Dynamic Stress Ultrasound Assessment of Professional Baseball Players' Elbows After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data analyzing dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) findings in elite pitchers who have undergone ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) and returned to sport. PURPOSE: To identify longitudinal, perioperative changes in the elbows of professional baseball pitchers who have undergone UCLR and to compare these findings with a matched cohort of healthy pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study used prospectively collected data from dynamic elbow SUS analyses of professional baseball pitchers within a single Major League Baseball organization. Pitchers were divided into 2 cohorts: a UCLR cohort and healthy cohort. The UCLR cohort eligibility included availability of (1) SUS from preseason of injury/UCLR and (2) SUS from ≥2 years after surgery. These players were 1:1 matched to players with no history of upper extremity injury to form the healthy cohort. Ligament thickness and ulnohumeral joint space at rest and under stress were directly measured. Joint laxity was calculated by subtracting joint space at rest from joint space under stress. The term "relative" was used to describe calculated differences where nondominant measurements were subtracted from dominant-side measurements. RESULTS: Eight pitchers were included in the UCLR group and matched to 8 healthy pitchers (mean age at initial SUS examination, 19.6 years). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of relative or dominant arm rest space, stress space, or laxity. Longitudinally (final measurements - baseline measurements), the mean relative ulnohumeral rest space decreased in the UCLR group and increased in the healthy group (-0.36 mm vs +0.50 mm; P = .032). The finding of increased UCL thickness in the UCLR group was expected, as UCL grafts are typically thicker than native ligaments. CONCLUSION: Ulnhohumeral joint stability was achieved after UCLR as indicated by similar rest space, stress space, and joint laxity in dominant arms compared with a matched healthy cohort. A significant decrease in relative rest space after UCLR may represent the achievement of stability in surgery patients. Alternatively, the increase in ulnohumeral rest space seen in the healthy cohort may represent adaptive changes from pitching at a professional level.

Arthroscopic assessment for lateral collateral ligament complex deficiency of the elbow: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy. METHODS: Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (UHJ) gap (mm) were measured with different sizes of probes from the posterolateral viewing portal. The elbow was 90 degrees flexed with neutral forearm rotation for RCJ gap measurement and 30 degrees flexed with full supination for UHJ gap measurement. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0: intact; Stage 1: the release of the anterior 1/3 LCL complex; Stage 2: the release of the anterior two thirds of the LCL complex; and Stage 3: the release of the entire LCL complex) on each specimen. The mean gap of RCJ and lateral UHJ was used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow. RESULTS: The mean RCJ gap distance in Stage 2 and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .008; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .010). The mean UHJ gap distance of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 1: P = 0.025; Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P = .010; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P = .011). In contrast, the release of the anterior 1/3 of the LCL complex (Stage 1) was not significantly increased compared to the mean joint gap distance of RCJ (P = .157). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic measurement of joint gap widening in RCJ and UHJ is a reliable assessment method to detect LCL complex deficiency that involves the anterior two thirds or more.

Assessment of progression and clinical relevance of stress-shielding around press-fit radial head arthroplasty.

Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze how proximal radial neck resorption (PRNR) starts and progresses radiologically in two types of press-fit radial head arthroplasties (RHAs), and to investigate its clinical relevance. Methods: A total of 97 patients with RHA were analyzed: 56 received a bipolar RHA (Group 1) while 41 received an anatomical implant (Group 2). Radiographs were performed postoperatively and after three, six, nine, and 12 weeks, six, nine, 12, 18, and 24 months, and annually thereafter. PRNR was measured in all radiographs in the four radial neck quadrants. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the patient-assessed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score - Elbow (pASES-E) were used for the clinical assessment. Radiological signs of implant loosening were investigated. Results: The mean follow-up was six years (2 to 14). PRNR started after a mean of 7.5 weeks (SD 2.1) and progressed significantly during the first two years, by the end of which the bone resorption stabilized. PRNR was detected in 81% (n = 45) of patients in Group 1 and 88% (n = 36) in Group 2. The final mean PRNR was 3.0 mm (SD 2.3) in Group 1 and 3.7 mm (SD 2.5) in Group 2. The mean MEPS, QuickDASH, and pASES-E were 95.9 (SD 11.5), 4.4 (SD 9.2), and 94.8 (SD 10.9) in Group 1 and 92.2 (SD 16.2), 9.9 (SD 21.5), and 90.8 (SD 15) in Group 2, respectively. No significant differences were observed between groups in the clinical and radiological outcomes. No correlations were found between PRNR and the clinical results. Conclusion: PRNR after press-fit RHA is a common radiological finding that develops in the first 24 months before stabilizing definitively. PRNR does not affect the clinical results or implant survival in the mid term.

Assessment of Instant Loss of Elbow Flexion in Children with Untreated Gartland IIA Humeral Supracondylar Fractures-A Simulation Study with Lateral Elbow Radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: The suitability of in situ cast fixation for treating Gartland IIA humeral supracondylar fractures has remained controversial due to concerns regarding loss of elbow flexion. This study aimed to assess the instant loss of elbow flexion after Gartland IIA humeral supracondylar fractures based on the relationship between the anterior marginal line of the humerus and capitellum in the lateral view. METHODS: This simulation study was conducted with normal radiographs using Adobe Photoshop 14.0, followed by verification using clinical cases. Standard lateral views of normal elbows of children were collected from January 2008 to February 2020. Adobe Photoshop was used to simulate Gartland IIA supracondylar fractures with different degrees of angulation in the sagittal plane. A formula was deduced to assess flexion loss, and this method was verified in three cases. The data were grouped by age, and the relationship between elbow flexion loss and age, as well as the angulation of the fracture, was analyzed using a one-way or multivariate ANOVA. RESULTS: There was a flexion loss of 19° (11-30°) when the anterior margin line of the humerus was tangential to the capitellum. This loss increased with age at injury (r = 0.731, P = 0.000). Moreover, the difference in angulation in the sagittal plane also influenced the extent of elbow flexion loss (r = -0.739, P = 0.000). The more horizontal the fracture line in the lateral view, the greater the loss of elbow flexion. CONCLUSION: Instant elbow flexion loss after Gartland IIA humeral supracondylar fractures increases with age at the time of injury and decreases with angulation in the sagittal plane. When the anterior margin of the humerus is tangential to the capitellum, there will be an average loss of 19° in elbow flexion. These findings provide a quantitative reference for clinical decision-making in the treatment of Gartland IIA supracondylar fractures.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Cartilage Appearance Following Marrow Stimulation of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Humeral Capitellum.

PURPOSE: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is often treated by marrow stimulation techniques with good long-term outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to characterize the healing of cartilage repair tissue. However, no formal system exists for assessment of cartilage healing after marrow stimulation in capitellar OCD. The aims of this study were to describe the postoperative MRI appearance of capitellar repair cartilage after debridement and marrow stimulation for capitellar OCD and assess differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with capitellar OCD who underwent arthroscopic debridement and marrow stimulation and had a postoperative MRI to assess healing. The classification system developed by Marlovits and colleagues (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) was used to quantitatively profile the cartilage repair tissue in comparison to adjacent "normal" cartilage. Study participants completed an online survey to correlate outcomes with cartilage appearance. RESULTS: Eleven patients who underwent MRI for routine evaluation (asymptomatic), and 18 who underwent MRI for symptoms were identified. Overall, 59% of defects were completely filled, and in 83%, the cartilage surface had ulcerations or fibrillations. The cartilage variables were similar between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Capitellar subchondral bone edema was observed on the MRI of every patient who underwent a reoperation and was present in only 62% of those who did not. Clinical scores did not correlate with MRI cartilage findings, but the small sample size limited conclusions regarding clinical outcomes related to postoperative cartilage features seen on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: This detailed assessment of cartilage appearance by MRI after marrow stimulation for capitellar OCD demonstrated that incomplete cartilage fill was common in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Those requiring a second surgery were more likely to demonstrate subchondral bone edema. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.

Minimally Displaced Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures: Optimizing Follow-up and Minimizing Cost.

BACKGROUND: Minimally displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle (LHC) may be treated nonoperatively in a long arm cast, but there is not a standardized evidence-based protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate our nonoperatively treated LHC fractures, determine the risk of subsequent displacement, analyze our practice variability, and develop an evidence-based protocol to safely manage children with LHC fractures and to evaluate potential savings related to this analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic parameters of all patients with LHC fractures at our institution from 2009 to 2015. All patients treated nonoperatively initially were included. We recorded demographic data and calculated the number of visits, casts applied, and radiographs within the first 4 weeks. We also analyzed practice variation among 27 treating providers. The number of children with subsequent displacement needing operative fixation was determined. We also looked at the average duration for each follow-up visit and the charges/costs associated with casting and radiographs. RESULTS: There were 271 children with LHC fractures treated nonoperatively. Twenty-one were excluded because of the lack of adequate radiographs. There were 157 boys and 93 girls (average age 6.7 y). According to the Jakob classification, fracture types were as follows: 1 (230), 2 (20), and 3 (0). Within the first 4 weeks, the average number of visits was 2.6 (range: 1 to 5), average number of casts was 2.4 (range: 1 to 4), and the average number of radiographs was 9.4 (range: 2 to 31). Only 3 patients with LHC fracture type Jakob 1 were taken to the operating room post injury (9, 12, and 15 d, respectively) for subsequent displacement. CONCLUSION: Displacement in appropriately selected LHC fractures treated nonoperatively was rare (3/250, 1.2%) in this cohort, and the data question the need for multiple visits and radiographs in the first 4 weeks. Optimal follow-up (proposed follow-up at 10 to 15 d after injury and then 4 to 6 wk with radiographs, including an internal oblique view) would be safe, minimize waste, and result in better value-based care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Using External Joint Stabilizer - Elbow (EJS-E) for treating elbow instability-biomechanical assessment and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of using an External Joint Stabilizer - Elbow (EJS-E) for persistent elbow instability based on biomechanical experiments and analysis of clinical results. METHODS: An EJS-E was used in 17 elbow instability patients. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 12-42 months). We evaluated the flexion-extension and pronation-supination movement arcs, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Broberg and Morrey classification system, and occurrence of complications in these patients. Moreover, construct stiffness and maximum strength tests were performed to evaluate the strength of the fixation techniques. RESULTS: The final median range of the extension-to-flexion and pronation-to-supination arc of the elbow was 135° (range, 110°-150°) and 165° (range, 125°-180°), respectively. The VAS pain scores were > 3 in two patients. The median MEPS was 90 (range, 80-100 points). Five patients showed signs of grade I post-traumatic osteoarthritis according to the Broberg and Morrey radiographic classification system, while grade II changes were observed in three patients. Complications included axis pin loosening with pin-tract infection in two patients, transient ulnar nerve symptoms in two patients, heterotopic ossification in two patients, and suture anchors infection in one patient. Based on the biomechanical testing results, the EJS-E exhibited higher stiffness and resisting force in varus loading. It was 0.5 (N/mm) stiffer and 1.8 (N·m) stronger than the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) by difference of medians (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical and clinical outcomes show that EJS-E via the posterior approach can restore mobility and stability in all patients, thus serving as a valuable alternative option for the treatment of persistent instability of the elbow.

Ultrasonography: an interesting imaging method for ligament assessment during the acute phase of closed elbow injuries.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ultrasonography can be used to explore the medial and lateral ligament structures during the acute phase of a closed elbow injury. METHODS: A single-center, prospective study performed between December 2019 and June 2020, including patients who suffered a radial head fracture or elbow dislocation. Two radiologists did a blinded analysis using ultrasonography of visibility, injury grade, and presence of bone avulsion for the radial collateral ligament (RCL), lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), annular ligament (AL), and anterior (MCLant) and posterior bundles (MCLpost) of the medial collateral ligament. The inter-rater agreement was calculated. The ultrasonography findings were compared with the intraoperative findings in the patients who subsequently underwent surgery. RESULTS: Forty patients were included (28 radial head fractures and 12 elbow dislocations). The inter-rater agreement was strong for all the study parameters (kappa between 0.65 and 1), except for the visibility of the LUCL (kappa 0.52) and the visibility and appearance of the MCLpost (kappa 0.54 and 0.47, respectively). The injured ligaments were thicker than their contralateral counterparts (p < 0.05). In the 10 patients who underwent surgery, the radiological-surgical correlation was 100% for the RCL and medial ligaments and 70% for the LUCL. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is a reproducible examination that can be used to assess the damage to elbow ligaments during the acute phase following an injury. This examination could be incorporated into the exploration protocol for elbow injuries during the preoperative assessment and to adapt the treatment.

Pediatric Monteggia Fracture Outcome Assessment - Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: The term Monteggia fracture refers to a class of injuries encompassing the fracture of the proximal end of the ulna with subluxation or dislocation of the radial head. These injuries account for 0.4-1% of all forearm fractures in children. Despite its low incidence, Monteggia fractures require particular attention, since as much as 30-50% of the cases may be unrecognized, which subsequently leads to complications. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate treatment outcomes of Monteggia fractures in children. Both conservative treatment and surgery were analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15 children (7 boys and 8 girls) between the ages of 4-16.3 years (mean age 8.3 years) with Monteggia fractures were hospitalized at our center in the years 2015-2020. Closed reduction and immobilization in a cast were performed in 12 patients, while three children underwent surgical treatment with internal fixation of the ulna. The radial head dislocation was reduced successfully in every patient. RESULTS: Every child from the study group who received conservative treatment regained full elbow mobility as well as normal forearm supination and pronation. Only one of the patients who underwent the surgery demonstrated a 20° deficit in elbow flexion that did not affect limb function. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Our experience shows that closed reduction together with immobilization in a cast is usually a sufficient treatment in Monteggia fractures. 2. However, the dislocated radial head should be properly reduced in all patients. 3. Correct diagnosis and treatment followed by appropriate rehabilitation result in full recovery and no mobility limitations in children and teenagers.

Tentative Assessment of Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures are a serious problem in children. The complicated anatomy of the elbow joint necessitates careful assessment of the damage before individually adapting treatment methods. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive treatment of children in Group A in relation to children in Group B. Moreover, the impact of rehabilitation on the function of the affected elbow joint was examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 40 children divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. In Group A, the dominant method of treatment was percutaneous K-wire stabilization. The results demonstrate that the use of this treatment method and the implementation of systematic rehabilitation made it possible to achieve very good results. In Group B, stabilization was performed in less than half of the children and rehabilitation was carried out at home. The initial and follow-up examinations were carried out in both groups according to a medical test card. In Group A, the initial examination was performed on the day the rehabilitation commenced, and the follow-up examination after the completion of a 10-day rehabilitation cycle. In Group B, the initial examination was carried out after immobilization was removed and a follow-up examination was performed after 3 weeks of home-based rehabilitation. RESULTS: The treatment model used in Group A was more effective than the model used in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Correct repositioning, the use of percutaneous K-wire stabilization and elbow rehabilitation performed at the earliest possible time give very good functional results. 2. The use of percutaneous stabilization shortens the hospitalization period, which is of great importance in the treatment of young patients.

Cost Assessment of Plating Versus Tension Band Wiring Constructs for Treating Mayo Type 2A Olecranon Fractures.

PURPOSE: Tension band wiring (TBW) or plating may be used for fixation with similar clinical outcomes for adults with displaced Mayo 2A olecranon fractures. The primary hypothesis is that total direct costs (TDCs) for surgery are lower for TBW than plating. Our secondary hypothesis is that combined surgical TDCs are lower for TBW even with a 100% rate of subsequent tension band hardware removal and a 0% rate of plate removal. METHODS: Patients who underwent TBW or plating of an isolated unilateral Mayo 2A olecranon fracture between July 2011 and January 2020 at a single academic medical center were identified. Then, TDC for each surgery on plate fixation, TBW, and hardware removal was obtained and converted to 2020 US dollars using information technology cost tools provided by our institution. Finally, relative TDCs were compared between plate fixation and TBW groups using univariate and multivariable generalized estimating equations with log-link. RESULTS: Of the 97 included patients, the mean age was 50 ± 21 years, and 48% were female. Tension band wiring and plate fixation were performed on 18% (17/97) and 82% (80/97) of male and female patients, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups, although the finding that plate fixation cost 2.6 times that of TBW within the index surgery was significant in the multivariable model, independent of potential confounders (coefficient 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 2.09-3.10). Additionally, mean TDC remained significantly greater for plate fixation even under the hypothetical situation where 100% TBW were removed, and the plate removal rate was 0% (cost difference 181%). CONCLUSIONS: Using TBW relative to plate fixation may improve the cost of care for operative Mayo 2A olecranon fractures. Furthermore, this finding was robust to the rate of hardware removal. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analyses III.

Humerus trochlear angle (HTa)-a possible alternative for Baumann angle in the reduction of supracondylar humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: The supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common fracture in children's elbows. Generally, close reduction and percutaneous pinning can provide satisfactory outcomes after adequate reduction. Baumann angle is commonly used to evaluate reduction quality, however, it may fail to assess reduction well when the elbow is in flexion and/or when the patient is young. We conducted this study to evaluate the potential value of the humerus trochlear angle (HTa) for the reduction evaluation and compare it with the Baumann angle. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed supracondylar humerus fractures in our trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Patients were grouped as followed: in the HTa group, an arthrogram was used to evaluate the HTa angle and reduction (HTa, defined by the intersection of the axis of the humerus shaft and the tangent of the articular surface of the trochlear); In the Baumann group, the Baumann angle was used to assess the reduction. Baumann angle ratio (BA of injured side/BA of contralateral side) was calculated to evaluate the reduction quality between groups. Flynn's grading criteria were utilized to evaluate both function and cosmetic outcomes in two groups during the follow-up. Operation time, fluoroscopy shots, complications and Flynn's grading scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients with an average age of 4.62 years and follow-up duration of 21.49 ± 5.40 months were included in the analysis. The gender and age distributions were similar in the two groups. Fluoroscopy shots in the HTa group were significantly less than in Baumann group (16.17 ± 0.73 vs. 21.85 ± 0.78, p < 0.0001), and operation time were also less in HTa group (45.78 ± 1.96 min vs. 62.21 ± 1.58 min, p < 0.0001). Baumann ratio showed no significant difference between the two groups (1.002 ± 0.023 in the Baumann group and 1.01 ± 0.023 in HTa group, p < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization, complications, and Flynn's grading scores were similar between groups. The HTa angle was positively correlated with Baumann angle in the HTa group (R-value is 0.71 and P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in reduction quality and Flynn's scores between HTa and Baumann groups. Furthermore, HTa was associated with shorter operation time and less radiation exposure in this investigation. Therefore, HTa may be a convenient and reliable parameter that could guide the reduction of supracondylar humerus fractures, especially for young children.

Incidence and Management of Articular Impaction in Geriatric Olecranon Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Olecranon fractures are common in the elderly. Articular impaction is encountered occasionally, but the incidence and outcomes after treatment of this injury pattern have not been well characterized. METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of geriatric olecranon fractures to determine the incidence of articular impaction and describe a technique for open reduction and internal fixation. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients in our series, 31 had associated intraarticular impaction (49.2%). Patients with articular impaction did not have significantly different rates of postoperative complications (11/31, 35.5% versus 10/31, 32.3%; P = 1.00) or revision surgery (10/31, 32.3% versus 8/31, 25.8%; P = 0.780) compared with those without articular impaction. CONCLUSION: Articular impaction is a common feature of geriatric olecranon fractures. Surgeons must maintain a high index of suspicion and have a surgical plan in place for managing this component of the injury.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Humeral Capitellum: Preoperative Assessment of Lesion Size and Lateral Wall Integrity.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a helpful tool in the evaluation of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum. The relationship between MRI appearance and clinically relevant intraoperative findings is incompletely understood. The goal of this study was to evaluate capitellar OCD lesions via preoperative MRI and to determine its accuracy in predicting lesion characteristics including lesion size and capitellar lateral wall integrity. METHODS: Patients surgically treated for capitellar OCD between January 2010 and June 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative MRI images were assessed by a musculoskeletal radiologist with documentation of lesion size, location, violation of the lateral wall, and stage, in accordance with previously established criteria. These data were compared with intraoperative findings. Involvement of the lateral wall of the capitellum was defined using 2 methods: (1) subchondral edema or articular cartilage disruption in the lateral third of the capitellum (lateral third method) or (2) disruption of the proximal-distal subchondral line along the lateral border of the capitellum descending vertically before the subchondral bone turns horizontally to form the radiocapitellar articulation (capitellar lateral wall sign method). Diagnostic test characteristics were compared for both methods. RESULTS: We reviewed the preoperative MRIs of 33 elbows with capitellar OCD and found no significant difference in mean lesion size between preoperative MRI (1.12 cm2) and intraoperative measurement (1.08 cm2). For detection of lateral wall integrity, preoperative MRI evaluation using the capitellar lateral wall sign method had an accuracy of 93%, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MRI is a valid predictor of lesion size. The capitellar lateral wall sign method is highly accurate in the identification of lateral wall involvement, which may influence preoperative planning. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Reassessment of Relative Value in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery: Do Payment and Relative Value Units Reflect Reality?

BACKGROUD: Many U.S. health care institutions have adopted compensation models based on work relative value units (wRVUs) to standardize payments and incentivize providers. A major determinant of payment and wRVU assignments is operative time. We sought to determine whether differences in estimated operative times between the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) contribute to payment and wRVU misvaluation for the most common shoulder/elbow procedures. METHODS: We collected data on wRVUs, payments, and operative times from CMS for 29 types of isolated arthroscopic and open shoulder/elbow procedures. Using regression analysis, we compared relationships between these variables, in addition to median operative times reported by NSQIP (2013-2016). We then determined the relative valuation of each procedure based on operative time. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of CMS operative time were longer than NSQIP time (R2 = 0.58), including, but not limited to, shoulder arthroplasty and arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The correlation between payments and operative times was stronger between CMS data (R2 = 0.61) than NSQIP data (R2 = 0.43). Similarly, the correlation between wRVUs and operative times was stronger when using CMS data (R2 = 0.87) than NSQIP data (R2 = 0.69). Nearly all arthroscopic shoulder procedures (aside from synovectomy, debridement, and decompression) were highly valued according to both datasets. Per NSQIP, compensation for revision total shoulder arthroplasty ($10.14/min; 0.26 wRVU/min) was higher than that for primary cases ($9.85, 0.23 wRVU/min) and nearly twice the CMS rate for revision cases ($5.84/min; 0.13 wRVU/min). CONCLUSIONS: CMS may overestimate operative times compared to actual operative times as recorded by NSQIP. Shorter operative times may render certain procedures more highly valued than others. Case examples show that this can potentially affect patient care and incentivize higher compensating procedures per operative time when less-involved, shorter operations have similar patient-reported outcomes.

Reoperation Rates and Costs of Radial Head Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Radial Head and Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Database Study.

Background: We conducted a retrospective study to compare reoperation/conversion rates and costs between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA) in patients with radial head/neck fractures. Methods: We examined the Humana Orthopedic data sets using the PearlDiver Application from January 2007 to June 2016 to identify patients with radial head and neck fractures with and without a concurrent elbow dislocation. Time to revision surgery, odds ratios, and survival curves for reoperations/conversions were calculated comparing ORIF and RHA. Results: A total of 7520 patients were identified who had undergone either ORIF or RHA. Overall, ORIF patients were less likely to undergo a conversion procedure (2.76% vs 7.03%) but more likely to undergo any reoperation (21.36% vs 17.63%) with a higher average cost ($19 688.46 vs $11 626.64). Patients who underwent ORIF without a concurrent elbow dislocation were also less likely to undergo a conversion procedure (2.12% vs 7.24%) but more likely to undergo any reoperation (20.22% vs 16.99%) with a higher average cost ($19 420.21 vs $11 123.61). Patients who underwent ORIF with a concurrent elbow dislocation were more likely to undergo both a conversion procedure (15.86% vs 6.39%) and any reoperation (44.98% vs 19.63%) with a higher average cost per patient ($24 999.62 vs $13 192.00). The average time to reoperation/conversion surgery was less than a year for all patient groups. Conclusions: Overall reoperation rates are high in patients undergoing operative treatment of radial head and neck fractures. RHA is less expensive and has fewer reoperations/conversions in short-term follow-up when compared with ORIF in radial head/neck fracture dislocations of the elbow.

Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with single-strand suture augmentation has been introduced as a viable surgical option for throwers with acute UCL tears. For the original single-strand suture augmentation construct, revision UCL reconstructions can be challenging owing to the bone loss at the site of anchor insertion in the center of the sublime tubercle. This biomechanical study assessed a small-diameter (1.5-mm) ulnar bone tunnel technique for double-strand suture-augmented UCL repair that may be more easily converted to salvage UCL reconstruction if necessary, as well as a salvage UCL reconstruction with a docking technique after a failed primary suture-augmented UCL repair. METHODS: In 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age, 66.3 years), a custom shoulder testing system was used to simulate the late cocking phase of throwing. The elbow valgus opening angle was evaluated using a MicroScribe 3DLX device for sequentially increasing valgus torque (from 0.75 to 7.5 Nm in 0.75-Nm increments) at 90° of flexion. Valgus angular stiffness (in newton-meters per degree) was defined as the correlation of sequentially increasing valgus torque with the valgus opening angle through simple linear regression (slope of valgus torque - valgus opening angle curve). Four conditions were tested: intact elbow, distal UCL avulsion, primary UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation using small-diameter bone tunnels, and subsequent docking UCL reconstruction in the same specimen. Load-to-failure tests were performed for primary UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation and subsequent docking UCL reconstruction. RESULTS: With increasing elbow valgus torque, the valgus opening angle increased linearly in each condition (R2 ≥ 0.98, P < .001). Distal UCL avulsion resulted in significantly decreased angular stiffness compared with the intact UCL (P < .001). Both UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation and subsequent UCL reconstruction showed significantly increased angular stiffness values compared with distal UCL avulsion (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). On load-to-failure testing, there was no significant difference in stiffness, yield torque, and ultimate torque between the primary suture-augmented UCL repair and the subsequent UCL reconstruction (P = .11, P = .77, and P = .38, respectively). In all specimens undergoing the small-diameter ulnar bone tunnel technique for double-strand suture-augmented UCL repair, failure occurred by retear of the repaired ligament without causing an ulnar bone bridge fracture. CONCLUSION: Primary UCL repair with double-strand suture augmentation using small-diameter bone tunnels was able to restore valgus stability. When failure occurs, this technique retains enough cortical bone to permit subsequent docking UCL reconstruction.

Management of anteromedial coronoid fractures according to a protocol focused on instability assessment provides good outcomes with infrequent need for coronoid fixation.

BACKGROUND: Anteromedial coronoid fractures (AMCFs) are associated with persistent elbow instability and post-traumatic arthritis if managed incorrectly. It is unclear exactly which AMCFs require surgical intervention and how to make this decision. The aims of this study were to report outcomes of AMCFs managed using a protocol based on reproduction of instability using radiographic and clinical testing and to ascertain a threshold size of AMCF associated with instability. METHODS: Forty-three AMCFs were studied. Thirty-two patients formed the primary study group (group A). All were treated using a protocol in which the decision to perform coronoid fixation was based on the presence of radiographic or clinical evidence of instability. Functional outcomes (Oxford Elbow Score), radiographic outcomes, complications, and reoperations were collected, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the optimal coronoid fracture height to recommend coronoid fixation. The results were compared with a historical group of 11 patients with AMCFs not treated according to the protocol (group B). RESULTS: Of the patients, 23 had an isolated AMCF and 20 had a concurrent radial head injury. Complete nonoperative treatment of the elbow was performed in 16 patients (37%) (11 of 32 [34%] in group A vs. 5 of 11 [45%] in group B, P = .46). In 10 patients (23%), only repair of the lateral collateral ligament was performed (9 in group A and 1 in group B), whereas 8 patients (19%) underwent repair of the lateral collateral ligament and radial head fixation or replacement (6 in group A and 2 in group B). Acute coronoid fixation was performed in 9 patients (21%) (6 in group A and 3 in group B). At a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 12-56 months), group A showed a significantly better Oxford Elbow Score (42 vs. 31, P = .02), lower complication rate (3 of 32 [9%] vs. 8 of 11 [72%], P < .001), and lower reoperation rate (1 of 32 [3%] vs. 6 of 11 [54%], P < .001) than group B. Persistent instability was found in 6 patients in group B and none in group A. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated 6.5 mm to be the optimal AMCF size for surgery to prevent persistent instability. CONCLUSION: Patients treated according to a protocol in which preoperative reproduction of instability determined the degree of surgical intervention had good clinical and radiographic outcomes. Our study demonstrated that AMCFs > 6.5 mm are likely to be more unstable and require intervention. If these principles are followed, a specifically defined subset of AMCFs can be treated nonsurgically without adverse outcomes.

The ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures? An economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The ideal implant for stable, noncomminuted olecranon fractures is controversial. Tension band wiring (TBW) is associated with lower cost but higher implant removal rates.On the other hand, plate fixation (PF) is purported to be biomechanically superior, with lower failure and implant removal rates, although associated with higher cost. The primary aim of this study is to look at the clinical outcomes for all Mayo 2A olecranon between PF and TBW. The secondary aim is to perform an economic evaluation of PF vs. TBW. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all surgically treated Mayo 2A olecranon fractures in a tertiary hospital from 2005-2016. Demographic data, medical history, range of motion, and complications were collected. All inpatient and outpatient costs in a 1-year period postsurgery including the index surgical procedure were collected via the hospital administrative cost database (normalized to 2014). RESULTS: A total of 147 cases were identified (94 TBW, 53 PF). PF was associated with higher mean age (P < .01), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < .01), and higher proportion of hypertensives (P = .04). There was no difference in the range of motion achieved at 1 year for both groups. In terms of complications, TBW was associated with more symptomatic hardware (21.6% vs. 13.7%, P = .24) and implant failures (16.5% vs. none, P < .01), whereas the plate group had a higher wound complication (5.9% vs. none, P = .02) and infection rate (9.8% vs. 3.1%, P = .09). TBW had a higher implant removal rate of 30.9% compared with 22.7% for PF (P = .36). PF had a higher cost at all time points, from the index surgery ($10,313.64 vs. $5896.36, P < .01), 1-year cost excluding index surgery ($5069.61 vs. $3850.46, P = .46), and outpatient cost ($1667.80 vs. $1613.49, P = .27). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Based on our study results, we have demonstrated that TBW is the ideal implant for Mayo 2A olecranon fractures from both a clinical and economic standpoint, with comparable clinical results, potentially similar implant removal rates as PF's, and a lower cost over a 1-year period. In choosing the ideal implant, the surgeon must take into account, first, the local TBW and PF removal rate, which can vary significantly because of the patient's profile and beliefs, and second, the PF implant cost.