Prevalence of anxiety and depression and the association with self-management behaviour in >12 000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: a cross-sectional nationwide study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of anxiety and depression among patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and evaluate the association of these mental health issues with self-management behaviour. METHODS: In this nationwide cross-sectional study, we analysed data from 12 713 adult Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA). Patients received an electronic questionnaire covering sociodemographics, self-management behaviour and mental health status. Questionnaire data were linked to clinical data from the Danish Rheumatology database (DANBIO) and the Danish National Patient Registry. The prevalence of anxiety and depression (by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D)) was estimated separately for RA/PsA/SpA. The association between mental health status and low self-management behaviour (adherence to treatment, health activation and physical activity) was estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, educational level and comorbidity. RESULTS: The prevalence of anxiety (HADS-A≥8) was highest for patients with SpA (34.5% (95% CI 32.4% to 36.6%)) and lowest for patients with RA (22.1% (95% CI 21.2% to 23.0%)), it was higher for women, younger (<55 years) and recently diagnosed (<3 years) patients and those with basic education. Similar prevalence estimates were found for depression. Across diagnoses, the clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS≥8) were significantly associated with low self-management behaviour. CONCLUSION: Patients with IA showed substantial levels of anxiety and depression. A statistically significant association between anxiety and depression and low self-management behaviour was identified. These findings call for a systematic approach to identifying mental health issues in patients with IA.

Screening for Anxiety in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis Using the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) in screening for anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), compared to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as the reference standard. METHODS: Patients with a physician diagnosis of RA or PsA were invited to complete the MDHAQ and HADS at their routine rheumatology clinic visit. Sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement, and [Formula: see text] statistics were used to evaluate agreement between 2 MDHAQ items for anxiety and HADS subscale for Anxiety (HADS-A) score of ≥ 8. The first item is a question asked on a 4-point scale (0-3.3), and the second is a yes or no (blank) question asked within a 60-item review of symptoms (ROS) checklist. RESULTS: The study included 183 participants, of whom 126 (68.9%) had RA and 57 (31.1%) had PsA. The mean age was 57.3 years and 66.7% were female. Positive screening for anxiety according to a HADS-A score of ≥ 8 was seen in 39.3% of patients. Compared to those with a HADS-A score of ≥ 8, patients with an MDHAQ score of ≥ 2.2 or a positive on ROS had a sensitivity of 69.9%, specificity of 73.6% and substantial agreement (agreement 80.9%, [Formula: see text] 0.59). CONCLUSION: The MDHAQ provides information similar to the HADS in screening for anxiety in patients with RA and PsA. The use of this single questionnaire, which can also be used to monitor clinical status and to screen for fibromyalgia and depression without requiring multiple questionnaires, may prove a valuable tool in routine clinical practice.

Assessment of autonomic dysfunction with the COMPASS-31 and its relationship with disease activity and cardiovascular risks in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

This study aimed to evaluate the autonomic dysfunction as assessed by the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31) as well as its relationship with disease activity and cardiovascular risks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This cross-sectional observational study involved 118 PsA patients (85 females, mean age 45.6 years) and 64 healthy subjects. Cardiovascular risks were recorded including body mass index (BMI), hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and 10-year Framingham Risk scores (FRS) were calculated. PsA was assessed with regard to disease activity, quality of life, and function. Autonomic dysfunction was evaluated using the COMPASS-31 consisting of six subdivisions including orthostatic, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder, and pupillomotor functions. The mean disease duration was 63.3 months. The mean total COMPASS-31 score was significantly higher in PsA patients than in controls (24.4 vs 11.1; p < 0.001), as were all sub-domain scores. COMPASS-31 scores were significantly lower in patients with DAPSA-REM and MDA. The COMPASS-31 total score showed significant correlations with scores of pain, global assessment, fatigue, function, quality of life, DAPSA, and BASDAI (p < 0.05).The presence of HT, dyslipidemia, MetS, and abdominal obesity did not significantly affect the total COMPASS-31 and sub-domain scores, except for the secretomotor scores being significantly higher in patients with abdominal obesity and MetS (p < 0.05). COMPASS-31 scores were not significantly different across the FRS risk groups. The symptoms of autonomic dysfunction are prevalent in PsA patients. High disease activity and pain have negative effects on autonomic function, and also functional impairment, fatigue, and poor quality of life are associated with autonomic dysfunction. However, the COMPASS-31 was found to be insufficient to demonstrate a clear relationship between autonomic dysfunction and cardiovascular risk.

Telemedicine in the Management of Patients with Rheumatic Disease during COVID-19 Pandemic: Incidence of Psychiatric Disorders and Fibromyalgia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

The management of patients with immuno-rheumatological diseases has profoundly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine has played an important role in the disease follow-up. In addition to monitoring disease activity and any adverse events, especially infectious events, assessing the psychological situation of the patient can be fundamental. Furthermore, COVID-19 has a serious impact on mental health and, since the beginning of the pandemic, a significantly higher incidence of anxiety disorders and depressive symptoms especially in younger people was observed. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of depressive disorders, anxiety, and fibromyalgia (FM) in our patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis during the lockdown period due to the COVID-19 pandemic and we validate the use of telemedicine in the clinical management of these patients. Mental and physical stress during the COVID-19 pandemic can greatly worsen FM symptoms and intensify patients' suffering without a clinical flare of the inflammatory disease for patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Telemedicine has allowed us to identify patients who needed a face-to-face approach for therapeutic reevaluation even if not related to a flare of the inflammatory disease. Even if our data does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine as greater than or equal to the standard face-to-face approach, we continue to work by modifying our approach to try to ensure the necessary care in compliance with safety and, optimistically, this tool will become an important part of rheumatic disease management.

Disease burden, symptoms, and use of analgesics in patients with psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriasis have an impaired quality of life and higher use of analgesics than the general population. Whether such use is due to skin pain or a consequence of joint pain resulting from psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is not clear. OBJECTIVES: To assess symptoms, disease burden, and use of analgesics in patients with psoriasis with and without PsA. METHOD: Symptoms, general health (EurQol 5-dimension and 5-levels), and use of analgesics were assessed in patients with psoriasis and the general population from the Danish Skin Cohort. RESULTS: We included 4016 patients with psoriasis (847 with concomitant PsA) and 3490 reference individuals. For patients with psoriasis having PsA, itch, skin pain, and/or joint pain was associated with worse general health. Use of opioids within 12 months was observed among 9.0% of the general population, 14.2% of patients with psoriasis without PsA, and 22.7% of patients with concomitant PsA. Of the symptoms, only joint pain was associated with use of analgesics (odds ratio, 3.72 (2.69-5.14); P < .0001). LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design. CONCLUSION: Patients with psoriasis (especially concomitant PsA) have a higher use of analgesics compared with the general population, which appears to be a result of increased joint pain.

Role of ultrasound for assessment of psoriatic arthritis patients with fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether ultrasonography (US), as an objective imaging modality, can optimise the evaluation of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with concomitant fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: The study population included 156 consecutive PsA patients who were recruited prospectively and fulfilled the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis criteria. The patients underwent complete clinical evaluation including assessment of fulfilment of the 2016 fibromyalgia classification criteria. All of the patients underwent US evaluation including 52 joints, 40 tendons and 14 entheses. The US score was based on the summation of a semiquantitative score (including synovitis, tenosynovitis and enthesitis). Scoring was performed by a sonographer blinded to the clinical data. Spearman's correlation coefficient and multivariate linear regression models were used to examine the association of FMS with clinical and the US scores. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (26.9%) with coexisting PsA and FMS were compared with 114 (73.1%) PsA patients without FMS. Patients with PsA and FMS had significantly increased scores for clinical composite indices, including non-Minimal Disease Activity, Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) (p<0.001). In contrast, the total US score and its subcategories were similar for those with and without FMS. The total US score significantly correlated with CPDAI, DAPSA and PASDAS (p<0.001) in the PsA without FMS but not in the PsA with FMS group. FMS was significantly associated with higher clinical scores (p<0.001) but not with the US score (multivariable linear regression models). CONCLUSIONS: US has significantly greater value than composite clinical scores in the assessment of disease activity in PsA patients with FMS.

Assessment of Widespread and Extraarticular Pain in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Case-control Study.

OBJECTIVE: A remarkable lack of detailed knowledge on pain areas in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is present, and their clinical relevance is quite unknown. The main aim of the study was to explore pain areas in PsA, comparing them with those involved in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In addition, a secondary aim was to investigate any possible association between pain areas and outcome measures in PsA. METHODS: This was a case-control study on patients with PsA satisfying Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria and patients with FM. In all patients with PsA and FM, a body chart filled in by the patient reporting pain areas in 80 body locations was performed. The Widespread Pain Index (WPI) was performed in all patients with PsA and FM. In all patients with PsA, an assessment of disease activity, treatment target, function, and impact of disease was carried out. RESULTS: Fifty patients with PsA and 50 FM controls were evaluated. A significantly higher number of pain areas in the body chart and higher WPI scores were found in patients with FM when compared to patients with PsA. In PsA, the number of areas reported in the body chart significantly correlated with the Disease Activity Index for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and PsA Impact of Disease. Patients who showed a significantly high number of extraarticular pain areas involved were those who were not in remission/minimal disease activity, or who did not have a greater impact of disease or reduced function. CONCLUSION: The main results showed that widespread and extraarticular pain was present in patients with PsA, showing that this nonarticular pain had an impact on important disease domains. The present study could contribute to an important aspect of this challenging and multifaceted disease-namely, the assessment of widespread pain.

Assessment of loneliness in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

AIM: This study aimed to explore loneliness and associated factors in Turkish patients with inflammatory arthritis. METHOD: Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 58), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (n = 53), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (n = 30), respectively, were included in the study. A single-item visual analog scale (VAS) for loneliness, UCLA Loneliness Scale-8 (ULS-8), Beck depression inventory (BDI), Beck anxiety inventory (BAI), revised multidimensional scale of perceived social support, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were used for the psychometric and functional assessments. Multiple regression models were generated for predicting the ULS-8 and HAQ-DI scores. RESULTS: There was no difference between disease groups in terms of the ULS-8 and HAQ-DI scores. Among demographic and clinical parameters, only the education status and number of drugs used had associations with the ULS-8 score. Single-item VAS score for loneliness did not predict the ULS-8 score well. There were significant correlations between the ULS-8 and HAQ-DI, depression, anxiety, social support, and physician global VAS scores. Only the education status significantly predicted (ß = -0.208) the ULS-8 score in multiple regression analysis (adjusted R2  = 0.15, P < .001). Beck depression, anxiety, and patient global VAS scores remained significant for predicting the HAQ-DI after multiple regression with the covariates ULS-8, depression, anxiety, social support, patient and physician global VAS scores, and the number of drugs used (adjusted R2  = 0.53, P < .001). Disease activity and the ULS-8 scores were not found to be associated in any disease group. CONCLUSION: Loneliness is associated with depression, anxiety, lack of social support, disability, higher number of drugs used, and lower education but not with disease activity in Turkish patients with RA, AS, and PsA. Perception and expression of loneliness vary according to the cultural background. Single-item scales for loneliness may lack reliability compared to the more comprehensive ULS-8.

Development of a national survey on foot involvement among people with psoriatic arthritis in Australia using a best practice approach: a survey development protocol.

BACKGROUND: Limited research to date has defined the nature and extent of foot involvement in a psoriatic arthritis-specific population in Australia and the scale of the problem remains unclear. Survey research provides the ideal opportunity to sample a large population over a wide geographical area. Although quality criteria for survey research have been developed, research shows that adherence is low and that survey studies are poorly reported in peer-reviewed survey articles, which limits the ability to inform future survey design. The objective of this paper was to develop a national survey about foot involvement in people with psoriatic arthritis using a best practice approach. This is a methods paper for the development of survey research. METHODS: A systematic, multi-stage process of survey development was undertaken, which comprised 3 phases: 1) the generation of the conceptual framework and survey content; 2) the development of the survey and pre-testing and 3) development of the survey dissemination strategy. A survey best practice approach was adopted using iterative pre-testing techniques, which included; cognitive debriefing, cultural sensitivity review, survey design expert validation, subject expert validation and pilot testing. Targeted postal and online survey dissemination strategies were developed a priori to optimise the response rates anticipated. RESULTS: A 59-item survey with 8 sections was developed. Findings demonstrated a high survey response (n = 649), high data completeness (83% of respondents reached the end of the survey) and low rates of missing data (below 5% for 95% of respondents). Extensive survey pre-testing among the target population, health professionals and experts improved the overall quality, content validity, functioning and representativeness of the survey instrument, which optimised potential response rates. Clear audit trails that mapped the analytical process at each stage substantiated the rigour of the survey development methods. Robust strategies for sampling, survey dissemination and community engagement were deemed to have made a powerful contribution to response rates and the scale of information collected. CONCLUSIONS: Robust patient-centred methods in survey design were used to create a novel, high-quality survey to comprehensively evaluate psoriatic arthritis-related foot involvement. Transparent and precise description of the survey design and dissemination methods provides useful information to other researchers embarking on survey design in healthcare.

French survey on the crossed needs on sexual health for chronic inflammatory rheumatism patients and healthcare professionals.

Patients with Inflammatory Chronic Rheumatic disease have approximately three times more sexual dysfunction than the healthy population. However, health professionals do not dare to discuss the subject with them, largely because they do not feel educated on the subject. To define the educational needs in the sexual health of health professionals involved in patient education and those of patients with Inflammatory Chronic Rheumatic disease. This French multicenter cross-sectional online study included health professionals involved in patient education and patients with Inflammatory Chronic Rheumatic disease. Two surveys were designed to assess, both of them the specific needs. They were filled out anonymously online with a secured server. The influence of professionals and patients' characteristics on their sexual health needs were tested. 57 health professionals and 239 patients answered. 71,6% of the patients reported sexual difficulties and 79,9% had never discussed them with health professionals. To facilitate discussion, the health professionals most often wanted a colleague specialized in sexual health in their team (59,7%) and access to tools (52,6%). The patients' primary expectations were psychological support (65.7%), information (51.9%), and referral to specialists if needed (43.1%). The topics the health professionals and patients considered most useful were adverse effects of treatment and impact of rheumatism on sexuality and body image. 70,2% of the health professionals felt they needed training. This survey demonstrates the need to offer educational training to health professionals designed to enable them to address and discuss sexual health issues and give their patients appropriate advice.

Enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis (Part 3): clinical assessment and management.

Enthesitis is a common clinical feature of PsA, which is characterized by inflammation at the site of insertion of tendons, ligaments and joint capsule fibres into bone. Enthesitis is relatively unique to the spondyloarthritides, setting this group of diseases apart from other rheumatological conditions. The pathophysiological underpinnings of this clinical domain, and the imaging assessment of it, are described in accompanying articles in this supplement. The focus of this article is on the assessment of enthesitis by physical examination, the impact of enthesitis on function and quality of life, the impact of concomitant FM on clinical assessment, and the evidence for therapy of enthesitis garnered in trials of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Several physical examination measures of enthesitis have been developed and have proved reliable in assessment of enthesitis. Enthesitis has a significant deleterious impact on function and quality of life. The presence of concomitant FM in ≤20% of patients may result in artefactual worsening of assessment of disease severity and hinder achievement of the goal of low disease activity or remission. Several targeted therapies, which, for example, target the TNF, IL-17, IL-23, phosphodiesterase 4 or Janus kinase pathways, have shown significant efficacy in the treatment of enthesitis, resulting in improvement of function and quality of life for patients with PsA.

Investigator and Patient Global Assessment Measures for Psoriasis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review on Measurement Properties from the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) has defined a core set of domains to be measured in all psoriasis clinical trials. This set comprises the following domains: skin manifestations, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis symptoms, health-related quality of life, investigator global, patient global, and treatment satisfaction. The next step is to define how to measure these domains. The objective of this article was to evaluate the quality of available instruments to assess 'investigator global' and 'patient global' domains to identify the most appropriate instruments. METHODS: Reviewers conducted a systematic literature review to retrieve studies on the measurement properties of instruments including either an investigator global assessment or a patient global assessment. Following the COnsensus based standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, three independent reviewers rated the quality of each study. We then performed a qualitative synthesis of the evidence. RESULTS: We identified nine investigator global assessments and three patient global assessments, reflecting substantial variability in global assessment instruments. Overall, most measures lacked evidence for content validity and feasibility. The Lattice System-Physician Global Assessment, Product of the Investigator Global Assessment and Body Surface Area, and the professional-Simplified Psoriasis Index had higher levels of evidence for validity, reliability, and/or responsiveness than the 5- and 6-point investigator global assessments. The self-assessment-Simplified Psoriasis Index was the only patient global assessment with evidence for validity, reliability, and responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The 5- and 6-point investigator global assessments, which are the most widely used investigator global assessments in registered clinical trials, have less evidence for measurement properties as compared with the Lattice System-Physician Global Assessment, professional-Simplified Psoriasis Index, and the Product of the Investigator Global Assessment and Body Surface Area. However, all instruments lack evidence for content validity and feasibility. Further validation studies of investigator global assessments and patient global assessments are required to recommend the best global measure for psoriasis clinical trials.

Health professional views on the assessment and management of foot problems in people with psoriatic arthritis in Australia and New Zealand: a qualitative investigation.

BACKGROUND: Active foot disease persists in a high proportion of people with psoriatic arthritis despite the availability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to modify the course of the disease. Limited information exists on the provision of health care for foot disease in psoriatic arthritis. The objective of this study was to explore the views of health professionals on the assessment and management of people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot involvement. METHODS: Convenience sampling was used to recruit health professionals working in rheumatology outpatient clinics in Sydney, Australia and Auckland, New Zealand. Three focus groups were undertaken to explore the views and experiences of health professionals on the assessment and management of foot problems in people with psoriatic arthritis. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data was analysed using a constant comparative analytic approach to identify themes. RESULTS: A total of seventeen health professionals participated including rheumatologists, podiatrists and a physiotherapist. Key themes derived from the focus groups suggest that health professionals perceived that people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot problems experience suboptimal management from symptom onset, to diagnosis and treatment. Frustration was expressed throughout discussions relating to lack of appropriate training and expertise required for the specialised management of foot problems typically encountered with psoriatic arthritis and poor access for patients to specialist podiatry services. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insight into the perspectives of health professionals on the management of foot problems related to psoriatic arthritis. Deficiencies in the diagnosis, assessment and treatment of foot problems were revealed. To meet the foot health needs of people with psoriatic arthritis, reducing diagnostic delay, improving knowledge and awareness about the disease among people with psoriatic arthritis and health professionals, and increasing specialist podiatry service provision may be required.

Ultrasonographic and Clinical Assessment of Peripheral Enthesitis in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriasis, and Fibromyalgia Syndrome: The ULISSE Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the ULISSE study was to evaluate the prevalence of clinical and ultrasonographic (US) entheseal involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis, and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: In this cross-sectional multicenter study, patients with PsA and psoriasis (not taking systemic therapy) and FMS underwent a clinical evaluation of the entheses, and a B-mode and power Doppler examination of 6 pairs of entheses. RESULTS: The study analyzed 140 patients with PsA, 51 with psoriasis, and 51 with FMS. Clinical and US examinations were performed in 1960 and 1680 entheses in the PsA group, and 714 and 612 entheses both in the psoriasis group and in the FMS group. In both per-patient and per-enthesis evaluation, the frequency of entheseal tenderness was higher in patients with FMS (92% of the patients and 46% of the entheses, compared with 66%/23% in the PsA group and 59%/18% in the psoriasis group). With US examination, signs of entheseal involvement were more frequent in both the per-patient and per-enthesis evaluation in PsA and psoriasis (about 90% of patients in both the PsA and psoriasis groups and 75% of patients in the FMS group had at least 1 site affected, and 54%, 41%, and 27% of the pairs of entheses in, respectively, PsA, psoriasis, and FMS patients showed at least 1 enthesis involved). CONCLUSION: The ULISSE study indicated that enthesitis is a common feature in patients with PsA, those with psoriasis, and in those with FMS if only clinical examination is used. US entheseal assessment showed findings more consistent with the 3 disorders.

Perspectives of patients and health professionals on the experience of living with psoriatic arthritis-related foot problems: a qualitative investigation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore how foot problems impact on the lives of people with psoriatic arthritis by interviewing patients and health professionals. METHOD: Participants were recruited from outpatient rheumatology clinics in Sydney, Australia, and in Auckland, New Zealand, using a convenience sampling strategy. People with psoriatic arthritis were asked questions in semi-structured interviews about their foot problems and the impact they have on daily living until qualitative data saturation. Focus groups were undertaken with health professionals to explore their understanding of the patient experience of psoriatic arthritis-related foot problems. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify emerging themes from the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot problems and 17 health professionals participated. Three overarching key themes were derived from patients and health professionals: (1) structural and functional foot manifestations, (2) impact on daily life leading to social withdrawal and reduced work productivity and (3) mediating factors influencing the severity of impact from foot problems on their lives such as social support, self-management strategies and experiences of health care. CONCLUSION: Foot problems caused functional disability and altered self-concept, which lead to a cascade of social, economic and psychological consequences. People with foot problems contend with profound disruption to their functioning and life roles. Whilst health professionals recognised the functional and visual impact that foot problems have on daily life, the emotional burden may be under-appreciated. Future work to determine the scale and types of foot problems in psoriatic arthritis is required.

Pathophysiology, assessment and treatment of psoriatic dactylitis.

Dactylitis is diffuse swelling of the digits that is usually related to an underlying inflammatory or infiltrative disorder. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common severe disease thought to cause dactylitis. Our understanding of the pathogenesis of PsA-related dactylitis comes from experimental animal models of PsA-like disease, as well as advances in imaging and other clinical studies. Clinical trials in PsA have increasingly included dactylitis as an important secondary outcome measure. These studies indicate that cytokines drive multi-locus microanatomical pan-digital pathology. Given the importance of pro-inflammatory cytokines, the pathogenesis of dactylitis is best understood as an initial aberrant innate immune response to biomechanical stress or injury, with subsequent adaptive immune mechanisms amplifying the dactylitis inflammatory response. Regarding the treatment of dactylitis, no studies have been conducted using dactylitis as the primary outcome measure, and the current knowledge comes from analysis of dactylitis as a secondary outcome measure.

Ultrasound Assessment of Changes in Nails in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to conduct an ultrasound (US) assessment of changes in fingernails in psoriatic patients with nail involvement. MATERIAL: A total of 69 patients with psoriatic changes in nails participated in the study, including 38 patients with psoriasis (Ps) and 31 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and 30 people in the control group. A total of 988 nails were examined. RESULTS: The thickness of the nail plate, nail bed, and matrix as shown in an ultrasound examination increased with the mNAPSI index (r=0.328, p=0.021; r=0.219, p=0.036; and r=0.422, p=0.011, respectively). The thickness of nail plate, bed, and matrix in patients with onycholysis and hyperkeratosis-type changes (concomitant or present separately) was significantly greater than when only pitting-type changes occurred (p=0.007, p=0.035, and p=0.023, respectively). An examination of nails with only pitting-type changes showed an increase in the matrix thickness compared to the control group (p=0.018). The focal hyperechoic involvement of the dorsal plate (80%) was the change most often observed in an US examination in Ps patients, whereas loosening of the borders of the ventral plate was most often observed in PsA patients. The thickness of nail bed in PsA patients increased with the duration of arthritis (r=0.399, p=0.022) and was correlated with the number of swollen digits (r=0.278, p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study may indicate an association of an inflammation in the nail bed with PsA development. Apart from a direct assessment of the described morphological changes of nails, a US examination could prove useful in an assessment of intensity of a local inflammation as a prognostic factor for PsA development.

Assessment of two screening tools to identify psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with psoriasis have undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis. Low specificity is found with many PsA screening tools. A new instrument, the CONTEST questionnaire, was developed utilizing the most discriminative items from existing instruments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the CONTEST and PEST screening tools. METHODS: People attending secondary care clinics with psoriasis, but not PsA, completed the questionnaires, were assessed for function and quality of life, and had a physical examination. Patients thought to have PsA were compared to those without. The performance of CONTEST and PEST was compared using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity at the previously published cut-offs. RESULTS: A total of 451 dermatology patients were approached, 35% were reviewed and 27 (17%, 95% CI 12.3-21.7) had unidentified psoriatic arthritis. The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of PEST were 0.60 (0.42-0.78)/0.76 (0.69-0.83) and for CONTEST 0.53 (0.34-0.72)/0.71 (0.63-0.79). The confidence limits for the AUC overlapped (AUC for PEST 0.72 (0.61-0.84), for CONTEST 0.66 (0.54-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: PEST and CONTEST questionnaires performed equally well, with no superiority of the new CONTEST tool.