Predicting outcomes of total joint arthroplasty using the distress and risk assessment method.

BACKGROUND: Psychological distress is presumed to be an important factor that can adversely impact the outcome of orthopaedic procedures. The Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) is an evaluation tool which assesses psychological distress in patients with low back pain. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the influence of preoperative psychological distress, as determined by the DRAM score, on the functional outcomes of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 61 TJAs was performed at a single institution. The DRAM questionnaire and a variety of functional measures (12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], visual analogue scale [VAS], Oxford Hip Score [OHS], Oxford Knee Score [OKS], and Oswestry Disability Questionnaire [ODQ]) were administered to the patient at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Mixed model regressions and Mann-Whitney tests were utilised to evaluate the relationship of the DRAM score with functional outcomes. RESULTS: The summed quantitative DRAM score was predictive of functional outcomes. With each 1 point increase in psychological distress, VAS pain increased by 0.023 (p = 0.015), OKS decreased by 0.34 (p = 0.01), ODQ increased by 0.065 (p = 0.02), and MCS decreased by 0.14 (p = 0.015). In addition, patients with lower preoperative distress scores had higher rates of improvement than patients with higher preoperative distress scores for VAS pain (p = 0.034). DISCUSSION: Psychological distress was associated with decreased baseline mental health and function in the early postoperative period, which has important implications for bundled payments. However, patients with psychological distress still demonstrated functional improvements and TJA should thus not be contraindicated in these patients.

Effectiveness of a complex intervention to improve participation and activities in nursing home residents with joint contractures (JointConEval): study protocol of a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial [DRKS-ID:DRKS00015185].

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents are frequently affected by joint contractures, which impacts their participation and daily activities. A complex intervention, the Participation Enabling Care in Nursing (PECAN), was previously developed and pilot tested to address their needs. Its effectiveness and safety will be evaluated in the present study. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 32 nursing homes spread over two regions of Germany. A total of 578 residents over 65 years old with joint contractures will be included. To compare the effect of the PECAN intervention with optimised standard care (usual care and an information session), randomisation will take place at a cluster level. The individually tailored intervention was designed using the biopsychosocial model in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to reduce activity limitations and participation restrictions resulting from existing joint contractures by addressing barriers and by strengthening supportive factors on an individual level and an organisational level. The implementation strategy comprises a facilitators' workshop, a peer mentoring approach including a peer mentor visit and telephone peer counselling, an in-house information event, an information session for the nursing team and a training session on collegial consultation for the facilitators. The in-house information event will also take place in the nursing homes of the control group. The primary outcome is the residents' participation and activities after 12 months of follow-up as assessed using the PaArticular Scales. The secondary outcome is the residents' quality of life. A cost-effectiveness analysis (costs per additional resident who experienced a decrease of ten points in the participation or activities subscale of the PaArticular Scales) and a cost-utility analysis (costs per additional quality adjusted life year) will be conducted. We will investigate barriers and facilitators in a comprehensive process evaluation. DISCUSSION: We expect a clinically relevant improvement of participation and activities in residents with joint contractures. Our findings will provide important insights regarding participation in the situation of the affected individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS, DRKS00015185 . Registered on 1 August 2018. Universal Trial Number U1111-1218-1555. Registered on 26 July 2018.

Health Care Needs and Support for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Prosthetic Joint Infection following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee arthroplasty are common interventions for the treatment of joint conditions, most notably osteoarthritis. Although many patients benefit from surgery, approximately 1% of patients develop infection afterwards known as deep prosthetic joint infection (PJI), which often requires further major surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess support needs of patients undergoing treatment for PJI following hip or knee arthroplasty and to identify and evaluate what interventions are routinely offered to support such patients. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cinahl, Social Science Citation Index, The Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies from January 01, 1980 to October 05, 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: Observational (prospective or retrospective cohort, nested case-control or case-control) studies, qualitative studies, or clinical trials conducted in patients treated for PJI and/or other major adverse occurrences following hip or knee arthroplasty. REVIEW METHODS: Data were extracted by two independent investigators and consensus was reached with involvement of a third. Given the heterogeneous nature of study designs, methods, and limited number of studies, a narrative synthesis is presented. RESULTS: Of 4,213 potentially relevant citations, we identified one case-control, one prospective cohort and two qualitative studies for inclusion in the synthesis. Patients report that PJI and treatment had a profoundly negative impact affecting physical, emotional, social and economic aspects of their lives. No study evaluated support interventions. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that patients undergoing treatment for PJI have extensive physical, psychological, social and economic support needs. The interpretation of study results is limited by variation in study design, outcome measures and the small number of relevant eligible studies. However, our review highlights a lack of evidence about support strategies for patients undergoing treatment for PJI and other adverse occurrences following hip or knee arthroplasty. There is a need to design, implement and evaluate interventions to support these patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015027175.

[Validation of the computerized adaptive assessment procedure RehaCAT related to functional and mental strain in a sample of rehabilitation patient suffering from musculoskeletal diseases]. / Validierung der computeradaptiven Assessmentprozedur RehaCAT hinsichtlich funktionaler und psychischer Belastungen bei Rehabilitanden mit muskuloskelettalen Erkrankungen.

The Rasch-based, computerized adaptive assessment procedure RehaCAT allows to assess the ICF-oriented dimensions "activities in daily living", "functionality upper extremities" and "functionality lower extremities" as well as "depression" economically and reliably in orthopaedic rehabilitation patients. This validation study aimed at analyzing the multivariate association of the RehaCAT dimensions with the commonly applied ODI, SF-12 and HADS-D assessment scales in a sample of rehabilitation patient suffering from musculoskeletal diseases (spine disease: 58,7%). By means of structural equation modeling high convergent and divergent validity of the RehaCAT dimensions could be proven in a sample of N=184 rehabilitation patients (71,2% inpatient and 28,8% outpatient). In the resulting model between 41% (functionality upper extremities) and 76% (activities in daily living) of the RehaCAT dimensions could be explained mainly by the theoretical assumed predictor constructs. Because of its psychometric foundation, economy and validity, the RehaCAT provides an optimal basis to assess central ICF-oriented constructs in orthopaedic rehabilitation.

The relationship between depressive symptoms and shoulder mobility among older women: assessment at one year after breast cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between depressive symptoms and shoulder range of motion at one year after breast cancer diagnosis, controlling for patient characteristics, tumour stage and cancer therapy (surgery, axillary node dissection and radiation). DESIGN: Prospective trial of nurse case management involving 187 older women with complete data, age 60 years and older, newly diagnosed with breast cancer, from 1 November, 1993 to 31 October, 1996 in south-eastern Texas. Depressive symptoms, sociodemographic characteristics and breast cancer treatment were measured at two months and shoulder range of motion at 12 months. The relationship among the variables was evaluated with bivariate chi-square statistics and logistic regression analysis. All logistic models also included a variable indicating whether or not the woman received nurse case management, to control for intervention status. RESULTS: Increasing depressive symptoms at baseline were associated with lower arm mobility at 12 months following breast cancer diagnosis. Each unit increase in depressive symptoms at baseline was associated with an 8% decreased odds of having full range of motion of the shoulder (odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87, 0.97), after controlling for relevant patient and treatment factors. CONCLUSION(S): Older women with depressive symptoms have an elevated risk of not fully recovering shoulder mobility after being treated for breast cancer. Future studies are needed to assess benefits from early intervention with psychological and or physical interventions in the presence of depressive symptoms on shoulder mobility.

Health-related and overall quality of life of patients with chronic hip and knee complaints in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Information about quality of life of patients with chronic hip or knee complaints in general practice is scarce. This study describes the health-related and overall quality of life (HRQL) of these complaints. METHODS: Data were obtained from a cohort study in general practice. HRQL at three months follow-up was analysed. HRQL was measured as: symptoms, physical, psychological and social functioning, and general health perceptions, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and the MOS 36-item short-form-health survey (SF-36). Overall quality of life was measured using a 5-point rating scale. RESULTS: The results show that patients with chronic hip or knee complaints have a substantial lower HRQL compared to patients who had recovered from baseline hip or knee complaints. The largest effect was found on symptoms and physical functioning: up to 2.9 standard deviations below patients who had recovered from baseline hip or knee complaints. Scores of patients with both chronic hip and knee complaints were significantly worse than scores of patients with only knee complaints on most subscales. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic hip or knee complaints the worst scores were seen on scales that measure symptoms and physical functioning, but still a substantially lower score was obtained for overall quality of life. Quality of life was poorer for patients with both chronic hip and knee complaints compared to those with chronic hip or knee complaints only.

Effects of haemophilic arthropathy on health-related quality of life and socio-economic parameters.

Although prophylactic treatment is advised for all children with severe haemophilia, the optimal regimen is still under discussion. Should all joint bleeds be prevented, or can a limited amount of arthropathy be tolerated in adulthood without loss of quality of life? To answer this question, the effect of haemophilic arthropathy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) needs to be quantified. In a retrospective study, the effect of arthropathy on HRQoL and socio-economic parameters was assessed in a single-centre cohort of 96 patients with severe and moderate haemophilia with a minimum age of 13 years. Arthropathy was measured by the radiological Pettersson score of the elbows, knees and ankles (maximum: 78 points). HRQoL was assessed by the Short Form 36 (SF36), measuring eight domains of health. Labourforce participation and medical consumption were assessed using a separate questionnaire. Patients were studied at a mean age of 28.6 years (range: 13-54), the mean time between evaluation and the last Pettersson score was 0.4 years (SD: 1.1). The overall median Pettersson score was 13 (range: 0-78). There was a trend towards lower quality of life with increasing Pettersson scores and age, especially in the physical domains of the SF36. An age-adjusted analysis showed that arthropathy had a small but significant effect on HRQoL in the domain of 'physical function' of the SF36, but not on its other domains, or on labourforce participation and medical consumption. Thus suggesting that the SF36 can be used to assess the effects of haemophilic arthropathy, especially in the domain of 'physical function'.

The assessment of knowledge in ankylosing spondylitis patients by a self-administered questionnaire.

The aim of the present study was to assess ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients' level of knowledge, using a self-administered multiple-choice questionnaire. The questionnaire, based on the Arthritis and Rheumatism Council (ARC) leaflet on AS, examined four areas: (A) general knowledge; (B) immunogenetic tests and inheritance; (C) general management; (D) joint protection, pacing and priorities. Statistical analysis was used to validate the questionnaire and to examine correlations with gender, age, disease duration and level of general education. The questionnaire was consistent, reliable and easy to read. The results showed AS patients to have a high level of knowledge (mean = 19.4, maximum possible = 25), although some wrong beliefs about the role of blood tests, the HLA-B27 antigen and inheritance were discovered. No statistical correlation was found between gender, age, duration of the disease, level of general education and the level of knowledge. These data suggest that this questionnaire is a simple way to detect the level of knowledge of patients with AS. The average score achieved by AS patients was outstanding, possibly reflecting the good quality of previous educational programmes. Patients' confusion regarding blood tests, genetics and inheritance was highlighted and should be addressed.

Psychological assessment in general orthopaedic practice.

The importance of psychologic distress and illness behavior is well recognized in low-back pain but has rarely been studied in other orthopedic conditions. Psychologic and clinical assessment of 100 patients undergoing elective surgery for minor leg conditions or joint replacement for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis showed surprisingly little psychologic distress or illness behavior, particularly when compared with 235 patients with low-back pain. The most striking finding was that in low-back pain there was a close relation between psychologic disturbance and failed surgery, but the nonspinal patients showed a complete absence of such a relation. This type of psychologic assessment is neither necessary nor helpful in the routine management of most clearly defined, nonspinal, correctly managed orthopedic conditions.