Long-term outcomes of peripheral atherectomy for femoropopliteal endovascular interventions.

BACKGROUND: The use of atherectomy during peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI) has increased dramatically, but data regarding its safety and effectiveness are lacking.  Aims: This study sought to determine the long-term safety of atherectomy in contemporary practice.  Methods: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who underwent femoropopliteal artery PVI from 2015-2018 were identified in a 100% sample of inpatient, outpatient, and carrier file data using procedural claims codes. The primary exposure was the use of atherectomy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for measured differences in patient populations. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare outcomes.  Results: Among 168,553 patients who underwent PVI, 59,142 (35.1%) underwent atherectomy. The mean patient age was 77.0±7.6 years, 44.9% were female, 81.9% were white, and 46.7% had chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Over a median follow-up time of 993 days (interquartile range 319-1,377 days), atherectomy use was associated with no difference in the risk of either the composite endpoint of death and amputation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.01; p=0.19) or of major adverse limb events (aHR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05; p=0.26). Patients who underwent atherectomy had a modest reduction in the risk of subsequently undergoing amputation or surgical revascularisation (aHR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.94; p<0.01) but an increase in the risk of undergoing a subsequent PVI (aHR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.16-1.21; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of atherectomy during femoropopliteal artery PVI was not associated with an increase in the risk of long-term adverse safety outcomes among patients with peripheral artery disease.

Assessment of Feasibility and Patency of below the Knee Atherectomy Using the 1.5 mm Phoenix Catheter-A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) contains a significant proportion of patients whose main pathology is located in the infragenicular arteries. The treatment of these patients requires a deliberate consideration due to the threat of possible complications of an intervention. In this retrospective study, the feasibility of a below-the-knee atherectomy (BTKA) via a 1.5 mm Phoenix atherectomy catheter and the patient outcome over the course of 6 months are investigated. Materials and Methods: The data of patients suffering from PAD with an infragenicular pathology treated via 1.5 mm Phoenix™ atherectomy catheter between March 2021 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to the intervention, after 2 weeks and 6 months, the PAD stages were graded and ankle-brachial-indeces (ABI) were measured. Results: The study shows a significant improvement of ABI, both after 2 weeks and 6 months. Additionally, the number of PAD stage IV patients decreased by 15.2% over the course of 6 months, and 18.2% of the patients improved to PAD stage IIa. Only one bleeding complication on the puncture side occurred over the whole study, and no other complications were observed. Conclusions: Phoenix™ atherectomy usage in the BTKA area seems to be feasible and related to a favorable outcome in this retrospective study.&nbsp.

Changes in the National Endovascular Management of Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: An Analysis of the 2011-2019 Medicare Data.

PURPOSE: To describe national trends in the utilization of endovascular approaches (including balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, and stent placement) for the management of femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary dataset containing 100% of Part B claims was interrogated for years 2011-2019. The Current Procedural Terminology codes specific for femoropopliteal angioplasty, stent placement, and atherectomy were used to create summary statistics for utilization by year, place of service (hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, and office-based laboratory), and provider specialty (cardiology, radiology, and surgery). RESULTS: The use of atherectomy increased from 34,732 (33%) procedures in 2011 to 75,435 (53%) procedures in 2019, and atherectomy became the dominant treatment strategy for femoropopliteal PAD. The relative utilization of stent placement (36,793 [35%] to 28,899 [20%]) and angioplasty only (34,398 [32%] to 38,228 [27%]) decreased concomitantly from 2011 to 2019. By 2019, the use of atherectomy was twofold higher in office-based laboratories than in the outpatient hospital setting (44,767 and 20,901, respectively). Treatment strategy varied by provider specialty in 2011 when cardiologists used atherectomy most frequently (17,925 [43%]), whereas radiologists used angioplasty alone (5,928 [6%]) and surgeons stented (18,009 [37%]) most frequently. By 2019, all specialties utilized atherectomy most frequently (29,564 [59%] for cardiology, 10,912 [58%] radiology, and 33,649 [47%] surgery). CONCLUSIONS: The national approach to endovascular management of femoropopliteal PAD has changed since 2011 toward an implant-free strategy, including a multifold increase in the use of atherectomy. Discordant rates of atherectomy use between the ambulatory hospital and office-based settings highlight the need for comparative effectiveness studies to guide management.

Index atherectomy peripheral vascular interventions performed for claudication are associated with more reinterventions than nonatherectomy interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Despite limited evidence supporting atherectomy alone over stenting/angioplasty as the index peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), the use of atherectomy has rapidly increased in recent years. We previously identified a wide distribution of atherectomy practice patterns among US physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of index atherectomy with reintervention. METHODS: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify all beneficiaries who underwent elective first-time femoropopliteal PVI for claudication between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Subsequent PVI reinterventions were examined through June 30, 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare rates of PVI reinterventions for patients who received index atherectomy versus nonatherectomy procedures. Reintervention rates were also described for physicians by their overall atherectomy use (by quartile). A hierarchical Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate patient and physician-level characteristics associated with reinterventions. RESULTS: A total of 15,246 patients underwent an index PVI for claudication in 2019, of which 59.7% were atherectomy. After a median of 603 days (interquartile range, 77-784 days) of follow-up, 41.2% of patients underwent a PVI reintervention, including 48.9% of patients who underwent index atherectomy versus 29.8% of patients who underwent index nonatherectomy (P < .001). Patients treated by high physician users of atherectomy (quartile 4) received more reinterventions than patients treated by standard physician users (quartiles 1-3) (56.8% vs 39.6%; P < .001). After adjustment, patient factors association with PVI reintervention included receipt of index atherectomy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.46), Black race (vs White; aHR; 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34), diabetes (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21), and urban residence (aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22). Physician factors associated with reintervention included male sex (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.04), high-volume PVI practices (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37), and physicians with a high use of index atherectomy (aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.27-1.74). Vascular surgeons had a lower risk of PVI reintervention than cardiologists (vs vascular; aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38), radiologists (aHR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.31-1.83), and other specialties (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.11). The location of services delivered was not associated with reintervention (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of atherectomy as an index PVI for claudication is associated with higher PVI reintervention rates compared with nonatherectomy procedures. Similarly, high physician users of atherectomy perform more PVI reinterventions than their peers. The appropriateness of using atherectomy for initial treatment of claudication needs critical reevaluation.

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment and Correlation With Angiographic Findings of Arterial Dissections Following Auryon Laser Atherectomy and Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty: Results of the iDissection Auryon Laser Study.

BACKGROUND: Femoropopliteal arterial angiographic dissections with the use of the Auryon laser atherectomy system (previously the B-laser) have been infrequent and non-flow limiting. However, the pattern of these dissections (depth and arc) using intravascular ultrasound remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 29 patients in the iDissection Auryon study. The primary objective was to define the occurrence of new adventitial injury with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Secondary objectives included distal embolization and bailout stenting as judged by the operator because of 30% or more residual narrowing and/or NHLBI (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) angiographic dissection C and higher. Core laboratory analysis was carried on all cases except for 1 patient (that crossed over to Jetstream atherectomy). Dissections were classified according to the iDissection classification as involving the intima (A), media (B), and adventitia (C) and ≤ 180-° arc (1) or >180-° arc (2). Overall, 22 of 29 patients had an embolic filter (per protocol). RESULTS: Median lesion and treated lengths were 100.0 and 150.0 mm, respectively. Vessel diameter by IVUS was 6.5 ± 1.5 mm. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) was present in 24.1% of cases. The arc of calcium was: no calcium in 27.6%, <90° in 13.8%, 90° to 180° in 20.7%, and >180° in 34.4%. Lesion severity was reduced to a median of 14% post laser and adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) from a baseline of 76%. Bailout stenting occurred in 6 of 28 (21.4%) patients (3 for dissections, 2 for residual >30%, and 1 for both) and primary stenting in 1 of 28 (3.6%). By IVUS, there were 9 new dissections post laser (1 adventitial; 3≥180°) and 21 new dissections post laser and PTA (3 adventitial; 1≥180°). No distal embolization requiring treatment was seen and no macrodebris ≥2 mm was recovered in the filters. CONCLUSION: The Auryon laser atherectomy system had minimal rate of adventitial injury despite complex disease with relatively low bailout stent rate and no clinically significant macrodebris.

Use of Atherectomy During Index Peripheral Vascular Interventions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe physician practice patterns and examine physician-level factors associated with the use of atherectomy during index revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. BACKGROUND: There are minimal data to support the routine use of atherectomy over angioplasty and/or stenting for the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service claims (January 1 to December 31, 2019) were used to identify all beneficiaries undergoing elective first-time femoropopliteal peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate patient- and physician-level characteristics associated with atherectomy. RESULTS: A total of 58,552 patients underwent index femoropopliteal PVI by 1,627 physicians. There was a wide distribution of physician practice patterns in the use of atherectomy, ranging from 0% to 100% (median 55.1%). Independent characteristics associated with atherectomy included treatment for claudication (vs. chronic limb-threatening ischemia; odds ratio [OR]: 1.51), patient diabetes (OR: 1.09), physician male sex (OR: 2.08), less time in practice (OR: 1.41 to 2.72), nonvascular surgery specialties (OR: 2.78 to 5.71), physicians with high volumes of femoropopliteal PVI (OR: 1.67 to 3.51), and physicians working primarily at ambulatory surgery centers or office-based laboratories (OR: 2.19 to 7.97) (p ≤ 0.03 for all). Overall, $266.8 million was reimbursed by Medicare for index femoropopliteal PVI in 2019. Of this, $240.6 million (90.2%) was reimbursed for atherectomy, which constituted 53.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide distribution of physician practice patterns for the use of atherectomy during index PVI. There is a critical need for professional guidelines outlining the appropriate use of atherectomy in order to prevent overutilization of this technology, particularly in high-reimbursement settings.

Propensity Score-Adjusted Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Among Revascularization Strategies for Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared long-term outcomes among specific treatment modalities for critical limb ischemia. The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), stent placement, atherectomy, or surgical bypass in patients diagnosed with critical limb ischemia. METHODS: In this observational study using Medicare claims data, we identified incident cases with a primary critical limb ischemia diagnosis who received PTA, stent placement, atherectomy, or surgical bypass. We used propensity score weighting to determine the association of treatment type with all-cause mortality and major (above ankle) amputation over 4 years follow-up. RESULTS: Among 36 860 patients (10 904 PTA; 11 295 stent placement; 4422 atherectomy; 10 239 surgical bypass), all-cause mortality over 4 years was 49.3% with atherectomy, 51.4% with surgical bypass, 53.7% with stent placement, and 54.7% with PTA (P<0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). Major amputation rates over 4 years were 6.8% with atherectomy, 7.8% with stent placement, 8.1% with PTA, and 10.8% with surgical bypass (P<0.05 for all pairwise comparison except PTA versus stent). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries who received PTA, stent placement, atherectomy, or surgical bypass for critical limb ischemia, high mortality and major amputation rates were observed with minor differences among treatment groups. Statistically significant group differences of uncertain clinical importance were observed for several comparisons. Results from observational research may be susceptible to bias because of unmeasured confounders and, therefore, these comparative results should be interpreted with caution.

Guidewire fracture during orbital atherectomy for peripheral artery disease: Insights from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Orbital atherectomy (OA) is routinely being used for plaque modification to facilitate percutaneous revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and arterial calcification. Guidewire fracture (GWF) during OA, though anecdotally described, has not been studied in a systematic manner. We conducted a review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to study the reports of wire fracture and its management and consequences. METHODS: We queried the MAUDE database for all events involving the current generation of the OA device: "Diamondback 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System", and "Stealth 360° Orbital PAD System". RESULTS: We identified 62 reports of GWF during OA for PAD. The superficial femoral artery was the most commonly involved atherectomy site. The wire fractured at the soft tip in a majority of cases (68%). Embolized wire fragments were left in the patient in 36 cases (58%), retrieved percutaneously in 10 cases (16%), and trapped by a stent against the arterial wall in eight cases (13%). Lastly, eight patients (13%) underwent surgery for removal of the wire fragment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published report to study the complication of GWF during peripheral OA. GWF is an uncommon but has significant procedural and clinical consequences. It results in a high rate of ancillary rescue procedures (including surgery) and is associated with a higher risk of arterial thrombosis and complications from wire retrieval attempts. The risk of wire fracture may be avoided with carefully adherence to the IFU.

Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of percutaneous peripheral atherectomy - An observational analysis from National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Although the published literature has reported an inverse association between hospital volume and outcomes of coronary interventions, sparse data are available for percutaneous peripheral atherectomy (PPA). The aim of our study was to examine the effect of hospital volume on outcomes of PPA. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database of the year 2012, PPA with ICD-9 code of 17.56 was identified. The primary outcomes were mortality and amputation rates; secondary outcomes were peri-procedural complications, cost, and length of hospitalization and discharge disposition of the patient. Multivariate models were generated for predictors of the outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 21,015 patients with mean age of 69.53 years, with 56% males. Higher hospital volume centers were associated with a significantly lower mortality (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.57, p < 0.0001), amputation rates (5.34% vs. 9.32%, p < 0.0001), combined endpoint of mortality and complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58, p < 0.0001), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (4.86 vs. 6.79 days, p < 0.0001) and lower hospitalization cost ($23,062 vs. $30,794, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for acute and chronic limb ischemia showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Hospital procedure volume is an independent predictor of mortality, amputation rates, complications, LOS, and costs in patients undergoing PPA with an inverse relationship.

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment and Correlation With Angiographic Findings Demonstrating Femoropopliteal Arterial Dissections Post Atherectomy: Results From the iDissection Study.

BACKGROUND: Dissections occur post atherectomy of the infrainguinal arteries. We hypothesized that angiography under-estimates their presence significantly. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, a total of 15 patients were evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following treatment of femoropopliteal de novo or non-stent restenosis using atherectomy. Eagle Eye Platinum ST IVUS catheters (Philips) were used in this study. Thirteen Jetstream XC atherectomy devices (Boston Scientific) and 2 investigational B-laser atherectomy devices (Eximo Medical) were used. Cine and IVUS images were obtained at baseline, after atherectomy, and after adjunctive balloon angioplasty. Angiographic and IVUS core labs analyzed the images. RESULTS: Mean age was 70.6 ± 8.0 years. Diabetes and claudication were present in 60% and 73%, respectively. Mean baseline, post-atherectomy, and post-adjunctive angioplasty stenosis severity was 71.4%, 38.1%, and 19.7%, respectively (P<.001 for both baseline vs post atherectomy and post atherectomy vs adjunctive angioplasty). Lesion length was 108.5 ± 43.1 mm. Forty-six dissections were identified on IVUS post atherectomy vs 8 dissections on angiogram (P<.01) (ratio, 5.75 to 1). Post adjunctive angioplasty, there were 39 dissections on IVUS vs 11 on angiogram (P<.01) (ratio, 3.55 to 1). Of these dissections, 13% and 30.8% were ≥180° in circumference post atherectomy and adjunctive balloon angioplasty, respectively (P=.047). Also, 39.1% and 33.3% involved the media and/or adventitia as seen on IVUS post atherectomy and adjunctive balloon angioplasty, respectively (P=.58). Longer lesions correlated with more dissections post atherectomy on IVUS (P=.03), but not on angiogram (P=.28). CONCLUSION: Dissections post atherectomy are grossly under-appreciated on angiogram when compared to IVUS. A multicenter registry correlating these findings with clinical outcomes is needed.

High Reintervention and Amputation Rates After Outpatient Atherectomy for Claudication.

Outpatient use of atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease has grown rapidly and outcomes are poorly understood. We analyzed outcomes of atherectomy done for claudication, comparing office and hospital outpatient settings. Analysis of Medicare Part B claims data was performed for incident femoral-popliteal or tibial-peroneal atherectomy from 2012 to 2014. Longitudinal analysis assessed services 18 months before, during, and up to 18 months after the incident peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). Differences between office-based and hospital outpatient-based settings were assessed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Comparing procedure settings, significant differences in race (femoral-popliteal: P = .04, tibial-peroneal: P = .001), chronic renal failure (femoral-popliteal: P = .002), and hypertension (femoral-popliteal: P = .01, tibial-peroneal: P = .006) were found. Nine hundred twenty-four patients undergoing femoral-popliteal atherectomy were analyzed (262 office based, 662 hospital outpatient based); 42.7% of office-based and 36.9% of hospital outpatient-based femoral-popliteal atherectomy patients had repeat PVI within 18 months ( P = .10). Major amputation was performed in 2.3% and 3.2% of patients in office and hospital outpatient settings, respectively ( P = .47). Four hundred twenty-three patients undergoing tibial-peroneal atherectomy were analyzed (202 office based, 221 hospital outpatient based); 46.5% of office-based and 38.9% of hospital outpatient-based tibial-peroneal atherectomy patients had repeat PVI within 1 year ( P = .11). Major amputation was performed in 5.0% and 8.1% of patients in office and hospital outpatient settings, respectively ( P = .19). Our study demonstrates higher than expected rates of major amputation for patients undergoing peripheral arterial atherectomy with regard to previously reported rates. Further studies may be required to prove the efficacy and safety of atherectomy for occlusive disease in the femoral-popliteal and tibial-peroneal segments to ensure outcomes are not worse than the natural history of medically managed claudicants.

Directional Atherectomy Is Associated with Better Long-Term Efficiency Compared with Angioplasty for Common Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease in Rutherford 2-4 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased interest in treating common femoral artery (CFA) with endovascular technology, there are little data regarding the long-term outcomes of different endovascular treatment modalities. We report the results after endovascular therapy of symptomatic obstructions of the CFA in a single center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients with eligible CFA lesions who were treated with endovascular methods between 2011 and 2013. The preoperative demographic operative details and postoperative outcomes were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety patients with CFA lesions were treated, and 76 (84.4%) completed a follow-up. Claudication was present in 62 of 76 (81.6%) patients, and stenosis was present in 60 of 76 (78.9%) patients. Angioplasty was performed in 45 patients, and atherectomy was performed in 31 patients. There was no significant difference in the preoperative demographic data, procedure time, contrast administration, or length of hospital stay between the 2 groups. In-hospital treatment costs were significantly higher in the atherectomy group (69,822 RenMinBi Yuan vs. 49,078 RenMinBi Yuan; P = 0.043). During the 4-year primary patency, for whole group or bifurcated/claudicant subgroup, all patients within the atherectomy group were significantly better than those in the angioplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: Atherectomy may be a better alternative to angioplasty for CFA atherosclerotic obstructions lesions. Compared with angioplasty, atherectomy seems to have better results in bifurcated lesions or claudicant patients. In diabetic patients, no superiority was found on either patency or improvement in walking distance.

Utilization and in-hospital outcomes associated with atherectomy in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease: An observational analysis from the National Inpatient Sample.

Objective Percutaneous revascularization for patients with peripheral arterial disease has become a treatment of choice for many symptomatic patients. The presence of severe arterial calcification presents many challenges for successful revascularization. Atherectomy is an adjunctive treatment option for patients with severe calcification undergoing percutaneous intervention. We sought to analyze the impact of atherectomy on in-hospital outcomes, length of stay, and cost in the percutaneous treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Methods Patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease undergoing percutaneous revascularization were assessed, utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (2012-2014) and appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic and procedural codes. Patients who were not treated with atherectomy ( n = 51,037) were compared to those treated with atherectomy ( n = 11,408). Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to address baseline differences. Results After performing propensity score-matched analysis, 11,037 patients were included in each group. Utilization of atherectomy was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (2% vs. 1.4% p = 0.0006). All secondary outcomes were lower when using atherectomy except acute renal failure. Length of stay was slightly lower when using atherectomy (7.2 vs. 7.0 days, p = 0.0494). However, median cost was higher in patients treated with atherectomy ($21,589 vs. $24,060, p = <0.0001). Conclusion The use of atherectomy was associated with significantly decreased in-hospital mortality, adverse events, and length of stay. Though, cost associated with atherectomy use is increased, this is offset by decreased in-hospital adverse outcomes. Appropriate use of atherectomy devices is an important tool in revascularization of peripheral arterial disease in select patients.

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the effect of laser energy on the arterial wall during the treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions: a CliRpath excimer laser system to enlarge lumen openings (CELLO) registry study.

The CliRpath Excimer Laser System to Enlarge Lumen Openings (CELLO) registry included patients treated with modified excimer laser catheters for the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease affecting the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and proximal popliteal artery. The aim of this study was to assess, via intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) the dissections in the vessel wall following treatment with the laser catheters. IVUS grayscale images from the CELLO registry were systematically reviewed for dissections in the treated vessel segments by two investigators. Images from 33 patients; 66 pullbacks (1867 IVUS frames in 2 phases), were successfully matched frame-to-frame to evaluate identical segments of the treated vessels in the two phases; post-2 mm Turbo-Elite laser pilot channel creation and post Turbo-Booster laser atherectomy. Dissections were categorized as; (1) intimal, (2) medial, (3) intramural hematoma, and (4) adventitial according to the ACC Clinical Expert Consensus Document classification of dissections. An average of 57 frames was evaluated per pullback, giving a total of 3734 frames (1867 matched for pre-ablation (post channel creation) and post-ablation phases). Treatments with the modified Excimer laser catheters resulted in a significant increase in lumen area of 5.5 ± 3.2-mm2 (95% CI 4.3-6.8, p < 0.0001) and reduction in plaque plus media volume of -10.6 ± 36.0 mm3 (95% CI -25.8 to 4.6, p = 0.1619) whilst giving rise to mainly intramural hematoma formations post Turbo-Booster laser treatment in 55% of frames assessed and 24% medial dissections with less than 1% adventitial disruption. The Excimer laser based Turbo-Booster treatment of peripheral artery lesions resulted in significant plaque debulking and increased lumen diameter with negligible degree of adventitial layer injury.

In-hospital outcomes and cost comparison of femoropopliteal reopening strategies.

PURPOSE: Atherectomy has emerged as an alternative to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for endovascular reopening. Despite increasing use of atherectomy (and higher cost of atherectomy catheters compared with balloon catheters), few studies have compared outcomes and costs with other reopening strategies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving all patients undergoing isolated femoropopliteal PTA (n=69) or atherectomy (n=92) at our institution from 1/2005 to 4/2006. The choice of reopening strategy was left to the treating physician, and no patients with relative contraindications to stent placement (specifically common femoral artery lesions) were included. Device and supply costs were calculated using the hospital resource-based accounting system, and other costs were calculated using the hospital micro-cost accounting system. Professional fees were calculated from the Medicare Fee Schedule. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally well matched. There were no significant differences in complications (vascular complications, urgent repeat reopening, death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) between groups (PTA 8.7% vs. atherectomy 5.4%, P=.53). PTA required more balloons (2.0±0.8 vs. 0.7±1.0, P<.001) and stents (1.5±0.8 vs. 0.2±0.5, P<.001), but fewer atherectomy catheters (0.0±0.0 vs. 1.2±0.4, P<.001). Neither procedural supply costs (PTA $3137±1459 vs. atherectomy $3338±1505, P=.20) nor total costs differed between PTA and atherectomy patients ($10,945±4521 vs. $10,783±3857, P=.42). CONCLUSIONS: Initial outcomes and costs are comparable for femoropopliteal PTA and atherectomy. The choice of reopening strategy should therefore be based on operator experience and anatomic suitability. Further studies are required to determine whether there are differences in long-term outcomes or costs between these approaches.