronização da lista de medicamentos incluídos.

Prevalence of anticholinergic burden and risk factors amongst the older population: analysis of insurance claims data of Korean patients.

Background Despite growing interest in the negative clinical outcomes of multiple anticholinergic use, limited studies have evaluated anticholinergic burden in the geriatric population nationally. Objective To evaluate the prevalence of high anticholinergic burden using the newly developed Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale in comparison with previous tools and to identify associated factors. Setting National insurance data from a cross section (20%) of older Koreans (2016). Methods Anticholinergic burden was measured using the Korean scale in comparison to the Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden, and Anticholinergic Risk Scale. High anticholinergic burden was defined as a summed score of ≥ 3 for concurrent medications or a dose-standardized average daily score of ≥ 3, using each anticholinergic scale. Main outcomes measured Prevalence and predictors of high anticholinergic burden. Results Data of 1,292,323 patients were analyzed. According to the Korean scale, the prevalence of high anticholinergic burden was 25.5%. This result was similar to that from the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (24.9%) and Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (22.2%). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of anticholinergic burden include: age, gender (female), high Charlson comorbidity index score, polypharmacy, medical aid beneficiary, co-morbidities (such as schizophrenia, depression, urinary incontinence, and Parkinson's disease), frequent healthcare visits, various healthcare facilities utilized, and predominantly visiting hospital-level facilities. According to the Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale, the major drugs contributing to the anticholinergic burden were ranitidine, chlorpheniramine, tramadol, and dimenhydrinate. Conclusion This study showed that 1 in 4 older Koreans are exposed to high anticholinergic burden. The predictors identified in this research might assist pharmacists in early interventions for their patients.

A Modified Delphi Consensus Study of the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia.

OBJECTIVE: A nominal group process followed by a modified Delphi method was used to survey expert opinions on best practices for tardive dyskinesia (TD) screening, diagnosis, and treatment and to identify areas lacking in clinical evidence. PARTICIPANTS: A steering committee of 11 TD experts met in nominal group format to prioritize questions to be addressed and identify core bibliographic materials and criteria for survey panelists. Of 60 invited experts, 29 (23 psychiatrists and 6 neurologists) agreed to participate. EVIDENCE: A targeted literature search of PubMed (search term: tardive dyskinesia) and recommendations of the steering committee were used to generate core bibliographic material. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) review articles, meta-analyses, guidelines, or clinical trials; (2) publication in English between 2007 and 2017; (3) > 3 pages in length; and (4) publication in key clinical journals with impact factors ≥ 2.0. Of 29 references that met these criteria, 18 achieved a score ≥ 5 (calculated as the number of steering committee votes multiplied by journal impact factor and number of citations divided by years since publication) and were included. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Two survey rounds were conducted anonymously through electronic media from November 2017 to January 2018; responses were collected, collated, and analyzed. Respondent agreement was defined a priori as unanimous (100%), consensus (75%-99%), or majority (50%-74%). For questions using a 5-point Likert scale, agreement was based on percentage of respondents choosing ≥ 4 ("agree completely" or "agree"). Round 1 survey included questions on TD screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Round 2 questions were refined per panelist feedback and excluded Round 1 questions with < 25% agreement and > 75% agreement (unless feedback suggested further investigation). CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached that (1) a brief, clinical assessment for TD should be performed at every clinical encounter in patients taking antipsychotics; (2) even mild movements in 1 body area may represent possible TD; (3) management requires an overall evaluation of treatment, including reassessment of antipsychotics and anticholinergics as well as consideration of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors; and (4) informed discussions with patients/caregivers are essential.

The Relationship Between Anticholinergic Exposure and Falls, Fractures, and Mortality in Patients with Overactive Bladder.

BACKGROUND: Understanding risk factors associated with falls is important for optimizing care and quality of life for older patients. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the relationship between anticholinergic exposure and falls, fractures, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative claims data from 1 January 2007 to 30 September 2015. Individuals aged 65-89 years newly diagnosed or treated for overactive bladder (OAB) were identified. Index date was the first OAB diagnosis or OAB medication prescription claim. Follow-up began on the index date and continued until death, disenrollment, or end of study period. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale was used to define and quantify daily anticholinergic exposure and intensity. The primary study outcome was a combined endpoint of falls or fractures. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: There were 113,311 patients with mean age of 74.8 ± standard deviation (SD) 6.2 years included. Current anticholinergic exposure was associated with a 1.28-fold increased hazard of a fall/fracture (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.32) compared with unexposed person-time, and past exposure was associated with a 1.14-fold increased hazard of a fall/fracture (95% CI 1.12-1.17). Compared with unexposed person-time, low-, moderate-, and high-intensity anticholinergic exposure was associated with a 1.04-fold (95% CI 1.00-1.07), 1.13-fold (95% CI 1.09-1.17), and 1.31-fold (95% CI 1.26-1.36) increased hazard of falls/fractures, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic exposure is associated with an increased risk of falls or fractures in older patients and is an important consideration when evaluating treatment options for such patients with OAB.

Association between Anticholinergic Medication Use and Risk of Dementia among Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between anticholinergic medication use, categorized by anticholinergic cognitive burden (primary objective) and cumulative dose (secondary objective), and the risk of developing dementia among patients with Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with an active comparator design. DATA SOURCE: National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan (2001-2011). PATIENTS: A total of 1232 adults with Parkinson's disease who were diagnosed between 2002 and 2004 and taking at least one antiparkinson medication during this period were included. Of these patients, 694 were exposed to anticholinergic medications categorized as mild (reference group), and 538 were exposed to anticholinergic medications categorized as moderate or severe (exposure group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Exposure to different types of anticholinergic medications was categorized by using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale, and cumulative doses of anticholinergic medications were measured by using the cumulative minimum doses (cMD) method. Associations between anticholinergic medication use and risk of dementia were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The type of anticholinergics used (moderate or severe vs mild ACB) was not significantly associated with an increased risk of developing dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.27). After adjusting for confounders, a high cumulative dose of anticholinergic drug (> 1095 cumulative minimum doses [cMDs]) was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of developing dementia when compared with a low cumulative dose of anticholinergic drug (≤ 90 cMDs) (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.35-6.97). CONCLUSION: Among patients with Parkinson's disease in Taiwan, those with a high cumulative dose of anticholinergics had an increased risk of being diagnosed with dementia. Physicians should consider prescribing the lowest therapeutic dose of anticholinergic medication when making treatment decisions for patients with Parkinson's disease.

Tiotropium in asthma: From bench to bedside.

OBJECTIVE: Tiotropium is a long-acting muscarinic antagonist approved for maintenance treatment of asthma in children, adolescents, and adults in the United States, and recommended as add-on treatment for uncontrolled asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and/or long-acting beta-2 agonists. This review traces the journey of tiotropium from its historical origins through early preclinical testing to human clinical trials and real-life studies. DATA SOURCES: A search was performed in PubMed using search terms 'tiotropium' and 'asthma.' Relevant references cited in those articles were reviewed. STUDY SELECTIONS: English language articles published from December 2008-December 2018 were screened. Articles evaluating the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, real-life evidence, and steroid-sparing effect of tiotropium with inadequately controlled asthma were included. RESULTS: Anticholinergics have a long history of use in the treatment of obstructive airway diseases. Evidence indicates that tiotropium's mechanism of action consists of bronchodilation and diminished mucus secretion, with preclinical evidence suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect as well. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials have demonstrated that tiotropium is efficacious and safe, resulting in significant improvements in lung function in adults, adolescents, and children across asthma severities. Emerging evidence suggests that add-on tiotropium might potentially enable reductions in inhaled corticosteroid dose in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Further, tiotropium is a cost-effective treatment option that is also effective in the clinical practice setting. CONCLUSIONS: An increasing body of evidence indicates that tiotropium can play a significant role in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled asthma.

Association between cumulative anticholinergic burden and falls and fractures in patients with overactive bladder: US-based retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between cumulative anticholinergic burden and falls and fractures in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). DESIGN: A retrospective claims-based study (2007-2015) of patients with OAB; outcomes from a subset were contrasted to a non-OAB comparison. SETTING: United States, commercially and Medicare-insured population. PARTICIPANTS: 154 432 adults with OAB and 86 966 adults without OAB, mean age of 56 years, and 67.9% women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative anticholinergic burden, a unitless value representing exposure over time, was estimated over the 12 months pre-index ('at baseline') and every 6 months post index. Burden was categorised as no burden (0), low burden (1-89), medium burden (90-499) or high burden (500+). Unadjusted rates of falls or fractures were estimated, and the increased risk associated with anticholinergic burden (measured at the closest 6-month interval prior to a fall or fracture) was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model and a marginal structural model. RESULTS: Median (IQR) baseline anticholinergic burden was 30 (0.0-314.0) and higher among older (≥65 years, 183 [3.0-713.0]) versus younger (<65 years, 13 [0.0-200.0]) adults. The unadjusted rate of falls or fractures over the period was 5.0 per 100 patient-years, ranging from 3.1 (95% CI 3.0-3.2) for those with no burden, to 7.4 (95% CI 7.1-7.6) for those with high burden at baseline. The adjusted risk of falls and fractures was greater with higher anticholinergic burden in the previous 6 months, with an HR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.3) for low burden versus no burden, to 1.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.4) for high versus no burden. Estimates from marginal structural models adjusting for time-varying covariates were lower but remained significantly higher with a higher anticholinergic burden. Rates of falls and fractures were approximately 40% higher among those with OAB (vs those without). CONCLUSION: Higher levels of anticholinergic burden are associated with higher rates of falls and fractures, highlighting the importance of considering anticholinergic burden when treating patients with OAB.

Psychoactive Medications and Adverse Outcomes among Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend avoidance of several psychoactive medications such as hypnotics in older adults due to their adverse effects. Older patients on hemodialysis may be particularly vulnerable to complications related to use of these agents, but only limited data are available about the risks in this population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the use of psychoactive medications and time to first emergency department visit or hospitalization for altered mental status, fall, and fracture among older patients receiving hemodialysis. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: National registry of patients receiving hemodialysis (US Renal Data System). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 60 007 adults 65 years or older receiving hemodialysis with Medicare Part D coverage in 2011. MEASUREMENTS: The predictors were use of sedative-hypnotics and anticholinergic antidepressants (modeled as separate time-varying exposures). The outcomes were time to first emergency department visit or hospitalization for altered mental status, fall, and fracture (modeled separately). RESULTS: Overall, 17% and 6% used sedative-hypnotics and anticholinergic antidepressants, respectively, in 2011. In multivariable-adjusted Cox regression, anticholinergic antidepressant use was associated with a 25%, 27%, and 39% higher hazard of altered mental status, fall, and fracture, respectively, compared with no use. Use of sedative-hypnotics was not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic antidepressants were associated with adverse outcomes in older hemodialysis patients, and alternative treatments should be considered. Sedative-hypnotics were not associated with the risks evaluated in this study, but further investigation of the harms of this class of agents is warranted before their recommendation as a treatment option for insomnia in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:449-454, 2019.

[Treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

In 2012, The Danish Society of Respiratory Medicine gave birth to their most recent guideline regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Much has happened since, and in late 2017 an update has been published. Chapters have been deleted, and new ones added. The major alteration has been in the section concerning treatment with inhalation medication - now aiming at an easy stepwise up-titration of long-acting medicine as well as a guide of how to down-titrate inhaled corticosteroids. This review mainly focuses on how to treat stable COPD according to The Danish Society of Respiratory Medicine.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of Onabotulinumtoxin A as first-line treatment for overactive bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To determine if Onabotulinumtoxin A (Botox®) should be offered as a first-line therapy for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), even before prescribing anticholinergics. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis modeling the following clinical options: no treatment, non-selective anticholinergics, selective anticholinergics, and Botox®. The model timeframe was 2 years to allow Botox® reinjection and discontinuation of anticholinergics. Multiple efficacy levels included response improvement by < 50%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. Botox® reinjection was allowed at 6 months if < 50% efficacy. Botox® complications and anticholinergic side effects were noted. We modeled up to one medication switch. No crossover from Botox® to anticholinergics or vice versa was allowed, and failures remained with refractory untreated overactive bladder. Medical literature data were used for model parameter values. Costs are 2016 $US. RESULTS: Botox® costs more than non-selective anticholinergics and less than selective anticholinergics in models with and without refractory overactive bladder costs. Botox® had the highest effectiveness (1.763 quality-adjusted life years). Using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, Botox® was found to be cost-effective in models with and without refractory costs ($12,428.75 and $14,437.01, respectively). In both models, Botox® cost less and was more effective than selective anticholinergics, which were "dominated." Over 2 years, subjects averaged 15.6 and 14.3 months on selective and non-selective anticholinergics, respectively, and patients averaged 2.2 Botox® injections. Model results were unchanged with variation of input parameter estimates in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Botox® is a cost-effective therapy for overactive bladder and should be further explored as a first-line option in the treatment paradigm.

Reduction of the Anticholinergic Burden Makes It Possible to Decrease Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a reduction of the anticholinergic burden (AB) on the frequency and severity of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and their repercussions on the care team (occupational disruptiveness). METHODS: In this prospective, single-center study in an acute care unit for Alzheimer disease (AD) and related disorders, 125 elderly subjects (mean age: 84.4 years) with dementia presented with BPSD. The reduction of the AB was evaluated by the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale. BPSD were evaluated with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH). The effect of the reduction of the AB on the BPSD was studied using logistic regression adjusting for the variables of the comprehensive geriatric assessment. RESULTS: Seventy-one subjects (56.8%) presenting with probable AD, 32 (25.6%) mixed dementia (AD and vascular), 17 (13.6%) vascular dementia, and 5 (4.0%) Lewy body dementia were included. Reducing the AB by at least 20% enabled a significant decrease in the frequency × severity scores of the NPI-NH (adjusted odds ratio: 3.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-7.9) and of the occupational disruptiveness score (adjusted odds ratio: 9.9; 95% confidence interval: 3.6-27.3). CONCLUSION: AB reduction in elderly subjects with dementia makes is possible to reduce BPSD and caregiver burden. Recourse to treatments involving an AB must be avoided as much as possible in these patients, and preferential use of nonpharmacologic treatment management plans is encouraged.

Anticholinergic Prescribing in Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Residing in Nursing Homes: Results from a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Medicare Data.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing of medications with anticholinergic properties in older nursing home residents is relatively common, despite an association with an increased risk for falls, delirium, and other outcomes. Few studies have investigated what factors influence different levels of prescribing of these agents. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to identify factors associated with low- and high-level anticholinergic burden in nursing home residents. A secondary objective was to examine in detail the contribution of different medications to low versus high burden to aid in determining which drugs to target in interventions. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of a national sample of 2009-2010 Medicare Part A and B claims, Part D prescription drug events, and Minimum Data Set (MDS) v2.0 assessments. The cohort included 4730 Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D enrollment, admitted for non-skilled stays of ≥ 14 days between 1 January 2010 and 30 September 2010. Anticholinergic burden was defined using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale. Medication scores were summed at the patient level and categorized as high (score ≥ 3), low (score 1-2), or none. Baseline predisposing factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity), enabling factors (prior year hospitalization, emergency department, primary care, specialist visits; region; Medicaid/low-income subsidy), and medical need factors (dementia severity, anti-dementia medication, Charlson co-morbidity index [CCI], select comorbidities) were evaluated for association with anticholinergic burden using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 29.6% of subjects had a high anticholinergic burden and 35.2% had a low burden. High burden was most often (72%) due to one highly anticholinergic medication rather than a cumulative effect. In adjusted analyses, factors associated with increased risk of both low and high anticholinergic burden included comorbidity, antidementia medication, depression, hypertension, and prior year hospitalization. Older age was associated with decreased odds of high anticholinergic burden. Urinary incontinence and prior year specialist visit were associated with increased odds of high anticholinergic burden. Severe and nonsevere dementia were associated with decreased odds of low burden but increased odds of high burden. CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of nursing home patients have some degree of anticholinergic burden. Several medical need variables are significantly associated with increased risk for low and high anticholinergic burden. Interventions should be developed to optimize prescribing for residents at increased risk of receiving medications with anticholinergic properties. Future study is needed to evaluate the difference in the risk of adverse outcomes associated with various levels of anticholinergic burden.

Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta-analysis (NMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Information sources were searched for blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of ≥2 weeks duration, comparing any dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, eligible oral/transdermal anticholinergics, or mirabegron, with each other or placebo, in adults with OAB. Bayesian random-effects models were used to synthesise the results at week 12: NMA for responder analyses and network meta-regression (NMR) for change from baseline analyses. The NMR was used to adjust for differences in baseline severity between studies. Sensitivity analysis, excluding studies considered to be at a high risk of methodological bias, was conducted. RESULTS: In all, 56 RCTs were included in the networks. For each outcome, results are reported for all licensed treatment doses. For each NMR, results are based on patients with an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. After 12 weeks, all treatments were more efficacious than placebo. Patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA (100 U) had, on average, the greatest reductions in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE), urgency episodes, and micturition frequency, and the highest odds of achieving decreases of 100% and ≥50% from baseline in UIE/day. When comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with other pharmacotherapies, mean differences favoured onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U over all comparators for UIE and urgency episodes (credible intervals excluded zero) and all but two of the comparators for micturition frequency. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was also associated with higher odds of achieving a 100% and ≥50% decrease in UIE/day than most other licensed treatments in the network. The exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias had little impact on the conclusions. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that, after 12 weeks, onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U provides greater relief of OAB symptoms compared with most other licensed doses of other pharmacotherapies in the network.

Optimizing medication appropriateness in older adults: a randomized clinical interventional trial to decrease anticholinergic burden.

BACKGROUND: The complexity of medication therapy in older adults with multiple comorbidities often leads to inappropriate prescribing. Drugs with anticholinergic properties are of particular interest because many are not recognized for this property; their use may lead to increased anticholinergic burden resulting in significant health risks, as well as negatively impacting cognition. Medication therapy management (MTM) interventions showed promise in addressing inappropriate medication use, but the effectiveness of targeted multidisciplinary team interventions addressing anticholinergic medications in older populations is yet to be determined. METHODS: We conducted an 8-week, parallel-arm, randomized trial to evaluate whether a targeted patient-centered pharmacist-physician team MTM intervention ("targeted MTM intervention") reduced the use of inappropriate anticholinergic medications in older patients enrolled in a longitudinal cohort at University of Kentucky's Alzheimer's Disease Center. Study outcomes included changes in the medication appropriateness index (MAI) targeting anticholinergic medications and in the anticholinergic drug scale (ADS) score from baseline to the end of study. RESULTS: Between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015 we enrolled and randomized 50 participants taking at least one medication with anticholinergic properties. Of these, 35 (70%) were women, 45 (90%) were white, and 33 (66%) were cognitively intact (clinical dementia rating [CDR] = 0); mean age was 77.7 ± 6.6 years. At baseline, the mean MAI was 12.6 ± 6.3; 25 (50%) of the participants used two or more anticholinergics, and the mean ADS score was 2.8 ± 1.6. After randomization, although no statistically significant difference was noted between groups, we identified a potentially meaningful imbalance as the intervention group had more participants with intact cognition, and thus included CDR in all of the analyses. The targeted MTM intervention resulted in statistically significant CDR adjusted differences between groups with regard to improved MAI (change score of 3.6 (1.1) for the MTM group as compared with 1.0 (0.9) for the control group, p = 0.04) and ADS (change score of 1.0 (0.3) for the MTM group as compared with 0.2 (0.3) for the control group, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our targeted MTM intervention resulted in improvement in anticholinergic medication appropriateness and reduced the use of inappropriate anticholinergic medications in older patients. Our results show promise in an area of great importance to ensure optimum outcomes for medications used in older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02172612 . Registered 20 June 2014.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anticholinergics Versus Botox for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Results From the Anticholinergic Versus Botox Comparison Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of Botox and anticholinergic (AC) medications for the management of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). METHODS: Cost and effectiveness data were analyzed from participants in the Anticholinergic versus Botox Comparison randomized trial of daily AC medication versus 100 U of intradetrusor Botox injection. Societal costs included the following: treatment costs, patient costs, and medical and nonmedical utilization during the 6-month trial. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on questionnaire-derived utility measures and annualized based on data collected at baseline through 6 months. We also estimated the average direct costs for each treatment through 9 months - the duration of time when approximately half the Botox participants maintained adequate symptom control. RESULTS: Data were analyzed on the 231 women who completed a 6-month follow-up in the Anticholinergic versus Botox Comparison trial (119 AC and 112 Botox). The mean reduction in UUI episodes per day was not significantly different per group. The cumulative mean direct costs through the first 6 months also were similar: $1339 for the AC group and $1266 for the Botox group with AC costs exceeding Botox costs after 5 months. Both groups had considerable QALY gains. Annualizing the 6-month trial results to a 12-month measure, the AC and Botox groups averaged 0.702 and 0.707 QALYs, respectively. Estimates through 9 months favored Botox, showing that AC participants incurred a higher cost per month of adequate symptoms control ($305) compared with Botox participants ($207). CONCLUSIONS: Botox and AC medications have similar costs and effectiveness in the first 6 months of UUI treatment. If costs and outcomes are considered through 9 months, Botox may have significantly lower costs but similar UUI symptom control as AC.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-led pilot service based on the anticholinergic risk scale.

OBJECTIVES: To determine primary care physician (PCP) acceptance rates of electronic medication therapy recommendations based on anticholinergic burden for high-risk elderly patients, and to evaluate potential associations between recommendation acceptance and patient-provider characteristics. SETTING: Two medical clinics within Dean Health System, an integrated health care organization comprising ambulatory surgery centers, medical clinics, community pharmacies, specialty pharmacies, a health plan, and a pharmacy benefits management company. PRACTICE INNOVATION: In this pilot service, the medical records of patients at least 60 years old who met the following criteria were evaluated bimonthly: 1) PCP visit within 2 weeks; (2) three or more inpatient hospitalizations or emergency department visits in the past year; and (3) ten or more active medications. Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) scores of eligible patients were calculated, and medication therapy recommendations were sent electronically to PCPs for patients with an ARS score greater than 3. Post-visit recommendation outcomes were recorded. EVALUATION: Descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize patients, physicians, and recommendations. A generalized linear mixed effects model with physician specific random effects was employed to evaluate recommendation acceptance rates, and odds ratios were calculated to quantify associations between baseline patient/provider characteristics and the likelihood of recommendation acceptance. Changes in aggregate ARS scores were evaluated with the use of a paired t test. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in this pilot, with 89 medication therapy recommendations made to 21 PCPs. An overall recommendation acceptance rate of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37%-63%) was observed. There were no significant associations identified between baseline patient/provider characteristics and medication recommendation acceptance. CONCLUSION: High recommendation acceptance rates were achieved with the combination of objective anticholinergic risk assessment and algorithm-driven medication therapy recommendations. The lack of identified associations between patient/provider characteristics and recommendation acceptance supports the future scalability of this novel service.

Relevance of dosage in adherence to treatment with long-acting anticholinergics in patients with COPD.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the degree of adherence for two standard regimens for administrating anticholinergic drugs (12 and 24 hours) in patients with chronic obstruction of the airflow and to establish whether the use of a once-daily dose improves the level of treatment adherence. METHODS: We used long-acting anticholinergics (LAMAs) as a study variable, and included the entire health area of Castile-La Mancha, numbering 2,100,998 inhabitants, as the study population. We analyzed a total of 16,446 patients who had been prescribed a LAMA between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The follow-up period, based on a centralized system of electronic prescription management, was extended until December 2014. RESULTS: During 2013, the medication collected was 7.4%-10.7% higher than indicated by labeling. This was very similar for all LAMAs, irrespective of the patient's sex, the molecule, the device, and the drug dosage. We did not observe seasonal variations in the consumption of LAMAs, nor did we detect differences between prescription drugs for once-daily (every 24 hours) versus twice-daily (every 12 hours) administration, between the different molecules, or between different types of inhalers for the same molecule. The results were similar in 2014. CONCLUSION: The principal conclusion of this study is that, in an area with a centralized management system of pharmacological prescriptions, adherence to treatment with LAMAs is very high, irrespective of the molecules or inhalation device. We did not find that patients who used twice-daily medication had a lower adherence.

Prevalence of Anticholinergic Medication Use in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective chart review. SETTING: The Basics at Jan Werner PACE, Amarillo, Texas. PARTICIPANTS: PACE participants (n = 128) and long-term care residents (n = 105) 65 years of age and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was percentage of prescribed medications with anticholinergic properties and risk factors associated with prescribing: study site, gender, race, age, and creatinine clearance. RESULTS: Anticholinergic medication prescribing was significantly lower in the PACE program (2.3% of total medications vs. 3.9%; P < 0.05) as well as total medication use (12.1 medications per subject vs. 20.8; P < 0.05 in the long-term care environment). Only the long-term care study site had a significant association with anticholinergic prescribing (odds ratio = 5.04, confidence interval 2.71-9.38). PACE participants also had lower Anticholinergic Risk Scale scores (score of 0, 60.2% PACE vs. 16.2%), reduced fall rates (23.8 per month PACE vs. 66.9), and similar hospitalization rates (5.4 per month PACE vs. 5.7). CONCLUSION: PACE participants were prescribed fewer medications and had lower anticholinergic burden, which potentially lowers their risk of adverse effects. These data support the PACE interdisciplinary model by demonstrating the benefit of team care in appropriate use of medications. It provides a potential blueprint to organizations aimed at reducing potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in older adults.

Development, validation and evaluation of an electronic pharmacological tool: The Drug Burden Index Calculator©.

BACKGROUND: The Drug Burden Index (DBI) is a pharmacological risk assessment tool that measures the total exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medicines, which may impair function in older adults. A computerized clinical decision support system (CCDSS) for DBI has not been previously developed or evaluated. OBJECTIVES: (a) Develop a CCDSS that calculates and generates reports on DBI; (b) validate the CCDSS for accuracy; and (c) evaluate the CCDSS for use in clinical practice. METHODS: The DBI Calculator© application, based on the published formula and Australian registered prescribing information was built and designed using Microsoft Access 2010. Accuracy testing involved the comparison of DBI scores computed manually (gold standard) with those computed using The DBI Calculator© for 25 published medication review case studies. Agreement was measured using Cohen's Kappa statistic. To evaluate the CCDSS application in practice, ten pharmacists completed a performance test and usability survey. Participants were timed performing a DBI calculation with the application for a fictitious patient case. The interface, functionality, clinical applications and user satisfaction of the application were rated using 5-point, Likert-type scales. RESULTS: Excellent agreement between the manual and CCDSS application was observed (Cohen's Kappa 0.95). In the evaluation phase, the average time (mins:sec ± SD) for participants to complete the task was 7:20 ± 1:45 and the DBI Calculator© was considered useful by 80% of pharmacists for recognizing sedative and anticholinergic medicines in practice. CONCLUSION: A reliable CCDSS has been developed to report DBI of older patients taking multiple medications. Future studies should test the utility of The DBI Calculator© in clinical practice.