Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly, Part I: assessment and diagnosis.

Non-synostotic deformational plagiocephaly (DP) is head asymmetry that results from external forces that mold the skull in the first year of life. Primary care providers are most likely to encounter DP when infants present for well-child care, and for this reason it is important that providers be competent in assessing, diagnosing, and participating in the prevention and management of DP. The purpose of this two-part series on DP is to present an overview of assessment, diagnosis, and evidence-based management of DP for health care providers. In Part I we provide a brief background of DP and associated problems with torticollis and infant development, and we present strategies for visual and anthropometric assessment of the infant with suspected DP. We also provide tools for differentiating DP from craniosynostosis and for classifying the type and severity of lateral and posterior DP. Part II (to be published in a future issue of the Journal of Pediatric Health Care) provides a synthesis of current evidence and a clinical decision tool for evidence-based management of DP.

The orthodontic-restorative interface: 1. Patient assessment.

UNLABELLED: The first article in this series of two aims to outline the assessment of patients for whom a combined orthodontic-restorative approach would be beneficial. In particular, it will concentrate on the assessment of patients who have hypodontia and tooth size discrepancies. The importance of the aesthetic assessment for these cases will be highlighted. Variations in tooth number and tooth size discrepancy often require a combined treatment planning approach from the orthodontist and restorative dentist. The referring general dental practitioner has a key role in recognizing that this approach may be required and highlighting this in the initial patient referral. It is likely in the more straightforward cases that the GDP will be providing the restorative treatment and so an increased understanding of these cases would be beneficial. In the second paper, treatment options will be presented. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For patients who require a combined orthodontic/restorative approach, it is important that orthodontic and restorative disciplines liaise closely in the assessment and treatment planning process so that optimal care may be planned.

Reversible vs. nonreversible fillers in facial aesthetics: concerns and considerations.

Soft-tissue augmentation of the face is an increasingly popular cosmetic procedure. In recent years, the number of available filling agents has also increased dramatically, improving the range of options available to physicians and patients. Understanding the different characteristics, capabilities, risks, and limitations of the available dermal and subdermal fillers can help physicians improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications. The most popular fillers are those made from cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA). A major and unique advantage of HA fillers is that they can be quickly and easily reversed by the injection of hyaluronidase into areas in which elimination of the filler is desired, either because there is excess HA in the area or to accelerate the resolution of an adverse reaction to treatment or to the product. In general, a lower incidence of complications (especially late-occurring or long-lasting effects) has been reported with HA fillers compared with the semi-permanent and permanent fillers. The implantation of nonreversible fillers requires more and different expertise on the part of the physician than does injection of HA fillers, and may produce effects and complications that are more difficult or impossible to manage even by the use of corrective surgery. Most practitioners use HA fillers as the foundation of their filler practices because they have found that HA fillers produce excellent aesthetic outcomes with high patient satisfaction, and a low incidence and severity of complications. Only limited subsets of physicians and patients have been able to justify the higher complexity and risks associated with the use of nonreversible fillers.

Objective outcome analysis of soft shell helmet therapy in the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly.

Deformational plagiocephaly, cranial asymmetry secondary to positioning, continues to be a leading cause of head shape abnormalities in infants. Treatment recommendations include nonintervention, positioning therapies, and helmet therapy. Although most agree that surgical intervention is rarely indicated, the ideal therapy is not agreed on. Some even debate the necessity of treatment, especially third-party payers. The purpose of this prospective study is to use an objective outcome analysis tool, computerized tomography, to assess the efficacy of a soft shell helmet therapy. Sixty-nine children with a diagnosis of deformational plagiocephaly were enrolled in this study to assess the success of a soft shell helmet for the correction of cranial asymmetry. Computed tomography scanning was done before therapy and 6 months after the initiation of therapy. Three-dimensional reconstructions of these scans were reformatted into a standardized orientation by utilizing the nasion (radix), frontozygomatic suture lines, and posterior aspect of the foramen magnum. Intracranial volumes were calculated on a quadrant basis, and asymmetry was evaluated with regard to the hemispheres (left versus right) and the posterior quadrants. Thirty-four children (27 boys and 7 girls) completed the study protocol. The side involved was the right in 62% of cases and the left in 38%. Mean age at the initial scan was 6.3 months, and mean age at the follow-up scan was 14 months. Mean duration of helmet therapy was 7 months. Compliance with therapy was average to above average in 88% of the children and poor in 12%. There was a 36% to 54% improvement in asymmetry in the compliant patients over the 6-month study period. Soft shell helmet therapy is an effective technique to decrease cranial asymmetry based on objective outcome measurements. Additionally, it is cost-effective, with the total cost of therapy for the helmet and office visits ranging from 600 dollars to 700 dollars. This therapy compares favorably with other more expensive and time-consuming therapies that have been reported in the literature.

Microssomia craniofacial e perda auditiva: avaliação audiométrica em 15 casos / Craniofacial microsomia and hearing loss: audiometric assessment of 15 cases

Microssomia craniofacial é uma síndrome congênita que afeta as estruturas derivadas do primeiro e segundo arcos branquiais, acometendo mais freqüentemente a mandíbula e a orelha. A perda auditiva na microssomia craniofacial se deve às malformações das estruturas auriculares, no entanto não existem estudos mostrando correlação entre o grau da microssomia craniofacial e o grau de comprometimento auditivo. Foram selecionados aleatoriamente 15 exames audiométricos em pacientes portadores de microssomia craniofacial entre 2001 e 2002. Todos os exames foram realizados com o aparelho Midimate 602 e Audiotest 227. Foram avaliados 15 pacientes, 8 mulheres e 7 homens, com média de idade de 8,5 anos, sendo 1 caso bilateral. Quatorze pacientes apresentavam microtia, e destes, 11 não apresentavam conduto auditivo externo. O tipo de perda auditiva mais freqüente foi a condutiva, em 12 casos. A média do déficit auditivo foi de 63,76dB. A malformação dos componentes auditivos é frequente e o acompanhamento com exames audiométricos pode detectar precocemente déficits auditivos levando a uma melhor reabilitação. Com a realização de exames audiométricos na avaliação de pacientes portadores de microssomia craniofacial propicia-se melhor desenvolvimento psicossocial destes pacientes.

Craniofacial microsomia is a congenital syndrome affecting the structures derived from first and second branchial archs. Most commonly the ear and jaws are involved. Hearing loss in this syndrome is due to auricular structures malformation, however there is not proved correlation between the severity of malformation and hearing loss. Fifteen audiometry performed in 2001 and 2002 were randomly selected between patients with craniofacial microsomia. All tests were performed with Midimate 602 e Audiotest 227 device. Fifteen patients were evaluated, 8 women and 7 men, the mean age was 8,5 years and one case was bilateral. Fourteen patients had microtia and eleven external auditory canal agenesia. The most common hearing loss was conductive. Hearing deficit mean was 63,76 dB. Auditive components malformation is frequent is this syndrome and audiometry evaluation may improve rehabilitation in patients in which hearing loss in early detected. Audiometry should be employed in craniofacial microsomia initial evaluation leading to better psicosocial development.

Assessment, documentation, and treatment of a developing facial asymmetry following early childhood injury.

Prepubertal trauma is often implicated as the cause of asymmetric growth of the mandible. A series of photographs taken before and after early childhood injury to the orofacial complex illustrates the development of a three-dimensional dentofacial deformity in a patient. The diagnosis and combined surgical orthodontic treatment plan to correct the facial asymmetry and malocclusion are discussed.

A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible.

The purpose of this article was to assess and quantify the different components that can lead to mandibular asymmetry in a person during or at the end of growth and to investigate the extent to which improvement can be obtained in the different situations. Three boys and 17 girls, 8 to 21 years of age, with facial asymmetry and chin deviation were selected. Posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs were taken in intercuspal position. On each radiograph, three mandibular points (menton, gonion or antegonion, and articular point) were selected to define a mandibular area. A vertical axis of reference was also determined. Computer-aided design was employed to develop two systems (A and B) to assess a symmetry degree of the mandible. With system A, the left mandibular area was rotated around the vertical axis of reference, and the degree of the superimposition between the left and right areas was plotted. With system B, the left area was rotated around an axis that ran through menton and was perpendicular to a line connecting the two articular points of the mandible. Also, in this case, the degree of superimposition between the two areas was plotted. With system A, the degree of superimposition was a function of mandibular position and mandibular symmetry. With system B, it was a function of mandibular symmetry only. Thus through comparative examination of the data, assessment of displacement asymmetry and structural asymmetry was possible. In two patients, only displacement asymmetry was present, whereas 14 patients showed various features of structural asymmetry. The patients were treated with orthopedic splints to keep the mandible in a position of symmetry. Orthodontic treatment followed so that the intercuspal position would finally coincide with the position of symmetry. Computer-aided design analysis was performed again after a mean observation period of 41.1 months. In 11 patients an improvement in symmetry was observed with both systems. The patients in whom no improvement of structural asymmetry was observed showed a relatively high degree of symmetry at the beginning or had a considerably higher age than the mean age of the whole group. The clinical implications of the data are discussed.