Ethambutol and visual assessment in England: current practice and recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for tuberculosis (TB) in children and adults includes an initial two-month course of ethambutol, a drug that in rare cases can cause optic neuropathy and irreversible vision loss. There is a lack of clear guidance on what vision assessments are needed before and during treatment with ethambutol, with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, British National Formulary and British Thoracic Society offering different guidance. We aimed to assess how vision is routinely tested in patients treated with ethambutol in TB services across England. METHODS: An online survey developed by Public Health England was sent to all TB services in England in 2018 to assess current practice and inform the development of best practice recommendations for visual assessment of patients treated with ethambutol for TB. RESULTS: Sixty-six TB professionals from across England responded, a response rate of 54%. The results showed variations in practice, including when to omit ethambutol from treatment, the timing and frequency of visual assessment, the type of visual assessment, referral processes and management of visual changes. CONCLUSION: This national survey highlights the need for clear guidelines on the testing of vision for patients taking ethambutol at recommended doses, before and during treatment. We suggest a pragmatic approach to visual assessment to reduce variation in practice, proposing a stepwise pathway for patients on standard TB treatment for local adaptation.

Relationship between common telomere length-related genetic variations, telomere length, and risk of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in Chinese Han population: As assessed for causality using the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.

Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH) is a significant threat to tuberculosis control, and two recent studies indicated that leukocyte telomere length (LTL) might be a potential biomarker for ATDH. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between common telomere length-related genetic variations, LTL, and risk of ATDH in Eastern Chinese antituberculosis treatment patients. A 1:4 matched case-control study was conducted among 79 ATDH cases assessed for causality using the updated RUCAM and 316 controls. LTL was determined by quantitative real-time PCR, and nine SNPs involved in telomere biology reported by previous GWAS were assessed. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between genotypes and risk of ATDH with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The average RUCAM score of cases was 7.1. The average LTL in cases was significantly shorter than that in controls (median = 1.239 vs. 1.481, P = 0.032). Differences in the distribution of LTL were statistically significant among three genotypes of SNP rs2736098 (CC vs. CT vs. TT, median = 1.544 vs. 1.356 vs. 1.337, P = 0.026) and rs2853677 (AA vs. AG vs. GG, median = 1.511 vs. 1.544 vs. 1.159, P = 0.005) in TERT. SNP rs7675998 in NAF1 was statistically associated with the risk of ATDH under the dominant model (adjusted OR = 1.725, 95% CI: 1.021-2.913, P = 0.042). This is the first study to investigate the relationship of LTL, common telomere length-related variations, and risk of ATDH. SNP rs2736098 and rs2853677 in TERT were significantly associated with LTL, and SNP rs7675998 in NAF1 may be associated with ATDH in Chinese population.

Assessment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patient's skin drug reaction in Zanzibar: A certain causal relationship with Clofazimine.

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a serious public health of concern. We present the management of multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB with skin reaction in Zanzibar in a patient who had prior exposure to anti-TB drugs. The reaction developed 4 months later, following MDR-TB treatment, stopped when the drug was withdrawn, and reappeared when reintroduced. Close monitoring is important in managing DR-TB cases, and an active DR-TB safety, monitoring, and management is required to detect, monitor, and manage adverse events timely.

Serious adverse drug reactions in sub-Saharan Africa in the era of antiretroviral treatment: A systematic review.

We aimed to summarize and describe the burden of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in the era of antiretroviral therapy. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Africa-Wide Information, Scopus, and Web of Science, without language restriction up to March 2021. We hand-searched reference lists, conference abstracts, and dissertation databases. We included studies reporting proportions of admissions attributed to ADRs, admissions prolonged by ADRs, or in-hospital deaths attributed to ADRs. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, reviewed the study quality using a previously published tool, and extracted the data. We tested for heterogeneity using I2 -statistics and summarized the study results using medians and interquartile ranges. Subgroup analyses summarized the results by study quality, setting, methodology, and population. From 1005 unique references identified, we included 15 studies. Median study quality was 7/10; heterogeneity was very high. Median [IQR] proportion of admissions attributed to ADRs was 4.8% [1.5% to 7.0%] (14 studies) and 6.4% [4.0% to 8.4%] in nine active surveillance studies in adults. Two pediatric studies reported the proportion of admissions prolonged by ADRs (0.29% and 0.99%). Three studies reported the proportion of in-hospital deaths attributed to ADRs (2.5%, 13%, and 16%). Antiretroviral and antituberculosis drugs were often implicated in serious ADRs. Evidence of the burden of serious ADRs in SSA is patchy and heterogeneous. A few high-quality studies suggest that the burden is considerable, and that it reflects the regional impact of the HIV pandemic. Further characterization of this burden is required, ideally in studies of standardized methodology.

Economic and modeling evidence for tuberculosis preventive therapy among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the strongest known risk factor for tuberculosis (TB) through its impairment of T-cell immunity. Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is recommended for people living with HIV (PLHIV) by the World Health Organization, as it significantly reduces the risk of developing TB disease. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of modeling studies to summarize projected costs, risks, benefits, and impacts of TPT use among PLHIV on TB-related outcomes. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science from inception until December 31, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts; extracted data; and assessed quality. Extracted data were summarized using descriptive analysis. We performed quantile regression and random effects meta-analysis to describe trends in cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness outcomes across studies and identified key determinants of these outcomes. Our search identified 6,615 titles; 61 full texts were included in the final review. Of the 61 included studies, 31 reported both cost and effectiveness outcomes. A total of 41 were set in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while 12 were set in high-income countries (HICs); 2 were set in both. Most studies considered isoniazid (INH)-based regimens 6 to 2 months long (n = 45), or longer than 12 months (n = 11). Model parameters and assumptions varied widely between studies. Despite this, all studies found that providing TPT to PLHIV was predicted to be effective at averting TB disease. No TPT regimen was substantially more effective at averting TB disease than any other. The cost of providing TPT and subsequent downstream costs (e.g. post-TPT health systems costs) were estimated to be less than $1,500 (2020 USD) per person in 85% of studies that reported cost outcomes (n = 36), regardless of study setting. All cost-effectiveness analyses concluded that providing TPT to PLHIV was potentially cost-effective compared to not providing TPT. In quantitative analyses, country income classification, consideration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) use, and TPT regimen use significantly impacted cost-effectiveness. Studies evaluating TPT in HICs suggested that TPT may be more effective at preventing TB disease than studies evaluating TPT in LMICs; pooled incremental net monetary benefit, given a willingness-to-pay threshold of country-level per capita gross domestic product (GDP), was $271 in LMICs (95% confidence interval [CI] -$81 to $622, p = 0.12) and was $2,568 in HICs (-$32,115 to $37,251, p = 0.52). Similarly, TPT appeared to be more effective at averting TB disease in HICs; pooled percent reduction in active TB incidence was 20% (13% to 27%, p < 0.001) in LMICs and 37% (-34% to 100%, p = 0.13) in HICs. Key limitations of this review included the heterogeneity of input parameters and assumptions from included studies, which limited pooling of effect estimates, inconsistent reporting of model parameters, which limited sample sizes of quantitative analyses, and database bias toward English publications. CONCLUSIONS: The body of literature related to modeling TPT among PLHIV is large and heterogeneous, making comparisons across studies difficult. Despite this variability, all studies in all settings concluded that providing TPT to PLHIV is potentially effective and cost-effective for preventing TB disease.

Levofloxacin based non-rifampicin anti-tuberculous therapy: An effective alternative in renal transplant recipients in resource limited setting.

INTRODUCTION: Rifampicin is one of the most effective components of anti-tuberculous therapy (ATT). Since rifampicin is a hepatic enzyme (CYP3A4) inducer, in a post-renal transplant recipient, the dose of calcineurin inhibitors needs to be up-regulated and frequently monitored. In resource-limited (low- and lower-middle-income countries) setting this is not always feasible. Therefore, we evaluated a non-rifampicin-based ATT using levofloxacin in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the medical records of renal transplant recipients diagnosed with tuberculosis in our institute between 2014 and 2017. After a brief discussion with patients regarding the nature and course of ATT, those who opted for a non-rifampicin based therapy due to financial constraints were included in the study and followed for a minimum of 6 months period after the completion of ATT. RESULTS: Out of the 550 renal transplant recipients, 67 (12.2%) developed tuberculosis after a median period of 24 (1-228) months following transplantation, of them, 64 patients opted for non-rifampicin-based ATT. The mean age was 37.6 years. Only 25% were given anti-thymocyte globulin based induction, while the majority (56; 87.5%) of them were on tacrolimus-based triple-drug maintenance therapy. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis was noted in 33% of cases, while 12 (18.7%) had disseminated disease. The median duration of treatment was 12 months and the cure rate of 93.7% (n = 60) was achieved at the end of therapy. CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin based ATT appears to be a safe and effective alternative of rifampicin in kidney transplant recipients who cannot afford heightened tacrolimus dosage.

Outcomes and adverse events of pre- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Kinshasa, Democratique Republic of the Congo: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) is a very serious form of tuberculosis that is burdened with a heavy mortality toll, especially before the advent of new TB drugs. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is among the countries most affected by this new epidemic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the records of all patients with pre- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis hospitalized from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 and monitored for at least 6 months to one year after the end of their treatment in Kinshasa; an individualized therapeutic regimen with bedaquiline for 20 months was built for each patient. The adverse effects were systematically monitored. RESULTS: Of the 40 laboratory-confirmed patients, 32 (80%) patients started treatment, including 29 preXRB and 3 XDR TB patients. In the eligible group, 3 patients (9.4%) had HIV-TB coinfections. The therapeutic success rate was 53.2%, and the mortality rate was 46.8% (15/32); there were no relapses, failures or losses to follow-up. All coinfected HIV-TB patients died during treatment. The cumulative patient survival rate was 62.5% at 3 months, 53.1% at 6 months and 53.1% at 20 months. The most common adverse events were vomiting, Skin rash, anemia and peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: The new anti-tuberculosis drugs are a real hope for the management of Drug Resistant tuberculosis patient and other new therapeutic combinations may improve favorable outcomes.

The effects of family, society and national policy support on treatment adherence among newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment is the most important cause of poor TB outcomes, and improving support for TB patients is a primary priority for governments, but there has been little research on the effects of family, social and national policy support factors on TB treatment adherence. The current study evaluated treatment adherence among newly diagnosed TB patients in Dalian, north-eastern China, and determined the effects of family, society, and national policy support factors on treatment adherence. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among newly diagnosed TB patients treated at the outpatient department of Dalian Tuberculosis Hospital from September 2019 to January 2020. Data were collected using a questionnaire that measured medication adherence, family support, social support, and national policy support and so on. Differences between groups were assessed using Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of adherence. RESULTS: A total of 481 newly diagnosed TB patients were recruited, of whom 45.7% had good adherence, and 27.4 and 26.8% had moderate and low adherence, respectively. Patients who had family members who frequently supervised medication (OR:0.34, 95% CI:0.16-0.70), family members who often provided spiritual encouragement (OR:0.13, 95% CI:0.02-0.72), a good doctor-patient relationship (OR:0.61, 95% CI:0.40-0.93), more TB-related knowledge (OR:0.49, 95% CI:0.33-0.72) and a high need for TB treatment policy support (OR:0.38, 95% CI:0.22-0.66) had satisfactory medication adherence. However, patients who had a college degree or higher (OR:1.69, 95% CI:1.04-2.74) and who suffered adverse drug reactions (OR:1.45, 95% CI:1.00-2.11) were more likely to have lower adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that non-adherence was high in newly diagnosed TB patients. Patients who had family members who frequently supervised medication and provided spiritual encouragement and a good doctor-patient relationship and TB-related knowledge and a high need for policy support contributed to high adherence. It is recommended to strengthen medical staff training and patient and family health education and to increase financial support for improving adherence.

Model-Based Assessment of Variability in Isoniazid Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism in Patients Co-Infected With Tuberculosis and HIV: Implications for a Novel Dosing Strategy.

Tuberculosis is the most common cause of death in HIV-infected patients. Isoniazid is used as a first-line drug to treat tuberculosis infection. However, variability in isoniazid pharmacokinetics can result in hepatotoxicity or treatment failure. Determination of clinical factors affecting isoniazid pharmacokinetics and metabolic pathways in HIV co-infected patients is therefore critical. Plasma levels of isoniazid, acetyl-isoniazid, and isonicotinic acid from 63 patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry followed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Patients were genotyped to determine acetylator status. Patients were either on concomitant efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy or HIV treatment naïve. Clearances of isoniazid were 1.3-fold and 2.3-fold higher in intermediate and rapid acetylators, respectively, compared with slow acetylators. Patients on concomitant efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy had 64% and 80% higher population predicted clearances of acetyl-isoniazid and isonicotinic acid, respectively, compared with patients who were HIV treatment naïve. Both sex and CD4 cell count affected the bioavailability of isoniazid. Variability in isoniazid exposure could be reduced by dose adaptions based on acetylator type and sex in addition to the currently used weight bands. A novel dosing strategy that has the potential to reduce isoniazid-related toxicity and treatment failure is presented.

Genetic Diversity in Drug Transporters: Impact in African Populations.

Polymorphisms in drug transporters, like the adenosine triposphate-binding cassette (ABC) and solute carrier (SLC) superfamilies, may contribute to the observed diversity in drug response in African patients. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary and analysis of the frequencies and distributions in African populations of ABC and SLC variants that affect drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Of polymorphisms evaluated in African populations, SLCO1B1 rs4149056 and SLC22A6 rs1158626 were found at markedly higher frequencies than in non-African populations. SLCO1B1 rs4149056 was associated with reduction in rifampin exposure, which has implications for dosing this important anti-tuberculosis therapy. SLC22A6 rs1158626 was associated with increased affinity for antiretroviral drugs. Genetic diversity in SLC and ABC transporters in African populations has implications for conventional therapies, notably in tuberculosis and HIV. More PK and PD data in African populations are needed to assess potential for a different response to drugs compared with other global populations.

Treatment with isoniazid or rifampin for latent tuberculosis infection: population-based study of hepatotoxicity, completion and costs.

Clinical trials suggest less hepatotoxicity and better adherence with 4 months rifampin (4R) versus 9 months isoniazid (9H) for treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Our objectives were to compare frequencies of severe hepatic adverse events and treatment completion, and direct health system costs of LTBI regimens 4R and 9H, in the general population of the province of Quebec, Canada, using provincial health administrative data.Our retrospective cohort included all patients starting rifampin or isoniazid regimens between 2003 and 2007. We estimated hepatotoxicity from hospitalisation records, treatment completion from community pharmacy records and direct costs from billing records and fee schedules. We compared rifampin to isoniazid using logistic (hepatotoxicity), log-binomial (completion), and gamma (costs) regression, with adjustment for age, co-morbidities and other confounders.10 559 individuals started LTBI treatment (9684 isoniazid; 875 rifampin). Rifampin patients were older with more baseline co-morbidities. Severe hepatotoxicity risk was higher with isoniazid (n=15) than rifampin (n=1), adjusted OR=2.3 (95% CI: 0.3-16.1); there were two liver transplants and one death with isoniazid and none with rifampin. Overall, patients without co-morbidities had lower hepatotoxicity risk (0.1% versus 1.0%). 4R completion (53.5%) was higher than 9H (36.9%), adjusted RR=1.5 (95% CI: 1.3-1.7). Mean costs per patient were lower for rifampin than isoniazid: adjusted cost ratio=0.7 (95% CI: 0.5-0.9).Risk of severe hepatotoxicity and direct costs were lower, and completion was higher, for 4R than 9H, after adjustment for age and co-morbidities. Severe hepatotoxicity resulted in death or liver transplant in three patients receiving 9H, compared with no patients receiving 4R.

Cost of managing severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions to first-line tuberculosis therapy in South Africa.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of managing treatment-limiting cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs to an alternative strategy of immediate treatment initiation using second-line drugs in a South African setting. METHODS: Clinical and cost data were retrospectively collected from patients presenting with a first-line anti-tuberculosis therapy-associated CADR. Costs (2016 US$) were estimated using an ingredient's approach from a healthcare provider perspective. The per-patient and total cost of drug rechallenge, the current management strategy for severe CADR, was calculated. Alternative strategies involving second-line treatment were derived from literature and expert clinical advice. RESULTS: Drug rechallenge costs US $5831 (95% CI: 5134-6527) per patient. Hospitalisation accounted for 62% of this cost. Alternative CADR management strategies using regimens containing rifabutin, bedaquiline and/or delamanid cost 44%-55% less than drug rechallenge (US $2651-US $3276/patient). In univariate sensitivity analyses, drug rechallenge and alternative strategies were most sensitive to hospitalisation and tuberculosis drug costs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to anti-tuberculosis treatment represent a significant economic burden. An alternate strategy of outpatient-initiated second-line therapy is economically feasible but requires clinical validation to assess effectiveness.

OBJECTIF: Comparer le coût de la prise ne charge des effets indésirables cutanés (EIC) limitant le traitement aux antituberculeux de première ligne à celui d'une stratégie alternative d'initiation immédiate du traitement par des médicaments de deuxième ligne dans un contexte sud-africain. MÉTHODES: Les données cliniques et les coûts ont été collectés rétrospectivement chez des patients présentant un EIC associé au traitement antituberculeux de première ligne. Les coûts (USD, 2016) ont été estimés en utilisant une approche d'ingrédient du point de vue d'un prestataire de soins de santé. Le coût par patient et le coût total du nouveau traitement, de la stratégie actuelle de prise en charge des cas d'EIC sévère, ont été calculés. Des stratégies alternatives impliquant un traitement de deuxième ligne ont été dérivées de la littérature et de conseils cliniques d'experts. RÉSULTATS: Le coût du nouveau traitement était de 5.831 USD (IC95%: 5.134 - 6.527) par patient. L'hospitalisation représentait 62% de ce coût. Les stratégies alternatives de prise en charge des EIC utilisant des schémas thérapeutiques contenant de la rifabutine, de la bédaquiline et/ou du delamanide coûtent de 44 % à 55 % moins cher que le nouveau traitement (2.651 USD - 3.276 USD/patient). Dans les analyses de sensibilité univariées, les stratégies de re-traitement et les stratégies alternatives étaient plus sensibles aux coûts d'hospitalisation et de médicaments antituberculeux, respectivement. CONCLUSION: Les EIC des antituberculeux représentent une charge économique importante. Une stratégie alternative de traitement de deuxième ligne mise en place chez des patients ambulatoires est économiquement réalisable mais nécessite une validation clinique pour évaluer l'efficacité.

Levofloxacin versus placebo for the prevention of tuberculosis disease in child contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: study protocol for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial (TB-CHAMP).

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) presents a challenge for global TB control. Treating individuals with MDR-TB infection to prevent progression to disease could be an effective public health strategy. Young children are at high risk of developing TB disease following infection and are commonly infected by an adult in their household. Identifying young children with household exposure to MDR-TB and providing them with MDR-TB preventive therapy could reduce the risk of disease progression. To date, no trials of MDR-TB preventive therapy have been completed and World Health Organization guidelines suggest close observation with no active treatment. METHODS: The tuberculosis child multidrug-resistant preventive therapy (TB-CHAMP) trial is a phase III cluster randomised placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of levofloxacin in young child contacts of MDR-TB cases. The trial is taking place at three sites in South Africa where adults with MDR-TB are identified. If a child aged < 5 years lives in their household, we assess the adult index case, screen all household members for TB disease and evaluate any child aged < 5 years for trial eligibility. Eligible children are randomised by household to receive daily levofloxacin (15-20 mg/kg) or matching placebo for six months. Children are closely monitored for disease development, drug tolerability and adverse events. The primary endpoint is incident TB disease or TB death by one year after recruitment. We will enrol 1556 children from approximately 778 households with an average of two eligible children per household. Recruitment will run for 18-24 months with all children followed for 18 months after treatment. Qualitative and health economic evaluations are embedded in the trial. DISCUSSION: If the TB-CHAMP trial demonstrates that levofloxacin is effective in preventing TB disease in young children who have been exposed to MDR-TB and that it is safe, well tolerated, acceptable and cost-effective, we would expect that that this intervention would rapidly transfer into policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN92634082 . Registered on 31 March 2016.

Bedaquiline- versus injectable-containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) continues to be a major public health challenge with suboptimal treatment outcomes including well-documented treatment-related toxicities. We compared the cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline (BDQ) containing regimens with injectable containing regimens (short-course regimen [SCR] and long-course regiman [LCR]) in India, Russia, and South Africa. METHODS: The analysis evaluated the direct costs of DR-TB treatment which included drugs, hospitalization, injectable-related adverse event costs, and other costs. Scenarios altered regimen costs, SCR/LCR ratio, and substitution rate between regimens (whether BDQ or injectable containing). RESULTS: BDQ containing regimens are more cost effective based on cost per treatment success compared with injectable containing regimens, reducing these in SCR by 18-20% and in LCR by 49-54%. Average cost effectiveness ratios (ACERs) of BDQ containing regimens are lower. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) is negative. Exclusive use of BDQ containing regimens results in approximately 61,000 more patients treated successfully over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Across all countries, BDQ containing regimens are dominant compared to injectable containing regimens, entailing lower treatment costs to achieve better clinical outcomes. This analysis can provide insight and support to local and global decision-makers and public health organizations to allocate efficiently resources improving patient and public health outcomes.

Evaluation of a medication monitor-based treatment strategy for drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients in China: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for drug-sensitive tuberculosis (TB) is taken for at least 6 months and problems with adherence are common. Therefore, there is substantial interest in the possible use of eHealth interventions to support patients to take their treatment. Electronic medication monitors have been shown to improve adherence to TB medication, but the impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. We aim to evaluate the impact of a medication monitor-based treatment strategy for drug-sensitive TB patients on a composite poor outcome measured over 18 months from start of TB treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct an open, pragmatic, cluster randomised superiority trial, with 24 counties/districts in three provinces in China, randomised 1:1 to implement the intervention or standard of care. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a new episode of GeneXpert-positive and rifampicin-sensitive pulmonary TB, who plan to be in the study area for the next 18 months, and will receive daily fixed-dose combination tablets for 6 months of treatment are eligible. The intervention is centred around a medication monitor that holds a 1-month supply of medication and has three key functions: as an audio and visual reminder for patients to take their daily medication; reminds patients of upcoming monthly visit; and records date and time whenever the box is opened. At the monthly follow-up visit, the doctor downloads these data to generate a graphical display of the last month's adherence record for discussion with the patient and potentially to switch the patient to more intensive management. The primary outcome is a composite poor outcome measured over 18 months from start of TB treatment, defined as either of poor outcome at the end of treatment (death, treatment failure, or loss to follow-up) or subsequent recurrence (culture positive for TB at 12 or 18 months or re-starting TB treatment in the follow-up period). An economic evaluation will also be conducted as part of this study. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess whether a medication monitor-based treatment strategy can improve clinical outcomes for TB patients. Several trials of other eHealth interventions for TB treatment are ongoing and are summarised in this paper. This trial will provide an important part of the emerging evidence base for the potential of eHealth to improve TB treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN35812455 ). Registered on May 19, 2016.

Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common during standard, long-course treatment for multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-/RR-TB). In particular, second-line injectables (SLIs) are associated with permanent hearing loss, acute renal injury and electrolyte imbalance. We adapted an established Markov model for ambulatory treatment to estimate the impact of the toxicity profile on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a proposed MDR-/RR-TB regimen replacing the SLI with bedaquiline (BDQ). METHODS: Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Clinical outcomes and ingredient costs from a provider perspective were derived from the South African public-sector treatment program or extracted from the literature. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3% per year over 10 years. RESULTS: A BDQ-based MDR-/RR-TB regimen compared with the SLI regimen had a mean ICER of US$516 per DALY averted using the standard Markov model. Costs for both regimens increased and effectiveness decreased for the SLI regimen once adjusted for toxicity. The resulting ICER for the BDQ-based regimen was cost saving (US$96/patient) and more effective (0.96 DALYs averted) after adjusting for ADRs. CONCLUSION: Decision-analysis models of treatment for MDR-/RR-TB, including new drug regimens, should consider the costs of managing ADRs and their sequelae.

Shorter treatment for minimal tuberculosis (TB) in children (SHINE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in children is frequently paucibacillary and non-severe forms of pulmonary TB are common. Evidence for tuberculosis treatment in children is largely extrapolated from adult studies. Trials in adults with smear-negative tuberculosis suggest that treatment can be effectively shortened from 6 to 4 months. New paediatric, fixed-dose combination anti-tuberculosis treatments have recently been introduced in many countries, making the implementation of World Health Organisation (WHO)-revised dosing recommendations feasible. The safety and efficacy of these higher drug doses has not been systematically assessed in large studies in children, and the pharmacokinetics across children representing the range of weights and ages should be confirmed. METHODS/DESIGN: SHINE is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled, two-arm trial comparing a 4-month vs the standard 6-month regimen using revised WHO paediatric anti-tuberculosis drug doses. We aim to recruit 1200 African and Indian children aged below 16 years with non-severe TB, with or without HIV infection. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints are TB disease-free survival 72 weeks post randomisation and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Nested pharmacokinetic studies will evaluate anti-tuberculosis drug concentrations, providing model-based predictions for optimal dosing, and measure antiretroviral exposures in order to describe the drug-drug interactions in a subset of HIV-infected children. Socioeconomic analyses will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention and social science studies will further explore the acceptability and palatability of these new paediatric drug formulations. DISCUSSION: Although recent trials of TB treatment-shortening in adults with sputum-positivity have not been successful, the question has never been addressed in children, who have mainly paucibacillary, non-severe smear-negative disease. SHINE should inform whether treatment-shortening of drug-susceptible TB in children, regardless of HIV status, is efficacious and safe. The trial will also fill existing gaps in knowledge on dosing and acceptability of new anti-tuberculosis formulations and commonly used HIV drugs in settings with a high burden of TB. A positive result from this trial could simplify and shorten treatment, improve adherence and be cost-saving for many children with TB. Recruitment to the SHINE trial begun in July 2016; results are expected in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number: ISRCTN63579542 , 14 October 2014. Pan African Clinical Trials Registry Number: PACTR201505001141379 , 14 May 2015. Clinical Trial Registry-India, registration number: CTRI/2017/07/009119, 27 July 2017.

Pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in patients on antituberculosis treatment in high human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis burden countries: A systematic review.

AIMS: Efavirenz (EFV) and rifampicin-isoniazid (RH) are cornerstone drugs in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-tuberculosis (TB) coinfection treatment but with complex drug interactions, efficacy and safety challenges. We reviewed recent data on EFV and RH interaction in TB/HIV high-burden countries. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies conducted in the high TB/HIV-burden countries between 1990 and 2016 on EFV pharmacokinetics during RH coadministration in coinfected patients. Two reviewers conducted article screening and data collection. RESULTS: Of 119 records retrieved, 22 were included (two conducted in children), reporting either EFV mid-dose or pre-dose concentrations. In 19 studies, median or mean concentrations of RH range between 1000 and 4000 ng ml-1 , the so-called therapeutic range. The proportion of patients with subtherapeutic concentration of RH ranged between 3.1 and 72.2%, in 12 studies including one conducted in children. The proportion of patients with supratherapeutic concentration ranged from 19.6 to 48.0% in six adult studies and one child study. Five of eight studies reported virological suppression >80%. The association between any grade hepatic and central nervous system adverse effects with EFV/RH interaction was demonstrated in two and three studies, respectively. The frequency of the CYP2B6 516G > T polymorphism ranged from 10 to 28% and was associated with higher plasma EFV concentrations, irrespective of ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TB drug coadministration minimally affect the EFV exposure, efficacy and safety among TB-HIV coinfected African and Asian patients. This supports the current 600 mg EFV dosing when coadministered with anti-TB drugs.

Direct costs of managing adverse drug reactions during rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment in South Africa.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the provider costs of managing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to standard long-course treatment for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) according to South African guidelines. METHODS: We parameterised a published Markov health state model for MDR/RR-TB with guidelines-based, bottom-up public-sector provider costing of ADR management. Frequency of ADR occurrence was extracted from the literature. Costs were estimated over 10 years, discounted 3% annually and tested using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: On average, guidelines-based costing of moderate ADRs weighted by the frequency of occurrence was US$135.76 (standard deviation [SD] US$17.18) and the cost of serious ADRs was US$521.29 (SD US$55.99). We estimated that the incremental costs of ADR management were US$380.17 annually per patient initiating MDR/RR-TB treatment. The incremental costs of ADR management for the public health sector in South Africa was US$4.76 million, 8.3% of the estimated cohort costs of MDR/RR-TB treatment ($57.55 million) for the 2015 cohort of 12 527 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Management of multiple ADRs and serious ADRs, which are common during the first 6 months of standard, long-course MDR/RR-TB treatment, substantially increases provider treatment costs. These results need to be taken into account when comparing regimen costs, and highlight the urgent need to identify drug regimens with improved safety profiles.