Rural Veterans' Experiences With Outpatient Care in the Veterans Health Administration Versus Community Care.

BACKGROUND: The 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act was intended to improve Veterans' access to timely health care by expanding their options to receive community care (CC) paid for by the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Although CC could particularly benefit rural Veterans, we know little about rural Veterans' experiences with CC. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare rural Veterans' experiences with CC and VA outpatient health care services to those of urban Veterans and examine changes over time. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) and VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Subjects: All Veterans who responded to the SHEP survey in Fiscal Year (FY) 16 or FY19. MEASURES: Outcomes were 4 measures of care experience (Access, Communication, Coordination, and Provider Rating). Independent variables included care setting (CC/VA), rural/urban status, and demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with urban Veterans, rural Veterans rated CC the same (for specialty care) or better (for primary care). Rural Veterans reported worse experiences in CC versus VA, except for specialty care Access. Rural Veterans' care experiences improved between FY16 and FY19 in both CC and VA, with greater improvements in CC. CONCLUSIONS: Rural Veterans' reported comparable or better experiences in CC compared with urban Veterans, but rural Veterans' CC experiences still lagged behind their experiences in VA for primary care. As growing numbers of Veterans use CC, VA should ensure that rural and urban Veterans' experiences with CC are at least comparable to their experiences with VA care.

Eliciting preferences for outpatient care experiences in Hungary: A discrete choice experiment with a national representative sample.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are central to inform on the responsiveness of health systems to citizens' health care needs and expectations. At their current form, PREMs do not reflect the weights that patients assign to varying aspects of the care experience. We aimed to investigate patients' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for attributes of the care experience in outpatient settings. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among a representative sample of the general adult population of Hungary (n = 1000). Choice set attributes and levels were defined based on OECD's standardized PREMs (e.g. a doctor spending enough time in consultation, providing easy to understand explanations, giving opportunity to ask questions, and involving in decision making) and a price attribute. Conditional and mixed logit analyses were conducted. WTP estimates were computed in preference and WTP space. RESULTS: The respondents most preferred attribute was that of a doctor spending enough time in consultation, followed by involvement in decision making. Moreover, waiting times had a less important effect on respondents' choice preference compared with aspects of the doctor-patient relationship. Estimates in the WTP space varied from €4.38 (2.85-5.90) for waiting an hour less at a doctor's office to €36.13 (32.07-40.18) for a consultation where a doctor spends enough time with a patient relative to a consultation where a doctor does not. CONCLUSIONS: A preference-based PREMs approach provide insight on the value patients assign to different aspects of their care experience. This can inform the decisions of policy-makers and other stakeholders to coordinate efforts and resource allocation in a more targeted manner, by acting on attributes of the care experience that have a greater impact on the implementation of patient-centered care.

Patients' preferences in selecting family physician in primary health centers: a qualitative-quantitative approach.

BACKGROUND: The role of family physicians (FPs) in the metropolitan area is critical in identifying risk factors for disease prevention/control and health promotion in various age groups. Understanding patients' preferences and interests in choosing a FP can be an effective and fundamental step in the success of this program. In this study factors affecting the FP selection by Iranian patients referred to health centers in the most populous areas in the south of Tehran were assessed and ranked. METHODS: A sequential mixed-method (qualitative-quantitative) triangulation approach was designed with three subject groups of patients, physicians, and health officials. The Framework method was used to analyze interviews transcribed verbatim. After implementing an iterative thematic process, a 26-item quantitative questionnaire with high validity and reliability was drafted to evaluate the different factors. A convenient sampling method was used to select 400 subjects on a population-based scale to quantitatively rank the most critical selection factors as a mean score of items. RESULTS: The selection factors were divided into six centralized codes, including FPs' ethics, individual, professional and performance factors; patients' underlying disease and individual health, and disease-related factors, office's location and management factors, democracy factors, economic factors, and social factors. After filling out the questionnaires, the most important factors in selecting FP were a specialist degree in family medicine (FM) (4.49 ± 0.70), performing accurate examinations with receiving a detailed medical history (4.43 ± 0.68), and spending enough time to visit patients (4.28 ± 0.75), respectively. However, the parameters such as being a fellow-citizen, being the same gender, and physician's appearance were of the least importance. CONCLUSION: There is a possibility to screen the most important factors affecting the FP choice through the combination of qualitative and quantitative studies. The first and last patients' priority was physicians' specialty in FM and being a fellow-citizen with them, respectively. The clinical and administrative healthcare systems should schedule the entire implementation process to oversee the doctor's professional commitment and setting the visit times of FP.

Insights in Public Health: Outpatient Care Gaps for Patients Hospitalized with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in Hawai'i: Beyond Access and Continuity of Care.

Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are conditions that can generally be managed in community-based healthcare settings, and, if managed well, should not require hospital admission. A 5-year, mixed methods study was recently concluded that (1) documented disparities in hospitalizations for ACSCs in Hawai'i through quantitative analysis of state-wide hospital discharge data; and (2) identified contributing factors for these hospitalizations through patient interviews. This Public Health Insights article provides deeper context for, and consideration of, a striking study finding: the differences between typical measures of access to care and the quality of patient/provider interactions as reported by study participants. The themes that emerged from the patients' stories of their own potentially preventable hospital admissions shed light on the importance of being heard, trust, communication, and health knowledge in their relationships with their providers. We conclude that improving the quality of the relationship and level of engagement between the patient and community/outpatient providers may help reduce hospitalizations for ACSCs in Hawai'i and beyond. These interpersonal-level goals should be supported by systems-level efforts to improve health care delivery and address health disparities.

What could be influencing older Ghanaians outpatient care utilization rate?

OBJECTIVES: Ghana's population is rapidly aging and there may be healthcare access and utilization issues. This study investigates some of the issues that may influence outpatient care utilization rate among older Ghanaians. METHODS: Cross-sectional wave 1 (2007-2010) data from WHO's Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health are used, and a sample of 1408 are analyzed. After multiple imputations of missing values, a negative binomial regression model is used to identify the association between outpatient care utilization rate and lifestyle activities. RESULTS: The rate of outpatient care utilization is negatively associated with the rate of eating vegetables (ß =0.0830, p < .001), fruits (ß =0.0033, p < .05), moderate-exercise (ß =0.4010, p < .001), moderate-work (ß =0.2049, p < .001), walking/biking (ß = 0.0436, p < .001), and positively associated with leisure hours ((ß =0.0194, p < .001). CONCLUSION: To promote better aging situations of older adults in Ghana, poverty and poor education should be addressed as potential barriers to healthcare access. There is a need for policies that encourage healthier lifestyles for older Ghanaian's health. FUNDING: The study was self-funded by the authors.

Online survey to assess parents' experience and preferences for follow-up visits for children living with type 1 diabetes in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: It is accepted that although patients may initiate a visit to a healthcare provider, follow-up visits are often based on recommendations from providers. This suggests that follow-up care, since not initiated by patients, may not reflect patients' perception of a need for care. However, few studies have examined the burden of regular follow-up care and patients' perceived value of such care. For parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), follow-up visits are scheduled regardless of how well controlled the diabetes is. Our study examines how benefits and burden from the parents' perspective could affect their preferences in regard to the frequency of regular follow-up care. METHODS: We aim to develop an online patient survey to be distributed to parents of children living with T1D in the province of Quebec, Canada. The survey will be available in French and English, and distributed through diabetes clinics, on social media groups and forums for parents of children with T1D. The survey will be developed in collaboration with parents of children with T1D to ensure that it appropriately reflects the services in regular follow-up care and that the language is understandable and clear. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will be informed of the requirements and objectives of the survey at the beginning of the questionnaire and that the data collected will remain anonymous and confidential. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the research ethics committee of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval. Results of the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders with the aim of improving practices and better meeting patients' and families' needs.

Perspectives of ambulatory patients visiting the emergency department during the Christmas and New Year holiday period: Descriptive survey.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions of ambulatory patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of symptom acuity and access to care; the proportion of ambulatory patients who contacted their GPs before attending the ED; and patients' knowledge about whether their GPs provide after-hours or walk-in services. DESIGN: Descriptive survey and proportion test comparisons for data analysis. SETTING: Kingston, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: All ambulatory patients presenting to the ED from December 22, 2016, to January 2, 2017 ("holiday surge" period), and from September 25, 2017, to October 1, 2017 (nonholiday period). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' perceptions of symptom acuity and access to primary care; proportion of patients who contacted their GPs before attending the ED; and patients' knowledge about their GPs' after-hours or walk-in services. RESULTS: Overall, 1638 patients during the holiday surge period and 642 patients during the nonholiday period completed the survey (response rate of 54.8% and 38.3%, respectively). Out of all 2280 participants, 530 (23.2%) contacted their GP before going to the ED; 1514 (66.4%) participants decided to go to the ED on their own, and about half of them (795 of 1514 [52.5%]) believed their problem was urgent and could not wait for a GP. A third of all participants (825 of 2280 [36.2%]) believed their GP could have managed their medical problem if they could have gotten an appointment that day. Among a subgroup of participants with a GP, 1095 (52.5%) were aware of off-hour services provided by their GP. There were no statistically significant differences in responses between the holiday and nonholiday periods. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of ambulatory patients would have seen their GP for their medical issue if they thought that they had same-day or next-day access. There is a need for general and emergency physicians to work together on improving access to acute care services.

Changes in Patient Visits After the Implementation of Insurance Billing at a Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic in a Medicaid Expansion State.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid expansion has led to unique opportunities for sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics to improve the sustainability of services by billing insurance. We evaluated changes in patient visits after the implementation of insurance billing at a STD clinic in a Medicaid expansion state. METHODS: The Rhode Island STD Clinic offered HIV/STD screening services at no cost to patients until October 2016, when insurance billing was implemented. Care for uninsured patients was still provided for free. We compared the clinic visits in the preinsurance period with the postinsurance period using t-tests, Poisson regressions, and a logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 5560 patients were seen during the preinsurance (n = 2555) and postinsurance (n = 3005) periods. Compared with the preinsurance period, the postinsurance period had a significantly higher average number of patient visits/month (212.9 vs. 250.4, P = 0.0016), including among patients who were black (36.8 vs. 50.3, P = 0.0029), Hispanic/Latino (50.8 vs. 65.8, P = 0.0018), and insured (106.3 vs. 130.1, P = 0.0025). The growth rate of uninsured (+0.10 vs. +4.11, P = 0.0026) and new patients (-4.28 vs. +1.07, P = 0.0007) also increased between the two periods. New patients whose first visit was before the billing change had greater odds (adjusted odds ratio, 2.68, 95% confidence interval, 2.09-3.44; P < 0.0001) of returning compared with new patients whose first visit was after the billing change. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of insurance billing at a publicly funded STD clinic, with free services provided to uninsured individuals, was associated with a modest increase in patient visits and a decline in patients returning for second visits.

Needs and preferences of informal caregivers regarding outpatient care for the elderly: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers are an essential pillar for ensuring and maintaining the outpatient care of the frail elderly. Due to demographic changes, including an increase in the number of people in need of care as well as changing social structures (full-time employment of women, increasing number of single households, etc.) these informal care structures are fraught by considerable challenges. To support and facilitate informal caregivers in their role of nursing, it is important to identify their preferences, needs, and thus create a preference-oriented system. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify preferences and needs regarding the organization of informal care. The database searches were performed by using EMBASE, Scopus and Dimdi. RESULTS: A total of 44 studies were included in the present review. Studies from 17 different countries provide broad international perspectives. Besides the preferences for long-term care structure, the following four principal topics were identified: (1) informational needs; (2) support needs; (3) organizational needs, and (4) needs for societal recognition. CONCLUSION: To meet the current challenges in the outpatient or home-based care of elders, it is essential to strengthen the role of informal caregivers. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt and further develop informal care structures according to the needs of informal caregivers. However, demographic, financial and cultural aspects of each country need to be considered as these may influence the preferences and needs of informal caregivers.

An Opinion Survey of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgeons Working in Outpatient Care (Society, Laws and Patients). / Eine Meinungsumfrage bei niedergelassenen Fachärzten für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (Gesellschaft, Gesetz und Patienten).

BACKGROUND: The German health care system is well accepted, but efficiency, costs and patient satisfaction are sometimes criticised. Opinions and models prevail, and empirical data are rarely presented, although quantitative data are a precondition to assess the acceptance of the health care system. METHOD: To determine the appraisal of the patient-doctor relationship, economic situation and cooperation with clinical institutions, a 37 item was developed where participants indicated their agreement with a statement on a four point Likert scale. This questionnaire was answered by 525 German orthopaedic and/or traumatology surgeons, representing 7.7% of all German specialists working in outpatient care. RESULTS: 75% of all respondents felt challenged by demanding patients and a need for justification; what was less pronounced was the feeling of being exploited as physicians. Restrictions in medical treatment from budgeting expenses were seen by 74%. More than 90% considered that it was impossible to finance their medical practice expenses by conservative medical treatment only. The respondents felt similarly critical about the current cooperation with hospitals - only 19% were not interested in closer cooperation and 96% advocated higher fees for this cooperation. 74% confirmed that hospitals are taking over outpatient tasks, whereas only 35% agreed that more clinical patient care can be provided by outpatient providers, especially due to legal restrictions. DISCUSSION: Practitioning orthopaedic and traumatology surgeons feel exploited by uninformed patients, misallocation of reimbursement funds and legal restrictions, as well as unilateral substitution of outpatient care by hospitals. They do not consider that the current structures are sustainable for long term patient care.

Randomized controlled trial of telephone monitoring with psychiatry inpatients with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders.

Background Psychiatry inpatients frequently have co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders, which are related to poor post-discharge outcomes. Telephone monitoring is effective in specialty substance use disorder treatment settings in increasing continuing care and 12-step program utilization and improving substance use outcomes. This study examined the effectiveness of telephone monitoring among psychiatry inpatients with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders. Methods This randomized controlled trial (n = 406) compared usual care to usual care plus telephone monitoring (one in-person session during the inpatient stay, followed by weekly telephone contact for three months post-discharge). Follow-ups were conducted at end-of-intervention (three months post-baseline) and nine and 15 months post-baseline (73% followed). Primary outcomes were number of days out of the past 30 of drinking alcohol, using drugs, and experiencing psychological problems. Secondary outcomes were outpatient substance use treatment, and 12-step group, utilization. Results Longitudinal modeling found that patients in both conditions improved over time on each primary outcome. Improvement was comparable between conditions on alcohol and drug use and psychological problems. Receipt of outpatient treatment decreased over the follow-up period and was not related to condition. Likelihood of attending 12-step group meetings did not change over follow-ups, and was not related to condition. Conclusions Improvement over time was evident regardless of condition assignment. Patients maintained attendance at 12-step groups from pre- to post-discharge. Short-term telephone monitoring in addition to usual care for patients with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders may not be sufficiently intensive to achieve additional improvements on outcomes.

Engaging High-Need Patients in Intensive Outpatient Programs: A Qualitative Synthesis of Engagement Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Intensive outpatient programs address the complex medical, social, and behavioral needs of individuals who account for disproportionate healthcare costs. Despite their promise, the impact of these programs is often diminished due to patient engagement challenges (i.e., low rates of patient participation and partnership in care). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify intensive outpatient program features and strategies that increase high-need patient engagement in these programs. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty program leaders and clinicians from 12 intensive outpatient programs in academic, county, Veterans Affairs, community, and private healthcare settings. APPROACH: A questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were used to identify common barriers to patient engagement in intensive outpatient programs and strategies employed by programs to address these challenges. We used content analysis methods to code patient engagement barriers and strategies and to identify program features that facilitate patient engagement. KEY RESULTS: The most common barriers to patient engagement in intensive outpatient programs included physical symptoms/limitations, mental illness, care fragmentation across providers and services, isolation/lack of social support, financial insecurity, and poor social and neighborhood conditions. Patient engagement strategies included concrete services to support communication and use of recommended services, activities to foster patient trust and relationships with program staff, and counseling to build insight and problem-solving capabilities. Program features that were identified as enhancing engagement efforts included: 1) multidisciplinary teams with diverse skills, knowledge, and personalities to facilitate relationship building; 2) adequate staffing and resources to handle the demands of high-need patients; and 3) a philosophy that permitted flexibility and patient-centeredness. CONCLUSIONS: Promising clinical, interpersonal, and population-based approaches to engaging high-need patients frequently deviate from standard practice and require creative and proactive staff with adequate time, resources, and flexibility to address patients' needs on patients' terms.

Do naloxone access laws increase outpatient naloxone prescriptions? Evidence from Medicaid.

BACKGROUND: Naloxone is a prescription medication that can quickly and effectively reverse opioid overdose. Medicaid is a major payer of substance use disorder services, and Medicaid beneficiaries experience especially high rates of opioid overdose. As opioid overdose rates have risen sharply, every state has modified its laws to make naloxone easier to access. The aim of this paper is to determine whether implementation of different provisions of naloxone access laws led to increased naloxone dispensing financed by Medicaid. METHODS: We reviewed naloxone legislation passed by every state between 2007 and 2016. We used the Medicaid State Drug Utilization dataset to examine the effect of different types of state naloxone access law provisions, separately and as a whole, on the number of outpatient naloxone prescriptions reimbursed by Medicaid from 2007 to 2016. We included state-level covariates in our models that may be correlated with naloxone utilization in Medicaid and passage of naloxone access laws. RESULTS: We found that the presence of any naloxone law was significantly associated with increases in outpatient naloxone reimbursed through Medicaid. Laws containing standing order provisions were most consistently associated with increases in naloxone dispensing across models. Standing order provisions led on average to an increase of approximately 33 naloxone prescriptions per state-quarter, which is equivalent to 74% of the average number of naloxone prescriptions per state-quarter. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone access laws, particularly those with standing order provisions, appear to be an effective policy approach to increasing naloxone access among Medicaid beneficiaries.

Cancer patients' wish for psychological support during outpatient radiation therapy : Findings from a psychooncological monitoring program in clinical routine.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently suffer from physical and psychosocial impairments due to their disease and its treatment. Psychooncology (PO) can help to cope with stress resulting from outpatient radiotherapy (RT) treatment. There are currently few data regarding patients' wishes for PO support. The aim of this study was to investigate the number of patients with a wish for PO, treatment paths, and predictors of the wish for PO among cancer patients at the beginning of RT. METHODS: The results of routine psychological stress screening (Hornheide screening instrument; cut-off  ≥ 4) of 944 cancer patients between 2015 and 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective cross-sectional study. Predictors for a wish for PO support were identified by stepwise binary logistic regression, in which sociodemographic and treatment data were included in addition to the screening items. RESULTS: Around 20% of patients had above-average stress levels and 13% expressed a wish for PO support (participation rate was approximately 55%). Low emotional wellbeing (OR = 11.3) and lack of social support (OR = 9.4) were strong predictors for this treatment wish. Among patients with pancreatic cancer, head and neck tumors, and hematologic disease, there was a substantial difference between the degree of psychological stress and the wish for treatment. Patients with urological (23.5%) and lung tumors (20.9%) most frequently expressed a wish for PO support. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported psychosocial problems were better predictors of a wish for PO support than sociodemographic or clinical data. Stress screening should thus be implemented in clinical routine.

Community-Based Accompaniment and the Impact of Distance for HIV Patients Newly Initiated on Antiretroviral Therapy: Early Outcomes and Clinic Visit Adherence in Rural Rwanda.

Community-based accompaniment (CBA) has been associated with improved antiretroviral therapy (ART) patient outcomes in Rwanda. In contrast, distance has generally been associated with poor outcomes. However, impact of distance on outcomes under the CBA model is unknown. This retrospective cohort study included 537 adults initiated on ART in 2012 in two rural districts in Rwanda. The primary outcomes at 6 months after ART initiation included overall program status, missed a visit and missed three consecutive visits. The associations between cost surface distance (straight-line distance adjusted for surface features) and outcomes were assessed using logistic regression, controlling for potential confounders. Died/lost-to-follow-up and missed three consecutive visits were not associated with distance. Patients within 0-1 km cost surface distance were significantly more likely to miss a visit, potentially due to stigma of attending clinic within one's community. These results suggest that CBA may mediate the impact of long distances on outcomes.

Factors for incomplete adherence to antiretroviral therapy including drug refill and clinic visits among older adults living with human immunodeficiency virus - cross-sectional study in South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To assess adherence outcomes to antiretroviral therapy (ART) of recipients ≥50 years in Soweto, South Africa. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis for a cross-sectional study at two HIV clinics in Soweto. Data on ART adherence and covariates were gathered through structured interviews with HIV 878 persons living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving ART. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations. RESULTS: PLHIV ≥50 years (n = 103) were more likely to miss clinic visits during the last six months than PLHIV aged 25-49 (OR 2.15; 95%CI 1.10-4.18). PLHIV ≥50 years with no or primary-level education were less likely to have missed a clinic visit during the last six months than PLHIV with secondary- or tertiary-level education in the same age category (OR 0.3; 95%CI 0.1-1.1), as were PLHIV who did not disclose their status (OR 0.2; 95%CI 0-1.1). There was no evidence of increased risk for non-adherence to ART pills and drug refill visits among older PLHIV. CONCLUSION: Missing a clinic visit was more common among older PLHIV who were more financially vulnerable. Further studies are needed to verify these findings and identify new risk factors associated with ART adherence.

Antenatal care visits' absenteeism at a secondary care medical facility in Southwest Nigeria.

Antenatal care (ANC) is a specialised pattern of care organised for pregnant women with the goal of maintaining good health and promoting safe delivery of healthy infants. It is an indispensable part of effective maternity care services. This study identified the factors responsible for absenteeism from ANC follow-up visits. It was a hospital-based prospective cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at a faith based secondary healthcare facility in Ibadan, Nigeria. Relevant data were retrieved using interviewer-administered structured questionnaires and antenatal health record cards. The major reasons identified for absenteeism were delay in receiving hospital services due to long queues at service points and understaffing. The pregnant women aged 35 years and above were the most likely to miss the visits. Therefore, there is the need for hospital administrators and health care givers to make the services patient-friendly.

Blood pressure profile in pregnancy: The impact of its duration on results and patients' well-being.

BACKGROUND: A blood pressure profile (BPP) is often used to diagnose and manage hypertension in pregnancy. However, there is no consensus on the number and interval of blood pressure (BP) readings required. AIMS: To ascertain whether BP readings at 15-min interval over one hour yields clinically equivalent results to readings at 60-min interval over three hours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty unique women were recruited to this prospective study. Automated BP machines were used to take readings at 15-min interval over one hour and at 60-min interval over three hours. The mean systolic and diastolic BPs obtained using each regimen were calculated and compared. Women also completed a questionnaire to evaluate the psychosocial and financial impact of a prolonged outpatient investigation. RESULTS: BP readings from 67 patients were included for analysis. Clinical equivalence was assessed using the British Hypertension Society (BHS) validation criteria for comparing nonmercury devices to the gold-standard calibrated mercury device. Mean SBP readings for 54% (36/67), 90% (60/67) and 97% (65/67) and mean DBP readings for 73% (49/67), 94% (63/67) and 100% (67/67) were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg agreement across the two time regimens which achieved grade B and grade A validation, respectively. A BPP was costly and stressful for women and affected their ability to attend work and look after other children. CONCLUSIONS: A BPP performed over one hour compared to over three hours yields clinically equivalent results, yet has psychosocial and financial advantages.

Outpatient palliative care ­ a multiprofessional challenge. / Eine multiprofessionelle Herausforderung.

Life-threatening illness and the dying of a person presents a complex and particularly burdensome challenge for the person affected as well as for their relatives. This also applies to the professionals involved in caring and supporting the terminally ill patient. For this reason, palliative care has become a pioneer of a networked multi-professional and multi-perspective thinking and acting. In hardly any other medical field so many different professional groups and specialized disciplines work together in such an intensive manner. The rapid supply of drugs is an essential part of the specialized outpatient palliative care concept (SAPV). This cooperation is exemplified in this article.

An Examination of Eligibility Decisions in New York State's Assisted Outpatient Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) eligibility characteristics among participants receiving community treatment through AOT and non-AOT referrals. METHODS: A total of 131 AOT and non-AOT charts were reviewed from three sites within one treatment agency in New York City. Intake information was coded for AOT eligibility information, suicide history, and risk of future violence according to the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20, version 3 (HCR-20V3), instrument. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between groups for measurable AOT eligibility criteria. Compared with non-AOT participants, the participants referred through AOT scored significantly higher on HCR-20V3 for risk of future violence; however, most charts, including almost half of AOT participants, received low risk ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings raise questions about why some individuals, and not others, are referred to AOT in New York City.