Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 8(9): 1013-1030, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Extraintestinal manifestations are common in inflammatory bowel disease patients, although there are few data available on their diagnosis, management and follow-up. We systematically reviewed the literature evidence to evaluate tools and investigations used for the diagnosis and for the assessment of the treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations. METHODS: We searched in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from January 1999-December 2019 for all interventional and non-interventional studies published in English assessing diagnostic tools and investigations used in inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations. RESULTS: Forty-five studies (16 interventional and 29 non-interventional) were included in our systematic review, enrolling 7994 inflammatory bowel disease patients. The diagnostic assessment of extraintestinal manifestations was performed by dedicated specialists in a percentage of cases ranging from 60-100% depending on the specific condition. The clinical examination was the most frequent diagnostic strategy, accounting for 35 studies (77.8%). In patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or rheumatological symptoms, biochemical and imaging tests were also performed. Anti-TNF agents were the most used biological drugs for the treatment of extraintestinal manifestations (20 studies, 44.4%), and the treatment response varied from 59.1% in axial spondyloarthritis to 88.9% in ocular manifestations. No benefit was detected in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients after treatment with biologics. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinical management of inflammatory bowel disease patients with extraintestinal manifestations the collaboration of dedicated specialists for diagnostic investigations and follow-up is key to ensure the best of care approach. However, international guidelines are needed to homogenise and standardise the assessment of extraintestinal manifestations.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Colaboração Intersetorial , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Colangite Esclerosante/diagnóstico , Colangite Esclerosante/imunologia , Colangite Esclerosante/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Colite Ulcerativa/imunologia , Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Doença de Crohn/imunologia , Doença de Crohn/terapia , Oftalmopatias/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatias/imunologia , Oftalmopatias/terapia , Humanos , Inflamação/imunologia , Inflamação/terapia , Artropatias/diagnóstico , Artropatias/imunologia , Artropatias/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias/imunologia , Dermatopatias/terapia
2.
J Cyst Fibros ; 15(4): e35-40, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809203

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Cystic fibrosis arthropathy (CFA) is a term commonly used for joint pain with and without swelling seen in some patients with CF. Early studies into CFA focused on the presence of rheumatoid factor and immunological changes on synovial biopsy, with parallels drawn between respiratory and joint activity. Identification of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) as a marker of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), along with increased access to sensitive imaging techniques including ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), offer great potential to investigate and more accurately understand the type(s) of inflammatory arthritis that may underlie CFA. The aim of this study was to phenotype an active CFA cohort using serology and imaging, as a basis for further work in this understudied area. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study of symptomatic CFA patients presenting with joint pain. Participants underwent serological testing, clinical and US joint and entheseal assessment, as well as MRI of the most symptomatic joint/joint area. RESULTS: Ten symptomatic patients were studied with 9/10 having positive clinical findings. Inflammatory changes on US were seen in 8/10 cases. Five patients had positive findings on MRI (3 of whom had received IV gadolinium contrast). This included patients with significant erosive changes. One patient was anti-CCP positive suggestive of RA, and two were anti-nuclear antibody positive. CONCLUSION: Imaging, and to a lesser extent serology, identified inflammatory joint pathology in a proportion of cases, providing important data to explore in a large CFA cohort examining the clinical and imaging phenotype of this group.


Assuntos
Autoanticorpos , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Artropatias , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Autoanticorpos/análise , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Fibrose Cística/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/imunologia , Artropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Artropatias/etiologia , Artropatias/imunologia , Masculino , Gravidade do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Estatística como Assunto , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA