High-fat diet induced alteration in lipid enzymes and inflammation in cardiac and brain tissues: Assessment of the effects of Atorvastatin-loaded nanoparticles.

Treatment with Lipitor is associated with several adverse impacts. Here we investigated the effects of low Lipitor nanoparticles (atorvastatin calcium nanopartilcle [AC-NP]), with size less than 100 , on enzymes of lipid metabolism and inflammation in cardiac, hepatic, and brain tissues of hypercholestremic adult male rats. Adult male rats were divided into five experimental groups. In group 1, the intact control (normal pellet diet), animals were fed a normal control diet; the other four groups were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, groups from 2 to 5 were assigned as a positive control (HFD), HFD + Lipitor, HFD + AC-NP-R1, or HFD + AC-NP-R2. Different treatments were administrated orally for two regimen periods (R1 daily and R2 once every 3 days). The treatment was conducted for two consecutive weeks. The HFD group faced a significant elevation in 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA), associated with a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) along with cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase enzyme in hepatic tissues, compared with the control group. Also, the HFD group induced hepatic, cardiac, and brain inflammation, evidenced by increased hepatic oxidative stress markers and cardiac homocysteine, together with elevated proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and IL-6 levels in brain tissue, compared with the control group. Different AC-NP treatments significantly augmented both mRNA LDL-R and mRNA 7α-hydroxylase expression in hepatic tissues, associated with significant depletion in mRNA HMG-CoA expression, compared with HFD + Lipitor. The inflammation symptoms were ameliorated by the AC-NP treatments, compared to HFD + Lipitor. Lipitor encapsulation in NP formulation results in increased efficiency and reduced dose-related adverse effects known to be associated with the Lipitor chronic administration.

Generic atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in the South Korean market: time of introduction in relation to manufacturer characteristics.

Background: The competition for and market dynamics of generic medicines can be understood by analyzing manufacturers' behavior. In this study, we analyzed the various types of generic atorvastatin and rosuvastatin that were introduced onto the South Korean market from 2002 to 2018 and their corresponding manufacturers. Methods: Based on publicly available data, we selected drugs containing atorvastatin and rosuvastatin as active ingredients for the analysis. We calculated the time between the date of marketing approval for the first generic and that of the remaining generics. Then, we categorized manufacturers that marketed generics into first movers and latecomers. Results: We confirmed that many manufacturers have marketed generic drugs in South Korea and that manufacturers can be categorized as first movers and latecomers. Interestingly, latecomers account for a large portion of the manufacturers of generics, and they have entered the market steadily, even after the market matured with a number of manufacturers. Additionally, the characteristics of the manufacturers were closely related to manufacturers' behaviors in the market. Conclusions: The order-of-entry effect, which is commonly observed in other markets, is marginal in the South Korean market, and this phenomenon is mainly explained by the rare price competition among generic manufacturers.

Titration to High-Intensity Statin Therapy Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-intensity statins reduce CVD risk following AMI among patients with and without DM. METHODS: We determined the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries 66 to 75 years of age taking a low/moderate-intensity statin with (n = 6718) and without (n = 6414) DM who titrated to a high-intensity statin dosage (i.e., atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg, or rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg) following an AMI hospitalization in 2014-2015. All patients had a pharmacy claim for a statin fill within 365 days prior to, and within 30 days after their AMI hospitalization. We excluded beneficiaries without Medicare fee-for-service coverage including pharmacy benefits during the study period and those with a pharmacy claim for a high-intensity statin prior to their AMI. RESULTS: The first statin fill following hospital discharge was for a high-intensity dosage among 37.7% and 44.4% of patients with and without DM, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the risk ratio (RR) for titrating to a high-intensity statin comparing patients with versus without DM was 1.01 (95% CI 0.96, 1.06). Among patients whose first statin fill post-AMI was for a low/moderate-intensity dosage, 7.5% of those with DM titrated to a high-intensity statin within 182 days, compared with 9.2% of those without DM (multivariable-adjusted RR 0.90 [95% CI 0.75, 1.08]). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients taking a low/moderate-intensity statin were not titrated to a high-intensity dosage following AMI irrespective of their diabetes status, potentially leaving substantial residual risk for recurrent CVD events.

Experimentally designed lyophilized dry emulsion tablets for enhancing the antihyperlipidemic activity of atorvastatin calcium: Preparation, in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo assessment.

This article presents the development of lyophilized orally disintegrating tablets prepared with the dry emulsion technique to enhance the in-vitro dissolution and in-vivo performance of the poorly bioavailable drug atorvastatin calcium (ATV). Tablets were fabricated by freeze-drying o/w emulsions of ATV. The Emulsions were prepared using a matrix former solution (alginate or gelatin, 2 or 4%) containing a sugar alcohol (mannitol) and a collapse protectant (glycine) as the water phase and Labrafac® as the oil phase in the presence of surfactant (synperonic® PE/P 84 or synperonic® F108) under proper homogenization. The influence of formulation parameters on friability of the prepared tablets, disintegration time and in-vitro dissolution of the drug from these tablets were investigated. Results showed the significant influence of the matrix former and emulsifier type on the disintegration time. In-vitro dissolution study revealed the enhanced dissolution rate of ATV from the lyophilized dry emulsion tablets (LDET) compared to the plain drug. DSC and XRD studies of the optimized ATV-loaded LDET proved the presence of the drug in the amorphous form. SEM images showed the intact, porous and non-collapsible structure of the prepared LDET with complete loss of ATV crystallinity. Administration of ATV-loaded LDET to high fat diet-induced hyperlipidemic rats demonstrated a significant decrease (p<0.05) in the serum and tissue levels of the tested parameters compared to the market product used. The obtained results suggest a promising, easy-to-manufacture and effective dosage form for the treatment of hyperlipidemia.

Adherence to High-Intensity Statins Following a Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Importance: High-intensity statins are recommended following myocardial infarction. However, patients may not continue taking this medication with high adherence. Objective: To estimate the proportion of patients filling high-intensity statin prescriptions following myocardial infarction who continue taking this medication with high adherence and to analyze factors associated with continuing a high-intensity statin with high adherence after myocardial infarction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients following hospitalization for myocardial infarction. Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 75 years (n = 29 932) and older than 75 years (n = 27 956) hospitalized for myocardial infarction between 2007 and 2012 who filled a high-intensity statin prescription (atorvastatin, 40-80 mg, and rosuvastatin, 20-40 mg) within 30 days of discharge. Beneficiaries had Medicare fee-for-service coverage including pharmacy benefits. Exposures: Sociodemographic, dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage, comorbidities, not filling high-intensity statin prescriptions before their myocardial infarction (ie, new users), and cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient cardiologist visits after discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: High adherence to high-intensity statins at 6 months and 2 years after discharge was defined by a proportion of days covered of at least 80%, down-titration was defined by switching to a low/moderate-intensity statin with a proportion of days covered of at least 80%, and low adherence was defined by a proportion of days covered less than 80% for any statin intensity without discontinuation. Discontinuation was defined by not having a statin available to take in the last 60 days of each follow-up period. Results: Approximately half of the beneficiaries were women and fourth-fifths were white. At 6 months and 2 years after discharge among beneficiaries 66 to 75 years of age, 17 633 (58.9%) and 10 308 (41.6%) were taking high-intensity statins with high adherence, 2605 (8.7%) and 3315 (13.4%) down-titrated, 5182 (17.3%) and 4727 (19.1%) had low adherence, and 3705 (12.4%) and 4648 (18.8%) discontinued their statin, respectively. The proportion taking high-intensity statins with high adherence increased between 2007 and 2012. African American patients, Hispanic patients, and new high-intensity statin users were less likely to take high-intensity statins with high adherence, and those with dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage and more cardiologist visits after discharge and who participated in cardiac rehabilitation were more likely to take high-intensity statins with high adherence. Results were similar among beneficiaries older than 75 years of age. Conclusions and Relevance: Many patients filling high-intensity statins following a myocardial infarction do not continue taking this medication with high adherence for 2 years postdischarge. Interventions are needed to increase high-intensity statin use and adherence after myocardial infarction.

Assessment of Drug-Drug Interaction Potential Between Atorvastatin and LCZ696, A Novel Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan), a novel angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor has been recently approved for the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. As several HF patients are likely to use statins as co-medications, the potential for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between atorvastatin and LCZ696 was evaluated. METHODS: This was an open-label, three-period, single-sequence study in 28 healthy Chinese male subjects wherein LCZ696 200 mg was administered twice daily for 5 days in period 1. Following a washout period, atorvastatin 80 mg was administered once daily for 4 days (period 2) and subsequently co-administered with LCZ696 200 mg for 5 days (period 3). Serial plasma samples were collected to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of LCZ696 analytes (sacubitril, LBQ657, and valsartan) and atorvastatin and its metabolites. RESULTS: Atorvastatin co-administration had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of LBQ657, while the AUCτ,ss and C max,ss of sacubitril increased by 30 and 19 %, respectively, and the corresponding values for valsartan decreased by 19 and 9 %, respectively. Co-administration with LCZ696 increased C max,ss of atorvastatin, o-hydroxyatorvastatin, and p-hydroxyatorvastatin by 74, 68, and 108 %, respectively, and the AUCτ,ss of corresponding analytes increased by 34, 22, and 26 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While atorvastatin had no significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes upon co-administration, the C max of atorvastatin and its metabolites increased twofold, with a marginal increase in AUC (<1.3-fold). Multiple-dose administration of LCZ696 200 mg twice daily and atorvastatin 80 mg once daily either alone or in combination was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Safety of atorvastatin in Asian patients within clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Data on statin safety in Asian patients are limited compared with evidence from Western populations. AIM: This study assessed atorvastatin safety among Asian patients enrolled in 58 randomized clinical trials. METHODS: Data from 52 short-term trials (median exposure 4-72 weeks) and six long-term cardiovascular outcomes trials (median exposure 3.1-4.9 years) conducted across the atorvastatin 10-80-mg dose range were analyzed retrospectively to assess the incidence of safety endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 77 952 patients were identified (49 974 received atorvastatin), among whom 3191 were Asian (2519 received atorvastatin). In the short-term trials, the incidence of all-causality adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) in Asian patients treated with atorvastatin was similar to or lower than that observed with other statins or placebo, and discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs/SAEs were infrequent (2.0% across all doses). These observations were confirmed in the long-term trials. Treatment-related SAEs were rare (n = 4) among Asian patients receiving atorvastatin. No cases of rhabdomyolysis were observed in atorvastatin-treated Asian patients, and the incidence of myalgia was 1.8% in the short-term studies and 6.7% in the long-term trials. Elevations (>3× the upper limit of normal) in liver transaminases were observed in ~2% of Asian patients receiving atorvastatin; renal AEs occurred in <2%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of AEs/SAEs with atorvastatin 10-40-mg in patients of Asian origin was low and comparable to placebo. Further evaluation of atorvastatin 80-mg is required owing to the limited number of Asian patients (n = 281; 11.2%) who received this dose.

Cost-effectiveness of adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin vs switching to rosuvastatin therapy in Portugal.

BACKGROUND: Statin monotherapy is the mainstay of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management for high cardiovascular risk patients in Portugal; however, several therapeutic options are available and predicted to have different clinical and economic impacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding ezetimibe 10 mg (EZ10) to atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg (A10/20) vs switching to rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg (R10/20) in Portuguese patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and/or diabetes who are currently above the LDL-C goal. METHODS: A Markov model was used to describe CHD disease progression and the lifetime costs and utilities associated with each disease state were used to estimate the gains in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), of the two treatment regimens. Model inputs, such as age, gender, and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors of the dyslipidemic Portuguese patients were obtained from the Portuguese cohort of the Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS). The efficacy of each treatment regimen, the cost of drugs and of treating CHD events, and the utilities for each disease state were derived from published sources. RESULTS: The estimated lifetime discounted number of QALYs gained by patients treated with A10/20 was 8.70, while in those switching to R10/20 it was 8.81 and in those adding EZ10 it was 8.93. Discounted total health costs were estimated to be €11,131 for A10/20, but €14,511 and €16,571 for R10/20 and A10/20 + EZ10, respectively. The ICER of adding ezetimibe vs switching to rosuvastatin was €16,465/QALY. Based on the Portuguese cost-effectiveness willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY, adding ezetimibe vs switching to rosuvastatin would be a cost-effective use of resources in Portugal. Sensitivity analyses in patients with differing clinical histories (CHD or diabetes or both) yielded similar values, with no ICER over €30,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the National Health Service, prescribing ezetimibe to high cardiovascular risk patients being treated with atorvastatin vs switching them to rosuvastatin is projected to be a cost-effective use of resources in Portugal.

Quality and efficiency of statin prescribing across countries with a special focus on South Africa: findings and future implications.

INTRODUCTION: Statins are recommended first-line treatment for hyperlipidemia, with published studies suggesting limited differences between them. However, there are reports of under-dosing. South Africa has introduced measures to enhance generic utilization. Part one documents prescribed doses of statins in 2011. Part two determines the extent of generics versus originator and single-sourced statins in 2011 and their costs. RESULTS: Underdosing of simvastatin in 2011 with average prescribed dose of 23.7 mg; however, not for atorvastatin (20.91 mg) or rosuvastatin (15.02 mg). High utilization of generics versus originators at 93-99% for atorvastatin and simvastatin, with limited utilization of single-sourced statins (22% of total statins - defined daily dose basis), mirroring Netherlands, Sweden and UK. Generics priced 33-51% below originator prices. DISCUSSION: Opportunity to increase simvastatin dosing through education, prescribing targets and incentives. Opportunity to lower generic prices with generic simvastatin 96-98% below single-sourced prices in some European countries.

The Fuster-CNIC-Ferrer Cardiovascular Polypill: a polypill for secondary cardiovascular prevention.

During the last decade, there has been a tremendous effort to develop different cardiovascular polypills in response to the upsurge in global cardiovascular disease worldwide. The pharmacological development of such a strategy has proven to be extremely complex from a formulation standpoint. Not all drugs are suitable for use in a polypill because of potential drug incompatibilities between them. Candidate agents must be safe, well tolerated, effective, guideline recommended and physiochemically compatible with the other components of the pill. The Fuster-CNIC-Ferrer cardiovascular (CV) polypill has been found to be the first-in-class polypill to be approved and commercialized in Europe and Latinamerican Countries. In this article, we review the pharmacological properties of its three components, including the clinical evidence supporting their use in patients with established cardiovascular disease, their pharmacokinetic properties, adverse effects, drug interactions and contraindications.