Desensitization using pegaspargase in the era of commercially available Erwinia: A single-institution report on efficacy, cost, and resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: Pegaspargase is a therapeutic enzyme that is utilized in treatment regimens targeting pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, many patients experience hypersensitivity reactions, requiring discontinuation of the therapy. Historically, this necessitated switching to an alternative form of the drug, most commonly asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi; however, in recent years this was difficult due to drug shortages and eventually commercial discontinuation. We report here our experience performing pegaspargase desensitizations in patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions. PROCEDURE: Patients with a clinical hypersensitivity reaction to pegaspargase were identified. When due for their next dose, patients were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, bone marrow transplant unit, or oncology unit, and underwent desensitization utilizing a rigorous premedication and multistep dilution-based protocol. Serum asparaginase activity levels were drawn after desensitization to assess for therapeutic levels of enzyme activity. RESULTS: We identified 11 patients who underwent a total of 33 desensitizations to pegaspargase and calaspargase pegol-mknl. No patients experienced clinically significant hypersensitivity reactions necessitating stopping the infusion, nor administration of rescue medications. All serum asparaginase activity levels collected demonstrated enzyme activity levels above predefined therapeutic thresholds. Cost analysis revealed substantial savings when patients received asparaginase desensitization over the now commercially available asparaginase E. chrysanthemi (recombinant) rywn. CONCLUSIONS: Performing desensitization to pegaspargase in the pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia population is feasible, safe, and effective. It is financially advantageous over available alternative approaches, and requires fewer injections and presentations to care.

Eficacia y seguridad de asparaginasa pegilada en el tratamiento de pacientes con leucemia linfoblástica aguda y linfoma linfoblástico con hipersensibilidad a L-asparaginasa nativa / Efficacy and safety of pegylated asparaginase in the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma with hypersensitivity to native L-asparaginase

ANTECECENTES: Como parte de las funciones de la UFETS, se ha elaborado el presente informe sobre el uso de L-asparaginasa pegilada en el tratamiento de pacientes con leucemia linfoblástica aguda (LLA) y linfoma linfoblástico (LL) que presentan hipersensibilidad a L-asparaginasa nativa. En el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas se registran más de 500 casos de linfoma no Hodgkin (LNH) y 90 casos de LL anualmente. La población esperada en el INEN para ambas patologías que requieren asparaginasa pegilada es de 12 pacientes al año. El uso de algún tipo de asparaginasa se encuentra dentro del esquema de inducción ECOG. TECNOLOGÍA: En el presente documento se reporta la evaluación del uso de asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentan hipersensibilidad a asparaginasa nativa. En el INEN se estima una población objetivo de 12 pacientes al año. METODOLOGÍA; Se hizo una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura hasta marzo del 2022, en la cual se encontró un ECA que respondía la pregunta PICO. En este estudio realizado en 76 pacientes con LLA, se observó una menor tasa de respuesta al tratamiento en aquellos con hipersensibilidad a L-asparaginasa nativa que recibieron L-asparaginasa pegilada (38%), en comparación con aquellos sin hipersensibilidad que recibieron L-Asparaginasa pegilada (41%) o Lasparaginasa nativa (47%). Además, los pacientes con hipersensibilidad que recibieron L-asparaginasa pegilada no mostraron mayores niveles de toxicidad que aquellos que recibieron L-asparaginasa nativa. Estos resultados resaltan la potencial utilidad de L-asparaginasa pegilada en el tratamiento antineoplásico de pacientes con hipersensibilidad a L-asparaginasa nativa. Sin embargo, el estudio mostró una baja calidad de evidencia. DISCUSIÓN: Tomando los criterios para un marco de valor de la Health Technology Assessment International (2018) para la toma de decisiones y formulación de la recomendación, se describe: a calidad de la evidencia encontrada es baja. En el ECA se halló que el uso de asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentaron hipersensibilidad por asparaginasa nativa tuvo resultados similares en respuesta completa que en aquellos pacientes que no presentaron hipersensibilidad y continuaron con asparaginasa nativa o asparaginasa pegilada. La calidad de evidencia fue baja, a pesar de que el estudio para el grupo intervención principal (asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentaron hipersensibilidad a la asparaginasa nativa) no recibió aleatorización basal, este presentó características similares a la comparación. El ensayo clínico presentó sesgos, por enmascaramiento de la intervención y solo se encontró un estudio clínico para responder esta pregunta PICO. No se cuenta con estudios de evaluación económica en la región. Sin embargo, en el Reino Unido se realizó una estimación de costos del uso de asparaginasa pegilada. Aquí se proyectó que su uso puede conllevar a ahorro de costos en relación con el uso de asparaginasa nativa. No obstante, se basa en evidencia local del Reino Unido. Se tiene aceptación por parte de los médicos tratantes para continuar el uso de asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentaron hipersensibilidad a la asparaginasa nativa en leucemia linfoblástica aguda y linfoma linfoblástico. Luego de la discusión, el panel concluye que la asparaginasa pegilada es una opción de apoyo en el tratamiento de inducción en pacientes con LLA o LNH que presentan hipersensibilidad a asparaginasa nativa. CONCLUSIONES: La presente evaluación evaluó el uso de asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentaron hipersensibilidad a asparaginasa nativa. La leucemia linfoblástica aguda y el linfoma linfoblástico son el grupo más frecuente de neoplasias hematológicas malignas en población pediátrica. Dentro del esquema de inducción, se encuentra el uso de algún tipo de asparaginasa. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática hasta marzo del 2022, encontrando 1 ECA que respondía la pregunta PICO. El ECA encontró que el uso de asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentaron hipersensibilidad por asparaginasa nativa, tuvo resultados similares en respuesta completa de aquellos pacientes que no presentaron hipersensibilidad y continuaron con asparaginasa nativa o asparaginasa pegilada. La calidad de evidencia fue baja. La asparaginasa pegilada se encuentra disponible en el Perú, y el costo de cada ampolla (750 UI/ml) es de S/ 5 500.00. Revisamos un estudio de costo-efectividad realizado en Reino Unido, donde compararon el uso de asparaginasa pegilada versus asparaginasa nativa como primera línea. Se evidenció que el uso de asparaginasa pegilada aumentaba costos del medicamento, pero reducía costos de estancia hospitalaria y de otros gastos sanitarios comparado con asparaginasa nativa, llevando a un ahorro de £ 4741 libras (Colocar conversión en dólares) (para el sistema sanitario de Reino Unido). En pacientes con leucemia linfoblástica aguda y linfoma linfoblástico se sugiere el uso de asparaginasa pegilada en pacientes que presentan hipersensibilidad al uso de asparaginasa nativa.

A single-center multidisciplinary approach to managing the global Erwinia asparaginase shortage.

The availability of Erwinia Asparaginase has been limited across the world due to manufacturing shortages or for some countries due to the high acquisition cost, putting patients at risk for inferior outcomes. This manuscript provides guidance on how to manage hypersensitivity reactions and utilize therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to conserve and limit Erwinia use. The clinical and financial impact of a multidisciplinary committee are also discussed. Faced with a global Erwinia shortage, a multidisciplinary asparaginase allergy committee was created to review all hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase therapy, staff education was performed on the management of asparaginase hypersensitivity reactions, an institution-wide premedication policy was mandated, and standardized guidelines were created for TDM. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the PEG-asparaginase to Erwinia switch rate from 21% (35 of 163) to 7% (10 of 134) (p = .0035). A multifaceted approach can safely maintain patients on PEG-asparaginase and conserve Erwinia for patients who need it most.

Capped antithrombin III dosing is cost effective in the management of asparaginase-associated thrombosis.

Asparaginase therapy induces a transient antithrombin III (ATIII) deficiency, which contributes to the risk of asparaginase-induced thrombosis. At Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, management of asparaginase-induced thrombosis includes ATIII supplementation during therapeutic anticoagulation with enoxaparin. Due to the expense associated with ATIII, a capped dosing approach for ATIII was evaluated in this population. Peak ATIII levels were obtained following capped doses to evaluate response. In this pilot evaluation, 11 patients received a total of 138 capped doses for a total cost savings of $803 782. This pilot evaluation represents the first reported analysis of capped ATIII dosing in oncology patients.

Cost comparison by treatment arm and center-level variations in cost and inpatient days on the phase III high-risk B acute lymphoblastic leukemia trial AALL0232.

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) develops and implements multi-institutional clinical trials with the primary goal of assessing the efficacy and safety profile of treatment regimens for various pediatric cancers. However, the monetary costs of treatment regimens are not measured. AALL0232 was a COG randomized phase III trial for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia that found that dexamethasone (DEX) was a more effective glucocorticoid than prednisone (PRED) in patients younger than 10 years, but PRED was equally effective and less toxic in older patients. In addition, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) led to better survival than escalating doses of methotrexate (C-MTX). Cost data from the Pediatric Health Information System database were merged with clinical data from the COG AALL0232 trial. Total and component costs were compared between treatment arms and across hospitals. Inpatient costs were higher in the HD-MTX and DEX arms when compared to the C-MTX and PRED arms at the end of therapy. There was no difference in cost between these arms at last follow-up. Considerable variation in total costs existed across centers to deliver the same therapy that was driven by differences in inpatient days and pharmacy costs. The more effective regimens were found to be more expensive during therapy but were ultimately cost-neutral in longer term follow-up. The variations in cost across centers suggest an opportunity to standardize resource utilization for patients receiving similar therapies, which could translate into reduced healthcare expenditures.

Incidence and Management of Toxicity Associated with LAsparaginase in the Treatment of ALL and NK/TCell Lymphoma: an Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Lasparaginase (ASNase) is commonly used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and natural killer (NK)/Tcell lymphoma. This study was designed to describe the incidence of toxicity associated with ASNase in Asian adults. Secondary objectives were to investigate the management and impact of toxicity on subsequent ASNase use, and to compare the actual management against current recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter, observational study, Asian patients ≥ 18 years old who received ≥ 1 dose of the native E. coli ASNase from 2008 to 2013 were included. Patients were excluded if they did not receive ASNase. Endpoints of this study were development of specific toxicities, whether ASNase was discontinued or rechallenged, and developmentg of recurrent toxicity. All data analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were analyzed. Mean (±SD) age was 36.2 (±15.2) years old, with 62.5% being males, 55.4% with ALL and 28.6% with NK/Tcell lymphoma. Hypersensitivity (12.5%) was associated with the highest incidence of toxicity (6 out of 7 patients had Grade 3 and 4 toxicity), followed by 10.7% for hepatic transaminitis, 3.6% for nonCNS thrombosis and 1.8% each for hyperbilirubinemia and pancreatitis. Hypersensitivity recurred in the 3 patients who were rechallenged with E. coli ASNase. CONCLUSIONS: ASNase is associated with a wide range of toxicities, with hypersensitivity being the most commonly observed among Asian adult patients.

Allergic Reactions With Intravenous Compared With Intramuscular Pegaspargase in Children With High-risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Population-based Study From the Maritimes, Canada.

Intravenous (IV) administration of pegaspargase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be associated with an increased risk of allergic reactions, and thus the need for more costly intramuscular (IM) erwinia asparaginase. In 128 patients allergic reactions were documented in 3% and 14% of those who received IM and IV pegaspargase, respectively (P=0.029). These reactions were primarily contributed to by high risk (HR)-ALL patients (P<0.01). The possible decreased efficacy and quality of life and the substantial costs entailed by switching from IV pegaspargase to IM erwinia should prompt reconsideration of the IV administration route for pegaspargase in HR-ALL patients.

Cost-analysis of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with asparaginase preparations: the impact of expensive chemotherapy.

Asparaginase is an expensive drug, but important in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In order to compare costs of PEGasparaginase, Erwinia asparaginase and native E. coli asparaginase, we performed a cost-analysis in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group ALL-10 medium-risk group intensification protocol. Treatment costs were calculated based on patient level data of 84 subjects, and were related to the occurrence of allergy to PEGasparaginase. Simultaneously, decision tree and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The total costs of the intensification course of 30 weeks were $57,893 in patients without PEGasparaginase allergy (n=64). The costs were significantly higher ($113,558) in case of allergy (n=20) necessitating a switch to Erwinia asparaginase. Simulated scenarios (decision tree analysis) using native E. coli asparaginase in intensification showed that the costs of PEGasparaginase were equal to those of native E. coli asparaginase. Also after sensitivity analyses, the costs for PEGasparaginase were equal to those of native E. coli asparaginase. Intensification treatment with native E. coli asparaginase, followed by a switch to PEGasparaginase, and subsequently to Erwinia asparaginase in case of allergy had similar overall costs compared to the treatment with PEGasparaginase as the first-line drug (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in the case of allergy). PEGasparaginase is preferred over native E. coli asparaginase, because it is administered less frequently, with less day care visits. PEGasparaginase is less immunogenic than native E. coli asparaginase and is not more expensive. Asparaginase costs are mainly determined by the percentage of patients who are allergic and require a switch to Erwinia asparaginase.

A review and assessment of drug-induced parotitis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature on drug-induced parotitis. DATA SOURCES: Literature was accessed through MEDLINE/PubMed (1980-May 2012), using the search terms sialadenitis/chemically induced and parotitis/chemically induced. EMBASE (1980-May 2012) was searched using the terms parotitis/diagnosis, sialadenitis/side effect, and parotitis/side effect. International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-May 2012) was searched using the search terms parotitis and sialadenitis. All searches were limited to articles on humans written in English. Inclusion criteria were published letters, case reports, reviews, and clinical trials involving drugs that may be associated with parotitis. Articles pertaining to parotitis induced by iodine-containing drugs were excluded. References of all relevant articles were reviewed for additional citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Review articles, clinical trials, background data, and case reports of drug-induced parotitis were collected and case reports were assessed for causality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Parotitis is an uncommon adverse effect; however, signs and symptoms of parotitis have been noted in case reports as an adverse drug reaction related to various medications. Assessing causality of an adverse drug reaction such as parotitis is challenging. To help determine the probability of causality for these events, algorithms such as the Naranjo probability scale have been developed. Eighty-four case reports of drug-induced parotitis from 40 different drugs were reviewed using a modified Naranjo probability scale that included criteria specific for parotitis. Medications that met the criteria for establishing causality included l-asparaginase with 7 case reports, clozapine with 13 case reports, and phenylbutazone with 13 case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-induced parotitis is a rare adverse drug reaction. Based on the quantitative and qualitative evidence collected from the case reports, medications that are associated with drug-induced parotitis include l-asparaginase, clozapine, and phenylbutazone. Many other drugs have been implicated in the development of parotitis; however, the evidence supporting this association is insufficient to determine causality at this time.

Incidence and management of asparaginase-associated adverse events in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Asparaginase is an enzyme that breaks down extracellular asparagine into aspartic acid and ammonia. Depletion of extracellular asparagine inhibits the growth of lymphocytic leukemic cells. Unlike normal cells, lymphoblasts lack the enzyme to synthesize asparagine and therefore rely on an exogenous source of this amino acid to maintain cellular protein synthesis. Asparagine depletion results in nutritional deprivation, inhibition of protein synthesis, and subsequent apoptotic cell death in lymphoblasts. Asparaginase therapy is an essential component of the treatment protocol for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The effect of asparaginase on protein synthesis may result in a number of toxicities, including thrombosis, pancreatitis, hyperglycemia, and hepatotoxicity. This review discusses the incidence of asparaginase-related adverse events, compares available asparaginase formulations with respect to the emergence of certain toxicities, and considers management strategies for these toxicities in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

The impact of prophylactic fresh-frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate on the incidence of central nervous system thrombosis and hemorrhage in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving asparaginase.

Asparaginase (ASP) therapy is associated with depletion of antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen (FG). Potential toxicities include central nervous system thrombosis (CNST) and hemorrhage. Historical practice at the Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (IWK) involves measuring AT and FG levels after ASP administration and transfusing fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) or cryoprecipitate (CRY) to prevent thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. To determine whether this reduced these complications in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), incidence, outcome, and clinical characteristics of ASP-related CNST in ALL patients at IWK were compared with a similar cohort from BC Children's Hospital (BCCH), where prophylaxis was not performed. Costs associated with preventative versus expectant management were estimated. From 1990 to 2005, 240 patients were treated at IWK and 479 at BCCH. Seven BCCH patients developed venous CNST (1.5%), compared with none at IWK. CNST occurred exclusively during induction. Six patients received anticoagulation and continued ASP. All 7 patients remain in remission. National Cancer Institute high-risk ALL predicted CNST risk (P = .02), whereas sex, age, race, and body mass index did not. Neither FFP nor CRY protected against CNST, suggesting prophylaxis is unwarranted for unselected ALL patients. However, prophylactic replacement for HR patients in induction may be cost-effective.

[The results of a multicenter trial of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment on ALL-MB 91/ALL-BFM 90m in children: analysis of efficacy and toxicity].

AIM: A comparative analysis of efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens: standard German protocol ALL-BFM 90m and less intensive original test protocol ALL-MB 91 in a multicenter trial of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1995-2002 a total of 834 patients with newly diagnosed ALL aged 0-18 years were admitted to 10 clinics of Russia. Of them, 713 were randomized in two groups: treatment program ALL-BFM 90m (n = 355) and ALL-MB 91 program (n = 358). RESULTS: In 7-year follow-up median, 10-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between the groups and was 67 +/- 3 and 68 +/- 3% (ALL-MB 91) and 74 +/- 2, 71 +/- 3% (ALL-BFM 90m), respectively. Though the rate of isolated recurrences in CNS in patients on the protocol ALL-MB 91 was 2.8%, they developed only in 0.8% patients of the standard risk group. Anemia, thrombocytopenia and agranulocytosis developed less frequently, hospital stay was significantly shorter on the test protocol vs the control one (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: EFS and OS on the test (ALL-MB 91) and control (ALL-BFM 90m) protocols were equivalent in lower toxicity and cost of therapy.

Outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with BFM protocol in a resource-constrained setting.

Cure rates for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in developing countries are significantly lower because of problems unique to these countries. We assessed some of the problems in adult ALL patients (>12 years of age) in a tertiary care hospital of northwest India with modified BFM regimen. The diagnosis of ALL was made according to FAB criteria. The protocol consisted of Phase I & II induction, consolidation, reinduction and maintenance phases. CNS prophylaxis was administered with 24 Gy radiation and intrathecal methotrexate. One hundred and eighteen patients (72.9% males), aged 12-68 years (median 23 years) were treated from January 1997 till December 2003. Follow-up of patients was done till December 2005. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 85.6% patients after induction therapy and 40% patient relapsed. Most patients (23.7%) relapsed during the maintenance phase or after completion of chemotherapy. At least 15% of patients (15/101) after successful induction abandoned the treatment because of financial constraints, prolonged travel time to treatment facility and switching over to alternative medicines. Fatal infectious complications occurred in 19.5% of patients. The 3-year and 5-year event free survival rates were 29.8% and 21.6% respectively. In conclusion, modified BFM regimen resulted in high induction rates but relatively poor 5-year event free survival. Infections related death and post induction abandonment of treatment were the main reasons for poor overall results.

Pegaspargase: an alternative?

OBJECTIVE: To review the chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical activity, adverse effects, dosage, and administration guidelines for pegaspargase. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1980-1996), a CANCERLIT search (1983-1996), and a CURRENT CONTENTS search (1980-1996) using the terms pegaspargase, PEG-asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase, polyethylene glycol L-asparaginase, polyethylene glycol conjugated L-asparaginase, and Oncaspar were conducted. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles were considered for possible inclusion in this review. Abstracts were included only when they were judged to add critical information not otherwise available in the medical literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: L-Asparaginase has been a main component of treatment regimens for acute lymphocytic leukemia. A key limiting factor of L-asparaginase use has been the development of hypersensitivity to the drug. Recently, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugated form of L-asparaginase, pegaspargase, has been made available. PEG modification of L-asparaginase has been shown to alter the tendency of the enzyme to induce an immune response and to extend the half-life of the drug. The majority of patients with hypersensitivity to the native enzyme preparations tolerate pegaspargase without further clinical hypersensitivity. The adverse effect profile of pegaspargase is similar to that of the native forms of L-asparaginase. The recommended dosage of pegaspargase is 2500 IU/m2 administered by intramuscular or intravenous injection every 2 weeks in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaspargase is a safe, effective alternative to L-asparaginase in patients who have had clinical hypersensitivity reactions to both Escherichia coli- and Erwinia carotovora-derived L-asparaginase. However, pegaspargase should not be routinely substituted for L-asparaginase.