A Specialized Therapeutic Approach to Chronic Urticaria Refractory to H1-Antihistamines Improves Disease Burden: The Spanish AWARE Experience.

OBJECTIVE: During its first year, the AWARE study assessed disease activity, patient quality of life (QOL), and treatment patterns in chronic urticaria (CU) refractory to H1-antihistamines (H1-AH) in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed an observational, prospective (24 months), international, multicenter study. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and H1-AH-refractory CU (>2 months). At each visit, patients completed questionnaires to assess disease burden (Urticaria Control Test [UCT]), disease activity (7 day-Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]), and QOL (Dermatology Life Quality index [DLQI], Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire [CU-Q2oL], and Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire [AE-QoL]). We present data for Spain. RESULTS: The study population comprised 270 evaluable patients (73.3% female, mean [SD] age, 48.9 [14.7] years). At baseline, 89.3% were prescribed a CU treatment. After 1 year, first- and second-line treatments became less frequent and third-line treatments became more frequent. At baseline, 47.0% of patients experienced angioedema; at 1 year, this percentage had fallen to 11.8%. The mean (SD) AE-QoL score decreased from 45.2 (28.7) to 24.0 (25.8). The mean (SD) UCT score decreased from 7.0 (4.5) to 12.1 (4.1). According to UAS7, 38.2% of patients reported absence of wheals and itch in the previous 7 days at 1 year compared with 8.3% at baseline. The mean (SD) DLQI score decreased from 8.0 (7.4) to 2.8 (4.6). At the 1-year visit, the percentage of patients reporting a high or very high impact on QOL fell from 29.9% to 9.6%. CONCLUSION: H1-AH-refractory CU in Spain is characterized by absence of control of symptoms and a considerable impact on QOL. Continuous follow-up of CU patients and third-line therapies reduce disease burden and improve patients' QOL.

An Update on Assessment, Therapeutic Management, and Patents on Insomnia.

Insomnia is an ordinary situation related to noticeable disability in function and quality of life, mental and actual sickness, and mishappenings. It represents more than 5.5 million appointments to family doctors every year. Nonetheless, the ratio of insomniacs who are treated keeps on being low, demonstrating the requirement for proceeding with advancement and dispersal of effective treatments. Accordingly, it becomes significant to provide a compelling treatment for clinical practice. It indicates a need for the determination of various critical viewpoints for the evaluation of insomnia along with various accessible alternatives for treatment. These alternatives incorporate both nonpharmacological therapy, specifically cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia, and a number of pharmacological treatments like orexin antagonists, "z-drugs," benzodiazepines, selective histamine H1 antagonists, nonselective antihistamines, melatonin receptor agonists, antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants. Besides in individuals whose insomnia is due to restless leg syndrome, depression/mood disorder, or/and circadian disturbance, there is insignificant proof favouring the effectiveness of different prescriptions for the treatment of insomnia though they are widely used. Other pharmacological agents producing sedation should be prescribed with care for insomnia therapy because of greater risk of next-day sleepiness along with known adverse effects and toxicities. This review is also aimed at providing an update on various patents on dosage forms containing drugs for insomnia therapy.

Improvement of patient outcomes following therapeutic optimization of chronic urticaria: two-year data from France as part of the international real-life AWARE study.

BACKGROUND: It is important to assess the burden of chronic urticaria (CU) with real-life studies. The AWARE study was performed in 36 countries over two years in CU patients resistant to H1-antihistamines. OBJECTIVES: To correlate patient-reported outcomes and available therapeutic options in CU patients. MATERIALS & METHODS: The AWARE study was a prospective, non-interventional, international study that included adult patients who have had H1-antihistamine-resistant CU for at least two months. The primary endpoints were the evolution of disease activity (UAS7), urticaria control (UCT), dermatological quality of life (DLQI) and treatment satisfaction (visual analogic scale) during a two-year follow-up. The data from French centres are reported. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included (mean age: 47.8 years; women: 70.7%; mean disease duration: 6.5 years; angioedema: 34.1%). The percentage of patients with CU treatment increased from 56.5% at inclusion to 86.0% after two years (for patients with non-sedative H1-antihistamines from 52.2% to 74.4%, and omalizumab from 2.2% to 25.6%). During the follow-up, the percentage of patients with UAS7 score <6 increased from 12.5% to 60.9%, and patients with well-controlled CU (UCT score >12) increased from 11.1% to 62.2%. The negative impact on quality of life (DLQI >10) decreased from 34.1% to 10.5%. The mean score of patient satisfaction for treatment increased from 4.6 to 7.6. CONCLUSION: The management of CU patients resistant to H1-antihistamines was not optimal at inclusion with uncontrolled disease, impaired quality of life and insufficient treatment. After a two-year follow-up, disease symptoms and quality of life improved, but the therapeutic management could be further optimized.

Antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria remains undertreated: 2-year data from the AWARE study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence describing the benefits of recommended therapies and their impact on the quality of life (QoL) of chronic urticaria (CU) patients is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate disease burden, current treatment schedule, and the use of clinical resources by patients with H1 -antihistamine-refractory CU in Europe. METHODS: AWARE (A World-wide Antihistamine-Refractory chronic urticaria patient Evaluation) is a global, prospective, non-interventional study in the real-world setting, sponsored by the manufacturer of omalizumab. Disease characteristics, pharmacological treatments, and health-related QoL of patients (N = 2727) ≥18 years of age diagnosed with H1 -antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (without inducible urticaria) for >2 months are reported here. RESULTS: Of the 2727 patients included, 1232 (45.2%) and 1278 (46.9%) were successfully followed up for any assessment and for the key outcome, the urticaria control test (UCT) score, respectively, and patients with complete remission (14.1%) were excluded from analyses.The proportion of patients with uncontrolled CSU (UCT score <12) dropped from 78% (n/N = 1641/2104) at baseline to 28.7% (n/N = 269/936) after two years of participation in the AWARE study. In addition, the proportion of patients with no impact of CSU on their QoL (assessed by the Dermatological Life Quality Index) increased to 57% (n/N = 664/1164) from 18.7% (n/N = 491/2621) at baseline. Emergency room visits (2.4% [n/N = 7/296] vs 33.5% [n/N = 779/2322]) and hospital stays (1.7% [n/N = 5/296] vs 24.2% [n/N = 561/2322]) reduced at Month 24 vs baseline. Overall, 23.2% (n/N = 26/112) patients on non-sedating H1 -antihistamines (nsAH) and 41.9% (n/N = 44/105) patients on up-dosed nsAH had uncontrolled CSU (UCT <12) at Month 24. In omalizumab-treated patients, 27.1% (n/N = 78/288) had uncontrolled CSU at Month 24. CONCLUSION: These data confirm improvements for most patients with CSU over a 2-year follow-up period. Further studies are needed to understand the differences between guideline recommendations and reported management.

Chronic urticaria in the real-life clinical practice setting in the UK: results from the noninterventional multicentre AWARE study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a skin condition characterized by repeated occurrence of itchy weals and/or angio-oedema for > 6 weeks. AIM: To provide data demonstrating the real-life burden of CU in the UK. METHODS: This UK subset of the worldwide, prospective, noninterventional AWARE study included patients aged 18-75 years diagnosed with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH)-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) for > 2 months. Baseline characteristics, disease activity, treatments, comorbidities and healthcare resource use were documented. Quality of life (QoL), work productivity and activity impairment were assessed. RESULTS: Baseline analysis included 252 UK patients. Mean age and body mass index were 45.0 years and 29.0 kg/m2 , respectively. Most patients were female (77.8%) and had moderate/severe disease activity (mean Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days was 18.4) and a 'spontaneous' component to their CU (73.4% CSU; 24.6% CSU and chronic inducible urticaria). Common comorbidities included depression/anxiety (24.6%), asthma (23.8%) and allergic rhinitis (12.7%). A previous treatment was recorded for 57.9% of patients. Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index score was 9.5, and patients reported impairments in work productivity and activity. Healthcare resource use was high. Severity of CSU was associated with female sex, obesity, anxiety and diagnosis. Only 28.5% of patients completed all nine study visits, limiting analysis of long-term treatment patterns and disease impact. CONCLUSIONS: Adult H1-AH-refractory patients with CU in the UK reported high rates of healthcare resource use and impairment in QoL, work productivity and activity at baseline. The differing structures of UK healthcare may explain the high study discontinuation rates versus other countries.

Chronic Urticaria in the Real-Life Clinical Practice Setting in Portugal: Baseline Results from the Non-Interventional Multicentre AWARE Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of information regarding chronic urticaria patients' care in a real-world setting. The objective of this study was to report and evaluate the baseline characteristics of Portuguese chronic urticaria patients refractory to H1-antihistamines included in the AWARE study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a non-interventional cohort study. Adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic urticaria with symptoms for at least two months, refractory to H1-antihistamines, consulting one of the 10 participating urticaria centers throughout Portugal have been included in the study. Baseline sociodemographic data, medical history, clinical parameters, medication, weekly urticaria activity score, and dermatology quality of life index have been collected. RESULTS: Seventy six patients were included, of which 76.3% were women. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (88.2%) and 39.5% had angioedema. Around 91.0% of patients were medicated with non-sedative H1-antihistamines and 35.4% with a third line therapy. Median dermatology quality of life index was 5.0 and median weekly urticaria activity score was 13.0. DISCUSSION: The baseline results suggest that patients with chronic urticaria refractory to H1-antihistamines are being under-treated in the real-world setting. CONCLUSION: The AWARE study demonstrates the real impact of chronic urticaria on Portuguese patients refractory to H1-antihistamines treatment, and 30% report a very large or extremely large deleterious effect on their quality of life. The follow-up of these patients will allow evaluating strategies aimed at optimizing disease control.

Introdução: A informação sobre os doentes com urticária crónica em ambiente de vida real é escassa e este estudo teve por objectivo reportar e avaliar as características basais dos doentes portugueses com urticária crónica refractários aos anti-histamínicos H1 incluídos no estudo AWARE. Material e Métodos: Estudo de coorte não intervencional. Foram incluídos doentes adultos com diagnóstico de urticária crónica sintomáticos durante pelo menos dois meses, refratários aos anti-histamínicos H1, seguidos em 10 centros de urticária em Portugal. Foram recolhidos dados basais sociodemográficos, história clínica, parâmetros clínicos, medicação, índice semanal de atividade de urticária e índice de qualidade de vida dermatológico. Resultados: Foram incluídos 76 doentes, dos quais 76,3% mulheres. A maioria dos doentes estava diagnosticado com urticária crónica espontânea (88,2%) e 39,5% apresentavam angioedema. Cerca de 91,0% dos doentes estavam medicados com anti-histamínicos H1 não sedativos e 35,4% com terapêuticas de terceira linha. A mediana do índice de qualidade de vida dermatológico foi 5,0 e a mediana do índice semanal de atividade de urticária foi 13,0. Discussão: Os resultados basais sugerem que os doentes com urticária crónica refratários ao tratamento com anti-histamínicos H1 estão sub-tratados em ambiente de vida real. Conclusão: O estudo AWARE vem demonstrar o real impacto da urticária crónica nos doentes portugueses refratários ao tratamento com anti-histamínicos H1 onde mais de 30% reporta um impacto elevado ou extremamente elevado da doença na sua qualidade de vida. O seguimento destes doentes permitirá avaliar estratégias para otimização do controlo da doença.

Open-label safety assessment of bilastine in elderly patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Bilastine is an H1-antihistamine approved for symptomatic treatment of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or urticaria. The safety profile of bilastine in clinical trials of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or urticaria, assessed by type and frequency of adverse events (AE), was similar to that of placebo. OBJECTIVE: As part of the risk management plan for bilastine, the safety profile of bilastine in the elderly was assessed. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational, open-label, 3-month follow-up study was performed to assess the safety profile of bilastine 20 mg in patients aged ≥65 years with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or urticaria. RESULTS: A total of 74 of 146 patients (50.7%) reported 129 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAE) during the study period. The incidence of TEAEs was low, with monthly and quarterly rates of 0.29 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.229-0.367) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.688-1.100), respectively. Monthly and quarterly incidence rates were 0.04 (95% CI, 0.016-0.082) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.048-0.246), respectively, for related TEAEs (eight TEAEs in seven patients) and were 0.02 (95% CI, 0.003-0.048) and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.010-0.143), respectively, for serious TEAEs (five TEAES in three patients). All serious TEAEs were considered to be unrelated to bilastine. CONCLUSION: Bilastine 20 mg showed a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of TEAEs in patients aged ≥65 years. The results were in accordance with the known safety profile of bilastine 20 mg and incidence of AEs reported in previous studies and described in the approved summary of product characteristics.

Unmet medical needs for chronic spontaneous urticaria patients: highlighting the real-life clinical practice in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for chronic spontaneous/idiopathic urticaria (CSU) are available; however, only 50% of patients are well controlled with approved doses of H1-antihistamines, and certain patients remain symptomatic despite receiving up to 4× the approved dose of H1-antihistamines plus H2 antihistamines and/or leucotriene-receptor antagonists. OBJECTIVES: To highlight real-life clinical practice in Taiwan and to understand the unmet medical needs of CSU patients. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional, observational survey of 50 dermatologists and 200 CSU patients was conducted between June 2013 and November 2013. Face-to-face interviews of dermatologists and online interviews of CSU patients were conducted independently. RESULTS: Dermatologists reported that dermographism and blood tests were the most commonly used diagnostic methods to confirm the diagnosis. The key driving factor for most clinic-based dermatologists (70%) in choosing a treatment was 'response to my medicines', and most preferred H1-antihistamines and steroids for treating CSU patients, whereas most hospital-based dermatologists (85%) gave higher priority to 'severity and impact of the conditions'. Patients were reported to have high psychological pressures and significant impact of CSU on their daily activity. In addition, CSU patients were not satisfied with their current treatment and 69% of patients switched their first-consulted physician. Furthermore, lack of information and concerns about side-effects were major factors which held back patients from seeking Western treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unmet medical need of CSU patients in Taiwan highlighting gaps among guidelines, real-life clinical practice, patients' perceptions and patients' knowledge of their disease.

Assessment of the effects of antihistamine drugs on mood, sleep quality, sleepiness, and dream anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: There are limited comparative studies on classic and new-generation antihistamines that affect sleep quality and mood. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the effects of classic and new-generation antihistamines on sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, dream anxiety, and mood. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with chronic pruritus completed study in the dermatology outpatient clinic. Treatments with regular recommended therapeutic doses were administered. The effects of antihistaminic drugs on mood, daytime sleepiness, dream anxiety, and sleep quality were assessed on the first day and 1 month after. RESULTS: Outpatients who received cetirizine and hydroxyzine treatments reported higher scores on the depression, anxiety, and fatigue sub-scales than those who received desloratadine, levocetirizine, and rupatadine. Pheniramine and rupatadine were found to be associated with daytime sleepiness and better sleep quality. UKU side effects scale scores were significantly elevated among outpatients receiving pheniramine. Classic antihistamines increased daytime sleepiness and decreased the sleep quality scores. New-generation antihistamines reduced sleep latency and dream anxiety, and increased daytime sleepiness and sleep quality. CONCLUSION: Both antihistamines, significantly increased daytime sleepiness and nocturnal sleep quality. Daytime sleepiness was significantly predicted by rupadatine and pheniramine treatment. Cetirizine and hydroxyzine, seem to have negative influences on mood states. Given the extensive use of antihistamines in clinical settings, these results should be more elaborately examined in further studies.

A comprehensive evaluation of rationality of cough and cold medicines available in Indian market.

To analyse various cough and cold formulations available in the Indian market and to study their pharmacological rationale and cost effectiveness, a cross-sectional, observational study was carried out for evaluation of the drugs listed in Current Index of Medical Specialities (CIMS) India, September 2010.The formulations were assessed for their total number, type of dosage form, number of constituents in each formulation, their pharmacological group and rationality. The total daily cost and its association with type of dosage form was analysed. Out of a total 1297 preparations evaluated, 94% were fixed dose combination. The mean number of constituents was 3.20 +/- 1.03. Liquid oral formulations were largest in number (64.4%). The formulations contained various antitussives (30.30%), expectorants (33.92%), antihistamines (71.09%), mucolytics (35.62%), decongestants (56.28%), bronchodilators (16.81%) and analgesics/antipyretics (31.30%). None of the preparation was listed in the Model list of Essential Medicines, WHO (March 2011) under section 25 of "Medicines acting on the respiratory tract". Only 2% of the preparations had pharmacological rationale for their use in cough and common cold; 9.6% were containing more than one ingredient of the same pharmacological group and 6.85% were containing both antitussive and expectorant having opposing action. Highest number of preparations (36.85%) was having cost of therapy of Rs 6-10 per day. Liquid oral dosage forms had significantly higher cost than solid dosage form (p < 0.0001) and topical nasal dosage forms had significantly higher cost than liquid (p < 0.03) and solid (p < 0.001) dosage forms. It is conducted that various cough and cold medicines available in Indian market lacked therapeutic rationale for their use, leading to wasteful expenditure.

Influence of initial treatment modality on long-term control of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a common cutaneous disorder but the influence of initial treatment modality on long-term control is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical features, and the influence of initial treatment modality on long-term control. METHODS AND RESULTS: 641 CIU patients were enrolled from the allergy clinic in a tertiary referral hospital. Disease duration, aggravating factors and treatment modality at each visit were evaluated. Times required to reach a controlled state were analyzed according to initial treatment modality, using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the Cox proportional-hazards model, and propensity scores. Female to male ratio was 1.7: 1; mean age at onset was 40.5 years. The most common aggravating factors were food (33.5%), stress (31.5%) and fatigue (21.6%). Most patients (82.2%) used H1-antihistamines alone as initial treatment while 17% used a combination treatment with oral corticosteroids. There was no significant difference in the time taken to reach a controlled state between patients treated with single vs multiple H1-antihistamines or between those who received H1-antihistamine monotherapy vs. a combination therapy with oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: The time required to control CIU is not reduced by use of multiple H1-antihistamines or oral corticosteroids in the initial treatment.

Alcaftadine for the prevention of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of alcaftadine for the prevention of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis. DATA SOURCES: A medical literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed (2006-February 2012) and EMBASE (2006-February 2012) using the search terms alcaftadine and Lastacaft. References from these publications were reviewed for additional resources. Additional information was collected from Web sites of the US government (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, http://www.fda.gov) and of Allergan Inc., the manufacturer of Lastacaft (http://www.lastacaft.com). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All identified articles and publications in English were reviewed for pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety data. Priority was placed on clinical trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two published clinical trials evaluated the efficacy of alcaftadine in the prevention of ocular itching and conjunctival redness associated with allergic conjunctivitis. One trial compared alcaftadine to placebo, and another trial compared alcaftadine to placebo and olopatadine HCl to placebo. Both studies showed superior efficacy, both clinically and statistically, in the prevention of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis compared to placebo. Although conjunctival redness was evaluated in the 2 trials, neither trial demonstrated both clinical and statistical significance. Both trials demonstrated a rapid onset of action of less than 15 minutes, as well as a duration of action greater than 16 hours, which supports the use of once-daily administration. Overall, alcaftadine was well tolerated, and common adverse effects, reported in less than 4% of patients, included ocular irritation, pruritus, erythema, and stinging or burning upon instillation. Ocular adverse effects were typically mild in severity and self-limiting. CONCLUSIONS: Alcaftadine is a safe and effective option for the prevention of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis, is dosed once daily, and is competitively priced among prescription medications for allergic conjunctivitis. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the comparative efficacy among ocular antihistamine/mast cell stabilizing medications.

Drugs for insomnia.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep is a vital neurochemical process involving sleep-promoting and arousal centers in the brain. Insomnia is a pervasive disorder characterized by difficulties in initiating or maintaining or non-refreshing (poor quality) sleep and clinically significant daytime distress. Insomnia is more prevalent in women and old age and puts sufferers at significant physical and mental health risks. This review summarizes published data on the current and emerging insomnia drug classes, rationale for development and associated risks/benefits. (Summary of Product Characteristics and Medline search on "hypnotic" or specific drug names and "Insomnia"). AREAS COVERED: GABA(A) receptor modulators facilitate sleep onset and some improve maintenance but increase risk of dependence, memory, cognitive and psychomotor impairments, falls, accidents and mortality. Melatonin receptor agonists improve quality of sleep and/or sleep onset but response may develop over several days. They have more benign safety profiles and are indicated for milder insomnia, longer usage and (prolonged release melatonin) older patients. Histamine H-1 receptor antagonists improve sleep maintenance but their effects on cognition, memory and falls remain to be demonstrated. Late-stage pipeline orexin OX1/OX2 and serotonin 5HT2A receptor antagonists may hold the potential to address several unmet needs in insomnia pharmacotherapy but safety issues cast some doubts over their future. EXPERT OPINION: Current and new insomnia drugs in the pipeline target different sleep regulating mechanisms and symptoms and have different tolerability profiles. Drug selection would ideally be based on improvement in the quality of patients' sleep, overall quality of life and functional status weighed against risk to the individual and public health.

Assessment of type of allergy and antihistamine use in the development of glioma.

BACKGROUND: Allergies have been associated with decreased risk of glioma; but, associations between duration and timing of allergies, and antihistamine use and glioma risk have been less consistent. The objective was to investigate this association by analyzing types, number, years since diagnosis, and age at diagnosis of allergies, and information on antihistamine usage, including type, duration, and frequency of exposure. METHODS: Self-report data on medically diagnosed allergies and antihistamine use were obtained for 419 glioma cases and 612 hospital-based controls from Duke University and NorthShore University HealthSystem. RESULTS: High- and low-grade glioma cases were statistically significantly less likely to report any allergy than controls (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.87 and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25-0.76, respectively). The number of types of allergies (seasonal, medication, pet, food, and other) was inversely associated with glioma risk in a dose-response manner (P value for trend < 0.05). Age at diagnosis and years since diagnosis of allergies were not associated with glioma risk. Oral antihistamine use was statistically significantly inversely associated with glioma risk, but when stratified by allergy status, remained significant only for those with high-grade glioma and no medically diagnosed allergy. CONCLUSIONS: All types of allergies appear to be protective with reduced risk for those with more types of allergies. Antihistamine use, other than in relationship with allergy status, may not influence glioma risk. IMPACT: A comprehensive study of allergies and antihistamine use using standardized questions and biological markers will be essential to further delineate the biological mechanism that may be involved in brain tumor development.

Costs of second-generation antihistamines in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: US perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacoeconomic literature evaluating use of antihistamines in treating allergic rhinitis (AR) in the US. METHODS: Three independent reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of the current literature with PubMed. They identified articles describing original research comprising US cost analyses or pharmacoeconomic evaluations that reported both costs and consequences of using second-generation anthistamines (SGAs), first-generation antihistamines (FGAs), or both for the treatment of patients with AR. The search was limited to studies performed in humans and published in English between 1998 and 2008. RESULTS: Five of 200 articles met the inclusion criteria and examined costs associated primarily with chlorpheniramine, diphenhydramine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine. The first two studies retrospectively analyzed a claims database and concluded that fexofenadine was associated with slightly lower overall costs than loratadine and cetirizine. A third study compared total healthcare costs associated with FGAs and SGAs, concluding that despite their higher prescription cost, SGAs result in lower medical resource use and lower cost for treatment of AR versus FGAs, although no individual SGA could be distinguished as providing substantial healthcare cost savings or increased cost-effectiveness over the other SGAs. Two studies investigated the impact of transitioning a prescription SGA to over-the-counter status and concluded that such a transition would provide cost savings to healthcare plans, but did not address the cost or health effect of such a switch on specific populations whose plans might no longer cover prescription SGAs. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that newer SGAs offer clinical, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic advantages that may translate into superior cost-effectiveness in the treatment of AR. Further study is warranted to clarify the pharmacoeconomic impact of the newer SGAs and to establish their relative cost-effectiveness.

Treatment modalities, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients diagnosed with interstitial cystitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine treatment modalities, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients diagnosed with interstitial cystitis (IC). STUDY DESIGN: Patients with a diagnosis of IC were identified from a national managed care administration claims database and classified into treatment cohorts. All-cause health care resource utilization and costs were calculated by treatment cohort. RESULTS: Patients treated with narcotics plus nonnarcotic analgesics were associated with higher mean health care costs. Patient cohorts treated with some of the more common oral therapies for interstitial cystitis, including pentosan polysulfate sodium, amitriptyline, and hydroxyzine, were associated with lower costs. Physician visits were fewest among patients treated with pentosan polysulfate sodium plus amitriptyline and hydroxyzine. Physician visits were higher for cohorts that included dimethyl sulfoxide plus cystoscopy or bladder irrigation, or narcotics plus nonnarcotic analgesics. CONCLUSION: Interstitial cystitis is associated with substantial costs and health care resource utilization.

Seasonal allergic rhinitis: limited effectiveness of treatments.

(1) Seasonal allergic rhinitis, otherwise known as hayfever, is a harmless condition, although it can cause major discomfort and interfere with activities of daily living. We conducted a review of the literature, based on our in-house methodology, to determine the risk-benefits of treatments used in this setting. (2) Placebo-controlled trials show that sodium cromoglicate relieves symptoms, especially if it is used before symptoms appear. Adverse effects are rare with sodium cromoglicate nasal solutions and eye drops. (3) Nasal steroids have well-documented efficacy. Beclometasone is the best choice. Adverse effects include epistaxis, nasal irritation and, occasionally, systemic disorders. (4) Oral antihistamines are less effective than nasal steroids. They also provoke adverse effects, especially drowsiness. Nasal azelastine seems to have a similar efficacy as oral antihistamines. (5) The adverse effects of systemic steroids must not be overlooked, especially with long-term use. Oral administration is an alternative for severe symptoms that do not respond to other treatments, although this is rarely the case. Long-acting intramuscular steroids carry an increased risk of adverse effects. (6) Despite evaluation in several randomised controlled trials, there is no firm evidence that homeopathic preparations have any specific efficacy in allergic rhinitis. (7) Vasoconstrictors, ipratropium and montelukast, have negative risk-benefit balances in hay fever. (8) When a single allergen is responsible (grasses, ragweed, birch), clinical trials suggest that specific desensitisation can provide a modest improvement. However, this treatment carries a risk of local adverse effects, as well as a risk of rare but severe anaphylactic reactions, especially in patients who also have unstable severe asthma. (9) Sublingual desensitisation seems to be even less effective than subcutaneous desensitisation in adults. Follow-up is too short to know whether there is a risk of severe anaphylactic reactions. The results of paediatric studies are even less convincing. (10) In practice, when drug therapy is needed to relieve symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, sodium cromoglicate is the first-line treatment. If a nasal steroid solution is chosen, it should be used for the shortest possible period.

Current landscape of insomnia in managed care.

Insomnia affects a large percentage of the population, particularly the elderly. Literature reports varying estimates of prevalence, a variation that relates to the lack of definition and consistency in diagnostic criteria. Primary insomnia (not caused by known physical/mental conditions) responds to pharmacologic therapy, while secondary insomnia(resulting from other illnesses, medications, or sleep disorders) responds to pharmacologic and psychologic treatments (cognitive therapy, relaxation techniques, stimulus control). Use of certain agents in the elderly and patients with abuse/addiction potential is a concern. Medicare Part D does not cover benzodiazepines (classified as controlled substances). Nonprescription agents are affordable but have sedation and anticholinergic side effects. Medication use should be considered a possible contributing factor. Insomnia patients experience significantly more limited activity and higher total health services than those without insomnia. Annual costs are between $92.5 billion and $107.5 billion. A standard definition and better pathways to recognize and treat insomnia are needed.

Assessment of combined symptom and medication scores for rhinoconjunctivitis immunotherapy clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials the efficacy of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is evaluated using the Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS). Effective treatment is associated with lower ARTSS relative to placebo. For ethical reasons patients are provided with registered rescue medication, which may alleviate symptoms and thus reduce symptom scores. This effect biases the mean difference in ARTSS between effective treatment and placebo towards zero. Therefore, when rescue medication is taken by a patient, the ARTSS needs to be adjusted appropriately. METHODS: We considered five outcome measures: ARTSS, Average Rescue Medication Score (ARMS), and three combined symptom and RMSs. To assess the different outcome measures regarding their power to discriminate between effective treatment and placebo, we calculated their effect size when applied to data from a clinical trial of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. RESULTS: Of the five outcome measures considered, the average of the ARTSS and ARMS was associated with the largest effect size, and thus with the highest power to show treatment efficacy. Discriminant and multivariate analyses suggest that this average is approximately optimal among all weighted sums of ARTSS and ARMS. CONCLUSION: Our findings support recommendations made in a World Allergy Organisation document on methodological aspects of immunotherapy trials. The average of the ARTSS and ARMS should be considered as a primary efficacy variable in clinical trials of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.