One-stop preoperative assessment of renal vessels for living donors with 3.0 T non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: compared with computerized tomography angiography and surgical results.

OBJECTIVE: The study was to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of assessment for living renal donors before transplantation by using 3.0 T non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA). METHODS: 30 renal donors were investigated and underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 3.0 T NCE-MRA before nephrectomy. Two radiologists independently assessed arterial and venous anatomy and potential kidney lesions. The image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), diameters and lengths of renal arteries and veins were compared between CTA and NCE-MRA. Imaging findings were compared with the surgical results served as reference standard. Agreement was assessed using κ test. The Wilcoxon test and paired sample t test were used for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The results of image quality score for renal arteries and veins were highly consistent between the two radiologists in NCE-MRA (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the scores of renal arterial and venous branches between NCE-MRA and CTA (p > 0.05). The SNR and CNR of renal vessels were higher than CTA (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the length of renal vessels measured by the two methods (p > 0.05), and the diameter was smaller than that of CTA (p < 0.05). The detection of normal renal arteries and early branches by both examination techniques was consistent with intraoperative findings. Both methods showed good consistency between the anatomical variation of renal vein and the intraoperative diagnosis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 3.0 T NCE-MRA can be used for evaluation of main renal arteries and veins with high accuracy for anatomy and variation classification, and can be used for pre-operative vascular evaluation of living donor kidney transplantation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 3.0 T NCE-MRA can be used for evaluation of main renal arteries and veins with high accuracy for anatomy and variation classification, and can be used for pre-operative vascular evaluation of living donor kidney transplantation.

Assessment of renal vascular anatomy on multi-detector computed tomography in living renal donors.

BACKGROUND: Prospective renal donors are a select population of healthy individuals who have been thoroughly screened for significant comorbidities before they undergo multi-detector computed tomography angiography and urography (MDCT). PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe the anatomy of potential living renal donor subjects using MDCT over a 2-year period. The primary objective is to identify the renal arterial anatomy variations, with a secondary objective of identifying venous and collecting system/ureteric variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed of prospective living kidney transplant donors at a national kidney transplant centre. Study inclusion criteria were all potential kidney donors who underwent MDCT during the living-donor assessment process over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Our cohort included 160 potential living donors who had MDCT; mean age was 45.6 years (range, 21-71). Two renal arteries were identified on the left in 40 subjects (25%) and on the right in 42 subjects (26.3%). A total of 3 or more renal arteries were identified on the left in 7 subjects (4.4%) and on the right in 7 subjects (4.4%). On the left, the distances between multiple arteries ranged from 1 mm to 43 mm, and on the right, they were 1 mm to 84 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Conventionally described anatomy was only seen on the left side in 70.6% and 69.4% on the right side of subjects. Single renal arteries are seen in 54.4% showing that conventional anatomy has a relatively low incidence.

Morphological assessment of cat kidneys using computed tomography.

There are numerous publications about feline renal imaging information; however, none have established reference values for kidney size using computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to determine renal size and shape as well as the morphology of renal-related structures in clinically normal cats (Felis catus) that underwent CT. Twenty-seven healthy cats underwent pre- and post-iodinated contrast-enhanced CT. Most cat (59%) kidneys were located at the same level. The average pre-contrast dimensions of the left kidney included a width of 2.46 ± 0.28 cm, a length of 3.52 ± 0.44 cm and a height 2.19 ± 0.31 cm, whereas those of the right kidneys were 2.45 ± 0.27 cm, 3.54 ± 0.46 cm and 2.05 ± 0.23 cm, respectively. After contrast enhancement, kidneys were slightly enlarged though not significantly. Additionally, renal length (LK or RK) was compared with second lumbar vertebra (L2) length and abdominal aorta diameter (AO). AO was significantly larger in male cats whereas L2 length appeared longer in male cats, but was not statistically different from the female cats. The LK/L2 and RK/L2 ratios were 2.29 ± 0.23 and 2.36 ± 0.20, respectively, and the LK/AO and RK/AO were 11.72 ± 1.37 and 12.05 ± 1.47, respectively. Renal vessels were examined. The renal vein was obviously larger than the renal artery, and paired renal veins were observed periodically. This study provides CT information about the feline kidney, which may help to establish reference values and information regarding renal structure prior to surgery in practice.

[Preoperative assessment of renal vascular anatomy for donor nephrectomy: Is CT superior to MRI?]. / Évaluation préopératoire du nombre de vaisseaux chez le donneur de rein vivant. La TDM est-elle supérieure à l'IRM ?

BACKGROUND: computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are both used in the preoperative assessment of vascular anatomy before donor nephrectomy. Our objective was to determine retrospectively and to compare the sensitivity of CTA and MRA imaging in preoperative renal vascularisation in living kidney donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: between 1999 and 2007, 42 kidney donors were assessed in our center: 27 by MRA, 10 by CTA, and five by both techniques. Images were interpreted using multiplanar reconstructions. Results were compared retrospectively with peroperative findings; discordant cases were re-examined by an experienced radiologist. Numbers of vessels detected with imaging methods was compared with numbers actually found at the operating time. RESULTS: MRA showed 35/43 arteries (Se 81.4 %) and 33/34 veins (Se 97.1 %), and CTA showed 18/18 arteries (Se 100 %) and 15/16 veins (Se 93.8 %). The presence of multiple arteries was detected in only one third of cases (3/9) on MRI scans; this difference was statistically significant. The missed arteries were not detected on second examination of the MRI scans with the knowledge of peroperative findings. CONCLUSION: MRA is less sensitive than CTA for preoperative vascularisation imaging in living renal donors, especially in the detection of multiple renal arteries.

Diagnostic accuracy of a volume-rendered computed tomography movie and other computed tomography-based imaging methods in assessment of renal vascular anatomy for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based imaging methods for assessing renal vascular anatomy, imaging studies, including standard axial CT, three-dimensional volume-rendered CT (3DVR-CT), and a 3DVR-CT movie, were performed on 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (10 right side, 20 left side) for predicting the location of the renal arteries and renal, adrenal, gonadal, and lumbar veins. These findings were compared with videos obtained during the operation. Two of 37 renal arteries observed intraoperatively were missed by standard axial CT and 3DVR-CT, whereas all arteries were identified by the 3DVR-CT movie. Two of 36 renal veins were missed by standard axial CT and 3DVR-CT, whereas 1 was missed by the 3DVR-CT movie. In 20 left renal hilar anatomical structures, 20 adrenal, 20 gonadal, and 22 lumbar veins were observed during the operation. Preoperatively, the standard axial CT, 3DVR-CT, and 3DVR-CT movie detected 11, 19, and 20 adrenal veins; 13, 14, and 19 gonadal veins; and 6, 11, and 15 lumbar veins, respectively. Overall, of 135 renal vascular structures, the standard axial CT, 3DVR-CT, and 3DVR-CT movie accurately detected 99 (73.3%), 113 (83.7%), and 126 (93.3%) vessels, respectively, which indicated that the 3DVR-CT movie demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate than other CT-based imaging methods (P < 0.05). The 3DVR-CT movie accurately provides essential information about the renal vascular anatomy before laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Assessment of live kidney donors by magnetic resonance angiography: reliability and impact on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft retrieval from live donors requires accurate determination of kidney anatomy prior to surgery, particularly the arterial supply. Traditionally, conventional angiography has been used to obtain this information. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) offers a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative, but has been considered to be less accurate. Despite this criticism, many centers have moved to MRA screening of potential kidney donors. The objective of this study is to evaluate our experience of the reliability of MRA in determining the arterial anatomy of living kidney donors as compared to the intra-operative findings. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of gadolinium-enhanced, ultra-fast, three-dimensional, spoiled gradient-echo MRA in live kidney donors in the Southern Alberta Transplant Program and compared these results with the intra-operative findings during nephrectomy, as the gold standard. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients, an accessory renal artery was found intra-operatively in eight cases; two of which were erroneously diagnosed as normal by MRA. The negative predictive value for MRA was 0.97, false-negative rate was 0.25, and sensitivity was 0.75. No patient experienced side-effects from the MRA procedure. No donor needed conversion to open nephrectomy because of an undetected accessory renal artery. One allograft with an accessory renal artery developed thrombosis of the lower pole of the kidney despite arterial reconstruction. Kidney function in the recipient of this allograft was excellent and there was no urinary leak. CONCLUSION: In our hands, MRA determined the vascular anatomy of potential kidney donors with an acceptable negative predictive value of 97%.

Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the image quality, sensitivity, and specificity of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography accelerated by parallel acquisition (ie, fast MR angiography) with MR angiography not accelerated by parallel acquisition (ie, conventional MR angiography) for assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty consecutive patients (33 men, seven women; mean age, 63 years) suspected of having aortoiliac and renal arterial stenoses and thus examined with DSA underwent both fast (mean imaging time, 17 seconds) and conventional (mean imaging time, 29 seconds) MR angiography. The arterial tree was divided into segments for image analysis. Two readers independently evaluated all MR angiograms for image quality, presence of arterial stenosis, and renal arterial variants. Image quality, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed on per-patient and per-segment bases for multiple comparisons (with Bonferroni correction) and for dependencies between segments (with patient as the primary sample unit). Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Overall, the image quality with fast MR angiography was significantly better (P=.001) than that with conventional MR angiography. At per-segment analysis, the image quality of fast MR angiograms of the distal renal artery tended to be better than that of conventional MR angiograms of these vessels. Differences in sensitivity for the detection of arterial stenosis between the two MR angiography techniques were not significant for either reader. Interobserver agreement in the detection of variant renal artery anatomy was excellent with both conventional and fast MR angiography (kappa=1.00). CONCLUSION: Fast MR angiography and conventional MR angiography do not differ significantly in terms of arterial stenosis grading or renal arterial variant detection.

Assessment of the arteries in living kidney donors: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography with intraoperative findings.

Comprehensive imaging evaluation of kidney donor anatomy is crucial for selecting candidates for living kidney transplantation and for determining the surgical technique to procure the renal graft. In 76 living renal donors we compared the results of preoperative magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with the intraoperative findings of arterial anatomy. Donors were evaluated for the number of main renal arteries and the presence of any polar arteries. A total of 80 main renal arteries and five polar arteries were observed at MRA. At surgery, 90 main renal arteries and eight polar arteries were identified. MRA demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 18%, 98%, and 87%, respectively, for main arteries and 25%, 96%, and 88% for polar arteries. Eleven (14.5%) kidneys displayed more than one main artery and MRA only detected two cases. Eight kidneys had polar arteries and MRA only detected two cases. MRA is a reliable method for presurgical evaluation of renal arteries in potential donors, providing valuable information required by the surgeon. But, as the technique misses small-diameter vessels, it cannot be recommended as the sole diagnostic tool in unclear cases.

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in living renal donors: diagnostic agreement, impact on decision making, and costs.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement, the impact on decision making, and the costs of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the workup of living renal donors. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the preoperative evaluation of renal donors is superior to digital subtraction angiography in revealing vascular anomalies and depicting parenchymal abnormalities and is less costly; furthermore, it does not lead to preoperative decisions that differ from those based on digital subtraction angiography. If contrast-enhanced MR angiography does not provide sufficient information to make a confident decision, an additional digital subtraction angiography examination should be performed.

Quantitative assessment of the morphology of renal arteries from X-ray images: quantitative vascular analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: With the advent of interventional vascular procedures, objective and reproducible tools are needed to assist clinical decision-making and to assess intervention efficacy. The success of quantitative coronary arteriography (QVA) in objectively assessing cardiovascular morphology has initiated the software development for quantitative analysis of peripheral vasculature. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability and quality of a new QVA package applied to renal arteries. METHODS: A calibration method was developed using markers mounted on a catheter's shaft, ensuring accurate calibration even with small catheter sizes. Given the high prevalence of ostial stenoses in peripheral vessels, a dedicated vessel analysis method was developed to assess these stenoses. Its reproducibility was determined in renal angiography. Variance component analysis was performed to evaluate sources of variability, using angiograms from 74 patients suspected of renovascular hypertension. RESULTS: For intraobserver variability, the 95% confidence intervals of differences in percent diameter stenosis and minimal lumen diameter were -1.99%-1.04% (P = 0.53, n = 48) and -0.081 mm-0.023 mm (P = 0.27, n = 48), respectively. For the interobserver variability, intervals were -1.86%-2.80% (P = 0.69, n = 66) and -0.46 mm-0.053 mm (P = 0.12, n = 46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of intraobserver variation was negligible. The contribution of interobserver variation for different parameters was negligible or comparable with the variation caused by image acquisition. These conclusions demonstrate that QVA can reproducibly measure renal artery geometry.

[Magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries]. / Angiographie par résonance magnétique des artères rénales.

Initially, the clinical use of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the abdomen has been restricted because of motion and flow related artifacts. The advent of high performance gradient systems made possible the development of 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRA techniques and expanded the clinical applications of MRA into the abdominal area, particularly for the investigation of renal arteries. This technique is safe, because the administered contrast agent (gadolinium) is free of clinically detectable nephrotoxicity and has a low incidence of allergic reactions. Moreover, contrast MRA also eliminates the risks of ionizing radiation which allows repeating the examination without the accumulation of radiation exposure. The main disadvantages of the technique are its low availability and the fact that the use of contrast agents for this procedure is still not reimbursed by the social security. Many studies demonstrated that contrast MRA allows for the reliable assessment of renal artery morphology and pathologic states. Furthermore, within a single MR examination a comprehensive approach including renal artery morphology, hemodynamic significance of any stenosis and kidney perfusion is available. In this paper, we provide a review of the literature concerning the clinical performance of contrast MRA for the renal arteries and suggest its rationale for the investigation of patients suspected of renovascular disease in our specific environment.

The use of spiral computed tomographic angiography for the assessment of living kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography can replace conventional angiography and intravenous urography for the assessment of potential kidney donors. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of spiral CT in potential kidney donor workup. METHODS: Over a period of 1 year, from December 1995 to December 1996, 16 consecutive potential renal donors had intravenous pyelography, percutaneous transfemoral angiography with selective renal angiography and spiral CT angiography. The spiral CT and renal angiograms were assessed independently by two radiologists. The number of renal arteries, presence or absence of renal artery stenoses and associated parenchymal abnormalities were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 39 renal arteries were detected. Conventional transverse scans viewed in a cine loop format detected all 39 vessels, while the maximum intensity projection and shaded surface display demonstrated only 37. All 39 vessels were detected by the catheter angiography. With the exception of one potential donor with fibromuscular dysplasia, 15 donors were accepted. There was 100% accuracy between the two methods of visualization for the renal arteries. A simple renal cyst was noted in both spiral CT and conventional angiogram, while another had gallstones in spiral CT. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral CT angiography performed as an outpatient procedure is less invasive, less expensive, and provides good images of the arterial and venous anatomy. It has the potential to replace conventional catheter angiography and intravenous pyelogram in the assessment of potential renal donors.

A sonographic assessment of neonatal renal parameters.

One hundred twenty infants ranging in weight from 600 to 4,000 grams were entered into a prospective sonographic study to establish normal renal growth parameters. Renal cortical echogenicity was demonstrated to decrease with increasing infant weight. Observations on the use of Doppler analysis for assessing renal vascular flow are presented.