Differences Among Older Adults in the Types of Dental Services Used in the United States.

The purpose of this article is to explore differences in the socioeconomic, demographic characteristics of older adults in the United States with respect to their use of different types of dental care services. The 2008 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) collected information about patterns of dental care use and oral health from individuals aged 55 years and older in the United States. We analyze these data and explore patterns of service use by key characteristics before modeling the relationship between service use type and those characteristics. The most commonly used service category was fillings, inlays, or bonding, reported by 43.6% of those with any utilization. Just over one third of those with any utilization reported a visit for a crown, implant, or prosthesis, and one quarter reported a gum treatment or tooth extraction. The strongest consistent predictors of use type are denture, dentate, and oral health status along with dental insurance coverage and wealth. Our results provide insights into the need for public policies to address inequalities in access to dental services among an older US population. Our findings show that lower income, less wealthy elderly with poor oral health are more likely to not use any dental services rather than using only preventive dental care, and that cost prevents most non-users who say they need dental care from going to the dentist. These results suggest a serious access problem and one that ultimately produces even worse oral health and expensive major procedures for this population in the future.

The potential oral health impact of cost barriers to dental care: findings from a Canadian population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Prior to the 2007/09 Canadian Health Measures Survey, there was no nationally representative clinical data on the oral health of Canadians experiencing cost barriers to dental care. The aim of this study was to determine the oral health status and dental treatment needs of Canadians reporting cost barriers to dental care. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of the 2007/09 Canadian Health Measures Survey was undertaken using a sample of 5,586 Canadians aged 6 to 79. Chi square tests were conducted to test the association between reporting cost barriers to care and oral health outcomes. Logistic regressions were conducted to identify predictors of reporting cost barriers. RESULTS: Individuals who reported cost barriers to dental care had poorer oral health and more treatment needs compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding dental care and/or foregoing recommended treatment because of cost may contribute to poor oral health. This study substantiates the potential likelihood of progressive dental problems caused by an inability to treat existing conditions due to financial barriers.

What matters to patients when their care is delegated to dental therapists?

AIM: To explore the experiences of adult patients and parents of child patients when their oral healthcare is delegated to dental therapists. METHOD: Narrative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews of a purposive sample of patients (n = 15) and parents of child patients (n = 3) who have been treated by therapists. RESULTS: Overall, participants reported positive experiences of treatment provided by therapists. Two main themes emerged from the data. The first; perceptions of the nature of dental services appeared related to the second; trust and familiarity in the dental team. Perceptions of the nature of dental services ranged from viewing dentistry as a public service to that of a private service, consistent with a more consumerist stance. Within this theme, three dimensions were identified: rationale for skill-mix; team hierarchy and importance of choice and cost. Consumerist perspectives saw cost reduction, rather than increasing access, as the rationale for skill-mix. Such perspectives tended to focus on hierarchy and a rights-based approach, envisaging dentists as the head of the team and emphasising their right to choose a clinician. Trust in and familiarity with the dental team appeared critical for therapists to be acceptable. Two dimensions were important in developing trust: affective behaviour and communication and continuity of care. Two further dimensions were identified in this theme: experience over qualification and awareness of therapists. Where trust and familiarity existed, participants emphasised the importance of their experiences of care over the qualifications of the providing clinician. Equally, trust in the dentist delegating care appeared to reassure participants, despite awareness of the role of therapists and their training being universally low. CONCLUSION: Regardless of perspective, views and experiences of treatment provided by therapists were positive. However, trust in and familiarity with the dental team appeared critical. Trust was apparently founded on dental teams' affective behaviour, communication skills and continuity of care. There are implications for skill-mix where staff turnover is high, as this is likely to compromise familiarity, continuity of care and ultimately trust.

Role of the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme in Enhanced Primary Care: allied health or allied outlier?

This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme (CDSS) and the Allied Health Profession (AHP) program as they related to the greater Enhanced Primary Care Scheme introduced by the Australian Government to manage patients with chronic and complex diseases. A retrospective analysis of data pertaining to Medicare items related to dentistry and the allied health professions were extracted from the Medicare Benefits Schedule database online, and formed the basis of this study. The highest proportion of services was provided in the state of New South Wales. There appears to be synergy in the utilisation of services with jurisdictions either overutilising or underutilising services. Costs to the Enhanced Primary Care Scheme under the CDSS model (fee for service) were up to 40 times more expensive compared with the AHP model (fee per visit). Costs and treatment associated with the CDSS experienced an increase of 13350% during the period 2007-08, coincident with an increase in subsidization. Reconstructive dentistry accounted for the majority of the increase. Gender disparities in dentistry were less distinct when compared with AHPs and were postulated to be due to males presenting with conditions that were more progressive requiring more invasive treatment. A comparative analysis indicates significant differences in costs, nature of treatment and the manner of remuneration between dentistry and the AHPs. A fee for service schedule as evidenced by the CDSS is dependent on the degree of financial incentive as indicated by patterns in utilisation over time. The amount of treatment considered necessary may be influenced by the level of subsidy with treatment that may not reflect disease management. The AHP model, which is based around a fee for visit schedule, is not without its deficiencies but has not experienced significant rises in cost compared with the CDSS.

Experience of socioeconomic-related inequality in dental care utilization among Thai elderly under universal coverage.

AIM: To assess the socioeconomic-related inequality in dental care utilization among Thai elderly and to determine factors associated with the observed inequality after the country achieved universal coverage. METHODS: The data were taken from the nationally representative Thailand Health & Welfare Survey 2007. Data of 10,096 Thai elderly (aged over 60 years) were selected. Descriptive analyses of the features of dental care utilization among Thai elderly were carried out, in addition to the concentration index (Cindex ) being used to quantify the extent of socioeconomic-related inequality in dental care utilization. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with inequality in dental care. RESULTS: Socioeconomic-related inequality in dental care utilization among Thai elderly was shown. Also, utilization was more concentrated among wealthier older adults, as shown by the positive value of Cindex (equals 0.244). The poor elderly, however, were more likely to utilize dental care at public facilities, particularly primary care facilities. Multivariate analysis showed that certain demographic, socioeconomic and geographic characteristics were particularly associated with poor-rich differences in dental care utilization among Thai elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Although socioeconomic-related inequality in dental care utilization among Thai elderly exists, the pro-poor utilization at public facilities, particularly primary care facilities, substantiates the concerted effort to reducing inequality in dental care utilization for Thai elderly.

Initial University of Otago oral health graduates' employment pathways and preparedness for work.

OBJECTIVES: To examine University of Otago BOH graduates' post-graduation pathways and employment experiences; and graduate, employer and host therapist perspectives of the new BOH programme and student/ graduate preparedness for work. DESIGN: A survey-based qualitative research project. SETTING: Private and public oral healthcare settings. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Open-ended questionnaires were used to conduct a 2010 survey of 2009 BOH graduates and consenting graduates' employers, and a 2011 survey of dental therapists who had hosted BOH students on clinical placement since 2009. Data were analysed inductively using a thematic content and analysis approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 18 (60%) of the 30,2009 BOH graduates completed the online graduate questionnaire with 10 providing employer information. Six employers completed the 'graduate attribute' questionnaire, and 30 (45%) of the 66 eligible host therapists, the 'student attribute' questionnaire. Clear themes emerged from the three participant groups. RESULTS: Of the 18 graduate participants, 10 were working in dental therapy and dental hygiene, with the remaining eight working in only one area. Graduates' primary concern was with maintaining both scopes of practice. Graduates and host therapists stressed a need for students' exposure to complex cases, while employers indicated that graduates' clinical confidence had developed over time. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for improving BOH graduates' transition outcomes included (1) increasing students' exposure to complex clinical and placement experience; (2) improving continuing education opportunities for new graduates; and (3) promoting interaction between BOH and dental students with a view to improving (future) dentists' knowledge of BOH graduate skills and attributes.

The relationship between body system-based chronic conditions and dental utilization for Medicaid-enrolled children: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Dental care is the most common unmet health care need for children with chronic conditions. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that not all children with chronic conditions encounter difficulties accessing dental care. The goals of this study are to evaluate dental care use for Medicaid-enrolled children with chronic conditions and to identify the subgroups of children with chronic conditions that are the least likely to use dental care services. METHODS: This study focused on children with chronic conditions ages 3-14 enrolled in the Iowa Medicaid Program in 2005 and 2006. The independent variables were whether a child had each of the following 10 body system-based chronic conditions (no/yes): hematologic; cardiovascular; craniofacial; diabetes; endocrine; digestive; ear/nose/throat; respiratory; catastrophic neurological; or musculoskeletal. The primary outcome measure was use of any dental care in 2006. Secondary outcomes, also measured in 2006, were use of diagnostic dental care, preventive dental care, routine restorative dental care, and complex restorative dental care. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the relative risk (RR) associated with each of the five outcome measures across the 10 chronic conditions. RESULTS: Across the 10 chronic condition subgroups, unadjusted dental utilization rates ranged from 44.3% (children with catastrophic neurological conditions) to 60.2% (children with musculoskeletal conditions). After adjusting for model covariates, children with catastrophic neurological conditions were significantly less likely to use most types of dental care (RR: 0.48 to 0.73). When there were differences, children with endocrine or craniofacial conditions were less likely to use dental care whereas children with hematologic or digestive conditions were more likely to use dental care. Children with respiratory, musculoskeletal, or ear/nose/throat conditions were more likely to use most types of dental care compared to other children with chronic conditions but without these specific conditions (RR: 1.03 to 1.13; 1.0 to 1.08; 1.02 to 1.12; respectively). There was no difference in use across all types of dental care for children with diabetes or cardiovascular conditions compared to other children with chronic conditions who did not have these particular conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Dental utilization is not homogeneous across chronic condition subgroups. Nearly 42% of children in our study did not use any dental care in 2006. These findings support the development of multilevel clinical interventions that target subgroups of Medicaid-enrolled children with chronic conditions that are most likely to have problems accessing dental care.

Implementation of an international short-term dental mission.

Dental professionals serve across the globe, working to alleviate the pain and suffering caused by dental disease. Many dental professionals serve on international mission trips, yet little has been published in the professional literature to guide dentists in establishing and operating a volunteer dental clinic in an international mission setting on a short-term basis. This article reports on multiple aspects of planning a short-term dental mission trip, including considerations in the selection of an indigenous national partner, concerns regarding the safety of patients and participants, scope of care decision-making, and the requisite equipment and supplies.

Dentists demonstrating professionalism: Dentists in private practice settings provide free or reduced-fee care.

Access to oral health care is an issue that has received attention at the local, state, regional, and national levels. This study focuses on how dentists in private practice settings attempt to address problems regarding access to care through personal initiatives. These dentists donate or discount services in their own offices to individuals who face access barriers. These donated or discounted services may go unreported and unnoticed. The research question addressed in this study is: What was the amount and type of free and reduced-fee care that dentists in the community of Brookline, Massachusetts, provided during the 2008 calendar year.

Community-based dental education at the Ohio State University: the OHIO Project.

In the late 1990s, Ohio's citizens expressed to the state leadership that access to dental care was their greatest unmet health need. State-sponsored surveys continued to report that certain populations-the poor, disabled, and minorities-experience higher-than-average rates of dental disease and cannot access care. The Ohio State University College of Dentistry sought to respond to this need by securing a $1.5 million grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in 2002 and began an experiment in engagement with community partners unprecedented in its history. As the state's flagship dental institution, the college committed to a fundamental change in its clinical education of students and began a process of making dental education relevant to our citizens, exposing students to populations they were being trained to help, and bolstering the fragile statewide network of safety-net clinics with providers. This case history offers an operational overview, including some challenges and successes, of one school's journey in community-based dental education.

Estimating the need for dental sedation. 1. The Indicator of Sedation Need (IOSN) - a novel assessment tool.

While the control of pain and anxiety is fundamental to the practice of dentistry, the use of conscious sedation in dentistry is very variable among dentists. The need for conscious sedation could be considered by assessing and ranking a combination of information on patient anxiety, medical history and the complexity of the anticipated clinical treatment. By undertaking this systemtic assessment an indication of sedation need may be developed which would act as an aide to decision making and, potentially, referral management. Such a tool could also be used by commissioners who need to identify patients who need conscious sedation for dental treatment in order to plan, commission and deliver appropriate sedation services.

Estimating the need for dental sedation. 2. Using IOSN as a health needs assessment tool.

AIM: This service evaluation assessed the need for sedation in a population of dental attenders (n = 607) in the North West of England. METHODS: Using the novel IOSN tool, three clinical domains of sedation need were assessed: treatment complexity, medical and behavioural indicators and patient reported anxiety using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale. RESULTS: The findings suggest that 5% of the population are likely to require a course of treatment under sedation at some time. All three clinical domains contributed to the IOSN score and indication of treatment need. Females were 3.8 times more likely than males to be placed within the high need for sedation group. Factors such as age, deprivation and practice location were not associated with the need for sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care trusts (PCTs) need health needs assessment data in order to commission effectively and in line with World Class Commissioning guidelines. This study provides both an indicative figure of need as well as a tool by which individual PCTs can undertake local health needs assessment work. Caution should be taken with the figure as a total need within a population as the study has only included those patients that attended dental practices.

Correlates of dental visits among community-residing Latino elders: a public health alert.

OBJECTIVES: To examine oral service utilisation in a probability sample of community-residing Latino elders. BACKGROUND: Older Latinos are at a potential increased risk of oral diseases, given their higher prevalence of co-morbidities and lower rate of dental service utilisation. METHODS: A prevalence survey was conducted among a random sample of Latino (largely Puerto Rican) elders (n = 205; mean age = 75.8; SD ± 5.3) in New York City during 2001-2002. A systematic random sample was drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Beneficiary tape files. Current use of oral health services and self-reported health conditions was obtained. Functional and cognitive impairment were assessed. RESULTS: Less than half of the sample reported a dental visit in the previous year. The average time since the last dental visit was 54 months (SD ± 84.5). Last year dental visit compliers were more likely to be unmarried, living alone, with higher levels of education, fewer health conditions and less impairment with activities of daily living. In multivariate analyses, problem-oriented behaviour, Medicaid beneficiary, education, living alone, chronic health conditions and mobility impairment explained 14% of the 'time since last dental visit' variance. CONCLUSIONS: Given that socio-demographic and level of functioning determinants appear to influence the frequency of dental visits, a multilevel approach to oral health promotion is imperative.

Clinical decision making by dentists working in the NHS General Dental Services since April 2006.

In April 2006 a new contract was introduced that governed how NHS General Dental Practitioners would be funded for the services they provide. This study looks at the impact that the contract has had in the three years since its introduction, evaluating its influence on the clinical care that patients receive and the clinical decisions that dentists are making. This qualitative service evaluation involved interviewing 12 dentists representative of a range of NHS dentists involved with the new NHS dental contract using a semi-structured approach. We found evidence that the new contract has led to dentists making different decisions in their daily practice and sometimes altering their treatment plans and referral patterns to ensure that their business is not disadvantaged. Access to care for some patients without a regular dentist can be compromised by the new contract as it can be financially challenging for a dentist to accept to care for a new patient who has an unknown and potentially large need for treatment. Cherry-picking of potentially more profitable patients may be common. The incentive is to watch borderline problems rather than to treat if a treatment band threshold has already been crossed and treatment may be delayed until a later course of treatment for the same reason. Dentists often feel that complex treatments (for example, endodontic treatments) are financially unviable. Some dentists are referring difficult cases that might previously have been treated 'in house', such as extractions, to another provider, as this enables offloading of costs while potentially retaining full fees. Younger and less experienced dentists may be further pressured.

Insurance billing and coding.

The purpose of this article is to highlight the importance of understanding various numeric and alpha-numeric codes for accurately billing dental and medically related services to private pay or third-party insurance carriers. In the United States, common dental terminology (CDT) codes are most commonly used by dentists to submit claims, whereas current procedural terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD.9.CM) codes are more commonly used by physicians to bill for their services. The CPT and ICD.9.CM coding systems complement each other in that CPT codes provide the procedure and service information and ICD.9.CM codes provide the reason or rationale for a particular procedure or service. These codes are more commonly used for "medical necessity" determinations, and general dentists and specialists who routinely perform care, including trauma-related care, biopsies, and dental treatment as a result of or in anticipation of a cancer-related treatment, are likely to use these codes. Claim submissions for care provided can be completed electronically or by means of paper forms.

Clinical use of dental classification.

The Dental Classification system used by the uniformed services is supposed to predict the incidence of dental emergencies in the operational setting, at least on the unit level. Since most Sailors and Marines are deployed without close dental support, the sea services have adopted a policy of early treatment of class 3 dental conditions during recruit training. The other services are beginning to do the same. Recently, two factors have emerged that are affecting this early dental class 3 treatment. These factors must be considered when planning to provide early dental treatment. First, changing population and dentist provider demographics in the civilian sector are beginning to affect the class 3 treatment needs of incoming military recruits. Second, attrition from recruit training results in treatment provided to recruits who leave military service before finishing their training. Some view this as a waste of resources, others as a cost of doing business. As operational jointness increases, the three services must develop and use a single dental classification terminology, as well as unified standards and guidelines, both for better research in this area and for the readiness and well-being of our patients.

Dental service patterns among private and public adult patients in Australia.

BACKGROUND: While the majority of dental care in Australia is provided in the private sector those patients who attend for public care remain a public health focus due to their socioeconomic disadvantage. The aims of this study were to compare dental service profiles provided to patients at private and public clinics, controlling for age, sex, reason for visit and income. METHODS: Data were collected in 2004-06, using a three-stage, stratified clustered sample of Australians aged 15+ years, involving a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI), oral examination and mailed questionnaire. Analysis was restricted to those who responded to the CATI. RESULTS: A total of 14,123 adults responded to the CATI (49% response) of whom 5,505 (44% of those interviewed) agreed to undergo an oral epidemiological examination. Multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, reason for visit and income showed that persons attending public clinics had higher odds [Odds ratio, 95%CI] of extraction (1.69, 1.26-2.28), but lower odds of receiving oral prophylaxis (0.50, 0.38-0.66) and crown/bridge services (0.34, 0.13-0.91) compared to the reference category of private clinics. CONCLUSION: Socio-economically disadvantaged persons who face barriers to accessing dental care in the private sector suffer further oral health disadvantage from a pattern of services received at public clinics that has more emphasis on extraction of teeth and less emphasis on preventive and maintenance care.