Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 90
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Womens Health Issues ; 34(1): 7-13, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the years immediately following the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s contraceptive coverage requirement, out-of-pocket costs fell for all Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive methods and use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) increased. This analysis examines whether these trends have continued through 2020 for privately insured women. METHODS: Using 2006-2020 MarketScan data, we examined trends in prescription contraceptive use and out-of-pocket costs among women 13 to 49 years old. Multivariable analyses model the likelihood of contraceptive use and paying $0 post-ACA requirement (vs. pre-ACA requirement) for contraception, controlling for age group, U.S. region, urban versus rural, and cohort year. RESULTS: The likelihood of LARC insertion increased post-ACA requirement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.127, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.121-1.133), with insertion rates peaking at 3.73% for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and 1.08% for implants in 2019, before declining with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Although the likelihood of paying $0 for LARC increased after the ACA requirement (IUD: aOR 5.495, 95% CI 5.278-5.716; implant: aOR 7.199, 95% CI 6.992-7.412), the proportion of individuals paying $0 declined to 69% for IUDs and 73% for implants in 2020, after having peaked at 88% in 2014 and 90% in 2016, respectively. For oral contraceptives, both use (aOR 1.028, 95% CI 1.026-1.030) and paying $0 (aOR 20.399, 95% CI 20.301-20.499) increased significantly after the ACA requirement. CONCLUSION: With the exception of oral contraceptives, the proportion of individuals paying $0 for all contraceptive methods declined after peaking in 2014 for IUDs, 2016 for the implant, and 2019 for non-LARC methods. Future monitoring is needed to understand the continuing impact of the ACA requirement on prescription contraceptive use and costs.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pandemias , Cobertura do Seguro , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Prescrições
2.
South Med J ; 113(5): 213-218, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358615

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Women with substance use disorders experience unique challenges to contraceptive obtainment and user-dependent method adherence, contributing to higher than average rates of unintended pregnancy. This study estimated the prevalence of barriers to contraception and their associations with contraceptive use and unwanted pregnancies among women receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) in northeast Tennessee. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was piloted among female patients aged 18 to 55 years from 2 OAT clinics. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between contraceptive barriers and current contraceptive use and previous unwanted pregnancies among women receiving OAT. RESULTS: Of 91 participants, most experienced previous pregnancies (97.8%), with more than half reporting unwanted pregnancies (52.8%). Although 60% expressed a strong desire to avoid pregnancy, ambivalence toward becoming pregnant was common (30.0%). Most experienced ≥1 barriers to contraceptive use or obtainment (75.8%), the most prevalent being aversion to adverse effects (53.8%), healthcare provider stigmatization (30.7%), scheduled appointment compliance (30.3%), and prohibitive cost (25.0%). Experience of any contraceptive barrier (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-36.79) and access to a contraceptive provider (AOR 5.01, 95% CI 1.34-18.77) were positively associated with current use of prescribed contraceptives, whereas prohibitive cost was negatively associated (AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Although most participants desired to avoid pregnancy, ambivalence or uncertainty of pregnancy intention was common. Most experienced barriers to contraception, which were more strongly associated with previous unwanted pregnancy than current contraceptive use. The provision of long-acting reversible contraceptives and contraceptive education at OAT clinics represents an opportunity to reduce the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estereotipagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Agendamento de Consultas , Coerção , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Implantes de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Modelos Logísticos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Gravidez não Desejada , Esterilização Reprodutiva , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 42(3): 887-894, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rapid change in the socio-demographic pattern and changing beliefs toward fertility and birth spacing have resulted in a notable increase in the use of oral anticonceptives in the Saudi Arabian community. However, information on the current utilization of oral anticonceptives and attitudes toward their use remains sparse. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the utilization pattern of oral anticonceptives, attitude toward pill use, and incidence of side effects among Saudi women. SETTING: The study was conducted in a community setting in Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Eligible Saudi women routinely using oral anticonceptive pills were invited to participate in this prospective, cross-sectional survey. Data were collected using a standardized, pretested, semi-structured questionnaire. Jazan was selected as it recorded the highest number of women using contraceptives in Saudi Arabia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The pattern of pill utilization, attitude toward pill use, and incidence of side effects. RESULTS: A total of 496 women consented to participate in this study. Most of the respondents (87.5%) were using or had used oral anticonceptives for birth control. In nearly half (49.2%) of participants, oral pills were advised by a gynaecologist, and approximately two-thirds (69.0%) were using or had used combined oral anticonceptives. Nearly two-thirds (63.1%) of respondents preferred pills over other contraception methods due to their ease of use. More than one-third (39.3%) of participants agreed that oral pills are safe. Approximately half (53.2%) of participants were aware that a missed pill must be taken immediately after recalling that a dose was missed. A total of 69.6% of participants experienced at least one side effect, of which mood swings (61.1%), weight gain or increase appetite (42.2%), decreased libido (34.1%), and nausea (31.2%) were most common. CONCLUSION: Saudi women had a high acceptance rate for oral anticonceptives as a legitimate method to prevent unintended pregnancy. This was associated with a modest degree of understanding about their risks and benefits. Pharmacists should provide up-to-date information and counsel patients about the use and side effects of oral anticonceptives.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adulto , Intervalo entre Nascimentos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/administração & dosagem , Anticoncepcionais Orais/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Arábia Saudita , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 32(1): 24-34, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809400

RESUMO

Although generic oral contraceptives (OCPs) can improve adherence and reduce health care expenditures, use of generic OCPs remains low, and the factors that affect generic prescribing are not well understood. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators of generic OCP prescribing and potential solutions to increase generic OCP prescribing, as well as pilot an educational module to address clinician misconceptions about generic OCPs. We developed focus group scripts using the 4D model of appreciative inquiry. A total of four focus groups occurred, two at the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) national conference and two at the American College of Physicians (ACP) Internal Medicine meeting. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using a constant comparative method with no a priori hypothesis to generate emerging and reoccurring themes. Findings from these focus groups were used to develop an educational module promoting generic OCP prescribing. Participants were recruited from the AANP Network for Research and the ACP Research Panel. This study demonstrates that health system factors, workflow factors, clinician factors, and patient factors were the main barriers to and facilitators of generic OCP prescribing. Nurse practitioners were responsive to an educational module and reported increased willingness to discuss and prescribe generic OCPs after completing the module. Interventions to increase generic OCP prescribing must address clinician and patient factors within the context of workflow and larger health system factors.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Profissionais de Enfermagem/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Currículo/normas , Currículo/tendências , Prescrições de Medicamentos/classificação , Grupos Focais/métodos , Humanos , Profissionais de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
BMC Womens Health ; 19(1): 120, 2019 10 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31627718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine whether use of intrauterine device (IUD) is influenced by a history of induced abortion and the type of contraceptives used until costs are covered. METHODS: We analyzed data from 301 female residents in Mecklenburg-West Pomerania, an economically challenged community. The women, aged between 20 and 35 years, were entitled to receive unemployment benefits, and had access to free-of-charge oral contraceptives, ring or IUD. Cross-sectional data were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 112 (37.2%) women with a history of induced abortion, and 46 (15.3%) reported exclusively using less effective contraceptives (e.g. condoms). In a univariate logistic regression, use of an IUD was associated with a history of having had an induced abortion. Furthermore, uptake of an IUD was associated with women who had, until costs were covered, exclusively choice to use less effective contraceptives (OR = 3.281, 95% CI: 1.717; 6.273). Both associations remained significant in a multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: Free contraceptives provided to women receiving unemployment benefits may increase the use of IUDs, especially among those with a history of an induced abortion and those using less effective contraceptives.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/economia , Dispositivos Anticoncepcionais Femininos/economia , Dispositivos Anticoncepcionais Femininos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/economia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/economia , Modelos Logísticos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Desemprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health ; 51(1): 43-53, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817858

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Although an association between gender equality and contraceptive use has been confirmed among adult samples, few studies have explored this relationship among adolescents. An examination of whether adolescents' contraceptive use is more prevalent in countries with higher levels of gender equality is needed to fill this gap. METHODS: Nationally representative data from 33 countries that participated in the 2013-2014 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children study and country-level measures of gender equality-using the 2014 Global Gender Gap Index-were analyzed. Multilevel multinomial logistic regression analyses were employed to assess associations between gender equality and contraceptive use (condom only, pill only and dual methods) at last intercourse as reported by 4,071 females and 4,110 males aged 14-16. RESULTS: Increasing gender equality was positively associated with contraceptive use among both males and females. For every 0.1-point increase on the equality scale, the likelihood of condom use at last intercourse rose (odds ratio, 2.1 for females), as did the likelihood of pill use (6.5 and 9.6, respectively, for males and females) and dual method use (2.1 and 5.6, respectively). Associations with pill use and dual use remained significant after national wealth and income inequality were controlled for. Overall, associations were stronger for females than for males. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to identify potential causal pathways and mechanisms through which gender equality and adolescents' contraceptive use may influence one another.


Assuntos
Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Direitos da Mulher/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Canadá , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Direitos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Israel , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances
7.
Stud Fam Plann ; 50(1): 3-24, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30791104

RESUMO

Contraceptive failure is a major contributor to unintended pregnancy worldwide. DHS retrospective calendars, which are the most widely used data source for estimating contraceptive failure in low-income countries, vary in quality across countries and surveys. We identified surveys with the most reliable calendar data and analyzed 105,322 episodes of contraceptive use from 15 DHSs conducted between 1992 and 2014. We estimate contraceptive method-specific 12-month failure rates. We also examined how failure rates vary by age, education, socioeconomic status, contraceptive intention, residence, and marital status using multilevel piecewise exponential hazard models. Our failure rate estimates are significantly lower than results from the United States and slightly higher than previous studies that included more DHS surveys, including some with lower-quality data. We estimate age-specific global contraceptive failure rates and find strong, consistent age patterns with the youngest users experiencing failure rates up to ten times higher than older women for certain methods. Failure also varies by socioeconomic status, with the poorest, and youngest, women at highest risk of experiencing unintended pregnancy due to failure.


Assuntos
Eficácia de Contraceptivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Escolaridade , Estado Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Coito Interrompido , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais/administração & dosagem , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Implantes de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Intenção , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Multinível , Métodos Naturais de Planejamento Familiar/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Características de Residência , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
8.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0210089, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30699134

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop a preliminary cost-effectiveness model that compares oral contraceptives and 'no hormonal treatment' for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. METHODS: A de novo preliminary state transition (Markov) model was developed. The model was informed by systematic literature review and expert opinion. The uncertainty around the results was assessed both by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The economic evaluation was conducted from National Health Service (NHS) England perspective. The main outcome measure was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), with cost-effectiveness plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves presented for alternative willingness-to-pay thresholds. RESULTS: Oral contraceptives dominated 'no hormonal treatment' and provided more QALYs at a lower cost than 'no hormonal treatment', with a cost-effectiveness probability of 98%. A one-way sensitivity analysis excluding general practitioner consultations showed that oral contraceptives were still cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses showed that oral contraceptives could be an effective option for the treatment of endometriosis, as this treatment was shown to provide a higher level of QALYs at a lower cost, compared to 'no hormonal treatment'. The results are subject to considerable parameter uncertainty as a range of assumptions were required as part of the modelling process.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Endometriose/complicações , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Anticoncepcionais Orais/economia , Endometriose/terapia , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Dor/etiologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Medicina Estatal/economia
9.
Lancet Glob Health ; 7(2): e227-e235, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30683240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rise in contraceptive use has largely been driven by short-acting methods of contraception, despite the high effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptives. Several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have made important progress increasing the use of modern contraceptives, but important inequalities remain. We assessed the prevalence and demand for modern contraceptive use in Latin America and the Caribbean with data from national health surveys. METHODS: Our data sources included demographic and health surveys, multiple indicator cluster surveys, and reproductive health surveys carried out since 2004 in 23 countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. Analyses were based on sexually active women aged 15-49 years irrespective of marital status, except in Argentina and Brazil, where analyses were restricted to women who were married or in a union. We calculated contraceptive prevalence and demand for family planning satisfied. Contraceptive prevalence was defined as the percentage of sexually active women aged 15-49 years who (or whose partners) were using a contraceptive method at the time of the survey. Demand for family planning satisfied was defined as the proportion of women in need of contraception who were using a contraceptive method at the time of the survey. We separated survey data for modern contraceptive use by type of contraception used (long-acting, short-acting, or permanent). We also stratified survey data by wealth, area of residence, education, ethnicity, age, and a combination of wealth and area of residence. Wealth-related absolute and relative inequalities were estimated both for contraceptive prevalence and demand for family planning satisfied. FINDINGS: We report on surveys from 23 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, analysing a sample of 212 573 women. The lowest modern contraceptive prevalence was observed in Haiti (31·3%) and Bolivia (34·6%); inequalities were wide in Bolivia, but almost non-existent in Haiti. Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, and Paraguay had over 70% of modern contraceptive prevalence with low absolute inequalities. Use of long-acting reversible contraceptives was below 10% in 17 of the 23 countries. Only Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Ecuador, Paraguay, and Trinidad and Tobago had more than 10% of women adopting long-acting contraceptive methods. Mexico was the only country in which long-acting contraceptive methods were more frequently used than short-acting methods. Young women aged 15-17 years, indigenous women, those in lower wealth quintiles, those living in rural areas, and those without education showed particularly low use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. INTERPRETATION: Long-acting reversible contraceptives are seldom used in Latin America and the Caribbean. Because of their high effectiveness, convenience, and ease of continuation, availability of long-acting reversible contraceptives should be expanded and their use promoted, including among young and nulliparous women. In addition to suitable family planning services, information and counselling should be provided to women on a personal basis. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, Pan American Health Organization.


Assuntos
Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais/administração & dosagem , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo/estatística & dados numéricos , Esterilização Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Região do Caribe , Anticoncepção Pós-Coito/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Implantes de Medicamento/uso terapêutico , Escolaridade , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Povos Indígenas , América Latina , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Métodos Naturais de Planejamento Familiar/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades , População Rural , Espermicidas/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
10.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 41(1): 29-37, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30316712

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Non-use of contraception is an important contributor to unintended pregnancy. This study assessed non-use of contraception and its determinants among Canadian youth aged 15 to 24. METHODS: Data from the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey respondents aged 15 to 24 were used to identify non-users of contraception among heterosexual youth who had had intercourse within the previous 12 months, were not pregnant or sterilized, and felt it was important to avoid pregnancy. Sociodemographic, behavioural, and geographic factors were compared for non-users and users of contraception. RESULTS: Among youth at risk for unintended pregnancy, 15.5% were non-users of contraception. There were no differences between sexes. Across regions of Canada, Quebéc had the highest proportion of at-risk youth, but at-risk Quebéc youth were the least likely to be non-users (7.4%; CI 5.7%-9.0%) compared with at-risk youth in the Territories (28.3%; CI 21.6%-35.0%). In the multivariable analysis, aside from residence outside of Quebéc, younger age, lower income, Aboriginal identification (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.67; CI 1.18-2.37), and smoking (aOR 1.55; CI 1.24-1.92) were associated with non-use. Canadian-born youth (aOR 0.61; CI 0.39-0.96) and those enrolled in school (aOR 0.63; CI 0.50-0.81) were less likely to be non-users. CONCLUSION: The 15.5% of Canadian youth at risk for unintended pregnancy who were non-users of contraception represent an estimated 300 000 Canadian youth. Policies and programs to promote and support access to sexual health services and effective contraception with specific attention to supporting the needs of younger teens, Aboriginal youth, newcomers, low-income youth, and youth who are not in school are needed.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Canadá/epidemiologia , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/etnologia , Dispositivos Anticoncepcionais Femininos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Povos Indígenas/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Parceiros Sexuais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Espermicidas/uso terapêutico , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
11.
BMC Womens Health ; 18(1): 159, 2018 09 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268130

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Abortion rate in Ukraine is high and the use of effective contraceptive methods is low. Aiming to explore women's knowledge and attitudes towards modern contraceptive methods, we performed a survey among women with a recent pregnancy. METHODS: A convenience sample of 500 women who had an abortion or a delivery (250 women post abortion and 250 women post partum) in Kiev, Ukraine was chosen to participate in the study. A self-administered questionnaire which included questions regarding demographics, plans for future pregnancy, and contraceptive usage, knowledge and the main barriers to contraceptive uptake was distributed. RESULTS: Most women in our study expressed a wish to postpone or refrain from future pregnancies after the current abortion or delivery. The experience of and the knowledge regarding long acting contraception (LARC) such as intrauterine contraception (IUC) and implants were however low. Barrier methods and oral contraceptives were the most commonly used methods while only a few women had used IUC. CONCLUSION: Since most of the respondents did not want a pregnancy in the near future, the findings from this study thus indicate a low uptake for effective and acceptable contraceptive methods and especially LARC methods. Increasing the availability of LARC methods as well as adequate and updated information from providers are essential to reduce the rate of unplanned pregnancy and abortion among Ukrainian women.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/psicologia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Gravidez não Planejada/psicologia , Gravidez/psicologia , Gestantes/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ucrânia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 14(5): 479-487, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28655491

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated that private health insurance plans cover prescribed contraceptive services for women, including oral contraceptives (OCs), without charging a patient any cost-sharing beginning in August 2012. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the ACA's contraceptive coverage requirement on the utilization and out-of-pocket costs of prescribed OCs after two years of implementation. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was designed using data from the 2010 to 2014 waves of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. The sample consisted of reproductive-aged women who have either private health insurance or Medicaid. Utilization of OCs was evaluated using 1) the proportion of women who purchased any OCs and 2) the mean annual number of cycles prescribed per woman. Out-of-pocket costs for OCs were evaluated using 1) the proportion of women who had any OC purchase with $0 out-of-pocket costs, 2) the mean annual out-of-pocket costs per woman, and 3) the mean out-of-pocket costs per cycle. Descriptive analyses and a difference-in-difference linear regression approach were used. MAIN FINDINGS: No substantial changes were seen in the utilization of OCs after the ACA requirement became effective. The difference-in-difference regression showed that the proportion of women who had any OC purchase with $0 out-of-pocket costs increased significantly by 54.0 percentage points after the ACA requirement in the private insurance group relative to the Medicaid group. Mean annual out-of-pocket costs in the private insurance group dropped by 37% in the first year and an additional 52% decrease was found in the second year of the policy. Mean out-of-pocket costs per cycle also decreased substantially in the private insurance group by 39% in the first year and an additional decrease of 44% was seen in the second year. CONCLUSIONS: The ACA's contraceptive coverage requirement markedly reduced out-of-pocket costs of prescribed OCs for women with private health insurance.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais/economia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 109(10)2017 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117355

RESUMO

With recent ovarian cancer screening studies showing no clinically significant mortality benefit, preventing this disease, identifying high-risk populations, and extending survival remain priorities. However, several challenges are impeding progress in ovarian cancer research. With most studies capturing exposure information from 10 or more years ago, evaluation of how changing patterns of exposures, such as new oral contraceptive formulations and increased intrauterine device use, might influence ovarian cancer risk and survival is difficult. Risk factors for ovarian cancer should be evaluated in the context of tumor histotypes, which have unique molecular features and cells of origin; this is a task that requires large collaborative studies to achieve meaningful sample sizes. Importantly, identification of novel modifiable risk factors, in addition to those currently known to reduce risk (eg, childbearing, tubal ligation, oral contraceptive use), is needed; this is not feasibly implemented at a population level. In this Commentary, we describe important gaps in knowledge and propose new approaches to advance epidemiologic research to improve ovarian cancer prevention and survival, including updated classification of tumors, collection of data on changing and novel exposures, longer follow-up on existing studies, evaluation of diverse populations, development of better risk prediction models, and collaborating prospectively with consortia to develop protocols for new studies that will allow seamless integration for future pooled analyses.


Assuntos
Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Viés , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores de Risco
14.
Maturitas ; 95: 42-49, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27889052

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Oral contraceptive pills have been implicated in the pathophysiology of breast cancer. Although many studies have examined the relationship between combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and breast cancer, there is a paucity of literature that discusses progestin-only oral contraceptives (POCs) and breast cancer. The purpose of this investigation is to examine potential associations between different types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer mortality in the South Carolina Medicaid population among different racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Subjects included 4816 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2013. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated to determine time-to-mortality rates among users of oral contraceptives. Competing-risks models and Cox multivariate survival models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer and other-cause mortality, as well as all-cause mortality. RESULTS: POCs were associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.52) and a non-significant increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.52, 2.07). COCs increased the risk of breast cancer mortality (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.28) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.30, 2.57). CONCLUSION: Use of POCs may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer mortality. Due to the small sample size of POC users in the current study, additional research is needed to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Anticoncepcionais Orais/efeitos adversos , Medicaid , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/induzido quimicamente , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
15.
World J Gastroenterol ; 22(27): 6296-317, 2016 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27468219

RESUMO

AIM: Advances in genetics and immunology have contributed to the current understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). METHODS: The current opinion on the pathogenesis of IBD suggests that genetically susceptible individuals develop intolerance to dysregulated gut microflora (dysbiosis) and chronic inflammation develops as a result of environmental insults. Environmental exposures are innumerable with varying effects during the life course of individuals with IBD. Studying the relationship between environmental factors and IBD may provide the missing link to increasing our understanding of the etiology and increased incidence of IBD in recent years with implications for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Environmental factors are heterogeneous and genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, or dysbiosis do not lead to the development of IBD in isolation. RESULTS: Current challenges in the study of environmental factors and IBD are how to effectively translate promising results from experimental studies to humans in order to develop models that incorporate the complex interactions between the environment, genetics, immunology, and gut microbiota, and limited high quality interventional studies assessing the effect of modifying environmental factors on the natural history and patient outcomes in IBD. CONCLUSION: This article critically reviews the current evidence on environmental risk factors for IBD and proposes directions for future research.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Poluição do Ar/estatística & dados numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Aleitamento Materno , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Gorduras na Dieta , Fibras na Dieta , Disbiose/epidemiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Aditivos Alimentares , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Higiene , Hipótese da Higiene , Desenvolvimento Industrial/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções/epidemiologia , Carne , Fatores de Risco , Saneamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Sono , Fumar/epidemiologia , Classe Social , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Vacinas/uso terapêutico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/epidemiologia , Poluição da Água/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Contraception ; 94(2): 160-7, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27036300

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The risk of pregnancy is estimated to be 20 times as high among women who use oral contraception, and 90 times as high among condom users, as among women who use certain long-acting contraceptive methods. We explored the population-level implications of this variation in contraceptive efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: We used the FamilyScape 3.0 microsimulation model to study the effects on the nonmarital pregnancy rate of movements along two different margins of contraceptive behavior: the extensive margin, which captures decisions about whether to initiate use of any method of contraception among noncontraceptors; and the intensive margin, which captures the choice of methods among contraceptors. The model is populated with a nationally representative sample of 50,000 women who are of childbearing age. RESULTS: The impact on the number of nonmarital pregnancies would not be substantially different if noncontraceptors adopted long-acting methods than if they began using oral contraception. Moreover, the nonmarital pregnancy rate would be reduced by about twice as much if a subset of noncontraceptors began using condoms as if an equal number of pill users took up long-acting methods. CONCLUSIONS: The prevailing emphasis on long-acting contraception is somewhat misplaced. Policymakers and practitioners will have the largest effects on fertility outcomes if they can change the behavior of sexually active women who neglect to use birth control when they are not seeking pregnancy. IMPLICATIONS: Women's decisions about which methods to use are less impactful than their decisions about whether to use contraception at all. The policies that affect method choice are likely to differ from the policies that address the underlying motivations of noncontraceptors who are not seeking pregnancy.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26173632

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate the knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of female Romanian university students, as possible future opinion leaders, about contraception and motherhood, by assessing their level of contraceptive use, opinions and knowledge with regard to combined oral contraceptives (COCs). METHODS: A knowledge, attitudes and practice questionnaire was conducted among 1105 female university students aged 19 to 30 years. The participants were recruited from six faculties at universities in Iasi and Arad, Romania. The study protocol was approved by the university ethics committees. Statistical analyses included percentages, χ(2) tests and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Two-thirds of respondents were in a relationship or married. Average age at first sexual intercourse was 18.6 years. Two out of three (69%) students identified themselves as sexually active. The same percentage showed a positive attitude towards contraception and stated that they used it. The most commonly used contraceptive methods were condoms, COCs and withdrawal. The students' perceptions of the benefits and adverse effects of COCs were analysed. Half of the students had heard about extended COC regimens, but only 24% showed interest in using them regularly. A large proportion of pharmacy and non-medical students appeared to have poor knowledge about contraception and reproductive health, which generated misperceptions and negative attitudes. Two-thirds of the participants considered 25 to 29 years to be the optimal age for starting a family, and 85.5% intended to have children in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students, but not pharmacy students, showed higher levels of knowledge. Improvement of students' knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards general contraceptive use, COCs and childbearing is needed. Evidence-based information is required to address poor knowledge about the physiology of reproduction, misconceptions relating to COCs, and the possibility of menstrual suppression using hormonal contraceptive methods. Compulsory reproductive health education for students is desirable.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Comportamento Contraceptivo/psicologia , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez não Desejada/psicologia , Romênia , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estudantes/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Universidades , Adulto Jovem
19.
Hum Reprod ; 30(10): 2364-75, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26311148

RESUMO

STUDY QUESTION: To what extent does oral contraception (OC) impair ovarian reserve parameters in women who seek fertility assessment and counselling to get advice on whether their remaining reproductive lifespan is reduced? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian reserve parameters defined by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume were found to be significantly decreased by 19% (95% CI 9.1-29.3%), 18% (95% CI 11.2-24.8%) and 50% (95% CI 45.1-53.7%) among OC users compared with non-users. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AMH and AFC have proved to be reliable predictors of ovarian ageing. In women, AMH declines with age and data suggest a relationship with remaining reproductive lifespan and age at menopause. OC may alter parameters related to ovarian reserve assessment but the extent of the reduction is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional study of 887 women aged 19-46 attending the Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic (FACC) from 2011 to 2014 comparing ovarian reserve parameters in OC users with non-OC users. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The FAC Clinic was initiated to provide individual fertility assessment and counselling. All women were examined on a random cycle day by a fertility specialist. Consultation included; transvaginal ultrasound (AFC, ovarian volume, pathology), a full reproductive history and AMH measurement. Women were grouped into non-users and users of OC (all combinations of estrogen-progestin products and the contraceptive vaginal ring). Non-users included women with an intrauterine device (IUD) or no hormonal contraception. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 887 women, 244 (27.5%) used OC. In a linear regression analyses adjusted for age, ovarian volume was 50% lower (95% CI 45.1-53.7%), AMH was 19% lower (95% CI 9.1-29.3%), and AFC was 18% lower (95% CI 11.2-24.8%) in OC users compared with non-users. Comparison of AMH at values of <10 pmol/l OC was found to have a significant negative influence on AMH (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1; 2.4, P = 0.03). Furthermore, we found a significant decrease in antral follicles sized 5-7 mm (P < 0.001) and antral follicles sized 8-10 mm (P < 0.001) but an increase in antral follicles sized 2-4 mm (P = 0.008) among OC users. The two groups (OC users versus non-users) were comparable regarding age, BMI, smoking and maternal age at menopause. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The study population comprised women attending the FAC Clinic. Recruitment was based on self-referral, which could imply a potential selection bias. Ovarian reserve was examined at a random cycle day. However, both AMH and AFC can be assessed independently of the menstrual cycle. The accuracy in predicting residual reproductive lifespan is still needed in both users and non-users of OC. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: OC has a major impact on the ovarian volume, and a moderate impact on AFC and AMH with a shift towards the smaller sized antral follicle subclasses. The most evident reduction occurs in the antral follicles of 5-7 and 8-10 mm with the highest number of AMH secreting granulosa cells. It is essential to be aware of the impact of OC use on ovarian reserve parameters when guiding OC users on their fertility status and reproductive lifespan. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The FAC Clinic was established in 2011 as part of the ReproHigh collaboration. This study received funding through the Capital Region Research Fund and by EU-regional funding. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The biobank connected to FAC Clinic is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee (H-1-2011-081).


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Folículo Ovariano/patologia , Reserva Ovariana/efeitos dos fármacos , Ovário/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Envelhecimento , Hormônio Antimülleriano/metabolismo , Anticoncepção , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ovário/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodução , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
20.
Womens Health Issues ; 25(6): 622-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26253826

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine rural/urban differences in postpartum contraceptive use, which are underexplored in the literature. METHODS: We analyzed phase 5 (2004-2008) of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and weighted multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association between self-reported postpartum contraceptive method and rural/urban residence among postpartum women not desiring pregnancy (n = 6,468). RESULTS: Postpartum (mean, 16.5 weeks after delivery), 14.4% of respondents were using sterilization, 6.7% long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), 37.3% moderately effective hormonal methods, 38.4% less effective methods or no method, and 3.2% abstinence. Multivariable analysis yielded sporadic geographic patterns. Odds of method use varied significantly by age, parity, body mass index, and breastfeeding status. Not discussing contraception with a prenatal healthcare provider decreased odds of postpartum LARC use (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75). Number of prenatal visits and weeks since delivery were not associated with postpartum contraception method. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe strong variation in postpartum contraceptive use based on geography. Low uptake of highly effective contraception across rural and urban areas suggests a need for education and outreach regarding these methods.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Parto , Adulto , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/uso terapêutico , Dispositivos Anticoncepcionais Femininos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Michigan , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , População Rural , Esterilização Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Urbana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA