Influenza-Associated Aspergillosis: Nationwide Trends, Predictors and Outcomes From 2005 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Influenza-associated aspergillosis (IAA) has been increasingly reported in the literature in recent years, but contemporary large-scale data on the morbidity and mortality burden of IAA are lacking. RESEARCH QUESTION: The goal of this study was to estimate the predictors, associations, and outcomes of IAA in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed by using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database from 2005 to 2014 to identify influenza and IAA hospitalizations. Baseline variables and outcomes were compared between influenza hospitalizations without IAA and those with IAA. These variables were then used to perform an adjusted analysis for obtaining predictors and associations of the diagnosis and in-hospital mortality of IAA. RESULTS: Of the 477,556 hospitalizations identified with the principal diagnosis of influenza, IAA was identified in 823 (0.17%) hospitalizations. The IAA cohort consisted more commonly of 45- to 65-year-olds in urban teaching hospitals with substance abuse. Yearly trends revealed that both influenza and IAA hospitalizations have increased over time, with a peak observed in 2009, the year of the influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. Mortality was higher (20.58% vs 1.36%), average length of stay was longer (17.94 vs 4.05 days), and mean cost per hospitalization was higher ($194,932 vs $24,286) in the IAA cohort compared with the influenza cohort without IAA (P < .005). Solid-organ transplantation, hematologic malignancies, and use of invasive mechanical ventilation were associated with higher odds of IAA, among other factors. Use of invasive mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR, 13.43; P < .005), longer length of stay (adjusted OR, 5.47; P < .005), utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (adjusted OR, 4.99; P = .014), and the group aged 45 to 64 years (adjusted OR, 3.03; P = .012) were associated with higher in-hospital mortality in the IAA cohort. INTERPRETATION: Although IAA is a rare complication of influenza hospitalizations, it is associated with increased all-cause mortality, more extended hospital stays, and higher hospital charges compared with influenza without IAA.

Medicolegal Implications of Nosocomial Infections: A Case Report of Aspergillus Contamination during Cardiac Surgery.

Nosocomial infections have become a major issue of public health and lead to an increasing number of suits for damages. We present a rare case of Aspergillus contamination during cardiac surgery, describe the medicolegal investigation, and present the new system for compensation of bodily injury after nosocomial infection in France, based on the law of March 4, 2002 on patient rights and quality in the health system. This case demonstrates the limits of compensation for nosocomial infections on the grounds of national solidarity. The expert report requested by the regional commission for conciliation and compensation is of fundamental importance in enabling the commission to decide between fault and inherent risk of treatment.

Cost analysis of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis among patients with haematological disorders in Germany and Spain.

BACKGROUND: The current healthcare climate demands pharmacoeconomic evaluations for different treatment strategies incorporating drug acquisition costs, costs incurred for hospitalisation, drug administration and preparation, diagnostic and laboratory testing and drug-related adverse events (AEs). Here we evaluate the pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as first-line therapies for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with haematological malignancy and prolonged neutropenia or who were undergoing haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in Germany or Spain. METHODS: A decision analytic model based on a decision tree was constructed to estimate the potential treatment costs of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B. Each model pathway was defined by the probability of an event occurring and the costs of clinical outcomes. Outcome probabilities and cost inputs were derived from the published literature, clinical trials, expert panels and local database costs. In the base case, patients who failed to respond to first-line therapy were assumed to experience a single switch between comparator drugs or the other drug was added as second-line treatment. Base-case evaluation included only drug-management costs and additional hospitalisation costs due to severe AEs associated with first- and second-line therapies. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Cost estimates were inflated to 2011 euros (€). RESULTS: Based on clinical trial success rates of 52.8% (voriconazole) and 50.0% (liposomal amphotericin B), voriconazole had lower total treatment costs compared with liposomal amphotericin B in both Germany (€ 12,256 versus € 18,133; length of therapy [LOT] = 10-day intravenous [IV] + 5-day oral voriconazole and 15-day IV liposomal amphotericin B) and Spain (€ 8,032 versus € 10,516; LOT = 7-day IV + 8-day oral voriconazole and 15-day IV liposomal amphotericin B). Assuming the same efficacy (50.0%) in first-line therapy, voriconazole maintained a lower total treatment cost compared with liposomal amphotericin B. Cost savings were primarily due to the lower drug acquisition costs and shorter IV LOT associated with voriconazole. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were sensitive to drug price, particularly the cost of liposomal amphotericin B. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole is likely to be cost-saving compared with liposomal amphotericin B when used as a first-line treatment for IA in Germany and Spain.

[Economical evaluation of the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in pediatric oncology patients. Santiago. Chile]. / Estudio de costo del tratamiento de la aspergilosis invasora en pacientes oncológicos pediátricos. Santiago. Chile.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a serious opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients. Transplant recipients and patients with cancer represent the highest risk group. The antifungal treatment involves prolonged hospitalization and high economic resources. OBJECTIVE: to estimate costs represented by IA as an intercurrent complication of oncologic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective case-control study. Estimation of the cost of treatment in pediatric oncologic patients with IA in the Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna during the years 2007-2008 was done. A control for each case of IA paired by sex, age, number of diagnosis and clinical department was selected. RESULTS: There were 13 patients during the observation period. The attributable cost of treatment of aspergillosis was US $23,600 and the cost for each indicator was: hospital days US $16,500; antifungal therapy US $7,000; and serum galactomannan US $100. DISCUSSION: In this study, the cost of treating IA is mainly due to hospitalization and antifungal medications. Three patients acquired IA in spite of staying in a protected environment.

Estudio de costo del tratamiento de la aspergilosis invasora en pacientes oncológicos pediátricos: Santiago. Chile / Economical evaluation of the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in pediatric oncology patients: Santiago. Chile

Introducción: La aspergilosis invasora (AI) es una infección oportunista grave en pacientes inmunocompro- metidos. Pacientes receptores de transplantes y oncológicos representan el grupo de mayor riesgo. El tratamiento antifúngico involucra hospitalización prolongada y altos recursos económicos. Objetivo: Estimar los costos involucrados en el tratamiento de la AI como complicación intercurrente en pacientes con cáncer. Pacientes y Método: Estudio caso-control, retrospectivo. Estima el costo del tratamiento de AI en pacientes pediátricos oncológicos del Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna durante los años 2007 y 2008. Resultados: Se incluyeron 13 pacientes con AI y sus respectivos 13 controles. El costo atribuible de la hospitalización en aquellos pacientes que cursaron con AI fue de US $23.600. El costo atribuible para cada indicador fue: US $16.500 para días de hospitalización; US $7.000 para medicamentos antifúngicos y US $100 para galactomanano sérico. Discusión: En este estudio, el costo del tratamiento de AI se debe principalmente a la estadía hospitalaria y fármacos antifúngicos. Encontramos tres pacientes que desarrollaron AI estando en ambiente protegido.

Introduction: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a serious opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients. Transplant recipients and patients with cancer represent the highest risk group. The antifungal treatment involves prolonged hospitalization and high economic resources. Objective: to estimate costs represented by IA as an intercurrent complication of oncologic treatment. Patients and Method: Retrospective case-control study. Estimation of the cost of treatment in pediatric oncologic patients with IA in the Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna during the years 2007-2008 was done. A control for each case of IA paired by sex, age, number of diagnosis and clinical department was selected. Results: There were 13 patients during the observation period. The attributable cost of treatment of aspergillosis was US $ 23,600 and the cost for each indicator was: hospital days US $ 16,500; antifungal therapy US $ 7,000; and serum galactomannan US $ 100. Discussion: In this study, the cost of treating IA is mainly due to hospitalization and antifungal medications. Three patients acquired IA in spite of staying in a protected environment.

[Invasive aspergillosis in hematooncological patients: advantages and disadvantages of various diagnostic methods, treatment options and financial costs of therapy]. / Invazivní aspergilové infekce u hematoonkologických nemocných: význam jednotlivých diagnostických metod, lécebných postupu a nástin financní nárocnosti lécby.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a leading invasive fungal infection in hematooncological patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, diagnostic procedures and treatment of IA in hematooncological department in large hospital in the Czech Republic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical and laboratory records from patients hospitalised in our department with proven/probable IA between January 2000 and December 2006 was performed. RESULTS: 52 cases of IA in 51 patients were identified (17.3% proven IA/82.7% probable IA). Number of IA cases notably increased during study period (1 case of IA in 2000 vs 21 cases of IA in 2006) and majority of them was of nosocomial origin (61.5%). Pulmonary aspergillosis was diagnosed in 46 cases (88.5%). Patients treated for acute leukemia or undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation represent the group at the highest risk of IA (in total 52% of cases). Fever and signs of pulmonary involvement were the most common clinical signs of infection (presented in 92.3% and 69.2 cases respectively). Conventional diagnostic methods including autopsy were able to diagnose only 15 cases of IA (28.8%). In all other cases (71.2%) the diagnosis was done by detection of galactomannan (GM) in serum. Introduction of GM monitoring enabled erlier initiation of antifungal treatment by 4 days. Initial therapy of IA led to the treatment response (partial and complete) in 18 (34.6%) of infections--the highest percentage of response has been seen in voriconazole monotherapy group (42%) and when combination of voriconazole and caspofungin has been used (83%). Salvage therapy was initiated due to the failure of initial treatment in 21 (40.3%) of cases. Patients were treated mostly with combination ofvoriconazole and caspofungin and/or monotherapy with voriconazole has been used with treatment response 55% and 50% respectively. Introduction of new antifungal drugs together with increased number of patients with IA led to the marked increase of total costs spent on treatment of IA per year--from 11,5 thousands CZK in 2000 to 6,2 millions CZK in 2006. CONCLUSIONS: IA is the most frequent cause of infection-related mortality in patients with haematological malignancies. Routine use of non-culture base methods in diagnosis of IA together with treatment using new, effective antifungals can improve prognosis of patients with this life threatening infection.