Assessment of upper airway changes after interpositional arthroplasty: a cephalometric analysis.

This prospective cohort study examined the changes in airway area and soft tissue parameters following interpositional arthroplasty for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis. Ten patients with TMJ ankylosis underwent surgery, and preoperative and postoperative skeletal and soft tissue measurements were obtained. A significant rise in soft tissue parameters was observed following surgery, although only minor changes in skeletal parameters were seen. The nasoropharyngeal area, oral area, soft palate area, and tongue area were examined. After the surgery, increases in values were observed in the nasoropharyngeal area (from 3482.4 mm2 to 3618.7 mm2), the oral area (from 2731.8 mm2 to 2840.8 mm2), the soft palate area (from 204.9 mm2 to 217.3 mm2), and the tongue area (from 2577.5 mm2 to 2600.8 mm2). These findings suggest that interpositional arthroplasty can improve airway area and soft tissue dimensions, affecting the stomatognathic system's aesthetic and functional aspects. Further research is needed to validate these results and assess long-term stability.

Health Care Costs Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the postoperative costs associated with both anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in the two-year period following surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CDA has become an increasingly common alternative to ACDF for the treatment of cervical disc disorders. Although a number of studies have compared clinical outcomes between both procedures, much less is known about the postoperative economic burden of each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By analyzing a commercial insurance claims database (Marketscan, Merative), patients who underwent one-level or two-level ACDF and CDA procedures between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 were identified and included in the study. The primary outcome was the cost of payments for postoperative management in the two-year period following ACDF or CDA. Identified postoperative interventions included in the study were: (i) physical therapy, (ii) pain medication, (iii) injections, (iv) psychological treatment, and (iv) subsequent spine surgeries. RESULTS: Totally, 2304 patients (age: 49.0±9.4 yr; male, 50.1%) were included in the study. In all, 1723 (74.8%) patients underwent ACDF, while 581 (25.2%) underwent CDA. The cost of surgery was similar between both groups (ACDF: $26,819±23,449; CDA: $25,954±20,620; P =0.429). Thirty-day, 90-day, and two-year global costs were all lower for patients who underwent CDA compared with ACDF ($31,024 vs. $34,411, $33,064 vs. $37,517, and $55,723 vs. $68,113, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lower two-year health care costs were found for patients undergoing CDA compared with ACDF. Further work is necessary to determine the drivers of these findings and the associated longer-term outcomes.

A prospective study of lumbar facet arthroplasty in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis: cost-effective assessment from the Total Posterior Spine system (TOPSTM) IDE Study: 2-year model revision and sensitivity analyses based on 305 subjects.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A previous cost-effectiveness analysis published in 2022 found that the Total Posterior Spine (TOPSTM) system was dominant over transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This analysis required updating to reflect a more complete dataset and pricing considerations. PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TOPSTM system as compared with TLIF based on an updated and complete FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) data set. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cost-utility analysis of the TOPSTM system compared to TLIF. PATIENT SAMPLE: A multicenter, FDA IDE, randomized control trial (RCT) investigated the efficacy of TOPSTM compared to TLIF with a current population of n=305 enrolled and n=168 with complete 2-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated to determine our primary outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Secondary outcome measures included: net monetary benefit as well at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. METHODS: The primary outcome of cost-effectiveness is determined by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. A Markov model was used to simulate the health outcomes and costs of patients undergoing TOPSTM or TLIF over a 2-year period. alternative scenario sensitivity analysis, one-way sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results. RESULTS: The updated base case result demonstrated that TOPSTM was immediately and longitudinally dominant compared with the control with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -9,637.37 $/QALY. The net monetary benefit was correspondingly $2,237, both from the health system's perspective and at a WTP threshold of 50,000 $/QALY at the 2-year time point. This remained true in all scenarios tested. The Alternative Scenario Sensitivity Analysis suggested cost-effectiveness irrespective of payer type and surgical setting. To remain cost-effective, the cost difference between TOPSTM and TLIF should be no greater than $1,875 and $3,750 at WTP thresholds of $50,000 and 100,000 $/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This updated analysis confirms that the TOPSTM device is a cost-effective and economically dominant surgical treatment option for patients with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis compared to TLIF in all scenarios examined.

A real-world analysis of hybrid CDA and ACDF compared to multilevel ACDF.

BACKGROUND: Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (mACDF) is the gold standard for multilevel spinal disease; although safe and effective, mACDF can limit regular spinal motion and contribute to adjacent segment disease (ASD). Hybrid surgery, composed of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty, has the potential to reduce ASD by retaining spinal mobility. This study examined the safety of hybrid surgery by utilizing administrative claims data to compare real-world rates of subsequent surgery and post-procedural hospitalization within populations of patients undergoing hybrid surgery versus mACDF for multilevel spinal disease. METHODS: This observational, retrospective analysis used the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Database from July 2013 through June 2020. Propensity score matched cohorts of patients who received hybrid surgery or mACDF were established based on the presence of spinal surgery procedure codes in the claims data and followed over a variable post-period. Rates of subsequent surgery and post-procedural hospitalization (30- and 90-day) were compared between hybrid surgery and mACDF cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 430 hybrid surgery patients and 2,136 mACDF patients qualified for the study; average follow-up was approximately 2 years. Similar rates of subsequent surgery (Hybrid: 1.9 surgeries/100 patient-years; mACDF: 1.8 surgeries/100 patient-years) were observed for the two cohorts. Hospitalization rates were also similar across cohorts at 30 days post-procedure (Hybrid: 0.67% hospitalized/patient-year; mACDF: 0.87% hospitalized/patient-year). At 90 days post-procedure, hybrid surgery patients had slightly lower rates of hospitalization compared to mACDF patients (0.23% versus 0.42% hospitalized/patient-year; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this real-world, retrospective cohort study confirm prior reports indicating that hybrid surgery is a safe and effective intervention for multilevel spinal disease which demonstrates non-inferiority in relation to the current gold standard mACDF. The use of administrative claims data in this analysis provides a unique perspective allowing the inclusion of a larger, more generalizable population has historically been reported on in small cohort studies.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Usage Has Leveled Out From 2010 to 2021.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study. OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in utilization and predictive factors for single-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) relative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) over the years. BACKGROUND: CDA is an alternative to ACDF for the treatment of cervical spine pathologies. With both procedures performed for similar indications, controversy on best practices exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent single-level CDA or ACDF were identified in the 2010 through 2021 PearlDiver M151Ortho data set. The yearly number of CDAs performed and proportionality was assessed. Predictive patient factors for undergoing CDA as opposed to ACDF were determined. Kaplan Meyer survival analysis with an endpoint of cervical spine reoperation compared 5-year outcomes between CDA and ACDF. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2021, 19,301 single-level CDAs and 181,476 single-level ACDFs were identified. The proportional utilization of CDA relative to ACDF increased from 4.00% in 2010 to 14.15% in 2018 ( P < 0.0001), after which there was a plateau between 2018 and 2021 where proportional utilization was 14.47% ( P = 0.4654). Multivariate analysis identified several predictors of undergoing CDA rather than ACDF, including: younger age [odds ratio (OR) per decade decrease: 1.72], having surgery performed in the Midwest, Northeast, or West (relative to South, OR: 1.16, 1.13, 2.26, respectively), having Commercial insurance (relative to Medicare, OR: 1.75), and having surgery performed by an orthopedic surgeon (relative to a neurological surgeon, OR: 1.54) ( P < 0.0001 for each). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival to further cervical spine surgery between CDA and ACDF at 5 years (97.6% vs. 97.7%, P = 0.4249). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of CDA relative to ACDF rose from 2010 to 2018, its use has subsequently plateaued between 2018 and 2021 and remained a relatively low percentage of the single-level anterior cervical surgeries performed (14.47% in 2021). The causes for such changes in the trend are unclear.

Identifying modifiable and nonmodifiable cost drivers of ambulatory rotator cuff repair: a machine learning analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Implementing novel tools that identify contributors to the cost of orthopedic procedures can help hospitals maximize efficiency, minimize waste, improve surgical decision-making, and practice value-based care. The purpose of this study was to develop and internally validate a machine learning algorithm to identify key drivers of total charges after ambulatory arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and compare its performance with a state-of-the-art statistical learning model. METHODS: A retrospective review of the New York State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database was performed to identify patients who underwent elective outpatient rotator cuff repair (RCR) from 2015 to 2016. Initial models were constructed using patient characteristics (age, gender, insurance status, patient income, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index) as well as intraoperative variables (concomitant procedures and services, operative time). These were subsequently entered into 5 separate machine learning algorithms and a generalized additive model using natural splines. Global variable importance and partial dependence curves were constructed to identify the greatest contributors to cost. RESULTS: A total of 33,976 patients undergoing ambulatory RCR were included. Median total charges after ambulatory RCR were $16,017 (interquartile range: $11,009-$22,510). The ensemble model outperformed the generalized additive model and demonstrated the best performance on internal validation (root mean squared error: $7112, 95% confidence interval: 7036-7188; logarithmic root mean squared error: 0.354, 95% confidence interval: 0.336-0.373, R2: 0.53), and identified major drivers of total charges after RCR as increasing operating room time, patient income level, number of anchors used, use of local infiltration anesthesia/peripheral nerve blocks, non-White race/ethnicity, and concurrent distal clavicle excision. The model was integrated into a web-based open-access application capable of providing individual predictions and explanations on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION: This study developed an ensemble supervised machine learning algorithm that outperformed a sophisticated statistical learning model in predicting total charges after ambulatory RCR. Important contributors to total charges included operating room time, duration of care, number of anchors used, type of anesthesia, concomitant distal clavicle excision, community characteristics, and patient demographic factors. Generation of a patient-specific payment schedule based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality risk of mortality highlighted the financial risk assumed by physicians in flat episodic reimbursement schedules given variable patient comorbidities and the importance of an accurate prediction algorithm to appropriately reward high-value care at low costs.

Structural assessment of pre-flexion in silicone implants for arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

The development of numerical models to analyze pathologies and implants related to the first metatarsophalangeal joint of the foot remains an issue for attention. The structural effects of implants pre-flexion have been discarded in several finite elements analyses due to complexities to achieve these positions. This work aims to evaluate if the pre-flexion stress state should be included or could be discarded when only flexion is applied in two different silicone commercial implants, Swanson and Tornier, during a gait cycle. Finite element models were created for silicone implants. Both models were discretized using high-order finite elements. The hyperelasticity constitutive material model of Arruda-Boyce was used, based on experimental data; its behavior was compared with linear elastic models reported and used frequently assuming small and large deformations and applying to the Swanson and Tornier implants a flexion angle of 64°, which corresponds to in vivo measurements reported after implantation. Comparison between models, regarding hyperelastic model, showed mean variations of up to 32.5% for stresses and 14.01% for bending moment in Swanson implant, while for Tornier implant mean variations of 29.73% and 632.55% was obtained for stress and bending moment respectively. The maximum stress value obtained for the hyperelastic model in the Swanson implant reached a value of 22.82% of the tensile strength of the implant material while in the Tornier implant reached a value of 25.92%, the above values were evaluated at a flexion angle of 64°. The results suggest considering in finite element analyses not only the stress state generated to achieve critical flexion position in pleflexed implants models but also the hyperelastic material behavior of silicone for implants to avoid dismissing the non-linear structural behavior of hyperelastic materials.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Thumb Carpometacarpal Resection Arthroplasty: A Health Economic Study Using Real-World Data.

PURPOSE: Knowledge about the costs and benefits of hand surgical interventions is important for surgeons, payers, and policy makers. Little is known about the cost-effectiveness of surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. The objective of this study was to examine patients' quality of life and economic costs, with focus on the cost-utility ratio 1 year after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis compared with that for continued nonsurgical management. METHODS: Patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis indicated for resection arthroplasty were included in a prospective study. The quality of life (using European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level), direct medical costs, and productivity losses were assessed up to 1 year after surgery. Baseline data at recruitment and costs sustained over 1 year before surgery served as a proxy for nonsurgical management. The total costs to gain 1 extra quality-adjusted life year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated from a health care system and a societal perspective. RESULTS: The mean European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level value for 151 included patients improved significantly from 0.69 to 0.88 (after surgery). The productivity loss during the preoperative period was 47% for 49 working patients, which decreased to 26% 1 year after surgery. The total costs increased from US $20,451 in the preoperative year to US $24,374 in the postoperative year. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US $25,370 per quality-adjusted life year for surgery compared with that for simulated nonsurgical management. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was clearly below the suggested Swiss threshold of US $92,000, indicating that thumb carpometacarpal surgery is a cost-effective intervention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analyses II.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been considered the standard treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease; however, recent trials have shown comparable outcomes with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). This study aimed to observe disparities in treatment paradigms of single-level cervical disc diseases and compare inpatient outcomes between procedures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients treated for single-level cervical disc herniation or degeneration without myelopathy was queried from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample spanning 2012-2015. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of demographics, temporality of admission, and hospital characteristics on odds of receiving CDA versus ACDF. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare cost, length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge, and inpatient complications. RESULTS: In total, 1028 CDAs and 44,374 ACDFs were performed for single-level cervical disc disease during 2012-2015. Matched comparison showed that while non-home discharges were not different between CDA and ACDF (P = 0.248), patients who received CDA had a 0.19-day shorter LOS (P < 0.001) and $4694 greater total cost (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient complication rates. Multivariate analysis showed that patients in the 26th-50th percentile, 51st-75th percentile, and 76th-100th percentile of median household income had greater odds of CDA compared with patients in the 0-25th percentile (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, P = 0.003; OR 1.31, P = 0.013; OR 1.34, P = 0.011, respectively). Patients with private insurance had greater odds of receiving CDA compared with patients on Medicare (OR 1.91, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CDA was associated with shorter LOS but greater costs compared with ACDF. Patients with greater median income and private insurance were more likely to receive CDA.

Perioperative Management of Rheumatic Disease and Therapies.

Patients with rheumatic disease, including those with systemic lupus erythematous, rheumatoid arthritis, and spondyloarthritis, use total hip and knee arthroplasties at high rates. They represent a particularly vulnerable population in the perioperative setting because of their diseases and the immunosuppressant therapies used to treat them. Careful planning among internists, medical specialists, and the surgical team must therefore occur preoperatively to minimize risks in the postoperative period, particularly infection. Management of immunosuppressant medications, such as conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and targeted therapies including biologics, is one avenue by which this infectious risk can be mitigated.

Surgery for patellar dislocation has evolved towards anatomical reconstructions with assessment and treatment of anatomical risk factors.

PURPOSE: Increasing knowledge on the treatment of patellar dislocation has resulted in the development of new surgical techniques for patella stabilisation. National incidence and trends in surgery for patellar dislocation were examined using data from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR). The hypothesis was that an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of patellar instability has increased the popularity of reconstructing damaged structures and modification of anatomical risk factors. METHODS: Data from the years 1997-2016 were collected from the NHDR database using ICD-10 diagnostic codes and the Nomesco Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP) codes. Surgical procedures were categorised into subgroups representing the main surgical approaches of patellar dislocation. Total incidence of surgery for patellar dislocation and change in incidence during the study period were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 9702 operations for patellar dislocation were performed during the study period. Median (IQR) patient age at time of primary surgery was 23 (18-34) years. The total incidence of surgeries remained stable across the study period at of 8.9 per 100,000 person-years. Incidences of ligament reconstruction, femoral osteotomies and osteochondral fragment reimplantation operations multiplied during the study period. Ligament reconstruction procedures were the most performed operations at the end of the study period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of surgical procedures for patellar dislocation remained unchanged during the years 1997-2016. Ligament reconstruction procedures increased in popularity. Surgical techniques have shifted towards the reconstruction of damaged structures and the modification of congenital anatomical risk factors for patellar dislocation. Diversified surgical techniques have enabled the tailoring and combining of stabilizing procedures according to the patient's individual anatomy.

Arthroscopic supraglenoid origin-preserving biceps tenodesis: a reliable, simple, and cost-conscious technique.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the midterm clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of a new all arthroscopic supraglenoid origin-preserving tenodesis technique of the long head of the biceps (LHB) brachii tendon in the setting of small to medium-sized rotator cuff repairs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (33 shoulders) meeting inclusion criteria were identified who underwent LHB tenodesis with this technique in the setting of small to medium-sized rotator cuff repair at a mean age at surgery of 65.6 years between 2015 and 2017. Rotator cuff tears were repaired using the Southern California Orthopedic Institute (SCOI) row technique. The biceps tenodesis was incorporated into the anterior anchor of the rotator cuff repair after bony groove preparation, including débridement and bone vent placement. Frayed edges of the biceps tendon were gently débrided, but the intra-articular glenoid attachment was left intact. Patients were assessed at follow-up by clinical and ultrasonographic examination, as well as a satisfaction questionnaire, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 32.9 months for the 27 patients (30 shoulders), resulting in a 91% follow-up. Average ASES score was 94.4. Average patient-reported satisfaction with shoulder function was 9.4 of 10 and with biceps contour was 9.9 of 10. Average VAS score was 0.6 of 10, and 73% of patients reported a VAS score of 0. Ultrasonography demonstrated an intact biceps tendon in 27 of 28 shoulders and an intact supraspinatus tendon in all 28 shoulders. Mean range of motion was 170° in forward flexion, 169° in abduction, 49° in external rotation, and to thoracic vertebrae 12 in internal rotation. Mean muscle grading during Jobe test was 4.8 of 5. There were no intraoperative complications. No patients required revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In situ arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with maintenance of the glenoid attachment incorporated into rotator cuff repair yields a high rate of healing and consistently excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes as well as patient satisfaction while saving surgical time and cost.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Shoulder Surgery in a Community Orthopedic Practice: A 5-Year Quality Improvement Project Using the QuickDASH Questionnaire.

There has been a shift in US health care to a system that emphasizes value. Patient-reported outcomes have become a critical component of that valuation. A 5-year quality improvement project at the community private practice level was undertaken to assess the authors' delivery of care and practice processes for shoulder surgery as compared with established standards. QuickDASH questionnaires were collected from 1304 consecutive shoulder surgery patients, and data were collected at 4 time points. Mean QuickDASH scores for each procedure and scores assessing biceps tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, workers' compensation status, and sex were analyzed for statistical significance. Rotator cuff repair patients who also underwent biceps tenodesis had statistically significant worse function preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively but not at 1 year postoperatively (P<.05). Rotator cuff repair patients undergoing concomitant distal clavicle excision had statistically significantly higher pre-operative scores (P<.01). Male shoulder arthroplasty patients had statistically significant higher preoperative scores (P<.02). Non-workers' compensation patients had statistically significant higher scores at 1 year (P<.05), whereas workers' compensation patients were statistically significantly younger (P<.01). Maximum changes in scores that met minimal clinically important differences occurred between surgery and 6 months postoperatively in all procedures. Quality outcome studies can be performed in private practice by a single surgeon and yield helpful results that lead to quality improvement through practice and delivery of care processes. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e383-e388.].

Assessment of hand function using the functional dexterity test after opponensplasty in young children with Blauth type 2 hypoplastic thumb.

The functional dexterity test (FDT) is a timed pegboard test based on the manipulation of each peg and suitable for young children as it is both simple and quick to perform. We assessed the postoperative FDT values for children with Blauth type 2 hypoplastic thumbs after opponensplasty. We evaluated hand function using FDT for 12 hands of 11 patients with Blauth type 2 hypoplastic thumbs. Opponensplasty was performed in all hands following by Huber's procedure. All patients were evaluated from 6 to 12 months after surgery for hand function using three types of FDT scores: time in seconds to complete the test (FDT time), combined total time with penalty seconds added to the initial time (FDT total), and the number of pegs per second to complete the task as a percentage against normative values (FDT speed). We compared the postoperative FDT scores with those for Blauth type 1 or 2 hypoplastic thumb patients without surgical treatment. FDT time and FDT total for the patients postoperatively were both significantly shorter than those in the type 2 patients without surgical treatment. FDT speed was significantly higher than that for the patients without surgical treatment. There were no significant differences in the three FDT scores between the postoperative patients and the type 1 patients. There were several limitations including small sample size, large ranges of the data, and high number of variables. FDT reflected postopponensplasty improvement in hand dexterity in young children with Blauth type 2 hypoplastic thumb.

Ultrasound Assessment of the Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Dermal Allograft: An Evaluation of Graft Thickness and Vascularity.

PURPOSE: To assess postoperative changes in the thickness of the dermal allograft of the superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and to evaluate the graft for the presence of intrasubstance pulsatile vessels. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify SCR patients who had ultrasound evaluations between May 2014 and February 2019. Data were collected and stratified based on time from surgery into 2 groups: 0 to 12 months and past the 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure was graft thickness at the articular margin-greater tuberosity interface (tuberosity measurement). Secondary measures included midsubstance graft thicknesses 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 cm medial to the tuberosity measurement; status of lateral graft fixation; presence of pulsatile vessels; and American Shoulder and Elbow Society and visual analog scale scores. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included for analysis. The tuberosity measurement at final follow-up (mean 25 months, range 12-40 months) was (mean ± standard error [95% confidence interval (CI)]) 4.4 ± 0.2 mm (95% CI 4.0-4.8). This differed significantly from the midsubstance measurements: 0.5 cm: 3.6 ± 0.2 mm (95% CI 3.3-4.0, P = .008); 1.0 cm: 3.1 ± 0.2 mm (95% CI 2.7-3.4, P < .001); and 1.5 cm: 2.9 ± 0.2 mm (95% CI 2.6-3.2, P < .001). Ten constructs (56%) showed signs of pulsatile vessels in the first 12 months and all constructs were intact. ASES scores improved from 49.3 ± 4.0 (95% CI 41.6-57.1) preoperatively to 85.1 ± 2.9 (95% CI 79.4-90.8) (P < .001), and VAS scores decreased from 5.3 ± 0.6 (95% CI 4.2-6.5) preoperatively to 0.9 ± 0.3 (95% CI 0.3-1.5) at final follow-up (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The SCR dermal allograft significantly thickens at its lateral aspect, presents with evidence of vasculature in most patients in the first year of implantation, and is not resorbed by the body. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV - therapeutic case series.

Artificial Intelligence and Arthroplasty at a Single Institution: Real-World Applications of Machine Learning to Big Data, Value-Based Care, Mobile Health, and Remote Patient Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Driven by the recent ubiquity of big data and computing power, we established the Machine Learning Arthroplasty Laboratory (MLAL) to examine and apply artificial intelligence (AI) to musculoskeletal medicine. METHODS: In this review, we discuss the 2 core objectives of the MLAL as they relate to the practice and progress of orthopedic surgery: (1) patient-specific, value-based care and (2) human movement. RESULTS: We developed and validated several machine learning-based models for primary lower extremity arthroplasty that preoperatively predict patient-specific, risk-adjusted value metrics, including cost, length of stay, and discharge disposition, to provide improved expectation management, preoperative planning, and potential financial arbitration. Additionally, we leveraged passive, ubiquitous mobile technologies to build a small data registry of human movement surrounding TKA that permits remote patient monitoring to evaluate therapy compliance, outcomes, opioid intake, mobility, and joint range of motion. CONCLUSION: The rapid rate with which we in arthroplasty are acquiring and storing continuous data, whether passively or actively, demands an advanced processing approach: AI. By carefully studying AI techniques with the MLAL, we have applied this evolving technique as a first step that may directly improve patient outcomes and practice of orthopedics.

Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the subacromial spacer for irreparable and massive rotator cuff tears.

PURPOSE: There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal surgical treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT). This study aimed to assess within the Italian health care system the cost-effectiveness of subacromial spacer as a treatment modality for patients with IRCT. METHODS: An expected-value decision analysis was created comparing costs and outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic subacromial spacer implantation, rotator cuff repair (RCR), total shoulder arthroplasty, and conservative treatment for IRCTs. A broad literature search provided input data to extrapolate and inform treatment success and failure rates, costs, and health utility states for these outcomes. The primary outcome assessed was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of subacromial spacer implantation versus shoulder arthroplasty, RCR, and conservative treatment. RESULTS: Subacromial spacer is favorable over both arthroscopic partial repair and shoulder arthroplasty since it costs less than both options and increases effectiveness by 0.06 and 0.10 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. While conservative treatment is the least costly management strategy, subacromial spacer results in a gain of 0.05 QALYs for the additional cost of 522 €, resulting in an ICER of 10,440 €/QALY gain, which is below the standard willingness to pay ratio of $50,000 USD. Strategies with an ICER of less than 50,000 USD are considered to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence and reasonably conservative assumptions, subacromial spacer is likely to provide a safe, effective, and cost-effective option for patients with massive IRCTs. Furthermore, this cost-effectiveness analysis may ultimately serve as a guide for development of health care system and insurer policy as well as clinical practice.

Development of a simple multidisciplinary arthroplasty wound-assessment instrument: the SMArt Wound Tool

Background: There are currently no validated instruments in the orthopedic literature for assessing the healing of acute surgical wounds. The creation of a simple wound-assessment tool would provide a standardized method of reporting wound outcomes. The objective of this study was to systematically develop a wound-assessment tool that can be used to assess the early healing of arthroplasty incisions. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane reviews and CINAHL were searched. Articles that described objective assessment of acute incisional wounds were included. Items for the wound-assessment tool were then extracted from eligible studies based on the frequency of reporting. A multidisciplinary panel of wound experts compiled the items into an initial tool to assess key domains of wound healing. The items were reduced through several iterations of panel discussion. Results: Our search strategy yielded 3743 results, which were screened by title and abstract. Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review for the development of the wound-assessment tool, and 10 domains were extracted based on frequency of reporting. After item reduction, the final version of the wound-assessment tool, the SMArt Wound Tool, contained 3 major domains: blistering, peri-incisional skin colour and exudate type. Conclusion: There is currently a need for a standardized tool to assess the healing of orthopedic surgical incisions. The SMArt Wound Tool provides a simple, objective method of assessing arthroplasty incisions for the presence of early complications.

Contexte: Il n'existe actuellement aucun instrument validé dans la littérature orthopédique pour évaluer la cicatrisation des plaies chirurgicales récentes. La création d'un outil d'évaluation simple des plaies offrirait une méthode standard pour suivre leur évolution. L'objectif de cette étude était de concevoir un outil d'évaluation systématique des plaies pouvant être utilisé pour vérifier la bonne cicatrisation des incisions d'arthroplastie. Méthodes: Les bases de données MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, le registre central Cochrane des essais contrôlés et la base de données Cochrane des revues systématiques ont été interrogés. Les articles qui décrivaient une évaluation objective des plaies d'incision récentes ont été inclus. Les paramètres d'évaluation des plaies ont ensuite été extraits à partir des études retenues en fonction de la fréquence à laquelle ils étaient rapportés. Un comité multidisciplinaire d'experts des plaies a compilé les paramètres pour créer un outil initial d'évaluation des domaines clés de la cicatrisation des plaies. Des discussions successives du comité ont ensuite permis de réduire le nombre de paramètres d'évaluation. Résultats: Notre stratégie d'interrogation a généré 3743 résultats qui ont été triés par titre et résumé. Trente-quatre études ont été retenues pour la revue systématique en vue de la création de l'outil d'évaluation des plaies et 10 domaines ont été extraits en fonction de la fréquence à laquelle ils étaient rapportés. Après la réduction du nombre de paramètres, la version finale de l'outil d'évaluation des plaies, appelé SMArt Wound Tool, comprenait 3 domaines principaux : formation de vésicules, couleur de la peau au pourtour de l'incision et type d'exsudat. Conclusion: On déplore actuellement l'absence d'outils standards pour évaluer la cicatrisation des plaies en chirurgie orthopédique. L'outil SMArt offre une méthode simple et objective d'évaluation des incisions d'arthroplastie pour déceler rapidement la moindre complication, le cas échéant.

Long-Term Results of a Monocentric Series of Soldiers After Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability. Implications for the Assessment of Soldiers' Medical Ability.

Introduction: Stabilizing surgery of the shoulder with a coracoid graft according to Latarjet is a recognized surgical treatment for anterior instability of the shoulder. This pathology frequently affects soldiers. Postoperatively, the potential risk of recurrence or of secondary shoulder arthritis can limit the practitioner in their ability assessment. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term outcomes of this surgery in a military population, in order to assess the possible implications for French soldiers' medical ability. Material and Methods: Twenty soldiers operated on the shoulder by Latarjet procedure by the same surgeon were retrospectively reviewed after more than 15 yr. All of them did regular physical activity for leisure or competitions. None had preoperative osteoarthritis injuries. The number of dislocation recurrences, the functional score, and the rate of radiographic osteoarthritis were assessed. Results: After more than 16.3 yr (extremes: 15-24 yr), none displayed a dislocation recurrence. The average Rowe's score was 91.8 ± 9.9. The average subjective shoulder value was 89.2 ± 9.7. All patients had resumed sport. Three of them developed level 1 or 2 radiological signs of osteoarthritis according to Samilson. No level 3 or 4 osteoarthritis was found. Among all the patients, 14 still did regular physical activity. Discussion: In view of our results and of those from the literature, the results of treatment for anterior shoulder instability with the Latarjet procedure are good, even very good in the long term. These data must be considered to favor this procedure for soldiers with shoulder instability and from a medico-administrative viewpoint for military patients in order to pursue their careers without any job restrictions.

Establishing Maximal Medical Improvement After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: As health care transitions from a pay-for-service to a pay-for-performance infrastructure, the value of orthopaedic care must be defined accurately. Significant efforts have been made in defining quality and cost in arthroplasty; however, there remains a lag in ambulatory orthopaedic care. PURPOSE: Two-year follow-up has been a general requirement for reporting outcomes after rotator cuff repair. However, this time requirement has not been established scientifically and is of increasing importance in the era of value-based health care. Given that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a common ambulatory orthopaedic procedure, the purpose of this study was to establish a time frame for maximal medical improvement (the state when improvement has stabilized) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, identifying studies reporting sequential patient-reported outcomes up to a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The primary clinical outcome was patient-reported outcomes at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Secondary clinical outcomes included range of motion, strength, retears, and complications. Clinically significant improvement was determined between various time intervals by use of the minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: The review included 19 studies including 1370 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair. Clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes was seen up to 1 year after rotator cuff repair, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 year to 2 years. The majority of improvement in strength and range of motion was seen up to 6 months, but no clinically meaningful improvement was seen thereafter. All reported complications and the majority of retears occurred within 6 months after rotator cuff repair. CONCLUSION: After rotator cuff repair, a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and strength was seen up to 1 year after surgery, but not beyond this. This information is important not only to establish appropriate patient expectations but also to determine a time frame for outcome collection after surgery to better define value in orthopaedic care.