Simultaneous quantification of 11 antiepileptic drugs using limited isotope-labeled internal standards in LC-MS/MS: An accuracy assessment.

This study aims to establish an LC-MS/MS method to simultaneously analyze 11 antiepileptic drugs with a particular focus on maintaining accuracy while reducing the number of isotope-labeled internal standards employed for cost-effectiveness. By applying a water/acetonitrile gradient elution containing 0.1 % formic acid and 2 mM ammonium formate as the mobile phase, optimal sensitivity for the target drugs could be obtained in positive ESI mode in LC-MS/MS. After optimizing various extraction techniques, extraction with 70 % acetonitrile was selected as it provided good recoveries (>93 %) for all targets without matrix effects. Accuracies within 3 % were achieved from the combination of six internal standards, while accuracies of 5 % and 10 % were obtained by reducing the number of internal standards to four and two, respectively, for more economical analysis. The accuracy of the established method was maintained in hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperalbuminemia sera, suggesting that it can be successfully applied to individual serum samples with various properties.

Assessment of Antiepileptic Drug Concentrations in HIV-Infected versus HIV-Negative Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: A higher rate of subtherapeutic psychotropic drug concentrations was recently found in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients. In this study, we sought to investigate if this trend could also apply to antiepileptic drugs. METHODS: Overall, 700 HIV-infected patients were screened during the first 2 years after the introduction of our outpatient polytherapy management service (Gestione Ambulatoriale Politerapie [GAP]) in the search for subjects with antiepileptic drug trough concentration assessments. The distribution of such concentrations was compared with that in HIV-negative patients monitored over the same period. RESULTS: The search identified 97 HIV-infected patients concomitantly receiving antiretroviral and antiepileptic drugs, for a total of 310 drug measurements. Overall, 30%, 64% and 6%, versus 28%, 65% and 7%, of the antiepileptic concentrations measured in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients (1090 patients, for a total of 3488 antiepileptic concentrations measured) were below, within, or above the therapeutic targets, respectively. The antiepileptic drug valproate was associated with the highest risk of subtherapeutic drug concentrations, with 57% and 46% of determinations below the therapeutic range in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, respectively. Remarkably, the concentrations of valproate were significantly lower in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients (47.9 ± 21.2 versus 53.9 ± 21.6 mg/L; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our retrospective study, most HIV-infected patients had antiepileptic drug concentrations falling within the therapeutic targets, with the exception of valproate, which was associated with a higher rate of subtherapeutic concentrations compared with other antiepileptic drugs.

AntiEpileptic drug Monitoring in PREgnancy (EMPiRE): a double-blind randomised trial on effectiveness and acceptability of monitoring strategies.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may experience a reduction in serum AED levels. This has the potential to worsen seizure control. OBJECTIVE: To determine if, in pregnant women with epilepsy on AEDs, additional therapeutic drug monitoring reduces seizure deterioration compared with clinical features monitoring after a reduction in serum AED levels. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised trial nested within a cohort study was conducted and a qualitative study of acceptability of the two strategies was undertaken. Stratified block randomisation with a 1 : 1 allocation method was carried out. SETTING: Fifty obstetric and epilepsy clinics in secondary and tertiary care units in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women with epilepsy on one or more of the following AEDs: lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin or levetiracetam. Women with a ≥ 25% decrease in serum AED level from baseline were randomised to therapeutic drug monitoring or clinical features monitoring strategies. INTERVENTIONS: In the therapeutic drug monitoring group, clinicians had access to clinical findings and monthly serum AED levels to guide AED dosage adjustment for seizure control. In the clinical features monitoring group, AED dosage adjustment was based only on clinical features. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome - seizure deterioration, defined as time to first seizure and to all seizures after randomisation per woman until 6 weeks post partum. Secondary outcomes - pregnancy complications in mother and offspring, maternal quality of life, seizure rates in cohorts with stable serum AED level, AED dose exposure and adverse events related to AEDs. ANALYSIS: Analysis of time to first and to all seizures after randomisation was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariate failure time analysis by the Andersen-Gill model. The effects were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 130 women were randomised to the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 133 to the clinical features monitoring group; 294 women did not have a reduction in serum AED level. A total of 127 women in the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 130 women in the clinical features monitoring group (98% of complete data) were included in the primary analysis. There were no significant differences in the time to first seizure (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.2) or timing of all seizures after randomisation (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5) between both trial groups. In comparison with the group with stable serum AED levels, there were no significant increases in seizures in the clinical features monitoring (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.5) or therapeutic drug monitoring group (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.5) associated with a reduction in serum AED levels. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups, except for higher cord blood levels of lamotrigine (MD 0.55 mg/l, 95% CI 0.11 to 1 mg/l) or levetiracetam (MD 7.8 mg/l, 95% CI 0.86 to 14.8 mg/l) in the therapeutic drug monitoring group than in the clinical features monitoring group. There were no differences between the groups on daily AED exposure or quality of life. An increase in exposure to lamotrigine, levetiracetam and carbamazepine significantly increased the cord blood levels of the AEDs, but not maternal or fetal complications. Women with epilepsy perceived the need for weighing up their increased vulnerability to seizures during pregnancy against the side effects of AEDs. LIMITATIONS: Fewer women than the original target were recruited. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to suggest that regular monitoring of serum AED levels in pregnancy improves seizure control or affects maternal or fetal outcomes. FUTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS: Further evaluation of the risks of seizure deterioration for various threshold levels of reduction in AEDs and the long-term neurodevelopment of infants born to mothers in both randomised groups is needed. An individualised prediction model will help to identify those women who need close monitoring in pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01253916. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 23. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

A population pharmacokinetic model taking into account protein binding for the sustained-release granule formulation of valproic acid in children with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for a prolonged-release granule formulation of valproic acid (VPA) in children with epilepsy and to determine the doses providing a VPA trough concentration (Ctrough) within the target range (50-100 mg/L). METHODS: Ninety-eight children (1-17.6 years, 325 plasma samples) were included in the study. The model was built with NONMEM 7.3. The probability to obtain Ctrough between 50 and 100 mg/L was determined by the Monte Carlo simulations for doses of 20, 30, 40, and 60 mg/kg/day and body weights between 10 and 70 kg. RESULTS: A one compartment model, with first-order absorption and flip-flop parameterization and linear elimination, but taking protein binding into account, was used to describe the data. Typical values for unbound VPA clearance and distribution volume were 6.24 L/h/70 kg and 130 L/h/70 kg respectively. Both parameters were related to body weight via allometric models. The highest probability to obtain a Ctrough within the target range for 10-kg children was obtained with a 40 mg/kg daily dose, whereas daily doses of 30 and 20 mg/kg were found appropriate for 20 to 30- and ≥ 40-kg children respectively. However, for these same doses, the exposure to unbound VPA could differ by 40%. CONCLUSIONS: If the present study supports the current dose recommendations of 20-30 mg/kg/day, except for children under 20 kg, who may need higher doses, it also highlights the need for further research on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic profile of unbound VPA.

Assessment of the correlations of lacosamide concentrations in saliva and serum in patients with epilepsy.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs is based on patient serum samples. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between lacosamide (LCM) steady state concentrations in serum and saliva samples. Additionally, we investigated the relation with daily dose, and assessed the feasibility of saliva collection. This was an open-label, single center study including data from 25 patients at the Bethel Epilepsy Center treated with LCM (50-650 mg/d). Samples were collected in the morning (fasting values) and in selected cases at 50 minutes to 5 hours after the morning dose. Nonsignificant differences in the mean LCM morning (trough) concentration in serum and saliva were observed. Serum and saliva concentrations across all samples were highly correlated, (r = .874), with a slightly lower correlation when only fasting values were analyzed (r = .860). Higher correlation with daily dosages was observed in serum samples (r = .773) than in saliva samples (r = .604). Serum and saliva concentrations increased significantly after intake of the LCM morning dose (P < .001). The median absolute and percentage increase of LCM in serum were moderately lower than in saliva samples, with a few outliers in saliva samples. Consequently, saliva could offer great clinical potential to monitor drug concentrations and guide LCM treatment in epileptic patients.

Population pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine and its monohydroxy derivative in epileptic children.

AIMS: Oxcarbazepine is an antiepileptic drug with an activity mostly due to its monohydroxy derivative metabolite (MHD). A parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetic model in children was developed to evaluate the consistency between the recommended paediatric doses and the reference range for trough concentration (Ctrough ) of MHD (3-35 mg l-1 ). METHODS: A total of 279 plasma samples were obtained from 31 epileptic children (age 2-12 years) after a single dose of oxcarbazepine. Concentration-time data were analysed with Monolix 4.3.2. The probability to obtain Ctrough between 3-35 mg l-1 was determined by Monte Carlo simulations for doses ranging from 10 to 90 mg kg-1  day-1 . RESULTS: A parent-metabolite model with two compartments for oxcarbazepine and one compartment for MHD best described the data. Typical values for oxcarbazepine clearance, central and peripheral distribution volume and distribution clearance were 140 l h-1  70 kg-1 , 337 l 70 kg-1 , 60.7 l and 62.5 l h-1 , respectively. Typical values for MHD clearance and distribution volume were 4.11 l h-1  70 kg-1 and 54.8 l 70 kg-1 respectively. Clearances and distribution volumes of oxcarbazepine and MHD were related to body weight via empirical allometric models. Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) increased MHD clearance by 29.3%. Fifty-kg children without EIAEDs may need 20-30 mg kg-1  day-1 instead of the recommended target maintenance dose (30-45 mg kg-1  day-1 ) to obtain Ctrough within the reference range. By contrast, 10-kg children with EIAEDs would need 90 mg kg-1  day-1 instead of the maximum recommended dose of 60 mg kg-1  day-1 . CONCLUSION: This population pharmacokinetic model of oxcarbazepine supports current dose recommendations, except for 10-kg children with concomitant EIAEDs and 50-kg children without EIAEDs.

Bioequivalence Between Generic and Branded Lamotrigine in People With Epilepsy: The EQUIGEN Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Switching between generic antiepileptic drugs is a highly debated issue that affects both clinical care and overall health care costs. Objective: To evaluate the single-dose pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of 3 (1 branded and 2 generic drugs) on-market, immediate-release lamotrigine drug products. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Equivalence Among Antiepileptic Drug Generic and Brand Products in People With Epilepsy (EQUIGEN) single-dose study is a crossover, prospective, sequence-randomized, replicate pharmacokinetic study conducted at 5 US academic epilepsy centers. Fifty adults (≥18 years) with epilepsy who were taking concomitant antiepileptic drugs and not currently receiving lamotrigine were enrolled between July 18, 2013, and January 19, 2015. Every participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 3 equivalent sequences, each comprising 6 study periods, during which they had blood draws before and after medication administration. Forty-nine participants were included in intention-to-treat analyses. Interventions: Participants received a single 25-mg dose of immediate-release lamotrigine at the start of each period, with the branded and the 2 most disparate generic products each studied twice. Lamotrigine was selected as the antiepileptic drug of interest because of its wide use, publications indicating problems with generic switches, and complaints to the US Food and Drug Administration regarding generic products. Both participants and study personnel were blinded to the specific generic products selected. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was bioequivalence between products. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were compared, and average bioequivalence (ABE) was established if the 90% CIs of the ratios of the 2 products were within equivalence limits (80%-125%). Results: Of the 50 randomized participants, 49 (98%) received all 3 lamotrigine products and completed at least 3 pharmacokinetic assessments and 46 (92%) completed all 6 pharmacokinetic assessments. Among the 49 participants, 28 (57%) were men and 21 (43%) were women, 42 (86%) self-identified as white, and 46 (16) years was the mean (SD) age. The 3 drug products were considered bioequivalent because the 90% CIs were within equivalence limits (lowest and highest CI limits for Cmax, 92.6% and 110.4%; for AUC0-96, 96.9% and 101.9%). Replicate testing demonstrated no significant differences in within-subject variability across the 3 products (likelihood ratios, χ22 for log-transformed variables: AUC0-96, 2.58; Cmax, 0.64; and AUC0-∞, 4.05; P ≥ .13) and that the 3 products were also bioequivalent according to scaled ABE and individual bioequivalence criteria with no subject × formulation interaction (Cmax, 0.00; AUC0-96, 0.54; and AUC0-∞, 0.36; P ≥ .76). Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence that the disparate lamotrigine products studied are bioequivalent when tested in people with epilepsy taking concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01733394.

A simple and cost-effective HPLC-UV method for the detection of levetiracetam in plasma/serum of patients with epilepsy.

A simple, fast and cost-effective method was developed and validated for the determination of levetiracetam (LEV) in plasma/serum of patients using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection. The stability of LEV plasma/serum samples over time and in different blood collection tubes was evaluated. Serum/plasma samples were deproteinized by methanol spiked with the internal standard, gabapentin. HPLC was carried out on a Venusil XBP C18 , 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm column, at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and with mobile phase consisting of 50 mm potassium dihydrogen phosphate-acetonitrile at a pH of 5.5. The UV detector was set at 205 nm and 10 µL was injected. Total runtime was 15 min. Calibration curves were linear (correlation coefficient = 0.999) over a concentration range of 1-60 µg/mL. Relative standard deviation values for both the inter-day and intra-day precision and accuracy were <5% for the concentration range. The influence of different collection tubes and the effect of time on the stability of LEV was investigated. These factors may cause inaccuracies owing to drug-protein binding and interference in the matrix. This method is simple, fast, cost-effective, reliable and accurate with minimal sample preparation for daily routine use in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Intrapatient variation in antiepileptic drug plasma concentration after generic substitution vs stable brand-name drug regimens.

Generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is still a matter of controversy and concern among clinicians and patients. We aimed to assess intrasubject variation in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) after generic substitution compared with a stable brand-name drug regimen in a population of patients with epilepsy. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected and stored data from our therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database for the years 2009-2014. The main outcome variable was the proportion of patients who, after switching from branded to generic formulations, showed a greater than ±20% change in AED plasma concentrations compared to the proportion of control patients showing a change in AED plasma concentrations of the same extent while receiving stable branded formulations over repeated TDM tests. Fifty patients on LTG, 27 on LEV and 16 on TPM showing at least one TDM test while receiving generic products fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the analysis and were compared with 200 control patients for LTG, 120 for LEV and 80 for TPM. The proportion of patients showing an intrasubject change greater than ±20% in AED plasma concentrations was similar in the brand name vs generic group compared with the control one for LTG (22% vs 33%) and LEV (44% vs 38%), while it was higher in the control group for TPM (41% vs 6%, p<0.01). These are the first data in the literature about the within-patient variation in steady-state plasma concentrations of a series of stable treatments with brand-name AEDs in a real clinical setting. In conclusion, a significant interday variability in intrapatient LTG, LEV and TPM plasma concentrations can be observed even in patients stabilized with the same brand name product over time. This suggests that any change in plasma AED concentration and possible related clinical effects after generic substitution may be not necessarily related to the switch. Our results should be confirmed by large, prospective, blinded, randomized controlled studies in people with epilepsy.

Free phenytoin assessment in patients: measured versus calculated blood serum levels.

BACKGROUND: Total serum drug levels are routinely determined for the therapeutic drug monitoring of selected, difficult-to-dose drugs. For some of these drugs, however, knowledge of the free fraction is necessary to adapt correct dosing. Phenytoin, with its non-linear pharmacokinetics, >90 % albumin binding and slow elimination rate, is such a drug requiring individualization in patients, especially if rapid intravenous loading and subsequent dose adaptation is needed. In a prior long-term investigation, we showed the excellent performance of pharmacy-assisted Bayesian forecasting support for optimal dosing in hospitalized patients treated with phenytoin. In a subgroup analysis, we evaluated the suitability of the Sheiner-Tozer algorithm to calculate the free phenytoin fraction in hypoalbuminemic patients. OBJECTIVE: To test the usefulness of the Sheiner-Tozer algorithm for the correct estimation of the free phenytoin concentrations in hospitalized patients. SETTING: A Swiss tertiary care hospital. METHOD: Free phenytoin plasma concentration was calculated from total phenytoin concentration in hypoalbuminemic patients and compared with the measured free phenytoin. The patients were separated into a low (35 ≤ albumin ≥ 25 g/L) and a very low group (albumin <25 g/L) for comparing and statistically analyzing the calculated and the measured free phenytoin concentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Calculated and the measured free phenytoin concentration. RESULTS: The calculated (1.2 mg/L (SD = 0.7) and the measured (1.1 mg/L (SD = 0.5) free phenytoin concentration correlated. The mean difference in the low and the very low albumin group was: 0.10 mg/L (SD = 1.4) (n = 11) and 0.13 mg/L (SD = 0.24) (n = 12), respectively. Although the variability of the data could be a bias, no statistically significant difference between the groups was found: t test (p = 0.78), the Passing-Bablok regression, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of r = 0.907 and p = 0.00. The Bland-Altman plot including the regression analysis revealed no systematic differences between the calculated and the measured value [M = 0.11 (SD = 0.28)]. CONCLUSION: In absence of a free phenytoin plasma concentration measurement also in hypoalbuminemic patients, the Sheiner-Tozer algorithm represents a useful tool to assist therapeutic monitoring to calculate or control free phenytoin by using total phenytoin and the albumin concentration.

[Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valproic Acid in Children: A Prospective Study of The Effect of The Compliance and The Economic Level on the Trough Plasmatic Concentrations and Epileptic Seizures]. / Suivi thérapeutique de l'acide valproïque chez l'enfant : étude prospective de l'effet de l'observance et du niveau économique sur les concentrations plasmatiques résiduelles et les crises épileptiques.

INTRODUCTION: Valproic acid (VA) is a widely used antiepileptic drug. Because of its pharmacokinetic variability and the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors such as the treatment compliance, VA therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended in children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of treatment compliance and the economic level on VA tough plasmatic concentration (TPC) and epileptic rhythm in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A one-year prospective study (August 2008-August 2009) concerning children (age≤5 years) regularly treated by VA who had a VA TDM. So, 276 plasmatic samples from 238 children were collected. The children were divided in two groups as following: the group 1 (G1) presenting a good compliance and a reliable questioning and the group 2 (G2) presenting a bad compliance and a non reliable questioning. We evaluated the interindividual variability by correlating the TPC to the dose. Then, we divided the hole group in function of their economic levels (low-medium-high). RESULTS: Sex ratio male/female was 1.3. Median age was 5 years+/-3,9. The mean TPC was 62 µg/mL [0.12-131 µg/mL]. VA TPC were in the therapeutic range (TR) in 62%. Adverse drug reactions were noted in 4.2% of the children. G1 represented 70% of the children and G2, 30%. The TPC were in the TR in 67% of G1 and 51% of G2 (p=0.02). There was a significant difference between the TPC in G1 and G2 (p=0.02).There was no significative difference in the TPC in function of the economic levels. There was no correlation between TPC and the administered doses. The epileptic seizures were more spaced in children with therapeutic TPC than those with TPC in the TR (p=0.002) and in G1 than in G2 (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance should be appropriate in order to optimize the TDM rule. A good compliance and a therapeutic TPC allow a better control of epileptic seizures.

The benefits of antiepileptic drug (AED) blood level monitoring to complement clinical management of people with epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: Some argue that there is no evidence to support the use of antiepileptic drug (AED) blood level monitoring when treating people with epilepsy (PWE). This paper identifies how AED monitoring can be invaluable in such treatment. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES: (i) Compliance: Antiepileptic drug blood levels often confirm noncompliance rather than adequate seizure control, confirming subtherapeutic levels in PWE attending hospitals due to seizures. Routine monitoring of AED levels may prevent breakthrough seizures by identifying noncompliance and instituting heightened compliance measures before experiencing breakthrough seizures without modifying dosages. For PWE attending hospitals due to seizures, loading with the AED shown to be subtherapeutic may be all that is required. (ii) Cluster seizures and status epilepticus: When using long-acting AEDs to complement benzodiazepines, blood level monitoring confirms that an adequate dosage was given and, if not, a further bolus can be administered with further monitoring. This is particularly useful when using rectal administration of AEDs. (iii) Polypharmacy: Polypharmacy provokes drug interactions in which case AED monitoring helps in differentiating adequate dosing, offending AED with toxicity and free level measuring benefits when total levels are unhelpful. (iv) Generic substitution: Generic AEDs can fluctuate considerably from a parent compound, and even a parent compound, sourced from an alternative supplier, may have altered bioavailability for which blood level monitoring is very useful. CONCLUSIONS: While therapeutic blood level monitoring is not a substitute for good clinical judgment, it offers a valuable adjunct to patient care.

Bioluminescent sensor proteins for point-of-care therapeutic drug monitoring.

For many drugs, finding the balance between efficacy and toxicity requires monitoring their concentrations in the patient's blood. Quantifying drug levels at the bedside or at home would have advantages in terms of therapeutic outcome and convenience, but current techniques require the setting of a diagnostic laboratory. We have developed semisynthetic bioluminescent sensors that permit precise measurements of drug concentrations in patient samples by spotting minimal volumes on paper and recording the signal using a simple point-and-shoot camera. Our sensors have a modular design consisting of a protein-based and a synthetic part and can be engineered to selectively recognize a wide range of drugs, including immunosuppressants, antiepileptics, anticancer agents and antiarrhythmics. This low-cost point-of-care method could make therapies safer, increase the convenience of doctors and patients and make therapeutic drug monitoring available in regions with poor infrastructure.

Assessment of pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intranasal diazepam relative to rectal gel in healthy adults.

Diazepam rectal gel (RG) is currently the only approved rescue therapy for outpatient management of seizure clusters in the United States. There is an unmet medical need for an alternative rescue therapy for seizure clusters that is effective, and more convenient to administer with a socially acceptable method of delivery. An intranasal diazepam formulation has been developed, and this study evaluates the tolerability and bioavailability of diazepam nasal spray (NS) relative to an equivalent dose of diazepam-RG in healthy adults. Twenty-four healthy adults were enrolled in a phase 1, open-label, 3-period crossover study. Plasma diazepam and metabolite concentrations were measured by serial sampling. Dose proportionality for 5- and 20-mg intranasal doses and the bioavailability of 20mg diazepam-NS relative to 20mg diazepam-RG were assessed by maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and systemic exposure parameters (AUC0-∞ and AUC0-24). The mean Cmax values for 20mg diazepam-NS and 20mg diazepam-RG were 378 ± 106 and 328 ± 152 ng/mL, achieved at 1.0 and 1.5h, respectively. Subjects administered intranasal and rectal gel formulations experienced nasal and rectal leakage, respectively. Diazepam absorption following intranasal administration was consistent but 3 subjects with diazepam-RG had low plasma drug levels at the earliest assessment of 5 min, due to poor retention, and were excluded from analysis. Excluding them, the treatment ratios (20mg diazepam-NS:20mg diazepam-RG) and 90% confidence intervals for diazepam Cmax and AUC0-24 were 0.98 (0.85-1.14) and 0.89 (0.80-0.98), respectively, suggesting that the bioavailability was comparable between the two formulations. Dose proportionality was observed between the lowest and highest dose-strengths of intranasal formulation. Both intranasal and rectal treatments were well tolerated with mild to moderate adverse events. Results suggest that a single-dose of 20mg diazepam-NS is tolerable and comparable in bioavailability to that of diazepam-RG. The intranasal formulation may provide caregivers and patients with a more socially acceptable and convenient alternative rescue therapy in the acute treatment of seizure clusters.

Approvable generic carbamazepine formulations may not be bioequivalent in target patient populations.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that with carbamazepine (CBZ), positive results of bioequivalence trials in healthy volunteers cannot be extrapolated to patients because metabolic enzyme induction fundamentally changes the pharmacokinetics of CBZ. METHODS: Bioequivalence trials were simulated assuming normal and induced metabolic clearance. The relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were drawn from published studies. RESULTS: The Cmax ratio depends on the clearance. A generic product which is fully compliant with the regulatory requirements in healthy volunteers could be non-bioequivalent in patients with enhanced elimination. CONCLUSION: A statement of bioequivalence of CBZ formulations, based on a single-dose study performed in healthy subjects, may not hold for a target patient population in the steady state.

Adherence to antiepileptic medicines in children: a multiple-methods assessment involving dried blood spot sampling.

PURPOSE: To evaluate adherence to prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in children with epilepsy using a combination of adherence-assessment methods. METHODS: A total of 100 children with epilepsy (≤17 years old) were recruited. Medication adherence was determined via parental and child self-reporting (≥9 years old), medication refill data from general practitioner (GP) prescribing records, and via AED concentrations in dried blood spot (DBS) samples obtained from children at the clinic and via self- or parental-led sampling in children's own homes. The latter were assessed using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Patients were deemed nonadherent if any of these measures were indicative of nonadherence with the prescribed treatment. In addition, beliefs about medicines, parental confidence in seizure management, and the presence of depressed mood in parents were evaluated to examine their association with nonadherence in the participating children. KEY FINDINGS: The overall rate of nonadherence in children with epilepsy was 33%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that children with generalized epilepsy (vs. focal epilepsy) were more likely (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-15.81) to be classified as nonadherent as were children whose parents have depressed mood (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.16-11.41). SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to apply the novel methodology of determining adherence via AED concentrations in clinic and home DBS samples. The present findings show that the latter, with further development, could be a useful approach to adherence assessment when combined with other measures including parent and child self-reporting. Seizure type and parental depressed mood were strongly predictive of nonadherence.

Pharmacokinetic simulation of fatal carbamazepine intoxication in 23-month old child following phenytoin discontinuation.

The antiepileptic, carbamazepine, is extensively metabolized via hepatic enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family and is therefore subject to a myriad of drug interactions. Concomitant administration with phenytoin enhances carbamazepine metabolism thus reducing serum concentrations and necessitating the use of a higher maintenance dose. Removal of phenytoin therapy in the absence of anticipatory dose adjustments and careful monitoring of serum concentrations may result in catastrophic outcomes. Reported herein are the events leading to the death of a 23-month old child who suffered a fatal carbamazepine overdose following withdrawal of phenytoin therapy.

Practices associated with serum antiepileptic drug level monitoring at a pediatric neurology clinic: a Malaysian experience.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the practices associated with the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the management of children with structural-metabolic epilepsy. METHODS: It was a retrospective chart review and included children aged ≥2 years old with structural-metabolic epilepsy, treated with AEDs, and received TDM. The data were extracted from the medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were identified with 50 TDM assays. In two thirds of the assays, "check level" and "recheck level" were the reasons behind the requesting of serum level monitoring of AEDs. Knowledge of serum AED levels led to alterations in the management in 60% of the assays. Thirty-two (76%) pediatrician's actions were consistent with the recommendation of TDM pharmacist. Forty-nine (98%) levels were appropriately indicated. In relation to the appropriateness of sampling time, 9 (18%) levels were not assessed due to missing data. Twenty-seven (54%) levels were appropriately sampled. CONCLUSIONS: More studies should be designed to improve the component of the current TDM request form, especially in the reason section. By the same token, the number of pointless assays and the costs to the health care system can be reduced both by enhancing and improving the educational standards of the requesting neurologists.

Cost-effectiveness analysis for the use of serum antiepileptic drug level monitoring in children diagnosed with structural-metabolic epilepsy.

Treatment with antiepileptic drugs is commonly guided by serum level monitoring. Such monitoring requires expensive laboratory equipment and products. However, well-conducted studies on the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring for antiepileptic drugs are lacking particularly in patients with structural-metabolic epilepsy. The study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of serum level monitoring services in the management of children with structural-metabolic epilepsy during the first year of diagnosis. A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the provider perspective. It included patients attended a paediatric neurology clinic. The effectiveness measures used in this analysis were the number of patients that achieved ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, and the number of patients with 3-month seizure free. Medical records of the patients were reviewed for the required information. Medical chart/billing data obtained from the hospital were collected to estimate the resources used (One Malaysian Ringgit MYR is equivalent to 0.31 USD). The recruited children were followed for one year following their first visit. The average cost effectiveness ratio for the monitored patients (MYR 2735 per patient that achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) was lower than that for non-monitored patients (MYR 2921 per patients that achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of MYR 2357 per one additional patient that achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. The average cost effectiveness ratios for monitored and non-monitored group were MYR 8279 and MYR 6433 per patient with a 3-month seizure-free period, respectively, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of MYR 29,666 per one additional patient with a 3-month seizure-free period. In terms of the effectiveness measures used, serum level monitoring of antiepileptic drugs was found to be cost-effective. However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was found to be sensitive to the cost of management.