COVID-19 Treatments Sold Online Without Prescription Requirements in the United States: Cross-sectional Study Evaluating Availability, Safety and Marketing of Medications.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased online purchases and heightened interest in existing treatments. Dexamethasone, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir-ritonavir have been touted as potential COVID-19 treatments. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the availability of 3 potential COVID-19 treatments online and evaluated the safety and marketing characteristics of websites selling these products during the pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the months of June 2020 to August 2020, by searching the first 100 results on Google, Bing, and Yahoo! mimicking a US consumer. Unique websites were included if they sold targeted medicines, were in English, offered US shipping, and were free to access. Identified online pharmacies were categorized as rogue, unclassified, or legitimate based on LegitScript classifications. Patient safety characteristics, marketing techniques, price, legitimacy, IP addresses, and COVID-19 mentions were recorded. RESULTS: We found 117 websites: 30 selling dexamethasone (19/30, 63% rogue), 39 selling hydroxychloroquine (22/39, 56% rogue), and 48 selling lopinavir-ritonavir (33/48, 69% rogue). This included 89 unique online pharmacies: 70% were rogue (n=62), 22% were unapproved (n=20), and 8% were considered legitimate (n=7). Prescriptions were not required among 100% (19/19), 61% (20/33), and 50% (11/22) of rogue websites selling dexamethasone, lopinavir-ritonavir, and hydroxychloroquine, respectively. Overall, only 32% (24/74) of rogue websites required prescriptions to buy these medications compared with 94% (31/33) of unapproved and 100% (10/10) of legitimate websites (P<.001). Rogue sites rarely offered pharmacist counseling (1/33, 3% for lopinavir-ritonavir to 2/22, 9% for hydroxychloroquine). Drug warnings were unavailable in 86% (6/7) of unapproved dexamethasone sites. It was difficult to distinguish between rogue, unapproved, and legitimate online pharmacies solely based on website marketing characteristics. Illegitimate pharmacies were more likely to offer bulk discounts and claim price discounts, yet dexamethasone and hydroxychloroquine were more expensive online. An inexpensive generic version of lopinavir-ritonavir that is not authorized for use in the United States was available online offering US shipping. Some websites claimed hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir-ritonavir were effective COVID-19 treatments despite lack of scientific evidence. In comparing IP addresses to locations claimed on the websites, only 8.5% (7/82) matched their claimed locations. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of safety measures by illegitimate online pharmacies endanger patients, facilitating access to medications without appropriate oversight by health care providers to monitor clinical response, drug interactions, and adverse effects. We demonstrated how easy it is to go online to buy medications that are touted to treat COVID-19 even when current clinical evidence does not support their use for self-treatment. We documented that illegitimate online pharmacies sidestep prescription requirements, skirt pharmacist counseling, and make false claims regarding efficacy for COVID-19 treatment. Health care professionals must urgently educate the public of the dangers of purchasing drugs from illegitimate websites and highlight the importance of seeking treatment through authentic avenues of care.

Association of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment With Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Hepatitis C.

Importance: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs are highly effective in curing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Previous simulations showed extended life as a key health advantage of DAA drugs, but real-world evidence on the association between DAA treatment and reduced mortality is limited. Objectives: To examine the association of DAA treatment with mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with hepatitis C. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Medicare claims data of beneficiaries who sought hepatitis C care for the first time between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, after at least a 1-year washout period. Medicare Part D files were used in identifying DAA therapy initiation and completion. Death dates, demographic data, and indicators of health risks were obtained from the Master Beneficiary Summary Files. Beneficiaries with hepatitis C were considered as patients with DAA treatment if they initiated DAA therapy during the study period. Beneficiaries with hepatitis C who did not initiate DAA therapy during the study period were considered as patients without DAA treatment. Patients without DAA treatment were selected using 1-to-1 propensity score matching. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020. Exposures: Completion of DAA treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death from the index date of seeking hepatitis C care after at least a 1-year washout period. Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-varying exposure were used to compare mortality rates between propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment. Separate analyses were performed for patients with or without cirrhosis. Heterogeneity in the association between DAA treatment and mortality by sex and dual-eligibility status was examined. Results: A propensity score-matched sample of 51 478 Medicare beneficiaries with a mean (SD) age of 59.4 (11.1) years and 30 473 men (59.2%) was assessed. Of this total, 8240 patients (16.0%) had cirrhosis (5224 men [63.4%]; mean [SD] age, 62.3 [9.7] years) and 43 238 patients (84.0%) had no cirrhosis (25 249 men [58.4%]; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [11.3] years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of dying between patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment in the cirrhosis group was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57). The association of DAA treatment with mortality did not differ by sex (women vs men: HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.38-0.56] vs HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.47-0.60]; P = .27) or dual-eligibility status (non-dual-eligible HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.43-0.63] vs dual-eligible HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.44-0.57]; P = .80) in the cirrhosis group. The adjusted HR of dying between patients with DAA treatment and those without DAA treatment among patients without cirrhosis was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.58). The association of DAA treatment with mortality did not differ by sex (women vs men: HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46-0.60] vs HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.50-0.60]; P = .66) among patients without cirrhosis. However, the survival advantage associated with DAAs for non-dual-eligible beneficiaries was statistically significantly higher than for dual-eligible beneficiaries among patients without cirrhosis (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55] vs HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.52-0.62]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, DAA treatment appeared to be associated with a decrease in mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with or without cirrhosis. These findings suggest that increasing access to DAA drugs for all patients with HCV infection, regardless of disease progression, could improve population health.

Global prevalence of hepatitis C virus in children in 2018: a modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence estimates for adults and high-risk groups have been widely published, but the disease burden in children is poorly understood. Direct-acting antiviral drugs, which are considered to be highly effective curative therapies for HCV, are now approved for paediatric patients as young as 3 years. Reliable prevalence estimates for this population are needed to inform scale-up of treatment and national strategies. This analysis combines past modelling and epidemiological work in 104 countries and territories to estimate global HCV prevalence in children in 2018. METHODS: In this modelling study, a comprehensive literature review for articles published between Jan 1, 2000, and March 31, 2019, was used to determine historical HCV prevalence estimates in children in all 249 countries and territories of the world. We identified published HCV prevalence estimates for children aged 0-18 years who are not at high risk of HCV infection in 39 countries and territories and inputted them into dynamic Markov disease-burden models to estimate viraemic HCV prevalence in 2018. For 25 of them, which had complete data, available information on HCV prevalence in children was used to build regression models to predict paediatric prevalence in an additional 65 countries and territories that had country-specific or territory-specific data about predictors only. Regression models were created for each 5-year paediatric age cohort from 0 to 19 years, considering several predictor variables. The data and forecasts from the 104 countries and territories for which data were available were used to calculate HCV prevalence by Global Burden of Disease region, which was then applied to the remaining 145 countries and territories to generate a global estimate. FINDINGS: The global estimate for viraemic prevalence in the paediatric population aged 0-18 years was 0·13% (95% uncertainty interval 0·08-0·16), corresponding to 3·26 million (2·07-3·90) children with HCV in 2018. HCV prevalence increased with age in all countries and territories. HCV prevalence in women of childbearing age was the strongest predictor of HCV prevalence in children aged 0-4 years (p<0·0001). Prevalence of HCV in adults was significantly associated with HCV prevalence in children aged 5-19 years (p<0·0001), and the proportion of HCV infections in people who inject drugs was significantly associated with HCV prevalence in children aged 15-19 years (p=0·036). INTERPRETATION: Most studies on HCV prevalence in children focus on high-risk groups and highly endemic geographic areas. Our analysis provides global prevalence estimates of HCV in the paediatric population. Treatment in paediatric patients requires different clinical and population health management optimisation than in adults. Because of this heterogeneity, country-specific or territory-specific and age-specific HCV prevalence estimates can help countries and territories to improve national HCV elimination strategies. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences, John C Martin Foundation, and private donors.

Impact of a multiplex PCR point-of-care test for influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus on an acute pediatric hospital ward.

Patients with respiratory infections are often managed presumptively until confirmation of infection status. We assessed the impact of introducing the Enigma® MiniLab™ FluAB-RSV point-of-care test (POCT) on patients admitted with a suspected respiratory virus driven illness in an acute pediatric ward. This utilized a before and after design (respiratory viral seasons 2013/14 versus 2014/15). Following POCT implementation, oseltamivir prescribing increased in patients with influenza (OR = 12.7, P = 0.05, 95% CI [1.0, 153.8]). A reduction in the average reimbursement charges without a change in the length of stay was observed. Modeling suggested that laboratory test cost savings could be achieved if the POCT cost £30 and was used for screening, followed by the respiratory viral panel for RSV and influenza negative patients. A rapid POCT for influenza A/B and RSV infections in pediatric inpatients may improve oseltamivir prescribing, strengthen antimicrobial stewardship, reduce reimbursement charges and decrease laboratory costs.

Future Considerations for the Evaluation of Hepatitis C Virus Treatments in Pan-Genotypic Therapy for Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naive Patients.

Given the recent approval of the first pan-genotypic chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy, managed care, health systems, and clinicians will need to evaluate current practices related to essential laboratory assessments used to select therapy. Historically, clinicians and payers required a battery of tests to determine HCV genotype, viral load, degree of fibrosis, and organ function. In light of current and forthcoming approvals of pan-genotypic therapy, clinicians and payers can expect a more competitive marketplace and a downward curve in the price of therapy. Ultimately, this development will lead to the cost of screenings and assessments having an increased role in selecting an optimal HCV therapy. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose. All authors contributed to study concept and design. Calabrese took the lead in data collection, along with Shaya. Data interpretation was performed by Calabrese and Hynicka, along with Rodriguez de Bittner and Shaya. The manuscript was written and revised by Calabrese and Hynicka, along with Rodriguez de Bittner and Shaya.

[Costs of a guideline-based treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C in the era of interferon-free treatment]. / Kosten einer leitliniengerechten Versorgung von Hepatitis-C-Patienten im Zeitalter Interferon-freier Therapien.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has considerably changed with the introduction of recent direct acting antivirals. These antivirals have sustained virologic response (SVR) rates above 90 % as well as reduced toxicity and treatment duration. Therefore, current German guidelines recommend these interferon-free regimens as first-choice treatment. Nevertheless, recent developments were accompanied by a significant increase in treatment costs, which led to extensive discussions on reasonable pharmaceutical prices. The aim of the current study was to analyze the average treatment costs and costs per patient cured for guideline treatment recommendations. Analyses were stratified according to genotype, treatment status (naive/experienced), and presence/absence of cirrhosis. Costs were separated in (1.) basic diagnostic procedures, (2.) monitoring, and (3.) pharmaceuticals. The calculation is based on a remuneration scheme in the statutory health insurance system. In treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic patients, the average cost is 41 766 €/SVR for the treatment with SOF/LDV calculated (PTV/r/OMV+DSV: 53 129 €/SVR). In treatment-naive cirrhotic patients, costs were 60 323 €/SVR (SOF/LDV+RBV) and 80 604 €/SVR (PTV/r/OMV+DSV+RBV). Treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients had average costs of 60 366 €/SVR for SOF/LDV treatment as well as 53 134 €/SVR for PTV/r/OMV+DSV±RBV treatment (cirrhotic patients: 62 208 €/SVR for SOF/LDV+RBV; 80 824 €/SVR for PTV/r/OMV+DSV+RBV). The average treatment costs per SVR in treatment-naive genotype 1 patients are comparable to previous standard of care treatments and lower in treatment-experienced patients. In other genotypes, treatment costs and costs per cure are significantly higher compared to previous standard of care. However, long-term modelling studies show that new regimens are cost-effective.

The use of generics to treat chronic hepatitis C: not quite ready for the big stage.

Recently developed direct acting antivirals have been highly effective in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Due to their expense, there has been development of generic formulations of these medications in many countries. However, there has been controversy regarding the bioequivalence of generics when compared to brand name medications. Inactive ingredients, which may differ in generic medications, can alter the bioequivalence of the active ingredient as well as provoke intolerance or confusion among patients. There is also concern regarding the quality control and assessment of the manufacturing process of generics. When taken together these issues have the potential to lead to treatment failure. The use of generics to treat chronic hepatitis C will remain controversial, until these issues are adequately addressed.

Transitioning to highly effective therapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a policy statement and implementation guideline.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection increases all-cause mortality, rates of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation and overall health care utilization. Morbidity and mortality disproportionately affect individuals born between 1945 and 1975. The recent development of well-tolerated and highly effective therapies for chronic HCV infection represents a unique opportunity to dramatically reduce rates of HCV-related complications and their costs. Critical to the introduction of such therapies will be well-designed provincial programming to ensure immediate treatment access to individuals at highest risk for complication, and well-defined strategies to address the global treatment needs of traditionally high-risk and marginalized populations. HCV practitioners in New Brunswick created a provincial strategy that stratifies treatment according to those at highest need, measures clinical impact, and creates evaluation strategies to demonstrate the significant direct and indirect cost savings anticipated with curative treatments.

Current management and recommendations for access to antiviral therapy of herpes labialis.

Herpes labialis is a common skin infective condition, worldwide, which is primarily caused by HSV-1. Recurrent episodes of herpes labialis, also known as cold sores, can be frequent, painful, long-lasting and disfiguring for infected patients. At present, there are two types of antivirals for the treatment of herpes labialis, topical and oral, which are available over the counter or as prescription-only. The aim of antiviral therapy is to block viral replication to enable shortening the duration of symptoms and to accelerate healing of the lesions associated with herpes labialis. This review examines the evidence for the effectiveness of current topical and oral antivirals in the management of recurrent episodes of herpes labialis. In most countries, oral antivirals for herpes labialis are available as prescription-only. However, in early 2010, the oral antiviral famciclovir was reclassified from prescription-only medicine to pharmacist-controlled status in New Zealand. The benefits and risks associated with moving an antiviral therapy for herpes labialis from prescription-only to pharmacist-controlled status are reviewed here, and the implications for patients, general physicians and pharmacists are considered.

BEI Resources: supporting antiviral research.

The Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources) provides unique, quality-assured reagents to the scientific community for use in basic research and product development involving biodefense and emerging infectious diseases. These include microorganisms (up to Biosafety Level-3) on the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lists of Category A, B and C priority pathogens. In addition to live microorganisms, related products such as polyclonal antisera, monoclonal antibodies, isolated nucleic acid preparations, overlapping peptide arrays, purified proteins, and assay kits are also available. Many of these materials have direct or indirect applications in antiviral research. These reagents are available free of charge to all registered investigators, regardless of funding source or affiliation. Acquisition of new reagents for the repository is one of the critically necessary and challenging tasks for BEI Resources. Therefore, investigators are encouraged to deposit relevant items, so as to provide access to materials, relief from the burden of distribution, protection of intellectual property rights, and secure storage. In addition, BEI Resources has the capability of contracting for the preparation of specific reagents. If there is a resource needed to advance a specific research area, contact an NIAID program officer or use the "suggest a reagent" option on the BEI Resources homepage, (www.beiresources.org).

WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. Forty-first report.

This report presents the recommendations of an international group of experts convened by the World Health Organization to consider matters concerning the quality assurance of pharmaceuticals and specifications for drug substances and dosage forms. The report is complemented by a number of annexes. These include: guidance notes on related substances tests concerning the dosage form monographs of The International Pharmacopoeia; a list of available International Chemical Reference Substances and International Infrared Reference Spectra; a revision of the general guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and distribution of chemical reference substances; the procedure for assessing the acceptability, in principle, of pharmaceutical products for purchase by United Nations agencies; the procedure for assessing the acceptability, in principle, of quality control laboratories for use by United Nations agencies; and guidance on variations to a prequalified product dossier.

Counterfeit or substandard antimicrobial drugs: a review of the scientific evidence.

There is growing universal concern regarding counterfeit medications. In particular, counterfeit antimicrobial drugs are a threat to public health with many devastating consequences for patients; increased mortality and morbidity and emergence of drug resistance. In addition, physicians treating these patients lose their confidence in the medications used and report high levels of bacterial resistance. The problem with fake and suboptimal medications got worse with the advent of the World Wide Web; a significant proportion of medications that are sold through Internet pharmacies is counterfeit. Various initiatives of the WHO (the International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce) are hopefully going to tackle this very important public health issue. In this article, we review the available evidence in peer-reviewed articles and World Wide Web information resources regarding the issue of counterfeit antimicrobials.

Valacyclovir prophylaxis for the prevention of Herpes simplex virus reactivation in recipients of progenitor cells transplantation.

HSV can cause oral lesions that exacerbate chemotherapy-related mucositis. Intravenous acyclovir is effective in preventing HSV reactivations, but expensive. Valacyclovir has good bioavailability and has not been studied for prophylaxis of HSV among PCT patients. We compared the efficacy and costs of valacyclovir in preventing HSV reactivation among HSV seropositive autologous progenitor cell transplantation (APCT) patients with historical controls in whom intravenous acyclovir or no HSV prophylaxis were used. Valacyclovir group: From October 1997 to April 1999 108 adult patients received valacyclovir 500 mg twice daily from day -3 of APCT until neutropenia recovery or day +30. Valacyclovir was switched to intravenous acyclovir in cases of oral intolerance (17 patients) or suspected HSV reactivation (five patients). Intravenous acyclovir group: From January 1996 to October 1997 43 patients received 5 mg/kg twice-daily intravenous acyclovir from day -3 until recovery from neutropenia. No prophylaxis group: 38 patients from January 1996 to October 1997 did not receive HSV prophylaxis. HSV reactivations were seen in 2.7%, 2% and 45% of patients in the valacyclovir, intravenous acyclovir, and no prophylaxis groups, respectively. Valacyclovir was well tolerated and was the least expensive strategy. Oral valacyclovir was as effective as intravenous acyclovir for the prophylaxis of HSV reactivation in APCT patients.

Establishment of new and replacement World Health Organization International Biological Standards for human interferon alpha and omega.

The complexity of the human interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) family, with its multiple molecular forms and various biological activities, raises a number of scientific issues with regard to the biological standardisation of natural and recombinant IFN-alpha products. To address such issues and to achieve an appropriate biological standardisation of human interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) preparations, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) of the United Kingdom (UK), in association with the Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the United States of America (USA), organised an international collaborative study, which was subsequently divided into two parts. Ninety-three participating laboratories from 29 countries worldwide participated in the first part of the study. They performed titrations on up to 15 different IFN-alpha preparations and one IFN-omega (omega) preparation in a variety of assays, including those based upon antiviral, antiproliferative, and other biological activities of IFN, and contributed raw data from these assays to NIBSC for analysis and calculation of relative activities. Analysis of data from this part of the study showed a greater than expected assay-dependent disparity between the relative activities of different IFN-alpha preparations. This disparity was found when only antiviral assays were considered and even when there were only small molecular dissimilarities between two otherwise closely related IFN-alpha preparations. The lack of assay independence and relative activity equivalence has indicated that a single biological potency standard for all IFN-alpha subtypes and mixtures would be inappropriate. Hence, individual, homologous standards, each with a separate unitage, were required for biological standardisation and potency determinations of individual IFN-alpha subtypes. At this stage, potency assignments to the IFN-alpha and -omega preparations included in the study were made as far as possible on the basis of comparison of antiviral activity with that of the 1st International Reference Preparation (IRP) for IFN, human leukocyte, 69/19. However, it was recognised that other standards had been used in assays to estimate potencies of widely available, current, therapeutic IFN-alpha products. Thus, to ensure the continuity of unitages already in use for IFN-alpha products, the second part of the study, which involved 12 members of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (IFPMA), was carried out using for calibration of antiviral assays those IFN-alpha preparations that most closely matched manufacturers' products or that had been previously used for assay calibration by a manufacturer for a particular product. On the basis of data analysis from the second part of the study, potency assignments to the IFN-alpha preparations, as made in the first part of the study, were either left unchanged or changed to potency assignments that ensured as far as possible continuity with existing unitages. From among the IFN preparations evaluated, the following were recommended as the most suitable to continue or replace existing WHO international standards (IS) and have subsequently been formally established as WHO IS at the 51st meeting (October 1999) of the WHO ECBS: 83/514, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha1 8000 international units (IU); 95/650, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2a, 63,000 IU; 95/566, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2b, 70,000 IU; 95/580, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha2c, 40,000 IU; 95/572, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha1/8, 27,000 IU; 94/786, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alphaCon1, 100,000 IU; 94/784, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (leukocyte), 11,000 IU; 95/574, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (leukocyte n3), 60,000 IU; 95/568, 2nd WHO IS for human IFN-alpha (lymphoblastoid n1), 38,000 IU; 94/754, 1st WHO IS for human IFN-omega, 20,000 IU. These WHO IS are available upon request to NIBSC.

Effects of cytokines on antiviral pharmacokinetics: an alternative approach to assessment of drug interactions using bioequivalence guidelines.

The effects of cytokines on the pharmacokinetics of nucleoside analogs were evaluated in two separate studies using zidovudine in combination with interleukin-2 and didanosine in combination with alpha interferon. In each study, drug interactions were evaluated by using both a standard method (Student's t test) and bioequivalence testing. Serial blood samples were collected from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients prior to and during cytokine therapy for determination of nucleoside analog concentrations. Concentrations were fit separately to a two-compartment model by using the iterative two-stage approach to population analysis. No alterations in area under the curve or oral clearance were observed for either drug during combination therapy. In general, there was good agreement between statistical methods for determining if antiviral pharmacokinetic parameters were altered by concomitant cytokine therapy. However, large individual changes in the maximum concentration of zidovudine in serum were detected by bioequivalence testing but no difference was found by Student's t test. For didanosine, significant but clinically irrelevant decreases determined by standard hypothesis testing were seen for both the volume of the central compartment (1.91 to 1.86 liters) and the absorption rate constant (0.79 to 0.73 h-1) in the presence of alpha interferon. No interaction was noted for these parameters by using bioequivalence guidelines. Bioequivalence testing may provide an alternative approach to assessment of drug interactions. Interleukin-2 and alpha interferon do not alter the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and didanosine, respectively.